XML 36 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
The following presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, assets and liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis:


Description


Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Caption
September 30, 2016
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
(in millions)
Corporate debt securities
Cash and cash equivalents
$
346

 
$
—

 
$
346

 
$
—

Corporate debt securities
Current assets—other
6

 
—

 
6

 
—

Interest rate swaps
Current assets—other
1

 
—

 
1

 
—

Corporate debt securities
Investments and other assets—other
14

 
—

 
14

 
—

Interest rate swaps
Investments and other assets—other
55

 
—

 
55

 
—

Canadian equity securities
Investments and other assets—other
17

 
17

 
—

 
—

Total Assets
$
439

 
$
17

 
$
422

 
$
—



Description


Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Caption
December 31, 2015
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
(in millions)
Corporate debt securities
Cash and cash equivalents
$
137

 
$
—

 
$
137

 
$
—

Corporate debt securities
Current assets—other
20

 
—

 
20

 
—

Commodity derivatives
Current assets—other
36

 
—

 
—

 
36

Commodity derivatives
Investments and other assets—other
5

 
—

 
—

 
5

Corporate debt securities
Investments and other assets—other
11

 
—

 
11

 
—

Interest rate swaps
Investments and other assets—other
37

 
—

 
37

 
—

Total Assets
$
246

 
$
—

 
$
205

 
$
41


The following presents changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs:
 
Three Months
Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
(in millions)
Derivative assets (liabilities)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value, beginning of period
$
(2
)
 
$
50

 
$
41

 
$
78

Total gains (losses):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Included in earnings
8

 
18

 
(7
)
 
27

Included in other comprehensive income
—

 
(4
)
 
1

 
(9
)
Purchases
—

 
(5
)
 
(1
)
 
(2
)
Settlements
(6
)
 
(6
)
 
(34
)
 
(41
)
Fair value, end of period
$
—

 
$
53

 
$
—

 
$
53

Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments held at the end of the period
$
—

 
$
5

 
$
—

 
$
(11
)

Level 1
Level 1 valuations represent quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 Valuation Techniques
Fair values of our financial instruments that are actively traded in the secondary market, including our long-term debt, are determined based on market-based prices. These valuations may include inputs such as quoted market prices of the exact or similar instruments, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources that may include models or matrix pricing tools, with reasonable levels of price transparency.
For interest rate swaps, we utilize data obtained from a third-party source for the determination of fair value. Both the future cash flows for the fixed-leg and floating-leg of our swaps are discounted to present value. In addition, credit default swap rates are used to develop the adjustment for credit risk embedded in our positions. We believe that since some of the inputs and assumptions for the calculations of fair value are derived from observable market data, a Level 2 classification is appropriate.
Level 3 Valuation Techniques
Level 3 valuation techniques include the use of pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques where at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial instruments also include those for which the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.
As of September 30, 2016, there are no financial instruments classified as Level 3. Those reported in Level 3 at December 31, 2015 consisted of NGL revenue swap contracts related to the Empress assets in Western Canada Transmission & Processing, which were disposed of on August 4, 2016. See Note 2 for further discussion related to the sale of Empress. As of December 31, 2015, we reported certain of our NGL basis swaps at fair value using Level 3 inputs due to such derivatives not having observable market prices for substantially the full term of the derivative asset or liability. For valuations that included both observable and unobservable inputs, if the unobservable input was determined to be significant to the overall inputs, the entire valuation was categorized in Level 3. This included derivatives valued using indicative price quotations whose contract length extended into unobservable periods.
The fair value of these NGL basis swaps was determined using a discounted cash flow valuation technique based on a forward commodity basis curve. For those derivatives, the primary input to the valuation model was the forward commodity basis curve, which was based on observable or public data sources and extrapolated when observable prices were not available.
Financial Instruments
The fair values of financial instruments that are recorded and carried at book value are summarized in the following table. Judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. These estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could have realized in current markets.
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Book
Value
 
Approximate
Fair Value
 
Book
Value
 
Approximate
Fair Value
 
(in millions)
Note receivable, noncurrent (a)
$
71

 
$
71

 
$
71

 
$
71

Long-term debt, including current maturities (b)
13,563

 
15,031

 
13,567

 
13,891

__________
(a)
Included within Investments in and Loans to Unconsolidated Affiliates.
(b)
Excludes commercial paper, capital leases, unamortized items and fair value hedge carrying value adjustments.
The fair value of our long-term debt is determined based on market-based prices as described in the Level 2 valuation technique described above and is classified as Level 2.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable, notes receivable—noncurrent, accounts payable and commercial paper are not materially different from their carrying amounts because of the short-term nature of these instruments or because the stated rates approximate market rates.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no material adjustments to assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.