XML 38 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1.  Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Organization

 

Exterran Partners, L.P., together with its subsidiaries (“we” or the “Partnership”), is a publicly held Delaware limited partnership formed on June 22, 2006 to acquire certain contract operations customer service agreements and a compressor fleet used to provide compression services under those agreements. As of December 31, 2012, public unitholders held a 69% ownership interest in us and Exterran Holdings, Inc. (individually, and together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, “Exterran Holdings”) owned our remaining equity interests, including the general partner interests and all of our incentive distribution rights.

 

Exterran General Partner, L.P. is our general partner and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Exterran Holdings. As Exterran General Partner, L.P. is a limited partnership, its general partner, Exterran GP LLC, conducts our business and operations, and the board of directors and officers of Exterran GP LLC make decisions on our behalf.

 

Nature of Operations

 

Natural gas compression is a mechanical process whereby the pressure of a volume of natural gas is increased to a desired higher pressure for transportation from one point to another, and is essential to the production and transportation of natural gas. Compression is typically required several times during the natural gas production and transportation cycle, including: (i) at the wellhead; (ii) throughout gathering and distribution systems; (iii) into and out of processing and storage facilities; and (iv) along intrastate and interstate pipelines.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include us and our subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”) (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, as well as the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Because of the inherent uncertainties in this process, actual future results could differ from those expected at the reporting date. Management believes that the estimates and assumptions used are reasonable.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue from contract operations is recorded when earned, which generally occurs monthly when service is provided under our customer contracts.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. We believe that the credit risk in cash investments that we have with financial institutions is minimal. Trade accounts receivable are due from companies of varying size engaged principally in oil and natural gas activities. We review the financial condition of customers prior to extending credit and generally do not obtain collateral for trade receivables. Payment terms are on a short-term basis and in accordance with industry practice. We consider this credit risk to be limited due to these companies’ financial resources, the nature of services we provide and the terms of our contract operations customer service agreements.

 

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from our customers’ inability to make required payments. The determination of the collectibility of amounts due from our customers requires us to use estimates and make judgments regarding future events and trends, including monitoring our customers’ payment history and current creditworthiness to determine that collectibility is reasonably assured, as well as consideration of the overall business climate in which our customers operate. Inherently, these uncertainties require us to make judgments and estimates regarding our customers’ ability to pay amounts due to us in order to determine the appropriate amount of valuation allowances required for doubtful accounts. We review the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts quarterly. We determine the allowance needed based on historical write-off experience and by evaluating significant balances aged greater than 90 days individually for collectibility. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded bad debt expense of $0.5 million, $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively. No customer individually accounted for 10% or more of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost. Depreciation for financial reporting purposes is computed on the straight-line basis using estimated useful lives. For compression equipment, depreciation begins with the first compression service. The estimated useful lives for compression equipment as of December 31, 2012 were 15 to 30 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Overhauls and major improvements that increase the value or extend the life of compressor units are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of up to seven years. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $85.5 million, $65.9 million and $51.1 million, respectively.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

We review for impairment of our long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and identifiable intangibles that are being amortized, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss exists when estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. The impairment loss recognized represents the excess of the asset’s carrying value as compared to its estimated fair value. Identifiable intangibles are amortized over the assets’ estimated useful lives.

 

Intangible and Other Assets

 

Intangible assets and deferred financing costs consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Gross Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Gross Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Deferred financing costs

 

$

7,837

 

$

(3,033

)

$

6,828

 

$

(1,527

)

Customer - related (13-18 year life)

 

25,083

 

(5,926

)

20,078

 

(3,193

)

Contract based (7-9 year life)

 

1,210

 

(1,175

)

1,210

 

(1,125

)

Intangible assets and deferred financing costs

 

$

34,130

 

$

(10,134

)

$

28,116

 

$

(5,845

)

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs totaled $1.5 million, $1.3 million and $1.2 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and is recorded to interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations. Amortization expense for finite life intangible assets totaled $2.8 million, $2.0 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Estimated future intangible amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):

 

2013

 

$

2,631

 

2014

 

2,377

 

2015

 

2,146

 

2016

 

1,936

 

2017

 

1,745

 

Thereafter

 

8,357

 

Total

 

$

19,192

 

 

Due To/From Affiliates, Net

 

We have receivables and payables with Exterran Holdings. A valid right of offset exists related to the receivables and payables with these affiliates and as a result, we present such amounts on a net basis on our consolidated balance sheets.

 

The transactions reflected in due to/from affiliates, net primarily consist of centralized cash management activities between us and Exterran Holdings. Because these balances are treated as short-term borrowings between us and Exterran Holdings, serve as a financing and cash management tool to meet our short-term operating needs, are large, turn over quickly and are payable on demand, we present borrowings and repayments with our affiliates on a net basis within the consolidated statements of cash flows. Net receivables from our affiliates are considered advances and changes are presented as investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Net payables due to our affiliates are considered borrowings and changes are presented as financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

Income Taxes

 

As a partnership, all income, gains, losses, expenses, deductions and tax credits generated by us generally flow through to our unitholders. However, some states impose an entity-level income tax on partnerships, including us. We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

We record uncertain tax positions in accordance with the accounting standard on income taxes under a two-step process whereby (1) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.

 

Segment Reporting

 

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 280, “Segment Reporting,” establishes standards for entities to report information about the operating segments and geographic areas in which they operate. We only operate in one segment and all of our operations are located in the U.S.

 

Financial Instruments

 

Our financial instruments consist of cash, trade receivables and payables, interest rate swaps and long-term debt. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments approximated their carrying values as reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of our long-term debt has been estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates offered on loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality, which are Level 3 inputs. See Note 9 for additional information regarding the fair value hierarchy. A summary of the fair value and carrying value of our long-term debt as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is shown in the table below (in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Long-term debt

 

$

680,500

 

$

691,000

 

$

545,500

 

$

556,000

 

 

Hedging and Uses of Derivative Instruments

 

We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with financial activities by managing our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our debt obligations. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. We record interest rate swaps on the balance sheet as either derivative assets or derivative liabilities measured at their fair value. The fair value of our derivatives is estimated using a combination of the market and income approach. Changes in the fair value of the swaps designated as cash flow hedges are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss to the extent the contracts are effective as hedges until settlement of the underlying hedged transaction. To qualify for hedge accounting treatment, we must formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of the transactions. If the necessary correlation ceases to exist or if the anticipated transaction becomes improbable, we would discontinue hedge accounting and apply mark-to-market accounting. Amounts paid or received from interest rate swap agreements are charged or credited to interest expense and matched with the cash flows and interest expense of the debt being hedged, resulting in an adjustment to the effective interest rate.

 

Earnings Per Common and Subordinated Unit

 

The computations of earnings per common and subordinated unit are based on the weighted average number of common and subordinated units, respectively, outstanding during the applicable period. Our subordinated units meet the definition of a participating security and therefore we are required to use the two-class method in the computation of earnings per unit. Basic earnings per common and subordinated unit are determined by dividing net income allocated to the common and subordinated units, respectively, after deducting the amount allocated to our general partner (including distributions to our general partner on its incentive distribution rights), by the weighted average number of outstanding common and subordinated units, respectively, during the period.

 

When computing earnings per common and subordinated unit under the two-class method in periods when distributions are greater than earnings, the amount of the incentive distribution rights, if any, is deducted from net income and allocated to our general partner for the corresponding period. The remaining amount of net income, after deducting the incentive distribution rights, is allocated between the general partner, common and subordinated units based on how our partnership agreement allocates net losses.

 

When computing earnings per common and subordinated unit under the two-class method in periods when earnings are greater than distributions, earnings are allocated to the general partner, common and subordinated units based on how our partnership agreement would allocate earnings if the full amount of earnings for the period had been distributed. This allocation of net income does not impact our total net income, consolidated results of operations or total cash distributions; however, it may result in our general partner being allocated additional incentive distributions for purposes of our earnings per unit calculation, which could reduce net income per common and subordinated unit. However, as required by our partnership agreement, we determine cash distributions based on available cash and determine the actual incentive distributions allocable to our general partner based on actual distributions.

 

In November 2011, all remaining subordinated units outstanding converted into common units. As a result, for periods subsequent to 2011, there will not be a computation of basic and diluted earnings per subordinated unit.

 

The potentially dilutive securities issued by us include phantom units, which do not require an adjustment to the amount of net income (loss) used for computing dilutive earnings (loss) per common unit. The table below indicates the potential common units that were included in computing diluted earnings (loss) per common unit (in thousands):

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Weighted average common units outstanding — used in basic earnings (loss) per common unit

 

41,371

 

31,390

 

21,360

 

Net dilutive potential common units issuable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phantom units

 

11

 

13

 

**

 

Weighted average common units and dilutive potential common units — used in diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

 

41,382

 

31,403

 

21,360

 

 

 

** Excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per common unit as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

 

The table below indicates the potential number of common units excluded from computing diluted earnings (loss) per common unit as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Net dilutive potential common units issuable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phantom units

 

 

3

 

19

 

Net dilutive potential common units issuable

 

 

3

 

19