2.4.0.80015 - Disclosure - Commitments and contingenciestruefalsefalse1false falsefalseFrom2013-01-01to2013-06-30http://www.sec.gov/CIK0001373485duration2013-01-01T00:00:002013-06-30T00:00:001true 1XBOR_CommitmentsAndContingenciesAbstractXBOR_falsenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalsefalse00falsefalsefalsexbrli:stringItemTypestringfalse0Commitments And Contingencies2false 2us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlockus-gaap_truenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalsefalse00<div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: center"><div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: left"><font style="display: inline; font: bold 10pt Times New Roman">10 – Commitments and contingencies</font></div> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block"><br /> </div> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: left"><font style="display: inline; font: 10pt Times New Roman"><font style="display: inline; text-decoration: underline">Litigation</font></font></div> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block"><br /> </div> <div style="text-indent: 36pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: left"><font style="display: inline; font: 10pt Times New Roman">On May 4, 2011, Clifton M. (Marty) Bloodworth filed a lawsuit in the State District Court of Midland County, Texas, against Doral West Corp. d/b/a Doral Energy Corp. and Everett Willard Gray II.  Mr. Bloodworth alleges that Mr. Gray, as CEO of the Company, made false representations which induced Mr. Bloodworth to enter into an employment contract that was subsequently breached by the Company.  The claims that Mr. Bloodworth has alleged are:  breach of his employment agreement with Doral, common law fraud, civil conspiracy breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act.  Mr. Bloodworth is seeking damages of approximately $280,000.  Mr. Gray and the Company deny that Mr. Bloodworth’s claims have any merit. </font></div> <div style="text-indent: 36pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: left"> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-indent: 36pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: left"><font style="display: inline; font: 10pt Times New Roman"><font style="background-color: #ffffff; display: inline">The Company was previously party to an engagement letter, dated February 7, 2012 (the </font><font style="background-color: #ffffff; display: inline">"Engagement Letter"), with KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. ("KeyBanc") pursuant to which KeyBanc was to act as exclusive financial advisor to the Company’s Board of Directors in connection with a possible "Transaction" (as defined in the Engagement Letter).  The Engagement Letter was formally terminated by the Company on August 21, 2012. The Engagement Letter provided that KeyBanc would be entitled to a fee upon consummation of a Transaction within a certain period of time following termination of the Engagement Letter. On May 16, 2013, KeyBanc delivered an invoice to the Company in the amount of $751,334, representing amounts purportedly owed by the Company to KeyBanc as a result of the consummation of a purported Transaction KeyBanc asserts had been consummated within the required time period and its out-of-pocket expenses in connection therewith.  The Company disputes that any Transaction was consummated and that KeyBanc is entitled to any out-of-pocket expenses.  The matter was originally filed in the 44th-B Judicial District Court for the State of Texas, Dallas County but was subsequently removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.  The Company intends to vigorously defend the action.</font></font></div> </div> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block"><br /> </div> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: left"><font style="display: inline; font: 10pt Times New Roman"><font style="display: inline; text-decoration: underline">Environmental Contingencies</font></font></div> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block"><br /> </div> <div style="text-indent: 36pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: left"><font style="display: inline; font: 10pt Times New Roman">The Company is subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment.  Environmental risk is inherent to oil and natural gas operations and the Company could be subject to environmental cleanup and enforcement actions.  The Company manages this environmental risk through appropriate environmental policies and practices to minimize the impact to the Company.</font></div> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block"><br /> </div> <div style="text-indent: 0pt; display: block; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; text-align: left"><font style="display: inline; font: 10pt Times New Roman"><font id="TAB1" style="margin-left: 36pt"></font>As of June 30, 2013, the Company had approximately $2,100,000 in environmental liabilities related to its operated Tom Tom Tomahawk field located in Chaves and Roosevelt counties New Mexico.  In February 2013, the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) accepted the Company’s remediation plan for the Tom Tom and Tomahawk fields.  The Company is working in conjunction with the BLM to initiate remediation on a site-by-site basis.  This is management’s best estimate of the costs of remediation and restoration with respect to these environmental matters, although the ultimate cost could differ materially.  Inherent uncertainties exist in these estimates due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulation, and legal standards regarding liability, and emerging remediation technologies for handling site remediation and restoration.  The Company expects to incur these expenditures over a twenty-four month period beginning in April 2013.</font></div></div>falsefalsefalsenonnum:textBlockItemTypenaThe entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 false0Commitments and contingenciesfalseCommitments and contingenciesUnKnownUnKnownUnKnownUnKnowntruefalsefalseSheethttp://xbres.com/role/CommitmentsAndContingencies12