10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC  20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File Number 000-52392

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	82-0290112
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)

724 E. Metler Lane, Spokane, WA 99218

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (509) 893-0171

SECURITIES RESGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(g) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT:  Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o  No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o  No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes oNo x  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  Yes o  No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o		Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ¨  No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2013, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the last reported trading price of the registrant’s common stock on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board was $1,925,736.

At March 31, 2014, 91,805,828 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

1

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.

ANNUAL REORT ON FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 8.

2

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

This annual report on Form 10-K, includes forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements include our current expectations and projections about future results, performance, results of litigation, prospects and opportunities. We have tried to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “feel,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and are expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.

Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Gold Crest Mines, Inc. (“GCMN” or “the Company”) or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Except as required by federal securities laws, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The safe harbors of forward-looking statements provided by Section 21E of the Exchange Act are unavailable to issuers of penny stock. As we issued securities at a price below $5.00 per share, our shares are considered penny stock and such safe harbors set forth under Section 21E are unavailable to us.

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

Silver Crest Mines, Inc., the Company’s predecessor, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Idaho in 1968. The Company was organized to develop mineral properties located in the State of Idaho. The Company’s initial and subsequent efforts in the acquisition, exploration and development of potentially viable and commercial properties were unsuccessful. The Company has a history of losses and no revenues from operations. The Company’s capital needs have historically been met by the issuance of securities either through private placements, the issuance of shares for debt or the joint venture or lease of mineral properties. In June 2003, the Company merged into its wholly-owned subsidiary, Silver Crest Resources, Inc., for the purpose of changing the Company’s state of domicile to Nevada.

The Company was thereafter dormant until the completion of the share exchange effective August 1, 2006 with Niagara Mining & Development Company, Inc. (“Niagara”), an Idaho corporation formed on January 11, 2005, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. (“Kisa”), an Alaskan corporation formed on July 28, 2006. Under the terms of the share exchange, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Niagara in exchange for 37,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. At the time of the share exchange, Niagara was in the process of completing the acquisition and staking of mining claims in Alaska and Idaho. On June 20, 2008, 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Kisa were transferred from Niagara to the Company.

The following table shows the wholly owned subsidiaries of Gold Crest Mines, Inc.  All exploration activity takes place in our wholly owned subsidiary Kisa Gold Mining, Inc.

SUBSIDIARIES OF GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
Name of Subsidiary	State of Incorporation	Ownership Interest	Principal Activity
Kisa Gold Mining, Inc.	Alaska	100%	Mining exploration
Niagara Mining & Development Company, Inc.	Idaho	100%	Not active

In October 2007, our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Electronic Bulletin Board (OTCBB) under the symbol “GCMN”. Prior to October 2007 our common stock was traded on the over the counter market in the pink sheets under the symbol “GCMN.”

Any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings

There have been no bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings.

3

BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY

General Description of the Business

We are in the business of exploration, development, and if warranted the mining of properties containing valuable mineral deposits. The focus of our exploration programs is directed at precious metals, primarily gold. We continue to identify, investigate and acquire potential properties for future exploration and development when warranted.

Alaska Properties

In southwest Alaska, after the staking of two new claims, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Kisa controls or has interests in five consolidated claim blocks consisting of 274 State of Alaska mining claims covering 42,280 acres. Four of the claim blocks making up 35,240 acres comprise the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project and the remaining claim group consisting of 7,040 acres is the Company’s Buckstock Project. Previous workers located and prospected several significant precious metal showings in this remote, highly prospective portion of the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt nearly 20 years ago. The showings show many similarities in mineralization style, alteration and general geologic characteristics to Nova Gold Resources and Barrick’s Donlin Creek project and other major Kuskokwim Mineral Belt gold deposits.

In Alaska, the lands are held under and are subject to the State’s mining laws and regulations.

Competitive Business Conditions

There is aggressive competition within the minerals industry to discover and acquire properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company competes for the opportunity to participate in promising exploration projects with other entities, many of which have greater resources than the Company. In addition, the Company competes with others in efforts to obtain financing to explore and develop mineral properties.

Regulation

The Company’s activities in the United States are subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, production, labor standards, occupational health and mine safety, control of toxic substances, and other matters involving environmental protection and taxation. It is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant impact on the Company’s business, causing those activities to be economically reevaluated at that time.

Estimate of the Amount Spent on Exploration for the Last Two Years

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, The Company did not directly spend any money on exploration activities. Currently all expenses are being incurred by our joint venture partner as part of their earn-in process. See “Note 4. Mineral Properties – North Fork Option Master Earn-in Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Employees

The Company’s total number of employees is 2, which includes the CEO/President and the CFO.  The CEO and President titles are held by the same individual. The CFO and CEO/President work part time. We intend to utilize the services of consultants and contractors to provide additional services to the Company as needed.

Company Website

In October of 2012, the Company was unable to pay the dues for the domain name of www.goldcrestminesinc.com due to financial constraints.  As a result, the Company’s domain name was lost and was then purchased by a third party.  Any further references to the website www.goldcrestminesinc.com cannot be relied upon for information on our Company.  Until notified otherwise, the Company does not intend to have a presence on the World Wide Web.

Reports to Security Holders

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and therefore file periodic reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These reports may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet web site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

Our filings under the Exchange Act (including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to these reports) can be obtained at no cost, by telephone at (509) 893-0171, by mail at: Gold Crest Mines, Inc., 724 East Metler Lane, Spokane, Washington 99218, attention: Investor Relations.  These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

4

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.

5

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

ALASKA PROPERTIES

6

SOUTHWEST KUSKOKWIM PROJECT

Summary

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Kisa, after the staking of two new claims, controls or has interests in four consolidated claim blocks consisting of 230 State of Alaska mining claims covering 35,240 acres which comprise the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project. The claims consist of exploration properties in southwest Alaska approximately 90 miles east of the village of Bethel in the consolidated claim groups known as the AKO, Luna, Kisa and Gold Lake within the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt. Our claim groups of Gold Creek, Little Swift and GO were consolidated into the AKO claim group after the GO claims connected the claim groups.  The two Gosson Valley claim groups were dropped in 2012. Previous workers located and prospected several significant precious metal showings in this remote, highly prospective portion of the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt nearly 20 years ago. The showings show many similarities in mineralization style, alteration and general geologic characteristics to Nova Gold Resources and Barrick’s Donlin Creek project and other major Kuskokwim Mineral Belt gold deposits.

On March 28, 2011 Kisa executed a Master Earn-In agreement (“the Agreement”) with North Fork LLC, (“North Fork”) an Alaska limited liability company.

This agreement calls for North Fork to explore for gold deposits on Kisa’s claim blocks in the Southwest Kuskokwim Project area and the Buckstock project area (“Projects”).

The following is a breakdown of the proposed earn-in terms:

1.

The initial interest at the time North Fork exercises its option to earn into the “Projects” will be as follows:

a.

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. – 100%

b.

North Fork – 0%

2.

North Fork can acquire a 51% interest in one or more “Projects” by making an aggregate of $3,000,000 of Exploration Expenditures on or for the benefit of the claims on or before October 31, 2014.

3.

If North Fork withdraws from the Joint Venture prior to earning a 51% interest in the “Projects”, it will have no further interest in the “Projects”.

4.

North Fork can earn an additional 24% interest in the “Projects”, taking its total interest to 75% by the expenditure of an additional $3,000,000 by October 31, 2016.

5.

North Fork can earn a total interest of 90% in any of the “Projects” claim blocks by the completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study.

6.

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. will retain a free carried 10% interest in the “Projects” up to a Decision to Mine at which point it can elect to contribute at 10% or dilute to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty.

7.

North Fork is obliged to keep the Projects in “good standing”.

8.

North Fork will be the sole manager of the “Projects” and will make all decisions in regards to the exploration programs.

See “Note 4. Mineral Properties – North Fork Option Master Earn-in Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Location and Access

The Southwest Kuskokwim Project area is situated in a mountainous, high relief area located approximately 100 miles east of Bethel, Alaska and approximately 120 miles southwest of Donlin Creek and 40 miles west of the Shotgun Deposit. The project area lies along the boundary between the Bristol Bay, Kuskokwim and Bethel Recording Districts in southwest Alaska on State of Alaska lands. Bethel is the nearest community with full, year-round services. Commercial barge service from Anchorage is available from late May through early October at Bethel.

The effective work season in the project area is from July through September. The lakes in the immediate area typically remain frozen and snow covers ridges and upper slopes until late June or early July. Currently, personnel and equipment access to the area is limited to float planes capable of landing on lakes, via helicopter or via small fixed wing aircraft equipped with tundra tires.

The nearest areas to the prospects that are closed to mineral entry include Wood – Tikchik State Park located to the east of the Gold Lake and Kisa claim groups. Areas to the west and south are property of the Federal government and include the Yukon Flats National Wildlife and Togiak National Wildlife Refuges respectively. There currently are no unusual social, political or environmental encumbrances to exploration, development or production on the prospects. There are currently no roads or power available to the properties. Should attempts to develop one or more of the prospects occur, there is no guarantee that controversy will not arise as a result of any proposed development.

Geologic Setting and Deposit Types

The properties are situated in the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt in the southern portion of the Aniak-Tuluksak and southeastern

7

portion of the Bethel Mining Districts. Historically the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt has been a major placer and lode gold producer as well as the major source of mercury in Alaska since the turn of the twentieth century. Recent regional- to deposit-scale investigations by industry, academic institutions and government workers have helped better define the mineral deposit types and geologic controls in the Mineral Belt. This work has been spurred on by the discovery of major gold deposits throughout the northern and central portion of the belt, including the largest known deposit in the belt, the Donlin Creek deposit located approximately 120 miles to the northeast.

Rock sequences exposed in the Kuskokwim region consist of fault-bounded blocks consisting of Jurassic- to Tertiary-age assemblages of sedimentary, volcanic and intrusive rocks. These rocks were subsequently deformed, weakly metamorphosed and intruded by middle Cretaceous to Tertiary plutons, and associated dikes and sills, often in swarms along structural corridors. Glacial and modern flood plain deposits typically fill the broad glacially-carved valleys.

Previous Work by the Company

The Company’s past exploration efforts on the project include:

·

Completion of 2,100 square miles of high resolution airborne geophysical surveys over the project area and south of the Donlin Creek gold deposit in 2006 and 2007;

·

Completion of 17-line miles of induced polarization/resistivity surveys, 120-line miles of ground magnetics, collection of over 300 stream sediments and 250 rock samples and three soil grids on anomalies in the seven claim block area in 2006 and 2007;

·

Completion of over 3,100 feet of drilling at the Kisa Breccia target in the Kisa claim group with encouraging results in 2007;

·

Acquisition of two historic district-scale industry reconnaissance data sets and development of a proprietary steam sediment database that includes over 3,000 conventional silt and pan concentrate stream sediment samples. These samples define district-scale anomalies along distinct trends identified by the airborne geophysics and cover an area beginning at Kisa and extending 100 miles to northeast to the southern reaches of the Donlin Creek deposit;

·

Entry into a Joint Venture with Newmont Mining Corporation on the AKO and Luna prospects on May 8, 2008 which later terminated on December 12, 2008. While they were the Company’s Joint Venture partner they completed systematic rock and soil sampling on the Luna and AKO claim groups.

·

Entry into a Joint Venture with Cougar Gold LLC, who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold) who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC on the Kisa, Gold Lake, Little Swift, Gossan Valley and Gold Creek prospects. The work performed by Cougar Gold while they were the Company’s Joint Venture partner included the completion of over 3,200 feet of drilling on the Gossan Ridge prospect, Gold Lake claim group with encouraging results, the completion of a soil grid on the Gold Lake and Kisa prospects extending areas of anomalous gold mineralization and the staking of additional mining claims over the Kisa, Gold Lake, Gold Creek, Gossan Valley and Little Swift prospect areas.

·

On March 28, 2011 the Company executed a Master Earn-In agreement with North Fork to explore for gold deposits on Kisa’s claim blocks. Work completed by North Fork over the 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 seasons comprised the following;

o

Rock chip and soil sampling, as well as mapping at Luna

o

Rock chip and stream sediment sampling at AKO

o

Re-assay of drill core from Kisa

o

Pegging of joiner claims at AKO, to combine the AKO, Little Swift and Gold Creek claims

o

Rock chip, soil and stream sediment sampling at Chilly

o

Rock chip sampling at Gossan Valley

o

Work on compiling data for a National Instrument 43-101.

·

The following is work that is proposed by North Fork for the 2014 exploration season;

o

Complete detailed geophysical surveys at Luna and Chilly

o

Grid soil geochemistry at Luna

o

Diamond drilling under high grade mineralization at Luna and also testing the parallel structures

o

Mapping and prospecting on claim blocks such as Kisa, Gold Lake and AKO

Southwest Kuskokwim Project Descriptions

All the claims held under the Southwest Kuskokwim Project area are currently part of a Master Earn-in Agreement with North Fork. The agreement was finalized and executed on March 28, 2011.

AKO Prospect

The AKO claim group is located in the southwestern Kuskokwim mountains approximately 9 miles southwest of the Kisa Prospect. The Company controls approximately 11,680 acres on 73 state mining claims. In 2011, two joiner claims were

8

staked to combine the Little Swift and Gold Creek Prospects into the AKO claim to form one larger contiguous claim group. The AKO prospects were first discovered 20 years ago during a regional reconnaissance program. Follow-up included limited rock-chip sampling and field examination of several linear to ovoid iron-oxide stained ridgeline and valley-wall color anomalies within and along the faulted, western margin of the Crooked Mountain Pluton. These color anomalies are found at the headwaters of streams with strong gold and multi-element anomalies in stream sediments and pan concentrates and they are aligned along a pronounced, linear topographic feature that stretches for several miles. These prospects have never been drilled.

The Company’s exploration in the area includes compilation of historic data, completion of fixed-wing aeromagnetic and electromagnetic surveys, aerial reconnaissance mapping, stream sediment sampling and preliminary prospecting on several of the color anomalies identified to date. Stream-sediment samples from below the area of the known color anomalies and gold showings contain highly anomalous gold, arsenic, antimony, molybdenum and bismuth. Pan concentrates from streams draining these areas also contain visible gold. Follow-up work in 2007 has identified a number of targets on the property for further follow-up and possibly drill testing.

On May 8, 2008, the Company signed three separate joint venture agreements with Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (”Newmont”). During the joint venture Newmont completed a systematic reconnaissance type soil and rock chip sampling program over the AKO claim group which resulted in the delineation of two contiguous large gold anomalies on the claim group, The largest anomaly is centered over a distinctive aeromagnetic anomaly thought to represent a separate intrusive phase of the Crooked Mountain Pluton, consists of soils and rocks containing gold values greater than 0.02 ppm. This anomaly is over 13,500 feet long and 2,400 feet wide and is associated with multiple sets of sheeted quartz-sulfide vein systems. A similar and contiguous anomaly is situated adjacent to the main anomaly and has a slightly different trend and consists of soils and rock samples defining an anomalous area over 20,000 feet long and 2,700 feet wide. Neither of these anomalies has been drill tested. However on December 12, 2008, the Company received from Newmont a letter that notified of its intent to terminate the three venture agreements effective immediately.

In 2010, work performed by our current joint venture partner, North Fork consisted of re-sampling of the main soil and rock chip anomalies as confirmation of previous work. In addition, two joiner claims were pegged to connect AKO with the adjacent Little Swift and Gold Creek claim blocks. In the future, assessment work will be combined for the larger AKO claim block. During 2011, North Fork revisited the area with an independent geo and re-sampled some of the higher grade rock chips from the previous year.  All work performed in 2013 and 2012 was focused on compiling data for a National Instrument 43-101.

The Little Swift claims consisting of 2,240 acres of the AKO group and were staked to prospect a distinctively linear, contact zone between the Crooked Mountain quartz monzonite pluton and the cupola of hornfelsed sedimentary rocks. The prospect sites are staked over six large linear to ovoid iron-oxide stained ridgeline and valley wall color anomalies along the contact zone. Previous workers collected highly anomalous stream silt samples from below the area of the color anomalies.

The Gold Creek claims consisting of 1,920 acres of the AKO group were staked to prospect several iron-oxide stained color anomalies developed within the cupola of hornfelsed sedimentary rocks associated with the eastern margin of Crooked Mountain quartz monzonite pluton. The prospect sites are staked over four large ovoid-valley wall color anomalies that appear to be stratiform in character. Previous workers collected highly anomalous stream-sediment samples from below the area of the color anomalies. In 2008, Cougar Gold LLC, an affiliate of Electrum USA Ltd., operator of the Golden Lynx LLC at the time, completed sampling and mapping of the Gold Creek prospects. Mapping located a series of large quartz monzonite to diorite dikes in the headwaters of the streams reporting anomalous gold and pathfinder elements. Large color anomalies noted previously were examined and found to be associated with extensive fracture controlled sulfide development. The most intense sulfide development and fracturing were found to be stratigraphically controlled and associated with distinctive chert and black siltite sections. Weak gold and pathfinder anomalies are associated with these fracture zones. Much of the prospect area is covered with glacial alluvium and talus potentially masking potential mineralized areas within the claim group.

Luna Prospect

The Luna claim group is located in the southern Kuskokwim mountains of southwestern Alaska approximately 100 miles to the southeast of Bethel and 6 miles west of the Kisa prospect. The project area is accessed by helicopter or by small aircraft capable of landing on a tundra dirt strip. The Company staked the property in mid-2007, which consists of 50 state mining claims covering approximately 8,000 acres.

The Luna prospect was discovered during follow-up of an airborne geophysical anomaly identified from proprietary surveys completed in the fall of 2006 and spring of 2007. A regional-scale structural zone was interpreted from the

9

airborne geophysical data. Follow-up exploration involving IP, resistivity and ground magnetic surveys, systematic stream-sediment and rock-chip sampling and geologic mapping led to the discovery.

Follow-up exploration involving IP, resistivity and ground magnetic surveys, systematic stream-sediment and rock-chip sampling and geologic mapping led to the discovery. Over 16 line-miles of IP-resistivity and 40 line-miles of ground magnetics were completed in 2007. The geophysical surveys define a 4.8 miles long by 1.4 miles wide IP and resistivity anomaly coinciding with a ground and aerial magnetic anomaly. Several conductors identified from the airborne electromagnetic surveys correspond with zones of semi-massive sulfide replacement mineralization located on the ground.

A total of 41 stream-sediment samples collected from streams draining the prospect area outline a distinct 10 square mile gold, arsenic, and antimony anomaly. A total of 40 of 72 rock chip samples collected from the prospect area contain anomalous gold. Gold is associated with anomalous arsenic, antimony, bismuth, molybdenum, silver, copper, lead and zinc.

Mineralization is hosted in calcareous siltstones, cherts and tuffaceous sedimentary rocks as well as in porphyritic intrusive rocks. Gold has been found in a broad area that exhibits pervasive fracturing and clay alteration. The prospective area contains ubiquitous disseminated, vein and stockwork sulfide accumulations. Intrusive rocks occur as dikes, sills and small stocks and compositionally include diorites and granodiorites as well as rhyolites. Several zones of stratiform sulfide replacement mineralization with cherty silica alteration containing up to 70% sulfides, primarily fine-grained pyrite, arsenopyrite and stibnite and to a lesser extent chalcopyrite and sphalerite have been located within the claim group.

The presence of widespread base and precious metals anomalies in stream sediments and rocks along this newly located structural zone and the association of these anomalies with intrusive rocks and reactive sedimentary rocks opens up a wide range of opportunities for future discoveries.

On May 8, 2008, the Company signed three separate joint venture agreements with Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (”Newmont”). During the joint venture Newmont conducted rock sampling and mapping on the project in 2008 and confirmed previous sampling results produced by the Company. However on December 12, 2008, the Company received from Newmont a letter that notified of its intent to terminate the three venture agreements effective immediately.

In 2010, work performed by our current joint venture partner, North Fork consisted of rock chip sampling and prospecting. The project area is predominantly covered by a blanket of till, meaning outcrop is limited to where streams incise into the till layer and expose the underlying bedrock. During 2011, North Fork continued with rock chip sampling and prospecting, as well as completed a number of soil sampling traverses in an attempt to define drill targets for testing during 2012. Work performed in 2013 and 2012 was focused mainly on compiling data for a National Instrument 43-101 and permitting for exploration drilling programs.

Kisa Prospect

The Kisa claim group is made up of 38 state mining claims covering approximately 5,840 acres. The mining claims encompass a narrow, linear, northeast trending ridge held up with hornfelsed Jurassic- to Cretaceous-age sedimentary rocks intruded by rhyolite to gabbroic dikes and sills. Several northwest-trending spurs off the main ridge appear to be related to crosscutting dikes of a different age and composition. Geochemical analyses suggest associations similar to those known from other gold deposits within the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt including the producing Fort Knox Mine and advanced exploration projects at Donlin Creek to the north and Shotgun Hills to the east.

During 2007, the Company completed over 3,100 feet of core drilling with encouraging results on one of the main targets of the Kisa claim group, known as the Kisa Breccia Target. A poorly exposed, extensively silica-carbonate-sulfide altered breccia body is located along a ridge crest and steep, north-facing valley walls. The breccia is composed of a mixture of altered sedimentary and igneous clasts, many of which exhibit multiple generations of veining and brecciation. The breccia body is exposed over an area approximately 1000 feet wide x 1600 feet long and roughly 800 feet high. Systematic rock chip samples from outcropping exposures of this breccia average 1.25 parts per million (0.036 troy ounces per short ton) gold. The Company completed six core holes into the target during the 2007 drilling campaign. All six holes cut broad zones of intensely altered igneous breccia containing low grade gold mineralization including narrower higher grade intervals. Hole K07-04 cut 678 feet averaging 0.3 parts per million gold; hole K07-05 cut 378 feet averaging 0.7 parts per million (0.02 ounces per ton) gold, including an intercept of 144 feet averaging 1.3 parts per million (0.038 ounces per ton) and hole K07-06 cut 485 feet averaging 0.4 parts per million (0.012 ounces per ton) gold.

The Golden Dike Target includes the rocks exposed on and under a prominent northeast trending ridgeline running through the center of the Kisa claim group. The ridge contains numerous silica-carbonate-sulfide altered felsic rhyolite dikes and sills exposed over an area 900 feet wide x 9800 feet long with at least 650 feet of exposed vertical extent. Float

10

mapping, aerial photographic linears, airborne geophysical data and soil sampling suggest the dike swarm may extend in both directions under talus covered slopes and into the adjacent valleys. Sedimentary rocks are heavily iron oxide stained and fractured in the hornfelsed zones adjacent to and along the dike and sill margins and contain various oxidation products after sulfides. The dikes are often bleached, silicified and typically contain disseminated to stockwork sulfide veining. The large spatial extent and intense alteration of this dike swarm and the heavily iron-stained host rocks suggest the presence of a mineralized system at the surface and underlying the ridge. The length-weighted average grade sampled from the dike swarm averaged greater than 0.1 parts per million of gold. Similar dikes swarms and alteration zones are associated with the mineralized zones in the Donlin Creek deposit.

Work in 2007 included detailed rock chip and soil sampling, ground and airborne geophysics and geologic mapping. This work has now expanded the target area to a zone approximately 850 feet to 1,500 feet wide x 15,000 feet long with at least 525 feet and locally up to 1,150 feet of exposed vertical extent. Additional soil and rock chip sampling and geologic mapping were completed during the 2008 field season and expanded the areas of known gold mineralization considerably.

The Pirate’s Pick Target is located in the northern portion of the Kisa claim group and consists of a large northwest-trending quartz-carbonate-sulfide veined fault zone. The intensely stockwork-veined fault is intermittently exposed over the crest and flanks of a small ridge in an area roughly 650 feet wide by 1150 feet long with several hundreds of feet of exposed vertical extent. The fault occurs along the northern end of the ridge hosting the dike-sill complex and field evidence suggests the fault may offset and displace the dike swarm. The length-weighted average grade of 18 rock chip samples collected from this zone is 1.95 parts per million (0.057 ounces per ton) gold.

Additional targets occur along the projections of the dike swarm and fault systems into the adjacent talus covered slopes and glacial drift filled valleys, but will require additional work prior to definition of drill targets. Several small rubble crop and/or outcrop showings along the valley edge to the northwest of the main ridge contain anomalous pathfinder element suites and gold values. These showings correspond with a marked airborne magnetic geophysical anomaly identical to that over the main ridge to the southeast and make an intriguing target.

In 2010, work performed by our current joint venture partner, North Fork consisted of re-sampling of the drill core from the previous holes, in storage in Bethel, Alaska. A total of 26 samples were selected from intervals where anomalous Au had been reported. All work performed in 2013 and 2012 related to compiling data for a National Instrument 43-101.

Gold Lake Prospect

The Gold Lake claim group is made up of 69 state mining claims covering approximately 9,720 acres approximately 8 miles west of the Kisa Prospect. The claims cover a broad, bright red, iron oxide stained, northwest trending ridge several miles long and nearly a mile wide adjacent to Gold Lake. The claim group contains at least two generations of crosscutting igneous dikes and sills similar to the Kisa showing and drill targets have been defined at several prospects within the claim package.

The Gossan Ridge Target consists of a series of banded quartz-sulfide veins associated with a dike-sill swarm that runs along the crest and flanks of rust-colored ridgeline exhibiting heavily iron oxide-staining reflecting weathering and oxidation of widespread disseminated sulfides in the rocks exposed along the ridge. The vein system has an exposed strike length of over 1600 feet and exposed widths up to 150 feet and the alteration zone and lower grade old mineralization is up to 350 feet wide and 4900 feet long with up to 650 feet of exposed vertical extent. Samples from the vein system consistently carry highly anomalous gold and pathfinder elements. The vein system appears to be associated with a series of porphyritic dikes that have produced pervasive and intense hydrothermal alteration of the host sedimentary rocks. The dikes and sills typically contain lower grade gold mineralization, but their widespread presence and intense alteration associated with the igneous rocks throughout the complex suggest the presence of a larger, potentially mineralized igneous body at depth.

During 2007, additional rock and soil sampling was completed and the previously outlined soil anomaly was extended to more than 1 kilometer along strike. Over 51 line-miles of ground magnetics were completed and located a distinctive circular magnetic anomaly adjacent to, and overlapping with the main soil and rock chip anomaly. The magnetic feature extends beneath a glacial drift-filled valley and underlies another prominent alteration zone on the adjacent ridge slopes. Prospecting this feature in 2007 confirmed the presence of quartz-arsenopyrite-stibnite veins and fracture-controlled sulfides potentially indicative of cupola-related mineralization above a buried intrusion. A single 3-mile long, induced polarization and resistivity survey line was run adjacent to the main showing and generated a good IP response over the circular ground magnetics feature. A large area of anomalous gold and intense alteration and the numerous dikes suggests the Gold Lake prospect may overlie a larger potentially mineralized intrusive hosted system at depth.

11

During 2008, four drill holes were completed totaling 3,227.5 feet and cut thick intervals of moderately to strongly altered and weakly gold mineralized sediments and intrusives. All the holes bottomed in hornfels indicating proximity to a larger intrusive body at depth which is still untested by drilling. Geologic mapping and soil and rock sampling were completed along favorable trends. Detailed sampling and structural analysis indicates the main mineralized zone, exposed on steep nearly inaccessible cliffs, was not completely tested by the 2008 drilling, in part due to difficulties in establishing a stable drill platform on the steep slopes. Detailed continuous rock chip sampling across the mineralized zone exposed on the cliffs outlined a zone approximately 30 meters true thickness averaging 1 part per million (0.029 ounces per ton)

The Golden Alder Target consists of a linear fault zone exposed along the bottom and valley walls of a small drainage over a strike length of approximately 600 meters. Soils collected over covered areas on the valley walls and adjacent uplands suggests the zone may be as wide as 200 meters. A pronounced circular airborne geophysical anomaly underlies a portion of the fault system and its projection into an alluvium covered area and may represent a leakage halo emanating from a potentially mineralized intrusion at depth over 1.5 parts per million (0.044 ounces per ton) gold. During 2008, additional soil and rock sampling surveys were completed with encouraging results. All work performed in 2013 and 2012 related to compiling data for a National Instrument 43-101.

BUCKSTOCK PROJECT

All the claims held under the Buckstock Project area are currently part of a Master Earn-in Agreement with North Fork. The agreement was finalized and executed on March 28, 2011.

Summary

In southwest Alaska, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Kisa controls another claim block known as the Company’s Buckstock Project. The claims are called the Chilly group and consist of 44 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 7,040 acres. The claims are situated approximately 50 miles southwest of Donlin Creek and 45 miles northeast of Kisa’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area. Kisa initiated an active and aggressive exploration program in the region as part of a regional program approach expanding on the Company’s results in the Project area. These prospects have been identified through multiple sources including a review and compilation of data from published federal, state and academic manuscripts, published and unpublished geochemical data and corporate proprietary data sets.

Over 1,600 stream sediment, heavy mineral concentrate and rock samples cover the area and the claim groups are staked in areas determined to be prospective as potential source areas for the placer occurrences identified from the company’s proprietary geochemical database. Each of these prospects falls within much larger, poorly defined regional-scale geochemical anomalies that represent district-scale exploration plays.

The project area is underlain by sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the Triassic and Cretaceous Gemuk Group; sedimentary rocks of the Cretaceous Kuskokwim Group; and Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary mafic to felsic volcanic rocks, small granitic intrusions, and granite porphyry dikes and sills. Locally there are small accumulations of Quaternary age olivine basalt. The project area lies within a structurally complex flexure zone within a series of crustal-scale wrench faults.

Deformation associated with these faults and splays appears to be at least locally important in the location of both igneous rocks and mineralized showings. Both high level epithermal and deeper-level shallow intrusive and subvolcanic alteration and mineralization systems are present in the project. Initial field follow-up in late 2007 was encouraging with gold showings identified in bedrock on several claim groups.

Chilly Prospect

This prospect consists of a semicircular, 25-square mile multi-element stream geochemical anomaly draining a large Late Cretaceous to Early Tertiary, zoned, quartz monzonitic intrusive complex. Highly anomalous arsenic in stream silts outlines this intrusive complex at the regional scale. Placer gold has been found around the flanks of the complex coincident with highly anomalous stream silts containing pathfinder elements. Seven rock chip samples collected from outcrops in the headwaters of the anomalous streams contain anomalous gold.

On May 8, 2008, the Company signed three separate joint venture agreements with Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (”Newmont”). During the joint venture Newmont completed a systematic rock and soil sampling program on the claims in the summer of 2008 and delineated a large gold in soils anomaly on the claim group. However on December 12, 2008, the Company received from Newmont a letter that notified of its intent to terminate the three venture agreements effective immediately.

12

In 2010, work performed by our current joint venture partner, North Fork consisted of re-sampling of the main soil anomaly and also completed stream sediment sampling surrounding the claim block. During 2011, North Fork planned to complete a detailed helimag survey over the claim block, but this was postponed after several attempts to complete the survey were curtailed by bad weather. Work performed in 2013 and 2012 was focused mainly on compiling data for a National Instrument 43-101 and preliminary data processing of control tie-lines for the helimag survey.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any legal proceedings and are not aware of any such proceedings known to be contemplated.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.  

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

In October 2007, our common stock began quotation on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board (OTCBB) under the symbol “GCMN”. Prior to October 2007 our common stock was quoted on the over the counter market in the Pink Sheets.

The following table sets forth for our common stock, the high and low closing bid quotations per share, taken from the internet, for our common stock for each quarter for the periods indicated. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Year	Quarter	High Closing	Low Closing
2012	First Quarter	$0.04	$0.02
	Second Quarter	$0.04	$0.02
	Third Quarter	$0.05	$0.02
	Fourth Quarter	$0.04	$0.01
2013	First Quarter	$0.03	$0.01
	Second Quarter	$0.04	$0.01
	Third Quarter	$0.03	$0.01
	Fourth Quarter	$0.02	$0.01

Shareholders

As of February 20, 2014, there were approximately 736 shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock as furnished to the Company by its transfer agent and does not account for shares owned through clearing houses.

Dividend Policy

The Company has never paid any dividends and does not anticipate the payment of dividends in the foreseeable future.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent for the Company’s Common Stock is Columbia Stock Transfer Company, 601 E. Seltice Way, Suite 202, Post Falls, Idaho 83854.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

In June 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Gold Crest Stock Plan (the “Plan”) which was approved by shareholders in December 2007. The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of the Company’s business.

The maximum number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the Plan adopted by the Company is currently set at 12,000,000 shares of which 4,000,000 may be granted as Incentive Stock Options to employees. As of December 31, 2013, the remaining number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Stock Plan was 11,450,000.

13

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not issue any new options under the 2007 Stock Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company had 5,280,000 stock options expire with exercise prices ranging from $0.28 to $0.53.  These options had been granted between June 19, 2007 and September 12, 2007 to members of the board of directors, employees and to consultants of the Company.  

The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2013.  Information is included for equity compensation plans not approved by our security holders.

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options		Weighted average excise price of outstanding options			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		-		$	-		n/a
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
2007 Stock Plan		-		$	-		11,350,000	(1)
Total		-		$	-		11,350,000

(1)          The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2007 Stock Plan will not exceed 12,000,000.  There has been 650,000 shares of fully-vested common stock issued under the 2007 stock plan to three directors and one employee leaving 11,350,000 available at December 31, 2013.  

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the company had the following unregistered sales of equity securities:

During the period July 22, 2013 through August 15, 2013 the Company sold 2,500,000 common shares to two accredited investors for a total of $50,000 or $0.02 per share.  The shares were sold pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"),  in a private non-public transaction and deemed restricted securities which may not be publicly resold absent registration under the Act or an exemption from registration.

All shares above were issued without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(2), and Rule 506 promulgated by the SEC, and Section 4(6) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering. Each participant was an accredited investor at the time of the issuance. They delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to the issuance of the shares and consented to the imposition of a restrictive legend upon the certificate representing their shares. They represented that they had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting. They represented that they had been afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the share purchase. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with these transactions.

Dividends

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion contains various statements regarding our current strategies, financial position, results of operations, cash flows, operating and financial trends and uncertainties, as well as certain forward-looking statements regarding our future expectations. When used in this discussion, words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "could," "may," "will," "should," "plan," "predict," "potential," and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Our forward- looking statements are based on our current expectations and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. As such, our actual future results, performance or achievements may differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, our forward-looking statements. Please refer to our "Risk Factors" elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. We assume no future obligation to update our forward-looking statements or to provide periodic updates or guidance.

14

Overview and Plan of Operation

As discussed in “Note 3. Going Concern” to our consolidated financial statements, the Company has had no revenues and incurred an accumulated deficit of $9,708,021 through December 31, 2013. Another factor is that the Company has a negative current ratio of 0.10: 1 at December 31, 2013. The current ratio is a measurement of the degree to which current assets cover current liabilities (current assets/ current liabilities). A high ratio indicates a good probability the enterprise can retire current debts. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to seek additional capital from new equity securities offerings and joint venture agreements that will provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth and fully implement its business plan.

We are in the business of exploration, development, and if warranted the mining of properties containing valuable mineral deposits. We are traded on the over the counter market in the United States and, as is typical with such companies, losses are incurred in the stages of exploration and development, which typically need to be funded through equity or debt financing.

In southwest Alaska, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Kisa controls or has interests in nine claim blocks consisting of 274 State of Alaska mining claims covering 42,280 acres.

On March 28, 2011 the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Kisa, executed a Master Earn-In agreement (“the Agreement”) with North Fork LLC, (“North Fork”) an Alaska limited liability company. This agreement calls for North Fork to explore for gold deposits on Kisa’s claim blocks in the Southwest Kuskokwim Project area and Buckstock Project area (“Projects”). The Projects consist of the Company’s exploration properties mentioned above. See “Note 4. Mineral Properties – North Fork Option Master Earn-in Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

On June 5, 2012, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Kisa signed a Terms Sheet with Afranex Gold Limited (“Afranex”), a company related to our joint venture partners North Fork, which sets out the terms on which Afranex agrees to acquire 100% of the shares in Kisa. On February 13, 2013 an amendment was signed changing certain terms, most notably, changing the initial acquisition of only 80% of the shares of Kisa with an option to acquire the remaining 20% at any time up to June 30, 2015 for additional consideration.  See “Note 4. Mineral Properties – Afranex Term Sheet” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

On July 26, 2012, the Company signed a Loan Facility Agreement (“Loan”) with Afranex for $15,000, and amendment on October 26, 2012 for an additional $10,000 all received before December 31, 2012. On February 13, 2013 another amendment was signed increasing the loan amount from $25,000 to $80,000.  The due date was extended out to June 30, 2013 and then on July 26, 2013, per the third deed of variation to the loan facility agreement, the due date was again extended out to January 31, 2014.  As of the date of this filing, the Company has received the entire $80,000. See “Note 4. Mineral Properties – Afranex Loan Facility Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Board of Directors

Effective November 6, 2013, the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Robert O’Brien as a Director of the Company.  Mr. O’Brien had served as a director of the Company since 2004.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth certain information regarding the components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared with the year ended December 31, 2012. These tables are provided to assist in assessing differences in our overall performance:

15

			The Year Ended
			December 31,		December 31,
			2013		2012		$ Change	% Change
REVENUES		$	-	$	-	$	-	-
OPERATING EXPENSES:
	Mineral lease option & extension income		(30,000)		-		(30,000)	-
	Legal and accounting expenses		35,907		35,995		(88)	-0.2%
	General and administrative		100,038		60,833		39,205	64.4%
	TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		105,945		96,828		9,117	9.4%
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS			(105,945)		(96,828)		(9,117)	9.4%
	Interest income		-		-		-	-
	Gain realized from advances from Gold
	Crown (Note 5)		-		117,659		(117,659)	-
	Interest expense		-		-		-	-
	TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		-		117,659		(117,659)	-
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES		$	(105,945)	$	20,831	$	(126,776)	-608.6%

Overview of Operating Results

Operating Expenses

The increase of $9,117 in operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was primarily a result in financing fees being approximately $33,000 higher in the year ending December 31, 2013 due to increased efforts to raise funds to pursue new projects.  This increase was offset by $30,000 in other income related to the extension of our North Fork Option Agreement in 2013 versus zero in 2012. Other increases and decreases are explained in more detail below in Legal and Accounting and General and Administrative expenses.

Legal and Accounting Expenses

Legal and accounting expenses were $35,907 for the year ended December 31, 2013 versus $35,995 for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a decrease of only $88.  Legal fees were $11,074 in 2013 versus zero in 2012.  The increase was associated to ongoing work performed associated to the preparation of a proxy statement in 2013.  Accounting expenses were $24,833 in 2013 versus $35,995 in 2012 for a decrease of $11,162.  The lower accounting fees in 2013 were mainly due to due diligence associated with the proposed business combination transaction with Gold Crown in 2012. See “Note 5. Advances from Gold Crown” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

General and Administrative

General and Administrative expenses were $100,038 for the year ended December 31, 2013 versus $60,833 for the year ended December 31, 2012 for an increase of $39,205. The primary reason for the increase was a result in financing fees being approximately $33,000 higher in the year ending December 31, 2013 due to increased efforts to raise funds to pursue new projects.  Other increases in 2013 were due to $2,169 in consulting fees related to due diligence in pursuing possible property purchases in 2013 versus zero in 2012.  In 2013 the Company caught up on two years of tax returns resulting in $1,560 higher tax preparation fees in 2013 versus 2012.  The last item contributing to the increase was a slight increase of $1,169 higher employee fees for the year ended December 31, 2013 which were partially a result of increased time involved with pursuing potential mergers throughout the 2013 year.

Gain realized from advances from Gold Crown

The decrease of $117,659 during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was due to the discussions with the principals of Gold Crown terminating, resulting in the $117,659 in advances from Gold Crown under the original LOI (September 7, 2011) being recognized in the statement of operations in 2012 and therefore no longer a contingent liability.  See “Note 5. Advances from Gold Crown” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

16

Overview of Financial Position

At December 31, 2013, Gold Crest had cash of $16,813 and total current liabilities of $168,698. Gold Crest received $30,000 as consideration for a one year extension of our North Fork Option Agreement which was recognized as income during the year ended December 31, 2013.  During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company signed a Loan and amendments thereto with Afranex and received advances in the amount of approximately $25,000.  In 2013 the Company increased the potential advance to $80,000 of which the Company received the entire increased loan proceeds of $55,000 in the third and fourth quarters of 2013 and recorded the funds as a current liability.  See “Note 4. Mineral Properties – Afranex Loan Facility Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have limited capital resources and thus have had to rely upon the sale of equity securities for the cash required for exploration and development purposes, for acquisitions and to fund our administration. Since we do not expect to generate any revenues in the near future, we must continue to rely upon the sale of our equity securities to raise capital. There can be no assurance that financing, whether debt or equity, will always be available to us in the amount required at any particular time or for any period or, if available, that it can be obtained on terms satisfactory to us.

Future Outlook

Based on the current market environment and our low share price it is not likely we will be able to raise enough money through a private placement of our common stock to fully implement our business plan.

We continue to proceed with our joint venture partner, North Fork, who continues to expend funds under the master earn-in agreement and just completed another season of exploration in the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area.

We are currently also working towards an agreement with Afranex for them to acquire up to 100% of the shares in Kisa which will bring in capital related to the transaction, of which we have received advances on.  See “Note 4. Mineral Properties – Afranex Term Sheet and Afranex Loan Facility Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Changes in Accounting Policies

We did not change our accounting policies during fiscal 2013 or 2012.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.

17

ITEM 8.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	19
Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012	20
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and for the period from inception, January 11, 2005 to December 31, 2013	21
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2013,  2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and from inception, January 11, 2005 to December 31, 2013	22
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and for the period from inception January 11, 2005 to December 31, 2013	25
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	26

18

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Gold Crest Mines, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from inception (January 11, 2005) to December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gold Crest Mines, Inc. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from inception (January 11, 2005) to December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has no revenue, an accumulated deficit, and a negative current ratio that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S.

DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S.

Spokane, Washington

April 1, 2014

19

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
						December 31,		December 31,
						2013		2012
ASSETS
	CURRENT ASSETS
		Cash and cash equivalents			$	16,813	$	1,552
				Total Current Assets		16,813		1,552
	Mineral properties					11,373		11,373
		TOTAL ASSETS			$	28,186	$	12,925
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
	CURRENT LIABILITIES
		Accounts payable			$	19,051	$	26,713
		Accrued liabilities				69,434		47,366
		Loan from Afranex (Note 4)				80,213		25,213
				Total Current Liabilities		168,698		99,292
		Total Liabilities				168,698		99,292
	Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4 and 11)
	STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
		Preferred stock; no par value; 10,000,000 shares
			authorized, none issued or outstanding			-		-
		Common stock; $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares
			authorized; 91,805,828 and 89,205,828 shares issued
			and outstanding, respectively			91,806		89,206
		Additional paid-in capital				9,475,703		9,426,503
		Accumulated deficit during exploration stage				(9,708,021)		(9,602,076)
				Total Stockholders' Deficit		(140,512)		(86,367)
		TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT			$	28,186	$	12,925
	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

20

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
								From Inception
								January 11, 2005
				Years Ended				to
				December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
				2013		2012		2013
REVENUES			$	-	$	-	$	-
OPERATING EXPENSES:
	Exploration expenditures			-		-		4,352,387
	Settlement of drilling contract			-		-		161,813
	Abandonment of mineral lease			-		-		83,600
	Gain on sale of mineral lease			-		-		(16,875)
	Mineral lease option and extension income			(30,000)		-		(60,000)
	Impairment of mineral properties and
	royalty interest			-		-		616,875
	Impairment of investment in Golden Lynx LLC			-		-		43,202
	Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment			-		-		16,738
	Legal and accounting expenses			35,907		35,995		652,487
	Directors' fees			-		-		846,000
	General and administrative			100,038		60,833		3,235,594
	TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES			105,945		96,828		9,931,821
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS				(105,945)		(96,828)		(9,931,821)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
	Interest income			-		-		79,182
	Gain realized from advances from Gold Crown          .    (Note 5)			-		117,659		117,659
	Interest expense			-		-		(22,560)
	Gain  on settlement of accounts payable			-		-		49,519
	TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)			-		117,659		223,800
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES				(105,945)		20,831		(9,708,021)
INCOME TAXES				-		-		-
NET INCOME (LOSS)			$	(105,945)	$	20,831	$	(9,708,021)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC
		AND DILUTED	$	Nil	$	Nil
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
	OF SHARES OUTSTANDING
	BASIC  AND DILUTED			90,309,390		89,205,828
	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

21

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
					Accumulated
					Deficit
	Common Stock		Additional	Common	During
			Paid-in	Stock	Exploration
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Subscribed	Stage	Total
Balances, January 11, 2005 and
December 31, 2005	-	$           -	$              -	$              -	$                -	$              -
Issuance of Common Stock:
for cash, pre-merger
at $0.004 per share	37,500,000	37,500	112,500	-	-	150,000
In connection with reverse
merger (Note 1)	14,600,100	14,600	(7,144)	-	-	7,456
for cash, post-merger
at $0.30 per share	10,797,062	10,797	2,887,910	-	-	2,898,707
for interest at $0.30 per share	41,667	42	12,458	-	-	12,500
for share-based compensation
at $0.59 and $0.63 per share	1,800,000	1,800	1,064,200	-	-	1,066,000
Stock options granted
at $0.30 per share	-	-	72,000	-	-	72,000
Net loss for year ended
December 31, 2006	-	-	-	-	(1,845,103)	(1,845,103)
Balances, December 31, 2006	64,738,829	$  64,739	$  4,141,924	$             -	$  (1,845,103)	$   2,361,560
Issuance of Common Stock:
for directors fees between
$0.53 and $0.54 per share	400,000	400	213,600	-	-	214,000
for share-based compensation
at $0.28 per share	50,000	50	13,950	-	-	14,000
for cash at $0.30 per share	7,529,999	7,530	2,251,470	-	-	2,259,000
for brokerage fees	-	-	(77,335)	-	-	(77,335)
for cash at $0.20 per share
with warrants attached	4,035,000	4,035	802,965	-	-	807,000
for common stock issuable
at $0.20 per share with
warrants attached	662,500	663	131,837	-	-	132,500
for common stock subscribed	-	-	-	(132,500)	-	(132,500)
Stock options granted
at $0.28 and $0.53 per share	-	-	1,032,772	-	-	1,032,772
Net Loss for the year ended
December 31, 2007	-	-	-	-	(5,602,077)	(5,602,077)
Balances, December 31, 2007	77,416,328	$    77,417	$   8,511,183	$    (132,500)	$   (7,447,180)	$  1,008,920
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

22

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
(Continued)
					Accumulated
	Common Stock		Additional	Common	Deficit During
			Paid-in	Stock	Exploration
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Subscribed	Stage	Total
Balances, December 31, 2007	77,416,328	$    77,417	$   8,511,183	$   (132,500)	$   (7,447,180)	$  1,008,920
Stock warrants:
Exercised at $0.30 per share	300,000	300	89,700	-	-	90,000
Stock options:
for share-based compensation
at $0.28 per share	-	-	121,089	-	-	121,089
Issuance of Common Stock:
for directors fees at
$0.10 per share	400,000	400	39,600	-	-	40,000
for services at $0.10 per share	100,000	100	9,900	-	-	10,000
for cash ranging from $0.05
to $0.15 per share	5,666,667	5,666	594,334	-	-	600,000
for common stock subscribed	-	-	-	111,300	-	111,300
Forgiveness of remaining
common stock subscribed	(106,000)	(106)	(21,094)	21,200	-	-
Net loss for year ended
December 31, 2008	-	-	-	-	(1,898,724)	(1,898,724)
Balances, December 31, 2008	83,776,995	$    83,777	$   9,344,712	$               -	$   (9,345,904)	$        82,585
Stock options:
for share-based compensation
at $0.28 per share	-	-	13,355	-	-	13,355
Issuance of Common Stock:
for cash at $0.01 per share	1,000,000	1,000	9,000	-	-	10,000
for cash at $0.03 per share	928,833	929	26,936	-	-	27,865
Net loss for year ended
December 31, 2009	-	-	-	-	(171,515)	(171,515)
Balances, December 31, 2009	85,705,828	$    85,706	$   9,394,003	$               -	$   (9,517,419)	$     (37,710)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

23

	GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
	(An Exploration Stage Company)
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
	(Continued)
					Accumulated
		Common Stock		Additional	Deficit During
				Paid-in	Exploration
		Shares	Amount	Capital	Stage	Total
Balances, December 31, 2009		85,705,828	$    85,706	$   9,394,003	$   (9,517,419)	$     (37,710)
Issuance of Common Stock:
for cash at $0.01 per share		2,500,000	2,500	22,500	-	25,000
Net loss for year ended
December 31, 2010		-	-	-	(34,450)	(34,450)
Balances, December 31, 2010		88,205,828	$    88,206	$   9,416,503	$   (9,551,869)	$     (47,160)
Issuance of Common Stock:
for directors fees at
$0.02 per share		100,000	100	1,900	-	2,000
for cash at $0.01 per share		900,000	900	8,100	-	9,000
Net loss for year ended
December 31, 2011		-	-	-	(71,038)	(71,038)
Balances, December 31, 2011		89,205,828	$    89,206	$   9,426,503	$   (9,622,907)	$   (107,198)
Net Income for year ended
December 31, 2012		-	-	-	20,831	20,831
Balances, December 31, 2012		89,205,828	$    89,206	$   9,426,503	$   (9,602,076)	$   (86,367)
Stock issued:
for share-based compensation
at $0.018 per share		100,000	100	1,700	-	1,800
Issuance of Common Stock:
for cash at $0.02 per share		2,500,000	2,500	47,500	-	50,000
Net Loss for year ended
December 31, 2013		-	-	-	(105,945)	(105,945)
Balances, December 31, 2013		91,805,828	$    91,806	$   9,475,703	$   (9,708,021)	$   (140,512)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

24

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
				Year Ended		Year Ended		From Inception
				December 31,		December 31,		January 11, 2005 to
				2013		2012		December 31, 2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net income (loss)		$	(105,945)	$	20,831	$	(9,708,021)
	Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used
	by operating activities:
		Depreciation		-		159		53,193
		Common stock and options issued for services		-		-		1,368,976
		Equity compensation for management and directors		1,800		-		1,218,041
		Interest paid with common shares		-		-		12,500
		Settlement of drilling contract		-		-		161,813
		Gain recognized on equipment exchanged in settlement
		of accounts payable		-		-		(3,421)
		Loss on disposal of equipment		-		-		16,738
		Abandonment of mineral lease		-		-		83,600
		Impairment of mineral properties and royalty interest		-		-		616,875
		Gain realized from advances from Gold Crown (Note 5)		-		(117,659)		(117,659)
		Impairment of investment in Golden Lynx LLC		-		-		43,202
		Gain on sale of mineral properties		-		-		(16,875)
		Gain on settlement of accounts payable		-		-		(49,519)
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Interest receivable		-		-		(6,266)
		Prepaid expenses and deposits		-		-		57,999
		Miscellaneous receivable		-		-		3,000
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		14,406		48,841		167,833
		Advances from Gold Crown (Note 5)		-		-		117,659
		Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		(89,739)		(47,828)		(5,980,332)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Cash received in reverse merger			-		-		7,456
	Note receivable issued			-		-		(200,000)
	Purchase of royalty interest in mineral property			-		-		(400,000)
	Purchase of mineral properties			-		-		(388,175)
	Proceeds from the sale of equipment			-		-		22,979
	Proceeds from the sale of mineral properties			-		-		50,000
	Purchase of equipment			-		-		(134,971)
		Net cash used by investing activities		-		-		(1,042,711)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Borrowings under line of credit			-		-		250,000
	Payments on line of credit			-		-		(250,000)
	Proceeds from the issuance of stock on the exercise of warrants			-		-		201,300
	Sale of common stock, net of issuance costs			50,000		-		6,758,343
	Loan from Afranex (Note 4)			55,000		25,213		80,213
		Net cash provided by financing activities		105,000		25,213		7,039,856
	Net change in cash and cash equivalents			15,261		(22,615)		16,813
	Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			1,552		24,167		-
	Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	16,813	$	1,552	$	16,813
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Interest paid		$	-	$	-	$	2,273
	Taxes paid			-		-		-
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
	Land contributed in exchange for investment in Golden Lynx LLC		$	-	$	-	$	54,575
	Land held in Golden Lynx LLC returned as mineral properties			-		-		11,373
	Note receivable forgiven in connection with settlement agreement			-		-		120,000
	Equipment relinquished in connection with settlement agreement			-		-		12,654
	Equipment exchanged for settlement of accounts payable			-		-		29,828
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

25

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1.  Organization and Description of Business

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Gold Crest” and “the Company”) is a Nevada corporation originally incorporated on August 20, 1968, as Silver Crest Mines, Inc., an Idaho corporation.

On August 1, 2006, Gold Crest acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Niagara Mining and Development Co., (“Niagara”), an Idaho corporation formed on January 11, 2005, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. (“Kisa”), an Alaskan corporation formed on July 28, 2006. Gold Crest’s sole asset on the merger date was cash of $7,456, which was accounted for as being acquired by Niagara in exchange for 14,600,100 common shares of Niagara. Niagara’s sole asset on the merger date was cash of $150,000 and its wholly owned subsidiary Kisa. Neither company had liabilities on the date of the merger. This transaction has been treated as a reverse merger, effectively as if Niagara had issued shares for consideration equal to the net monetary assets of Gold Crest. Under reverse acquisition accounting, the consolidated financial statements of the entity are considered a continuation of the financial statements of Niagara, the accounting acquirer. On June 20, 2008, 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Kisa were transferred from Niagara to the Company.

The Company is in the business of exploration, development, and if warranted the mining of properties containing valuable mineral deposits. The focus of the Company’s exploration programs is directed at precious metals, primarily gold.

NOTE 2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Consolidation of Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts and the accounts of wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Highly liquid short-term investments with a remaining maturity when purchased of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents. The Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents in high quality financial institutions.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in those statements and accompanying notes. Examples of areas requiring the use of estimates include the recoverability of mineral property and investments accounted for on the cost basis, assumptions used in determining the fair value of stock-based compensation and the expected economic lives and rates for depreciation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Exploration Stage Enterprise

The Company's financial statements are prepared pursuant to the accounting principles for development stage enterprises as it devotes substantially all of its efforts to acquiring and exploring mining interests that will eventually provide sufficient net profits to sustain the Company’s existence. Until such interests are engaged in major commercial production, the Company will continue to prepare its financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with entities in the development stage. Mining companies subject to development stage financial statement presentation are required to label their financial statements as an “Exploration Stage Company,” pursuant to guidance provided by SEC Guide 7 for Mining Companies.

26

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Mine Exploration and Development Costs

All exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mine development costs are capitalized after proven and probable reserves have been identified. Amortization is calculated using the units-of-production method over the expected life of the operation based on the estimated recoverable mineral ounces.

Mineral Properties

Significant payments related to the acquisition of mineral properties, mineral rights, and mineral leases are capitalized. If a commercially mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when production begins using the units-of-production method based on proven and probable reserves. If no commercially mineable ore body is discovered, or such rights are otherwise determined to have no value, such costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined the property has no future economic value.

Property Evaluations

Management of the Company periodically reviews the net carrying value of its properties on a property-by-property basis. These reviews consider the net realizable value of each property to determine whether a permanent impairment in value has occurred and the need for any asset write-down. An impairment loss will be recognized when the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to result from the use of an asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset. Measurement of an impairment loss will be based on the estimated fair value of the asset if the asset is expected to be held and used.

Although management will make its best estimate of the factors that affect net realizable value based on current conditions, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term which could adversely affect management's estimate of net cash flows expected to be generated from its assets, and necessitate asset impairment write-downs.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value Accounting

Accounting guidance has established a hierarchy of assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The three levels included in the hierarchy are:

·

Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

·

Level 2: significant other observable inputs

·

Level 3: significant unobservable inputs

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has no assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost is recognized when the event occurs. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted. For stock awards that do not vest immediately, the Company recognizes the compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period.

27

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net income (loss) per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share for the Company is the same as basic net income (loss) per share, as the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no outstanding common stock equivalents.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes will be actually paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the deferred tax assets, if there is uncertainty regarding their realization.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated using the straight line method over five to seven years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Betterments of a major nature are capitalized. When assets are retired or sold, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

Reclamation and Remediation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations)

The Company had no operating properties at December 31, 2013 and 2012, but the Company’s mineral properties will be subject to standards for mine reclamation that have been established by various governmental agencies. For these non-operating properties, the Company accrues costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when it is probable that such costs will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to their present value. Such costs are based on management's current estimate of amounts that are expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed within current laws and regulations.

It is reasonably possible that due to uncertainties associated with defining the nature and extent of environmental contamination, application of laws and regulations by regulatory authorities, and changes in remediation technology, the ultimate cost of remediation and reclamation could change in the future. The Company continually reviews its accrued liabilities for such remediation and reclamation costs as evidence becomes available indicating that its remediation and reclamation liability has changed.

For operating properties the Company will recognize the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs will be capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the associated long-lived assets and depreciated over the lives of the assets on a units-of-production basis. Reclamation costs will be accreted over the life of the related assets and are adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate on the underlying obligation.

NOTE 3. Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has had no revenues and incurred an accumulated deficit of $9,708,021 through December 31, 2013. Another factor is that the Company has a negative current ratio of 0.10: 1 at December 31, 2013. The current ratio is a measurement of the degree to which current assets cover current liabilities (current assets/ current liabilities). A high ratio indicates a good probability the enterprise can retire current debts. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to seek additional capital from new equity securities offerings and joint venture agreements that will provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth and fully implement its business plan.

28

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

Should the Company be unable to raise capital through future private placements, its business, and, as a result, its financial position, results of operations and cash flow will likely be materially adversely impacted. As such, substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern remains as of the date of these financial statements.

The Company believes it will only need an estimated $150,000 to $200,000 to continue operations through the next twelve months. The timing and amount of capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including the Company’s ability to successfully maintain a joint venture on our Alaska properties and the Company’s future personnel requirements.

NOTE 4.  Mineral Properties

In Alaska, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Kisa controls or has interests in five claim blocks consisting of 274 State of Alaska mining claims covering 42,280 acres. Four of the claim blocks making up 35,240 acres comprise the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project and the remaining claim group consisting of 7,040 acres is the Company’s Buckstock Project. The Southwest Kuskokwim claim blocks are located in southwest Alaska approximately 90 miles east of the village of Bethel on State of Alaska-owned lands. The Buckstock claim group is located approximately 30-80 miles south of the Donlin Creek deposit and north of the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim claim groups.

The following is a summary of the Company’s mineral properties in Alaska:

Alaska Mineral Properties	Number of Claims	Acres	Carrying Value at       December 31, 2013	Carrying Value at December 31,    2012
Southwest Kuskokwim Project
AKO	73	11,680	$               2,543	$           2,543
Luna	50	8,000	-	-
Kisa	38	5,840	3,314	3,314
Gold Lake	69	9,720	5,516	5,516
TOTAL Southwest Kuskokwim Project	230	35,240	11,373	11,373
Buckstock Project
Chilly	44	7,040	-	-
TOTAL Buckstock Project	44	7,040	-	-
OVERALL TOTAL	274	42,280	$           11,373	$         11,373

In Alaska, the lands are held under and are subject to the State’s mining laws and regulations. The Company is required to perform certain work commitments and pay annual assessments to the State of Alaska to hold these claims in good standing. The annual work commitment and annual fees were fulfilled and all necessary fees and filings have been made for the season ended September 30, 2013. The commitments and annual assessments for 2014 will be due no later than November 30, 2014. See “Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies”.

North Fork Option Master Earn-in Agreement

On January 27, 2010, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Kisa signed an option agreement with North Fork Resources Pty Ltd (“North Fork”) which grants North Fork an exclusive option to purchase and/or earn an interest in the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area (“The Projects”).

Under the terms of the option and amendments thereto, North Fork made payments to the Company totaling $30,000 in 2010 for the exclusive right to explore the claims up until October 31, 2010. On October 18, 2010 North Fork formally notified the Company of their intent to exercise the option over the Alaska properties.  The total of the two payments of $30,000 received from North Fork was recognized as income during the year ended December 31, 2010.

29

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

On March 28, 2011 the Master Earn-In agreement (“the Agreement”) with North Fork was executed which maintained the same terms as the originals terms.

On October 28, 2013, the Company and North Fork agreed to an extension on the first earn-in date from October 31, 2013 to October 31, 2014, this extension was later memorialized in an executed amendment dated February 12, 2014.  As consideration for the one year extension, North Fork made a one-time extension payment to the Company in the amount of $30,000 which was recognized as income during the year ended December 31, 2013.

The following is a breakdown of the proposed earn-in terms, as amended:

1.

The initial interest at the time North Fork exercises its option to earn into The Projects will be as follows:

a.

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. – 100%

b.

North Fork – 0%

2.

North Fork can earn a 51% interest in The Projects by the expenditure of $3,000,000 on The Projects by October 31, 2014.

3.

If North Fork withdraws from the Joint Venture prior to earning a 51% interest in The Projects, it will have no further interest in The Projects.

4.

North Fork can earn an additional 24% interest in The Projects, taking its total interest to 75% by the expenditure of an additional $3,000,000 by October 31, 2016.

5.

North Fork can earn a total interest of 90% in any of The Projects claim blocks by the completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study.

6.

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. will retain a free carried 10% interest in The Projects up to a Decision to Mine at which point it can elect to contribute at 10% or dilute to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty.

7.

North Fork is obliged to keep The Projects in good standing.

8.

North Fork is the sole manager of The Projects and will make all decisions in regards to the exploration programs.

Afranex Terms Sheet

On June 5, 2012, and later amended on August 28, 2012 and February 13, 2013, the Company signed a Terms Sheet with Afranex, a company related to the Company’s joint venture partner North Fork. On February 26, 2013, and later amended on March 26, 2013 and again on June 5, 2013,  the Company executed a new version of the Terms Sheet with Afranex wherein Afranex proposed to purchase up to 100% of Kisa, Gold Crest’s wholly owned subsidiary, in one of two proposed options.  The Kisa common shares represent 100% ownership of the capital stock of Kisa.  

Kisa’s only assets include the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project and the Buckstock Project areas which consist of exploration properties in southwest Alaska comprised of 42,280 acres of State of Alaska-owned lands.

One option is if the Company sells 100% of its ownership interest in Kisa to Afranex, Afranex would pay Gold Crest 12,500,000 shares of Afranex stock valued at AUD$0.20 per share and grant Gold Crest an Afranex ordinary share 4-year option to purchase 3,125,000 shares exercisable at AUD$0.25 per share.

Alternatively, if the Company sells 80% of its Kisa shares to Afranex, Afranex would pay Gold Crest 10,000,000 ordinary shares of Afranex stock valued at AUD$0.20 per share and grant Afranex an option to purchase the remaining 20% of the Kisa shares in consideration for Afranex ordinary shares valued at $500,000, on or before June 30, 2015.  Gold Crest would be granted a 4-year option to purchase 2,500,000 ordinary Afranex shares at a price of AUD$0.25 per share.

The following is a breakdown of the main details of the Terms Sheet, which incorporates the final amendments to the terms sheet:

1.

Consideration:

a.

Afranex agrees to pay Gold Crest the sum of $100,000 (of which $25,000 was advanced to Gold Crest from Afranex as of December 31, 2012 and a total of $80,000 as of December 31, 2013, and

30

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

b.

One option is if the Company sells 80% of its ownership interest in Kisa to Afranex, Afranex would issue Gold Crest 10,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares in the capital of Afranex at an issue price of AUD$0.20 per share, or that number of shares depending on the way Afranex decides to become an ASX-listed company (Consideration Shares) and grant Gold Crest 2,500,000 unlisted options to be issued fully paid, ordinary shares in Afranex, exercisable at AUD$0.25 per option and expiring four years from the date of grant.

c.

The alternative option would be if the Company sells 100% of its ownership interest in Kisa to Afranex, Afranex would pay Gold Crest 12,500,000 shares of Afranex stock valued at AUD$0.20 per share and grant Gold Crest an Afranex ordinary share 4-year option to purchase 3,125,000 shares exercisable at AUD$0.25 per share.

2.

Completion of the Acquisition is conditional on the satisfaction (or waiver by the parties) of the certain conditions precedent such as due diligence by Afranex on Kisa, the approval of the board of Afranex as well as the approval of the shareholders of Gold Crest among other conditions.  If these conditions are not satisfied or waived by January 31, 2014, this term sheet agreement will expire. See “Note 12. Subsequent Events – Afranex Terms Sheet Extension” for further details.

3.

Settlement of the Acquisition will occur on that date which is five business days of satisfaction (or waiver) of the conditions precedent.  At settlement of (b) or (c), Afranex will settle the consideration set forth above and Gold Crest will deliver the respective number of Kisa shares.  In the event the Company only sells Afranex 80% of the Kisa shares, Gold Crest agrees that an incorporated joint venture is created between Afranex or Parent and Gold Crest in relation to Kisa on the terms and conditions of the joint venture, which, upon the commencement date, the initial shareholding interests in Kisa will be 80% Afranex and 20% Gold Crest.

4.

If Gold Crest sells 80% of Kisa to Afranex, Afranex may, by written notice to Gold Crest at any time up to June 30, 2015, elect to acquire all (and not part) of Gold Crest’s remaining fully paid Kisa shares in return for the issue of AUD$500,000 worth of Afranex fully paid, ordinary shares if by IPO, or parent shares if Backdoor Listed, which is a corporate finance term that has the same meaning as reverse merger, reverse listing or reverse IPO.

5.

Notwithstanding the fact that this Terms Sheet is legally binding on the Parties, Afranex and Gold Crest agree to enter into a formal share sale and purchase agreement to more fully document the terms of the Acquisition (to be prepared by Afranex’s solicitors) which shall be on terms acceptable to Kisa and Afranex (acting reasonably) and which shall be consistent with the terms set out in the Terms Sheet.

Afranex Loan Facility Agreement

On July 26, 2012, the Company signed a Loan Facility Agreement (“Loan”) in the amount of $15,000 with Afranex which entitled the Company to make individual draw downs in $5,000 increments of the Loan until the Loan has been exhausted to provide the Company with immediate working capital requirements.   On October 26, 2012, the Company signed a first deed of variation to the Loan which increased the Loan amount from $15,000 to $25,000.   

On February 13, 2013, the Company signed a second deed of variation to the Loan which increased the Loan amount from $25,000 to $80,000.   The due date was also extended out to June 30, 2013.  As of December 31, 2013, the Company had received the entire $80,000 and recorded the funds as a current liability.  The funds are intended to be deducted from the $100,000 consideration per the Afranex terms sheet which subsequently was extended out to January 31, 2014 and on July 26, 2013, per the Third deed of variation to the loan facility agreement, the current liability of $80,000 has been extended out to January 31, 2014 also. See “Afranex Terms sheet” above and “Note 12. Subsequent Events – Afranex Loan Facility Agreement Extension” for further details.

NOTE 5.  Advances from Gold Crown

On September 7, 2011, the Company executed a non-binding letter of intent (“LOI”) to enter into a business combination transaction with Gold Crown, Inc (“Gold Crown”).  On October 17, 2011, in connection with the proposed business combination, affiliates of Gold Crown made a non-refundable $117,659 advance to the Company. The funds were used for the following:

31

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

·

to settle outstanding accounts payable for past services that totaled $63,019 for a settlement amount of only $13,500 resulting in a gain on the settlement of accounts payable in the amount of $49,519,

·

engage professionals to conduct due diligence, and

·

initiate procedures and actions with a view toward entering into a definitive business combination agreement.

The Company recorded the advances as a current liability in 2011 as management believed that while no explicit agreement existed requiring the Company to return the advances if a business combination did not take place, there may be an implied obligation for the Company to perform certain actions and activities in connection with the ultimate determination of whether or not a business combination will take place.  

The LOI had a sixty (60) day no shop clause from the date of the LOI.  The LOI also indicated that within sixty (60) days of the signing of the LOI, the Company and Gold Crown would negotiate and execute a definitive Exchange agreement and related documents and certificates which would have incorporated in more complete detail, the terms from the original LOI.  Subsequently, the sixty (60) days passed without entering into a more definitive Exchange agreement.  The Company is no longer obligated to the LOI and is free to pursue other options that would benefit the Company.  

At this time, the Company has terminated any further discussions with the principals of Gold Crown, but has left open the very remote possibility that Gold Crown would present the following items for renewed discussions:

·

audited financial statements by a PCAOB qualified audit firm

·

complete updated mine engineering and geological reports on Gold Crown’s properties

·

verify that adequate financing is in place

·

verify that a qualified slate of officers and directors have been retained

·

prepare a professional five year projection with verifiable numbers in regard to future production amounts, revenue costs, expenses, annual tonnage of ore to be mined and milled, etc.

If the Gold Crown personnel supplied the aforementioned documents, the board of directors of Gold Crest may then review and evaluate such a proposal.  However, Gold Crest is actively pursuing other potential merger candidates.  Since discussions with the principals of Gold Crown have terminated, the $117,659 in advances from Gold Crown under the original LOI have been recognized in the statement of operations in 2012 and is therefore no longer a liability.

NOTE 6.  Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of its common stock. All shares of common stock are equal to each other with respect to voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights. Owners of shares are entitled to one vote for each share owned at any Shareholders’ meeting. The common stock of the Company does not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than fifty percent (50%) of the shares voting in an election of directors may elect all of the directors if they choose to do so.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company had the following issuances of common stock:

On March 1, 2013, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to an officer and director valued at $1,800.  

On July 22, 2013 the Company began a private placement offering up to a maximum of 2,500,000 shares at $0.02 per share for a maximum of $50,000 in proceeds.  The offering scheduled ended on August 15, 2013 and as of that date the Company had issued the full 2,500,000 shares raising a total of $50,000.  The shares were being offered and sold by officers and directors of the Company who received no remuneration for the sale of the shares.

There were no issuances of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Common Stock Warrants

There was no warrant activity during 2013 and no warrants were outstanding at December 31, 2013 or 2012.

32

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 7.  Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is entitled to preference over the common stock with respect to the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, or in the event of any other distribution of assets of the Company among its shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs. The authorized but un-issued shares of Preferred Stock may be divided into and issued in designated series from time to time by one or more resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors. The Directors in their sole discretion have the power to determine the preferences, limitations, and relative rights of each series of Preferred Stock within the limits set forth in the Nevada Business Corporation Act. At December 31, 2013, no preferred stock has been issued.

NOTE 8.  Stock Based Compensation

Stock Based Compensation Plans

In June 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Gold Crest Stock Plan (the “Plan”) which was approved by shareholders in December 2007. The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of the Company’s business.

The maximum number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the Plan adopted by the Company is currently set at 12,000,000 shares of which 4,000,000 may be granted as Incentive Stock Options to employees. As of December 31, 2013, the remaining number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Stock Plan was 11,350,000.

Stock Options

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not issue any new options under the 2007 Stock Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company had 5,280,000 stock options expire with exercise prices ranging from $0.28 to $0.53.  These options had been granted between June 19, 2007 and September 12, 2007 to members of the board of directors, employees and to consultants of the Company.

The following is a summary of stock option activity from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013:

	Number of Shares Under Options	Weighted Average  Exercise Price
Outstanding January 1, 2012	5,280,000	$                      0.52
Granted	—	—
Exercised	—	—
Forfeited	—	—
Expired	(5,280,000)	0.52
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2012	—	$                         —
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013	—	$                         —

NOTE 9.  Income Taxes

The Company did not recognize a provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had deferred tax assets principally arising from the net operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes multiplied by an expected rate of 34%.  For the periods presented, the effective income tax rate differed from the expected rate because of the effects of changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. Changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 relate only to corresponding changes in deferred tax assets for those periods. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has be established at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The significant components of the deferred tax asset at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

33

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Deferred tax asset
Net operating loss carry forward	$	1,974,928	$	1,836,350
Exploration costs and other		311,462		414,019
		2,286,390		2,250,369
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		(2,286,390)		(2,250,369)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—	$	—

At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $5,808,613 and $5,401,030 respectively, which expire in the years 2024 through 2033.

The Company has analyzed its filing positions in all jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns and found no positions that would require a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits to be recognized.

We have determined that we are subject to examination of our income tax filings in the United States and state jurisdictions for the 2011 through 2013 tax years. In the event that the Company is assessed penalties and or interest, penalties will be charged to other operating expense and interest will be charged to interest expense.

NOTE 10.  Related Party Transactions

There were no related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

NOTE 11.  Commitments and Contingencies

Alaska Mineral Property Rent and Assessment Work Commitments

In Alaska, land holdings consist of state mining claims and prospecting sites totaling 42,280 acres of land. Annual rental payments in the approximate amount of $75,000 for these claims are due by November 30, 2014. If these rental payments are not paid by the due date, the claims will be considered abandoned. The annual rental payments that were due on November 30, 2013 were paid in full by the Company’s joint venture partner.

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water requires that upon the prospecting, and the discovery of a locatable mineral and the staking of mineral location, annual labor must be performed on the location each labor year in further development of the locatable mineral so that it can be mined. The labor year for the claims begins on September 1 and ends the following September 1. The Company or its joint venture partner, if applicable, will be required to perform qualified labor in the approximate amount of $110,000 by September 1, 2013 with the possibility, depending on any qualified carry-over amounts that can be applied to the labor year ending September 1, 2014 on certain claim groups, will need to be performed by the September 1, 2013 deadline. If these labor requirements are not met by the due date, the claims will be considered abandoned. The annual work commitments and annual fees were fulfilled and all necessary fees and filings were made by the Company’s joint venture partner for the season ending September 30, 2013. The commitments and annual assessments for 2014 will be due no later than November 30, 2014.

NOTE 12.  Subsequent Events

Afranex Terms Sheet Extension

On January 30, 2014, the Company agreed to an extension to the Terms Sheet between the Company and Afranex.  The new extension agreement extends the expiration date of the Terms Sheet with Afanex from January 31, 2014 to March 31, 2014.  On March 24, 2014, it was then agreed by mutual consent, that the Terms Sheet expiration date be extended again out until June 30, 2014

Afranex Loan Facility Agreement Extension

On January 30, 2014, the Company agreed to extend the due date of the Afranex Loan Facility from January 31, 2014 to March 31, 2014.  The intent was to keep the terms along the same line as the Terms Sheet Extension above.

34

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, including controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us is accumulated and communicated to our management (including our CEO and CFO), were effective as of December 31, 2013, in ensuring them in a timely manner that material information required to be disclosed in this report has been properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud that could occur. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Based on our assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective, as of the end of the fiscal year, for a company of our size, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting

35

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table provides the names, positions and ages of our directors and officers:

Name	Age	Position
Terrence J. Dunne(1)	65	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Daniel R. McKinney Sr.	64	Director
Gordon F. Lee	63	Director
Matthew J. Colbert	45	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary/Treasurer and Director

_____________________

(1)

Member of the Audit Committee

Effective November 6, 2013, the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Robert O’Brien as a Director of the Company.  Mr. O’Brien had served as a director of the Company since 2004.

We have no knowledge of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in our control. We are not, to the best of our knowledge, directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or foreign government.

Terrence J. Dunne.  Mr. Dunne was appointed President of the Company on December 16, 2009. More recently, Mr. Dunne was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Dunne has served as a director of the Company since 2005 and up until December 16, 2009 he had also served as the Company’s Secretary/Treasurer. For more than the past ten years Mr. Dunne has operated Terrence J. Dunne & Associates, a sole proprietorship which provides bookkeeping, income tax return preparation and business consulting services for small businesses. Mr. Dunne is a business consultant, primarily focused on business acquisitions and corporate reorganizations. Mr. Dunne received a degree in Business Administration from Gonzaga University in 1970. He received his Masters Degree in Business Administration in 1975 from Gonzaga University. In addition, he received a Masters Degree in Taxation from Gonzaga University in 1984.  Mr. Dunne is a former adjunct professor in the School of Business Administration of Gonzaga University, teaching courses in corporate mergers, acquisitions and reorganizations. Mr. Dunne is currently serving as a director Cardinal Energy Group which trades on the OTCBB.  Mr. Dunne also serves as a director of a privately held company called Blue Arch Resources. Mr. Dunne is a member of the Audit Committee

Daniel R. McKinney, Sr.  Mr. McKinney joined Gold Crest Mines, Inc. as a Director in April of 2008. Mr. McKinney has been a real estate broker for approximately 30 years. He is a principal and developer of commercial and residential real estate projects in Washington, Idaho and Arizona. Since 1989 he has owned and operated a disability management consulting firm and has worked as a senior consultant specializing in negotiated settlements and forensic testimony on disability related court cases. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology from Eastern Washington University in 1973 and a Master of Education Degree from Whitworth University in 1977. Mr. McKinney is a past director and officer of Silver Crest Resources, Inc. and a past director and officer of Hanover Gold/Rock Energy Resources

Gordon F. Lee.  Mr. Lee has over 36 years of experience in various management capacities for public companies, which includes merger and acquisition consulting and capital raises. He has special expertise with public companies in the natural resource industries, with most recent experience in various coal mining projects in Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Alabama.

Matthew J. Colbert.  Mr. Colbert has served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since December 2007. Mr. Colbert was appointed as Secretary/Treasurer of the Company on December 16, 2009 and on April 22, 2011 he was appointed as a director of the Company. Mr. Colbert has over fourteen years of experience in public and corporate accounting. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of Idaho and is licensed as a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Washington. Before being appointed CFO, Mr. Colbert had been the Controller of the Company since August 2007. Mr. Colbert currently serves as the CFO of Josephine Mining Corp., a TSX.V listed mining

36

company. Mr. Colbert also served as CFO and President of Lifestream Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded company. Mr. Colbert also served on Lifestream’s Board of Directors. Earlier in his career, Mr. Colbert served as a Business Assurance Associate in the audit department of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, an international accounting and consulting firm.

Audit Committee

As of December 31, 2013, with the resignation of Robert O’Brien, Terrence Dunne now comprises the Company’s Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approves the selection of the Company’s independent certified public accountants to audit the annual financial statements and review the quarterly financial statements, discusses with the auditors and approves in advance the scope of the audit and reviews, reviews management’s administration of the system of internal controls, and reviews the Company’s procedures relating to business ethics. The Board of Directors has determined that Terrence Dunne meets the SEC definition of an “audit committee financial expert”.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The entire board of directors comprise the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. McKinney is an independent member of that Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for developing the Company’s approach to corporate governance issues and compliance with governance rules. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is also mandated to plan for the succession of the Company, including recommending director candidates, review of board procedures, size and organization, and monitoring of senior management with respect to governance issues. The committee is responsible for the development and implementation of corporate communications to ensure the integrity of the Company’s internal control and management information systems. The purview of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also includes the administration of the board’s relationship with the management of the Company, monitoring the quality and effectiveness of the Company’s corporate governance system and ensuring the effectiveness and integrity of the Company’s communication and reporting to shareholders and the public generally.

Compensation Committee

The entire board of directors comprises the Company’s Compensation Committee. Mr. McKinney is an independent member of that Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the compensation for the officers and the other agents and employees of the corporation. The Committee may delegate the authority to set the compensation of the officers, agents, and employees to the President. No officer may be prevented from receiving compensation as an officer solely because the officer is also a director of the corporation. The Committee shall fix the amount or salary to be paid to each director for service as a director or for attendance at each meeting of the Board. Salary or payment for service as a director shall not preclude a director from serving the corporation in any other capacity or from receiving compensation for service in that other capacity.

Legal Proceedings

No Director, or person nominated to become a Director or Executive Officer, has been involved in any legal action involving the Company during the past five years.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or person nominated or chosen by the Company to become a director or executive officer.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and regulations thereunder, the Company’s Directors, Executive Officers and beneficial owners of greater than 10% of our equity securities are required to file reports of their own ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with.  

37

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics for our Directors, Officers and employees. A copy of our Code of Conduct and Ethics can be obtained at no cost, by telephone at (509) 893-0171, by mail at: Gold Crest Mines, Inc., 724 East Metler Lane, Spokane, Washington 99218, attention: Investor Relations. We believe our Code of Conduct and Ethics is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct; provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with applicable laws; ensure prompt internal reporting of code violations; and provide accountability for adherence to the code.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and President (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 and 2012

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)	Total ($)
Terrence J. Dunne (1)	2013	$    24,000	—		—	$    24,000
Chief Executive Officer  and President	2012	$    24,000	—		—	$    24,000
Matthew J. Colbert (2)	2013	$    24,000	—		—	$    24,000
Chief Financial Officer	2012	$    24,000	$    1,800	(3)	—	$    25,800

_______

(1)

 Mr. Dunne was appointed President on December 16, 2009 and Chief Executive Officer on November 30, 2012.  

(2)

Mr. Colbert went from a full-time to a part-time employee beginning on September 16, 2008.

(3)

On March 1, 2013, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Colbert valued at $1,800.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

There were no unexercised options, stock that has not vested or equity incentive plan awards for each of the Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2013, and as such, a table has not been presented.

Employment Agreements

There are no employment agreements that were in effect between us and each of the Named Executive Officers during the last fiscal year.

Director Compensation

There was no director compensation for the year ended December 31, 2013.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information as of February 20, 2014 regarding the ownership of our Common Stock by:

*each person who is known by us to own more than 5% of our shares of common stock;

*each of our named executive officers and directors; and

*all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage of shares beneficially owned are based on 91,805,828 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 20, 2014.

For the purposes of the information provided below, beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and for each person includes shares that person has the right to acquire within 60 days following February 20, 2014 subject to options, warrants or similar instruments.

38

Name and Address of  Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner	Percent of Class
Terrence J. Dunne 1224 W. Riverside Ave., Apt 1006  Spokane, WA 99201	7,972,585	8.68%
Daniel R. McKinney Sr. 607 S. Government Way, Spokane, WA 99224	1,400,000	1.52%
Matthew J. Colbert 724 E. Metler Lane, Spokane, WA 99218	200,000	0.22%
Gordon F. Lee 724 E. Metler Lane, Spokane, WA 99218	0	0.00%
Total of all executive officers and directors (4 individuals)	9,572,585	10.43%
Cougar Gold LLC(1) 1700 Lincoln St., Ste 2600,  Denver, CO 80203	5,666,667	6.17%
Tony Alford(2) 7040 Interlaken Dr., Kernersville, NC 27284	6,751,440	7.35%

^{__________________________________________________}

⁽¹⁾

Cougar Gold LLC is a 5% or greater shareholder. The shares were verified by the schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2008 and a shareholder of record report dated February 20, 2014 obtained from Columbia Stock Transfer Company.

⁽⁵⁾

Mr. Alford is not an Officer or Director of the Company but is a 5% or greater shareholder.  The shares were verified by a shareholder of record report dated February 20, 2014 obtained from Columbia Stock Transfer Company.

There are no arrangements known to the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent time result in the change of control of the Company.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

In June 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Gold Crest Stock Plan (the “Plan”) which was approved by shareholders in December 2007. The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of the Company’s business.

The maximum number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the Plan adopted by the Company is currently set at 12,000,000 shares of which 4,000,000 may be granted as Incentive Stock Options to employees. As of December 31, 2013, the remaining number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Stock Plan was 11,450,000.

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not issue any new options under the 2007 Stock Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company had 5,280,000 stock options expire with exercise prices ranging from $0.28 to $0.53.  These options had been granted between June 19, 2007 and September 12, 2007 to members of the board of directors, employees and to consultants of the Company.  

39

The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2013.  Information is included for equity compensation plans not approved by our security holders.

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options		Weighted average excise price of outstanding options			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		-		$	-		n/a
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
2007 Stock Plan		-		$	-		11,350,000	(1)
Total		-		$	-		11,350,000

(1)          The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2007 Stock Plan will not exceed 12,000,000.  There have been 650,000 shares of fully-vested common stock issued under the 2007 stock plan to three directors and one employee leaving 11,350,000 available at December 31, 2013.  

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and through the date of this report, there were no related transactions.

Director Independence

Director Daniel R. McKinney is an independent member of the board of directors as defined by NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

In determining the matter of independence, Mr. McKinney had no transactions, relationships or arrangements with the Company within the last three years. Mr. McKinney had shares granted to him as directors’ fees, and had investment participation in the Company’s private placements on the same terms as all other investors in that offering.

“Independent director” means a person other than an executive officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the issuer’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

In determining the matter of director independence, the following independence criteria were utilized:

(1)

a director who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the company or by any parent or subsidiary of the company;

(2)

a director who accepted or who has a Family Member who accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $60,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence, other than the following:

(i)

compensation for board or board committee service;

(ii)

compensation paid to a Family Member who is an employee (other than an executive officer) of the company ; or

(iii)

benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation

(3)

Other relationships include:

(i)

a director who is a Family Member of an individual who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the Company as an executive officer, or a director who is, or has a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the Company made, or from which the Company received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient's consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than (a) payments arising solely from investments in the company's securities; or(b) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs.

40

(ii)

a director of the Company who is, or has a Family Member who is, employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the executive officers of the Company serve on the compensation committee of such other entity; or

(iii)

a director who is, or has a Family Member who is, a current partner of the Company's outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of the Company's outside auditor who worked on the company's audit at any time during any of the past three years.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q were $18,000 and $36,000, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no fees billed in the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements except as set forth in the preceding paragraph.

Tax Fees

There were no fees billed in the last two fiscal years for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning rendered by the Company’s principal accountant.

All Other Fees

The Company incurred no fees from the principal accountant during the last two fiscal years for products and services other than as set forth above.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

The Audit Committee meets prior to the filing of any Form 10-Q or 10-K to approve those filings. In addition, the Company’s audit committee pre-approves all services provided to the Company by DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. or any other professional services firm that are related to the preparation of the Company’s financial statements.

41

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
3.1	Articles of Incorporation for Silver Crest Mines, Inc. 9/11/1968.  Filed as Exhibit 3.1 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.2	Articles of Merger of Domestic Corporations into Silver Crest Mines, Inc. 12/20/1982.  Filed as Exhibit 3.2 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.3	Articles of Incorporation of Silver Crest Resources, Inc. 1/28/2003. Filed as Exhibit 3.3 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.4	Articles of Merger between Silver Crest Mines, Inc. into Silver Crest Resources, Inc. as filed in Nevada on 6/11/2003. Filed as Exhibit 3.4 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.5	Articles of Merger between Silver Crest Mines, Inc. into Silver Crest Resources, Inc. as filed in Idaho on 6/11/2003. Filed as Exhibit 3.5 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.6	Articles of Exchange of Niagara Mining and Development Company, Inc., and Silver Crest Resources, Inc. as filed in Nevada on 8/4/2006. Filed as Exhibit 3.6 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.7	Articles of Exchange of Niagara Mining and Development Company, Inc., and Silver Crest Resources, Inc. as filed in Idaho on 8/4/2006. Filed as Exhibit 3.7 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.8	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation for a Nevada Corporation 8/14/2006. Filed as Exhibit 3.8 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.9	Articles of Incorporation for Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. 7/28/2006. Filed as Exhibit 3.9 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.10	Articles of Incorporation for Niagara Mining and Development Company, Inc. 1/11/2005. Filed as Exhibit 3.10 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.11	Amended Bylaws adopted September 12, 2007. Filed as Exhibit 3.11 with the Company’s 10-KSB on March 26, 2008.
10.1	Employment Contract of Thomas H. Parker. Filed as Exhibit 10a with the Company’s 10-SB12G/A on August 6, 2007. Filed as Exhibit 3.11 with the Company’s 10-KSB on March 26, 2008.
10.2	Employment Contract of Chris Dail. Filed as Exhibit 10 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
10.3	AKO Venture Agreement dated May 5, 2008, between Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a Delaware Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 with the Company’s 10-Q on August 11, 2008.
10.4	Luna Venture Agreement dated May 5, 2008, between Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a Delaware Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 10.8 with the Company’s 10-Q on August 11, 2008.
10.5	Chilly Venture Agreement dated May 5, 2008, between Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a Delaware Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 10.9 with the Company’s 10-Q on August 11, 2008.
10.6	Option and Royalty Sales Agreement between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and the heirs of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 with the Company’s 10-KSB on March 26, 2008.
10.7	Option and Real Property Sales Agreement between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and JJO, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company and personal representative of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 with the Company’s 10-KSB on March 26, 2008.
10.8	Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement dated March 31, 2008, between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and Bradley Mining Company, a California Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 with the Company’s 10-Q on August 11, 2008.
10.9	Golden Lynx, LLC, Limited Liability Company Agreement dated April 18, 2008, between Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and Cougar Gold LLC. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 with the Company’s 10-Q on August 11, 2008.
10.10	Purchase Agreement dated March 13, 2009, between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and Frank Duval.  Filed as Exhibit 10.9 with the Company’s 10-K on March 25, 2009.
10.11	Master Earn-In Agreement dated March 28, 2011, between Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and North Fork LLC.  Filed as exhibit 10.1 with the Company’s 10-Q on May 18, 2011.
10.12	Terms Sheet and Loan Agreement and amendments thereto between Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and Afranex Gold Limited.  Filed as Exhibit 10.12 with the Company’s 10-KSB on April 17, 2013.
14	Code of Conduct and Ethics of Gold Crest Mines, Inc. adopted March 3, 2008. Filed as Exhibit 14.1 with the Company’s 8-K on March 3, 2008.
21	Subsidiaries of the Issuer. Filed as Exhibit 21 with the Company’s 10-KSB on April 17, 2013.
99	Gold Crest Mines, Inc., 2007 Stock Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99 with the Company’s 10-SB12G/A on August 6, 2007.
31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. Filed herewith.
31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. Filed herewith
32.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  Filed herewith
32.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  Filed herewith
101.INS(1)	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

42

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in Spokane, Washington on April 10, 2014.

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.

By:  /s/ Terrence J. Dunne

Terrence J. Dunne

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

In accordance with the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on April 10, 2014.

/s/  TERRENCE J. DUNNE	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Terrence J. Dunne
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/  MATTHEW J. COLBERT	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary/Treasurer and Director
Matthew J. Colbert
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/  DANIEL R. MCKINNEY SR.	Director
Daniel R. McKinney Sr.

43

EX-31

Exhibit 31.1

Certification pursuant to rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as

adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Principal Executive Officer

I, Terrence J. Dunne, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:   April 10, 2014

/s/ Terrence J. Dunne_______

    Terrence J. Dunne

    Chief Executive Officer

EX-31

Exhibit 31.2

Certification pursuant to rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as

adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Principal Financial Officer

I, Matt J. Colbert, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:   April 10, 2014

/s/        Matt J. Colbert_____  

     Matt J. Colbert

    Chief Financial Officer        

EX-32

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terrence J. Dunne, President and CEO of Gold Crest Mines, Inc. (“the “Registrant”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.

This annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  April 10, 2014

/s/ Terrence J. Dunne_______

Terrence J. Dunne

Chief Executive Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Matt J. Colbert, Chief Financial Officer of Gold Crest Mines, Inc. (“the “Registrant”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.

This annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  April 10, 2014

/s/        Matt J. Colbert_____  

            Matt J. Colbert

            Chief Financial Officer

XML

Note 9. Income Taxes: Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Details
Deferred Tax Assets, Operating Loss Carryforwards, Total	$ 1,974,928	$ 1,836,350
Deferred Tax Assets, Other	311,462	414,019
Deferred Tax Assets, Gross, Total	2,286,390	2,250,369
Deferred Tax Assets, Valuation Allowance, Total	(2,286,390)	(2,250,369)
Deferred Tax Assets, Net of Valuation Allowance, Total	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Note 4. Mineral Properties: Schedule of Mineral Properties (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Tables/Schedules

Schedule of Mineral Properties

Alaska Mineral Properties	Number of Claims	Acres	Carrying Value at       December 31, 2013	Carrying Value at December 31,    2012
Southwest Kuskokwim Project
AKO	73	11,680	$               2,543	$           2,543
Luna	50	8,000	-	-
Kisa	38	5,840	3,314	3,314
Gold Lake	69	9,720	5,516	5,516
TOTAL Southwest Kuskokwim Project	230	35,240	11,373	11,373
Buckstock Project
Chilly	44	7,040	-	-
TOTAL Buckstock Project	44	7,040	-	-
OVERALL TOTAL	274	42,280	$           11,373	$         11,373

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Property Evaluations (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Property Evaluations

Property Evaluations

Management of the Company periodically reviews the net carrying value of its properties on a property-by-property basis. These reviews consider the net realizable value of each property to determine whether a permanent impairment in value has occurred and the need for any asset write-down. An impairment loss will be recognized when the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to result from the use of an asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset. Measurement of an impairment loss will be based on the estimated fair value of the asset if the asset is expected to be held and used.

Although management will make its best estimate of the factors that affect net realizable value based on current conditions, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term which could adversely affect management's estimate of net cash flows expected to be generated from its assets, and necessitate asset impairment write-downs.

XML

Note 6. Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Details
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Issued for Services	100,000
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Issued for Services	$ 1,800
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues	2,500,000
Stock Issued During Period, Value, New Issues	$ 50,000

XML

Note 3. Going Concern

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 3. Going Concern

NOTE 3. Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has had no revenues and incurred an accumulated deficit of $9,708,021 through December 31, 2013. Another factor is that the Company has a negative current ratio of 0.10:1 at December 31, 2013. The current ratio is a measurement of the degree to which current assets cover current liabilities (current assets/current liabilities). A high ratio indicates a good probability the enterprise can retire current debts. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to seek additional capital from new equity securities offerings and joint venture agreements that will provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth and fully implement its business plan.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

Should the Company be unable to raise capital through future private placements, its business, and, as a result, its financial position, results of operations and cash flow will likely be materially adversely impacted. As such, substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern remains as of the date of these financial statements.

The Company believes it will only need an estimated $150,000 to $200,000 to continue operations through the next twelve months. The timing and amount of capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including the Company’s ability to successfully maintain a joint venture on our Alaska properties and the Company’s future personnel requirements.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net income (loss) per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share for the Company is the same as basic net income (loss) per share, as the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no outstanding common stock equivalents.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Share-based Compensation (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Share-based Compensation

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost is recognized when the event occurs. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted. For stock awards that do not vest immediately, the Company recognizes the compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Income Taxes (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes will be actually paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the deferred tax assets, if there is uncertainty regarding their realization.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Property, Plant and Equipment (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated using the straight line method over five to seven years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Betterments of a major nature are capitalized. When assets are retired or sold, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE 2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Consolidation of Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts and the accounts of wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Highly liquid short-term investments with a remaining maturity when purchased of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents. The Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents in high quality financial institutions.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in those statements and accompanying notes. Examples of areas requiring the use of estimates include the recoverability of mineral property and investments accounted for on the cost basis, assumptions used in determining the fair value of stock-based compensation and the expected economic lives and rates for depreciation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Exploration Stage Enterprise

The Company's financial statements are prepared pursuant to the accounting principles for development stage enterprises as it devotes substantially all of its efforts to acquiring and exploring mining interests that will eventually provide sufficient net profits to sustain the Company’s existence. Until such interests are engaged in major commercial production, the Company will continue to prepare its financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with entities in the development stage. Mining companies subject to development stage financial statement presentation are required to label their financial statements as an “Exploration Stage Company,” pursuant to guidance provided by SEC Guide 7 for Mining Companies.

Mine Exploration and Development Costs

All exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mine development costs are capitalized after proven and probable reserves have been identified. Amortization is calculated using the units-of-production method over the expected life of the operation based on the estimated recoverable mineral ounces.

Mineral Properties

Significant payments related to the acquisition of mineral properties, mineral rights, and mineral leases are capitalized. If a commercially mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when production begins using the units-of-production method based on proven and probable reserves. If no commercially mineable ore body is discovered, or such rights are otherwise determined to have no value, such costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined the property has no future economic value.

Property Evaluations

Management of the Company periodically reviews the net carrying value of its properties on a property-by-property basis. These reviews consider the net realizable value of each property to determine whether a permanent impairment in value has occurred and the need for any asset write-down. An impairment loss will be recognized when the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to result from the use of an asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset. Measurement of an impairment loss will be based on the estimated fair value of the asset if the asset is expected to be held and used.

Although management will make its best estimate of the factors that affect net realizable value based on current conditions, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term which could adversely affect management's estimate of net cash flows expected to be generated from its assets, and necessitate asset impairment write-downs.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value Accounting

Accounting guidance has established a hierarchy of assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The three levels included in the hierarchy are:

·         Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

·         Level 2: significant other observable inputs

·         Level 3: significant unobservable inputs

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has no assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost is recognized when the event occurs. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted. For stock awards that do not vest immediately, the Company recognizes the compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net income (loss) per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share for the Company is the same as basic net income (loss) per share, as the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no outstanding common stock equivalents.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes will be actually paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the deferred tax assets, if there is uncertainty regarding their realization.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated using the straight line method over five to seven years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Betterments of a major nature are capitalized. When assets are retired or sold, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

Reclamation and Remediation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations)

The Company had no operating properties at December 31, 2013 and 2012, but the Company’s mineral properties will be subject to standards for mine reclamation that have been established by various governmental agencies. For these non-operating properties, the Company accrues costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when it is probable that such costs will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to their present value. Such costs are based on management's current estimate of amounts that are expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed within current laws and regulations.

It is reasonably possible that due to uncertainties associated with defining the nature and extent of environmental contamination, application of laws and regulations by regulatory authorities, and changes in remediation technology, the ultimate cost of remediation and reclamation could change in the future. The Company continually reviews its accrued liabilities for such remediation and reclamation costs as evidence becomes available indicating that its remediation and reclamation liability has changed.

For operating properties the Company will recognize the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs will be capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the associated long-lived assets and depreciated over the lives of the assets on a units-of-production basis. Reclamation costs will be accreted over the life of the related assets and are adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate on the underlying obligation.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Reclamation and Remediation Costs (asset Retirement Obligations) (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Reclamation and Remediation Costs (asset Retirement Obligations)

Reclamation and Remediation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations)

The Company had no operating properties at December 31, 2013 and 2012, but the Company’s mineral properties will be subject to standards for mine reclamation that have been established by various governmental agencies. For these non-operating properties, the Company accrues costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when it is probable that such costs will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to their present value. Such costs are based on management's current estimate of amounts that are expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed within current laws and regulations.

It is reasonably possible that due to uncertainties associated with defining the nature and extent of environmental contamination, application of laws and regulations by regulatory authorities, and changes in remediation technology, the ultimate cost of remediation and reclamation could change in the future. The Company continually reviews its accrued liabilities for such remediation and reclamation costs as evidence becomes available indicating that its remediation and reclamation liability has changed.

For operating properties the Company will recognize the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs will be capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the associated long-lived assets and depreciated over the lives of the assets on a units-of-production basis. Reclamation costs will be accreted over the life of the related assets and are adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate on the underlying obligation.

XML

Note 9. Income Taxes (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Details
Unrecognized Tax Benefits Resulting in Net Operating Loss Carryforward	$ 5,808,613	$ 5,401,030

XML

GOLD CREST MINES, INC. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 16,813		$ 1,552
Total Current Assets	16,813		1,552
Mineral properties	11,373		11,373
TOTAL ASSETS	28,186		12,925
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	19,051		26,713
Accrued liabilities	69,434		47,366
Loan from Afranex	80,213	[1]	25,213	[1]
Total Current Liabilities	168,698		99,292
Total Liabilities	168,698		99,292
Commitments and contingencies	0	[2]	0	[2]
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock; no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding	0		0
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 91,805,828 and 89,205,828 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	91,806		89,206
Additional paid-in capital	9,475,703		9,426,503
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage	(9,708,021)		(9,602,076)
Total Stockholders' Deficit	(140,512)		(86,367)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$ 28,186		$ 12,925

[1] Note 4

[2] Notes 4 and 11

XML

GOLD CREST MINES, INC. (An Exploration Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended				108 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$ (105,945)		$ 20,831		$ (9,708,021)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation			159		53,193
Common stock and options issued for services					1,368,976
Equity compensation for management and directors	1,800				1,218,041
Interest paid with common shares					12,500
Settlement of drilling contract					161,813
Gain recognized on equipment exchanged in settlement of accounts payable					(3,421)
Loss on disposal of equipment					16,738
Abandonment of mineral lease					83,600
Impairment of mineral properties and royalty interest					616,875
Gain realized from advances from Gold Crown		[1]	(117,659)	[1]	(117,659)	[1]
Impairment of investment in Golden Lynx LLC					43,202
Gain on sale of mineral properties					(16,875)
Gain on settlement of accounts payable					(49,519)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Interest receivable					(6,266)
Prepaid expenses and deposits					57,999
Miscellaneous receivable					3,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	14,406		48,841		167,833
Advances from Gold Crown		[1]		[1]	117,659	[1]
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	(89,739)		(47,828)		(5,980,332)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Cash received in reverse merger					7,456
Note receivable issued					(200,000)
Purchase of royalty interest in mineral property					(400,000)
Purchase of mineral properties					(388,175)
Proceeds from the sale of equipment					22,979
Proceeds from the sale of mineral properties					50,000
Purchase of equipment					(134,971)
Net cash used by investing activities					(1,042,711)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings under line of credit					250,000
Payments on line of credit					(250,000)
Proceeds from the issuance of stock on the exercise of warrants					201,300
Sale of common stock, net of issuance costs	50,000				6,758,343
Loan from Afranex	55,000	[2]	25,213	[2]	80,213	[2]
Net cash provided by financing activities	105,000		25,213		7,039,856
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	15,261		(22,615)		16,813
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	1,552		24,167
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	16,813		1,552		16,813
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid					2,273
Taxes paid	0		0		0
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Land contributed in exchange for investment in Golden Lynx LLC					54,575
Land held in Golden Lynx LLC returned as mineral properties					11,373
Note receivable forgiven in connection with settlement agreement					120,000
Equipment relinquished in connection with settlement agreement					12,654
Equipment exchanged for settlement of accounts payable					$ 29,828

[1] Note 5

[2] Note 4

XML

Note 9. Income Taxes: Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Tables/Schedules

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Deferred tax asset
Net operating loss carry forward	$	1,974,928	$	1,836,350
Exploration costs and other		311,462		414,019
		2,286,390		2,250,369
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		(2,286,390)		(2,250,369)
Net deferred tax asset	$	0	$	0

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Exploration Stage Enterprise (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Exploration Stage Enterprise

Exploration Stage Enterprise

The Company's financial statements are prepared pursuant to the accounting principles for development stage enterprises as it devotes substantially all of its efforts to acquiring and exploring mining interests that will eventually provide sufficient net profits to sustain the Company’s existence. Until such interests are engaged in major commercial production, the Company will continue to prepare its financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with entities in the development stage. Mining companies subject to development stage financial statement presentation are required to label their financial statements as an “Exploration Stage Company,” pursuant to guidance provided by SEC Guide 7 for Mining Companies.

XML

Note 3. Going Concern (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Details
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage	$ 9,708,021	$ 9,602,076

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Mineral Properties (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Mineral Properties

Mineral Properties

Significant payments related to the acquisition of mineral properties, mineral rights, and mineral leases are capitalized. If a commercially mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when production begins using the units-of-production method based on proven and probable reserves. If no commercially mineable ore body is discovered, or such rights are otherwise determined to have no value, such costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined the property has no future economic value.

XML

Note 1. Organization and Description of Business

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 1. Organization and Description of Business

NOTE 1.  Organization and Description of Business

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Gold Crest” and “the Company”) is a Nevada corporation originally incorporated on August 20, 1968, as Silver Crest Mines, Inc., an Idaho corporation.

On August 1, 2006, Gold Crest acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Niagara Mining and Development Co., (“Niagara”), an Idaho corporation formed on January 11, 2005, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. (“Kisa”), an Alaskan corporation formed on July 28, 2006. Gold Crest’s sole asset on the merger date was cash of $7,456, which was accounted for as being acquired by Niagara in exchange for 14,600,100 common shares of Niagara. Niagara’s sole asset on the merger date was cash of $150,000 and its wholly owned subsidiary Kisa. Neither company had liabilities on the date of the merger. This transaction has been treated as a reverse merger, effectively as if Niagara had issued shares for consideration equal to the net monetary assets of Gold Crest. Under reverse acquisition accounting, the consolidated financial statements of the entity are considered a continuation of the financial statements of Niagara, the accounting acquirer. On June 20, 2008, 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Kisa were transferred from Niagara to the Company.

The Company is in the business of exploration, development, and if warranted the mining of properties containing valuable mineral deposits. The focus of the Company’s exploration programs is directed at precious metals, primarily gold.

XML

Statement of Financial Position - Parenthetical (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Statement of financial position
Preferred Stock, Par Value	$ 0	$ 0
Preferred Stock, Shares Authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred Stock, Shares Issued	0	0
Preferred Stock, Shares Outstanding	0	0
Common Stock, Par Value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	500,000,000	500,000,000
Common Stock, Shares Issued	91,805,828	89,205,828
Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	91,805,828	89,205,828

XML

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

NOTE 11.  Commitments and Contingencies

Alaska Mineral Property Rent and Assessment Work Commitments

In Alaska, land holdings consist of state mining claims and prospecting sites totaling 42,280 acres of land. Annual rental payments in the approximate amount of $75,000 for these claims are due by November 30, 2014. If these rental payments are not paid by the due date, the claims will be considered abandoned. The annual rental payments that were due on November 30, 2013 were paid in full by the Company’s joint venture partner.

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water requires that upon the prospecting, and the discovery of a locatable mineral and the staking of mineral location, annual labor must be performed on the location each labor year in further development of the locatable mineral so that it can be mined. The labor year for the claims begins on September 1 and ends the following September 1. The Company or its joint venture partner, if applicable, will be required to perform qualified labor in the approximate amount of $110,000 by September 1, 2013 with the possibility, depending on any qualified carry-over amounts that can be applied to the labor year ending September 1, 2014 on certain claim groups, will need to be performed by the September 1, 2013 deadline. If these labor requirements are not met by the due date, the claims will be considered abandoned. The annual work commitments and annual fees were fulfilled and all necessary fees and filings were made by the Company’s joint venture partner for the season ending September 30, 2013. The commitments and annual assessments for 2014 will be due no later than November 30, 2014.

XML

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Gold Crest Mines Inc
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2013
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0001375618
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	91,805,828
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Entity Public Float		$ 1,925,736

XML

Note 12. Subsequent Events

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 12. Subsequent Events

NOTE 12.  Subsequent Events

Afranex Terms Sheet Extension

On January 30, 2014, the Company agreed to an extension to the Terms Sheet between the Company and Afranex.  The new extension agreement extends the expiration date of the Terms Sheet with Afanex from January 31, 2014 to March 31, 2014.  On March 24, 2014, it was then agreed by mutual consent, that the Terms Sheet expiration date be extended again out until June 30, 2014

Afranex Loan Facility Agreement Extension

On January 30, 2014, the Company agreed to extend the due date of the Afranex Loan Facility from January 31, 2014 to March 31, 2014.  The intent was to keep the terms along the same line as the Terms Sheet Extension above.

XML

GOLD CREST MINES, INC. (An Exploration Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended				108 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2013
Income statement
REVENUES	$ 0		$ 0		$ 0
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Exploration expenditures					4,352,387
Settlement of drilling contract					161,813
Abandonment of mineral lease					83,600
Gain on sale of mineral lease					(16,875)
Mineral lease option and extension income	(30,000)				(60,000)
Impairment of mineral properties and royalty interest					616,875
Impairment of investment in Golden Lynx LLC					43,202
Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment					16,738
Legal and accounting expenses	35,907		35,995		652,487
Directors' fees					846,000
General and administrative	100,038		60,833		3,235,594
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES	105,945		96,828		9,931,821
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS	(105,945)		(96,828)		(9,931,821)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income					79,182
Gain realized from advances from Gold Crown		[1]	117,659	[1]	117,659	[1]
Interest expense					(22,560)
Gain on settlement of accounts payable					49,519
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)			117,659		223,800
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES	(105,945)		20,831		(9,708,021)
INCOME TAXES	0		0		0
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$ (105,945)		$ 20,831		$ (9,708,021)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED	$ 0.00		$ 0.00
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING BASIC AND DILUTED	90,309,390		89,205,828

[1] Note 5

XML

Note 6. Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 6. Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants

NOTE 6.  Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of its common stock. All shares of common stock are equal to each other with respect to voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights. Owners of shares are entitled to one vote for each share owned at any Shareholders’ meeting. The common stock of the Company does not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than fifty percent (50%) of the shares voting in an election of directors may elect all of the directors if they choose to do so.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company had the following issuances of common stock:

On March 1, 2013, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to an officer and director valued at $1,800.  

On July 22, 2013 the Company began a private placement offering up to a maximum of 2,500,000 shares at $0.02 per share for a maximum of $50,000 in proceeds.  The offering scheduled ended on August 15, 2013 and as of that date the Company had issued the full 2,500,000 shares raising a total of $50,000.  The shares were being offered and sold by officers and directors of the Company who received no remuneration for the sale of the shares.

There were no issuances of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Common Stock Warrants

There was no warrant activity during 2013 and no warrants were outstanding at December 31, 2013 or 2012.

XML

Note 5. Advances From Gold Crown

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 5. Advances From Gold Crown

NOTE 5.  Advances from Gold Crown

On September 7, 2011, the Company executed a non-binding letter of intent (“LOI”) to enter into a business combination transaction with Gold Crown, Inc (“Gold Crown”).  On October 17, 2011, in connection with the proposed business combination, affiliates of Gold Crown made a non-refundable $117,659 advance to the Company. The funds were used for the following:

·         to settle outstanding accounts payable for past services that totaled $63,019 for a settlement amount of only $13,500 resulting in a gain on the settlement of accounts payable in the amount of $49,519,

·         engage professionals to conduct due diligence, and

·         initiate procedures and actions with a view toward entering into a definitive business combination agreement.

The Company recorded the advances as a current liability in 2011 as management believed that while no explicit agreement existed requiring the Company to return the advances if a business combination did not take place, there may be an implied obligation for the Company to perform certain actions and activities in connection with the ultimate determination of whether or not a business combination will take place. 

The LOI had a sixty (60) day no shop clause from the date of the LOI.  The LOI also indicated that within sixty (60) days of the signing of the LOI, the Company and Gold Crown would negotiate and execute a definitive Exchange agreement and related documents and certificates which would have incorporated in more complete detail, the terms from the original LOI.  Subsequently, the sixty (60) days passed without entering into a more definitive Exchange agreement.  The Company is no longer obligated to the LOI and is free to pursue other options that would benefit the Company. 

At this time, the Company has terminated any further discussions with the principals of Gold Crown, but has left open the very remote possibility that Gold Crown would present the following items for renewed discussions:

·         audited financial statements by a PCAOB qualified audit firm

·         complete updated mine engineering and geological reports on Gold Crown’s properties

·         verify that adequate financing is in place

·         verify that a qualified slate of officers and directors have been retained

·         prepare a professional five year projection with verifiable numbers in regard to future production amounts, revenue costs, expenses, annual tonnage of ore to be mined and milled, etc.

If the Gold Crown personnel supplied the aforementioned documents, the board of directors of Gold Crest may then review and evaluate such a proposal.  However, Gold Crest is actively pursuing other potential merger candidates.  Since discussions with the principals of Gold Crown have terminated, the $117,659 in advances from Gold Crown under the original LOI have been recognized in the statement of operations in 2012 and is therefore no longer a liability.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Mine Exploration and Development Costs (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Mine Exploration and Development Costs

Mine Exploration and Development Costs

All exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mine development costs are capitalized after proven and probable reserves have been identified. Amortization is calculated using the units-of-production method over the expected life of the operation based on the estimated recoverable mineral ounces.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Consolidation of Subsidiaries (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Consolidation of Subsidiaries

Consolidation of Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts and the accounts of wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

XML

Note 9. Income Taxes

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 9. Income Taxes

NOTE 9.  Income Taxes

The Company did not recognize a provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had deferred tax assets principally arising from the net operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes multiplied by an expected rate of 34%.  For the periods presented, the effective income tax rate differed from the expected rate because of the effects of changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. Changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 relate only to corresponding changes in deferred tax assets for those periods. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has be established at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The significant components of the deferred tax asset at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Deferred tax asset
Net operating loss carry forward	$	1,974,928	$	1,836,350
Exploration costs and other		311,462		414,019
		2,286,390		2,250,369
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		(2,286,390)		(2,250,369)
Net deferred tax asset	$	0	$	0

At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $5,808,613 and $5,401,030 respectively, which expire in the years 2024 through 2033.

The Company has analyzed its filing positions in all jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns and found no positions that would require a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits to be recognized.

We have determined that we are subject to examination of our income tax filings in the United States and state jurisdictions for the 2011 through 2013 tax years. In the event that the Company is assessed penalties and or interest, penalties will be charged to other operating expense and interest will be charged to interest expense.

XML

Note 7. Preferred Stock

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 7. Preferred Stock

NOTE 7.  Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is entitled to preference over the common stock with respect to the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, or in the event of any other distribution of assets of the Company among its shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs. The authorized but un-issued shares of Preferred Stock may be divided into and issued in designated series from time to time by one or more resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors. The Directors in their sole discretion have the power to determine the preferences, limitations, and relative rights of each series of Preferred Stock within the limits set forth in the Nevada Business Corporation Act. At December 31, 2013, no preferred stock has been issued.

XML

Note 8. Stock Based Compensation

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 8. Stock Based Compensation

NOTE 8.  Stock Based Compensation

Stock Based Compensation Plans

In June 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Gold Crest Stock Plan (the “Plan”) which was approved by shareholders in December 2007. The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of the Company’s business.

The maximum number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the Plan adopted by the Company is currently set at 12,000,000 shares of which 4,000,000 may be granted as Incentive Stock Options to employees. As of December 31, 2013, the remaining number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Stock Plan was 11,350,000.

Stock Options

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not issue any new options under the 2007 Stock Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company had 5,280,000 stock options expire with exercise prices ranging from $0.28 to $0.53.  These options had been granted between June 19, 2007 and September 12, 2007 to members of the board of directors, employees and to consultants of the Company.

The following is a summary of stock option activity from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013:

	Number of Shares Under Options	Weighted Average  Exercise Price
Outstanding January 1, 2012	5,280,000	$                      0.52
Granted	—	—
Exercised	—	—
Forfeited	—	—
Expired	(5,280,000)	0.52
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2012	0	$                         —
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013	0	$                         —

XML

Note 10. Related Party Transactions

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 10. Related Party Transactions

NOTE 10.  Related Party Transactions

There were no related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

XML

Note 8. Stock Based Compensation: Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Tables/Schedules

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity

	Number of Shares Under Options	Weighted Average  Exercise Price
Outstanding January 1, 2012	5,280,000	$                      0.52
Granted	—	—
Exercised	—	—
Forfeited	—	—
Expired	(5,280,000)	0.52
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2012	0	$                         —
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013	0	$                         —

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Use of Estimates (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in those statements and accompanying notes. Examples of areas requiring the use of estimates include the recoverability of mineral property and investments accounted for on the cost basis, assumptions used in determining the fair value of stock-based compensation and the expected economic lives and rates for depreciation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

XML

Note 12. Subsequent Events (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Details
Subsequent Event, Description	Afranex Terms Sheet Extension On January 30, 2014, the Company agreed to an extension to the Terms Sheet between the Company and Afranex. The new extension agreement extends the expiration date of the Terms Sheet with Afanex from January 31, 2014 to March 31, 2014. On March 24, 2014, it was then agreed by mutual consent, that the Terms Sheet expiration date be extended again out until June 30, 2014 Afranex Loan Facility Agreement Extension On January 30, 2014, the Company agreed to extend the due date of the Afranex Loan Facility from January 31, 2014 to March 31, 2014. The intent was to keep the terms along the same line as the Terms Sheet Extension above.

XML

GOLD CREST MINES, INC. (An Exploration Stage Company) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (USD $)		Common Stock Shares	Common Stock Amount	Additional Paid-in Capital	Common Stock Subscribed	Accumulated Deficit During Exploration Stage	Total
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2005
Issuance of Common Stock for cash, pre-merger at 0.004 per share			$ 37,500	$ 112,500			$ 150,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash, pre-merger at 0.004 per share, stock		37,500,000
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with reverse merger	[1]		14,600	(7,144)			7,456
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with reverse merger, stock		14,600,100
Issuance of Common Stock for cash, post-merger at 0.30 per share			10,797	2,887,910			2,898,707
Issuance of Common Stock for cash, post-merger at 0.30 per share, stock		10,797,062
Issuance of Common Stock for interest at 0.30 per share			42	12,458			12,500
Issuance of Common Stock for interest at 0.30 per share, stock		41,667
Issuance of Common Stock for share-based compensation at 0.59 and 0.63 per share			1,800	1,064,200			1,066,000
Issuance of Common Stock for share-based compensation at 0.59 and 0.63 per share, stock		1,800,000
Stock options granted at 0.30 per share				72,000			72,000
Net income (loss)						(1,845,103)	(1,845,103)
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2006			64,739	4,141,924		(1,845,103)	2,361,560
Shares Issued at Dec. 31, 2006		64,738,829
Issuance of Common Stock for common stock subscribed					(132,500)		(132,500)
Issuance of Common Stock for brokerage fees				(77,335)			(77,335)
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.20 per share with warrants attached			4,035	802,965			807,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.20 per share with warrants attached, stock		4,035,000
Issuance of Common Stock for common stock issuable at 0.20 per share with warrants attached			663	131,837			132,500
Issuance of Common Stock for common stock issuable at 0.20 per share with warrants attached, stock		662,500
Stock options granted at 0.28 and 0.53 per share				1,032,772			1,032,772
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.30 per share		7,529,999	7,530	2,251,470			2,259,000
Issuance of Common Stock for directors fees between 0.53 and 0.54 per share		400,000	400	213,600			214,000
Issuance of Common Stock for share-based compensation at 0.28 per share		50,000	50	13,950			14,000
Net income (loss)						(5,602,077)	(5,602,077)
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2007			77,417	8,511,183	(132,500)	(7,447,180)	1,008,920
Shares Issued at Dec. 31, 2007		77,416,328
Stock options for share-based compensation at 0.28 per share				121,089			121,089
Stock warrants Exercised at 0.30 per share			300	89,700			90,000
Stock warrants Exercised at 0.30 per share, stock		300,000
Issuance of Common Stock for directors fees at 0.10 per share			400	39,600			40,000
Issuance of Common Stock for directors fees at 0.10 per share, stock		400,000
Issuance of Common Stock for services at 0.10 per share			100	9,900			10,000
Issuance of Common Stock for services at 0.10 per share, stock		100,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash ranging from 0.05 to 0.15 per share			5,666	594,334			600,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash ranging from 0.05 to 0.15 per share, stock		5,666,667
Issuance of Common Stock for common stock subscribed					111,300		111,300
Issuance of Common Stock Forgiveness of remaining common stock subscribed			(106)	(21,094)	21,200
Issuance of Common Stock Forgiveness of remaining common stock subscribed, stock		(106,000)
Net income (loss)						(1,898,724)	(1,898,724)
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2008			83,777	9,344,712		(9,345,904)	82,585
Shares Issued at Dec. 31, 2008		83,776,995
Stock options for share-based compensation at 0.28 per share				13,355			13,355
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.01 per share			1,000	9,000			10,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.01 per share, stock		1,000,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.03 per share			929	26,936			27,865
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.03 per share, stock		928,833
Net income (loss)						(171,515)	(171,515)
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2009			85,706	9,394,003		(9,517,419)	(37,710)
Shares Issued at Dec. 31, 2009		85,705,828
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.01 per share			2,500	22,500			25,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.01 per share, stock		2,500,000
Net income (loss)						(34,450)	(34,450)
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2010			88,206	9,416,503		(9,551,869)	(47,160)
Shares Issued at Dec. 31, 2010		88,205,828
Issuance of Common Stock for directors fees at 0.02 per share			100	1,900			2,000
Issuance of Common Stock for directors fees at 0.02 per share, stock		100,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.01 per share			900	8,100			9,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at 0.01 per share, stock		900,000
Net income (loss)						(71,038)	(71,038)
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2011			89,206	9,426,503		(9,622,907)	(107,198)
Shares Issued at Dec. 31, 2011		89,205,828
Net income (loss)						20,831	20,831
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2012			89,206	9,426,503		(9,602,076)	(86,367)
Shares Issued at Dec. 31, 2012		89,205,828
Stock issued for share-based compensation at $0.018 per share			100	1,700			1,800
Stock issued for share-based compensation at $0.018 per share, stock		100,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at $0.02 per share			2,500	47,500			50,000
Issuance of Common Stock for cash at $0.02 per share, stock		2,500,000
Net income (loss)						(105,945)	(105,945)
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2013			$ 91,806	$ 9,475,703		$ (9,708,021)	$ (140,512)
Shares Issued at Dec. 31, 2013		91,805,828

[1] Note 1

XML

Note 4. Mineral Properties

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes

Note 4. Mineral Properties

NOTE 4.  Mineral Properties

In Alaska, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Kisa controls or has interests in five claim blocks consisting of 274 State of Alaska mining claims covering 42,280 acres. Four of the claim blocks making up 35,240 acres comprise the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project and the remaining claim group consisting of 7,040 acres is the Company’s Buckstock Project. The Southwest Kuskokwim claim blocks are located in southwest Alaska approximately 90 miles east of the village of Bethel on State of Alaska-owned lands. The Buckstock claim group is located approximately 30-80 miles south of the Donlin Creek deposit and north of the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim claim groups.

The following is a summary of the Company’s mineral properties in Alaska:

Alaska Mineral Properties	Number of Claims	Acres	Carrying Value at       December 31, 2013	Carrying Value at December 31,    2012
Southwest Kuskokwim Project
AKO	73	11,680	$               2,543	$           2,543
Luna	50	8,000	-	-
Kisa	38	5,840	3,314	3,314
Gold Lake	69	9,720	5,516	5,516
TOTAL Southwest Kuskokwim Project	230	35,240	11,373	11,373
Buckstock Project
Chilly	44	7,040	-	-
TOTAL Buckstock Project	44	7,040	-	-
OVERALL TOTAL	274	42,280	$           11,373	$         11,373

In Alaska, the lands are held under and are subject to the State’s mining laws and regulations. The Company is required to perform certain work commitments and pay annual assessments to the State of Alaska to hold these claims in good standing. The annual work commitment and annual fees were fulfilled and all necessary fees and filings have been made for the season ended September 30, 2013. The commitments and annual assessments for 2014 will be due no later than November 30, 2014. See “Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies”.

North Fork Option Master Earn-in Agreement

On January 27, 2010, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Kisa signed an option agreement with North Fork Resources Pty Ltd (“North Fork”) which grants North Fork an exclusive option to purchase and/or earn an interest in the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area (“The Projects”).

Under the terms of the option and amendments thereto, North Fork made payments to the Company totaling $30,000 in 2010 for the exclusive right to explore the claims up until October 31, 2010. On October 18, 2010 North Fork formally notified the Company of their intent to exercise the option over the Alaska properties.  The total of the two payments of $30,000 received from North Fork was recognized as income during the year ended December 31, 2010.

On March 28, 2011 the Master Earn-In agreement (“the Agreement”) with North Fork was executed which maintained the same terms as the originals terms.

On October 28, 2013, the Company and North Fork agreed to an extension on the first earn-in date from October 31, 2013 to October 31, 2014, this extension was later memorialized in an executed amendment dated February 12, 2014.  As consideration for the one year extension, North Fork made a one-time extension payment to the Company in the amount of $30,000 which was recognized as income during the year ended December 31, 2013.

The following is a breakdown of the proposed earn-in terms, as amended:

1.        The initial interest at the time North Fork exercises its option to earn into The Projects will be as follows:

a.        Gold Crest Mines, Inc. – 100%

b.       North Fork – 0%

2.        North Fork can earn a 51% interest in The Projects by the expenditure of $3,000,000 on The Projects by October 31, 2014.

3.        If North Fork withdraws from the Joint Venture prior to earning a 51% interest in The Projects, it will have no further interest in The Projects.

4.        North Fork can earn an additional 24% interest in The Projects, taking its total interest to 75% by the expenditure of an additional $3,000,000 by October 31, 2016.

5.        North Fork can earn a total interest of 90% in any of The Projects claim blocks by the completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study.

6.        Gold Crest Mines, Inc. will retain a free carried 10% interest in The Projects up to a Decision to Mine at which point it can elect to contribute at 10% or dilute to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty.

7.        North Fork is obliged to keep The Projects in good standing.

8.        North Fork is the sole manager of The Projects and will make all decisions in regards to the exploration programs.

Afranex Terms Sheet

On June 5, 2012, and later amended on August 28, 2012 and February 13, 2013, the Company signed a Terms Sheet with Afranex, a company related to the Company’s joint venture partner North Fork. On February 26, 2013, and later amended on March 26, 2013 and again on June 5, 2013,  the Company executed a new version of the Terms Sheet with Afranex wherein Afranex proposed to purchase up to 100% of Kisa, Gold Crest’s wholly owned subsidiary, in one of two proposed options.  The Kisa common shares represent 100% ownership of the capital stock of Kisa. 

Kisa’s only assets include the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project and the Buckstock Project areas which consist of exploration properties in southwest Alaska comprised of 42,280 acres of State of Alaska-owned lands.

One option is if the Company sells 100% of its ownership interest in Kisa to Afranex, Afranex would pay Gold Crest 12,500,000 shares of Afranex stock valued at AUD$0.20 per share and grant Gold Crest an Afranex ordinary share 4-year option to purchase 3,125,000 shares exercisable at AUD$0.25 per share.

Alternatively, if the Company sells 80% of its Kisa shares to Afranex, Afranex would pay Gold Crest 10,000,000 ordinary shares of Afranex stock valued at AUD$0.20 per share and grant Afranex an option to purchase the remaining 20% of the Kisa shares in consideration for Afranex ordinary shares valued at $500,000, on or before June 30, 2015.  Gold Crest would be granted a 4-year option to purchase 2,500,000 ordinary Afranex shares at a price of AUD$0.25 per share.

The following is a breakdown of the main details of the Terms Sheet, which incorporates the final amendments to the terms sheet:

1.        Consideration:

a.        Afranex agrees to pay Gold Crest the sum of $100,000 (of which $25,000 was advanced to Gold Crest from Afranex as of December 31, 2012 and a total of $80,000 as of December 31, 2013, and

b.     One option is if the Company sells 80% of its ownership interest in Kisa to Afranex, Afranex would issue Gold Crest 10,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares in the capital of Afranex at an issue price of AUD$0.20 per share, or that number of shares depending on the way Afranex decides to become an ASX-listed company (Consideration Shares) and grant Gold Crest 2,500,000 unlisted options to be issued fully paid, ordinary shares in Afranex, exercisable at AUD$0.25 per option and expiring four years from the date of grant.

c.     The alternative option would be if the Company sells 100% of its ownership interest in Kisa to Afranex, Afranex would pay Gold Crest 12,500,000 shares of Afranex stock valued at AUD$0.20 per share and grant Gold Crest an Afranex ordinary share 4-year option to purchase 3,125,000 shares exercisable at AUD$0.25 per share.

2.        Completion of the Acquisition is conditional on the satisfaction (or waiver by the parties) of the certain conditions precedent such as due diligence by Afranex on Kisa, the approval of the board of Afranex as well as the approval of the shareholders of Gold Crest among other conditions.  If these conditions are not satisfied or waived by January 31, 2014, this term sheet agreement will expire. See “Note 12. Subsequent Events – Afranex Terms Sheet Extension” for further details.

3.        Settlement of the Acquisition will occur on that date which is five business days of satisfaction (or waiver) of the conditions precedent.  At settlement of (b) or (c), Afranex will settle the consideration set forth above and Gold Crest will deliver the respective number of Kisa shares.  In the event the Company only sells Afranex 80% of the Kisa shares, Gold Crest agrees that an incorporated joint venture is created between Afranex or Parent and Gold Crest in relation to Kisa on the terms and conditions of the joint venture, which, upon the commencement date, the initial shareholding interests in Kisa will be 80% Afranex and 20% Gold Crest.

4.        If Gold Crest sells 80% of Kisa to Afranex, Afranex may, by written notice to Gold Crest at any time up to June 30, 2015, elect to acquire all (and not part) of Gold Crest’s remaining fully paid Kisa shares in return for the issue of AUD$500,000 worth of Afranex fully paid, ordinary shares if by IPO, or parent shares if Backdoor Listed, which is a corporate finance term that has the same meaning as reverse merger, reverse listing or reverse IPO.

5.        Notwithstanding the fact that this Terms Sheet is legally binding on the Parties, Afranex and Gold Crest agree to enter into a formal share sale and purchase agreement to more fully document the terms of the Acquisition (to be prepared by Afranex’s solicitors) which shall be on terms acceptable to Kisa and Afranex (acting reasonably) and which shall be consistent with the terms set out in the Terms Sheet.

Afranex Loan Facility Agreement

On July 26, 2012, the Company signed a Loan Facility Agreement (“Loan”) in the amount of $15,000 with Afranex which entitled the Company to make individual draw downs in $5,000 increments of the Loan until the Loan has been exhausted to provide the Company with immediate working capital requirements.   On October 26, 2012, the Company signed a first deed of variation to the Loan which increased the Loan amount from $15,000 to $25,000.   

On February 13, 2013, the Company signed a second deed of variation to the Loan which increased the Loan amount from $25,000 to $80,000.   The due date was also extended out to June 30, 2013.  As of December 31, 2013, the Company had received the entire $80,000 and recorded the funds as a current liability.  The funds are intended to be deducted from the $100,000 consideration per the Afranex terms sheet which subsequently was extended out to January 31, 2014 and on July 26, 2013, per the Third deed of variation to the loan facility agreement, the current liability of $80,000 has been extended out to January 31, 2014 also. See “Afranex Terms sheet” above and “Note 12. Subsequent Events – Afranex Loan Facility Agreement Extension” for further details.

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Fair Value Accounting (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Fair Value Accounting

Fair Value Accounting

Accounting guidance has established a hierarchy of assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The three levels included in the hierarchy are:

·         Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

·         Level 2: significant other observable inputs

·         Level 3: significant unobservable inputs

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has no assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

XML

Note 8. Stock Based Compensation: Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2011
Details
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Number	0	0	5,280,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price			$ 0.52
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Expirations in Period	(5,280,000)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Forfeitures and Expirations in Period, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 0.52

XML

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Cash and Cash Equivalents (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Highly liquid short-term investments with a remaining maturity when purchased of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents. The Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents in high quality financial institutions.