XML 40 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
NOTE 7 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company has entered into various consulting agreements with outside consultants. However, certain of these agreements included additional compensation on the basis of performance.  The Company does not have a commitment and contingency liability associated with these agreements.

 

In connection with the pending litigation with Eric Schick, our former President, alleging that we had committed certain unlawful employment practices, including retaliatory termination of his employment for “whistle blowing,” in connection with his separation from the Company in October 2008, the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), on September 14, 2011, notified the Company regarding its findings (the "OSHA Order").  In the OSHA Order, the Secretary of Labor, acting through OSHA, found that there was reasonable cause to conclude that the Company, and its former Chief Executive Officer, Scott Landow, violated the employee protection provisions of Section 806 of the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002.

 

In its findings, OSHA ordered that the Company, among other things, pay Mr. Schick certain compensatory and other damages, and reinstate Mr. Schick as the Company's President. The Company has filed an objection to the OSHA Order and has requested a formal hearing before an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") for the DOL, as the Company believes, among other errors in the OSHA Order, that the OSHA Order misstates certain material facts in connection with OSHA's findings that, if presented in accordance with the administrative procedures that govern formal proceedings before the DOL, may result in different findings.

 

 Effective August 3, 2012, without admitting any wrongdoing or liability, the Company settled all pending litigation with Schick (“Schick”), our former President, alleging that the Company had committed certain unlawful employment practices, including retaliatory termination of his employment for “whistle blowing,” in connection with his separation from the Company in October 2008.  The settlement provides for certain payments to Schick totaling $360,000, of which $180,000 is paid over a twelve-month period.  In addition, the Company or its designee is obligated to purchase from Schick 600,000 shares of common stock of the Company held by Schick. As a result of the settlement, all claims by Schick were dismissed, with prejudice, including all maters pending before the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (together, the “OSHA Matter”).  The Company had previously established a reserve of $250,000 in anticipation of the costs and expenses associated with defending the OSHA Matter, and believes that the settlement allows the Company to focus on the execution of its business plan without the costs, expenses and uncertainty of continued litigation.