XML 16 R6.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Organization and Basis of Presentation

 

Medical Imaging Corp., (“MIC” or the “Company”), a Nevada Corporation was incorporated in 2000. In 2005, the Company developed a business plan for private healthcare opportunities in Canada with the objective of owning and operating private diagnostic imaging clinics. In 2009, the Company purchased Canadian Teleradiology Services Inc., which operates as: Custom Teleradiology Services (“CTS”). CTS provides remote reading of medical diagnostic imaging scans for rural hospitals and clinics in Canada. In early 2010, the Company modified its business plan to grow its CTS subsidiary while commencing the acquisition of existing full service imaging clinics located in the United States and exploring the development of new diagnostic imaging technology. In 2012, the Company purchased Schuylkill Open MRI Inc., which operates as: Schuylkill Medical Imaging (“SMI”), an independent diagnostic imaging facility located in Pottsville, Pennsylvania. In 2014, the Company purchased Partners Imaging Center of Venice, LLC (“PIV”) located in Venice, Florida; Partners Imaging Center of Naples, LLC (“PIN”) located in Naples, Florida; and Partners Imaging Center of Charlotte, LLC (“PIC”) located in Port Charlotte, Florida.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

These consolidated financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

 

Principle of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Medical Imaging, Corp., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, CTS, SMI, PIV, PIN, and PIC. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. CTS’, SMI’s, PIV’s, PIN’s, and PIC’s accumulated earnings prior to their acquisitions are not included in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are published, and (iii) the reported amount of net sales, expenses and costs recognized during the periods presented. Adjustments made with respect to the use of estimates often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of consolidated financial statements; accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, cash includes cash on hand and cash in the bank.

 

Accounts Receivable Credit Risk

 

The allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for estimated credit losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the receivables portfolio.

 

Management evaluates various factors including expected losses and economic conditions to predict the estimated realization on outstanding receivables.

 

In connection with the acquisition of the three facilities located in Venice, Port Charlotte and Naples, Florida, the Company, in October 2014, entered into professional services agreements whereby the seller of those three facilities continued to handle the billing and collection for the imaging centers (the “third party billing”). The seller must still provide a full set of verification data to the Company with respect to its account receivable processing and collections so that the Company can determine the extent to which accounts submitted by the seller in connection with the third party billing have been collected or denied. Final verification will only be able to be completed after the conclusion of the services performed pursuant to the third party billing contract, and review of account balances which is expected during the 2017 fiscal year.

 

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the allowance for doubtful accounts from direct billings was $299,545 and $200,982, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts from third party billings (Florida operations) was $275,000 in both periods.

 

Although the gross receivable balance has increased significantly, management is actively pursuing collection efforts directly with patients and insurance payers and believes that the current allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient to cover any expected losses.

 

Goodwill and Indefinite - Lived Intangible Assets

 

The Company follows the provisions of Financial Accounting Standard Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. In accordance with ASC 350, goodwill, representing the excess of the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired and accounted for under the purchase method, acquired in business combinations is assigned to reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination as of the acquisitions date. Under this standard, goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives are not amortized. The Company assesses goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred in accordance with ASC 350. If the carrying value of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the difference. ASC 350 also requires that the fair value of indefinite-lived purchased intangible assets be estimated and compared to the carrying value. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the indefinite-lived purchased intangible assets is less than the carrying value. If the implied fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill impairment is indicated and goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

 

No goodwill impairment was recognized during 2017 or 2016.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company holds contracts with several hospitals and groups of health care facilities to provide Teleradiology services for a specific period of time. The Company bills for services rendered on a monthly basis. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, CTS held six contracts; four contracts that are renewable on a year-to-year basis and one contract that automatically renewed in 2016 for a successive one year term, and one to be renewed in 2018. In accordance with the requirement of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104, the Company recognizes revenue when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists (contracts); (2) delivery has occurred (monthly); (3) the seller’s price is fixed or determinable (per the customer’s contract, and services performed); and (4) collectability is reasonably assured (based upon our credit policy).

 

Revenue is accounted for under the guidelines established by SAB 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, and ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. For CTS, the Company has the following indicators of gross revenue reporting: (1) CTS is the primary obligator in the provision of services to the Hospitals under contract, (2) CTS has latitude in establishing price, and negotiating contracts with each hospital, (3) CTS negotiates and determines the service specification to be provided to each hospital client, (4) CTS has complete discretion in supplier selection, and (5) CTS has the credit risk. Accordingly, the Company records CTS revenue at gross. For SMI, PIV, PIN, and PIC, revenue is recognized on the date of service and recorded on an aggregate monthly basis.

 

Cost of Sales

 

Cost of sales includes fees paid to radiologists for reading services, transcription fees, equipment repairs, system license and usage costs.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, property, equipment, and purchased intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually.

 

Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

 

Convertible Debentures

 

Convertible debt is accounted for under ASC 470, Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options. The Company records a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) related to the issuance of convertible debt that have conversion features at fixed or adjustable rates that are in-the-money when issued and records the fair value of warrants issued with those instruments. The BCF for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds to warrants and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion features, both of which are credited to paid-in-capital. The Company calculates the fair value of warrants issued with the convertible instruments using the Binomial Option Pricing Model valuation method, using the same assumptions used for valuing employee options for purposes of following ASC Topic 718, except that the contractual life of the warrant is used. Under these guidelines, the Company allocates the value of the proceeds received from a convertible debt transaction between the conversion feature and any other detachable instruments (such as warrants) on a relative fair value basis. The allocated fair value is recorded as a debt discount or premium and is amortized over the expected term of the convertible debt to interest expense. For a conversion price change of a convertible debt issue, the additional intrinsic value of the debt conversion feature, calculated as the number of additional shares issuable due to a conversion price change multiplied by the previous conversion price, is recorded as additional debt discount and amortized over the remaining life of the debt.

 

The Company accounts for modifications of its Embedded Conversion Features in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt – Modifications and Exchanges, which requires the modification of a convertible debt instrument that changes the fair value of an embedded conversion feature and the subsequent recognition of interest expense or the associated debt instrument when the modification does not result in a debt extinguishment pursuant to ASC 470-50-40, Debt – Modification and Exchanges – Extinguishment of Debt.

 

Stock Based Compensation

 

The Company follows ASC 718, Stock Compensation; a fair value calculation is performed by the Company to establish the “grant date fair value” of each award which will also be the amount recorded by the Company as stock based compensation expense pursuant to the guidance set forth in ASC 718 to produce an estimated fair value.

 

The Company measures all share-based payments to employees (which includes non-employee Board of Directors), including employee stock options, warrants and restricted stock, at the fair value of the award and expenses it over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period). The fair value of common stock options or warrants granted to employees is estimated at the date of grant using the binomial option pricing model (“BOPM”). The calculation also takes into account the common stock fair market value at the grant date, the exercise price, the expected life of the common stock option or warrant, the dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate.

 

The Company from time to time may issue stock options, warrants and restricted stock to acquire goods or services from third parties. Restricted stock, options or warrants issued to other than employees or directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value. The options or warrants are valued using the BOPM on the basis of the market price of the underlying equity instrument on the “valuation date,” which for options and warrants related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to non-performance, is the date of the contract, and for all other contracts is the vesting date. Expenses related to the options and warrants are recognized on a straight-line basis over the period which services are to be received.

 

There was no stock-based compensation expense to non-employees for the three months ended September 30, 2017, and 2016.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized stock based compensation expenses from stock granted to employees of $23,750 and $0, respectively.

 

There was no stock-based compensation expense to non-employees for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and 2016.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of $8,500 from stock options and $30,600 from stock granted to employees. The options were valued using the BOPM and included in the labor operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized stock based compensation expenses from stock granted to employees of $5,000.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a forced sale or liquidation.

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes and loans payable approximate fair value due to their most maturities.

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company follows ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by ASC 820 are described below:

 

Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

 

Level 2 pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

 

Level 3 pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

 

The Company does not have assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The Company’s functional currency for its wholly-owned subsidiary, CTS, is the Canadian dollar, and their financial statements have been translated into U.S. dollars. The Canadian dollar based accounts of the Company’s foreign operations have been translated into United States dollars using the current rate method. Assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated using the weighted average exchange rates for the reporting period. Translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

 

The Company recognized a foreign currency gain (loss) on transactions from operations of $(11,438) for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $(595) for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

 

The Company recognized other comprehensive income (loss) of $(12,495) for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $28,738 for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

 

The Company recognized a foreign currency gain (loss) on transactions from operations of $(74,140) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $(39,846) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

 

The Company recognized other comprehensive income (loss) of $42,317 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $96,917 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. This statement prescribes the use of the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

 

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

 

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 260, Earnings per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic and diluted losses per share are the same as all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive.

 

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and other commitments to issue common stock were exercised or equity awards vest resulting in the issuance of common stock or conversion of notes into shares of the Company’s common stock that could increase the number of shares outstanding and lower the earnings per share of the Company’s common stock. This calculation is not done for periods in a loss position as this would be antidilutive.

 

Recent Accounting Updates

 

The Company does not expect the adoption of any recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flow.