XML 26 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Intangible assets, in-process research and development
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Intangible assets and in-process research and development [Abstract]  
Intangible assets, in-process research and development
5. Intangible assets and in-process research and development

As of June 30, 2016, $41.8 million of IPR&D assets related to the Company's otlertuzumab product candidate is included in the Aptevo segment.

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

  
Biodefense
  
Aptevo
    
(in thousands) 
 
Segment
  
Segment
  
Total
 
Cost basis
         
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
55,790
  
$
20,809
  
$
76,599
 
Additions
  
-
   
-
   
-
 
Balance at June 30, 2016
 
$
55,790
  
$
20,809
  
$
76,599
 
             
Accumulated amortization
            
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
(15,857
)
 
$
(3,368
)
 
$
(19,225
)
Amortization
  
(3,557
)
  
(1,172
)
  
(4,729
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
 
$
(19,414
)
 
$
(4,540
)
 
$
(23,954
)
             
Net balance at June 30, 2016
 
$
36,376
  
$
16,269
  
$
52,645
 

Amortization expense consisted of the following:

  
Three Months Ended June 30,
  
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(in thousands) 
 
2016
  
2015
  
2016
  
2015
 
             
Biodefense segment
 
$
1,778
  
$
2,014
  
$
3,557
  
$
3,777
 
Aptevo segment
  
587
   
378
   
1,172
   
757
 
Total amortization expense
 
$
2,365
  
$
2,392
  
$
4,729
  
$
4,534
 

As of June 30, 2016, the weighted average amortization period remaining for intangible assets in the Biodefense and Aptevo segments was 81 and 91 months, respectively.

In July 2016, the Company determined the pending spin-off of Aptevo was a potential indicator of impairment for the definite-lived intangible assets, in-process research and development indefinite-lived intangible assets and the goodwill within the Aptevo reporting unit. The Company completed an undiscounted cash flow recoverability test for the definite-lived intangibles and qualitative assessments for the indefinite-lived intangible assets, as well as the reporting unit and concluded that there was no impairment.