XML 56 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Accounting guidance on fair value measurements for certain financial assets and liabilities requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1
Inputs that are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. Level 1 assets for the Company includes a money market deposit account (“MMDA account”).
Level 2
Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
In valuing assets and liabilities, the Company is required to maximize the use of quoted market prices and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company calculates the fair value of its Level 1 and Level 2 instruments based on the exchange traded price of similar or identical instruments where available or based on other observable instruments. These calculations take into consideration the credit risk of both the Company and its counterparties. The Company has not changed its valuation techniques in measuring the fair value of any financial assets and liabilities during the period.
In June 2013, the Company purchased certain available-for-sale securities in a non-public entity for which the lowest level of significant inputs was unobservable. On a recurring basis, the Company uses pricing models and similar techniques for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment by management. Accordingly, the Company classifies the available-for-sale securities as Level 3 in the table below.
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities at December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively, that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, segregated by level within the fair value hierarchy:
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
($ in millions)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds (1)
$
86.8

 
$

 
$

 
$
86.8

Other current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale equity securities
0.1

 

 

 
0.1

Other non-current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale equity securities
23.2

 

 
1.1

 
24.3

Total as of December 31, 2014
$
110.1

 
$

 
$
1.1

 
$
111.2


 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
($ in millions)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds (1)
$
138.9

 
$

 
$

 
$
138.9

Other current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale equity securities
0.1

 

 

 
0.1

Other non-current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale equity securities
19.8

 

 
1.1

 
20.9

Total as of June 30, 2014
$
158.8

 
$

 
$
1.1

 
$
159.9

_____________
(1)
Money market funds include MMDA account balances of $55.2 million and $71.6 million as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively.
The following table sets forth an analysis of changes during the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, in Level 3 financial assets of the Company:
 
December 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
($ in millions)
Beginning balance
$
1.1

 
$
1.1

Net realized/unrealized gains (losses)

 

Purchases

 

Transfers in (out) of Level 3

 

Ending balance
$
1.1

 
$
1.1


The Company did not incur any Level 3 fair value asset impairments during the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Changes in economic conditions or model based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments between levels. The Company’s policy is to record transfers between levels if any, as of the beginning of the fiscal year. For the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, there were no transfers between levels.