10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number 000-53203

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND IV, L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	20-5685431
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000 Houston, Texas (Address of Principal Executive Offices)	77046 (Zip Code)
713-850-1400 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Not applicable (Former Name, Former Address and Formal Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page
Definitions			ii
Part I – Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements.	1
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	15
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	20
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	20
Part II – Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	20
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	20
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	21
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	21
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	21
	Item 5.	Other Information.	21
	Item 6.	Exhibits.	21
Signatures			22
Exhibit Index			23

i

DEFINITIONS

          As used in this Quarterly Report, the following abbreviations and terms have the meanings as listed below. Additionally, the terms “we,” “our,” “MIG IV,” the “Partnership” and “us” refer collectively to AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P. and its subsidiaries, including joint ventures, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

ABBREVIATION	DEFINITION
AmREIT	AmREIT, Inc., a Maryland corporation and parent of our General Partner.
ARIC	AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary of AmREIT.
CEO	Chief Executive Officer.
CFO	Chief Financial Officer.
Exchange Act	Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
GAAP	U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
General Partner	AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmREIT.
GLA	Gross leasable area.
LIBOR	London interbank offered rate.
Limited Partners	Owners / holders of our Units.
MIG III	AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd., an affiliated entity.
NYSE	New York Stock Exchange.
Offering	Both the issuance and sale of our initial 40 Units pursuant to the terms of a private placement memorandum dated November 15, 2006, and the subsequent sale of Units through March 31, 2008 (a total of 1,991 Units).
Partners	Collectively our General Partner and Limited Partners.
REIT	Real Estate Investment Trust.
SEC	Securities and Exchange Commission.
Securities Act	Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Units	Limited partnership units sold in our Offering.
Quarterly Report	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

ii

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND IV, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except Unit data)

	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Real estate investments at cost:
Land	$	7,561		$	12,613
Buildings		12,924			14,483
Tenant improvements		345			4,678
		20,830			31,774
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,694	)		(2,408	)
		18,136			29,366
Investment in non-consolidated entities		7,166			9,222
Acquired lease intangibles, net		24			35
Net real estate investments		25,326			38,623
Cash and cash equivalents		5,495			129
Tenant and accounts receivables, net		93			295
Accounts receivable - related party		304			75
Notes receivable, net		8			—
Deferred costs, net		53			576
Other assets		291			138
TOTAL ASSETS	$	31,570		$	39,836
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
Liabilities:
Notes payable	$	5,820		$	12,140
Notes payable - related party		2,907			3,658
Accounts payable and other liabilities		447			459
Accounts payable - related party		301			405
Acquired below-market lease intangibles, net		4			6
Security deposits		43			41
TOTAL LIABILITIES		9,522			16,709
Capital:
Partners’ capital:
General partner		—			—
Limited partners, 1,988 Units outstanding at
September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		15,987			16,333
TOTAL PARTNERS’ CAPITAL		15,987			16,333
Non-controlling interests		6,061			6,794
TOTAL CAPITAL		22,048			23,127
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL	$	31,570		$	39,836

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND IV, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except for per Unit data)
(unaudited)

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases	$	265		$	255		$	761		$	817
Total revenues		265			255			761			817
Expenses:
General and administrative		30			27			67			68
General and administrative - related party		75			78			208			213
Asset management fees - related party		38			38			115			115
Property expense		158			139			349			389
Property management fees - related party		12			12			35			34
Legal and professional		42			44			158			198
Depreciation and amortization		147			128			406			387
Total operating expenses		502			466			1,338			1,404
Operating loss		(237	)		(211	)		(577	)		(587	)
Other income (expense):
Interest and other income		11			—			12			—
Interest expense		(115	)		(127	)		(344	)		(358	)
Income (loss) from non-consolidated entities		1,565			(324	)		1,250			(876	)
Margin tax benefit (expense)		6			—			6			—
Total other income (expense)		1,467			(451	)		924			(1,234	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		1,230			(662	)		347			(1,821	)
Loss from discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from real estate operations		170			(8	)		359			(25	)
Loss on sale of real estate		(576	)		—			(576	)		—
Loss from discontinued operations		(406	)		(8	)		(217	)		(25	)
Net income (loss), including non-controlling interests		824			(670	)		130			(1,846	)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests		(501	)		42			(476	)		131
Net income (loss) attributable to partners	$	323		$	(628	)	$	(346	)	$	(1,715	)
Weighted average Units outstanding		1,988			1,988			1,988			1,988
Net loss per Unit
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	618.71		$	(333.00	)	$	174.55		$	(916.00	)
Loss from discontinued opertations	$	(204.23	)	$	(4.02	)	$	(109.15	)	$	(12.58	)
(Income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests	$	(252.01	)	$	21.13		$	(239.44	)	$	65.90
Net income (loss) attributable to partners	$	162.47		$	(315.90	)	$	(174.04	)	$	(862.68	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND IV, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CAPITAL
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

	Partners’ Capital
	General Partner		Limited Partners			Non-Controlling Interests			Total
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	—	$	16,333		$	6,794		$	23,127
Net income (loss) attributable to partners (1)		—		(346	)		476			130
Contributions from non-controlling interests		—		—			146			146
Distributions to non-controlling interests		—		—			(1,355	)		(1,355	)
Balance at September 30, 2013	$	—	$	15,987		$	6,061		$	22,048

(1) The allocation of net income includes a curative allocation to increase the General Partner’s capital account by $3 for the period. The cumulative curative allocation since inception of the Partnership is $276. The Partnership Agreement provides that no Partner shall be required to fund a deficit balance in their capital account.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND IV, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss), including non-controlling interests	$	130		$	(1,846	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Loss on sale of property		576			—
Bad debt expense		16			30
Loss (income) from non-consolidated entities		(1,250	)		876
Depreciation and amortization		508			400
Decrease (increase) in tenant and accounts receivable		(342	)		92
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable - related party		(92	)		(85	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(153	)		(123	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities		38			(309	)
Increase in accounts payable - related party		171			583
Increase (decrease) in security deposits		2			(2	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(396	)		(384	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Improvements to real estate		(558	)		(3,785	)
Payments received on notes receivable		14			—
Investment in non-consolidated entities		(240	)		(938	)
Distributions from non-consolidated entities		3,573			94
Net proceeds from sale of interest in an investment property		11,584			—
Net proceeds applied to land basis		108			108
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		14,481			(4,521	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable		460			3,694
Payments on notes payable		(6,780	)		(67	)
Proceeds from notes payable - related party		860			892
Payments on notes payable - related party		(2,050	)		—
Contributions from non-controlling interests		146			97
Distributions to non-controlling interests		(1,355	)		—
Net cash provided by (used) in financing activities		(8,719	)		4,616
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5,366			(289	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		129			422
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	5,495		$	133
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	415		$	251
Taxes	$	6		$	6
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Capitalization of accrued property taxes into the basis of our land at Woodlake Pointe	$	192		$	144
Reclassification from accounts payable - related party to notes payable - related party	$	439		$	580
Reclassification from accounts receivable to notes receivable	$	137		$	—
Construction fees included in accounts payable	$	27		$	95

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND IV, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(unaudited)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

General

          We are a Delaware limited partnership formed on October 10, 2006, to acquire, develop and operate, directly or indirectly through joint venture arrangements, a portfolio of commercial real estate consisting primarily of multi-tenant shopping centers and mixed-use developments. Our General Partner is a subsidiary of AmREIT, an SEC reporting, Maryland corporation that is publicly traded on the NYSE and that has elected to be taxed as a REIT. As of September 30, 2013, our investments included a wholly-owned property comprised of approximately 36,306 square feet of GLA, a property in which we own a controlling interest comprised of approximately 82,120 square feet of GLA and three properties in which we own a non-controlling interest through joint ventures comprised of approximately 938,000 square feet of GLA.

          Our operating period will continue until November 15, 2013 (our scheduled liquidation commencement date); however, the operating period may be extended to November 15, 2015 with the consent of holders of the majority of Units held by our Limited Partners. Once the liquidation period commences, we will not invest in any new real estate without approval of our limited partners. An orderly liquidation of all of our properties and wind-down of our operations will likely take years for our General Partner to complete. Because liquidation was not imminent as of September 30, 2013, the financial statements are presented assuming we continue as a going concern.

Economic Conditions and Liquidity

          Over the past several years, our results of operations and valuations of our real estate assets have been negatively impacted by overall economic conditions from the recent, severe recession. Most of our retail properties were purchased prior to 2008 when retail real estate market prices were much higher, and our property valuations were negatively impacted by these market dynamics. The United States has experienced recent improvements in the general economy; however, high levels of unemployment have persisted, and rental rates and valuations for retail space have not fully recovered to pre-recession levels and may not for a number of years. As a result, we have faced significant liquidity challenges over the last several years. However, we have been successful in meeting our historic cash shortfalls through (1) managing the timing of forecasted capital expenditures related to the lease-up of properties, (2) managing the timing of operating expense payments and, to the extent possible, accelerating cash collections, (3) deferring the payment of fees owed to our General Partner and its affiliates, (4) selling certain of our properties and investments in non-consolidated entities (see Notes 3 and 4) and/or (5) obtaining funds through additional borrowings from AmREIT.

          As of September 30, 2013, we have $5.5 million in cash on hand and our liquidity has improved due to the sale of Woodlake Square and our Woodlake Pointe joint venture’s sale of a portion of its Woodlake Pointe property. During 2013, we have repaid approximately $4.0 million of our notes payable –related party (including a payment made October 1, 2013).

          We expect to fund approximately $1.5 million in capital expenditures over the next two years at our Casa Linda property (a 50% joint venture between us and MIG III) representing our 50% share of a lease-up strategy at this property. The $38.0 million mortgage on the property matures in January 2014.We have engaged a mortgage broker to assist us with refinancing this loan and have recently selected a lender based upon preliminary terms for a non-recourse loan with an initial funding of $38.0 million and a future funding of approximately $4.5 million for the potential acquisition of an adjacent property. The proposed terms of the loan are a term of four years with a one-year extension, interest at the 3-Month LIBOR plus a spread of 3.50% and interest-only payments for the first two years with monthly payments of interest and principal based upon a 30-year amortization thereafter, with the balance due upon maturity. We expect the joint venture to close on the loan during the fourth quarter of 2013.

5

          On September 30, 2013, our Woodlake Pointe joint venture sold a portion of the land and a single tenant building at our Woodlake Pointe property for $12.0 million to an unrelated third party. The sale resulted in net proceeds of $4.9 million after payoff of a $6.6 million mortgage and other closing costs. Our portion of the net cash proceeds, which was 60%, was $3.0 million. We plan to use the proceeds to fund the Casa Linda lease-up strategy, pay down a portion of our note payable to AmREIT and for working capital needs. We recorded a loss on sale of $576,000 primarily related to bad debt expense associated with the write-off of accrued rent.

          On September 18, 2013, VIF II/AmREIT Woodlake, LP (“Woodlake LP”), sold Woodlake Square, a grocery-anchored, multi-tenant retail shopping center, to AmREIT for $41.6 million. We received approximately $2.0 million representing our proportional share, which is 6% of the net proceeds once the final distribution is made.

          There is no guarantee that we and our joint ventures will be successful with the above liquidity initiatives, and we may continue to look to AmREIT to provide additional financial support to us to meet our operating cash needs. We can provide no assurance that AmREIT will be able to provide additional support, if needed. Historically, AmREIT has deferred payment of advisory fees earned to the extent such deferrals of fees were necessary for our continued operation. Such fees included property management, asset management, development fees, interest expense on amounts owed to AmREIT and reimbursements of certain of AmREIT’s general and administrative costs. Additionally, AmREIT has agreed that it will not require us to repay the remaining balance of our notes payable – related party to it until a date subsequent to January 1, 2014 if such repayment were to prevent the execution of our strategy or present an unnecessary financial hardship to us. AmREIT’s agreement to provide such financial support and defer payment is limited to its continued ability to do so.

Strategic Plan

          We have created a strategic plan to maximize value prior to and during our upcoming liquidation period. The components of our strategic plan are as follows:

• Complete our development and redevelopment projects with a goal to stabilize these projects over the next 6-12 months. We believe that completing our development and redevelopment projects including their lease-up and stabilization will allow us to maximize the return on these properties upon sale. Our investment in Cambridge & Holcombe represents our only investment property currently under development/redevelopment. See Note 4 for further discussion of the redevelopment plans at this property.

• Continue to operate our projects in a first-class manner with a goal to generate operating cash flow in order to re-commence distributions. We believe that the stabilization of our development and redevelopment properties, coupled with the continued and intense oversight of our operating properties, will generate liquidity that could allow us to re-commence distributions to our Limited Partners; however, we expect this will most likely occur during the liquidation phase. Once we begin our liquidation period, an orderly liquidation of our assets and wind-down of our operations will likely take several years for our General Partner to complete.

• Sell our properties opportunistically as the market continues to recover. Our recent sales by our joint venture of Woodlake Square and the portion of land and single tenant building at Woodlake Pointe are recent examples of our execution of this strategy. However, once a property is marketed for sale, it may take several months to receive offers and complete due diligence by both parties. Our General Partner will in good faith begin to review market sales opportunities for our operating properties at the conclusion of our operating period, but retail property valuations may continue to be challenged, and, accordingly, attractive sales opportunities may not exist in the near term. When deciding whether or when to sell properties, our General Partner will consider factors such as potential appreciation of value, and timing of cash flows. During the liquidation period, we will be distributing net proceeds generated from property sales to our Limited Partners unless the General Partner has identified attractive acquisition opportunities and obtained a majority vote of the Limited Partners to re-invest such proceeds.

6

          Although we believe that our strategic plan maximizes the value of our properties and is in the best interest of our Limited Partners, no assurances can be given that this strategy will be successful, and it is possible that investors may not recover all of their original investment.

          The above steps may not be sufficient, and we could incur individual setbacks and possibly significant losses. Additional deterioration in the United States economy or the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more of our significant tenants could cause our current plans to meet our projected cash shortfalls to be insufficient. Even with the above strategic plan and liquidity initiatives, we still may incur cash shortfalls if we are required to perform under certain guarantees (see Note 5) of our joint ventures or are unable to refinance certain debt as it comes due, which could result in lender repossession of one or more properties owned by us and/or our joint ventures or be forced to sell one or more properties at a time when it is disadvantageous to do so, potentially resulting in losses on the disposition of those properties.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

          Our financial records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when incurred. The consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as the accounts of any wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. Investments in joint ventures and partnerships in which we have the ability to exercise significant influence but do not exercise financial and operating control are accounted for using the equity method (see Note 4). The significant accounting policies of our non-consolidated entities are consistent with those of our subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. As of September 30, 2013, we do not have any interests in variable interest entities. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

          The consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and are unaudited. In our opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements have been included. Such adjustments consisted of normal recurring items. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the SEC rules and regulations and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Reclassifications

          Certain immaterial reclassfications from have been made to our our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 to conform to current period presentation. The items had no impact on previously reported net income (loss), our Consolidated Balance Sheet or Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow. See also Note 3 for a discussion of our presentation of discontinued operations.

Use of Estimates

          The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

7

Cash and Cash Equivalents

          We consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds.

Revenue Recognition

          Rental income from operating leases – We lease space to tenants under agreements with varying terms. Our leases are accounted for as operating leases, and, although certain leases of the properties provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due and/or for changes in the minimum lease payments over the terms of the leases, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the individual leases. Revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, possession or control occurs on the lease commencement date. In cases where significant tenant improvements are made prior to lease commencement, the leased asset is considered to be the finished space, and revenue recognition therefore begins when the improvements are substantially complete. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes, maintenance expenses and insurance is recognized in the period the related expense is recorded. Additionally, certain of our lease agreements contain provisions that grant additional rents based upon tenants’ sales volumes (contingent or percentage rent). Percentage rents are recognized when the tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in their lease agreements. Accrued rents are included in tenant and accounts receivable, net.

Receivables and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

          Tenant and Accounts Receivable, net - Included in tenant and accounts receivable are base rents, tenant reimbursements and adjustments related to recording rents on a straight-line basis. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued rents and accounts receivable is determined based upon customer credit-worthiness (including expected recovery of our claim with respect to any tenants in bankruptcy), historical bad debt levels, and current economic trends. Bad debt expenses and any related recoveries related to tenant receivables are included in property expense. As of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, our allowance for uncollectible accounts related to our tenant receivables was $11,000 and $32,000, respectively.

          Accounts Receivable - Related Party - Included in accounts receivable - related party are short-term cash advances provided to certain of our affiliated investment entities primarily for their working capital needs. These cash advances are due upon demand.

Development Properties

          Expenditures related to the development of real estate are capitalized as part of construction in progress, which includes carrying charges, primarily interest, real estate taxes and loan acquisition costs, and direct and indirect development costs related to buildings under construction. The capitalization of such costs ceases at the earlier of one year from the date of completion of major construction or when the property, or any completed portion, becomes available for occupancy. We capitalize costs associated with pending acquisitions of raw land as incurred and expense such costs if and when the acquisition of the property becomes no longer probable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we capitalized interest and property taxes in the amount of $192,000 and $172,000, respectively.

Depreciation

          Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of up to 39 years for buildings, up to 11 years for site improvements and over the term of the lease for tenant improvements. We re-evaluate the useful lives of our buildings and improvements as warranted by changing conditions at our properties. As part of this re-evaluation, we may also consider whether such changing conditions indicate a potential impairment, and we perform an impairment analysis, as necessary, at the property level. In the case of a property redevelopment, we reassess the useful lives of specific buildings or other improvements to be demolished as part of that redevelopment once the redevelopment is probable of occurring.

8

Impairment

          We review our properties for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets, including acquired lease intangibles and accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. We determine whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the property, with the carrying value of the individual property. If impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Both the estimated undiscounted cash flow analysis and fair value determination are based upon various factors that require complex and subjective judgments to be made by management. Such assumptions include projecting lease-up periods, holding periods, cap rates, rental rates, operating expenses, lease terms, tenant creditworthiness, tenant improvement allowances, terminal sales value and certain macroeconomic factors among other assumptions to be made for each property. For our multi-building retail centers, we consider the entire retail center as the asset group for purposes of our impairment analysis. We review our investments in non-consolidated entities for impairment based on a similar review of the properties held by the investee entity. No impairment charges were recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value Measurements

          GAAP emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. GAAP requires the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. Observable inputs are inputs that the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of ours. When market data inputs are unobservable, we utilize inputs that we believe reflect our best estimate of the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs that are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Partnership has the ability to access.

• Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

• Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on the Partnership’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

          Recurring Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments – Our consolidated financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, tenant and accounts receivable, accounts receivable – related party, notes payable, notes payable – related party, accounts payable – related party, and accounts payable and other liabilities. The carrying values of all of the financial instruments, except for our notes payable are representative of the fair values due to the short-term nature of the instruments. See Note 5 for fair value disclosures of our notes payable.

Subsequent Events

          On October 1, 2013, we repaid $1.9 million on the note payable – related party to AmREIT.

          Except as disclosed above, we did not have any additional material subsequent events as of the date of this filing that impacted our consolidated financial statements.

9

3. ASSET DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

          On September 30, 2013, our Woodlake Pointe joint venture sold a portion of the Woodlake Pointe property consisting of land and a building for $12.0 million to an unrelated third party. The sale resulted in net proceeds of $4.9 million after payoff of a $6.6 million mortgage and other closing costs. Our 60% portion of the net cash proceeds was $3.0 million. We plan to use the proceeds to fund the Casa Linda lease-up strategy, pay down a portion of our note payable to AmREIT and for working capital needs.

          We have presented the operating results of this property as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. A summary of our discontinued operations for the periods presented is detailed below:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases	$	263		$	—		$	882		$	—
Total revenues		263			—			882			—
Expenses:
Property expense		2			2			190			3
Legal and professional		30			1			56			8
Depreciation and amortization		—			—			94			—
Total operating expenses		32			3			340			11
Operating income (loss)		231			(3	)		542			(11	)
Other expense:
Interest expense		(61	)		(5	)		(183	)		(14	)
Total other expense		(61	)		(5	)		(183	)		(14	)
Income (loss) from real estate operations		170			(8	)		359			(25	)
Loss on sale of real estate(1)		(576	)		—			(576	)		—
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(406	)	$	(8	)	$	(217	)	$	(25	)

(1) The loss on sale primarily relates to bad debt expense associated with the write-off of accrued rent.

4. INVESTMENT IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

          As of September 30, 2013, we have investments in three entities that are accounted for using the equity method of accounting due to our ability to exercise significant influence over them. Our investment balances as reported on our consolidated balance sheet are as follows (in thousands):

Investment	Ownership		September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Casa Linda	50	%	$	2,329	$	2,707
Cambridge & Holcombe	50	%		838		675
Shadow Creek Ranch	10	%		3,999		4,214
Woodlake Square	6	%		—		1,626
Total			$	7,166	$	9,222

10

          Casa Linda - We own a 50% interest in AmREIT Casa Linda, LP, which owns Casa Linda Plaza, a multi-tenant retail property located in Dallas, Texas with a combined GLA of approximately 325,000 square feet. The remaining 50% is owned by MIG III. The property is secured by a $38.0 million, seven-year mortgage loan that matures January 2014. The loan bears an annual interest rate of 5.48% and is interest-only until maturity. We have engaged a mortgage broker to assist us with refinancing this loan and have recently selected a lender based upon preliminary terms for a non-recourse loan with an initial funding of $38.0 million and a future funding of approximately $4.5 million for the potential acquisition of an adjacent property. The proposed terms of the loan are a term of four years with a one-year extension, interest at the 3-Month LIBOR plus a spread of 3.50% and interest-only payments for the first two years with monthly payments of interest and principal based upon a 30-year amortization thereafter, with the balance due upon maturity. We expect the joint venture to close on the loan during the fourth quarter of 2013. We expect to fund approximately $1.5 million in capital expenditures over the next two years at our Casa Linda property (a 50% joint venture between us and MIG III) representing our 50% share of a lease-up strategy at this property.

          Cambridge & Holcombe - We own a 50% interest in Cambridge & Holcombe, LP, which owns 2.02 acres of raw land that may be developed, sold or contributed to a joint venture in the future. The property is located adjacent to the Texas Medical Center in Houston, Texas. The remaining 50% is owned by an unaffiliated third party. In June 2011, the $8.1 million loan matured unpaid. On April 26, 2012, we successfully extended this debt until March 27, 2013 in exchange for a 10% principal reduction on the note and payment of accrued interest, which expired. Our 50% portion of this payment was $536,000, which was funded through a loan from AmREIT. We closed on a second extension of the loan on May 17, 2013. The extended loan matures in March 2015. In connection with this extension, we and our joint venture partner entered into a joint and several guaranty of up to 60% of the loan balance. The joint venture entered into a contract to sell one acre of the property to a third party, subject to a due diligence period that expired in December 2012. The third party elected not to purchase the land, and the contract expired. Approximately $325,000 in escrow deposits was forfeited by the third party, which we used to fund debt service on the loan for the past several months. We are currently marketing the property for sale and have received offers for the purchase of all or a portion of the property.

          Shadow Creek Ranch - We own a 10% interest in Shadow Creek Holding Company LLC, which owns Shadow Creek Ranch, a multi-tenant retail property located in Pearland, Texas with a combined GLA of approximately 613,000 square feet. The remaining 90% is owned by an unaffiliated third party (80%) and AmREIT (10%). The property is secured by a loan in the amount of $65.0 million at an annual interest rate of 5.48% until its maturity in March 2015.

          Woodlake Square – As of December 31, 2012, we owned a 6% interest in Woodlake LP, which owned Woodlake Square, a grocery-anchored, multi-tenant retail property located at the corner of Westheimer and Gessner in Houston, Texas with a combined GLA of approximately 161,000 square feet. The remaining 94% was owned by the third-party institutional partner (90%), ARIC (1%) and by MIG III (3%). On September 18, 2013, Woodlake LP sold Woodlake Square to AmREIT for $41.6 million based on arms-length negotiations between AmREIT and our third party institutional partner that owned a 90% interest in the property. The joint venture recorded a gain on sale of $10.4 million. Our share of this gain is included in our income (loss) from non-consolidated entities. We received approximately $2.0 million representing our proportional share of the net proceeds.

          Combined condensed financial information for the underlying investee entities (at 100%) is summarized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenue	$	4,545		$	4,247		$	14,251		$	12,841
Gain on sale of real estate		10,532			—			10,532			528
Depreciation and amortization		(1,661	)		(1,738	)		(5,088	)		(5,297	)
Interese expense		(1,588	)		(1,657	)		(4,862	)		(5,012	)
Net income (loss)		10,177			(930	)		9,415			(2,084	)

5. NOTES PAYABLE

          Our outstanding debt as of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, was as follows (in thousands).

Notes payable	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Village on the Green	$	5,820	$	5,891
Woodlake Pointe		—		6,249
Total	$	5,820	$	12,140

11

          The Village on the Green note payable is a fixed rate mortgage loan that bears interest at 5.5% and matures in April 2017. It may be prepaid, but is subject to a yield-maintenance premium or prepayment penalty. Our Woodlake Pointe construction loan was paid in full upon the sale of the property on September 30, 2013. See Note 3. As of September 30, 2013, we serve as the guarantor of debt in the amount of $24.2 million that is the primary obligation of our non-consolidated joint ventures. The debt for which we serve as guarantor matures in 2014 and 2015. We have not accrued any liability with respect to these guarantees as we believe it is unlikely we would be required to perform and, therefore, the fair value of any obligation would be insignificant.

          Notes Payable – Related Party – As of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the balance of our notes payable – related party was $2.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively. The note accrues interest monthly at 2.78% and is secured by our investment interest in the Woodlake Pointe property. On October 1, 2013, we made a payment of $1.9 million.

          Fair Value of Notes Payable – We record our debt instruments based on contractual terms, net of any applicable premium or discount on our consolidated balance sheet. We did not elect to apply the alternative GAAP provisions of the fair value option for recording financial assets and financial liabilities. The fair value of our variable-rate notes payable approximate their carrying value. In determining the fair value of our fixed-rate debt instruments, we determine the appropriate treasury note rate based on the remaining time to maturity for each of the debt instruments. We then add the appropriate yield spread to the treasury note rate. The yield spread is a risk premium estimated by investors to account for credit risk involved in debt financing. The spread is typically estimated based on the property type and loan-to-value ratio of the debt instrument. The result is an estimate of the market interest rate a typical investor would expect to receive given the underlying subject asset (property type) and remaining time to maturity. The fair value of our fixed-rate notes payable is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Based on these estimates, the fair value of fixed-rate notes payable was approximately $6.3 million as of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012.

6. CONCENTRATIONS

          As of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, each of our two consolidated properties individually comprised greater than 10% of our consolidated total assets. Consistent with our strategy of investing in areas that we know well, both properties are located in Texas metropolitan areas. These Texas properties represent 100% of our rental income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The following table details the base rents generated by our top tenants during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
Tenant	2013		2012		2013		2012
LA Fitness (1)	$	241	$	—	$	720	$	—
Paesano’s		39		49		148		148
Alamo Heights Pediatrics		18		18		53		53
Rouse Dental		20		14		48		42
Café Salsita		7		9		26		28
Total	$	325	$	90	$	995	$	271

(1) LA Fitness occupied the newly constructed building at our Woodlake Pointe property, which was sold on September 30, 2013. See Note 3. We will receive no further rent from this tenant in future reporting periods.

12

7. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

          Distributions –We suspended all distribution payments in July 2009 and do not anticipate reinstating distributions until we have stabilized our properties and we generate liquidity that could allow us to re-commence distributions. See Note 1. All distributions to date have been a return of capital. During our liquidation stage (anticipated to commence in November 2013, unless extended), net cash flows, will be distributed among the Limited Partners and the General Partner in the following manner:

• First - 100% to the Limited Partners (in proportion to their unreturned actual invested capital) until such time as the limited partners have received cumulative distributions from all sources equal to 100% of their actual invested capital (calculated using the actual purchase price per Unit);

• Second - 100% to the General Partner until it has received cumulative distributions from all sources equal to 100% of its actual invested capital of $1,000;

• Third - 1% to the General Partner and 99% to the Limited Partners on a per Unit basis until such time as the Limited Partners have received cumulative distributions from all sources equal to 8.5% per annum, cumulative, uncompounded return on their unreturned deemed capital contributions (which will be equal to (i) the product of $25,000 per Unit (regardless of the purchase price paid for a Unit) multiplied by the number of Units owned by a partner, reduced by (ii) the aggregate amount of any distributions received that constitute a return of capital contributions);

• Fourth – 100% to the General Partner until it has received cumulative distributions from all sources (other than with respect to the Units it purchased) in an amount equal to 40% of the net cash flow paid to date to the Limited Partners in excess of their actual invested capital; and

• Thereafter - 60% to the Limited Partners on a per Unit basis and 40% to the General Partner.

          Non-controlling Interests – Non-controlling interests includes a 40% ownership interest that our affiliates have in our Woodlake Pointe property and a 40% interest that our affiliates have in our investment in Woodlake HoldCo that we consolidate as a result of our 60% controlling financial interest.

8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

          Certain of our affiliates receive fees for ongoing property management and administrative services. In the event that these companies are unable to provide us with the respective services, we would be required to find alternative providers of these services. The following table summarizes the amount of such compensation incurred by us during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
Type of service	2013		2012		2013		2012
Asset management fees	$	38	$	38	$	115	$	115
Property management fees		12		12		35		34
Leasing costs		—		2		8		98
Development costs		—		86		—		258
Interest expense-related party		64		44		96		106
Administrative cost reimbursements		75		78		208		213
	$	189	$	260	$	462	$	824

          In addition to the above fees incurred by us, the non-consolidated entities in which we have investments paid $653,000 and $979,000 in property management and leasing fees to one of our affiliated entities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See also Note 4 regarding investments in non-consolidated entities.

13

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

          Litigation - In the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to litigation or claims. There are no material pending legal proceedings against us.

          Environmental matters - In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, we may be potentially liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. We are not aware of any pending environmental proceedings with respect to our properties that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

14

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

          The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

          Certain information presented in this Quarterly Report constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to the following: changes in general economic conditions, changes in real estate market conditions, continued availability of proceeds from our debt or equity capital, our ability to locate suitable tenants for our properties, the ability of tenants to make payments under their respective leases, timing of acquisitions, development starts and sales of properties, the ability to meet development and redevelopment schedules and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made, and we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time.

OVERVIEW

          We are a Delaware limited partnership formed to acquire, develop and operate, directly or indirectly through joint venture arrangements, a portfolio of commercial real estate consisting primarily of multi-tenant shopping centers and mixed-use properties. Our Units are not currently listed on a securities exchange, and there currently is no established public trading market for our Units. We do not intend to list our Units at this time and have no plans to list our Units on a securities exchange in the future.

          Our general partner is a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmREIT, an SEC reporting, Maryland corporation that is publicly traded on the NYSE and that has elected to be taxed as a REIT. Our General Partner has the exclusive right to manage our business and affairs on a day-to-day basis pursuant to our limited partnership agreement. The Limited Partners have the right to remove and replace our General Partner, with or without cause, by a vote of the Limited Partners owning a majority of the outstanding Units (excluding any Units held by our General Partner). Our General Partner is responsible for all of our investment decisions, including decisions relating to the properties to be developed, the method and timing of financing or refinancing the properties, the selection of tenants, the terms of the leases, the method and timing of the sale of our properties and the reinvestment of net sales proceeds. Our General Partner utilizes the services of AmREIT and its affiliates in performing its duties under our limited partnership agreement.

          As of September 30, 2013, our consolidated investments include one wholly-owned property comprised of approximately 36,306 square feet of GLA and one majority owned property comprised of approximately 82,120 square feet of GLA and three properties in which we own a non-controlling interest through joint ventures comprised of approximately 938,000 square feet of GLA. Rental income accounted for 100% of our total revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, primarily from net leasing arrangements where most of the operating expenses of the properties are absorbed by our tenants. As a result, our operating results and cash flows are primarily influenced by rental income from our properties and interest expense on our property indebtedness. As of September 30, 2013, our properties had an average occupancy of 98.6%.

          Our operating period will continue until November 15, 2013 (our scheduled liquidation commencement date); however, an orderly liquidation of all of our properties and wind down of our operations will likely take several years for our General Partner to complete. Once we enter into our liquidation period, we will not invest in any new real estate without approval of our Limited Partners.

          Over the past several years, our results of operations and valuations of our real estate assets have been negatively impacted by overall economic conditions from the recent, severe recession. Most of our retail properties were purchased prior to 2008 when retail real estate market prices were much higher, and our property valuations were negatively impacted by these market dynamics. The United States has experienced recent improvements in the general economy; however, high levels of unemployment have persisted, and rental rates and valuations for retail space have not fully recovered to pre-recession levels and may not for a number of years. As a result, we have faced significant liquidity challenges over the last several years. However, we have been successful in meeting our historic cash shortfalls through (1) managing the timing of forecasted capital expenditures related to the lease-up of properties, (2) managing the timing of operating expense payments and, to the extent possible, accelerating cash collections, (3) deferring the payment of fees owed to our General Partner and its affiliates, (4) selling certain of our properties and investments in non-consolidated entities (see Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and/or (5) obtaining funds through additional borrowings from AmREIT.

15

          As of September 30, 2013, we have $5.5 million in cash on hand and our liquidity has improved due to the sale of Woodlake Square and the Woodlake Pointe joint venture’s sale of a portion of its Woodlake Pointe property. See also Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements related to our property dispositions. During 2013, we have repaid approximately $4.0 million of our notes payable –related party (including a payment made October 1, 2013). We expect that our cash on hand should be sufficient to allow us to execute our strategy in the near term.

          We have created a strategic plan to maximize value prior to and during our upcoming liquidation period. The components of our strategic plan are as follows:

• Complete our development and redevelopment projects with a goal to stabilize these projects over the next 6-12 months. We believe that completing our development and redevelopment projects including their lease-up and stabilization will allow us to maximize the return on these properties upon sale. Our investment in Cambridge & Holcombe represents our only investment property currently under development/redevelopment. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the redevelopment plans at this property.

• Continue to operate our projects in a first-class manner with a goal to generate operating cash flow in order to re-commence distributions. We believe that the stabilization of our development and redevelopment properties, coupled with the continued and intense oversight of our operating properties, will generate liquidity that could allow us to re-commence distributions to our Limited Partners; however, we expect this will most likely occur during the liquidation phase. Once we begin our liquidation period, an orderly liquidation of our assets and wind-down of our operations will likely take several years for our General Partner to complete.

• Sell our properties opportunistically as the market continues to recover. Our sales by our Woodlake Squre and Woodlake Pointe joint ventures are recent examples of our execution of this strategy. However, once a property is marketed for sale, it may take several months to receive offers and complete due diligence by both parties. Our General Partner will in good faith begin to review market sales opportunities for our operating properties at the conclusion of our operating period, but retail property valuations may continue to be challenged, and, accordingly, attractive sales opportunities may not exist in the near term. When deciding whether or when to sell properties, our General Partner will consider factors such as potential appreciation of value, and timing of cash flows. During the liquidation period, we will be distributing net proceeds generated from property sales to our Limited Partner unless the General Partner has identified attractive acquisition opportunities and obtained a majority vote of the Limited Partners to re-invest such proceeds.

          Although we believe that our strategic plan maximizes the value of our properties and is in the best interest of our Limited Partners, no assurance can be given that this strategy will be successful, and it is possible that investors may not recover all of their original investment.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

          Below is a discussion of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012.

16

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013, to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

          Revenue. Revenue remained comparable for the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 with an increase of $10,000, or 4%.

          Income (loss) from non-consolidated entities. Income (loss) from non-consolidated entities increased approximately $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 (income of $1,565,000 versus a loss of $324,000). These amounts represent our ownership portion of our joint ventures’ net income or loss for the period. The resulting increase in income is primarily related to 1) our portion of the gain on sale of Woodlake Square of approximately $10.5 million with our pro rata share of the gain representing approximately $1,050,000 and 2) increased income and lease-up of our properties within our investments in Casa Linda and Woodlake Square (prior to its sale) as compared to the respective period in 2012. See further discussion of our sale of our investment in Woodlake Square as discussed in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          Loss from discontinued operations. Loss from discontinued operations increased approximately $398,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 ($406,000 loss in 2013 versus a loss of $8,000 in 2012). The increase is due to the loss on the sale of a portion of the land and single tenant building at our Woodlake Pointe property of $576,000, partially offset by increased income from the single tenant at our Woodlake Pointe property, which opened for business during the fourth quarter of 2012.

          Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests. Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests increased approximately $543,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 (income of $501,000 in 2013 versus a loss of $42,000 in 2012). This amount represents the 40% interest in the Woodlake Pointe property and the 40% interest in Woodlake Holdco (owns our investment in Woodlake Square) that we do not own, but that we consolidate in our financial statements. The increase in income was recognized from our equity portion of the gain on sale of Woodlake Square property offset by the loss from the sale of a portion of the land and single tenant building at our Woodlake Pointe property.

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013, to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

          Revenue. Revenue decreased approximately $56,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 ($761,000 in 2013 versus $817,000 in 2012). The decrease is primarily due to a favorable resolution of prior year common area maintenance recoveries received during the first quarter of 2012 with no comparable amount in 2013.

          Property expense. Property expense decreased approximately $40,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 ($349,000 in 2013 versus $389,000 in 2012). The decrease is primarily due to bad debt expense for the second quarter of 2012. We did not have any such bad debt expense in the second quarter of 2013.

          Legal and professional. Legal and professional expense decreased approximately $40,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 ($158,000 in 2013 versus $198,000 in 2012). The decrease is primarily due to litigation fees that we incurred in 2012 resulting from the collection of outstanding receivables.

          Income (loss) from non-consolidated entities. Income (loss) from non-consolidated entities increased approximately $2.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 (income of $1,250,000 in 2013 versus a loss of $876,000 in 2012). These amounts represent our ownership portion of our joint ventures’ net income or loss for the period. The resulting increase in income is primarily related to 1) our portion of the gain on sale of Woodlake Square of approximately $10.5 million with our pro rata share of the gain representing approximately $1,050,000 and 2) increased income associated with the lease-up of Casa Linda and Woodlake Square (prior to its sale) properties as compared to the respective period in 2012. See further discussion of the sale of our investment in Woodlake Square in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

17

          Loss from discontinued operations. Loss from discontinued operations increased approximately $192,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 (a loss of $217,000 in 2013 versus a loss of $25,000 in 2012). The increase is due to the loss on the sale of a portion of the land and single tenant building at our Woodlake Pointe property of $576,000, partially offset by increased income from the single tenant at our Woodlake Pointe property, which opened for business during the fourth quarter of 2012.

          Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests. Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests increased approximately $607,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 (income of $476,000 in 2013 versus a loss of $131,000 in 2012). This amount represents the 40% interest in the Woodlake Pointe property and the 40% interest in Woodlake Holdco (owns our investment in Woodlake Square) that we do not own, but that we consolidate in our financial statements. The increase in income was recognized from our equity portion of the gain on sale of Woodlake Square property offset by the loss from the sale of a portion of the land and single tenant building at our Woodlake Pointe property.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

          As of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $5.5 million and $129,000, respectively.

          Over the past several years, our results of operations and valuations of our real estate assets have been negatively impacted by overall economic conditions from the recent, severe recession. Most of our retail properties were purchased prior to 2008 when retail real estate market prices were much higher, and our property valuations were negatively impacted by these market dynamics. The United States has experienced recent improvements in the general economy; however, high levels of unemployment have persisted, and rental rates and valuations for retail space have not fully recovered to pre-recession levels and may not for a number of years. As a result, we have faced significant liquidity challenges over the last several years. However, we have been successful in meeting our historic cash shortfalls through (1) managing the timing of forecasted capital expenditures related to the lease-up of properties, (2) managing the timing of operating expense payments and, to the extent possible, accelerating cash collections, (3) deferring the payment of fees owed to our General Partner and its affiliates, (4) selling certain of our properties and investments in non-consolidated entities (see Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and/or (5) obtaining funds through additional borrowings from AmREIT.

          As of September 30, 2013, our liquidity has improved due to the sale of Woodlake Square and the Woodlake Pointe joint venture’s sale of a portion of its Woodlake Pointe property. See also Note 3 related to our property dispositions. During 2013, we have repaid approximately $4.0 million of our notes payable –related party (including a payment made October 1, 2013).

          Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of operating expenses and other expenditures associated with our properties, regular debt service requirements and capital expenditures. We anticipate that our primary long-term liquidity requirements will include, but will not be limited to, operating expenses, making scheduled debt service payments, funding renovations, expansions, and other significant capital expenditures for our existing portfolio of properties.

          We expect to fund approximately $1.5 million in capital expenditures over the next two years at our Casa Linda property (a 50% joint venture between us and MIG III) representing our 50% share of a lease-up strategy at this property. The $38.0 million mortgage on the property matures in January 2014. We have engaged a mortgage broker to assist us with refinancing this loan and have recently selected a lender based upon preliminary terms for a non-recourse loan with an initial funding of $38.0 million and a future funding of approximately $4.5 million for the potential acquisition of an adjacent property. The terms of the proposed loan are a term of four years with a one-year extension, interest at the 3-Month LIBOR plus a spread of 3.50% and interest-only payments for the first two years with monthly payments of interest and principal based upon a 30-year amortization thereafter with the balance due upon maturity. We expect the joint venture to close on the loan during the fourth quarter of 2013.

18

          There is no guarantee that we and our joint ventures will be successful with all of the above liquidity initiatives, and we may continue to look to AmREIT to provide additional financial support to us to meet our operating cash needs. We can provide no assurance that AmREIT will be able to provide additional support, if needed. Historically, AmREIT has deferred payment of advisory fees earned to the extent such deferrals of fees were necessary for our continued operation. Such fees included property management, asset management, development fees, interest expense on amounts owed to AmREIT and reimbursements of certain of AmREIT’s general and administrative costs. Additionally, AmREIT has agreed that it will not require us to repay the remaining balance of our notes payable – related party to it until a date subsequent to January 1, 2014 if such repayment were to prevent the execution of our strategy or present an unnecessary financial hardship to us. AmREIT’s agreement to provide such financial support and defer payment is limited to its continued ability to do so

Current Market Conditions

          Over the past several years, our results of operations and valuations of our real estate assets have been negatively impacted by overall economic conditions. The United States economy has experienced recent improvements in the general economy, but general concerns from the recent, severe recession remain. Concerns include, but are not limited to the potential future increase of future interest as well as the availability and cost of capital as the economy improves. Additionally, there is remaining uncertainty of whether the United States economy will be adversely affected by inflation, deflation or stagflation and the systemic impact of periods of high unemployment, volatile energy costs, geopolitical issues, which have contributed to increased market volatility and weakened business and consumer confidence. High levels of unemployment have persisted, and rental rates and valuations for retail space have not fully recovered to pre-recession levels and may not for a number of years. Our General Partner believes that the retail real estate market is likely to remain depressed for most of 2013; however, it is difficult to determine the breadth and duration of the financial market problems and how such problems may affect our tenants and the valuation of our assets. To navigate these challenging market conditions, we have created a strategic plan to maximize value prior to and during our upcoming liquidation period as further described in the “Overview” section above.

Cash Flow Activities for the nine months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

          Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Operating activities	$	(396	)	$	(384	)
Investing activities		14,481			(4,521	)
Financing activities		(8,719	)		4,616

          Net cash flows used in operating activities has remained comparable during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012 ($396,000 in 2013 versus $384,000 in 2012).

          Net cash flows used in investing activities increased approximately $19.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012 ($14.5 million provided by investing activities in 2013 versus $4.5 million used in investing activities in 2012). The increase is cash provided by investing activities is primarily related to the following:

• Proceeds received from the sale of a portion of the land and a single tenant building at our Woodlake Pointe property of $11.6 million.

• A decrease in real estate improvements of $3.2 million primarily related to construction at our Woodlake Pointe property during 2012.

• An increase in distributions received from our nonconsolidated investments of $3.5 million primarily related to the sale of Woodlake Square.

19

Net cash flows used in financing activities increased approximately $13.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012 ($8.7 million used in financing activities in 2013 versus $4.6 million provided by financing activities in 2012). The increase in use of funds was primarily attributable to:
	•	A reduction in proceeds received from construction draw activity in 2013 versus 2012 on our Woodlake Pointe construction loan of approximately $3.2 million.
	•	Repayment of the Woodlake Pointe construction loan of $6.8 million during 2013 from the proceeds received from the sale of the portion of land and a single tenant building at our Woodlake Pointe property.
	•	Repayment of notes payable – related party of approximately $2.1 million from the distributions received from the sale of Woodlake Square.
	•	Increased distributions to our non-consolidated interests during 2013 of approximately $1.3 million, primarily to Cambridge & Holcombe and to fund Casa Linda lease-up.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

          Not applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

          Under the supervision and with the participation of our General Partner’s CEO and CFO, our General Partner’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2013. Based on that evaluation, our General Partner’s CEO and CFO concluded that, as of September 30, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in causing material information relating to us to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management on a timely basis and to ensure the quality and timeliness of our public disclosures in accordance with SEC disclosure obligations.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

          There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2013, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

          In the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to litigation or claims. Neither we nor our properties are the subject of any material pending legal proceeding, nor are we aware of any legal proceeding that a government authority is contemplating against us.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

          Not applicable.

20

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

          None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

          None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

          Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

          None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

          The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed, furnished, or incorporated by reference (as stated therein) as part of this Quarterly Report.

21

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.
	By:	AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV
		Corporation, its General Partner
Date: November 12, 2013	By:	/s/ H. Kerr Taylor
		H. Kerr Taylor
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date: November 12, 2013	By:	/s/ Chad C. Braun
		Chad C. Braun
		Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

22

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 3.1	Certificate of Limited Partnership of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P., dated October 10, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form 10-12G dated April 29, 2008).
Exhibit 3.2	Agreement of Limited Partnership of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P., dated November 15, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form 10-12G dated April 29, 2008).
Exhibit 3.2.1	Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P., dated December 7, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to the Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form 10-12G dated April 29, 2008).
Exhibit 31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership’s General Partner pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith).
Exhibit 31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership’s General Partner pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith).
Exhibit 32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership’s General Partner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
Exhibit 32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership’s General Partner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
Exhibit 101.INS	XBRL Instance Document*
Exhibit 101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
Exhibit 101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
Exhibit 101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
Exhibit 101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*
Exhibit 101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*

* Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the following materials, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013, (unaudited) and December 31, 2012, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, and 2012 (unaudited), (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Capital for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, (unaudited), (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, and 2012 (unaudited) and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).

23

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, H. Kerr Taylor, certify that:
	1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.;
	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
	4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
		(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
		(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
		(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
		(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
	5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
		(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
		(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 12, 2013	By:	/s/ H. Kerr Taylor
		Name:	H. Kerr Taylor
		Title:	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Chad C. Braun, certify that:
	1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.;
	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
	4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
		(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
		(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
		(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
		(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
	5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
		(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
		(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 12, 2013	By:	/s/ Chad C. Braun
		Name:	Chad C. Braun
		Title:	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. Kerr Taylor, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of the General Partner of the Company, that, to my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	November 12, 2013	By:	/s/ H. Kerr Taylor
		Name:	H. Kerr Taylor
		Title:	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chad C. Braun, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of the General Partner of the Company, that, to my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	November 12, 2013	By:	/s/ Chad C. Braun
		Name:	Chad C. Braun
		Title	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

          Our financial records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when incurred. The consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as the accounts of any wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. Investments in joint ventures and partnerships in which we have the ability to exercise significant influence but do not exercise financial and operating control are accounted for using the equity method (see Note 4). The significant accounting policies of our non-consolidated entities are consistent with those of our subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. As of September 30, 2013, we do not have any interests in variable interest entities. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

          The consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and are unaudited. In our opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements have been included. Such adjustments consisted of normal recurring items. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the SEC rules and regulations and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

          Certain immaterial reclassfications from have been made to our our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 to conform to current period presentation. The items had no impact on previously reported net income (loss), our Consolidated Balance Sheet or Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow. See also Note 3 for a discussion of our presentation of discontinued operations.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

          The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

          We consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

          Rental income from operating leases – We lease space to tenants under agreements with varying terms. Our leases are accounted for as operating leases, and, although certain leases of the properties provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due and/or for changes in the minimum lease payments over the terms of the leases, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the individual leases. Revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, possession or control occurs on the lease commencement date. In cases where significant tenant improvements are made prior to lease commencement, the leased asset is considered to be the finished space, and revenue recognition therefore begins when the improvements are substantially complete. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes, maintenance expenses and insurance is recognized in the period the related expense is recorded. Additionally, certain of our lease agreements contain provisions that grant additional rents based upon tenants’ sales volumes (contingent or percentage rent). Percentage rents are recognized when the tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in their lease agreements. Accrued rents are included in tenant and accounts receivable, net.

Receivables and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

Receivables and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

          Tenant and Accounts Receivable, net - Included in tenant and accounts receivable are base rents, tenant reimbursements and adjustments related to recording rents on a straight-line basis. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued rents and accounts receivable is determined based upon customer credit-worthiness (including expected recovery of our claim with respect to any tenants in bankruptcy), historical bad debt levels, and current economic trends. Bad debt expenses and any related recoveries related to tenant receivables are included in property expense. As of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, our allowance for uncollectible accounts related to our tenant receivables was $11,000 and $32,000, respectively.

          Accounts Receivable - Related Party - Included in accounts receivable - related party are short-term cash advances provided to certain of our affiliated investment entities primarily for their working capital needs. These cash advances are due upon demand.

Development Properties

Development Properties

          Expenditures related to the development of real estate are capitalized as part of construction in progress, which includes carrying charges, primarily interest, real estate taxes and loan acquisition costs, and direct and indirect development costs related to buildings under construction. The capitalization of such costs ceases at the earlier of one year from the date of completion of major construction or when the property, or any completed portion, becomes available for occupancy. We capitalize costs associated with pending acquisitions of raw land as incurred and expense such costs if and when the acquisition of the property becomes no longer probable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we capitalized interest and property taxes in the amount of $192,000 and $172,000, respectively.

Depreciation

Depreciation

          Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of up to 39 years for buildings, up to 11 years for site improvements and over the term of the lease for tenant improvements. We re-evaluate the useful lives of our buildings and improvements as warranted by changing conditions at our properties. As part of this re-evaluation, we may also consider whether such changing conditions indicate a potential impairment, and we perform an impairment analysis, as necessary, at the property level. In the case of a property redevelopment, we reassess the useful lives of specific buildings or other improvements to be demolished as part of that redevelopment once the redevelopment is probable of occurring.

Impairment

Impairment

          We review our properties for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets, including acquired lease intangibles and accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. We determine whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the property, with the carrying value of the individual property. If impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Both the estimated undiscounted cash flow analysis and fair value determination are based upon various factors that require complex and subjective judgments to be made by management. Such assumptions include projecting lease-up periods, holding periods, cap rates, rental rates, operating expenses, lease terms, tenant creditworthiness, tenant improvement allowances, terminal sales value and certain macroeconomic factors among other assumptions to be made for each property. For our multi-building retail centers, we consider the entire retail center as the asset group for purposes of our impairment analysis. We review our investments in non-consolidated entities for impairment based on a similar review of the properties held by the investee entity. No impairment charges were recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

          GAAP emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. GAAP requires the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. Observable inputs are inputs that the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of ours. When market data inputs are unobservable, we utilize inputs that we believe reflect our best estimate of the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs that are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Partnership has the ability to access.

• Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

• Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on the Partnership’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

          Recurring Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments – Our consolidated financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, tenant and accounts receivable, accounts receivable – related party, notes payable, notes payable – related party, accounts payable – related party, and accounts payable and other liabilities. The carrying values of all of the financial instruments, except for our notes payable are representative of the fair values due to the short-term nature of the instruments. See Note 5 for fair value disclosures of our notes payable.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events

          On October 1, 2013, we repaid $1.9 million on the note payable – related party to AmREIT.

          Except as disclosed above, we did not have any additional material subsequent events as of the date of this filing that impacted our consolidated financial statements.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases	$ 265		$ 255	$ 761		$ 817
Total revenues	265		255	761		817
Expenses:
General and administrative	30		27	67		68
General and administrative - related party	75		78	208		213
Asset management fees - related party	38		38	115		115
Property expense	158		139	349		389
Property management fees - related party	12		12	35		34
Legal and professional	42		44	158		198
Depreciation and amortization	147		128	406		387
Total operating expenses	502		466	1,338		1,404
Operating loss	(237)		(211)	(577)		(587)
Other income (expense):
Interest and other income	11			12
Interest expense	(115)		(127)	(344)		(358)
Income (loss) from non-consolidated entities	1,565		(324)	1,250		(876)
Margin tax benefit (expense)	6			6
Total other income (expense)	1,467		(451)	924		(1,234)
Income (loss) before continuing operations	1,230		(662)	347		(1,821)
Loss from discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from real estate operations	170		(8)	359		(25)
Loss on sale of real estate	(576)	[1]		(576)	[1]
Loss from discontinued operations	(406)		(8)	(217)		(25)
Net income (loss), including non-controlling interests	824		(670)	130	[2]	(1,846)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests	(501)		42	(476)		131
Net income (loss) attributable to partners	$ 323		$ (628)	$ (346)		$ (1,715)
Weighted average Units outstanding (in shares)	1,988		1,988	1,988		1,988
Net loss per Unit
Income (loss) before discontinued operations	$ 619		$ (333)	$ 175		$ (916)
Loss from discontinued opertations	$ (204)		$ (4.02)	$ (109)		$ (12.58)
(Income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests	$ (252)		$ 21.13	$ (239)		$ 65.90
Net income (loss) attributable to partners	$ 162		$ (316)	$ (174)		$ (863)

[1] The loss on sale primarily relates to bad debt expense associated with the write-off of accrued rent.

[2] The allocation of net income includes a curative allocation to increase the General Partner's capital account by $3 for the period. The cumulative curative allocation since inception of the Partnership is $276. The Partnership Agreement provides that no Partner shall be required to fund a deficit balance in their capital account.

XML

ASSETS DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Assets Dispositions And Discontinued Operations

ASSETS DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

3. ASSET DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

          On September 30, 2013, our Woodlake Pointe joint venture sold a portion of the Woodlake Pointe property consisting of land and a building for $12.0 million to an unrelated third party. The sale resulted in net proceeds of $4.9 million after payoff of a $6.6 million mortgage and other closing costs. Our 60% portion of the net cash proceeds was $3.0 million. We plan to use the proceeds to fund the Casa Linda lease-up strategy, pay down a portion of our note payable to AmREIT and for working capital needs.

          We have presented the operating results of this property as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. A summary of our discontinued operations for the periods presented is detailed below:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases	$	263		$	—		$	882		$	—
Total revenues		263			—			882			—
Expenses:
Property expense		2			2			190			3
Legal and professional		30			1			56			8
Depreciation and amortization		—			—			94			—
Total operating expenses		32			3			340			11
Operating income (loss)		231			(3	)		542			(11	)
Other expense:
Interest expense		(61	)		(5	)		(183	)		(14	)
Total other expense		(61	)		(5	)		(183	)		(14	)
Income (loss) from real estate operations		170			(8	)		359			(25	)
Loss on sale of real estate(1)		(576	)		—			(576	)		—
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(406	)	$	(8	)	$	(217	)	$	(25	)

(1) The loss on sale primarily relates to bad debt expense associated with the write-off of accrued rent.

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details Narrative) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended				0 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Oct. 01, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Oct. 01, 2013 AmReit	Sep. 30, 2013 Building	Sep. 30, 2013 Site improvements
Allowance for uncollectible accounts - Tenant receivables	$ 11			$ 32
Capitalized interest and taxes	192		172
Estimated useful life						39 years	11 years
Impairment charges	0		0
Payments on notes payable - related party	$ (2,050)	$ 4,000			$ 1,900

XML

ASSETS DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Assets Dispositions And Discontinued Operations Tables

Schedule of discontinued operations

A summary of our discontinued operations for the periods presented is detailed below:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases	$	263		$	—		$	882		$	—
Total revenues		263			—			882			—
Expenses:
Property expense		2			2			190			3
Legal and professional		30			1			56			8
Depreciation and amortization		—			—			94			—
Total operating expenses		32			3			340			11
Operating income (loss)		231			(3	)		542			(11	)
Other expense:
Interest expense		(61	)		(5	)		(183	)		(14	)
Total other expense		(61	)		(5	)		(183	)		(14	)
Income (loss) from real estate operations		170			(8	)		359			(25	)
Loss on sale of real estate(1)		(576	)		—			(576	)		—
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(406	)	$	(8	)	$	(217	)	$	(25	)

(1) The loss on sale primarily relates to bad debt expense associated with the write-off of accrued rent.

XML

INVESTMENT IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Investment in non-consolidated entities	$ 7,166	$ 9,222
Casa Linda Lp
Investment in non-consolidated entities	2,329	2,707
Investment in non-consolidated entities (in percent)	50.00%
Cambridge & Holcombe Lp
Investment in non-consolidated entities	838	675
Investment in non-consolidated entities (in percent)	50.00%
Shadow Creek Ranch LLC
Investment in non-consolidated entities	3,999	4,214
Investment in non-consolidated entities (in percent)	10.00%
Woodlake Lp
Investment in non-consolidated entities		$ 1,626
Investment in non-consolidated entities (in percent)		6.00%

XML

INVESTMENT IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES (Details Narrative) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		9 Months Ended			0 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013 Casa Linda Lp sqft	Sep. 30, 2013 Casa Linda - MIG III	Sep. 30, 2013 Cambridge & Holcombe Lp acre	Sep. 30, 2013 Cambridge & Holcombe Lp - Unaffiliated Third Party	Sep. 30, 2013 Shadow Creek Ranch LLC sqft	Sep. 30, 2013 Shadow Creek Ranch LLC - AmREIT	Sep. 30, 2013 Shadow Creek Ranch LLC - Unaffiliated third party	Sep. 18, 2013 Woodlake Lp	Dec. 31, 2012 Woodlake Lp sqft	Dec. 31, 2012 Woodlake Lp - Third-party institutional partner	Dec. 31, 2012 Woodlake Lp - ARIC	Dec. 31, 2012 Woodlake Lp - MIG III
Investment in non-consolidated entities (in percent)	50.00%		50.00%		10.00%				6.00%
Area of gross leasable real estate area	325,000				613,000				161,000
Area of raw land owned			2.02
Investment in non-consolidated entities, noncontrolling owners (in percent)		50.00%		50.00%	90.00%	10.00%	80.00%		94.00%	90.00%	1.00%	3.00%
Property mortgage loan amount	$ 38,000				$ 65,000
Term of mortgage loan	7 years
Property mortgage loan, maturity date	Jan. 31, 2014		Mar. 31, 2015		Mar. 31, 2015
Mortgage loan interest rate (in percent)	5.48%				5.48%
Property mortgage loan, extension period	1 year
Future capital expenditures	1,500
Mortgage loan matured unpaid			8,100
Mortgage loan renewed description			In exchange for a 10% principal reduction on the note and payment of accrued interest, which has expired
Principal reduction of loan (in percent)			10.00%
Payments for principal reduction of loan			536
Guarantee on loan (in percent)			60.00%
Non-refundable escrow deposits			325
Proceeds from sale of property, proportion share								$ 2,000

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details Narrative) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Property management and leasing fees, paid by non-consolidated entities	$ 653	$ 979

XML

CONCENTRATIONS (Details Narrative)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Rental income
Concentration risk	100.00%
Consolidated Properties 1 | Total assets
Concentration risk	10.00%
Consolidated Properties 2 | Total assets
Concentration risk	10.00%

XML

ASSETS DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases	$ 263			$ 882
Total revenues	263			882
Expenses:
Property expense	2		2	190		3
Legal and professional	30		1	56		8
Depreciation and amortization				94
Total operating expenses	32		3	340		11
Operating income	231		(3)	542		(11)
Other expense:
Interest expense	(61)		(5)	(183)		(14)
Total other expense	(61)		(5)	(183)		(14)
Income (loss) from real estate operations	170		(8)	359		(25)
Loss on sale of real estate	(576)	[1]		(576)	[1]
Loss from discontinued operations	$ (406)		$ (8)	$ (217)		$ (25)

[1] The loss on sale primarily relates to bad debt expense associated with the write-off of accrued rent.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CAPITAL (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Curative allocations adjustment	$ 3
Cumulative curative allocation adjustment	$ 276

XML

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Description Of Business And Nature Of Operations

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

General

          We are a Delaware limited partnership formed on October 10, 2006, to acquire, develop and operate, directly or indirectly through joint venture arrangements, a portfolio of commercial real estate consisting primarily of multi-tenant shopping centers and mixed-use developments. Our General Partner is a subsidiary of AmREIT, an SEC reporting, Maryland corporation that is publicly traded on the NYSE and that has elected to be taxed as a REIT. As of September 30, 2013, our investments included a wholly-owned property comprised of approximately 36,306 square feet of GLA, a property in which we own a controlling interest comprised of approximately 82,120 square feet of GLA and three properties in which we own a non-controlling interest through joint ventures comprised of approximately 938,000 square feet of GLA.

          Our operating period will continue until November 15, 2013 (our scheduled liquidation commencement date); however, the operating period may be extended to November 15, 2015 with the consent of holders of the majority of Units held by our Limited Partners. Once the liquidation period commences, we will not invest in any new real estate without approval of our limited partners. An orderly liquidation of all of our properties and wind-down of our operations will likely take years for our General Partner to complete. Because liquidation was not imminent as of September 30, 2013, the financial statements are presented assuming we continue as a going concern.

Economic Conditions and Liquidity

          Over the past several years, our results of operations and valuations of our real estate assets have been negatively impacted by overall economic conditions from the recent, severe recession. Most of our retail properties were purchased prior to 2008 when retail real estate market prices were much higher, and our property valuations were negatively impacted by these market dynamics. The United States has experienced recent improvements in the general economy; however, high levels of unemployment have persisted, and rental rates and valuations for retail space have not fully recovered to pre-recession levels and may not for a number of years. As a result, we have faced significant liquidity challenges over the last several years. However, we have been successful in meeting our historic cash shortfalls through (1) managing the timing of forecasted capital expenditures related to the lease-up of properties, (2) managing the timing of operating expense payments and, to the extent possible, accelerating cash collections, (3) deferring the payment of fees owed to our General Partner and its affiliates, (4) selling certain of our properties and investments in non-consolidated entities (see Notes 3 and 4) and/or (5) obtaining funds through additional borrowings from AmREIT.

          As of September 30, 2013, we have $5.5 million in cash on hand and our liquidity has improved due to the sale of Woodlake Square and our Woodlake Pointe joint venture’s sale of a portion of its Woodlake Pointe property. During 2013, we have repaid approximately $4.0 million of our notes payable –related party (including a payment made October 1, 2013).

          We expect to fund approximately $1.5 million in capital expenditures over the next two years at our Casa Linda property (a 50% joint venture between us and MIG III) representing our 50% share of a lease-up strategy at this property. The $38.0 million mortgage on the property matures in January 2014.We have engaged a mortgage broker to assist us with refinancing this loan and have recently selected a lender based upon preliminary terms for a non-recourse loan with an initial funding of $38.0 million and a future funding of approximately $4.5 million for the potential acquisition of an adjacent property. The proposed terms of the loan are a term of four years with a one-year extension, interest at the 3-Month LIBOR plus a spread of 3.50% and interest-only payments for the first two years with monthly payments of interest and principal based upon a 30-year amortization thereafter, with the balance due upon maturity. We expect the joint venture to close on the loan during the fourth quarter of 2013.

          On September 30, 2013, our Woodlake Pointe joint venture sold a portion of the land and a single tenant building at our Woodlake Pointe property for $12.0 million to an unrelated third party. The sale resulted in net proceeds of $4.9 million after payoff of a $6.6 million mortgage and other closing costs. Our portion of the net cash proceeds, which was 60%, was $3.0 million. We plan to use the proceeds to fund the Casa Linda lease-up strategy, pay down a portion of our note payable to AmREIT and for working capital needs. We recorded a loss on sale of $576,000 primarily related to bad debt expense associated with the write-off of accrued rent.

          On September 18, 2013, VIF II/AmREIT Woodlake, LP (“Woodlake LP”), sold Woodlake Square, a grocery-anchored, multi-tenant retail shopping center, to AmREIT for $41.6 million. We received approximately $2.0 million representing our proportional share, which is 6% of the net proceeds once the final distribution is made.

          There is no guarantee that we and our joint ventures will be successful with the above liquidity initiatives, and we may continue to look to AmREIT to provide additional financial support to us to meet our operating cash needs. We can provide no assurance that AmREIT will be able to provide additional support, if needed. Historically, AmREIT has deferred payment of advisory fees earned to the extent such deferrals of fees were necessary for our continued operation. Such fees included property management, asset management, development fees, interest expense on amounts owed to AmREIT and reimbursements of certain of AmREIT’s general and administrative costs. Additionally, AmREIT has agreed that it will not require us to repay the remaining balance of our notes payable – related party to it until a date subsequent to January 1, 2014 if such repayment were to prevent the execution of our strategy or present an unnecessary financial hardship to us. AmREIT’s agreement to provide such financial support and defer payment is limited to its continued ability to do so.

Strategic Plan

          We have created a strategic plan to maximize value prior to and during our upcoming liquidation period. The components of our strategic plan are as follows:

• Complete our development and redevelopment projects with a goal to stabilize these projects over the next 6-12 months. We believe that completing our development and redevelopment projects including their lease-up and stabilization will allow us to maximize the return on these properties upon sale. Our investment in Cambridge & Holcombe represents our only investment property currently under development/redevelopment. See Note 4 for further discussion of the redevelopment plans at this property.

• Continue to operate our projects in a first-class manner with a goal to generate operating cash flow in order to re-commence distributions. We believe that the stabilization of our development and redevelopment properties, coupled with the continued and intense oversight of our operating properties, will generate liquidity that could allow us to re-commence distributions to our Limited Partners; however, we expect this will most likely occur during the liquidation phase. Once we begin our liquidation period, an orderly liquidation of our assets and wind-down of our operations will likely take several years for our General Partner to complete.

• Sell our properties opportunistically as the market continues to recover. Our recent sales by our joint venture of Woodlake Square and the portion of land and single tenant building at Woodlake Pointe are recent examples of our execution of this strategy. However, once a property is marketed for sale, it may take several months to receive offers and complete due diligence by both parties. Our General Partner will in good faith begin to review market sales opportunities for our operating properties at the conclusion of our operating period, but retail property valuations may continue to be challenged, and, accordingly, attractive sales opportunities may not exist in the near term. When deciding whether or when to sell properties, our General Partner will consider factors such as potential appreciation of value, and timing of cash flows. During the liquidation period, we will be distributing net proceeds generated from property sales to our Limited Partners unless the General Partner has identified attractive acquisition opportunities and obtained a majority vote of the Limited Partners to re-invest such proceeds.

          Although we believe that our strategic plan maximizes the value of our properties and is in the best interest of our Limited Partners, no assurances can be given that this strategy will be successful, and it is possible that investors may not recover all of their original investment.

          The above steps may not be sufficient, and we could incur individual setbacks and possibly significant losses. Additional deterioration in the United States economy or the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more of our significant tenants could cause our current plans to meet our projected cash shortfalls to be insufficient. Even with the above strategic plan and liquidity initiatives, we still may incur cash shortfalls if we are required to perform under certain guarantees (see Note 5) of our joint ventures or are unable to refinance certain debt as it comes due, which could result in lender repossession of one or more properties owned by us and/or our joint ventures or be forced to sell one or more properties at a time when it is disadvantageous to do so, potentially resulting in losses on the disposition of those properties.

XML

INVESTMENT IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Investment In Non-Consolidated Entities

INVESTMENT IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

4. INVESTMENT IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

          As of September 30, 2013, we have investments in three entities that are accounted for using the equity method of accounting due to our ability to exercise significant influence over them. Our investment balances as reported on our consolidated balance sheet are as follows (in thousands):

Investment	Ownership		September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Casa Linda	50	%	$	2,329	$	2,707
Cambridge & Holcombe	50	%		838		675
Shadow Creek Ranch	10	%		3,999		4,214
Woodlake Square	6	%		—		1,626
Total			$	7,166	$	9,222

          Casa Linda - We own a 50% interest in AmREIT Casa Linda, LP, which owns Casa Linda Plaza, a multi-tenant retail property located in Dallas, Texas with a combined GLA of approximately 325,000 square feet. The remaining 50% is owned by MIG III. The property is secured by a $38.0 million, seven-year mortgage loan that matures January 2014. The loan bears an annual interest rate of 5.48% and is interest-only until maturity. We have engaged a mortgage broker to assist us with refinancing this loan and have recently selected a lender based upon preliminary terms for a non-recourse loan with an initial funding of $38.0 million and a future funding of approximately $4.5 million for the potential acquisition of an adjacent property. The proposed terms of the loan are a term of four years with a one-year extension, interest at the 3-Month LIBOR plus a spread of 3.50% and interest-only payments for the first two years with monthly payments of interest and principal based upon a 30-year amortization thereafter, with the balance due upon maturity. We expect the joint venture to close on the loan during the fourth quarter of 2013. We expect to fund approximately $1.5 million in capital expenditures over the next two years at our Casa Linda property (a 50% joint venture between us and MIG III) representing our 50% share of a lease-up strategy at this property.

          Cambridge & Holcombe - We own a 50% interest in Cambridge & Holcombe, LP, which owns 2.02 acres of raw land that may be developed, sold or contributed to a joint venture in the future. The property is located adjacent to the Texas Medical Center in Houston, Texas. The remaining 50% is owned by an unaffiliated third party. In June 2011, the $8.1 million loan matured unpaid. On April 26, 2012, we successfully extended this debt until March 27, 2013 in exchange for a 10% principal reduction on the note and payment of accrued interest, which expired. Our 50% portion of this payment was $536,000, which was funded through a loan from AmREIT. We closed on a second extension of the loan on May 17, 2013. The extended loan matures in March 2015. In connection with this extension, we and our joint venture partner entered into a joint and several guaranty of up to 60% of the loan balance. The joint venture entered into a contract to sell one acre of the property to a third party, subject to a due diligence period that expired in December 2012. The third party elected not to purchase the land, and the contract expired. Approximately $325,000 in escrow deposits was forfeited by the third party, which we used to fund debt service on the loan for the past several months. We are currently marketing the property for sale and have received offers for the purchase of all or a portion of the property.

          Shadow Creek Ranch - We own a 10% interest in Shadow Creek Holding Company LLC, which owns Shadow Creek Ranch, a multi-tenant retail property located in Pearland, Texas with a combined GLA of approximately 613,000 square feet. The remaining 90% is owned by an unaffiliated third party (80%) and AmREIT (10%). The property is secured by a loan in the amount of $65.0 million at an annual interest rate of 5.48% until its maturity in March 2015.

          Woodlake Square – As of December 31, 2012, we owned a 6% interest in Woodlake LP, which owned Woodlake Square, a grocery-anchored, multi-tenant retail property located at the corner of Westheimer and Gessner in Houston, Texas with a combined GLA of approximately 161,000 square feet. The remaining 94% was owned by the third-party institutional partner (90%), ARIC (1%) and by MIG III (3%). On September 18, 2013, Woodlake LP sold Woodlake Square to AmREIT for $41.6 million based on arms-length negotiations between AmREIT and our third party institutional partner that owned a 90% interest in the property. The joint venture recorded a gain on sale of $10.4 million. Our share of this gain is included in our income (loss) from non-consolidated entities. We received approximately $2.0 million representing our proportional share of the net proceeds.

          Combined condensed financial information for the underlying investee entities (at 100%) is summarized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenue	$	4,545		$	4,247		$	14,251		$	12,841
Gain on sale of real estate		10,532			—			10,532			528
Depreciation and amortization		(1,661	)		(1,738	)		(5,088	)		(5,297	)
Interese expense		(1,588	)		(1,657	)		(4,862	)		(5,012	)
Net income (loss)		10,177			(930	)		9,415			(2,084	)

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

          Our financial records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when incurred. The consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as the accounts of any wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. Investments in joint ventures and partnerships in which we have the ability to exercise significant influence but do not exercise financial and operating control are accounted for using the equity method (see Note 4). The significant accounting policies of our non-consolidated entities are consistent with those of our subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. As of September 30, 2013, we do not have any interests in variable interest entities. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

          The consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and are unaudited. In our opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements have been included. Such adjustments consisted of normal recurring items. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the SEC rules and regulations and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Reclassifications

          Certain immaterial reclassfications from have been made to our our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 to conform to current period presentation. The items had no impact on previously reported net income (loss), our Consolidated Balance Sheet or Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow. See also Note 3 for a discussion of our presentation of discontinued operations.

Use of Estimates

          The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

          We consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds.

Revenue Recognition

          Rental income from operating leases – We lease space to tenants under agreements with varying terms. Our leases are accounted for as operating leases, and, although certain leases of the properties provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due and/or for changes in the minimum lease payments over the terms of the leases, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the individual leases. Revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, possession or control occurs on the lease commencement date. In cases where significant tenant improvements are made prior to lease commencement, the leased asset is considered to be the finished space, and revenue recognition therefore begins when the improvements are substantially complete. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes, maintenance expenses and insurance is recognized in the period the related expense is recorded. Additionally, certain of our lease agreements contain provisions that grant additional rents based upon tenants’ sales volumes (contingent or percentage rent). Percentage rents are recognized when the tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in their lease agreements. Accrued rents are included in tenant and accounts receivable, net.

Receivables and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

          Tenant and Accounts Receivable, net - Included in tenant and accounts receivable are base rents, tenant reimbursements and adjustments related to recording rents on a straight-line basis. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued rents and accounts receivable is determined based upon customer credit-worthiness (including expected recovery of our claim with respect to any tenants in bankruptcy), historical bad debt levels, and current economic trends. Bad debt expenses and any related recoveries related to tenant receivables are included in property expense. As of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, our allowance for uncollectible accounts related to our tenant receivables was $11,000 and $32,000, respectively.

          Accounts Receivable - Related Party - Included in accounts receivable - related party are short-term cash advances provided to certain of our affiliated investment entities primarily for their working capital needs. These cash advances are due upon demand.

Development Properties

          Expenditures related to the development of real estate are capitalized as part of construction in progress, which includes carrying charges, primarily interest, real estate taxes and loan acquisition costs, and direct and indirect development costs related to buildings under construction. The capitalization of such costs ceases at the earlier of one year from the date of completion of major construction or when the property, or any completed portion, becomes available for occupancy. We capitalize costs associated with pending acquisitions of raw land as incurred and expense such costs if and when the acquisition of the property becomes no longer probable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we capitalized interest and property taxes in the amount of $192,000 and $172,000, respectively.

Depreciation

          Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of up to 39 years for buildings, up to 11 years for site improvements and over the term of the lease for tenant improvements. We re-evaluate the useful lives of our buildings and improvements as warranted by changing conditions at our properties. As part of this re-evaluation, we may also consider whether such changing conditions indicate a potential impairment, and we perform an impairment analysis, as necessary, at the property level. In the case of a property redevelopment, we reassess the useful lives of specific buildings or other improvements to be demolished as part of that redevelopment once the redevelopment is probable of occurring.

Impairment

          We review our properties for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets, including acquired lease intangibles and accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. We determine whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the property, with the carrying value of the individual property. If impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Both the estimated undiscounted cash flow analysis and fair value determination are based upon various factors that require complex and subjective judgments to be made by management. Such assumptions include projecting lease-up periods, holding periods, cap rates, rental rates, operating expenses, lease terms, tenant creditworthiness, tenant improvement allowances, terminal sales value and certain macroeconomic factors among other assumptions to be made for each property. For our multi-building retail centers, we consider the entire retail center as the asset group for purposes of our impairment analysis. We review our investments in non-consolidated entities for impairment based on a similar review of the properties held by the investee entity. No impairment charges were recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value Measurements

          GAAP emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. GAAP requires the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. Observable inputs are inputs that the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of ours. When market data inputs are unobservable, we utilize inputs that we believe reflect our best estimate of the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs that are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Partnership has the ability to access.

• Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

• Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on the Partnership’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

          Recurring Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments – Our consolidated financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, tenant and accounts receivable, accounts receivable – related party, notes payable, notes payable – related party, accounts payable – related party, and accounts payable and other liabilities. The carrying values of all of the financial instruments, except for our notes payable are representative of the fair values due to the short-term nature of the instruments. See Note 5 for fair value disclosures of our notes payable.

Subsequent Events

          On October 1, 2013, we repaid $1.9 million on the note payable – related party to AmREIT.

          Except as disclosed above, we did not have any additional material subsequent events as of the date of this filing that impacted our consolidated financial statements.

XML

INVESTMENT IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES (Details 1) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Depreciation and amortization	$ 147	$ 128	$ 406	$ 387
Interest expense	115	127	344	358
Net income (loss)	323	(628)	(346)	(1,715)
Equity method investments, Investee entities
Revenue	4,545	4,247	14,251	12,313
Gain on sale of real estate	10,532		10,532
Depreciation and amortization	(1,661)	(1,738)	(5,088)	(5,297)
Interest expense	(1,588)	(1,657)	(4,862)	(5,012)
Net income (loss)	$ 10,177	$ (930)	$ 9,415	$ (2,084)

XML

CONCENTRATIONS (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012
Base rent income	$ 325		$ 90	$ 995		$ 271
LA Fitness
Base rent income	241	[1]		720	[1]
Paesano's
Base rent income	39		49	148		148
Alamo Heights Pediatrics
Base rent income	18		18	53		53
Rouse Dental
Base rent income	20		14	48		42
Cafe Salsita
Base rent income	$ 7		$ 9	$ 26		$ 28

[1] LA Fitness occupied the newly constructed building at our Woodlake Pointe property, which was sold on September 30, 2013. See Note 3. We will receive no further rent from this tenant in future reporting periods.

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (Parenthetical)	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Limited partners, units outstanding (in shares)	1,988	1,988

XML

PARTNERS' CAPITAL AND NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Partners' Capital Notes [Abstract]

PARTNERS' CAPITAL AND NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

7. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

          Distributions –We suspended all distribution payments in July 2009 and do not anticipate reinstating distributions until we have stabilized our properties and we generate liquidity that could allow us to re-commence distributions. See Note 1. All distributions to date have been a return of capital. During our liquidation stage (anticipated to commence in November 2013, unless extended), net cash flows, will be distributed among the Limited Partners and the General Partner in the following manner:

• First - 100% to the Limited Partners (in proportion to their unreturned actual invested capital) until such time as the limited partners have received cumulative distributions from all sources equal to 100% of their actual invested capital (calculated using the actual purchase price per Unit);

• Second - 100% to the General Partner until it has received cumulative distributions from all sources equal to 100% of its actual invested capital of $1,000;

• Third - 1% to the General Partner and 99% to the Limited Partners on a per Unit basis until such time as the Limited Partners have received cumulative distributions from all sources equal to 8.5% per annum, cumulative, uncompounded return on their unreturned deemed capital contributions (which will be equal to (i) the product of $25,000 per Unit (regardless of the purchase price paid for a Unit) multiplied by the number of Units owned by a partner, reduced by (ii) the aggregate amount of any distributions received that constitute a return of capital contributions);

• Fourth – 100% to the General Partner until it has received cumulative distributions from all sources (other than with respect to the Units it purchased) in an amount equal to 40% of the net cash flow paid to date to the Limited Partners in excess of their actual invested capital; and

• Thereafter - 60% to the Limited Partners on a per Unit basis and 40% to the General Partner.

          Non-controlling Interests – Non-controlling interests includes a 40% ownership interest that our affiliates have in our Woodlake Pointe property and a 40% interest that our affiliates have in our investment in Woodlake HoldCo that we consolidate as a result of our 60% controlling financial interest.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CAPITAL (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2013 General Partner	Dec. 31, 2012 General Partner	Sep. 30, 2013 Limited Partner		Sep. 30, 2013 Non-Controlling Interest
Balance, beginning	$ 23,127				$ 16,333		$ 6,794
Net income (loss) attributable to partners	130	[1]			(346)	[1]	476	[1]
Contributions from non-controlling interests	146						146
Distributions to non-controlling interests	(1,355)						(1,355)
Balance, ending	$ 22,048				$ 15,987		$ 6,061

[1] The allocation of net income includes a curative allocation to increase the General Partner's capital account by $3 for the period. The cumulative curative allocation since inception of the Partnership is $276. The Partnership Agreement provides that no Partner shall be required to fund a deficit balance in their capital account.

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Real estate investments at cost:
Land	$ 7,561	$ 12,613
Buildings	12,924	14,483
Tenant improvements	345	4,678
Real estate investments, gross	20,830	31,774
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(2,694)	(2,408)
Real estate investments, net	18,136	29,366
Investment in non-consolidated entities	7,166	9,222
Acquired lease intangibles, net	24	35
Net real estate investments	25,326	38,623
Cash and cash equivalents	5,495	129
Tenant and accounts receivables, net	93	295
Accounts receivable - related party	304	75
Notes receivable, net	8
Deferred costs, net	53	576
Other assets	291	138
TOTAL ASSETS	31,570	39,836
Liabilities:
Notes payable	5,820	12,140
Notes payable - related party	2,907	3,658
Accounts payable and other liabilities	447	459
Accounts payable - related party	301	405
Acquired below-market lease intangibles, net	4	6
Security deposits	43	41
TOTAL LIABILITIES	9,522	16,709
Partners' capital:
General partner
Limited partners, 1,988 Units outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	16,420	16,333
TOTAL PARTNERS' CAPITAL	16,420	16,333
Non-controlling interests	5,628	6,794
TOTAL CAPITAL	22,048	23,127
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL	$ 31,570	$ 39,836

XML

NOTES PAYABLE (Details Narrative) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Guarantor of debt amount	$ 24,200
Debt guarantor matures	In 2014 and 2015
Notes payable - related party	2,907	3,658
Fair value of fixed-rate notes payable	$ 6,200	$ 6,300
Notes payable - Village on the Green
Fixed-rate debt mortgage loan (in percent)	5.50%
Property mortgage loan, maturity date	Apr. 30, 2017

XML

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (Details Narrative) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended					9 Months Ended		0 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Oct. 01, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013 Woodlake Pointe - Sale	Sep. 30, 2013 Non-controlling interest N sqft	Sep. 30, 2013 Casa Linda Lp sqft	Sep. 30, 2013 Amreit Casa Linda Lp Refinancing Loan	Sep. 18, 2013 Woodlake Lp	Dec. 31, 2012 Woodlake Lp sqft	Sep. 30, 2013 Wholly owned property N sqft	Sep. 30, 2013 Controlling interest sqft N
Number of properties					3					2	1
Area of gross leasable real estate area					938,000	325,000			161,000	36,306	82,120
Future capital expenditures						$ 1,500
Future capital expenditures, period						2 years
Percentage of ownership interest in joint venture (in percent)						50.00%			6.00%
Property mortgage loan amount						38,000
Property mortgage loan, maturity date						Jan. 31, 2014
Property mortgage loan, extension period						1 year
Sale of real estate partnership investment				12,000				41,600
Percentage of proceeds from real estate				60.00%				6.00%
Proceeds from sale of real estate, net				4,900
Proceeds from sale of property, proportion share				2,700				2,000
Repayment of mortgage				6,600				3,400
Interest rate description of the loan							3-Month Libor plus spread of 3.50%
Basis spread on loan							3.50%
Term of the loan							4 years
Amortization period of the principal balance of the loan							30 years
Period of interest only payments							2 years
Non-recourse loan amount of refinancing							38,000
Future funding amount for property purchase							4,500
Payments on notes payable - related party	$ (2,050)	$ 4,000

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Asset management fees	$ 38	$ 38	$ 115	$ 115
Property management fees	12	12	35	34
Affiliated Entities
Asset management fees	38	38	115	115
Property management fees	12	12	35	34
Leasing costs		2	8	98
Development costs		86		258
Interest expense - related party	64	44	96	106
Administrative costs reimbursements	75	78	208	213
Total	$ 189	$ 260	$ 462	$ 824

XML

CONCENTRATIONS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Risks and Uncertainties [Abstract]

CONCENTRATIONS

6. CONCENTRATIONS

          As of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, each of our two consolidated properties individually comprised greater than 10% of our consolidated total assets. Consistent with our strategy of investing in areas that we know well, both properties are located in Texas metropolitan areas. These Texas properties represent 100% of our rental income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The following table details the base rents generated by our top tenants during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
Tenant	2013		2012		2013		2012
LA Fitness (1)	$	241	$	—	$	720	$	—
Paesano’s		39		49		148		148
Alamo Heights Pediatrics		18		18		53		53
Rouse Dental		20		14		48		42
Café Salsita		7		9		26		28
Total	$	325	$	90	$	995	$	271

(1) LA Fitness occupied the newly constructed building at our Woodlake Pointe property, which was sold on September 30, 2013. See Note 3. We will receive no further rent from this tenant in future reporting periods.

XML

NOTES PAYABLE (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Notes payable	$ 5,820	$ 12,140
Notes payable - Village on the Green
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Notes payable	5,820	5,891
Notes payable - Woodlake Pointe
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Notes payable		$ 6,249

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

          Litigation - In the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to litigation or claims. There are no material pending legal proceedings against us.

          Environmental matters - In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, we may be potentially liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. We are not aware of any pending environmental proceedings with respect to our properties that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

XML

NOTES PAYABLE

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

NOTES PAYABLE

5. NOTES PAYABLE

          Our outstanding debt as of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, was as follows (in thousands).

Notes payable	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Village on the Green	$	5,820	$	5,891
Woodlake Pointe		—		6,249
Total	$	5,820	$	12,140

          The Village on the Green note payable is a fixed rate mortgage loan that bears interest at 5.5% and matures in April 2017. It may be prepaid, but is subject to a yield-maintenance premium or prepayment penalty. Our Woodlake Pointe construction loan was paid in full upon the sale of the property on September 30, 2013. See Note 3. As of September 30, 2013, we serve as the guarantor of debt in the amount of $24.2 million that is the primary obligation of our non-consolidated joint ventures. The debt for which we serve as guarantor matures in 2014 and 2015. We have not accrued any liability with respect to these guarantees as we believe it is unlikely we would be required to perform and, therefore, the fair value of any obligation would be insignificant.

          Notes Payable – Related Party – As of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the balance of our notes payable – related party was $2.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively. The note accrues interest monthly at 2.78% and is secured by our investment interest in the Woodlake Pointe property. On October 1, 2013, we made a payment of $1.9 million.

          Fair Value of Notes Payable – We record our debt instruments based on contractual terms, net of any applicable premium or discount on our consolidated balance sheet. We did not elect to apply the alternative GAAP provisions of the fair value option for recording financial assets and financial liabilities. The fair value of our variable-rate notes payable approximate their carrying value. In determining the fair value of our fixed-rate debt instruments, we determine the appropriate treasury note rate based on the remaining time to maturity for each of the debt instruments. We then add the appropriate yield spread to the treasury note rate. The yield spread is a risk premium estimated by investors to account for credit risk involved in debt financing. The spread is typically estimated based on the property type and loan-to-value ratio of the debt instrument. The result is an estimate of the market interest rate a typical investor would expect to receive given the underlying subject asset (property type) and remaining time to maturity. The fair value of our fixed-rate notes payable is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Based on these estimates, the fair value of fixed-rate notes payable was approximately $6.3 million as of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss), including non-controlling interests	$ 130	[1]	$ (1,846)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Loss on sale of property	576	[2]
Bad debt expense	16		30
Loss (income) from non-consolidated entities	(1,250)		876
Depreciation and amortization	508		400
Decrease (increase) in tenant and accounts receivable	(342)		92
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable - related party	(92)		(85)
(Increase) decrease in other assets	(153)		(123)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities	38		(309)
Increase in accounts payable - related party	171		583
Increase (decrease) in security deposits	2		(2)
Net cash used in operating activities	(396)		(384)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Improvements to real estate	(558)		(3,785)
Payments received on notes receivable	14
Investment in non-consolidated entities	(240)		(938)
Distributions from non-consolidated entities	3,573		94
Net proceeds from sale of interest in an investment property	11,584
Net proceeds applied to land basis	108		108
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	14,481		(4,521)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable	460		3,694
Payments on notes payable	(6,780)		(67)
Proceeds from notes payable - related party	860		892
Payments on notes payable - related party	(2,050)
Contributions from non-controlling interests	146		97
Distributions to non-controlling interests	(1,355)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(8,719)		4,616
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	5,366		(289)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	129		422
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	5,495		133
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	270		251
Taxes	6		6
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Capitalization of accrued property taxes into the basis of our land at Woodlake Pointe	192		172
Reclassification from accounts payable - related party to notes payable related party	439		580
Reclassification from accounts receivable to notes receivable	137
Construction fees included in accounts payable	$ 27		$ 95

[1] The allocation of net income includes a curative allocation to increase the General Partner's capital account by $3 for the period. The cumulative curative allocation since inception of the Partnership is $276. The Partnership Agreement provides that no Partner shall be required to fund a deficit balance in their capital account.

[2] The loss on sale primarily relates to bad debt expense associated with the write-off of accrued rent.

XML

PARTNERS' CAPITAL AND NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST (Details Narrative) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Percentage of non-controlling interest	40.00%
Percentage of consolidated controlling financial interest	60.00%
Percentage of financial interest our affiliates have in our investment in Woodlake HoldCo	40.00%
First Condition
Percentage of cumulative distribution to the limited partners	100.00%
Percentage of distributions equal to partner's unreturned invested capital	100.00%
Second Condition
Percentage of distributions equal to partner's unreturned invested capital	100.00%
Percentage of cumulative distributions to the General Partner	100.00%
Actual invested capital	$ 1,000
Third Condition
Percentage of cumulative distribution to the limited partners	99.00%
Percentage of distributions equal to partner's unreturned invested capital	8.50%
Percentage of cumulative distributions to the General Partner	1.00%
Product price, per unit	25,000
Fourth Condition
Percentage of distributions equal to partner's unreturned invested capital	40.00%
Percentage of cumulative distributions to the General Partner	100.00%
Thereafter
Percentage of cumulative distribution to the limited partners	60.00%
Percentage of cumulative distributions to the General Partner	40.00%

XML

INVESTMENT IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Investment In Non-Consolidated Entities Tables

Schedule of investment balances

Our investment balances as reported on our consolidated balance sheet are as follows (in thousands):

Investment	Ownership		September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Casa Linda	50	%	$	2,329	$	2,707
Cambridge & Holcombe	50	%		838		675
Shadow Creek Ranch	10	%		3,999		4,214
Woodlake Square	6	%		—		1,626
Total			$	7,166	$	9,222

Schedule of combined condensed financial information for inderlying investee entities

          Combined condensed financial information for the underlying investee entities (at 100%) is summarized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenue	$	4,545		$	4,247		$	14,251		$	12,841
Gain on sale of real estate		10,532			—			10,532			528
Depreciation and amortization		(1,661	)		(1,738	)		(5,088	)		(5,297	)
Interese expense		(1,588	)		(1,657	)		(4,862	)		(5,012	)
Net income (loss)		10,177			(930	)		9,415			(2,084	)

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

          Certain of our affiliates receive fees for ongoing property management and administrative services. In the event that these companies are unable to provide us with the respective services, we would be required to find alternative providers of these services. The following table summarizes the amount of such compensation incurred by us during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
Type of service	2013		2012		2013		2012
Asset management fees	$	38	$	38	$	115	$	115
Property management fees		12		12		35		34
Leasing costs		—		2		8		98
Development costs		—		86		—		258
Interest expense-related party		64		44		96		106
Administrative cost reimbursements		75		78		208		213
	$	189	$	260	$	462	$	824

          In addition to the above fees incurred by us, the non-consolidated entities in which we have investments paid $653,000 and $979,000 in property management and leasing fees to one of our affiliated entities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See also Note 4 regarding investments in non-consolidated entities.

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Schedule of compensation paid to affiliates

The following table summarizes the amount of such compensation incurred by us during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
Type of service	2013		2012		2013		2012
Asset management fees	$	38	$	38	$	115	$	115
Property management fees		12		12		35		34
Leasing costs		—		2		8		98
Development costs		—		86		—		258
Interest expense-related party		64		44		96		106
Administrative cost reimbursements		75		78		208		213
	$	189	$	260	$	462	$	824

XML

NOTES PAYABLE (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of outstanding debt

          Our outstanding debt as of September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, was as follows (in thousands).

Notes payable	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Village on the Green	$	5,820	$	5,891
Woodlake Pointe		—		6,249
Total	$	5,820	$	12,140

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV LP
Entity Central Index Key	0001382787
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2013
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	No
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	No
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013

XML

CONCENTRATIONS (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Risks and Uncertainties [Abstract]

Schedule of base rents generated by entity's top tenants

The following table details the base rents generated by our top tenants during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
Tenant	2013		2012		2013		2012
LA Fitness (1)	$	241	$	—	$	720	$	—
Paesano’s		39		49		148		148
Alamo Heights Pediatrics		18		18		53		53
Rouse Dental		20		14		48		42
Café Salsita		7		9		26		28
Total	$	325	$	90	$	995	$	271

(1) LA Fitness occupied the newly constructed building at our Woodlake Pointe property, which was sold on September 30, 2013. See Note 3. We will receive no further rent from this tenant in future reporting periods.