UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

R  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2012

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____  to ____

Commission file number: 001-33245

EMPLOYERS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	04-3850065 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
10375 Professional Circle, Reno, Nevada  89521 (Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(888) 682-6671

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes R No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer R Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No R

Class	July 31, 2012
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share	30,811,413 shares outstanding

		Page No.
PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Consolidated Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011	3
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	4
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	5
	Unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	25
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	25
	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	26
Item 1A	Risk Factors	26
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	26
Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	26
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	26
Item 5	Other Information	26
Item 6	Exhibits	27

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Consolidated Financial Statements

Employers Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
	As of			As of
	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Assets	(unaudited)
Available for sale:
Fixed maturity securities at fair value (amortized cost $1,742,607 at June 30, 2012 and $1,706,216 at December 31, 2011)	$	1,892,648		$	1,852,699
Equity securities at fair value (cost $80,247 at June 30, 2012 and $64,962 at December 31, 2011)	122,262			98,046
Total investments	2,014,910			1,950,745
Cash and cash equivalents	208,791			252,300
Restricted cash and cash equivalents	7,141			6,299
Accrued investment income	19,331			19,537
Premiums receivable (less bad debt allowance of $6,046 at June 30, 2012 and $5,546 at December 31, 2011)	216,719			160,443
Reinsurance recoverable for:
Paid losses	9,654			10,729
Unpaid losses	920,047			940,840
Funds held by or deposited with reinsureds	3,395			1,102
Deferred policy acquisition costs	40,742			37,524
Federal income taxes recoverable	1,117			1,993
Deferred income taxes, net	25,443			22,140
Property and equipment, net	12,099			11,360
Intangible assets, net	11,122			11,728
Goodwill	36,192			36,192
Other assets	13,576			18,812
Total assets	$	3,540,279		$	3,481,744
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Claims and policy liabilities:
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	2,281,789		$	2,272,363
Unearned premiums	257,779			194,933
Policyholders’ dividends accrued	3,096			3,838
Total claims and policy liabilities	2,542,664			2,471,134
Commissions and premium taxes payable	35,523			28,905
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	14,845			14,994
Deferred reinsurance gain—LPT Agreement	345,210			353,194
Notes payable	122,000			122,000
Other liabilities	25,386			17,331
Total liabilities	3,085,628			3,007,558
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 54,069,136 and 53,948,442 shares issued and 30,947,550 and 32,996,809 shares outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively	541			540
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	321,262			318,989
Retained earnings	366,089			358,693
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net	124,836			116,719
Treasury stock, at cost (23,121,586 shares at June 30, 2012 and 20,951,633 shares at December 31, 2011)	(358,077		)	(320,755		)
Total stockholders’ equity	454,651			474,186
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	3,540,279		$	3,481,744

See accompanying unaudited notes to the consolidated financial statements.

3

Employers Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenues	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Net premiums earned	$	118,955		$	88,128		$	228,855		$	170,555
Net investment income	18,297			20,306			36,682			40,799
Realized gains on investments, net	945			1,102			2,723			1,336
Other income	114			3			195			123
Total revenues	138,311			109,539			268,455			212,813
Expenses
Losses and loss adjustment expenses	88,293			64,150			169,216			123,571
Commission expense	16,147			11,119			29,676			21,400
Policyholder dividends	803			914			1,650			1,926
Underwriting and other operating expenses	29,513			26,200			61,655			51,878
Interest expense	858			908			1,760			1,825
Total expenses	135,614			103,291			263,957			200,600
Net income before income taxes	2,697			6,248			4,498			12,213
Income tax benefit	(2,309		)	(2,003		)	(6,730		)	(4,383		)
Net income	$	5,006		$	8,251		$	11,228		$	16,596
Comprehensive income
Unrealized gains during the period (net of taxes of $2,070 and $10,794 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $5,324 and $9,264 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively)	$	3,844		$	18,866		$	9,888		$	16,022
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized gains in net income (net of taxes of $331 and $386 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $952 and $468 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively)	614			716			1,771			868
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	3,230			18,150			8,117			15,154
Total comprehensive income	$	8,236		$	26,401		$	19,345		$	31,750
Earnings per common share (Note 10):
Basic	$	0.16		$	0.21		$	0.35		$	0.43
Diluted	$	0.16		$	0.21		$	0.35		$	0.43
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.06		$	0.06		$	0.12		$	0.12
Realized gains on investments, net
Net realized gains on investments before credit related impairments on fixed maturity securities	$	1,005		$	1,102		$	3,252		$	1,336
Other than temporary impairment, credit losses recognized in earnings	(60		)	—			(529		)	—
Portion of impairment recognized in other comprehensive income	—			—			—			—
Realized gains on investments, net	$	945		$	1,102		$	2,723		$	1,336

See accompanying unaudited notes to the consolidated financial statements.

4

Employers Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012			2011
Operating activities	(unaudited)
Net income	$	11,228		$	16,596
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	2,787			3,387
Stock-based compensation	2,542			1,756
Amortization of premium on investments, net	3,400			3,937
Allowance for doubtful accounts	500			(870		)
Deferred income tax expense	(7,675		)	(2,186		)
Realized gains on investments, net	(2,723		)	(1,336		)
Realized losses on retirement of assets	334			121
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income	206			1,066
Premiums receivable	(56,776		)	(38,942		)
Reinsurance recoverable for paid and unpaid losses	21,868			23,084
Funds held by or deposited with reinsureds	(2,293		)	1,155
Federal income taxes recoverable	876			(2,344		)
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses	9,426			(24,198		)
Unearned premiums	62,846			35,561
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	7,906			2,377
Deferred reinsurance gain – LPT Agreement	(7,984		)	(8,781		)
Other	7,893			2,329
Net cash provided by operating activities	54,361			12,712
Investing activities
Purchase of fixed maturities	(183,315		)	(61,495		)
Purchase of equity securities	(23,768		)	(2,096		)
Proceeds from sale of fixed maturities	69,722			96,993
Proceeds from sale of equity securities	8,916			2,181
Proceeds from maturities and redemptions of investments	76,091			49,457
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets	75			—
Capital expenditures and other	(3,326		)	(2,603		)
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (used in) provided by investing activities	(842		)	11,817
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(56,447		)	94,254
Financing activities
Acquisition of treasury stock	(37,322		)	(21,060		)
Cash transactions related to stock-based compensation	(279		)	764
Dividends paid to stockholders	(3,822		)	(4,613		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(41,423		)	(24,909		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(43,509		)	82,057
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period	252,300			119,825
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	208,791		$	201,882

See accompanying unaudited notes to the consolidated financial statements.

5

Employers Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Operations

Employers Holdings, Inc. (EHI) is a Nevada holding company. Through its wholly owned insurance subsidiaries, Employers Insurance Company of Nevada (EICN), Employers Compensation Insurance Company (ECIC), Employers Preferred Insurance Company (EPIC), and Employers Assurance Company (EAC), EHI is engaged in the commercial property and casualty insurance industry, specializing in workers' compensation products and services. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the “Company” refer to EHI, together with its subsidiaries.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for an entire year. These financial statements have been prepared consistent with the accounting policies described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The Company considers an operating segment to be any component of its business whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision makers to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance based on discrete financial information. Currently, the Company has one operating segment, workers’ compensation insurance and related services.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. The most significant areas that require management judgment are unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (LAE), reinsurance recoverables, premium revenue, deferred income taxes, investments, and goodwill and intangible assets.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

2. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs (DAC)

In October 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance on Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts that became effective in 2012. This guidance changed the definition of acquisition costs which may be capitalized to specify costs that relate directly to the successful acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts, including underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection, and sales force contract selling. It also defines incremental direct costs that must be capitalized as costs that result directly from contract transactions that are essential to contract issuance, which would not have been incurred had the contract transaction not occurred. All other costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized costs are amortized over the life of the contract.

The Company adopted this standard on a prospective basis on January 1, 2012. Under the new guidance, the Company capitalized acquisition costs totaling $23.1 million and $45.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Under the previous guidance, the amount capitalized would have been $26.8 million and $52.5 million for the same periods. The total effect of implementing this guidance was a $3.7 million and $7.3 million decrease in the amount capitalized and a $1.5 million and $2.1 million decrease in the amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The total amortization expense was $21.2 million and $42.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The net effect of implementing this guidance was a $2.2 million and $5.2 million increase in underwriting and other operating expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The Company expects that the total impact of this new guidance for 2012 will be approximately $7 million in increased underwriting and other operating expenses.

6

3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value and the estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:

	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Financial assets
Investments	$	2,014,910	$	2,014,910	$	1,950,745	$	1,950,745
Cash and cash equivalents	208,791		208,791		252,300		252,300
Restricted cash and cash equivalents	7,141		7,141		6,299		6,299
Financial liabilities
Notes payable	122,000		127,325		122,000		130,447

The Company's estimates of fair value for financial liabilities are based on a combination of the variable interest rates for the Company's existing line of credit and notes with similar durations to discount the projection of future payments on notes payable, and have been determined to be Level 2 fair value measurements, as defined below. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the levels of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Level inputs are defined as follows:

• Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.

• Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 prices that are observable for similar assets or liabilities through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.

• Level 3 - Inputs that are unobservable that reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

The following methods and assumptions were used to determine the fair value of each class of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets.

Fair value of available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities is based on quoted market prices, where available, and is obtained primarily from third party pricing services, who generally use Level 1 or Level 2 inputs. The Company obtains a quoted price for each security from third party pricing services. The quoted prices are derived through recently reported trades for identical or similar securities. For securities not actively traded, the third party pricing services may use quoted market prices of similar instruments or discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating inputs that are currently observable in the markets for similar securities. Inputs that are often used in the valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, broker quotes, benchmark yields, credit spreads, default rates, and prepayment speeds. The Company also performs quarterly analysis on the prices received from third party pricing services to determine whether the prices are reasonable estimates of fair value, including confirming the fair values of these securities through observable market prices using an alternative pricing source. If unusual fluctuations are noted in this review, the Company may obtain additional information from other pricing services to validate the quoted price. There were no adjustments to prices obtained from third party pricing services as of June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011 that were material to the consolidated financial statements.

If quoted market prices and an estimate determined by using objectively verifiable information are unavailable, the Company produces an estimate of fair value based on internally developed valuation techniques, which, depending on the level of observable market inputs, will render the fair value estimate as Level 2 or Level 3. The Company bases all of its estimates of fair value for assets on the bid price as it represents what a third party market participant would be willing to pay in an arm's length transaction.

These methods of valuation will only produce an estimate of fair value if there is objectively verifiable information to produce a valuation. If objectively verifiable information is not available, the Company would be required to produce an estimate of fair value using some of the same methodologies, making assumptions for market based inputs that are unavailable.

Most estimates of fair value for fixed maturity securities are based on estimates using objectively verifiable information and are included in the amount disclosed in Level 2 of the hierarchy. The fair value estimates for determining Level 3 fair value include the Company's assumptions about risk assessments and market participant assumptions based on the best information available, including quotes from market makers and other broker/dealers recognized as market participants, using standard or trade derived inputs, new issue data, monthly payment information, cash flow generation, prepayment speeds, spread adjustments, or rating updates.

7

The following table presents the items on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets that are stated at fair value and the fair value measurements.

	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasuries	$	—	$	150,778	$	—	$	—	$	137,365	$	—
U.S. Agencies	—		101,880		—		—		108,448		—
States and municipalities	—		784,617		—		—		789,636		—
Corporate securities	—		551,651		—		—		501,669		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	—		257,462		—		—		281,511		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	—		30,574		—		—		21,665		—
Asset-backed securities	—		15,686		—		—		12,405		—
Total fixed maturity securities	—		1,892,648		—		—		1,852,699		—
Equity securities	$	122,262	$	—	$	—	$	98,046	$	—	$	—

4. Investments

The cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the Company’s investments were as follows:

	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
At June 30, 2012
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasuries	$	136,989	$	13,797	$	(8	)	$	150,778
U.S. Agencies	95,411		6,469		—			101,880
States and municipalities	716,929		68,054		(366		)	784,617
Corporate securities	509,341		42,498		(188		)	551,651
Residential mortgage-backed securities	238,950		18,915		(403		)	257,462
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	29,615		959		—			30,574
Asset-backed securities	15,372		314		—			15,686
Total fixed maturity securities	1,742,607		151,006		(965		)	1,892,648
Equity securities	80,247		43,281		(1,266		)	122,262
Total investments	$	1,822,854	$	194,287	$	(2,231	)	$	2,014,910

At December 31, 2011
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasuries	$	122,144	$	15,222	$	(1	)	$	137,365
U.S. Agencies	101,520		6,942		(14		)	108,448
States and municipalities	719,431		70,391		(186		)	789,636
Corporate securities	467,470		35,745		(1,546		)	501,669
Residential mortgage-backed securities	262,961		19,154		(604		)	281,511
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	20,756		910		(1		)	21,665
Asset-backed securities	11,934		471		—			12,405
Total fixed maturity securities	1,706,216		148,835		(2,352		)	1,852,699
Equity securities	64,962		34,639		(1,555		)	98,046
Total investments	$	1,771,178	$	183,474	$	(3,907	)	$	1,950,745

8

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities at June 30, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	92,460	$	94,062
Due after one year through five years	608,596		649,520
Due after five years through ten years	540,681		606,228
Due after ten years	216,933		239,116
Mortgage and asset-backed securities	283,937		303,722
Total	$	1,742,607	$	1,892,648

9

The following is a summary of investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and for 12 months or greater as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Number of Issues	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Number of Issues
	(dollars in thousands)
Less than 12 months:
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasuries	$	13,893	$	(8	)	5	$	5,076	$	(1	)	2
U.S. Agencies	—		—			—	11,124		(14		)	3
States and municipalities	29,189		(366		)	8	5,094		(185		)	1
Corporate securities	19,834		(175		)	10	64,846		(1,481		)	30
Residential mortgage-backed securities	164		(2		)	15	4,916		(20		)	14
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	—		—			—	1,464		(1		)	1
Total fixed maturity securities	63,080		(551		)	38	92,520		(1,702		)	51
Equity securities	13,621		(1,223		)	46	12,443		(1,462		)	57
Total less than 12 months	$	76,701	$	(1,774	)	84	$	104,963	$	(3,164	)	108
12 months or greater:
Fixed maturity securities
States and municipalities	—		—			—	1,049		(1		)	1
Corporate securities	1,070		(13		)	1	1,024		(65		)	1
Residential mortgage-backed securities	2,572		(401		)	5	2,692		(584		)	5
Total fixed maturity securities	3,642		(414		)	6	4,765		(650		)	7
Equity securities	444		(43		)	7	452		(93		)	4
Total 12 months or greater	$	4,086	$	(457	)	13	$	5,217	$	(743	)	11
Total available-for-sale:
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasuries	$	13,893	$	(8	)	5	$	5,076	$	(1	)	2
U.S. Agencies	—		—			—	11,124		(14		)	3
States and municipalities	29,189		(366		)	8	6,143		(186		)	2
Corporate securities	20,904		(188		)	11	65,870		(1,546		)	31
Residential mortgage-backed securities	2,736		(403		)	20	7,608		(604		)	19
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	—		—			—	1,464		(1		)	1
Total fixed maturity securities	66,722		(965		)	44	97,285		(2,352		)	58
Equity securities	14,065		(1,266		)	53	12,895		(1,555		)	61
Total available-for-sale	$	80,787	$	(2,231	)	97	$	110,180	$	(3,907	)	119

Based on reviews of the fixed maturity securities, the Company determined that unrealized losses as of June 30, 2012 were primarily the result of changes in prevailing interest rates and not the credit quality of the issuers. The fixed maturity securities whose total fair value was less than amortized cost were not determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired given the severity and duration of the impairment, the credit quality of the issuers, the Company’s intent to not sell the securities, and a determination that it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities until fair value recovers to above cost, or to maturity.

10

Based on reviews of the equity securities as of June 30, 2012, the Company recognized total impairments of $0.5 million in the fair values of seven equity securities as a result of the severity and duration of the change in fair values of those securities.

Realized gains on investments, net and the change in unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity and equity securities are determined on a specific-identification basis and were as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Realized gains on investments, net
Fixed maturity securities
Gross gains	$	592		$	866		$	2,295		$	932
Gross losses	—			(55		)	(5		)	(148		)
Realized gains on fixed maturity securities, net	$	592		$	811		$	2,290		$	784
Equity securities
Gross gains	$	613		$	291		$	1,161		$	555
Gross losses	(260		)	—			(728		)	(3		)
Realized gains on equity securities, net	$	353		$	291		$	433		$	552
Total	$	945		$	1,102		$	2,723		$	1,336
Change in unrealized gains (losses)
Fixed maturity securities	$	8,015		$	28,395		$	3,558		$	19,458
Equity securities	(3,047		)	163			8,931			4,492
Total	$	4,968		$	28,558		$	12,489		$	23,950

Net investment income was as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities	$	18,019		$	20,349		$	36,237		$	40,893
Equity securities	777			469			1,424			918
Cash equivalents and restricted cash	120			91			275			196
	18,916			20,909			37,936			42,007
Investment expenses	(619		)	(603		)	(1,254		)	(1,208		)
Net investment income	$	18,297		$	20,306		$	36,682		$	40,799

The Company is required by various state laws and regulations to keep securities or letters of credit in depository accounts with the states in which it does business. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, securities having a fair value of $528.4 million and $522.6 million, respectively, were on deposit. These laws and regulations govern not only the amount, but also the types of securities that are eligible for deposit. The deposits are limited to fixed maturity securities in all states. Additionally, certain reinsurance contracts require Company funds to be held in trust for the benefit of the ceding reinsurer to secure the outstanding liabilities assumed by the Company. The fair value of securities held in trust for reinsurance at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $34.4 million and $40.3 million, respectively. A portion of the Company's debt was secured by fixed maturity securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents that had a fair value of $114.5 million and $126.7 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

11

5. Income Taxes

Income tax expense for interim periods is measured using an estimated effective tax rate for the annual period. The following is a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rates for the periods presented.

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012		2011
Expense computed at statutory rate	35.0	%	35.0	%
Dividends received deduction and tax-exempt interest	(110.6	)	(46.3	)
LPT Agreement	(73.6	)	(25.0	)
Other	(0.4	)	0.4
Effective tax rate	(149.6	)%	(35.9	)%

6. Liability for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

The following table represents a reconciliation of changes in the liability for unpaid losses and LAE.

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012		2011
	(in thousands)
Unpaid losses and LAE, gross of reinsurance, at beginning of period	$	2,272,363	$	2,279,729
Less reinsurance recoverables for unpaid losses and LAE	940,840		956,043
Net unpaid losses and LAE at beginning of period	1,331,523		1,323,686
Losses and LAE, net of reinsurance, related to:
Current period	176,145		131,885
Prior periods	1,054		467
Total net losses and LAE incurred during the period	177,199		132,352
Deduct payments for losses and LAE, net of reinsurance, related to:
Current period	18,520		15,367
Prior periods	128,460		121,694
Total net payments for losses and LAE during the period	146,980		137,061
Ending unpaid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance	1,361,742		1,318,977
Reinsurance recoverable for unpaid losses and LAE	920,047		936,554
Unpaid losses and LAE, gross of reinsurance, at end of period	$	2,281,789	$	2,255,531

Total net losses and LAE included in the above table excludes the impact of the amortization of the deferred reinsurance gain—LPT Agreement (Deferred Gain) (Note 7).

The increase in the estimates of incurred losses and LAE attributable to insured events for prior periods was entirely related to the Company's assigned risk business.

7. LPT Agreement

The Company is party to a 100% quota share retroactive reinsurance agreement (LPT Agreement) under which $1.5 billion in liabilities for losses and LAE related to claims incurred by EICN prior to July 1, 1995 were reinsured for consideration of $775.0 million. The LPT Agreement provides coverage up to $2.0 billion. The initial Deferred Gain resulting from the LPT Agreement was recorded as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and is being amortized using the recovery method, whereby the amortization is determined by the proportion of actual reinsurance recoveries to total estimated recoveries. The Company amortized $8.0 million and $8.8 million of the Deferred Gain for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Any adjustments to the Deferred Gain are recorded in losses and LAE incurred in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income. No adjustments occurred in the current period. The remaining Deferred Gain was $345.2 millionand $353.2 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The estimated remaining liabilities subject to the LPT Agreement were $789.3 million and $807.5 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Losses and LAE paid with respect to the LPT Agreement totaled $588.2 million and $569.9 million through June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

12

8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, net

Accumulated other comprehensive income is comprised of unrealized gains on investments classified as available-for-sale, net of deferred tax expense. The following table summarizes the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Net unrealized gain on investments, before taxes	$	192,056		$	179,567
Deferred tax expense on net unrealized gains	(67,220		)	(62,848		)
Total accumulated other comprehensive income, net	$	124,836		$	116,719

9. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company awarded stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share awards (PSAs) to certain officers and Directors of the Company as follows:

	Number Awarded	Fair Value on Date of Grant		Exercise Price		Aggregate Fair Value on Date of Grant
						(in millions)
March 2012
Stock options(1)	242,300	$	5.64	$	17.02	$	1.4
Restricted stock units(1)	79,450	17.02		—		1.4
Performance share awards(2)	158,900	17.02		—		2.7
May 2012
Restricted stock units(1)	36,355	17.40		—		0.6

(1) The stock options and RSUs were awarded to certain officers of the Company and have a service vesting period of four years after the date awarded and vest 25% on each of the subsequent four anniversaries of the grant date. The stock options and RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances, such as: death or disability, or in connection with change of control of the Company. The stock options expire seven years from the date of grant.

The RSUs awarded in May 2012 include 27,584 RSUs granted to non-employee Directors of the Company that have a service vesting period of one year from the date awarded.

(2) The PSAs have a performance period of three years and are subject to certain performance goals, based on the Company's statutory combined ratio, with payouts that range from 0% to 200% of the target awards.

A total of 25,944 and 92,646 stock options were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011, respectively.

13

10. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income applicable to stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilutive impact of all convertible securities on earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share includes shares assumed issued under the “treasury stock method,” which reflects the potential dilution that would occur if outstanding options were to be exercised. The following table presents the net income and the weighted average shares outstanding used in the earnings per common share calculations.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(in thousands, except share data)
Net income available to stockholders—basic and diluted	$	5,006	$	8,251	$	11,228	$	16,596
Weighted average number of shares outstanding—basic	31,537,452		38,468,113		32,093,328		38,570,576
Effect of dilutive securities:
Performance share awards	20,229		—		8,975		—
Stock options	82,385		75,880		87,747		84,941
Restricted stock units	45,570		52,320		52,541		66,507
Dilutive potential shares	148,184		128,200		149,263		151,448
Weighted average number of shares outstanding—diluted	31,685,636		38,596,313		32,242,591		38,722,024

Diluted earnings per share exclude outstanding options and other common stock equivalents in periods where the inclusion of such options and common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive. The following table presents options and RSUs that were excluded from diluted earnings per share.

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2012	2011	2012	2011
Options excluded as the exercise price was greater than the average market price	934,597	1,041,836	934,597	1,041,836
Options and RSUs excluded under the treasury method, as the potential proceeds on settlement or exercise price was greater than the value of shares acquired	654,123	453,810	555,084	453,810

14

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” or similar terms refer to Employers Holdings, Inc. (EHI), together with its subsidiaries. The information contained in this quarterly report is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this quarterly report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (Annual Report).

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements if accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. You should not place undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Forward-looking statements include those related to our expected financial position, business, financing plans, litigation, future premiums, revenues, earnings, pricing, investments, business relationships, expected losses, loss reserves, acquisitions, competition, rate increases with respect to our business, and the insurance industry in general. Statements including words such as “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “anticipate,” “will” or similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. All forward-looking statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results, depending on a number of factors. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in our Annual Report and other documents that we have filed with the SEC.

Overview

We are a Nevada holding company. Through our insurance subsidiaries, we provide workers’ compensation insurance coverage to select, small businesses in low to medium hazard industries. Workers’ compensation insurance is provided under a statutory system wherein most employers are required to provide coverage for their employees’ medical, disability, vocational rehabilitation, and/or death benefit costs for work-related injuries or illnesses. We provide workers’ compensation insurance in 31 states and the District of Columbia, with a concentration in California, where over one-half of our business is generated. Our revenues are primarily comprised of net premiums earned, net investment income, and net realized gains on investments.

We target small businesses, as we believe that this market is traditionally characterized by fewer competitors, more attractive pricing, and stronger persistency when compared to the U.S. workers’ compensation insurance industry in general. We believe we are able to price our policies at levels that are competitive and profitable over the long-term. Our underwriting approach is to consistently underwrite small business accounts at appropriate and competitive prices without sacrificing long-term profitability and stability for short-term top-line revenue growth.

Our goal is to maintain our focus on disciplined underwriting and to continue to pursue profitable growth opportunities across market cycles; however, we continue to be affected by the impacts of the 2008-2009 recession. The pace of recovery remains persistently slow and, although total employment and payroll are increasing, we do not believe overall economic conditions will change significantly in the near-term.

We market and sell our workers' compensation insurance products through independent local, regional, and national agents and brokers; through our strategic partnerships and alliances, including our principal partners ADP, Inc. and Anthem Blue Cross of California; and through relationships with national and regional trade groups and associations, including the National Federation of Independent Business.

Results of Operations

Overall, net income was $5.0 million and $11.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $8.3 million and $16.6 million for the corresponding periods of 2011. We recognized underwriting losses of $15.8 million and $33.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to underwriting losses of $14.3 million and $28.2 million for the same periods of 2011. Underwriting income or loss is determined by deducting losses and LAE, commission expense, policyholder dividends, and underwriting and other operating expenses from net premiums earned. Key factors that affected our financial performance during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period of 2011, include:

• Gross premiums written increased 42% and 40%;

• Net premiums earned increased 35% and 34%;

• Losses and LAE increased 38% and 37%;

15

• Underwriting and other operating expenses increased 13% and 19%; and

• Income tax benefit increased to $2.3 million and $6.7 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $2.0 million and $4.4 million for the corresponding periods of 2011.

Additionally, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued guidance that, beginning in 2012, changed the definition of policy acquisition costs which may be capitalized. Our underwriting and other operating expenses increased $2.2 million and $5.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 as a result of this change (see Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). We expect that the total impact for 2012 will be approximately $7 million in increased underwriting and other operating expenses.

We measure our performance by our ability to increase stockholders’ equity, including the impact of the deferred reinsurance gain–LPT Agreement (Deferred Gain), over the long-term. The following table shows our stockholders' equity including the Deferred Gain, stockholders' equity on a GAAP basis, and number of common shares outstanding at:

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(in thousands, expect share data)
Stockholders' equity including the Deferred Gain(1)	$	799,861	$	827,380
GAAP stockholders' equity	$	454,651	$	474,186
Common shares outstanding	30,947,550		32,996,809

(1) Stockholders' equity, including the Deferred Gain, is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as total stockholders' equity plus the Deferred Gain, which we believe is an important supplemental measure of our capital position.

The comparative components of net income are set forth in the following table:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Gross premiums written	$	153,094		$	107,830		$	295,888		$	211,057
Net premiums written	$	150,364		$	105,566		290,728			206,692
Net premiums earned	$	118,955		$	88,128		$	228,855		$	170,555
Net investment income	18,297			20,306			36,682			40,799
Realized gains on investments	945			1,102			2,723			1,336
Other income	114			3			195			123
Total revenues	138,311			109,539			268,455			212,813
Losses and LAE	88,293			64,150			169,216			123,571
Commission expense	16,147			11,119			29,676			21,400
Policyholder dividends	803			914			1,650			1,926
Underwriting and other operating expenses	29,513			26,200			61,655			51,878
Interest expense	858			908			1,760			1,825
Income tax benefit	(2,309		)	(2,003		)	(6,730		)	(4,383		)
Total expenses	133,305			101,288			257,227			196,217
Net income	$	5,006		$	8,251		$	11,228		$	16,596
Less impact of the Deferred Gain	$	3,828		$	4,262		$	7,984		$	8,782
Net income before impact of the Deferred Gain(1)	$	1,178		$	3,989		$	3,244		$	7,814

(1) We define net income before impact of the Deferred Gain as net income less: (a) amortization of Deferred Gain and (b) adjustments to LPT Agreement ceded reserves. Deferred Gain reflects the unamortized gain from our LPT Agreement. Under GAAP, this gain is deferred and is being amortized using the recovery method, whereby the amortization is determined by the proportion of actual reinsurance recoveries to total estimated recoveries, and the amortization is reflected in losses and LAE. We periodically reevaluate the remaining direct reserves subject to the LPT Agreement. Our reevaluation results in corresponding adjustments, if needed, to reserves, ceded reserves, reinsurance recoverables, and the Deferred Gain, with the net effect being an increase or decrease, as the case may be, to net income. Net income before impact of the Deferred Gain is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP, but rather reflects the difference in accounting treatment between statutory and GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income before income taxes, net income, or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP.

16

We present net income before impact of the Deferred Gain because we believe that it is an important supplemental measure of operating performance to be used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in evaluating us. The LPT Agreement was a non-recurring transaction and the Deferred Gain does not result in ongoing cash benefits. Consequently, we believe this presentation is useful in providing a meaningful understanding of our operating performance. In addition, we believe this non-GAAP measure, as we have defined it, is helpful to our management in identifying trends in our performance because the excluded item has limited significance on our current and ongoing operations.

Net Premiums Earned

Net premiums earned increased35.0% and 34.2% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the corresponding periods in 2011. These increases are primarily due to increasing policy count as we continue to execute our strategy.

The following table shows the percentage change in our in-force premium, policy count, average policy size, payroll exposure upon which our premiums are based, and net rate.

	As of June 30, 2012
	Year-to-Date Increase		Year-Over-Year Increase (Decrease)
In-force premiums	20.9	%	37.2	%
In-force policy count	18.6		38.3
Average in-force policy size	1.9		(0.8	)
In-force payroll exposure	16.1		32.2
Net rate(1)	4.1		3.8

(1) Net rate, defined as total premium in-force divided by total insured payroll exposure, is a function of a variety of factors, including rate changes, underwriting risk profiles and pricing, and changes in business mix related to economic and competitive pressures.

Our in-force premiums and number of policies in-force by select states were as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011			June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
State	Premiums In-force		Policies In-force	Premiums In-force		Policies In-force	Premiums In-force		Policies In-force	Premiums In-force		Policies In-force
	(dollars in thousands)
California	$	274,379	42,577	$	221,910	36,867	$	191,684	32,987	$	172,621	29,244
Illinois	28,816		3,125	24,744		2,433	22,690		1,574	18,617		932
Georgia	19,882		2,628	16,393		2,050	12,915		1,387	10,772		757
Florida	16,909		2,723	15,226		2,399	14,885		2,212	15,071		1,963
Nevada	15,748		3,845	14,639		3,718	15,932		3,622	16,940		3,596
Other	120,473		17,073	101,009		13,226	89,067		10,256	87,116		8,069
Total	$	476,207	71,971	$	393,921	60,693	$	347,173	52,038	$	321,137	44,561

Our strategic partnerships and alliances generated $109.5 million and $80.5 million, or 23.0% and 23.2%, of our in-force premiums as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We believe that the bundling of products and services through these relationships contributes to higher retention rates than business generated by our independent agents. These relationships also allow us to access new customers that we may not have access to through our independent agent distribution channel. We continue to expand our existing relationships and actively seek new partnerships and alliances.

In April 2011, the Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau (WCIRB) of California provided an informational filing highlighting the cost drivers that indicated a cumulative 39.8% increase in the claims cost benchmark since January 1, 2009 based on an analysis of December 31, 2010 loss experience. This included deterioration of more than 12 percentage points in the claims cost benchmark since the WCIRB's previous recommendation for a 27.7% increase based on an analysis of June 30, 2010 loss experience. The WCIRB indicated that this further deterioration was due to: (a) continued adverse loss development on the 2009 accident year; (b) high emerging costs on the 2010 accident year, primarily due to increased claims frequency; (c) less optimistic forecasts for statewide wage growth in California; and (d) increased LAE that is likely as a result of certain Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decisions.

17

In August 2011, the WCIRB modified its benchmark for pure premium rates. The WCIRB's pure premium rate filings are now based on the industry average filed pure premium rate, rather than the pure premium rate approved by the California Commissioner of Insurance. The WCIRB submitted its benchmark for the proposed advisory pure premium rate to be effective January 1, 2012. The WCIRB noted that while 2012 projected claims costs continue to be below pre-reform highs and the proposed pure premium rate was slightly less than the industry average filed rate, these rates reflected significant deterioration in projected losses and LAE and less optimistic economic forecasts, compared to the prior year.

In April 2012, the WCIRB submitted its pure premium rate filing recommending an increase in advisory pure premium rates to be effective July 1, 2012. That filing proposed a 4.1% increase over the industry average filed pure premium rate as of January 1, 2012. The filing was based on an analysis of December 31, 2011 experience and reflects increased loss development on the 2010 and 2011 accident years, increased LAE, and lower forecasts of wage growth in California for 2012 and 2013.

We set our own premium rates in California based upon actuarial analyses of current and anticipated loss trends with a goal of maintaining underwriting profitability. Due to increasing loss costs, primarily medical cost inflation, we have increased our filed premium rates in California by a cumulative 41.3% since February 1, 2009.

The following table sets forth the percentage increases to our filed California rates effective for new and renewal policies incepting on or after the dates shown.

Effective Date	Premium Rate Change Filed in California
February 1, 2009	10.0	%
August 15, 2009	10.5
March 15, 2010	3.0
March 15, 2011	2.5
September 15, 2011	3.9
June 15, 2012	6.0

We expect that total premiums in 2012 across our markets will continue to reflect:

• overall rate increases;

• increasing policy count as we continue to execute our strategy;

• increasing average policy size; and

• lessened competitive pressures.

Net Investment Income and Realized Gains on Investments

We invest our holding company assets, statutory surplus, and the funds supporting our insurance liabilities, including unearned premiums and unpaid losses and LAE. We invest in fixed maturity securities, equity securities, and cash equivalents. Net investment income includes interest and dividends earned on our invested assets and amortization of premiums and discounts on our fixed maturity securities, less bank service charges and custodial and portfolio management fees. We have established a high quality/short duration bias in our investment portfolio.

Net investment income decreased9.9% and 10.1% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2011. The decrease was primarily related to decreases in the average pre-tax book yield on invested assets to 3.7% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 4.2% for the same periods of 2011. The tax-equivalent yield on invested assets decreased to 4.8% at June 30, 2012, compared to 5.2% at June 30, 2011.

Realized gains and losses on our investments are reported separately from our net investment income. Realized gains and losses on investments include the gain or loss on a security at the time of sale compared to its original or adjusted cost (equity securities) or amortized cost (fixed maturity securities). Realized losses are also recognized when securities are written down as a result of an other-than-temporary impairment.

Net realized gains on investments were $0.9 million and $2.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $1.1 million and $1.3 million for the corresponding periods of 2011.

Additional information regarding our Investments is set forth under “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Investments.”

18

Combined Ratio

The combined ratio, expressed as a percentage, is a key measurement of underwriting profitability. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and LAE ratio, the commission expense ratio, policyholder dividends ratio, and underwriting and other operating expenses ratio. When the combined ratio is below 100%, we have recorded underwriting income, and conversely, when the combined ratio is greater than 100%, we cannot be profitable without investment income. Because we only have one operating segment, holding company expenses are included in our calculation of the combined ratio.

The following table provides the calculation of our calendar year combined ratios.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Loss and LAE ratio	74.2	%	72.8	%	73.9	%	72.5	%
Underwriting and other operating expenses ratio	24.8		29.8		27.0		30.4
Commission expense ratio	13.6		12.6		13.0		12.5
Policyholder dividends ratio	0.7		1.0		0.7		1.1
Combined ratio	113.3	%	116.2	%	114.6	%	116.5	%

Loss and LAE Ratio. Expressed as a percentage, this is the ratio of losses and LAE to net premiums earned.

Losses and LAE represents our largest expense item and includes claim payments made, amortization of the Deferred Gain, estimates for future claim payments and changes in those estimates for current and prior periods, and costs associated with investigating, defending, and adjusting claims. The quality of our financial reporting depends in large part on accurately predicting our losses and LAE, which are inherently uncertain as they are estimates of the ultimate cost of individual claims based on actuarial estimation techniques.

In California, we are experiencing an increase in indemnity claims frequency (the number of claims expressed as a percentage of payroll). Our loss experience also indicates an upward trend in medical and indemnity costs that are reflected in our current accident year loss estimate. We are also seeing increased medical and indemnity costs in many of our other states, partially offset by continuing favorable loss cost trends in Nevada. We believe our current accident year loss estimate is adequate; however, ultimate losses will not be known with any certainty for many years. We assume that increasing medical and indemnity cost trends will continue to impact our long-term claims costs and current accident year loss estimate.

Overall, losses and LAE increased37.6% and 36.9% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2011. These increases were primarily due to increases in net earned premiums. Prior accident year loss development in both periods was entirely related to our assigned risk business. Our current accident year loss estimate was 77.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 78.0% and 77.3% for the same periods of 2011.

Excluding the impact from the LPT Agreement, losses and LAE would have been $92.1 million and $68.4 million, or 77.4% and 77.6% of net premiums earned, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, losses and LAE would have been $177.2 million and $132.4 million, or 77.4% and 77.6% of net premiums earned, respectively.

The table below reflects the losses and LAE reserve adjustments.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012			2011	2012	2011
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Prior accident year loss development, net	$	(0.5	<