XML 26 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

 

3.

Fair Value Measurements

The accounting guidance defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the accounting guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

 

Level 1:

 

Includes financial instruments for which quoted market prices for identical instruments are available in active markets.

 

 

Level 2:

 

Includes financial instruments for which there are inputs other than quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transaction (less active markets) or model-driven valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

 

 

Level 3:

 

Includes financial instruments for which fair value is derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable, including management’s own assumptions.

 

Below is a summary of assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets

for Identical

Assets (Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

10,221,563

 

 

$

10,221,563

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

24,334,917

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,334,917

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

34,556,480

 

 

$

10,221,563

 

 

$

24,334,917

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

December 31,

2014

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets

for Identical

Assets (Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

6,998,111

 

 

$

6,998,111

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Municipal bonds

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

28,589,331

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,589,331

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

35,657,442

 

 

$

6,998,111

 

 

$

28,659,331

 

 

$

 

 

The Company’s marketable securities, consisting principally of debt securities, are classified as available-for-sale, are stated at fair value, and consist of Level 2 financial instruments in the fair value hierarchy. The Company determines the fair value of its debt security holdings based on pricing from a service provider. The service provider values the securities based on using market prices from a variety of industry-standard independent data providers. Such market prices may be quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 inputs) or pricing determined using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2 inputs), such as yield curve, volatility factors, credit spreads, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments or debt, broker and dealer quotes, as well as other relevant economic measures.

The fair value of the convertible preferred stock warrant liability was determined based on “Level 3” inputs and utilized the Black-Scholes model for the Series A convertible preferred stock warrants. The Series B convertible preferred stock warrants utilized a Monte Carlo model. The warrant liabilities were marked to market before converting to equity at the IPO. The following table presents activity for the convertible preferred stock warrant liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable Level 3 inputs during the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

 

 

Fair Value

Measurements at

Reporting Date

Using Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

160,345

 

Issuance of preferred stock warrants

 

 

625,679

 

Changes in fair value reflected as other financing expense

 

 

3,457,184

 

Conversion to equity at IPO

 

 

(4,243,208

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

 

 

The fair value of the convertible promissory notes was determined based on “Level 3” inputs and valued the notes utilizing an estimated cost of debt from publicly available information on issuances of high yield fixed income securities issued by comparable companies. The Company concluded that a 15% discount rate was appropriate, resulting in an initial fair value for the notes of $970,000. The discount was accreted to interest expense through the Company’s IPO and was accreted completely at the IPO as the notes plus accrued interest converted to common stock at the IPO. The following table presents activity for the convertible promissory notes measured at fair value using significant unobservable Level 3 inputs during the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

 

 

Fair Value

Measurements at

Reporting Date

Using Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

 

Issuance of convertible promissory notes

 

 

970,000

 

Accretion of debt discount to interest expense

 

 

31,439

 

Conversion to equity at IPO

 

 

(1,001,439

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$