XML 35 R33.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Note 28 - Concentration of risk
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Concentration Risk Disclosure [Text Block]
28.  Concentration of risk

Credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and prepayments and other current assets. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held by major financial institutions located in the PRC and Hong Kong, which management believes are of high credit quality.

Risk arising from operations in foreign countries

All of the Company’s operations are conducted within the PRC. The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to various political, economic, and other risks and uncertainties inherent in the PRC. Among other risks, the Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to the risks of restrictions on transfer of funds, changing taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions; and political conditions and governmental regulations.

Currency convertibility risk

Significant part of the Company’s businesses is transacted in RMB, which is not freely convertible into foreign currencies. All foreign exchange transactions take place either through the People’s Bank of China or other banks authorized to buy and sell foreign currencies at the exchange rates quoted by the People’s Bank of China. Approval of foreign currency payments by the People’s Bank of China or other regulatory institutions requires submitting a payment application form together with suppliers’ invoices and signed contracts. These exchange control measures imposed by the PRC government authorities may restrict the ability of the Company’s PRC subsidiary to transfer its net assets, which to the Company through loans, advances or cash dividends.

Concentration of Supplier

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, two suppliers accounted for 33% and 23% of the Company’s cost of sales, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, three suppliers accounted for 24%, 22% and 19% of the Company’s cost of sales, respectively.  Except for the aforementioned suppliers, there was no other single supplier who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

For the three months ended September 30, 2011, two suppliers accounted for 46% and 26% of the Company’s cost of sales, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, three suppliers accounted for 30%, 23% and 12% of the Company’s cost of sales, respectively. Except for the aforementioned suppliers, there was no other single supplier who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.