XML 27 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair value measurements:
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Note 9 — Fair value measurements:

 

The fair value topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The accounting guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company currently does not have any Level 1 financial assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in non-active markets, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. The Company currently does not have any Level 2 financial assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the input used in pricing the asset or liability. As of December 31, 2011, the Company has classified the warrants with put and call rights as Level 3 (see “Note 6 – Warrant liability”). The Company estimated that the fair value of the warrants using a Black-Scholes option pricing model under various probability-weighted outcomes which take into consideration the protective, but limited, cash-settlement feature of the warrants. At issuance, the following average assumptions were assigned to the varying outcomes: expected volatility of 57%, risk free interest rate of 2.08%, expected life of five years and no dividends. The Company estimated that the fair value of the warrants at December 31, 2011 using this same model with the following average assumptions assigned to the varying outcomes: expected volatility of 72%, risk free interest rates of 0.83%, expected lives of 3.96 years and no dividends. As of December 31, 2011, the financial liabilities held by the Company and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (which consist solely of the warrant liability) were $249,561. The following table summarizes the activity for the period:

 

    Warrant Liabilities  
Fair value at December 31, 2010   $ 676,603  
Fair value adjustment at December 31, 2011     427,042  
Fair value at December 31, 2011   $ 249,561