XML 44 R52.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
REGULATORY MATTERS (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Banking and Thrift [Abstract]  
Schedule of Regulatory Capital Requirements
                           
   
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
 
   
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
   
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2012
                         
Total capital
 
$
209,085
   
18.18
%
$
92,018
   
≥ 8.00
%
(to risk weighted assets)
                         
Tier I capital
 
$
194,659
   
16.92
%
$
46,009
   
≥ 4.00
%
(to risk weighted assets)
                         
Tier I capital
 
$
194,659
   
10.19
%
$
76,425
   
≥ 4.00
%
(to average assets)
                         


 
   
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
 
   
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
   
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2011
                         
Total capital
 
$
194,694
   
17.32
%
$
89,924
   
≥ 8.00
%
(to risk weighted assets)
                         
Tier I capital
 
$
180,597
   
16.07
%
$
44,962
   
≥ 4.00
%
(to risk weighted assets)
                         
Tier I capital
 
$
180,597
   
10.33
%
$
69,906
   
≥ 4.00
%
(to average assets)
                         
 
Common stockholders are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefor, subject to the restrictions set forth in the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL. The DGCL provides that a corporation may declare and pay dividends out of any surplus, and, if it has no surplus, out of any net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend was declared or for the preceding fiscal year (provided that the payment will not reduce capital to an amount less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets). In addition, First California may not pay dividends on its capital stock if it is in default or has elected to defer payments of interest under its junior subordinated debentures.
 
The Bank is also subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum requirements can initiate certain mandatory — and possibly additional discretionary — actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on a company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
 
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of Total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2012, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
 
As of December 31, 2012, the Bank was categorized as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum Total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, and Tier 1 leverage capital ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since December 31, 2012 that management believes may have changed the Bank’s category.
 
The following tables present the capital amounts and ratios of the Bank with a comparison to the minimum ratios for the periods indicated:
                                       
   
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy
Purposes
 
To be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provision
 
   
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
   
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2012
                                     
Total capital
 
$
208,822
   
18.14
%
$
92,072
   
≥ 8.00
%
$
115,090
   
≥ 10.00
%
(to risk weighted assets)
                                     
Tier I capital
 
$
194,388
   
16.89
%
$
46,036
   
≥ 4.00
%
$
69,054
   
≥ 6.00
%
(to risk weighted assets)
                                     
Tier I capital
 
$
194,388
   
10.18
%
$
76,411
   
≥ 4.00
%
$
95,514
   
≥ 5.00
%
(to average assets)
                                     



   
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy
Purposes
 
To be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provision
 
   
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
   
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2011
                                     
Total capital
 
$
192,227
   
17.10
%
$
89,944
   
≥ 8.00
%
$
112,430
   
≥ 10.00
%
(to risk weighted assets)
                                     
Tier I capital
 
$
178,126
   
15.84
%
$
44,972
   
≥ 4.00
%
$
67,458
   
≥ 6.00
%
(to risk weighted assets)
                                     
Tier I capital
 
$
178,126
   
10.18
%
$
69,968
   
≥ 4.00
%
$
87,460
   
≥ 5.00
%
(to average assets)