XML 30 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Research and Development Costs

All research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and consist principally of costs related to clinical trials, license fees and salaries and related benefits. Clinical trial costs are a significant component of research and development expenses. These costs are accrued based on estimates of work performed and require estimates of total costs incurred based on patients enrolled, progress of clinical studies and other events. Clinical trial costs are subject to revision as the trials progress and revisions are charged to expense in the period in which they become known.

Revenue Recognition

Collaborative agreement revenue

The Company identifies the deliverables included within the agreement and evaluates which deliverables represent separate units of accounting. Analyzing the arrangement to identify deliverables requires the use of judgment, and each deliverable may be an obligation to deliver services, a right or license to use an asset, or another performance obligation. A delivered item is considered a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has value to the partner on a standalone basis based on the consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances for each arrangement. Factors considered in this determination include the research capabilities of the partner and the availability of research expertise in this field in the general marketplace. Arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the agreement to all identified units of accounting based on their relative selling price. The relative selling price for each deliverable is determined using vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of selling price or third-party evidence of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor third-party evidence of selling price exists, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for the deliverable. The amount of allocable arrangement consideration is limited to amounts that are fixed or determinable. The consideration received is allocated among the separate units of accounting, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate units. Changes in the allocation of the sales price between delivered and undelivered elements can impact revenue recognition but do not change the total revenue recognized under any agreement. Upfront license fee payments are recognized upon delivery of the license if facts and circumstances dictate that the license has standalone value from the undelivered items, which generally include research and development services and the manufacture of drug products, the relative selling price allocation of the license is equal to or exceeds the upfront license fee, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the Company’s price to the partner is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Upfront license fee payments are deferred if facts and circumstances dictate that the license does not have standalone value. The determination of the length of the period over which to defer revenue is subject to judgment and estimation and can have a material impact on the amount of revenue recognized in a given period.

The Company accounts for milestone payments under its agreements using the milestone method of accounting. The Company recognizes consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is substantive in its entirety. A milestone is considered substantive when it meets all of the following three criteria: 1) the consideration is commensurate with either the entity’s performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the entity’s performance to achieve the milestone, 2) the consideration relates solely to past performance, and 3) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. A milestone is defined as an event (i) that can only be achieved based in whole or in part on either the entity’s performance or on the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from the entity’s performance, (ii) for which there is substantive uncertainty at the date the arrangement is entered into that the event will be achieved and (iii) that would result in additional payments being due to the Company. Any milestone payments that do not satisfy these revenue recognition criteria are recorded over the remaining life of the agreements with a cumulative catch up adjustment for the portion of the milestone earned from the inception of the agreement to the expected term of the agreement. The excess of the milestone paid and the amount recognized in the cumulative catch up adjustment is recorded as deferred revenue and recognized over the remaining expected term of the agreement.

Royalty revenue

Royalties to be received based on sales of the Company’s licensed products by partners are recognized as earned.

Product Sales, Net

The Company’s net product sales consist of U.S. sales of Contrave as well as product sales to its distributors in other countries. The Company recognizes product revenue when all four of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii) the selling price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Effective August 1, 2016, the Company reacquired the commercial rights for Contrave from Takeda and began selling Contrave in the U.S.  The Company commenced shipments of Contrave to its wholesalers in mid-August 2016. The Company has determined it does not currently have the necessary history of transactions to reasonably estimate certain sales allowances at the time title and risk of loss transfers to the wholesalers. Accordingly, the price is not considered fixed or determinable at that time.  Therefore, the Company recognizes revenue when the wholesalers sell Contrave to the dispensing institutions (i.e. pharmacies and hospitals) at which point it has developed sufficient historical experience and data to reasonably estimate future returns and chargebacks. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had a current deferred revenue balance of approximately $700,000 related to Contrave net product sales.

Upon recognition of revenue from product sales of Contrave in the U.S., the Company records certain sales reserves and allowances as a reduction to gross revenue.  These reserves and allowances include:

Rebates:

The Company records provisions for commercial managed care contract rebates and U.S. Medicaid at the time revenue is recognized based upon its estimated rebate claims attributable to a sale. For commercial managed care contract rebates, the Company considers current contract terms, such as changes in formulary status and agreed-to discount rates, along with historical utilization rates. Orexigen also considers outstanding rebate claims, rebate payments, forecasted sales, and levels of inventory in the distribution channel and adjusts estimates each period to reflect actual experience. There can be a significant time lag between recording estimates and actual payments. U.S Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services.

Chargebacks:

The Company provides predetermined discounts under certain government programs, including the Veterans Administration FSS and Public Health Service 340B, whereby the pharmacies or healthcare facilities affiliated with these programs purchase Contrave from wholesalers at reduced prices. A chargeback represents the difference between the invoice price to the wholesaler and the contractual discounted price offered by the Company under the respective program. Our estimate for these chargeback fees takes into consideration contractual terms, historical utilization rates along with payor mix, and our expectations regarding future utilization rates.

Cash Discounts:

The Company offers certain wholesalers cash discounts as an incentive for meeting certain payment terms.   The Company estimates prompt payment discounts based on contractual terms, historical utilization rates, as available, and our expectations regarding future utilization rates.  As the prompt pay discounts are applied against wholesaler purchases of Contrave, the Company records its initial estimate at the point in which that sale occurs.

Distribution Fees:

The distribution fees, based on contractually determined rates, arise from contractual agreements the Company has with certain wholesalers for distribution services they provide with respect to Contrave. These fees are generally a fixed percentage of the price of the product purchased by the wholesalers.

Savings Card Program:

The Company offers certain discount programs to patients under which the patient receives a discount on his or her prescription. The Company reimburses pharmacies for this discount through a third-party vendor. The discounts, which are recorded as a reduction of sales at the point of revenue recognition, reflect an estimate based on historical utilization rates, expectations surrounding future utilization, and user mix in relation to the discount offering.

Sales Returns:

The Company allows the wholesalers to return product that is damaged or received in error. In addition, the Company accepts unused product to be returned beginning six months prior to and ending twelve months following product expiration. Specific rights of return are also extended to certain customers. The Company believes that its estimated product returns for Contrave require a high degree of judgement and are subject to change based on the Company’s experience and certain quantitative and qualitative factors. Because of the shelf life of Contrave and the lengthy return period, there may be a significant period of time between when the product is shipped and when the Company issues credits on returned product.  In order to develop a methodology to reliably estimate future returns, the Company analyzes many factors, including, without limitation: (1) actual Contrave product return history, taking into account product expiration dating at the time of shipment, (2) re-order activities of the wholesalers as well as their customers and (3) levels of inventory in the wholesale channel.  The Company considers the dating of product at the time of shipment into the distribution channel and changes in the estimated levels of inventory within the distribution channel to estimate its exposure to returned product. The Company also considers current contract prices and projected future prices to estimate the exposure to returned product. Given the exposure to returns and the Company’s limited history of selling Contrave in the U.S., the Company recognizes product sales allowances based on these estimates as a reduction of product sales in the same period the related revenue is recognized upon sale of Contrave from the wholesalers to the pharmacies, hospitals, etc.  The Company believes this reduces its exposure to returns and allows the Company to more reasonably justify the estimate. Should actual product return results differ from the Company’s estimates, however, the Company will be required to make adjustments to these allowances in the future, which could have an effect on product sales revenue and earnings in the period of adjustments.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (using a first-in, first-out, or FIFO, basis) and net realizable value. Inventory costs including raw materials, work in process and finished goods that may be associated with the Company’s products prior to regulatory approval are charged to research and development expense prior to such approval on a country-specific basis.

Fair Value Option

The Company has elected the fair value option to account for convertible debt instruments that were issued during both the year ended December 31, 2016 and the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and records this convertible debt at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the statement of operations. As a result of applying the fair value option, direct costs and fees related to the convertible debt were recognized in earnings as incurred and not deferred.

Preferred Stock

When issued, the Company classifies conditionally redeemable preferred shares, which includes preferred shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control, as temporary equity. The Company’s Series Z Preferred Stock (see Note 11) features a contingent right to receive payment from the Company in the event of certain fundamental changes, some of which are not within the Company’s control. Accordingly, the Series Z Preferred Stock is presented as a component of temporary equity.

 

Purchased Intangibles

 

Acquired assets and assumed liabilities recognized in an acquisition are recorded on the basis of their estimated fair values determined by management at the date of acquisition. The Company determines the estimated economic lives of the acquired intangible assets for amortization purposes.

 

Intangible assets consist of developed technology and tradenames acquired in the Contrave business combination under the purchase method of accounting and are recorded at fair value net of accumulated amortization since the acquisition date. Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

 

 

 

Useful Lives

Developed technology

 

 

10 years

Tradename

 

 

10 years

 

The Company reviews its finite-lived intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of finite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of a finite-lived intangible asset is measured by a comparison of its carrying amount to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the asset is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.  There were no indicators of impairment during the period ended September 30, 2017.

 

Contingent Consideration

The Company measures contingent consideration liabilities recognized in connection with business combinations at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  The Company uses a probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach as a valuation technique to determine the fair value of the contingent consideration on the acquisition date. The fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration liability is revalued to fair value each period and any increase or decrease is recorded into earnings. Amounts paid in excess of the amount recorded on the acquisition date will be classified as cash flows used in operating activities. Payments not exceeding the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration will be classified as cash flows used in financing activities.

 

Restricted Cash and Investments

All cash and investments that are legally restricted from use are recorded in restricted cash and investments on the balance sheet. The 0% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2020 issued in March 2016 (see Note 11) require the Company to maintain a minimum account balance which is considered to be restricted cash and investments. The required restricted cash and investment amount was $40.0 million until June 21, 2017, after which such amount was reclassified to Cash and Cash Equivalents on the balance sheet.

 

Change in Accounting Estimates

Sales Returns:

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company completed a review of the estimated return reserve for product sales generated in the U.S.  Based on the Company's analysis of actual product return history, the Company decreased the estimated product returns rate as a percentage of gross U.S. product sales from 1.0% to 0.5%. The decrease in the estimated returns rate was accounted for as a change in accounting estimate and was made on a prospective basis effective July 1, 2017.  For the three months ended September 30, 2017, the adjustment to product returns expense was a decrease of approximately $800,000, which led to an increase in net product revenue and earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and decreased net loss per share by $0.05 for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

At the time of the Company’s business combination to reacquire the commercial rights for Contrave from Takeda effective August 1, 2016, the Company recorded an assumed liability from Takeda for potential product returns of Contrave based on U.S. product sales generated by Takeda from October 2014 through July 2016.  The assumed liability was recorded based on a product returns rate of 1.0% on all sales generated by Takeda.  Based on a change in its estimate, the Company reduced its assumed liability from 1% to 0.5%, effective July 1, 2017.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the adjustment to general and administrative expense, which is included in sales, general and administrative expense, was approximately $1.1 million, which led to a decrease in the operating expenses and net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and decreased net loss per share by $0.07 for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Rebates:

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company completed a review of the commercial rebate historical activity. Based upon the review, the Company refined the estimated commercial rebates due to the mixture of the tier based rates comprising the overall discount rates applied in addition to the volume utilization.  The increase in rebate expense was accounted for as a change in accounting estimate. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, the adjustment to rebate expense was an increase of approximately $847,000, which led to a decrease in net product revenue and earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and increased net loss per share by approximately $0.05 for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendment simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-09 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017. The adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. Under ASU 2016-09, previously unrecognized deferred tax assets were recognized on a modified retrospective basis as of January 1, 2017. As a result of adoption of ASU 2016-09, the Company recorded approximately $4.6 million of additional deferred tax assets, which are fully offset by a valuation allowance.  The Company elected to continue estimating stock-based compensation award forfeitures in determining the amount of compensation cost to be recognized each period.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The standard requires inventory within the scope of the ASU to be measured using the lower of cost and net realizable value. The changes apply to all types of inventory, except those measured using the last-in, first-out method or the retail inventory method, and are intended to more clearly articulate the requirements for the measurement and disclosure of inventory and to simplify the accounting for inventory by eliminating the notions of replacement cost and net realizable value less a normal profit margin. The standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this guidance prospectively for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. The Company previously measured its inventory at the lower of cost or market with cost being determined by the FIFO method. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which outlines a comprehensive revenue recognition model and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. The FASB issued supplemental adoption guidance and clarification to ASU 2014-09 in March 2016, April 2016, May 2016 and December 2016 within ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal vs. Agent Considerations; ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing; ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients; and ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, respectively. The new standard requires a company to recognize revenue upon transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the expected consideration to be received in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step approach for recognizing revenue, which may require a company to use more judgment and make more estimates than under the current guidance. The new standard will be effective for the Company starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The FASB will permit entities to adopt one year earlier if they choose (i.e., the original effective date). The new standard allows for two methods of adoption: (a) full retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all periods presented, or (b) modified retrospective adoption, meaning the cumulative effect of applying the new standard is recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance. The Company plans to adopt the new standard beginning January 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The Company is in the process of performing an assessment of the impact of ASU 2014-09 on the consolidated financial statements, and is considering all items outlined in the standard. The new standard is expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement disclosures. Based on the Company’s assessment to date, the Company expects that the new standard will impact the estimation of sales allowances for the Company’s U.S. product revenues and the timing of revenue recognition, which could be earlier than when the Company is currently recognizing U.S. product revenue. The Company does not expect the new standard to have a material impact on the timing of revenue recognition for product sales outside of the U.S. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of ASU 2014-09 and related amendments on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures throughout 2017.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-2 requires an entity to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its balance sheet for all leases and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Lessees and lessors are required to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2016-02 on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which amends the impairment model by requiring entities to use a forward-looking approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables and available for sale debt securities. The ASU is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this new pronouncement on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows and related disclosures.

 

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash, which outlines that a statement of cash flows explains the change during the period in total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods, and early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, which clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of the award (as equity or liability) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. It is effective prospectively for the annual period ending December 31, 2018 and interim periods within that annual period. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting ASU 2017-11 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.