XML 24 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the results of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated during consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its significant estimates including the valuation of accounts receivable, the lives of tangible and intangible assets, stock-based compensation, stock warrants, revenue recognition, the valuation of acquired intangible assets, and provisions for income taxes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other market-specific and relevant assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences could be material to the financial position and results of operations.

Segment Information

The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The CEO reviews the financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating the Company’s financial performance. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it operates in a single reporting segment; cloud platform.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency for the Company’s foreign operations is the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of operations for the period in other expense, net. All assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at the transaction spot rate. For the years ended January 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, foreign currency transaction gains and losses were comprised of a net loss of $638,000, $789,000 and $166,000, respectively.   

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company’s services are concentrated in an industry which is characterized by significant competition, rapid technological advances and changes in customer requirements and industry standards. The success of the Company depends on management’s ability to anticipate and respond quickly and adequately to technological developments in the industry and changes in customer requirements and industry standards. Any significant delays in the development or introduction of services could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and operating results. Furthermore, the effects of potential legal activity that could be brought against the Company, including costs incurred to defend legal cases, relationships with customers and market perception, and the financial impact of any judicial decisions, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and operating results.

The Company serves customers and users from data center facilities operated by a single third party, located in the U.S., Singapore, Ireland, Germany and Australia. The Company has internal procedures to restore services in the event of disasters at the current data center facilities. Even with these procedures for disaster recovery in place, cloud applications could be significantly interrupted during the procedures to restore services.

Concentration of Risk and Significant Customers

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Cash deposits may, at times, exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”). The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents to date.

No customer balance comprised 10% or more of total accounts receivable at January 31, 2017 or 2016.

During the years ended January 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, revenues by geographic area, based on billing addresses of the customers, was as follows:

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

 

 

January 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

United States

 

$

90,449

 

 

$

60,411

 

 

$

38,091

 

Foreign countries

 

 

43,326

 

 

 

23,267

 

 

 

12,754

 

Total revenues

 

$

133,775

 

 

$

83,678

 

 

$

50,845

 

 

No single foreign country represented more than 10% of the Company’s revenues in any period.

Additionally, no single customer represented more than 10% of the Company’s revenues in any period.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and money market funds, trade receivables, accounts payable and preferred stock warrants. Cash and cash equivalents and warrants are reported at fair value. The recorded carrying amount of trade receivables and accounts payable approximates their fair value due to their short-term nature.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of less than three months from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents consist of monies held in bank demand deposits and money market funds and are presented at fair market value based on quoted market prices.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company extends credit to its customers in the normal course of business, and does not require cash collateral or other security to support the collection of customer receivables. The Company estimates the amount of uncollectible accounts receivable at the end of each reporting period based on the aging of the receivable balance, historical experience, and communications with customers, and provides a reserve when needed. Accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $672,000 and $115,000 at January 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Deferred Commissions

The Company capitalizes commission costs that can be associated specifically with a non-cancelable subscription contract. Commissions are earned by sales personnel upon the execution of the sales contract by the customer, and commission payments are made shortly after they are earned. Deferred commissions are amortized over the term of the related non-cancelable customer contract. The Company capitalized commission costs of $4.5 million, $5.4 million and $3.2 million and amortized $4.0 million, $2.8 million and $1.4 million to sales and marketing expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations during the years ended January 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.     

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs consist primarily of compensation related costs incurred for the maintenance and bug fixing of the Company’s software platform, as well as planning, predevelopment and post implementation costs associated with the development of enhancements to the Company’s software platform.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in sales and marketing expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Advertising expense totaled $446,000, $1.7 million and $360,000 for the years ended January 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.   

Capitalized Software Development Costs

The Company capitalizes certain development costs incurred in connection with software development for its cloud-based platform. Costs incurred in the preliminary stages of development are expensed as incurred. Once the software has reached the development stage, internal and external costs, if direct and incurred for adding incremental functionality to our platform, are capitalized until the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalization ceases upon completion of all substantial testing. These software development costs are recorded as part of property and equipment.

Capitalized software development costs are amortized on a straight-line basis to cost of revenues—subscription services over the technology’s estimated useful life, which is two years. During the years ended January 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company capitalized $4.3 million, $3.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, in software development costs.   

Software development costs incurred in the maintenance and minor upgrade and enhancement of software without adding additional functionality are expensed as incurred.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Furniture and equipment is amortized over an estimated useful life of three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their useful life, estimated at five years, or the remaining term of the lease. Upon retirement or sale of assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the balance sheet and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in the statement of operations. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is the excess of costs over fair value of net assets of the business acquired. Goodwill and other intangible assets acquired that are determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized but are tested for impairment at least annually.

Other intangible assets, which consist of acquired developed technology and customer relationships, are recorded at fair value, net of accumulated amortization, and are amortized using the straight-line method. The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The Company has not recorded impairment charges on goodwill and other intangible assets for the periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives its revenues primarily from subscription services fees and professional services fees. The Company sells subscriptions to its cloud platform through contracts that are typically three years in length. The arrangements do not contain general rights of return. The subscription contracts do not provide customers with the right to take possession of the software supporting the applications and, as a result, are accounted for as service contracts.

The Company commences revenue recognition for its subscription services and professional services when all of the following criteria are met:

 

There is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;

 

The service has been or is being provided to the customer;

 

Collection of the fees is reasonably assured; and

 

The amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable.

Subscription Services Revenues

Subscription services revenues are recognized ratably over the contractual term of the arrangement beginning on the date that the service is made available to the customer, provided revenue recognized does not exceed amounts that are able to be invoiced, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Professional Services Revenues

Professional services are generally sold on a fixed-fee or time-and-materials basis. Revenue for time-and-material arrangements is recognized as the services are performed. For fixed‑fee and other types of arrangements entered into prior to the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending January 31, 2017, professional services revenue was generally deferred and recognized upon the completion of the project under the completed performance method of accounting. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending January 31, 2017, we developed the ability to accurately estimate professional services costs on a project basis. As such, revenue for fixed‑fee and other types of arrangements entered into after the third quarter of the fiscal year ending January 31, 2017 is recognized as services are performed under the proportional performance method of accounting.

Multiple Deliverable Arrangements

For arrangements with multiple deliverables, the Company evaluates whether the individual deliverables qualify as separate units of accounting. In order to treat deliverables in a multiple deliverable arrangement as separate units of accounting, the deliverables must have standalone value upon delivery. If the deliverables have standalone value upon delivery, the Company accounts for each deliverable separately, recognizing the respective revenue as the services are delivered.

The Company has determined that its subscription services have standalone value, as the Company sells its subscriptions separately. The professional services related to the Company’s subscription services also have standalone value as numerous partners are trained to perform these professional services and these partners have a history of contracting directly with customers and successfully completing deployments of the Company’s software platform.

When multiple deliverables included in an arrangement are separable into different units of accounting, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the identified units of accounting based on the relative selling price of each unit of accounting. Multiple deliverable arrangement accounting guidance provides a hierarchy when determining the relative selling price for each unit of accounting. Vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of selling price, based on the price at which the item is regularly sold by the vendor on a standalone basis, should be used if it exists. If VSOE of selling price is not available, third-party evidence (“TPE”) of selling price is used to establish the selling price if it exists. VSOE and TPE do not currently exist for any of the Company’s deliverables. Accordingly, for arrangements with multiple deliverables that can be separated into different units of accounting, the relative selling price of each unit of accounting is based on best estimate of selling price (“BESP”).

The Company determines the BESP for deliverables based on overall pricing objectives, which take into consideration market conditions and entity-specific factors. This includes a review of historical data related to the size of arrangements, the cloud applications being sold, customer demographics and the numbers and types of users within the arrangements.

Cost of Subscription Services Revenue

Cost of subscription services revenue consist primarily of expenses related to the hosting of the Company’s subscription service and supporting the Company’s customers. These expenses are comprised of third-party hosting expenses, amortization of intangible assets and personnel and related costs directly associated with the Company’s cloud infrastructure and cloud operations, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation and allocated overhead.

Overhead associated with facilities, information technology and depreciation, excluding depreciation related to the Company’s data center infrastructure, is allocated to the cost of revenue and operating expenses based on headcount by cost center.

Cost of Professional Services Revenue

Cost of professional services revenue consist primarily of personnel costs directly associated with deployment of the Company’s solution, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation, travel costs and allocated overhead, and costs of subcontractors.

Deferred Revenue

Deferred revenue consists of customer billings or payments received in advance of the recognition of revenue and is recognized as revenue as the revenue recognition criteria are met. The Company generally invoices its customers annually for the forthcoming year of service. Accordingly, the Company’s deferred revenue balance does not include revenue for future years of multiple year non-cancellable contracts that have not yet been billed.

 

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires that deferred income taxes be provided for temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. In addition, deferred tax assets are recorded for the future benefit from the utilization of net operating losses and research and development credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that they will be realized.

The Company’s policy for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of the preparation of tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. Since the date of adoption of accounting for uncertain tax positions, the Company has accrued immaterial interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits for all periods presented.

Preferred Stock Warrant Liability

The Company’s freestanding warrants to purchase the Company’s convertible preferred stock were classified as liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and recorded at fair value because these warrants may obligate the Company to transfer assets to the warrant holders at a future date under certain circumstances, such as a change in control, and because of a clause that modifies the number of shares of the warrants to compensate the holder in the event that the Company issues certain securities below the warrant exercise price per share. The warrants were subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date, and any change in fair value was recognized in the consolidated statements of operations as other expense, net. Preferred stock warrants were exercised during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2017 and 2016 and any related preferred stock warrant liability was remeasured to fair value through the exercise date, and the remaining liability was reclassified to stockholders’ equity.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures and recognizes stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based awards, including grants of stock, restricted stock units (“RSU”) and options to purchase stock, made to employees, outside directors and consultants based on estimated fair values.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value its options at the date of grant based on certain assumptions. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation for grants that vest based on only a service condition using the straight-line single-option approach. The Company recognizes stock-based expenses related to shares issued pursuant to its 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) on a straight-line basis over the offering period, which is 24 months.

For RSUs granted before the IPO, the Company began recording stock-based compensation expense upon its IPO using the graded-vesting method because these awards vested upon satisfaction of both a service and a performance condition. For RSUs granted following its IPO, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation using the straight-line method. The fair value of an RSU is measured using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense from market-based awards using the graded-vesting method. The fair value of such awards is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation approach.

The Company records stock-based compensation expense from stock-based awards granted to non-employees at the estimated fair value of the awards upon vesting. The Company values options granted to non-employees using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. These awards are remeasured over their term until vested, exercised, cancelled or expired.

Stock-based compensation expenses are recognized net of estimated forfeiture rate. The Company’s forfeiture rate is based on an analysis of its actual forfeitures. A higher (lower) revised forfeiture rate than previously estimated will result in an adjustment that will decrease (increase) the stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operations.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Company’s comprehensive loss is composed only of net loss.

Recent Accounting Guidance

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. The new guidance simplifies the accounting for measurement period adjustments in connection with business combinations by requiring that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  There was no material impact due to the adoption of this new standard.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement (“ASU 2015-05”). ASU 2015-05 provides guidance to clarify the customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. ASU 2015-05 was adopted by the Company in the first quarter of the year ending January 31, 2017. There was no material impact due to the adoption on a prospective basis of this new standard.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosures of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. This standard provides guidance on how and when reporting entities must disclose going-concern uncertainties in their financial statements. The guidance was adopted by the Company in the year ending January 31, 2017. There was no material impact due to the adoption of this new standard.

New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance for revenue recognition. This ASU affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of non-financial assets. This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. This ASU also supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 31, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for all public entities only as of annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The guidance allows for the amendment to be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company has not finalized a decision regarding the adoption method at this time. The Company is not planning to early adopt the new standard and is continuing to assess the impact of the adoption on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures and has not yet determined whether the effect will be material. The Company preliminarily believes that the new standard will impact revenue recognized due to the removal of the current limitation on contingent revenue. In addition commissions accounting under the new standard is expected to be significantly different than the Company’s current capitalization policy. The new standard will result in additional types of costs that will be capitalized and amounts will be amortized over a period longer that the Company’s current policy of amortizing the deferred amounts over the specific revenue contract-terms.  The new standard also requires incremental disclosures including information about the remaining transaction price and when the Company expects to recognize revenue. The Company continues to assess the new standard along with industry trends and additional interpretive guidance and may adjust its interpretation and implementation plan accordingly.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees with capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and classification in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and for all other entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt the standard as of February 1, 2017. Upon adoption, the main impact is expected to be recognizing all the previously unrecognized excess tax benefits through a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated deficit. The previously unrecognized excess tax effects will be recorded as a deferred tax asset, which the Company expects will be almost fully offset by a valuation allowance. In addition the Company expects to make an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur.

In November 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standard update on the presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The new guidance requires an entity to show the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows, and an entity will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this new accounting standard update on the financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued a new accounting standard update on narrowing the definition of a business. The new guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance also requires a business to include at least one substantive process and narrows the definition of outputs. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is still evaluating the possibility to early adopt the new guidance. Adoption is expected to have no impact on the Company’s historical financial statements.

In January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 also clarifies the requirements for excluding and allocating foreign currency translation adjustments to reporting units related to an entity’s testing of reporting units for goodwill impairment, and clarifies that an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2020 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of the adoption of ASC 2017-04 on its consolidated financial statements.