XML 41 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
March 2013 and March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisitions
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
March 2013 and March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisitions  
March 2013 and March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisitions

2.  March 2013 and March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisitions

 

In March 2013, we acquired from Exterran Holdings contract operations customer service agreements with 50 customers and a fleet of 363 compressor units used to provide compression services under those agreements, comprising approximately 256,000 horsepower, or 8% (by then available horsepower) of the combined U.S. contract operations business of Exterran Holdings and us (the “March 2013 Contract Operations Acquisition”). The acquired assets also included 204 compressor units, comprising approximately 99,000 horsepower, previously leased from Exterran Holdings to us and contracts relating to approximately 6,000 horsepower of compressor units we already owned and previously leased to Exterran Holdings. At the acquisition date, the acquired fleet assets had a net book value of $158.5 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $94.9 million. Total consideration for the transaction was approximately $174.0 million, excluding transaction costs. In connection with this acquisition, we issued approximately 7.1 million common units and approximately 145,000 general partner units to Exterran Holdings’ wholly-owned subsidiaries.

 

In connection with this acquisition, we were allocated $3.1 million finite life intangible assets associated with customer relationships of Exterran Holdings’ North America contract operations segment. The amounts allocated were based on the ratio of fair value of the net assets transferred to us to the total fair value of Exterran Holdings’ North America contract operations segment. These intangible assets are being amortized through 2024, based on the present value of income expected to be realized from these intangible assets.

 

In March 2012, we acquired from Exterran Holdings contract operations customer service agreements with 39 customers and a fleet of 406 compressor units used to provide compression services under those agreements, comprising approximately 188,000 horsepower, or 5% (by then available horsepower) of the combined U.S. contract operations business of Exterran Holdings and us (the “March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisition”). The acquired assets also included 139 compressor units, comprising approximately 75,000 horsepower, previously leased from Exterran Holdings to us, and a natural gas processing plant with a capacity of 10 million cubic feet per day that we used to provide processing services. At the acquisition date, the acquired fleet assets had a net book value of $149.5 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $67.0 million. Total consideration for the transaction was approximately $182.8 million, excluding transaction costs. In connection with this acquisition, we assumed $105.4 million of Exterran Holdings’ long-term debt and paid $77.4 million in cash to Exterran Holdings.

 

In connection with this acquisition, we were allocated $5.0 million finite life intangible assets associated with customer relationships of Exterran Holdings’ North America contract operations segment. The amounts allocated were based on the ratio of fair value of the net assets transferred to us to the total fair value of Exterran Holdings’ North America contract operations segment. These intangible assets are being amortized through 2024, based on the present value of income expected to be realized from these intangible assets.

 

Because Exterran Holdings and we are considered entities under common control, GAAP requires that we record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Exterran Holdings in connection with the March 2013 Contract Operations Acquisition and the March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisition using Exterran Holdings’ historical cost basis in the assets and liabilities. The difference between the historical cost basis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the purchase price is treated as either a capital contribution or distribution. As a result, we recorded capital distributions of $12.4 million and $28.2 million for the March 2013 Contract Operations Acquisition and the March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisition, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

An acquisition of a business from an entity under common control is generally accounted for under GAAP by the acquirer with retroactive application as if the acquisition date was the beginning of the earliest period included in the financial statements. Retroactive effect to the March 2013 Contract Operations Acquisition and the March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisition was impracticable because such retroactive application would have required significant assumptions in a prior period that cannot be substantiated. Accordingly, our financial statements include the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, revenue and direct operating expenses associated with the acquisition beginning on the date of such acquisition. However, the preparation of pro forma financial information allows for certain assumptions that do not meet the standards of financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.

 

Pro Forma Financial Information

 

Pro forma financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 has been included to give effect to the additional assets acquired in the March 2013 Contract Operations Acquisition and the March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisition. The March 2013 Contract Operations Acquisition and the March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisition are presented in the pro forma financial information as though both transactions occurred as of January 1, 2012. The pro forma financial information reflects the following transactions:

 

As related to the March 2013 Contract Operations Acquisition:

 

·                      our acquisition in March 2013 of certain contract operations customer service agreements and compression equipment from Exterran Holdings; and

 

·                       our issuance of approximately 7.1 million common units and approximately 145,000 general partner units to Exterran Holdings’ wholly-owned subsidiaries.

 

As related to the March 2012 Contract Operations Acquisition:

 

·                       our acquisition in March 2012 of certain contract operations customer service agreements, compression equipment and a natural gas processing plant from Exterran Holdings;

 

·                       our assumption of $105.4 million of Exterran Holdings’ long-term debt; and

 

·                       our payment of $77.4 million in cash to Exterran Holdings.

 

The pro forma financial information below is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of our results of operations that would have occurred had each transaction been consummated at the beginning of the period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results. The pro forma consolidated financial information below was derived by adjusting our historical financial statements.

 

The following table shows pro forma financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 (in thousands, except per unit amounts):

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Revenue

 

$

108,865

 

$

243,860

 

$

216,798

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(15,541

)

$

46,772

 

$

(6,024

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit

 

$

(0.33

)

$

0.87

 

$

(0.18

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

 

$

(0.33

)

$

0.87

 

$

(0.18

)

 

Pro forma net income (loss) per common unit is determined by dividing the pro forma net income (loss) that would have been allocated to our common unitholders by the weighted average number of common units outstanding after the completion of the transactions included in the pro forma consolidated financial statements. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, to the extent that the quarterly distributions exceed certain targets, our general partner is entitled to receive certain incentive distributions that will result in more net income (loss) proportionately being allocated to our general partner than to our common unitholders. The pro forma net income (loss) per limited partner unit calculations reflect pro forma incentive distributions to our general partner. There was no additional pro forma reduction of net income allocable to our limited partners, including the amount of additional incentive distributions that would have occurred, for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The pro forma net income (loss) per limited partner unit calculations reflect pro forma incentive distributions to our general partner, including an additional pro forma reduction of net income (loss) allocable to our limited partners of approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, which include the amount of additional incentive distributions that would have occurred during the period.