XML 78 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Apr. 30, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies  
Commitments and Contingencies

12.   Commitments and Contingencies

  • Commitments

        The Company's operations are conducted in leased facilities. Following is a summary of non-cancelable operating lease commitments:

 
  Year ending
April 30
 
 
  (In thousands)
 

2014

  $ 4,324  

2015

    2,952  

2016

    1,919  

2017

    856  

2018

    137  

Thereafter

     
       

 

  $ 10,188  
       

        Rental expense under operating leases was approximately $4,349,000, $3,995,000 and $3,812,000 for the years ended April 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

  • Contingencies

        The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise out of the ordinary course of its business. Although adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company, in consultation with legal counsel, believes that the final disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

  • Contract Cost Audits

        Payments to the Company on government cost reimbursable contracts are based on provisional, or estimated indirect rates, which are subject to an annual audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, or DCAA. The cost audits result in the negotiation and determination of the final indirect cost rates that the Company may use for the period(s) audited. The final rates, if different from the provisional rates, may create an additional receivable or liability for the Company.

        For example, during the course of its audits, the DCAA may question the Company's incurred costs, and if the DCAA believes the Company has accounted for such costs in a manner inconsistent with the requirements under Federal Acquisition Regulations, or FAR, the DCAA auditor may recommend to the Company's administrative contracting officer to disallow such costs. Historically, the Company has not experienced material disallowed costs as a result of government audits. However, the Company can provide no assurance that the DCAA or other government audits will not result in material disallowances for incurred costs in the future.

        The Company's revenue recognition policy calls for revenue recognized on all cost reimbursable government contracts to be recorded at actual rates unless collectability is not reasonably assured.