Note 24 - Concentration of Risk

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Risks and Uncertainties [Abstract]

Concentration Risk Disclosure [Text Block]

24. Concentration of risk

Credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other receivables and prepayments and deposits to suppliers. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held by major financial institutions located in Mainland China, which management believes are of high credit quality.

Risk arising from operations in foreign countries

All of the Company’s operations are conducted within the PRC. The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to various political, economic, and other risks and uncertainties inherent in the PRC. Among other risks, the Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to the risks of restrictions on transfer of funds, changing taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions; and political conditions and governmental regulations.

Currency convertibility risk

Significant part of the Company’s businesses is transacted in RMB, which is not freely convertible into foreign currencies. All foreign exchange transactions take place either through the People’s Bank of China or other banks authorized to buy and sell foreign currencies at the exchange rates quoted by the People’s Bank of China. Approval of foreign currency payments by the People’s Bank of China or other regulatory institutions requires submitting a payment application form together with suppliers’ invoices and signed contracts. These exchange control measures imposed by the PRC government authorities may restrict the ability of the Company’s PRC subsidiary and VIEs to transfer its net assets, which to the Company through loans, advances or cash dividends.

Concentration of customers

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, two customers individually accounted for 17% and 14% of the Company’s sales, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, one of the two customers individually accounted for 11% of the Company’s sales. Except for the aforementioned customers, there was no other single customer who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s sales for the six or three months ended June 30, 2015.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, two customers individually accounted for 20% and 19% of the Company’s sales, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, the same two customers individually accounted for 30% and 17% of the Company’s sales, respectively. Except for the aforementioned customer, there was no other single customer who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s sales for the six or three months ended June 30, 2014.

As of June 30, 2015, one customer individually accounted for 21% of the Company’s accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2014, the same one customer individually accounted for 18% of the Company’s accounts receivable, another one customer individually accounted for 19% of the Company’s accounts receivable. Except for the afore-mentioned, there was no other single customer who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable as of June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Concentration of suppliers

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, two suppliers individually accounted for 50% and 32% of the Company’s cost of sales, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the same two suppliers individually accounted for 28% and 48% of the Company’s cost of sales, respectively. Except for the afore-mentioned, there was no other single supplier who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s cost of sales for the six or three months ended June 30, 2015.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, two suppliers individually accounted for 64% and 22% of the Company’s cost of sales, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, the same two suppliers individually accounted for 71% and 19% of the Company’s cost of sales, respectively. Except for the afore-mentioned, there was no other single supplier who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s cost of sales for the six or three months ended June 30, 2014.