YAVY-9.30.12_10Q
US Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d)
Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2012
Commission File Number 000-52099
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant specified in its charter)
|
| | |
North Carolina | | 20-4495993 |
(State of Incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
209 North Bridge Street, Elkin, North Carolina 28621
(address of principal executive offices)
336-526-6300
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No o
Common shares outstanding as of October 25, 2012, par value $1.00 per share, were 20,003,688.
YADKIN VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
|
| |
Part I. Financial Information | |
Item 1. Financial Statements | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
1
YADKIN VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, | | December 31, |
| 2012 | | 2011* |
| (Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
ASSETS | | | |
Cash and due from banks | $ | 26,048 |
| | $ | 40,790 |
|
Federal funds sold | 50 |
| | 50 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits | 97,124 |
| | 52,078 |
|
Securities available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost $302,718 in 2012 and $324,172 in 2011) | 310,556 |
| | 330,422 |
|
Gross loans | 1,358,868 |
| | 1,450,924 |
|
Less: allowance for loan losses | 27,231 |
| | 32,848 |
|
Net loans | 1,331,637 |
| | 1,418,076 |
|
Loans held-for-sale | 24,766 |
| | 19,534 |
|
Accrued interest receivable | 6,229 |
| | 6,745 |
|
Premises and equipment, net | 41,460 |
| | 42,120 |
|
Other real estate owned | 22,294 |
| | 24,966 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost | 4,155 |
| | 6,130 |
|
Investment in bank-owned life insurance | 26,274 |
| | 25,934 |
|
Core deposit intangible (net of accumulated amortization of $9,609 in 2012 and $8,789 in 2011) | 2,914 |
| | 3,733 |
|
Other assets | 26,871 |
| | 22,610 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 1,920,378 |
| | $ | 1,993,188 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | |
Deposits | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 256,402 |
| | $ | 229,895 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits: | | | |
NOW, savings and money market accounts | 606,220 |
| | 625,560 |
|
Time certificates: | | | |
$100 or more | 342,356 |
| | 360,388 |
|
Other | 446,482 |
| | 515,498 |
|
Total Deposits | 1,651,460 |
| | 1,731,341 |
|
| | | |
Short-term borrowings | 36,314 |
| | 39,810 |
|
Long-term borrowings | 65,985 |
| | 65,729 |
|
Capital lease obligations | 2,335 |
| | 2,365 |
|
Accrued interest payable | 1,746 |
| | 2,619 |
|
Other liabilities | 7,302 |
| | 10,738 |
|
Total Liabilities | $ | 1,765,142 |
| | $ | 1,852,602 |
|
| | | |
Shareholders' Equity | | | |
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; 49,312 issued and outstanding in 2012 and 2011 | 48,033 |
| | 47,389 |
|
Common stock, $1 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 20,003,688 issued and outstanding in 2012 and 19,526,188 issued and outstanding in 2011 | 20,004 |
| | 19,526 |
|
Warrants | 3,581 |
| | 3,581 |
|
Surplus | 117,700 |
| | 117,883 |
|
Accumulated deficit | (38,923 | ) | | (51,656 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 4,841 |
| | 3,863 |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity | 155,236 |
| | 140,586 |
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | $ | 1,920,378 |
| | $ | 1,993,188 |
|
_______________________
| |
* | Derived from audited consolidated financial statements |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
2
YADKIN VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
INTEREST INCOME: | |
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 17,735 |
| | $ | 19,341 |
| | $ | 54,618 |
| | $ | 60,780 |
|
Interest on federal funds sold | 9 |
| | 7 |
| | 24 |
| | 22 |
|
Interest and dividends on securities: | | | | | | | |
Taxable | 1,165 |
| | 1,598 |
| | 3,797 |
| | 4,800 |
|
Non-taxable | 509 |
| | 548 |
| | 1,637 |
| | 1,709 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits | 28 |
| | 71 |
| | 103 |
| | 276 |
|
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME | 19,446 |
| | 21,565 |
| | 60,179 |
| | 67,587 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE | | | | | | | |
Time deposits of $100 or more | 1,762 |
| | 2,326 |
| | 5,667 |
| | 7,804 |
|
Other time and savings deposits | 2,018 |
| | 3,120 |
| | 6,582 |
| | 11,231 |
|
Borrowed funds | 477 |
| | 494 |
| | 1,692 |
| | 1,651 |
|
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE | 4,257 |
| | 5,940 |
| | 13,941 |
| | 20,686 |
|
NET INTEREST INCOME | 15,189 |
| | 15,625 |
| | 46,238 |
| | 46,901 |
|
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | 4,251 |
| | 1,956 |
| | 8,820 |
| | 17,216 |
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | 10,938 |
| | 13,669 |
| | 37,418 |
| | 29,685 |
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME: | | | | | | | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | 1,319 |
| | 1,464 |
| | 3,887 |
| | 3,961 |
|
Other service fees | 857 |
| | 837 |
| | 2,646 |
| | 2,582 |
|
Net gain on sale of securities | 1,348 |
| | 1,556 |
| | 1,648 |
| | 2,078 |
|
Income on investment in bank-owned life insurance | 159 |
| | 167 |
| | 473 |
| | 491 |
|
Mortgage banking activities | 1,599 |
| | 1,183 |
| | 4,412 |
| | 4,442 |
|
Other than temporary impairment of securities | — |
| | (74 | ) | | — |
| | (116 | ) |
Loss on sale of loans | (900 | ) | | — |
| | (900 | ) | | — |
|
Other income | 283 |
| | 90 |
| | 415 |
| | 333 |
|
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME | 4,665 |
| | 5,223 |
| | 12,581 |
| | 13,771 |
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES: | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | 6,914 |
| | 6,073 |
| | 19,378 |
| | 21,402 |
|
Occupancy and equipment expense | 1,794 |
| | 1,961 |
| | 5,436 |
| | 6,461 |
|
Printing and supplies | 168 |
| | 141 |
| | 463 |
| | 478 |
|
Data processing | 456 |
| | 404 |
| | 1,295 |
| | 1,158 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible | 266 |
| | 289 |
| | 820 |
| | 892 |
|
Communications | 314 |
| | 372 |
| | 1,019 |
| | 1,291 |
|
FDIC assessment | 650 |
| | 79 |
| | 2,004 |
| | 2,757 |
|
Loan collection fees | 69 |
| | 379 |
| | 510 |
| | 1,285 |
|
Other professional fees | 491 |
| | 218 |
| | 1,276 |
| | 830 |
|
Net cost of operation of other real estate owned | 1,322 |
| | 759 |
| | 5,295 |
| | 3,982 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of premises and equipment | — |
| | 286 |
| | (22 | ) | | 1,481 |
|
Goodwill impairment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,944 |
|
Other | 2,348 |
| | 1,868 |
| | 6,628 |
| | 6,910 |
|
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSES | 14,792 |
| | 12,829 |
| | 44,102 |
| | 53,871 |
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 811 |
| | 6,063 |
| | 5,897 |
| | (10,415 | ) |
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) | 54 |
| | 2,384 |
| | (9,329 | ) | | 6,905 |
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) | 757 |
| | 3,679 |
| | 15,226 |
| | (17,320 | ) |
Preferred stock dividend and accretion of preferred stock discount | 838 |
| | 771 |
| | 2,493 |
| | 2,216 |
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS | $ | (81 | ) | | $ | 2,908 |
| | $ | 12,733 |
| | $ | (19,536 | ) |
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.15 |
| | 0.66 |
| | $ | (1.09 | ) |
Diluted | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.15 |
| | 0.66 |
| | $ | (1.09 | ) |
CASH DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
3
YADKIN VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPRENHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| (Amounts in thousands) | | (Amounts in thousands) |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 757 |
| | $ | 3,679 |
| | $ | 15,226 |
| | $ | (17,320 | ) |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME: | | | | | | | |
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale | 1,975 |
| | 3,234 |
| | 3,239 |
| | 7,338 |
|
Tax effect | (760 | ) | | (1,245 | ) | | (1,247 | ) | | (2,825 | ) |
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax amount | 1,215 |
| | 1,989 |
| | 1,992 |
| | 4,513 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains | (1,348 | ) | | (1,556 | ) | | (1,648 | ) | | (1,998 | ) |
Tax effect | 519 |
| | 599 |
| | 634 |
| | 769 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains, net of tax amount | (829 | ) | | (957 | ) | | (1,014 | ) | | (1,229 | ) |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX | 386 |
| | 1,032 |
| | 978 |
| | 3,284 |
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 1,143 |
| | $ | 4,711 |
| | $ | 16,204 |
| | $ | (14,036 | ) |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
4
YADKIN VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Other | | Total |
| Common Stock | | Preferred | | | | | | Accumulated | | Comprehensive | | Shareholders' |
| Shares | | Amount | | Stock | | Warrants | | Surplus | | Deficit | | Income | | Equity |
| (Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2010 | 16,147,640 |
| | $ | 16,148 |
| | $ | 46,770 |
| | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | 114,649 |
| | $ | (34,273 | ) | | $ | 582 |
| | $ | 147,457 |
|
Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (17,320 | ) | | — |
| | (17,320 | ) |
Issuance of common stock | 3,233,548 |
| | 3,233 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,169 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,402 |
|
Restricted stock issued (forfeited) | 145,000 |
| | 145 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (145 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Discount accretion on preferred stock | — |
| | — |
| | 465 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (465 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Share based compensation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
stock options | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 58 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 58 |
|
restricted stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 86 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 86 |
|
Preferred stock dividends | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,751 | ) | | — |
| | (1,751 | ) |
Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,284 |
| | 3,284 |
|
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 | 19,526,188 |
| | $ | 19,526 |
| | $ | 47,235 |
| | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | 117,817 |
| | $ | (53,809 | ) | | $ | 3,866 |
| | $ | 138,216 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2011 | 19,526,188 |
| | $ | 19,526 |
| | $ | 47,389 |
| | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | 117,883 |
| | $ | (51,656 | ) | | $ | 3,863 |
| | $ | 140,586 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,226 |
| | — |
| | 15,226 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock | 497,500 |
| | 498 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (498 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Restricted stock issued (forfeited) | (20,000 | ) | | (20 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 20 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Discount accretion on preferred stock | — |
| | — |
| | 644 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (644 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Share based compensation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
stock options | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23 |
|
restricted stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 272 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 272 |
|
Preferred stock dividends | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,849 | ) | | — |
| | (1,849 | ) |
Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 978 |
| | 978 |
|
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 | 20,003,688 |
| | $ | 20,004 |
| | $ | 48,033 |
| | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | 117,700 |
| | $ | (38,923 | ) | | $ | 4,841 |
| | $ | 155,236 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
5
YADKIN VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |
Net income (loss) | $ | 15,226 |
| | $ | (17,320 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Net amortization of premiums on investment securities | 5,545 |
| | 3,483 |
|
Provision for loan losses | 8,820 |
| | 17,216 |
|
Loss on sales of loans held-for-sale | 900 |
| | — |
|
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans | (2,309 | ) | | (3,201 | ) |
Other than temporary impairment of investments | — |
| | 116 |
|
Impairment of goodwill | — |
| | 4,944 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance | (473 | ) | | (491 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | 2,028 |
| | 2,149 |
|
(Gain) loss on sales and impairment of premises and equipment | (22 | ) | | 1,481 |
|
Net losses on sale and write downs of other real estate owned | 4,595 |
| | 2,891 |
|
Gain on sale of securities | (1,648 | ) | | (2,078 | ) |
Amortization of core deposit intangible | 820 |
| | 892 |
|
Deferred tax provision | (8,987 | ) | | 5,279 |
|
Stock based compensation expense | 295 |
| | 144 |
|
Originations of mortgage loans held-for-sale | (100,516 | ) | | (407,551 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans | 108,393 |
| | 447,370 |
|
Decrease in capital lease obligations | (67 | ) | | (28 | ) |
Decrease in accrued interest receivable | 515 |
| | 1,500 |
|
Decrease in other assets | 4,246 |
| | 6,224 |
|
Decrease in accrued interest payable | (873 | ) | | (621 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | (1,435 | ) | | 45 |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | 35,053 |
| | 62,444 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Purchases of available-for-sale securities | (73,767 | ) | | (110,103 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities | 35,444 |
| | 89,111 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities | 55,883 |
| | 29,930 |
|
Net decrease in loans | 52,550 |
| | 94,863 |
|
Proceeds from the redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 1,975 |
| | 2,411 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment | (1,383 | ) | | (2,823 | ) |
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment | 37 |
| | 106 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned | 11,446 |
| | 12,165 |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES | 82,185 |
| | 115,660 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Net increase in checking, NOW, money market and savings accounts | 7,167 |
| | 37,799 |
|
Net decrease in time certificates | (87,048 | ) | | (274,093 | ) |
Net decrease in borrowed funds | (3,240 | ) | | (8,459 | ) |
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock | — |
| | 6,402 |
|
Preferred dividends paid | (3,813 | ) | | (616 | ) |
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES | (86,934 | ) | | (238,967 | ) |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
YADKIN VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
| |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | $ | 30,304 |
| | $ | (60,863 | ) |
| | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: | | | |
Beginning of year | 92,918 |
| | 229,780 |
|
End of year | $ | 123,222 |
| | $ | 168,917 |
|
| | | |
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | |
Cash paid for interest | $ | 18,317 |
| | $ | 21,285 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | — |
| | $ | 26 |
|
| | | |
SUPPLEMENT DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Transfer from loans to foreclosed real estate | $ | 13,369 |
| | $ | 10,781 |
|
Unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax effect | $ | 1,992 |
| | $ | 4,513 |
|
| | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
6
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation (the "Company") and its subsidiary, Yadkin Valley Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"). On July 1, 2006, the Bank became a subsidiary of the Company through a one for one share exchange of the then outstanding 10,648,300 shares. Sidus Financial, LLC (“Sidus”) is a single member limited liability company with the Bank as its single member. Sidus offers mortgage banking services and is headquartered in Greensboro, NC. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial statements and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. Because the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP, they should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included with the Company's 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "2011 Form 10-K") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 29, 2012. Operating results, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the year or other interim periods.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all the adjustments, all of which are normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The accounting policies followed are set forth in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's 2011 Form 10-K.
Mortgage Banking Activities - During the second quarter of 2012, a decision was made by management to make a change in how the Company's mortgage activities are reported based on the prior year reorganization of the Bank's mortgage division and Sidus. This decision was made to improve overall reporting of its mortgage banking activities which are now analyzed and reviewed as a separate and distinct business segment. This change in reporting segment combines both mortgage activities of the Bank with mortgage activities that were previously reported separately from mortgage activities provided by Sidus.
Mortgage banking activity income includes gains on sale of mortgage loans made with the intent to sell, revenue from the fair value gains and losses recognized on interest rate lock commitments and forward sales commitments, direct costs related to the gain of mortgage loans, and costs related to representations and warranties and other obligations incurred in the sales of mortgage loans. Also included in mortgage banking activity income is all servicing income earned in connection with servicing activities and mortgage servicing rights valuation adjustments. When the Bank retains the right to service a sold mortgage loan, the previous carrying amount is allocated between the loan sold and the retained mortgage servicing right based on their relative fair values on the date of transfer. The Bank uses the fair value method of accounting for mortgage servicing rights. Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial assets.
Reclassifications - Certain income and expenses reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation of mortgage banking activity income. Reclassifications include interest income which was previously presented in other income, commission expenses recorded in salaries that are now recorded as a reduction in mortgage banking activity income, and other miscellaneous expenses previously recorded in other expenses that have been reclassified as a reduction to mortgage banking activity income. In addition, gains on sale of mortgage loans has been reclassified to be reported with mortgage banking income to provide a combined overview of the mortgage banking activity segment. The reclassifications had no effect on net income (loss) or shareholders' equity, as previously reported.
2. New Accounting Standards
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 "Fair Value Measurement Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements" ("ASU 2011-04"). The ASU 2011-04 amends Topic 820 to add both additional clarifications to existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and changes to existing principles and disclosure guidance. Clarifications were made to the relevancy of the highest and best use valuation concept, measurement of an instrument classified in an entity's shareholder's equity and disclosure of quantitative information about the unobservable inputs for level 3 fair value measurements. Changes to existing principles and disclosures included measurement of financial instruments
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
7
managed within a portfolio, the application of premiums and discounts in fair value measurement, and additional disclosures related to fair value measurements. The updated guidance and requirements are effective for financial statements issued for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, and the disclosure requirements were included in this Form 10-Q.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 "Presentation of Comprehensive Income" (“ASU 2011-05”). This standard eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in shareholders' equity and is intended to enhance comparability between entities that report under U.S. GAAP and those that report under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and to provide a more consistent method of presenting non-owner transactions that affect an entity's equity. ASU 2011-05 requirements are effective for public entities as of the beginning of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted, but full retrospective application is required under both sets of accounting standards. The Company has adopted the standard and the adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have an impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
3. Stock-based Compensation
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, 1,000 and 8,500 options were vested, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, 2,300 and 22,600 options were vested, respectively. At September 30, 2012, there were 11,000 options unvested and no shares available for grants of options other than shares available under the Company's 2008 Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Omnibus Plan"). Total options outstanding at September 30, 2012 were 246,967.
There were no options granted or exercised during the first three or nine months ended September 30, 2012 or 2011.
As of September 30, 2012, there are 640,500 restricted shares outstanding, of which 42,663 shares of restricted stock are vested and 597,837 shares are nonvested. There were no shares of restricted stock issued during the three months ended September 30, 2012. There were 497,500 shares of restricted stock issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 at an average fair value of $2.31, and 20,000 restricted shares were forfeited. Of the 497,500 shares issued during 2012, 490,000 were issued with performance and service conditions. These conditions are based on achieving certain earnings and credit performance standards and require a minimum of 2-years of service. During the first nine months of 2011, there were 145,000 shares of restricted stock granted at an average fair value of $2.34 per share. The fair value of each share grant is based on the closing market price of the stock on the date of issuance. There were no restricted shares granted in the third quarter of 2011.
The compensation expense related to options and restricted shares was $130,344 for the three month period ended September 30, 2012 and $294,384 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The compensation expense related to options and restricted shares was $53,728 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 and $144,101 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2012, there was $1,128,303 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under all of the Company's stock benefit plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over an average vesting period of 2.3 years.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
8
4. Investment Securities
Investment securities at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2012 |
| Amortized Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | |
Securities of U.S. government agencies due: | | | | | | | |
Within 1 year | $ | 20,008 |
| | $ | 44 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 20,052 |
|
After 1 but within 5 years | 12,779 |
| | 38 |
| | — |
| | 12,817 |
|
| 32,787 |
| | 82 |
| | — |
| | 32,869 |
|
Government sponsored agencies: | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities due: | | | | | | | |
Within 1 year | 67 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 68 |
|
After 1 but within 5 years | 490 |
| | 28 |
| | — |
| | 518 |
|
After 5 but within 10 years | 11,526 |
| | 345 |
| | — |
| | 11,871 |
|
After 10 years | 68,847 |
| | 1,972 |
| | 12 |
| | 70,807 |
|
| 80,930 |
| | 2,346 |
| | 12 |
| | 83,264 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations due: | | | | | | | |
After 1 but within 5 years | 1,743 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 1,750 |
|
After 5 but within 10 years | 10,332 |
| | 322 |
| | — |
| | 10,654 |
|
After 10 years | 124,469 |
| | 1,060 |
| | 450 |
| | 125,079 |
|
| 136,544 |
| | 1,389 |
| | 450 |
| | 137,483 |
|
Private label collateralized mortgage obligations due: | | | | | | | |
After 5 but within 10 years | 190 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | 183 |
|
After 10 years | 853 |
| | 23 |
| | — |
| | 876 |
|
| 1,043 |
| | 23 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,059 |
|
State and municipal securities due: | | | | | | | |
Within 1 year | 720 |
| | 11 |
| | — |
| | 731 |
|
After 1 but within 5 years | 5,738 |
| | 367 |
| | — |
| | 6,105 |
|
After 5 but within 10 years | 19,025 |
| | 1,648 |
| | — |
| | 20,673 |
|
After 10 years | 24,816 |
| | 2,444 |
| | — |
| | 27,260 |
|
| 50,299 |
| | 4,470 |
| | — |
| | 54,769 |
|
Common and preferred stocks: | 1,115 |
| | 42 |
| | 45 |
| | 1,112 |
|
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 302,718 |
| | $ | 8,352 |
| | $ | 514 |
| | $ | 310,556 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
9
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2011 |
| Amortized Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | |
Securities of U.S. government agencies due: | | | | | | | |
Within 1 year | $ | 9,988 |
| | $ | 51 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10,039 |
|
After 1 but within 5 years | 13,622 |
| | 65 |
| | — |
| | 13,687 |
|
| 23,610 |
| | 116 |
| | — |
| | 23,726 |
|
Government sponsored agencies: | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities due: | | | | | | | |
After 1 but within 5 years | 476 |
| | 18 |
| | — |
| | 494 |
|
After 5 but within 10 years | 3,481 |
| | 281 |
| | — |
| | 3,762 |
|
After 10 years | 60,388 |
| | 959 |
| | 393 |
| | 60,954 |
|
| 64,345 |
| | 1,258 |
| | 393 |
| | 65,210 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations due: | | | | | | | |
After 5 but within 10 years | 13,986 |
| | 478 |
| | — |
| | 14,464 |
|
After 10 years | 150,915 |
| | 1,241 |
| | 592 |
| | 151,564 |
|
| 164,901 |
| | 1,719 |
| | 592 |
| | 166,028 |
|
Private label collateralized mortgage obligations due: | | | | | | | |
After 5 but within 10 years | 275 |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | 285 |
|
After 10 years | 1,028 |
| | — |
| | 57 |
| | 971 |
|
| 1,303 |
| | 10 |
| | 57 |
| | 1,256 |
|
State and municipal securities due: | | | | | | | |
Within 1 year | 618 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 623 |
|
After 1 but within 5 years | 6,575 |
| | 347 |
| | — |
| | 6,922 |
|
After 5 but within 10 years | 21,252 |
| | 1,639 |
| | 19 |
| | 22,872 |
|
After 10 years | 40,455 |
| | 2,255 |
| | 9 |
| | 42,701 |
|
| 68,900 |
| | 4,246 |
| | 28 |
| | 73,118 |
|
Common and preferred stocks: | 1,113 |
| | 23 |
| | 52 |
| | 1,084 |
|
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 324,172 |
| | $ | 7,372 |
| | $ | 1,122 |
| | $ | 330,422 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities are included in maturity groups based upon stated maturity date. At September 30, 2012, $83.3 million of the Bank's mortgage-backed securities were pass-through securities and $138.5 million were collateralized mortgage obligations. At December 31, 2011, $65.2 million of the Bank's mortgage-backed securities were pass-through securities and $167.3 million were collateralized mortgage obligations. Actual maturity will vary based on repayment of the underlying mortgage loans.
Gross realized gains on the sale of securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Gross realized gains on the sale of securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $1,600,000 million and $2,078,000.0 million, respectively. There were no losses on the sale of securities available-for-sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 or 2011.
Investment securities with carrying values of approximately $86,037,077 and $120,227,824 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, were pledged as collateral for public deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.
The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and fair value of investment securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Securities that have been in a loss position for twelve months or more at September 30, 2012 include one mortgage backed security, one collateralized mortgage obligation and two other securities. The key factors considered in evaluating
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
10
the collateralized mortgage obligations, private label collateralized mortgage obligations, and municipal securities were cash flows of the investment and the assessment of other relative economic factors. Securities that have been in a loss position for twelve months or more at December 31, 2011 include three mortgage-backed securities, two collateralized mortgage obligations, one private label collateralized mortgage obligation and one common stock. The unrealized losses relate to securities that have incurred fair value reductions due to a shift in demand from non-governmental securities and municipals to U.S. Treasury bonds and governmental agencies due to credit market concerns. The unrealized losses are not likely to reverse until market interest rates decline to the levels that existed when the securities were purchased. None of the unrealized losses relate to the marketability of the securities or the issuer's ability to honor redemption obligations. It is not more likely than not that the Company will have to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, there were no securities available-for-sale deemed to be other than temporarily impaired (“OTTI”).
If management determines that an investment has experienced an other than temporary impairment, the loss is recognized in the income statement.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less Than 12 Months | | 12 Months or More | | Total |
September 30, 2012 | Fair value | | Unrealized losses | | Fair value | | Unrealized losses | | Fair value | | Unrealized losses |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Securities available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government sponsored agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,204 |
| | $ | 12 |
| | $ | 4,204 |
| | $ | 12 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 26,982 |
| | 198 |
| | 20,689 |
| | 252 |
| | 47,671 |
| | 450 |
|
Private label collateralized mortgage obligations | 183 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 183 |
| | 7 |
|
Common and preferred stocks | — |
| | — |
| | 66 |
| | 45 |
| | 66 |
| | 45 |
|
Total temporarily impaired securities | $ | 27,165 |
| | $ | 205 |
| | $ | 24,959 |
| | $ | 309 |
| | $ | 52,124 |
| | $ | 514 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less Than 12 Months | | 12 Months or More | | Total |
December 31, 2011 | Fair value | | Unrealized losses | | Fair value | | Unrealized losses | | Fair value | | Unrealized losses |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Securities available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government sponsored agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | $ | 13,121 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 16,751 |
| | $ | 348 |
| | $ | 29,872 |
| | $ | 393 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligation | 70,421 |
| | 505 |
| | 5,043 |
| | 87 |
| | 75,464 |
| | 592 |
|
Private label collateralized mortgage obligations | — |
| | — |
| | 971 |
| | 57 |
| | 971 |
| | 57 |
|
State and municipal securities | 3,429 |
| | 28 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,429 |
| | 28 |
|
Common and preferred stocks, and other | 6 |
| | 1 |
| | 53 |
| | 51 |
| | 59 |
| | 52 |
|
Total temporarily impaired securities | $ | 86,977 |
| | $ | 579 |
| | $ | 22,818 |
| | $ | 543 |
| | $ | 109,795 |
| | $ | 1,122 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
11
5. Non-marketable Equity Securities
The aggregate cost of the Company's cost method investments totaled $6,715,208 at September 30, 2012 and $8,771,278 at December 31, 2011. Cost method investments at September 30, 2012 include $4,154,700 in Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock and $2,560,508 of investments in various trust and financial companies, which are included in other assets. All cost method investments were evaluated for impairment at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The following factors have been considered in determining the carrying amount of FHLB stock: 1) the recoverability of the par value, 2) the Company has sufficient liquidity to meet all operational needs in the foreseeable future and would not need to dispose of the stock below recorded amounts, 3) redemptions and purchases of the stock are at the discretion of the FHLB, 4) the Company believes the FHLB has the ability to absorb economic losses given the expectation that the various FHLBs' have a high degree of government support, and 5) the unrealized losses related to securities owned by the FHLB are manageable given the capital levels of the organization. The Company estimated that the fair value equaled or exceeded the cost of these investments (that is, the investments were not impaired) as of September 30, 2012. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company's investment in a financial services company and a local community bank were considered to be other than temporarily impaired and approximately $116,003 and $73,848, respectively, was charged-off. In addition to the impairment charges recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company sold one of its investments in a financial services company for a loss of $79,910. There were no other than temporary impairments recorded for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, there are various outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit, which are not reflected in the accompanying financial statements. At September 30, 2012, the Company had commitments outstanding of $266.8 million for additional loan amounts. Commitments of Sidus, the Bank's mortgage lending subsidiary, are excluded from this amount and discussed in the paragraph below. Additional commitments totaling $7.5 million were outstanding under standby letters of credit. Management does not expect any significant losses to result from these commitments.
At September 30, 2012, Sidus had $63.3 million of commitments outstanding to originate mortgage loans held-for-sale at fixed prices and $88.0 million of forward commitments outstanding under best efforts contracts to sell mortgages to agencies and other investors. See Note 9 for additional disclosures on these derivative financial instruments.
7. Earnings Per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the reporting periods. Diluted net income available to common shareholders per common share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. The numerators of the basic net income per common share computations are the same as the numerators of the diluted net income per common share computations for all the periods presented. Weighted average shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 excludes 597,837 shares of unvested restricted stock. Weighted average shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 excludes 161,334 shares of unvested restricted stock. A reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net income per common share computations to the denominator of the diluted net income per common share computations is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, | | September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Basic EPS denominator: | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 19,389,251 |
| | 19,527,855 |
| | 19,382,649 |
| | 17,858,777 |
|
Dilutive potential common shares | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Diluted EPS denominator | 19,389,251 |
| | 19,527,855 |
| | 19,382,649 |
| | 17,858,777 |
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, net income (loss) for determining net income (loss) per common share was reported as net income (loss) less the dividend on preferred stock. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, there were 246,967 warrants and stock options that were not considered dilutive because the exercise prices exceeded the average market price per share and 596,835 shares of restricted stock not considered dilutive because they were antidilutive under the
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
12
treasury stock method or because performance and service criteria had not been met. During the quarter ended September 30, 2012 there were 1,002 shares of restricted stock that would have been considered dilutive had the Company reported net income for the period. The non-dilutive options had exercise prices ranging from $3.84 to $19.07 per share. Unvested shares of restricted stock and all other common stock equivalents were excluded from the determination of diluted earnings (loss) per share for the year-to-date period ended September 30, 2011 due to the Company's loss position for that period.
8. Shareholders' Equity
Effective October 1, 2012, North Carolina passed the Banking Modernization Act, pursuant to Section 53C-4-7 of which, the Bank, as a North Carolina banking corporation, may pay dividends if such distributions will not reduce its capital below its applicable “required capital.” The Bank's “required capital” is that amount of capital required for the Bank to be deemed “adequately capitalized” under applicable federal regulatory capital ratios. Currently, the Bank exceeds each of these federal regulatory capital ratios. However, the Bank is currently prohibited from paying dividends to the holding company without prior approval of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the North Carolina Banking Commissioner. In addition, the Company has committed to the regulators that the Bank will maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8%, which is higher than the statutory Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.00% to be classified as well-capitalized. The Company deferred dividend payments on its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series T (“Series T Preferred Stock”), and its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series T- ACB (the “Series T-ACB Preferred Stock” and together with the Series T Preferred Stock, the “TARP Preferred Stock”), and interest payments on the trust preferred securities in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2011 and the first and second quarters of 2012. However, in August 2012, the Company received regulatory approval and paid in all of the outstanding deferred dividends on the TARP Preferred Stock and all accrued but unpaid interest on the trust preferred securities payments in full, including the required payments for the third quarter of 2012. The Company is now current on its payment obligations on its Series T and Series T-ACB Preferred Stock and on the trust preferred securities.
On September 12, 2012, the U.S. Treasury completed the sale of its $36 million of Series T Preferred Stock and $13.3 million of its Series T-ACB Preferred Stock investment in the Company to private investors through a registered public offering. There was no impact to the Company's financial condition or operating results due to the transaction.
9. Derivatives
The Company currently has derivative instrument contracts consisting of interest rate swaps and interest rate lock commitments and commitments to sell mortgages. The primary objective for each of these contracts is to minimize interest rate risk. The Company's strategy is to use derivative contracts to stabilize and improve net interest margin and net interest income currently and in future periods. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. For derivatives that are economic hedges, but are not designated as hedging instruments or otherwise do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, all changes in fair value are recognized in non-interest income during the period of change.
As part of interest rate risk management, the Company has entered into two interest rate swap agreements to convert certain fixed-rate receivables to floating rates and certain fixed-rate obligations to floating rates. The interest rate swaps are used to provide fixed rate financing while managing interest rate risk and were not designated as hedges. The interest rate swaps pay and receive interest based on a floating rate based on one month LIBOR, with payments being calculated on the notional amount. The interest rate swaps are settled quarterly and mature on June 15, 2016. The interest rate swaps each had a notional amount of $2.0 million at September 30, 2012, representing the amount of fixed-rate receivables outstanding and liabilities outstanding, and are included in other assets and other liabilities at their fair value of $212,923. The Company had a gain of $334 on the interest rate swap asset and a loss of $334 on the interest rate swap liability for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The Company had a gain of $4,057 on the interest rate swap asset and a loss of $4,057 on the interest rate swap liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company had a gain of $54,211 on the interest rate swap asset and a loss of $54,211 on the interest rate swap liability for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The Company had a gain of $68,357 on the interest rate swap asset and a loss of $68,357 on the interest rate swap liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The interest rate swaps had a notional amount of $2.0 million outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and was included in other assets and other liabilities at their fair market value of $216,979. All changes in fair value are recorded as other income within non-interest income. Fair values for interest rate swap agreements are based upon the amounts required to settle the contracts.
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing mortgage origination business. Sidus, the Bank's mortgage lending subsidiary, enters into interest rate lock commitments and commitments to sell mortgages. The primary risks managed by derivative instruments are these interest rate lock commitments and forward-loan-sale commitments. Interest rate lock commitments are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the Company's fixed rate loan commitments. The period of time between the issuance of a loan commitment and the closing and sale of the loan generally ranges from 10 to 60 days. Such interest rate
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
13
lock commitments and forward-loan-sale commitments represent derivative instruments which are required to be carried at fair value. These derivative instruments do not qualify as hedges under the Derivatives and Hedging topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The fair value of the Company's interest rate lock commitments is based on the value that can be generated when the underlying loan is sold on the secondary market and is included on the balance sheet in other assets and on the income statement in mortgage banking income (loss). The fair value of the Company's forward sales commitments is based on changes in the value of the commitment, principally because of changes in interest rates, and is included on the balance sheet in other assets or other liabilities and on the income statement in mortgage banking income (loss).
At September 30, 2012, Sidus had $63.3 million of commitments outstanding to originate mortgage loans held-for-sale at fixed prices and $88 million of forward commitments outstanding for original commitments and outstanding mortgage loans held-for-sale under best efforts contracts to sell mortgages to agencies and other investors. The fair value of forward sales commitments recorded in other assets was $1,008,706 at September 30, 2012. The fair value of the interest rate lock commitments recorded in liabilities was $(491,245) at September 30, 2012. Recognition of gains related to the change in fair value of forward sales commitments were $41,610 and $330,279 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and are included in mortgage banking activities income. Recognition of gains related to the change in fair value of the interest rate lock commitments were $64,294 and $141,071 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and are included in mortgage banking activities income. Recognition of losses related to the change in fair value of the interest rate lock commitments and gains related to forward sales commitments were $56,698 and $100,565 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and are included in other income. Recognition of gains related to the change in fair value of the interest rate lock commitments and losses related to forward sales commitments were $50,398 and $86,737, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and are included in other income. At December 31, 2011, Sidus had $51.6 million of commitments outstanding to originate mortgage loans held-for-sale at fixed prices and $67.4 million of forward commitments outstanding under best efforts contracts to sell mortgages to agencies and other investors. The fair value of interest rate locks recorded in other assets was $57,363 at December 31, 2011. The fair value of the forward sales commitments recorded in other assets was $129,818 at December 31, 2011.
10. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
General. The Bank provides to its customers a full range of short- to medium-term commercial, agricultural, Small Business Administration guaranteed, mortgage, home equity, and personal loans, both secured and unsecured. The Bank also makes real estate mortgage and construction loans.
The following table presents loans at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by class:
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, | | December 31, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
| (in thousands) |
Construction and land development | $ | 147,408 |
| | $ | 202,803 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | |
Owner occupied | 346,908 |
| | 348,931 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 230,854 |
| | 242,827 |
|
Residential mortgages: | | | |
1-4 family | 174,712 |
| | 179,047 |
|
Multifamily | 37,987 |
| | 39,881 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 196,489 |
| | 201,220 |
|
Commercial | 168,510 |
| | 177,047 |
|
Consumer and other | 54,772 |
| | 58,283 |
|
Total | 1,357,640 |
| | 1,450,039 |
|
Less: Net deferred loan origination fees | 1,228 |
| | 885 |
|
Allowance for loan losses | (27,231 | ) | | (32,848 | ) |
Loans, net | $ | 1,331,637 |
| | $ | 1,418,076 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
14
Real Estate Loans. Real estate loans include construction and land development loans, commercial real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, and residential mortgages.
Commercial real estate loans totaled $577.8 million and $591.8 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. This lending has involved loans secured by owner-occupied commercial buildings for office, storage and warehouse space, as well as non-owner occupied commercial buildings. The Bank generally requires the personal guaranty of borrowers and a demonstrated cash flow capability sufficient to service the debt. Loans secured by commercial real estate may be larger in size and may involve a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Payments on such loans are often dependent on successful operation or management of the properties.
Construction/development lending totaled $147.4 million and $202.8 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Bank originates one-to-four family residential construction loans for the construction of custom homes (where the home buyer is the borrower) and provides financing to builders and consumers for the construction of pre-sold homes. The Bank generally receives a pre-arranged permanent financing commitment from an outside banking entity prior to financing the construction of pre-sold homes. The Bank also makes commercial real estate construction loans, primarily for owner-occupied properties. The Bank limits its construction lending risk through adherence to established underwriting procedures.
During the third quarter of 2012, the Company performed a review of all amortizing commercial construction loans to determine if loans written as a combination construction to permanent financing should be reclassified as commercial real estate loans. As a result of this review, the Company identified approximately $25.3 million in loans previously coded as construction that needed to be properly reclassified as permanent commercial real estate loans. There was no material impact to allowances for loan losses related to this transfer.
Residential one-to-four family loans amounted to $174.7 million and $179.0 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Bank's residential mortgage loans are typically construction loans that convert into permanent financing and are secured by properties located within the Bank's market areas.
During the first nine months of 2012, the decision was made by management to transfer two classified non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans in the amount of $7.6 million and $8.4 million from loans held-for-investment to loans held-for-sale. As a result of this transfer, approximately $4.3 million was charged-off in order to record the loans at fair value at time of transfer.
Commercial Loans. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Bank's commercial loan portfolio totaled $168.5 million and $177.0 million, respectively. Commercial loans include both secured and unsecured loans for working capital, expansion, and other business purposes. Short-term working capital loans are secured by accounts receivable, inventory and/or equipment. The Bank also makes term commercial loans secured by equipment and real estate. Lending decisions are based on an evaluation of the financial strength, cash flow, management and credit history of the borrower, and the quality of the collateral securing the loan. With few exceptions, the Bank requires personal guarantees and secondary sources of repayment. Commercial loans generally provide greater yields and reprice more frequently than other types of loans, such as real estate loans.
Consumer Loans. Loans to individuals (consumer loans) include automobile loans, boat and recreational vehicle financing, and miscellaneous secured and unsecured personal loans and totaled $54.8 million and $58.3 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Consumer loans generally can carry significantly greater risks than other loans, even if secured, if the collateral consists of rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles, and equipment. Repossessed collateral securing a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the loan. Consumer loan collections are sensitive to job loss, illness and other personal factors. The Bank manages the risks inherent in consumer lending by following established credit guidelines and underwriting practices designed to minimize risk of loss.
Loan Approvals. The Bank's loan policies and procedures establish the basic guidelines governing its lending operations. The guidelines address the type of loans that the Bank seeks, target markets, underwriting and collateral requirements, terms, interest rate and yield considerations and compliance with laws and regulations. All loans or credit lines are subject to approval procedures and amount limitations. These limitations apply to the borrower's total outstanding indebtedness to the Bank, including any indebtedness as a guarantor. The policies are reviewed and approved at least annually by the Board of Directors of the Bank. The Bank supplements its own supervision of the loan underwriting and approval process with periodic loan reviews by independent, outside professionals experienced in loan review. Responsibility for loan review,loan underwriting, and approval resides with the Chief Credit Officer position. On an annual basis, the Board of Directors of the Bank determines officers lending authority. Authorities may include loans, letters of credit, overdrafts, uncollected funds and such other authorities as determined by the Board of Directors.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
15
Substantially all of the Company's loans have been granted to customers in the Piedmont, foothills, northwestern mountains, and the Research Triangle regions of North Carolina and the upstate region of South Carolina.
Credit Review and Evaluation. The Bank has a credit risk review department that reports to the Chief Credit Officer. The focus of the department is on policy compliance and proper grading of higher credit risk loans as well as new and existing loans on a sample basis. Additional reporting for problem/criticized assets has been developed along with an after-the-fact loan review.
The Bank uses a risk grading program to facilitate the evaluation of probable inherent loan losses and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses for real estate, commercial and consumer loans. In this program, risk grades are initially assigned by loan officers, reviewed by regional credit officers, and further reviewed by internal credit review analysts on a test basis. The Bank strives to maintain the loan portfolio in accordance with conservative loan underwriting policies that result in loans specifically tailored to the needs of the Bank's market area. Every effort is made to identify and minimize the credit risks associated with such lending strategies.
Loans over $20,000 are risk graded on a scale from 1 (highest quality) to 8 (loss). Acceptable loans at inception are grades 1 through 4, and these grades have underwriting requirements that at least meet the minimum requirements of a secondary market source. If borrowers do not meet credit history requirements, other mitigating criteria such as substantial liquidity and low loan-to-value ratios could be considered and would generally have to be met in order to make the loan. The Bank's loan policy states that a guarantor may be necessary if reasonable doubt exists as to the borrower's ability to repay. The Board of Directors has authorized the loan officers to have individual approval authority for risk grade 1 through 4 loans up to maximum exposure limits for each customer. New or renewed loans that are graded 5 (special mention) or lower must have approval from a regional credit officer. Any changes in risk assessments as determined by loan officers, credit administrators, regulatory examiners and management are also considered.
The risk grades, normally assigned by the loan officers when the loan is originated and reviewed by the regional credit officers, are based on several factors including historical data, current economic factors, composition of the portfolio, and evaluations of the total loan portfolio and assessments of credit quality within specific loan types. In some cases, the risk grades are assigned by regional executives, depending upon dollar exposure. Because these factors are dynamic, the provision for loan losses can fluctuate. Credit quality reviews are based primarily on analysis of borrowers' cash flows, with asset values considered only as a second source of payment. Regional credit officers work with lenders in underwriting, structuring and risk grading the Bank's credits. The Risk Review Officer focuses on lending policy compliance, credit risk grading, and credit risk reviews on larger dollar exposures. Management uses the information developed from the procedures above in evaluating and grading the loan portfolio. This continual grading process is used to monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio and to assist management in determining the appropriate levels of the allowance for loan losses.
The following is a summary of the credit risk grade definitions for all loan types:
“1” - High Quality- These loans represent a credit extension of the highest quality. The borrower's historic (at least five years) cash flows manifest extremely large and stable margins of coverage. Balance sheets are conservative, well capitalized, and liquid. After considering debt service for proposed and existing debt, projected cash flows continue to be strong and provide ample coverage. The borrower typically reflects broad geographic and product diversification and has access to alternative financial markets.
“2” - Good Quality- These loans have a sound primary and secondary source of repayment. The borrower may have access to alternative sources of financing, but sources are not as widely available as they are to a higher graded borrower. This loan carries a normal level of risk, with minimal loss exposure. The borrower has the ability to perform according to the terms of the credit facility. The margins of cash flow coverage are satisfactory but vulnerable to more rapid deterioration than the highest quality loans.
“3” - Satisfactory- The borrowers are a reasonable credit risk and demonstrate the ability to repay the debt from normal business operations. Risk factors may include reliability of margins and cash flows, liquidity, dependence on a single product or industry, cyclical trends, depth of management, or limited access to alternative financing sources. Historic financial information may indicate erratic performance, but current trends are positive. Quality of financial information is adequate, but is not as detailed and sophisticated as information found on higher graded loans. If adverse circumstances arise, the impact on the borrower may be significant.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
16
“4” - Satisfactory - Merits Attention- These credit facilities have potential developing weaknesses that deserve extra attention from the account manager and other management personnel. If the developing weakness is not corrected or mitigated, there may be deterioration in the ability of the borrower to repay the bank's debt in the future.
“5” - Watch or Special Mention - These loans are typically existing loans, made using the passing grades outlined above, that have deteriorated to the point that cash flow is not consistently adequate to meet debt service or current debt service coverage is based on projections. Secondary sources of repayment may include specialized collateral or real estate that is not readily marketable or undeveloped, making timely collection in doubt.
“6” - Substandard- Loans and other credit extensions bearing this grade are considered inadequately protected by the current sound worth and debt service capacity of the borrower or of any pledged collateral. These obligations, even if apparently protected by collateral value, have well-defined weaknesses related to adverse financial, managerial, economic, market, or political conditions jeopardizing repayment of principal and interest as originally intended. Clear loss potential, however, does not have to exist in any individual assets classified as substandard.
“7” - Substandard Impaired (also includes any loans over 90 days past due, excluding sold mortgages )- Loans and other credit extensions graded “7” have all the weaknesses inherent in those graded “6,” with the added characteristic that the severity of the weaknesses makes collection or liquidation in full highly questionable or improbable based upon currently existing facts, conditions, and values. The probability of some loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific factors, the amount of loss cannot be determined.
"7B"- Doubtful- Loans and other credit extensions graded “7b” have all the weaknesses inherent in those graded “7,” with the added characteristic that the severity of the weaknesses makes collection or liquidation in full highly questionable or improbable based upon currently existing facts, conditions, and values. The probability of some loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific factors, the amount of loss cannot be determined. Such pending factors could include merger or liquidation, additional capital injection, refinancing plans, or perfection of liens on additional collateral. Loans in this classification are placed in non-accrual status, with collections applied to principal on the bank's books and evaluated for impairment. All loans in this category are considered impaired and all material loans are evaluated for a specific reserve in accordance with FAS 114 and the bank's ALLL methodology and specific reserve guidelines.
“8” - Loss- Loans in this classification are considered uncollectible and cannot be justified as a viable asset of the Bank. Such loans are to be charged-off or charged-down. This classification does not mean the loan has absolutely no recovery value, but that it is neither practical nor desirable to defer writing off this loan even though partial recovery may be obtained in the future.
The following is a summary of credit quality indicators by class at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate Credit Exposure as of September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | |
| | | Commercial Real Estate | | | | | | |
| Construction | | Owner occupied | | Non-owner occupied | | 1-4 Family | | Multifamily | | Home Equity |
| (in thousands) |
High Quality | $ | — |
| | $ | 121 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 379 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 116 |
|
Good Quality | 480 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,416 |
| | — |
| | 7,566 |
|
Satisfactory | 22,165 |
| | 107,794 |
| | 59,713 |
| | 96,222 |
| | 7,856 |
| | 119,279 |
|
Merits Attention | 70,357 |
| | 192,518 |
| | 137,137 |
| | 58,010 |
| | 28,164 |
| | 59,019 |
|
Special Mention | 22,137 |
| | 23,906 |
| | 21,108 |
| | 8,479 |
| | 575 |
| | 4,223 |
|
Substandard | 10,428 |
| | 5,171 |
| | 2,013 |
| | 3,087 |
| | 609 |
| | 2,336 |
|
Substandard impaired | 19,632 |
| | 17,398 |
| | 10,883 |
| | 7,119 |
| | 783 |
| | 3,950 |
|
Doubtful | 2,209 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| $ | 147,408 |
| | $ | 346,908 |
| | $ | 230,854 |
| | $ | 174,712 |
| | $ | 37,987 |
| | $ | 196,489 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
17
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Credit Exposures as of September 30, 2012 | | | | | |
| Commercial | | Consumer and other | | Total Loans |
| (in thousands) |
High Quality | $ | 2,620 |
| | $ | 2,473 |
| | $ | 5,709 |
|
Good Quality | 5,300 |
| | 1,383 |
| | 16,145 |
|
Satisfactory | 50,336 |
| | 24,880 |
| | 488,245 |
|
Merits Attention | 81,934 |
| | 24,748 |
| | 651,887 |
|
Special Mention | 17,549 |
| | 629 |
| | 98,606 |
|
Substandard | 1,613 |
| | 88 |
| | 25,345 |
|
Substandard impaired | 9,158 |
| | 571 |
| | 69,494 |
|
Doubtful | — |
| | — |
| | 2,209 |
|
Loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| $ | 168,510 |
| | $ | 54,772 |
| | $ | 1,357,640 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate Credit Exposure as of December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | |
| | | Commercial Real Estate | | | | | | |
| Construction | | Owner occupied | | Non-owner occupied | | 1-4 Family | | Multifamily | | Home Equity |
| (in thousands) |
High Quality | $ | — |
| | $ | 126 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 423 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 132 |
|
Good Quality | 543 |
| | 32 |
| | 117 |
| | 1,701 |
| | — |
| | 7,545 |
|
Satisfactory | 30,446 |
| | 110,051 |
| | 61,416 |
| | 98,992 |
| | 8,789 |
| | 125,932 |
|
Merits Attention | 93,974 |
| | 180,173 |
| | 134,247 |
| | 57,310 |
| | 28,824 |
| | 58,576 |
|
Special Mention | 41,739 |
| | 23,326 |
| | 24,307 |
| | 9,112 |
| | 697 |
| | 4,807 |
|
Substandard | 5,054 |
| | 10,069 |
| | 11,162 |
| | 3,586 |
| | 629 |
| | 2,006 |
|
Substandard impaired | 31,047 |
| | 25,154 |
| | 11,578 |
| | 7,923 |
| | 942 |
| | 2,222 |
|
Doubtful | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| $ | 202,803 |
| | $ | 348,931 |
| | $ | 242,827 |
| | $ | 179,047 |
| | $ | 39,881 |
| | $ | 201,220 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Credit Exposures as of December 31, 2011 | | | | | |
| Commercial | | Consumer and other | | Total Loans |
| (in thousands) |
High Quality | $ | 2,690 |
| | $ | 1,831 |
| | $ | 5,202 |
|
Good Quality | 5,472 |
| | 1,482 |
| | 16,892 |
|
Satisfactory | 55,309 |
| | 27,508 |
| | 518,443 |
|
Merits Attention | 80,064 |
| | 25,607 |
| | 658,775 |
|
Special Mention | 12,224 |
| | 1,189 |
| | 117,401 |
|
Substandard | 10,367 |
| | 118 |
| | 42,991 |
|
Substandard impaired | 10,921 |
| | 548 |
| | 90,335 |
|
Doubtful | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| $ | 177,047 |
| | $ | 58,283 |
| | $ | 1,450,039 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
18
Nonaccrual loans and past due loans. Nonperforming assets include loans classified as nonaccrual, foreclosed bank-owned property and loans past due 90 days or more on which interest is still being accrued. It is the general policy of the Bank to stop accruing interest for all classes of loans past due 90 days or when it is apparent that the collection of principal and/or interest is doubtful. In addition, certain restructured loans are placed on nonaccrual status until sufficient evidence of timely payment is obtained. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income in the current period. Amounts received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied first to principal and then to interest only after all principal has been collected. There were no financing receivables past due over 90 days accruing interest as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Nonperforming loans as of September 30, 2012 totaled $57.1 million, or 4.12% of total loans, compared with $70.4 million, or 4.78% of total loans, as of December 31, 2011. The Bank aggressively pursues the collection and repayment of all loans. Other nonperforming assets, such as repossessed and foreclosed collateral is aggressively liquidated by the Bank's collection department. The total number of loans on nonaccrual status has decreased from 505 at December 31, 2011 to 441 at September 30, 2012.
The following is a breakdown of nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
| (in thousands) |
Financing Receivables on Nonaccrual status | |
Construction | $ | 16,497 |
| | $ | 26,575 |
|
Commercial Real Estate: | | | |
Owner occupied | 14,771 |
| | 16,339 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 5,936 |
| | 7,634 |
|
Mortgages: | | | |
1-4 Family first lien | 6,370 |
| | 7,271 |
|
Multifamily | 713 |
| | 942 |
|
Home Equity lines of credit | 3,950 |
| | 2,222 |
|
Commercial | 8,293 |
| | 8,896 |
|
Consumer and other | 523 |
| | 475 |
|
Total | $ | 57,053 |
| | $ | 70,354 |
|
Past due loans reported in the following table do not include loans granted forbearance terms since payments terms have been modified or extended, although the loans are past due based on original contract terms. All loans with forbearance terms are included and reported as impaired loans.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
19
Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest income have not been received as of the date such payments were due. The following table presents the Bank's aged analysis of past due loans:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 30-59 Days Past Due | | 60-89 Days Past Due | | Greater Than 90 Days | | Total Past Due | | Current | | Total Loans |
September 30, 2012 | (in thousands) |
Construction | $ | 706 |
| | $ | 2,258 |
| | $ | 8,223 |
| | $ | 11,187 |
| | $ | 136,221 |
| | $ | 147,408 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | |
| | | |
|
Owner occupied | 1,414 |
| | 1,883 |
| | 3,727 |
| | 7,024 |
| | 339,884 |
| | 346,908 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 2,686 |
| | 2,178 |
| | 3,141 |
| | 8,005 |
| | 222,849 |
| | 230,854 |
|
Commercial | 767 |
| | 3,678 |
| | 3,055 |
| | 7,500 |
| | 161,010 |
| | 168,510 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | |
| | | |
|
Secured 1-4 family- first lien | 2,286 |
| | 1,534 |
| | 3,406 |
| | 7,226 |
| | 167,486 |
| | 174,712 |
|
Multifamily | 6 |
| | 79 |
| | — |
| | 85 |
| | 37,902 |
| | 37,987 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 1,345 |
| | 216 |
| | 2,209 |
| | 3,770 |
| | 192,719 |
| | 196,489 |
|
Consumer and other | 276 |
| | 112 |
| | 258 |
| | 646 |
| | 54,126 |
| | 54,772 |
|
Total | $ | 9,486 |
| | $ | 11,938 |
| | $ | 24,019 |
| | $ | 45,443 |
| | $ | 1,312,197 |
| | $ | 1,357,640 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | $ | 2,265 |
| | $ | 402 |
| | $ | 15,538 |
| | $ | 18,205 |
| | $ | 184,598 |
| | $ | 202,803 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Owner occupied | 4,342 |
| | 1,215 |
| | 3,727 |
| | 9,284 |
| | 339,647 |
| | 348,931 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 9,723 |
| | 86 |
| | 4,679 |
| | 14,488 |
| | 228,339 |
| | 242,827 |
|
Commercial | 586 |
| | 1,432 |
| | 2,087 |
| | 4,105 |
| | 172,942 |
| | 177,047 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Secured 1-4 family- first lien | 3,441 |
| | 1,049 |
| | 2,955 |
| | 7,445 |
| | 171,602 |
| | 179,047 |
|
Multifamily | 277 |
| | — |
| | 896 |
| | 1,173 |
| | 38,708 |
| | 39,881 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | — |
| | 634 |
| | 856 |
| | 1,490 |
| | 199,730 |
| | 201,220 |
|
Consumer and other | 375 |
| | 61 |
| | 128 |
| | 564 |
| | 57,719 |
| | 58,283 |
|
Total | $ | 21,009 |
| | $ | 4,879 |
| | $ | 30,866 |
| | $ | 56,754 |
| | $ | 1,393,285 |
| | $ | 1,450,039 |
|
Impaired Loans. Management considers certain loans graded “substandard impaired” (loans graded 7), "doubtful" (loans graded 7B) or “loss” (loans graded 8) to be individually impaired and may consider “substandard” loans (loans graded 6) individually impaired depending on the borrower's payment history. The Bank measures impairment based upon probable cash flows or the value of the collateral. Collateral value is assessed based on collateral value trends, liquidation value trends, and other liquidation expenses to determine logical and credible discounts that may be needed. Updated appraisals are required for all impaired loans and typically at renewal or modification of larger loans if the appraisal is more than 12 months old.
Impaired loans for all classes of loans typically include nonaccrual loans, loans over 90 days past due still accruing, troubled debt restructured loans and other potential problem loans considered impaired based on other underlying factors. Troubled debt restructured loans are those for which concessions, including the reduction of interest rates below a rate otherwise available to that borrower or the deferral of interest or principal have been granted due to the borrower's weakened financial condition. Interest on troubled debt restructured loans is accrued at the restructured rates when it is anticipated that no loss of original principal will occur and a sustained payment performance period is obtained. Due to the borrowers' inability to make the payments required under the original loan terms, the Bank modifies the terms by granting a longer amortized repayment structure or reduced interest rates. Potential problem loans are loans which are currently performing and are not included in nonaccrual or restructured loans above, but about which we have serious doubts as to the borrower's ability to comply with present repayment terms. These loans are likely to be included later in nonaccrual, past due or troubled debt restructured loans, so they are considered by management in assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Impaired loans under $250,000 are typically not individually evaluated for impairment.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
20
The following table presents the Bank's investment in loans considered to be impaired and related information on those impaired loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Quarter to Date | | Year to Date |
| Recorded Investment | Unpaid Principal Balance | Related Allowance | | Average Recorded Investment | Interest Income Recognized | | Average Recorded Investment | Interest Income Recognized |
September 30, 2012 | (in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans without a related allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | $ | 13,376 |
| $ | 14,563 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 14,694 |
| $ | 125 |
| | $ | 20,382 |
| $ | 275 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 14,056 |
| 14,756 |
| — |
| | 13,840 |
| 23 |
| | 15,594 |
| 332 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 3,506 |
| 3,893 |
| — |
| | 4,017 |
| 29 |
| | 8,193 |
| 39 |
|
Commercial | 6,226 |
| 6,432 |
| — |
| | 6,403 |
| — |
| | 6,316 |
| 130 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family real estate | 968 |
| 991 |
| — |
| | 1,432 |
| — |
| | 2,680 |
| 29 |
|
Multifamily | 701 |
| 884 |
| — |
| | 703 |
| 4 |
| | 702 |
| 7 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 1,706 |
| 1,767 |
| — |
| | 1,588 |
| — |
| | 1,320 |
| 7 |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
|
Impaired loans with a related allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | $ | 4,649 |
| $ | 5,382 |
| $ | 1,249 |
| | $ | 4,106 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 2,379 |
| $ | — |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 5,212 |
| 5,220 |
| 279 |
| | 6,154 |
| 66 |
| | 6,910 |
| 134 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 4,029 |
| 4,300 |
| 476 |
| | 3,491 |
| 26 |
| | 1,768 |
| 42 |
|
Commercial | 2,790 |
| 2,936 |
| 1,632 |
| | 2,865 |
| — |
| | 3,006 |
| 164 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family real estate | 903 |
| 919 |
| 155 |
| | 449 |
| — |
| | 411 |
| 3 |
|
Multifamily | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 30 |
| 7 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 29 |
| — |
| | 111 |
| — |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 54 |
| — |
| | 67 |
| — |
|
Total impaired loans | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | $ | 18,025 |
| $ | 19,945 |
| $ | 1,249 |
| | $ | 18,800 |
| $ | 125 |
| | $ | 22,761 |
| $ | 275 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 19,268 |
| 19,976 |
| 279 |
| | 19,994 |
| 89 |
| | 22,504 |
| 466 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 7,535 |
| 8,193 |
| 476 |
| | 7,508 |
| 55 |
| | 9,961 |
| 81 |
|
Commercial | 9,016 |
| 9,368 |
| 1,632 |
| | 9,268 |
| — |
| | 9,322 |
| 294 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family real estate | 1,871 |
| 1,910 |
| 155 |
| | 1,881 |
| — |
| | 3,091 |
| 32 |
|
Multifamily | 701 |
| 884 |
| — |
| | 703 |
| 4 |
| | 732 |
| 14 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 1,706 |
| 1,767 |
| — |
| | 1,617 |
| — |
| | 1,431 |
| 7 |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 54 |
| — |
| | 67 |
| — |
|
Total impaired loans individually reviewed for impairment | $ | 58,122 |
| $ | 62,043 |
| $ | 3,791 |
| | $ | 59,825 |
| $ | 273 |
| | $ | 69,869 |
| $ | 1,169 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
21
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2011 | | Quarter to Date September 30, 2011 | | Year to Date September 30, 2011 |
| Recorded Investment | Unpaid Principal Balance | Related Allowance | | Average Recorded Investment | Interest Income Recognized | | Average Recorded Investment | Interest Income Recognized |
| (in thousands) |
Impaired loans without a related allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | $ | 28,067 |
| $ | 40,045 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 22,835 |
| $ | 81 |
| | $ | 26,288 |
| $ | 139 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 17,586 |
| 20,070 |
| — |
| | 10,104 |
| 88 |
| | 13,166 |
| 175 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 8,639 |
| 11,255 |
| — |
| | 6,640 |
| 59 |
| | 8,591 |
| 155 |
|
Commercial | 6,381 |
| 6,436 |
| — |
| | 2,560 |
| 42 |
| | 3,636 |
| 126 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family real estate | 3,843 |
| 4,285 |
| — |
| | 2,372 |
| 14 |
| | 2,851 |
| 24 |
|
Multifamily | 295 |
| 309 |
| — |
| | 299 |
| — |
| | 304 |
| — |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 525 |
| 694 |
| — |
| | 707 |
| — |
| | 725 |
| — |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| — |
|
Impaired loans with a related allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | $ | 1,011 |
| $ | 1,011 |
| $ | 570 |
| | $ | 9,159 |
| $ | 2 |
| | $ | 8,740 |
| $ | 5 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 6,459 |
| 6,533 |
| 585 |
| | 3,209 |
| 7 |
| | 5,891 |
| 22 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 975 |
| 1,363 |
| 143 |
| | 2,517 |
| — |
| | 4,994 |
| — |
|
Commercial | 2,914 |
| 2,920 |
| 2,511 |
| | 1,067 |
| 24 |
| | 5,218 |
| 71 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family real estate | 498 |
| 517 |
| 45 |
| | 1,010 |
| 2 |
| | 2,331 |
| 6 |
|
Multifamily | 300 |
| 319 |
| 135 |
| | 460 |
| — |
| | 454 |
| — |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 403 |
| 412 |
| 112 |
| | 749 |
| — |
| | 720 |
| — |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 130 |
| — |
| | 129 |
| — |
|
Total impaired loans | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | $ | 29,078 |
| $ | 41,056 |
| $ | 570 |
| | $ | 31,994 |
| $ | 83 |
| | $ | 35,028 |
| $ | 144 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 24,045 |
| 26,603 |
| 585 |
| | 13,313 |
| 95 |
| | 19,057 |
| 197 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 9,614 |
| 12,618 |
| 143 |
| | 9,157 |
| 59 |
| | 13,585 |
| 155 |
|
Commercial | 9,295 |
| 9,356 |
| 2,511 |
| | 3,627 |
| 66 |
| | 8,854 |
| 197 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family real estate | 4,341 |
| 4,802 |
| 45 |
| | 3,382 |
| 16 |
| | 5,182 |
| 30 |
|
Multifamily | 595 |
| 628 |
| 135 |
| | 759 |
| — |
| | 758 |
| — |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 928 |
| 1,106 |
| 112 |
| | 1,456 |
| — |
| | 1,445 |
| — |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| — |
| — |
| | 130 |
| — |
| | 129 |
| — |
|
Total impaired loan individually reviewed for impairment | $ | 77,896 |
| $ | 96,169 |
| $ | 4,101 |
| | $ | 63,818 |
| $ | 319 |
| | $ | 84,038 |
| $ | 723 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
22
Impaired loans acquired in business combinations without a related allowance for loan losses includes loans for which no additional reserves have been recorded in excess of credit discounts for purchased impaired loans. Impaired loans acquired with subsequent deterioration and related allowance for loan losses are loans in which additional impairment has been identified in excess of credit discounts resulting in additional reserves. These additional reserves are included in the allowance for loan losses related to purchased impaired loans and were $15,000 and $49,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
At September 30, 2012, the outstanding balance of purchased impaired loans from American Community Bancshares, Inc. ("American Community"), which includes principal, interest and fees due, was $380,887. Because of the uncertainty of the expected cash flows, the Company is accounting for each purchased impaired loan under the cost recovery method, in which all cash payments are applied to principal. Thus, there is no accretable yield associated with the above loans.
Troubled Debt Restructured Loans. Total amount of troubled debt restructured loans outstanding as of September 30, 2012 was $35.6 million with related reserves of $1.8 million. Approximately $13.9 million of troubled debt restructured loans are accruing interest as of September 30, 2012, as these loans have sufficient evidence of paying according to the new restructured terms. Total amount of troubled debt restructured loans outstanding as of December 31, 2011 were $43.5 million with related reserves of $2.3 million. Approximately $17.2 million of troubled debt restructured loans are accruing interest as of December 31, 2011, as these loans have sufficient evidence of paying according to the new restructured terms.
The following tables include the recorded investment and number of modifications for troubled debt restructured loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011. The Company reports the recorded investment in the loans prior to a modification and also the recorded investment in the loans after the loans were restructured. Reductions in the recorded investment are primarily due to the partial charge-off of the principal balance prior to modification.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
| Number of Loans | | Recorded Investment Prior to Modification | | Recorded Investment After Modification |
| | | (in thousands) |
Below market interest rate | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family mortgages | 1 |
| | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 391 |
|
Total | 1 |
| | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 391 |
|
| | | | | |
Extended payment terms | | | | | |
Construction | 2 |
| | $ | 521 |
| | $ | 521 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | |
Non-owner occupied | 2 |
| | 1,375 |
| | 1,156 |
|
Owner occupied | 2 |
| | 353 |
| | 331 |
|
Total | 6 |
| | $ | 2,249 |
| | $ | 2,008 |
|
| | | | | |
Total | 7 |
| | $ | 2,645 |
| | $ | 2,399 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
23
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
| Number of Loans | | Recorded Investment Prior to Modification | | Recorded Investment After Modification |
| | | (in thousands) |
Below market interest rate | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family mortgages | 1 |
| | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 391 |
|
Total | 1 |
| | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 391 |
|
| | | | | |
Extended payment terms | | | | | |
Construction | 5 |
| | $ | 1,231 |
| | $ | 873 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | |
Non-owner occupied | 3 |
| | 1,586 |
| | 1,367 |
|
Owner occupied | 7 |
| | 2,065 |
| | 2,021 |
|
Commercial | 6 |
| | 1,872 |
| | 1,482 |
|
1-4 Family Residential | 3 |
| | 827 |
| | 751 |
|
Consumer | 1 |
| | 26 |
| | 24 |
|
Total | 25 |
| | $ | 7,607 |
| | $ | 6,518 |
|
Principal payment reduction | | | | | |
Commercial real estate: | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 2 |
| | $ | 571 |
| | $ | 571 |
|
Consumer | 1 |
| | 165 |
| | 9 |
|
Total | 3 |
| | $ | 736 |
| | $ | 580 |
|
| | | | | |
Total | 29 |
| | $ | 8,739 |
| | $ | 7,489 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
24
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
| Number of Loans | | Recorded Investment Prior to Modification | | Recorded Investment After Modification |
| | | (in thousands) |
Below market interest rate | | | | | |
Construction | 2 |
| | $ | 1,721 |
| | $ | 1,705 |
|
Secured 1-4 family mortgages | 1 |
| | 150 |
| | 150 |
|
Total | 3 |
| | $ | 1,871 |
| | $ | 1,855 |
|
| | | | | |
Extended payment terms | | | | | |
Construction | 3 |
| | $ | 595 |
| | $ | 586 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | |
Non-owner occupied | 2 |
| | 734 |
| | 139 |
|
Owner occupied | 4 |
| | 6,834 |
| | 6,404 |
|
Commercial | 1 |
| | 120 |
| | 120 |
|
Total | 10 |
| | $ | 8,283 |
| | $ | 7,249 |
|
| | | | | |
Principal payment reduction | | | | | |
Construction | 1 |
| | $ | 400 |
| | $ | 258 |
|
Commercial | 1 |
| | 16 |
| | 15 |
|
Total | 2 |
| | $ | 416 |
| | $ | 273 |
|
| | | | | |
Total | 15 |
| | $ | 10,570 |
| | $ | 9,377 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
25
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
| Number of Loans | | Recorded Investment Prior to Modification | | Recorded Investment After Modification |
| | | (in thousands) |
Below market interest rate | | | | | |
Construction | 3 |
| | $ | 2,221 |
| | $ | 2,131 |
|
Secured 1-4 family mortgages | 1 |
| | 150 |
| | 150 |
|
Total | 4 |
| | $ | 2,371 |
| | $ | 2,281 |
|
| | | | | |
Extended payment terms | | | | | |
Construction | 8 |
| | 2,705 |
| | 2,449 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | |
Non-owner occupied | 3 |
| | 1,133 |
| | 533 |
|
Owner occupied | 9 |
| | 8,230 |
| | 7,743 |
|
Commercial | 3 |
| | 346 |
| | 120 |
|
1-4 Family Residential | 2 |
| | 327 |
| | 197 |
|
Consumer | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | 25 |
| | $ | 12,741 |
| | $ | 11,042 |
|
Principal payment reduction | | | | | |
Construction | 4 |
| | 3,302 |
| | 1,060 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 1 |
| | 240 |
| | — |
|
Commercial | 2 |
| | 64 |
| | 62 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 1 |
| | 165 |
| | 165 |
|
Total | 8 |
| | 3,771 |
| | 1,287 |
|
| | | | | |
Total | 37 |
| | $ | 18,883 |
| | $ | 14,610 |
|
The following tables present loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings during the previous twelve months and for which there was a payment default during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. There were no payment defaults for troubled debt restructurings for the three months ended September 30, 2012.
|
| | | | | | |
| | Nine months ended September 30, 2012 |
| | Number of loans | Recorded investment |
Below Market Rate | | | (in thousands) |
Construction | | 1 |
| $ | 578 |
|
Total | | 1 |
| $ | 578 |
|
Extended payment terms | | | |
Consumer | | 1 |
| $ | 24 |
|
Total | | 1 |
| $ | 24 |
|
| | | |
Total | | 2 |
| $ | 602 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
26
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, 2011 | | Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
| | Number of loans | Recorded investment | | Number of loans | Recorded investment |
Extended payment terms | | | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) |
Construction | | 1 |
| $ | 221 |
| | 1 |
| $ | 221 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | |
Non-owner occupied | | 1 |
| 1,789 |
| | 1 |
| 1,789 |
|
Commercial | | — |
| — |
| | 2 |
| 226 |
|
Secured 1-4 family mortgages | | 1 |
| 120 |
| | 1 |
| 120 |
|
Total | | 3 |
| $ | 2,130 |
| | 5 |
| $ | 2,356 |
|
| | | | | | |
Principal payment reduction | | | | | | |
Construction | | 1 |
| $ | 797 |
| | 1 |
| $ | 797 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | | — |
| | | 1 |
| 240 |
|
Total | | 1 |
| $ | 797 |
| | 2 |
| $ | 1,037 |
|
| | | | | | |
Total | | 4 |
| $ | 2,927 |
| | 7 |
| $ | 3,393 |
|
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, which represents management's best estimate for probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The primary risks inherent in the Bank's loan portfolio, including the adequacy of the allowance or reserve for loan losses, are based on management's assumptions regarding, among other factors, general and local economic conditions, which are difficult to predict and are beyond the Bank's control. In estimating these risks, and the related loss reserve levels, management also considers the financial conditions of specific borrowers and credit concentrations with specific borrowers, groups of borrowers, and industries.
The allowance for loan losses is adjusted by direct charges to provision expense. Losses on loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses in the accounting period in which they are determined by management to be uncollectible. Recoveries during the period are credited to the allowance for loan losses. The provision for loan losses was $4.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $2.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2011. The provision expense is determined by management with the use of the Bank's allowance for loan losses model. The components of the model are specific reserves for impaired loans and a general allocation for unimpaired loans. The general allocation has two components, an estimate based on historical loss experience and an additional estimate based on internal and external environmental factors due to the uncertainty of historical loss experience in predicting current embedded losses in the portfolio that will be realized in the future.
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company completed the transition to the use of migration analysis in calculating historical loss experience for collectively evaluated loans. This method takes into consideration the probability of loss for each loan type by credit quality, and historical losses given default by loan type. Previously, the Company utilized migration analysis in determining its reserve for classified loans, while continuing to incorporate average historical losses for all collectively evaluated loans. The migration analysis is utilized across all risk categories and for all non-impaired loans, and average historical losses are excluded from the calculation. The impact of this change to the allowance for loan losses was an increase of $1.4 million in general reserve allocation during the second quarter of 2012.
The portion of the general allocation on environmental factors includes estimates of losses related to interest rate trends, unemployment trends, real estate characteristics, past due and nonaccrual trends, watch list trends, charge-off trends, and underwriting and servicing assessments. Markets served by the Bank continue to experience softening from the general economy and declines in real estate values. The real estate characteristics component includes trends in real estate concentrations, exceptions to FDIC guidelines for loan-to-value ratios, and changes in real estate market values. Other factors impacting the allowance at September 30, 2012 were watch list trends, unemployment rate trends, and underwriting and servicing assessments.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
27
The following table presents changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2012 | | Charge-offs | | Recoveries | | Provision | | September 30, 2012 |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Construction | $ | 5,903 |
| | $ | 3,881 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 3,675 |
| | $ | 5,742 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 5,630 |
| | 146 |
| | 2 |
| | (943 | ) | | 4,543 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 3,582 |
| | 697 |
| | 256 |
| | 1,096 |
| | 4,237 |
|
Commercial | 4,715 |
| | 771 |
| | 63 |
| | 624 |
| | 4,631 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | |
|
Secured 1-4 family- first lien | 3,063 |
| | 57 |
| | 4 |
| | (83 | ) | | 2,927 |
|
Multifamily | 563 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | 568 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 4,399 |
| | 372 |
| | 29 |
| | (162 | ) | | 3,894 |
|
Consumer and other | 942 |
| | 313 |
| | 21 |
| | 39 |
| | 689 |
|
| $ | 28,797 |
| | $ | 6,237 |
| | $ | 420 |
| | $ | 4,251 |
| | $ | 27,231 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2011 | | Charge-offs | | Recoveries | | Provision | | September 30, 2011 |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Construction | $ | 10,770 |
| | $ | 1,175 |
| | $ | 630 |
| | $ | (390 | ) | | $ | 9,835 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | |
|
Owner occupied | 6,701 |
| | 546 |
| | 3 |
| | (506 | ) | | 5,652 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 4,280 |
| | 1,101 |
| | — |
| | 707 |
| | 3,886 |
|
Commercial | 4,020 |
| | 489 |
| | 278 |
| | 976 |
| | 4,785 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | |
|
Secured 1-4 family- first lien | 4,514 |
| | 584 |
| | 84 |
| | 223 |
| | 4,237 |
|
Multifamily | 526 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48 |
| | 574 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 4,012 |
| | 973 |
| | 17 |
| | 867 |
| | 3,923 |
|
Consumer and other | 829 |
| | 156 |
| | 77 |
| | 31 |
| | 781 |
|
| $ | 35,652 |
| | $ | 5,024 |
| | $ | 1,089 |
| | $ | 1,956 |
| | $ | 33,673 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
28
The following table presents changes in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2011 | | Charge-offs | | Recoveries | | Provision | | September 30, 2012 |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Construction | $ | 8,214 |
| | $ | 7,823 |
| | $ | 323 |
| | $ | 5,028 |
| | $ | 5,742 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 5,792 |
| | 2,019 |
| | 126 |
| | 644 |
| | 4,543 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 4,668 |
| | 2,461 |
| | 289 |
| | 1,741 |
| | 4,237 |
|
Commercial | 5,712 |
| | 1,789 |
| | 829 |
| | (121 | ) | | 4,631 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family- first lien | 3,726 |
| | 625 |
| | 153 |
| | (327 | ) | | 2,927 |
|
Multifamily | 805 |
| | 213 |
| | — |
| | (24 | ) | | 568 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 3,310 |
| | 1,073 |
| | 50 |
| | 1,607 |
| | 3,894 |
|
Consumer and other | 621 |
| | 521 |
| | 317 |
| | 272 |
| | 689 |
|
| $ | 32,848 |
| | $ | 16,524 |
| | $ | 2,087 |
| | $ | 8,820 |
| | $ | 27,231 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2010 | | Charge-offs | | Recoveries | | Provision | | September 30, 2011 |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Construction | $ | 12,014 |
| | $ | 9,050 |
| | $ | 1,710 |
| | $ | 5,161 |
| | $ | 9,835 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 5,958 |
| | 3,382 |
| | 109 |
| | 2,967 |
| | 5,652 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 7,150 |
| | 3,434 |
| | 52 |
| | 118 |
| | 3,886 |
|
Commercial | 4,335 |
| | 2,513 |
| | 389 |
| | 2,574 |
| | 4,785 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family- first lien | 3,706 |
| | 2,364 |
| | 161 |
| | 2,734 |
| | 4,237 |
|
Multifamily | 424 |
| | 11 |
| | — |
| | 161 |
| | 574 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 3,298 |
| | 2,659 |
| | 97 |
| | 3,187 |
| | 3,923 |
|
Consumer and other | 867 |
| | 569 |
| | 169 |
| | 314 |
| | 781 |
|
| $ | 37,752 |
| | $ | 23,982 |
| | $ | 2,687 |
| | $ | 17,216 |
| | $ | 33,673 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
29
The following tables provide the a breakdown of allowance for loan losses for collectively evaluated and individually evaluated loans by type as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserves for loans individually evaluated for impairment | | Loans individually evaluated for impairment | | Reserves for loans collectively evaluated for impairment | | Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
As of September 30, 2012 | (Amounts in thousands) |
Construction | $ | 1,249 |
| | $ | 18,025 |
| | $ | 4,493 |
| | $ | 129,383 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 279 |
| | 19,268 |
| | 4,264 |
| | 327,640 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 476 |
| | 7,535 |
| | 3,761 |
| | 223,319 |
|
Commercial | 1,632 |
| | 9,016 |
| | 2,999 |
| | 159,494 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family- first lien | 155 |
| | 1,871 |
| | 2,773 |
| | 172,841 |
|
Multifamily | — |
| | 701 |
| | 567 |
| | 37,286 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | — |
| | 1,706 |
| | 3,894 |
| | 194,783 |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| | — |
| | 689 |
| | 54,772 |
|
| $ | 3,791 |
| | $ | 58,122 |
| | $ | 23,440 |
| | $ | 1,299,518 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Reserves for loans individually evaluated for impairment | | Loans individually evaluated for impairment | | Reserves for loans collectively evaluated for impairment | | Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
As of December 31, 2011 | (Amounts in thousands) |
Construction | $ | 570 |
| | $ | 29,078 |
| | $ | 7,644 |
| | $ | 173,725 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 585 |
| | 24,045 |
| | 5,207 |
| | 324,886 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 143 |
| | 9,614 |
| | 4,525 |
| | 233,213 |
|
Commercial | 2,511 |
| | 9,295 |
| | 3,201 |
| | 167,752 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family- first lien | 45 |
| | 4,341 |
| | 3,681 |
| | 174,706 |
|
Multifamily | 135 |
| | 595 |
| | 670 |
| | 39,286 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 112 |
| | 928 |
| | 3,198 |
| | 200,292 |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| | — |
| | 621 |
| | 58,283 |
|
| $ | 4,101 |
| | $ | 77,896 |
| | $ | 28,747 |
| | $ | 1,372,143 |
|
The allowance model is applied to determine the specific allowance balance for impaired loans and the general allowance balance for unimpaired loans grouped by loan type.
The Company's loan charge-off policy for all loan classes is to charge down loans to net realizable value once a portion of the loan is determined to be uncollectable, and the underlying collateral shortfall is assessed. Unsecured loans (primarily consumer loans) are charged off against the reserve once the loan becomes 90 days past due or it is determined that a portion of the loan is uncollectable. Secured loans (primarily construction, real estate, commercial and other loans) are moved to nonaccrual status when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent or a portion of the loan is determined to be uncollectable and supporting collateral is not considered to be sufficient to cover potential losses. Nonaccrual loans are reviewed at least quarterly to determine if all or a portion of the loan is uncollectable. Nonaccrual loans that are determined to be solely collateral dependent are promptly charged down to net realizable value upon determination that they are impaired.
In addition to the allowance for loan losses, the Company also estimates probable losses related to unfunded lending commitments, such as letters of credit, financial guarantees and unfunded loan commitments. Unfunded lending commitments are analyzed and segregated by loan classification. These classifications, in conjunction with an analysis of historical loss experience, current
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
30
economic conditions, performance trends within specific portfolio segments and any other pertinent information, result in the estimation of the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. The reserve for credit losses related to unfunded lending commitments was $201,000 and $221,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
The Company maintains reserves for mortgage loans sold to agencies and investors in the event that, either through error or disagreement between the parties, the Company is required to indemnify the purchase. The reserves take into consideration risks associated with underwriting, key factors in the mortgage industry, loans with specific reserve requirements, past due loans and potential indemnification by the Company. Reserves are estimated based on consideration of factors in the mortgage industry such as declining collateral values and rising levels of delinquency, default and foreclosure, coupled with increased incidents of quality reviews at all levels of the mortgage industry seeking justification for pushing back losses to loan originators and wholesalers. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had reserves for mortgage loans sold of $1.7 million, and charges against reserves for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $115,238. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded $204,861 and $234,576 in provision expense related to potential repurchase and warranties exposure on the $94 million and $288.6 million in loan sales that occurred during that period, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded $18,000 in provision expense related to potential repurchase and warranties exposure. There were no charges against reserves for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. For the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company did not repurchase any mortgage loans sold. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had reserves for mortgage loans sold of $1.8 million.
11. Fair Value
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments for certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Available-for-sale securities, interest rate swaps, mortgage servicing rights, interest rate lock commitments and forward sale loan commitments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record other assets at fair value, such as loans held-for-investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments usually involve writing the asset down to fair value or the lower of cost or market value.
Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities
Available-for-sale investment securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security's credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities and private label entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. There have been no changes in valuation techniques for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Valuation techniques are consistent with techniques used in prior periods.
Interest Rate Swaps
Interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based on discounted cash flow models run by a third-party on a monthly basis. All future floating cash flows are projected and both floating and fixed cash flows are discounted to the valuation date. As a result, the Company classifies interest rate swaps as Level 3.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
31
The following table presents a rollforward of interest rate swaps from June 30, 2012 to September 30, 2012, and from June 30, 2011 to September 30, 2011.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Level 3 |
| Fair Value- Assets | | Fair Value- Liabilities |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Balance, June 30, 2011 | $ | 173 |
| | $ | 173 |
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements | — |
| | — |
|
Gains/losses included in other income | 55 |
| | 55 |
|
Balance, September 30, 2011 | $ | 228 |
| | $ | 228 |
|
| | | |
Balance, June 30, 2012 | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 213 |
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements | — |
| | — |
|
Gains/losses included in other income | — |
| | — |
|
Balance, September 30, 2012 | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 213 |
|
| | | |
The following table presents a rollforward of interest rate swaps from December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012, and from December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011. |
| Level 3 |
| Fair Value- Assets | | Fair Value- Liabilities |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | $ | 159 |
| | $ | 159 |
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements | — |
| | — |
|
Gains/losses included in other income | 69 |
| | 69 |
|
Balance, September 30, 2011 | $ | 228 |
| | $ | 228 |
|
| | | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | $ | 217 |
| | $ | 217 |
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements | — |
| | — |
|
Gains/losses included in other income | (4 | ) | | (4 | ) |
Balance, September 30, 2012 | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 213 |
|
Interest Rate Locks and Forward Loan Sale Commitments
Sidus, the Company's mortgage lending subsidiary, enters into interest rate lock commitments and commitments to sell mortgages. At September 30, 2012, the amount of fair value associated with these interest rate lock commitments and sale commitments was $(491,245) and $1,008,706, respectively. At December 31, 2011, the amount of fair value associated with these interest rate lock commitments and sale commitments was $129,818 and $57,363, respectively. The fair value of interest rate lock commitments is based on servicing rate premium, origination income net of origination costs, fall out rates and changes in loan pricing between the commitment date and period end, typically month end.
The Company classifies interest rate lock commitments as Level 3. The fair value of forward sales commitments is based on changes in loan pricing between the commitment date and period end. The Company classified forward sale commitments as Level 2. There have been no changes in valuation techniques for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Valuation techniques are consistent with techniques used in prior periods.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
32
The following table presents a rollforward of interest rate lock commitments for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Interest Rate Lock Commitments |
| Level 3 |
| Fair Value | | Fair Value |
| (In thousands) |
Balance, June 30, 2012 and 2011 | $ | 578 |
| | $ | 16 |
|
Gains/losses included in other income | (1,069 | ) | | 314 |
|
Transfer in and out | — |
| | — |
|
Balance, September 30, 2012 and 2011 | $ | (491 | ) | | $ | 330 |
|
| | | |
The following table presents a rollforward of interest rate lock commitments for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
| | | |
| Interest Rate Lock Commitments |
| Level 3 |
| Fair Value | | Fair Value |
| (In thousands) |
Balance, December 31, 2011 and 2010 | $ | 130 |
| | $ | 105 |
|
Gains/losses included in other income | (621 | ) | | 225 |
|
Transfer in and out | — |
| | — |
|
Balance, September 30, 2012 and 2011 | $ | (491 | ) | | $ | 330 |
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights
A valuation of mortgage servicing rights is performed using a pooling methodology. Similar loans are pooled together and evaluated on a discounted earnings basis to determine the present value of future earnings. The present value of the future earnings is the estimated market value for the pool, calculated by a third party at least semi-annually, using assumptions that a third party purchaser would utilize in evaluating a potential acquisition of the servicing. As such, the Company classifies loan servicing rights as a Level 3 asset. There have been no changes in valuation techniques for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Valuation techniques are consistent with techniques used in prior periods.
The following table presents a rollforward of mortgage servicing rights from December 31, 2011 and 2010 to September 30, 2012 and 2011 and June 30, 2012 and 2011 to September 30, 2012 and 2011 and shows that the mortgage servicing rights are classified as Level 3 as discussed above.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
33
|
| | | | | | | |
| Level 3 |
| Fair Value | | Fair Value |
| (In thousands) |
Balance, June 30, 2012 and 2011 | $ | 1,889 |
| | $ | 2,193 |
|
Capitalized | 300 |
| | 71 |
|
Gains/losses included in other income | (153 | ) | | (248 | ) |
Balance, September 30, 2012 and 2011 | $ | 2,036 |
| | $ | 2,016 |
|
| | | |
| Level 3 |
| Fair Value | | Fair Value |
| (In thousands) |
Balance, December 31, 2011 and 2010 | $ | 1,871 |
| | $ | 2,144 |
|
Capitalized | 645 |
| | 266 |
|
Gains/losses included in other income | (480 | ) | | (394 | ) |
Balance, September 30, 2012 and 2011 | $ | 2,036 |
| | $ | 2,016 |
|
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale
Loans held-for-sale are carried at lower of cost or market value. The fair value of loans held-for-sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. The changes in fair value of the assets are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with the mortgage loan held for sale. As such, the Company classifies loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a Level 2 asset. At September 30, 2012, the cost of the Company's mortgage loans held-for-sale was less than the market value. Accordingly, the Company's loans held-for-sale are carried at cost. There have been no changes in valuation techniques for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Valuation techniques are consistent with techniques used in prior periods.
Impaired Loans
The Company does not record loans held-for-investment at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with the Receivables topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value (through appraisal processes and applying liquidity discounts and deducting expected selling costs), market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At September 30, 2012, the majority of impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral by obtaining third-party appraisals and applying liquidity discounts. Third party appraisals are obtained at least annually for all impaired loans greater than $250,000. The Company records impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3. There have been no changes in valuation techniques for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Valuation techniques are consistent with techniques used in prior periods.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) is adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to OREO. Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management's estimation of the value of the collateral (through appraisal processes and applying liquidity discounts and deducting expected selling costs). When the fair value of the collateral is measured due to further deterioration in the value of the OREO since initial recognition, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3. The current carrying value of OREO at September 30, 2012 is $22.3 million. At December 31, 2011 the carrying value of OREO was $25.0 million. There have been no changes in valuation techniques for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Valuation techniques are consistent with techniques used in prior periods.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
34
The following table presents assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2012 (in thousands) | Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | |
U.S. government agencies | $ | 32,869 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 32,869 |
| | $ | — |
|
Government sponsored agencies: | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 83,264 |
| | — |
| | 83,264 |
| | — |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 137,483 |
| | — |
| | 137,483 |
| | — |
|
Private label collateralized mortgage obligations | 1,059 |
| | — |
| | 1,059 |
| | — |
|
State and municipal securities | 54,769 |
| | — |
| | 54,769 |
| | — |
|
Common and preferred stocks | 1,112 |
| | 1,112 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Interest rate swap agreements | 213 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 213 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements | (213 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (213 | ) |
Interest rate lock commitments | (491 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (491 | ) |
Forward loan sale commitments | 1,008 |
| | — |
| | 1,008 |
| | — |
|
Mortgage servicing rights | 2,036 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,036 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2011 (in thousands) | Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | |
U.S. government agencies | $ | 23,726 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23,726 |
| | $ | — |
|
Government sponsored agencies: | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 65,210 |
| | — |
| | 65,210 |
| | — |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 166,028 |
| | — |
| | 166,028 |
| | — |
|
Private label collateralized mortgage obligations | 1,256 |
| | — |
| | 1,256 |
| | — |
|
State and municipal securities | 73,118 |
| | — |
| | 73,118 |
| | — |
|
Common and preferred stocks | 1,084 |
| | 1,084 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Interest rate swap agreements | 216 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 216 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements | (216 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (216 | ) |
Interest rate lock commitments | 130 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 130 |
|
Forward loan sale commitments | 57 |
| | — |
| | 57 |
| | — |
|
Mortgage servicing rights | 1,871 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,871 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
35
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value at September 30, 2012 (in thousands) | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Input | | Range (Weighted Avg) |
Recurring measurements: | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | $ | 213 |
| | Discounted cash flow | | Discount rate | | 1-4% (1.20%) |
Interest Rate Lock Commitments | (491 | ) | | Pricing model | | Pull through rates | | 80-86% |
Mortgage Servicing Rights | 2,036 |
| | Discounted cash flow | | Constant prepayment rate | | 20.03% |
| | | | | Cost of service | | $50 |
| | | | | Discount rate | | 8% |
Nonrecurring measurements: | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | $ | 13,793 |
| | Discounted appraisals | | Collateral discounts | | 15-50% |
Other real estate owned | 8,715 |
| | Discounted appraisals | | Collateral discounts | | 6-15% |
The unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company's interest rate swap agreements is the discount rate. A significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The discount rate is determined by the third-party by obtaining third party market quotes from Reuters, which handle up to 30 year swap maturities. The Company's asset liability management team periodically reviews the discount rates utilized in determining the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements.
The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company's interest rate lock commitments is the closing ratio, which represents the percentage of loans currently in a lock position which management estimates will ultimately close. Generally, the fair value of an interest rate lock commitment is positive (negative) if the prevailing interest rate is lower (higher) than the interest rate lock commitment rate. Therefore, an increase in the pull through rates (i.e., higher percentage of loans are estimated to close) will result in the fair value of the interest rate lock commitments to increase if in a gain position, or decrease if in a loss position. The pull through ratio is largely dependent on the loan processing stage that a loan is currently in and the change in prevailing interest rates from the time of the rate lock. The pull through rate is computed by our secondary marketing system using historical data and the ratio is periodically reviewed by the Company's mortgage banking division.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company's mortgage servicing rights are the weighted average constant prepayment rate and weighted average discount rate. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Although the constant prepayment rate and the discount rate are not directly interrelated, they will generally move in opposite directions. The Company utilizes an independent third-party to estimate the fair value of mortgage servicing rights through use of a discounted cash flow model to calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income based on observable and unobservable inputs into the model to arrive at an estimated fair value. To assess the reasonableness of the fair value measurement, the fair value and constant prepayment rates are compared to forward-looking estimates by the Company.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
36
The following table presents assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
September 30, 2012 | (Amounts in thousands) |
Other real estate owned | $ | 8,715 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,715 |
|
Impaired loans: | | | | | | | |
Construction | 3,400 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,400 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 4,933 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,933 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 3,553 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,553 |
|
Commercial | 1,158 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,158 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family real estate | 749 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 749 |
|
Multifamily | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Home equity lines of credit | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
December 31, 2011 | (Amounts in thousands) |
Other real estate owned | $ | 5,391 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,391 |
|
Impaired loans: | | | | | | | |
Construction | 441 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 441 |
|
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | |
Owner occupied | 5,874 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,874 |
|
Non-owner occupied | 832 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 832 |
|
Commercial | 403 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 403 |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | |
Secured 1-4 family real estate | 453 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 453 |
|
Multifamily | 165 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 165 |
|
Home equity lines of credit | 291 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 291 |
|
Consumer and other | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
There were no transfers between valuation levels for any assets during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 or the quarter ended September 30, 2011. If different valuation techniques are deemed necessary, we would consider those transfers to occur at the end of the period when the assets are valued.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
37
12. Financial Instruments
The following is a summary of the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2012 |
| Carrying amount | | Estimated fair value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Financial assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 123,222 |
| | $ | 123,222 |
| | $ | 123,222 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Investment securities | 310,556 |
| | 310,556 |
| | 1,112 |
| | 309,444 |
| | — |
|
Loans and loans held-for-sale, net | 1,356,403 |
| | 1,228,930 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,228,930 |
|
Accrued interest receivable | 6,229 |
| | 6,229 |
| | — |
| | 6,229 |
| | — |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 4,155 |
| | 4,155 |
| | 4,155 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Forward sales commitments | 1,008 |
| | 1,008 |
| | — |
| | 1,008 |
| | — |
|
Interest rate swap agreements | 213 |
| | 213 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 213 |
|
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Demand deposits, NOW, savings | | | | | | | | | |
and money market accounts | 862,622 |
| | 858,491 |
| | — |
| | 858,491 |
| | — |
|
Time deposits | 788,838 |
| | 800,977 |
| | — |
| | 800,977 |
| | — |
|
Borrowed funds | 102,299 |
| | 103,270 |
| | — |
| | 103,270 |
| | — |
|
Accrued interest payable | 1,746 |
| | 1,746 |
| | — |
| | 1,746 |
| | — |
|
Interest rate swap agreements | 213 |
| | 213 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 213 |
|
Interest rate lock commitments | 491 |
| | 491 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 491 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2011 |
| Carrying amount | | Estimated fair value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
Financial assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 92,918 |
| | $ | 92,918 |
| | $ | 92,918 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Investment securities | 330,422 |
| | 330,422 |
| | 1,084 |
| | 329,338 |
| | — |
|
Loans and loans held-for-sale, net | 1,437,610 |
| | 1,365,586 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,365,586 |
|
Accrued interest receivable | 6,745 |
| | 6,745 |
| | — |
| | 6,745 |
| | — |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 6,130 |
| | 6,130 |
| | 6,130 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Forward sales commitments | 57 |
| | 57 |
| | — |
| | 57 |
| | — |
|
Interest rate swap agreements | 216 |
| | 216 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 216 |
|
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Demand deposits, NOW, savings | | | | | | | | | |
and money market accounts | 855,455 |
| | 855,455 |
| | — |
| | 855,455 |
| | — |
|
Time deposits | 875,886 |
| | 885,903 |
| | — |
| | 885,903 |
| | — |
|
Borrowed funds | 105,539 |
| | 106,923 |
| | — |
| | 106,923 |
| | — |
|
Accrued interest payable | 2,619 |
| | 2,619 |
| | — |
| | 2,619 |
| | — |
|
Interest rate swap agreements | 216 |
| | 216 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 216 |
|
Interest rate lock commitments | 130 |
| | 130 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 130 |
|
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
38
The fair value of marketable securities is based on quoted market prices, prices quoted for similar instruments, and prices obtained from independent pricing services.
For certain categories of loans, such as installment and commercial loans, the fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The cost of fixed rate mortgage loans held-for-sale approximates the lower of cost or market as these loans are typically sold within 60 days of origination. Fair values for adjustable-rate mortgages are based on quoted market prices of similar loans adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The Company applied an additional illiquidity discount in the amount of 10.0%.
The carrying value of FHLB stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the FHLB stock.
The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts is estimated using the present value of the projected cash flows using rates currently offered for similar deposits with similar maturities.
The fair values of borrowings are based on discounting expected cash flows at the interest rate for debt with the same or similar remaining maturities and collateral requirements. The carrying values of short-term borrowings, including overnight, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased and FHLB advances, approximates the fair values due to the short maturities of those instruments. The Company's credit risk is not material to calculation of fair value because these borrowings are collateralized.
The carrying values of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates fair values due to the short-term duration.
Interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based on discounted cash flow models. All future floating cash flows are projected and both floating and fixed cash flows are discounted to the valuation date.
Interest rate locks and forward loan sale commitments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of forward sales commitments is based on changes in loan pricing between the commitment date and period end, typically month end. The fair value of interest rate lock commitments is based on servicing release premium, origination income net of origination costs, and changes in loan pricing between the commitment date and period end, typically month end.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
39
13. Business Segment Information
The Company has two reportable segments, including banking activities and mortgage banking activities, which includes mortgage activities at the Bank and at Sidus Financial, a single member LLC with the Bank as the single member. Sidus is headquartered in Greensboro, North Carolina and offers mortgage banking services to its customers throughout the Southeast. The following table details the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 for bank activities and mortgage activities.
During the second quarter of 2012, a decision was made by management to make a change in how the Company's mortgage activities are reported based on the reorganization of the Bank's mortgage division and Sidus. This decision was made to improve overall reporting of its mortgage banking activities which are now analyzed and reviewed as a separate and distinct business segment. This change in reporting segment combines both mortgage activities of the Bank with mortgage activities that were previously reported separately from mortgage activities provided by Sidus. Reclassifications include interest income which was previously presented in other income, commission expenses recorded in salaries that are now recorded as a reduction in mortgage banking activity income, and other miscellaneous expenses previously recorded in other expenses that have been reclassified as a reduction to mortgage banking activity income. In addition, gains on sale of mortgage loans has been reclassified to be reported with mortgage banking income to provide a combined overview of the mortgage banking activity segment. The reclassifications had no effect on net income (loss) or shareholders' equity, as previously reported.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank Activities | | Mortgage Activities | | Other | | Total |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
For Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | |
Interest income | $ | 19,238 |
| | $ | 208 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 19,446 |
|
Interest expense | 3,985 |
| | 61 |
| | 211 |
| | 4,257 |
|
Net interest income | 15,253 |
| | 147 |
| | (211 | ) | | 15,189 |
|
Provision for loan losses | 4,254 |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | 4,251 |
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses | 10,999 |
| | 150 |
| | (211 | ) | | 10,938 |
|
Other income | 3,060 |
| | 1,599 |
| | 6 |
| | 4,665 |
|
Other expense | 13,589 |
| | 1,192 |
| | 11 |
| | 14,792 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | 470 |
| | 557 |
| | (216 | ) | | 811 |
|
Income taxes | 54 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 54 |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 416 |
| | $ | 557 |
| | $ | (216 | ) | | $ | 757 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 1,899,745 |
| | $ | 33,208 |
| | $ | (12,575 | ) | | $ | 1,920,378 |
|
Net loans | 1,331,637 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,331,637 |
|
Loans held for sale | — |
| | 24,766 |
| | — |
| | 24,766 |
|
| | | | | | | |
For Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | |
Interest income | $ | 59,641 |
| | $ | 538 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 60,179 |
|
Interest expense | 13,215 |
| | 90 |
| | 636 |
| | 13,941 |
|
Net interest income | 46,426 |
| | 448 |
| | (636 | ) | | 46,238 |
|
Provision for loan losses | 8,842 |
| | (22 | ) | | — |
| | 8,820 |
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses | 37,584 |
| | 470 |
| | (636 | ) | | 37,418 |
|
Other income | 8,134 |
| | 4,412 |
| | 35 |
| | 12,581 |
|
Other expense | 40,781 |
| | 3,297 |
| | 24 |
| | 44,102 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | 4,937 |
| | 1,585 |
| | (625 | ) | | 5,897 |
|
Income taxes | (9,329 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (9,329 | ) |
Net income (loss) | $ | 14,266 |
| | $ | 1,585 |
| | $ | (625 | ) | | $ | 15,226 |
|
| |
(1) | Note: The “Other” column includes asset eliminations representing the Bank's Due from Sidus account ($10,689 in 2012), the Bank's Investment in Sidus ($3,000 in 2012), and the Bank's A/R from Sidus ($0 in 2012). Also included in this column are Holding Company assets ($1,114 in 2012) and Holding Company income and expenses. |
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
40
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank Activities | | Mortgage Activities | | Other | | Total |
| (Amounts in thousands) |
For Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | | | | | | | |
Interest income | $ | 21,400 |
| | $ | 165 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 21,565 |
|
Interest expense | 5,738 |
| | 10 |
| | 192 |
| | 5,940 |
|
Net interest income | 15,662 |
| | 155 |
| | (192 | ) | | 15,625 |
|
Provision for loan losses | 1,922 |
| | 34 |
| | — |
| | 1,956 |
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses | 13,740 |
| | 121 |
| | (192 | ) | | 13,669 |
|
Other income | 4,281 |
| | 996 |
| | (54 | ) | | 5,223 |
|
Other expense | 11,299 |
| | 1,528 |
| | 2 |
| | 12,829 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense | 6,722 |
| | (411 | ) | | (248 | ) | | 6,063 |
|
Income tax expense | 2,384 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,384 |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 4,338 |
| | $ | (411 | ) | | $ | (248 | ) | | $ | 3,679 |
|
Total assets | $ | 2,026,753 |
| | $ | 23,142 |
| | $ | (2,764 | ) | | $ | 2,047,131 |
|
Net loans | 1,439,927 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,439,927 |
|
Loans held for sale | 357 |
| | 13,444 |
| | — |
| | 13,801 |
|
Goodwill | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | |
For Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | | | | | | | |
Interest income | $ | 67,351 |
| | $ | 236 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 67,587 |
|
Interest expense | 19,891 |
| | 219 |
| | 576 |
| | 20,686 |
|
Net interest income | 47,460 |
| | 17 |
| | (576 | ) | | 46,901 |
|
Provision for loan losses | 17,162 |
| | 54 |
| | — |
| | 17,216 |
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses | 30,298 |
| | (37 | ) | | (576 | ) | | 29,685 |
|
Other income | 10,431 |
| | 3,476 |
| | (136 | ) | | 13,771 |
|
Other expense | 42,408 |
| | 11,433 |
| | 30 |
| | 53,871 |
|
Loss before income tax expense | (1,679 | ) | | (7,994 | ) | | (742 | ) | | (10,415 | ) |
Income tax expense | 6,905 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,905 |
|
Net loss | $ | (8,584 | ) | | $ | (7,994 | ) | | $ | (742 | ) | | $ | (17,320 | ) |
________________________
| |
(1) | As an LLC, Sidus passes its pre-tax income through to its single member, the Bank, which is taxed on that income. |
| |
(2) | Note: The “Other” column includes asset eliminations representing the Bank's Due from Sidus account ($3,286 in 2011), the Bank's Investment in Sidus ($3,000 in 2011), and the Bank's A/R from Sidus ($614 in 2011). Also included in this column are Holding Company assets ($1,258 in 2011) and Holding Company income and expenses. |
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
41
14. Income Taxes
The following table presents the provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
| (in thousands) |
Current: | | | |
Federal | $ | (342 | ) | | $ | 1,627 |
|
State | — |
| | — |
|
| (342 | ) | | 1,627 |
|
Deferred: | | | |
Federal | 1,575 |
| | (5,120 | ) |
State | 438 |
| | (602 | ) |
| 2,013 |
| | (5,722 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | (11,000 | ) | | 11,000 |
|
Total income taxes | $ | (9,329 | ) | | $ | 6,905 |
|
The following table presents the tax effects of significant components of the Company's net deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, | | December 31, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
| (in thousands) |
Deferred tax assets: | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 10,671 |
| | $ | 12,880 |
|
Other than temporary impairment | 807 |
| | 807 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 213 |
| | 276 |
|
OREO property | 1,594 |
| | 1,268 |
|
Net operating loss | 6,511 |
| | 7,281 |
|
Sidus goodwill | 953 |
| | 1,050 |
|
Other | 1,887 |
| | 1,798 |
|
| 22,636 |
| | 25,360 |
|
Less: Valuation Allowance | — |
| | (11,000 | ) |
| $ | 22,636 |
| | $ | 14,360 |
|
| | | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | |
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities | $ | (3,002 | ) | | $ | (2,387 | ) |
FMV adjustment related to mergers | (177 | ) | | (255 | ) |
Depreciation | (1,688 | ) | | (1,980 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | (358 | ) | | (327 | ) |
Core deposit intangible | (1,146 | ) | | (1,468 | ) |
Noncompete intangible | (149 | ) | | (149 | ) |
Other | (146 | ) | | (195 | ) |
| $ | (6,666 | ) | | $ | (6,761 | ) |
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 15,970 |
| | $ | 7,599 |
|
Our net deferred tax asset was $16.0 million at September 30, 2012 and $7.6 million at December 31, 2011. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
42
percent) that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. All available evidence, both positive and negative, is used in the consideration to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is required.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company reversed a previously recorded $11 million valuation allowance which had been established as a measure of caution in 2011 after falling into a 3-year cumulative loss position at that time. After review of all available evidence at June 30, 2012 and based on the weight of such evidence, the Company believed the realization of the deferred tax asset was more likely than not and reversed the previously recorded $11.0 million valuation allowance. The reversal of the allowance was based primarily on a return to profitability as the Company had reported four consecutive quarters of net income. Based on net income trends, projected net income over the next 36 months and improving credit quality metrics, no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of June 30, 2012.
At September 30, 2012, the Company considered the following negative and positive evidence in its evaluation of deferred tax assets:
| |
• | The Company is in a cumulative tax income position for the 3-year period ending September 30, 2012 of $1.7 million. Significance: High |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 Cumulative Loss Test |
| | 2009* | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012** | | Total |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | 6,545 |
| | $ | (1,402 | ) | | $ | (7,701 | ) | | $ | 5,897 |
| | $ | (3,206 | ) |
Goodwill impairment | | — |
| | — |
| | 4,944 |
| | — |
| | 4,944 |
|
| | $ | 6,545 |
| | $ | (1,402 | ) | | $ | (2,757 | ) | | $ | 5,897 |
| | $ | 1,738 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
*4th quarter of 2009
**First nine months of 2012
| |
• | The Company has recorded $14.7 million in taxable income for five previous consecutive quarters as credit quality has improved and net interest margin has increased over the past year. Credit quality has improved, including significant decreases in classified loans and nonperforming loans. Credit losses have shown a dramatic reduction in the second half of 2011 and continuing into 2012 with only $16.5 million in charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Significance: High |
| |
• | The Company's strong history of earnings since the inception of the Bank, and particularly over the 10 year period prior to the current economic cycle, shows the Company has historically been profitable and has no history of expiration of loss carryforwards. Significance: Moderate |
| |
• | Management is not aware of any unsettled circumstances that, if resolved, would adversely affect future operations or earnings. Significance: Low |
| |
• | Credit quality has improved over the past twelve months, including significant decreases in classified loans and nonperforming loans. Credit losses have shown a dramatic reduction in the second half of 2011 and continuing into 2012, with only $25.3 million in gross charge-offs over the past twelve months as compared to $39.8 million in the twelve prior months. Significance: Moderate |
| |
• | Federal net operating losses can be deducted over the twenty year carryforward period. Currently, management is projecting full utilization of these tax benefits within 3 years from December 31, 2011. The Company's loss carryforwards for the tax period ending December 31, 2012 include net operating loss carryforwards generated in the acquisition of Cardinal State Bank in 2008 and American Community Bank in 2009, as well as net operating loss carryforwards for the Company. The expiration of the loss carryforwards for the tax period ending December 31, 2012 are as follows: |
Significance: Moderate
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
43
|
| | | | | |
| Net Operating Loss Carryforward at December 31, 2011 | | Expiration |
| (in thousands) | | |
Cardinal State Bank acquisition | $ | 2,424 |
| | 2029 |
American Community Bank acquisition | 345 |
| | 2030 |
Yadkin Valley Federal Tax | 14,517 |
| | 2031 |
Yadkin Valley State Tax | 16,166 |
| | 2031 |
Total Loss Carryforwards | $ | 33,452 |
| | |
After review of all available evidence and based on the weight of such evidence, the Company believes the realization of the deferred tax asset is, more likely than not and no valuation allowance is deemed necessary at September 30, 2012 based primarily on a return to profitability (excluding projected losses related to management's de-risk plan) as the Company has reported five consecutive quarters of net income, net income trends, projected net income for the years 2013-2015 and improving credit quality metrics.
In October 2012, the Company announced a plan to reduce credit risk and reduce problem assets. As a result of this plan, the Company is projecting a loss for the year ended December 31, 2012. This loss will cause the Company to return to a cumulative loss position for the 3-year period ended. Although the Company estimates losses related to this effort will be between $40-45 million, the plan will help reduce problem assets that led to significant losses in the years 2010 and 2011 and capital raised as part of the Private Placement will better position the Company in the future. See Note 15 for further discussion on the Private Placement and de-risk plan. The Company has considered this potential transaction as part of our analysis of realizability of deferred tax assets at September 30, 2012 and concluded that it was still more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized and that no valuation allowance is necessary at September 30, 2012.
The following table presents a reconciliation of applicable income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 to the amount of tax expense computed at the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%:
|
| | | | | | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
| (in thousands) |
Tax expense (benefit) at statutory rate on income before income taxes | $ | 2,064 |
| | $ | (3,645 | ) |
Increases (decreases) resulting from: | | | |
Tax-exempt interest on investments | (589 | ) | | (651 | ) |
State income tax, net of federal benefits | 285 |
| | (391 | ) |
Income from bank-owned life insurance | (166 | ) | | (172 | ) |
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | (11,000 | ) | | 11,000 |
|
Other | 77 |
| | 764 |
|
Total income taxes | $ | (9,329 | ) | | $ | 6,905 |
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
44
15. Subsequent Events
On October 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors and directors and executive officers of the Company (collectively, the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Investors purchased 45,000 shares of the Company's Mandatorily Convertible Cumulative Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), at a price of $1,000 per share in a private placement (the “Private Placement”). The Series A Preferred Stock will convert into shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $2.80 per share upon shareholder approval. The Company raised approximately $41.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock.
As part of the Private Placement, contemporaneously with the execution of the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with certain holders (the “Preferred Shareholders”) of the Company's Series T Preferred Stock and Series T-ACB Preferred Stock, pursuant to which the Preferred Shareholders agreed, upon shareholder approval, to exchange shares of the Preferred Stock for shares of the Company's common stock and shares of a new class of non-voting common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company (the “non-voting common stock”). Upon shareholder approval, the total amount of Preferred Stock to be exchanged for common stock and non-voting common stock will be approximately $21 million. The non-voting common stock will convert into shares of the Company's common stock under certain conditions in accordance with the terms of the Articles of Amendment creating the class of the non-voting common stock.
In connection with the Private Placement, the Company intends to call a special meeting of shareholders (the “Special Meeting”) to be held on December 14, 2012 to, among other things: (i) create a class of non-voting and ii) approve, pursuant to the NASDAQ Rules, the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock into common stock and the exchange of the Series T Preferred Stock and the Series T-ACB Preferred Stock into common stock and non-voting common stock.
For additional information on the Private Placement, see the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on October 24, 2012.
Also, in conjunction with the Private Placement, the Company made the strategic decision to implement a plan to substantially reduce credit risk within the Bank's loan portfolio. This plan will include the transfer of certain substandard and nonperforming loans to loans held for sale, and significant losses on sale of foreclosed real estate. Losses on sale of assets related to the plan are expected to be approximately $40-45 million and are due to a discount to fair value for liquidation purposes. The Company is pursuing potential loan sale alternatives that are expected to result in the disposition of these assets prior to the calendar year end.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following is our discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements. This commentary should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and the other statistical information included in this report.
This report contains statements which constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements relate to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and business of our Company. Forward-looking statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors which are beyond our control. The words “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue,” “assume,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “forecast,” “goal,” and “estimate,” as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those described under the heading “Risk Factors” in our 2011 Form 10-K as filed with the SEC and the following:
| |
• | reduced earnings due to higher credit losses generally and specifically because losses in the sectors of our loan portfolio secured by real estate are greater than expected due to economic factors, including declining real estate values, increasing interest rates, increasing unemployment, or changes in payment behavior or other factors; |
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
45
| |
• | reduced earnings due to higher credit losses because our loans are concentrated by loan type, industry segment, borrower type, or location of the borrower or collateral; |
| |
• | the rate of delinquencies and amount of loans charged-off; |
| |
• | the adequacy of the level of our allowance for loan losses and the amount of loan loss provisions required in future periods; |
| |
• | results of examinations by our regulatory authorities, including the possibility that the regulatory authorities may, among other things, require us to increase our allowance for loan losses or writedown assets; |
| |
• | the amount of our loan portfolio collateralized by real estate, and the weakness in the commercial real estate market; |
| |
• | our efforts to raise capital or otherwise increase and maintain our regulatory capital ratios above the statutory and agreed upon minimums, including the impact of the proposed capital rules under Basel III; |
| |
• | the impact of our efforts to raise capital on our financial position, liquidity, capital, and profitability; |
| |
• | risks and uncertainties associated with the closing of the Private Placement, including the risk that we are unable to receive shareholder approval to (i) issue the shares of common stock resulting from the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, (ii) amend the Articles of Incorporation to create the non-voting common stock, (iii) issue shares of common stock and the non-voting common stock to certain of the Series T and Series T-ACB Preferred Shareholders in exchange for the Series T and Series T-ACB Preferred Stock, and (iv) issue the shares of common stock resulting from the conversion of the non-voting common stock; |
| |
• | risks and uncertainties relating to not successfully negotiating and entering into definitive agreements with respect to, and closing the, currently contemplated asset dispositions and the asset sales or accelerated foreclosed properties dispositions not occurring within our currently expected ranges for price and other terms, and the pre-tax charges associated with such sales exceeding the pre-tax charges that we currently anticipate; |
| |
• | the increase in the cost of capital of our Series A Preferred Stock if we do not obtain shareholder approval to convert the Series A Preferred Stock into common stock at the Special Meeting; |
| |
• | the increase in the cost of capital of our Series T and Series T-ACB Preferred Stock if we do not redeem within five years of the date of issuance; |
| |
• | adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses; |
| |
• | increased funding costs due to market illiquidity, increased competition for funding, and increased regulatory requirements with regard to funding; |
| |
• | significant increases in competitive pressure in the banking and financial services industries; |
| |
• | changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins; |
| |
• | changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment, including the effect of recent financial reform legislation on the banking industry; |
| |
• | general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally and especially in our primary service area, becoming less favorable than expected resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality; |
| |
• | our ability to retain our existing customers, including our deposit relationships; |
| |
• | changes occurring in business conditions and inflation; |
| |
• | changes in monetary and tax policies; |
| |
• | ability of borrowers to repay loans, which can be adversely affected by a number of factors, including changes in economic conditions, adverse trends or events affecting business industry groups, reductions in real estate values or markets, business closings or lay-offs, natural disasters, which could be exacerbated by potential climate change, and international instability; |
| |
• | changes in deposit flows; |
| |
• | changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; |
| |
• | changes in the assessment of whether a deferred tax valuation allowance is necessary; |
| |
• | our ability to maintain internal control over financial reporting; |
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
46
| |
• | our reliance on secondary sources such as FHLB advances, sales of securities and loans, federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banks and out-of-market time deposits, to meet our liquidity needs; |
| |
• | loss of consumer confidence and economic disruptions resulting from terrorist activities; |
| |
• | changes in the securities markets; and |
| |
• | other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC. |
These risks are exacerbated by the developments in national and international financial markets that have persisted over the past several years, and we are unable to predict what effect these uncertain market conditions will continue to have on us. There can be no assurance that these unprecedented developments will not continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have based our forward-looking statements on our current expectations about future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee you that these expectations will be achieved. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Overview
The following discussion describes our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and also analyzes our financial condition as of September 30, 2012 as compared to December 31, 2011. Like most community banks, we derive most of our income from interest we receive on our loans and investments. Our primary source of funds for making these loans and investments is our deposits, on which we pay interest. Consequently, one of the key measures of our success is our amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits. Another key measure is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities.
Of course, there are risks inherent in all loans, so we maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. We establish and maintain this allowance by charging a provision for loan losses against our operating earnings. In the following section, we have included a detailed discussion of this process.
In addition to earning interest on our loans and investments, we earn income through fees and other expenses we charge to our customers. We describe the various components of this noninterest income, as well as our noninterest expense, in the following discussion.
The following discussion and analysis also identifies significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements. We encourage you to read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and the other statistical information also included in this report.
The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or occurrences after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Changes in Financial Position
Total assets at September 30, 2012 were $1,920.4 million, a decrease of $72.8 million, or 3.7%, compared to assets of $1,993.2 million at December 31, 2011. The loan portfolio, net of allowance for losses, was $1,331.6 million compared to $1,418.1 million at December 31, 2011. Gross loans held-for-investment decreased by $92.1 million, or 6.3% as loans continue to paydown and the Company continues efforts to focus on credit quality. The allowance for loan losses decreased $5.6 million driven primarily by decreases in classified loans for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, decreased charge-offs in 2012 as compared to 2011, as well as an overall decrease in loans held-for-investment. Total watch list and substandard loans were $124.0 million as compared to $160.4 million as of December 31, 2011, a decrease of $36.4 million. Also, included in the first nine months of 2012 was a $1.1 million recovery of loan losses sustained in 2009. Although this recovery is included in net charge-off numbers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 it was not considered in the Company's calculation of allowance for loan losses. See Note 10 above entitled “Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses” for further discussion of the allowance for loan losses.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
47
During the first quarter of 2012, the decision was made by management to transfer a pass graded non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan in the amount of $7.6 million from loans held-for-investment to loans held-for-sale. As a result of this transfer, approximately $912,000 was charged-off in order to record the loan at fair value at time of transfer. This loan was sold on September 28, 2012 for a loss of $900,000. During the third quarter of 2012, another real estate loan in the amount of $5.0 million was transfered from loans held-for-investment to loans held-for-sale as management made the strategic decision to market the loan for sale. As a result of the transfer the Company charged-off $3.4 million in order to record the loan at fair value at the time of transfer. The loan was sold on September 21, 2012 with no gain or loss recorded on the sale.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale increased by $5.2 million, or 26.8%, from December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012 as the Bank continued its strategy of selling mortgage loans mostly to various investors with servicing rights released and to a lesser extent to the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation with servicing rights retained. This increase was the result of a larger pipeline at September 30, 2012, as well as an increase in fair value of loan commitments. These loans are normally held for a period of two to three weeks before being sold to investors. Mortgage loans closed in the first nine months of 2012 ranged from a low of $14.6 million in January 2012 to a high of $33.8 million in July 2012 and totaled $237.3 million at September 30, 2012. Mortgage loans closed during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $407.6 million.
The securities portfolio decreased from $330.4 million at December 31, 2011, to $310.6 million at September 30, 2012, a decrease of $19.9 million as mortgage-backed securities continue to pay down at an increased rate, and lower interest earning securities are sold. The portfolio is comprised of securities of U.S. government agencies (10.6%), mortgage-backed securities (71.4%), state and municipal securities (17.6%), and publicly traded common and preferred stocks (0.4%).
Other assets increased $4.3 million due largely to a reversal of the valuation allowance for deferred taxes of $11.0 million that occurred in June 2012, offset by a decrease in income taxes receivable. OREO decreased $2.7 million as the result of sales in the amount of $11.6 million, losses of $4.4 million offset by transfers in the amount of $13.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Premises and equipment decreased $660,000, or 1.57%.
Deposits decreased $79.9 million, or 4.6%, comparing September 30, 2012 to December 31, 2011. Overall, noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $26.5 million, or 11.5%, while NOW, savings, and money market accounts decreased $19.3 million, or 3.1%, certificates of deposit (“CODs”) over $100,000 decreased $18.0 million, or 5.0%, and other CODs decreased $69.0 million, or 13.4%. Management continues to focus on shifting the deposit mix from higher cost time deposits to lower cost demand and NOW accounts through the use of marketing efforts and interest rates.
Borrowed funds decreased $3.2 million, or 3.1%, comparing September 30, 2012 to December 31, 2011. Advances from FHLB and overnight borrowings decreased $1.8 million as the Company continued to paydown outstanding advances and repurchase agreements decreased $1.5 million. Long term borrowings included $35.0 million in trust preferred securities and advances from the FHLB of $25.3 million. The American Community merger added $10.4 million in trust preferred securities at a rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.80% and will mature in 2033. Yadkin Valley Statutory Trust I (“the Trust”) issued $25.8 million in trust preferred securities at a rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.32%. The trust preferred securities mature in 30 years, and can be called by the Trust without penalty.
Other liabilities, capital lease obligations and accrued interest payable combined decreased by $4.3 million, or 27.6%, from December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012. Decreases in other liabilities resulted primarily from a decrease in preferred dividends payable of $2.2 million, a decrease in accrued interest on trust preferred of $595,000, and a $873,000 decrease in accrued interest payable as average deposits and borrowings have decreased year-over-year.
At September 30, 2012, total shareholders' equity was $155.2 million, or a book value of $5.36 per common share, compared to $140.6 million, or a book value of $4.77 per common share, at December 31, 2011. The Company's equity to assets ratio was 8.08% and 7.05%, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Capital adequacy is an important indicator of financial stability and performance. In order to be considered “well capitalized”, a bank must exceed total risk-based capital ratios of 10%, and Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios of 6% and leverage ratios of 5%. In addition, we have committed to regulators that the Bank will maintain a Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 8%, which is higher than the statutory Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5% to be classified as well-capitalized. Our goal has been to maintain a “well-capitalized” status for the Bank since failure to meet or exceed this classification affects how regulatory applications for certain activities, including acquisitions, and continuation and expansion of existing activities, are evaluated and could make our customers and potential investors less confident in our Bank.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
48
The following table sets forth the Company's and the Bank's various capital ratios as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Company and the Bank exceeded the minimum regulatory capital ratios as of September 30, 2012, as well as the ratios to be considered "well capitalized."
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
| Holding Company | | Bank | | Holding Company | | Bank |
Total risk-based capital ratio | 12.6% | | 12.4% | | 11.8% | | 11.5% |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | 11.4% | | 11.2% | | 10.6% | | 10.2% |
Leverage ratio | 8.8% | | 8.7% | | 8.3% | | 7.9% |
Management of equity is a critical aspect of capital management in any business. The determination of the appropriate amount of equity for a regulated financial institution is affected by a number of factors, including but not limited to, the amount of capital needed to meet regulatory requirements, the amount of “risk equity” the business requires and balance sheet leverage.
As disclosed in Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), on October 23, 2012, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with certain accredited investors and directors and executive officers of the Company, pursuant to which the Investors purchased 45,000 shares of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $1,000 per share in the Private Placement. The net proceeds of the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock, after direct expenses of $3.2 million, were approximately $41.8 million of which approximately $2.0 million was retained by the Company and approximately $39.8 million was contributed to the Bank as a capital contribution.
In addition, as part of the Private Placement, contemporaneously with the execution of the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into the Exchange Agreement with the Preferred Shareholders, pursuant to which the Preferred Shareholders agreed, upon shareholder approval, to exchange certain shares of the Series T and Series T-ACB Preferred Stock for shares of the Company's common stock and shares of the Company's non-voting common stock.
In June 2012, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) approved three notices of proposed rulemaking (“NPRs”) to, among other things, implement the Basel III minimum capital requirements and capital conservation buffer. The three NPRs are expected to be published jointly by the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency after each agency has completed its approval process. The comment period on the NPRs ends on October 22, 2012. If approved in their current form, the NPRs would be effective over a phased-in period from 2013 to 2019. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the proposed rules on the Company and the Bank.
To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company and the Bank each must maintain minimum amounts and ratios. At September 30, 2012, the Company is well-capitalized for regulatory purposes both at the bank and holding company level, however the Bank has committed to regulators that it will maintain a Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 8% which it exceeded at September 30, 2012.
Liquidity, Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk
The Bank derives the majority of its liquidity from its core deposit base and to a lesser extent from wholesale borrowing. The balance sheet liquidity ratio, measured by the sum of cash (less reserve requirements), investments, and loans held-for-sale reduced by pledged securities, as compared to deposits and short-term borrowings, was 21.7% at September 30, 2012 compared to 19.1% at December 31, 2011. Additional liquidity is provided by $59.0 million in unused credit including federal funds purchased lines provided by correspondent banks as well as credit availability from the FHLB. In addition, the Bank has unpledged marketable securities of $223.3 million available for use as a source of collateral. At September 30, 2012, brokered deposits totaled $3.8 million, or 0.23% of total deposits. Brokered certificates of deposit are primarily short-term with maturities of nine months or less. The Bank also maintains a brokered deposit NOW account to add municipal deposits totaling $3.1 million at September 30, 2012.
The Bank contracted with Promontory Interfinancial Network ("Promontory") in 2008 for various services including wholesale COD funding. Promontory's CDARS® product, One-Way BuySM, enables the Bank to bid on a weekly basis through a private auction for COD terms ranging from four weeks to 260 weeks (approximately five years) with settlement available each Thursday. There were no outstanding funds acquired through the One-Way Buy product at September 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
49
Promontory also provides a product, CDARS® Reciprocal, which allows the Bank's customers to place funds in excess of the FDIC insurance limit with Promontory's network of participating Banks so that the customer is fully insured for the amount deposited. Promontory provides reciprocating funds to the Bank from funds placed at other banks by their customers. The Bank sets its customers' interest rates when they place deposits through the network and pays/receives the rate difference to/from the other banks whose reciprocal funds are held by the Bank. The overall impact of this process is that the Bank effectively pays the rate offered to its relationship customer. Therefore, the Bank does not consider these funds to be wholesale or brokered funds. In compliance with FDIC reporting requirements, the Bank includes reciprocal deposits as brokered deposits in its quarterly Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Call Report. At September 30, 2012, CDARS® reciprocal deposits totaled $824,000, compared to $2.1 million at December 31, 2011.
Management continues to assess interest rate risk internally and by utilizing outside sources. The balance sheet is asset sensitive over a three-month period, meaning that there will be more assets than liabilities immediately repricing as market rates change. Over a period of twelve months, the balance sheet remains slightly asset sensitive. We generally would benefit from increasing market interest rates when we have an asset-sensitive, or a positive interest rate gap, and we would generally benefit from decreasing market interest rates when we have liability-sensitive, or a negative interest rate gap.
The Company currently has derivative instrument contracts consisting of interest rate swaps and interest rate lock commitments and commitments to sell mortgages. The primary objective for each of these contracts is to minimize interest rate risk. The Company's strategy is to use derivative contracts to stabilize and improve net interest margin and net interest income currently and in future periods. The Company has no market risk sensitive instruments held for trading purposes. The Company's exposure to market risk is reviewed regularly by management.
Results of Operations
Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 was $757,000 before preferred dividends, compared to net income of $3.7 million in the same period of 2011. Net loss to common shareholders for the three-month period ended September 30, 2012 was $81,000. Net income to common shareholders for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 was $2.9 million. Basic and diluted income per common share were $0.00 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2012. Basic and diluted income per common share were $0.15 for the three month period ended September 30, 2011. On an annualized basis, third quarter results represent a return on average assets of (0.02)% at September 30, 2012 compared to 0.56% at September 30, 2011, and a return on average equity of (0.21)% compared to 8.49% at September 30, 2011.
Net income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 was $15.2 million before preferred dividends, compared to a net loss of $17.3 million in the same period of 2011. Net income available to common shareholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $12.7 million, compared to a net loss to common shareholders of $19.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Basic and diluted earnings per common share were $0.66 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Basic and diluted losses per common share were $1.09 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. On an annualized basis, year-to-date results represent a return on average assets of 0.87% at September 30, 2012 compared to (1.21)% at September 30, 2011, and a return on average equity of 11.57% compared to (18.27)% at September 30, 2011.
Certain income and expense items have been reclassified for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 for comparability due to a change in the Company's mortgage banking segment reporting as of September 30, 2012.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the largest contributor to earnings, decreased $436,000, or 2.8%, to $15.2 million in the third quarter of 2012, compared with $15.6 million in the same period of 2011. The overall decrease in net interest income was primarily due to a decrease in interest income on loans of 8.3% as average loan balances are down 9% from the prior year and loan yields continue to be depressed by nonaccrual loans. This decrease in net interest income was offset by a 28% decrease in interest expense as higher costs time deposits have decreased 9.9% since December 31, 2011. The net interest margin increased to 3.37% in the third quarter of 2012 from 3.29% in the third quarter of 2011. The increase in net interest margin is primarily related to a decrease in deposit yields. Deposit yields have decreased as management focused efforts on shifting the deposit mix from higher cost time deposits to lower cost interest bearing NOW and money market accounts. The Company maintains an asset-sensitive position with respect to the impact of changing rates on net interest income.
Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased to $46.2 million from $46.9 million when compared to the same period in 2011 again due primarily to a decrease in interest income on loans of 10.1% as average loan balances are down from the prior year and loan yields continue to be depressed by nonaccrual loans.. The net interest margin increased to
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
50
3.46% in the first nine months of 2012 from 3.18% in the first nine months of 2011. Excluding the accretion of acquisition related fair market value adjustments, net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased to 3.44% as compared to 3.12% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The Company maintains an asset-sensitive position with respect to the impact of changing rates on net interest income.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
| Average | | | | Yield/ | | Average | | | | Yield/ |
Interest Rates Earned and Paid | Balance | | Interest | | Rate | | Balance | | Interest | | Rate |
Interest-earning assets: | (Dollars in thousands) |
Interest-bearing deposits and | | | | | | | | | | | |
federal funds sold | $ | 70,650 |
| | $ | 127 |
| | 0.24 | % | | $ | 151,137 |
| | $ | 299 |
| | 0.26 | % |
Investment securities (1) | 337,414 |
| | 6,161 |
| | 2.44 | % | | 307,654 |
| | 7,266 |
| | 3.16 | % |
Total loans (1)(2)(6)(8) | 1,411,072 |
| | 54,726 |
| | 5.18 | % | | 1,553,468 |
| | 60,901 |
| | 5.25 | % |
Total interest-earning assets | 1,819,136 |
| | 61,014 |
| | 4.48 | % | | 2,012,259 |
| | 68,466 |
| | 4.55 | % |
Non-earning assets | 125,398 |
| | | | | | 155,488 |
| | | | |
Total assets | $ | 1,944,534 |
| | | | | | $ | 2,167,747 |
| |
| | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Deposits (7): | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW and money market | $ | 553,199 |
| | $ | 1,208 |
| | 0.29 | % | | $ | 550,217 |
| | $ | 2,768 |
| | 0.67 | % |
Savings | 63,487 |
| | 68 |
| | 0.14 | % | | 56,354 |
| | 79 |
| | 0.19 | % |
Time certificates | 830,533 |
| | 10,973 |
| | 1.76 | % | | 1,063,044 |
| | 16,189 |
| | 2.04 | % |
Total interest bearing deposits | 1,447,219 |
| | 12,249 |
| | 1.13 | % | | 1,669,615 |
| | 19,036 |
| | 1.52 | % |
Repurchase agreements sold | 40,820 |
| | 217 |
| | 0.71 | % | | 41,210 |
| | 317 |
| | 1.03 | % |
Borrowed funds (7) | 66,470 |
| | 1,475 |
| | 2.96 | % | | 65,490 |
| | 1,333 |
| | 2.61 | % |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 1,554,509 |
| | 13,941 |
| | 1.20 | % | | 1,776,315 |
| | 20,686 |
| | 1.55 | % |
Non-interest bearing deposits | 237,513 |
| | | | | | 226,422 |
| | | | |
Shareholders' equity | 146,569 |
| | | | | | 143,309 |
| | | | |
Other liabilities | 5,943 |
| | | | | | 21,701 |
| | | | |
Total average liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 1,944,534 |
| | | | | | $ | 2,167,747 |
| | | | |
Net interest income (3) and interest rate spread (5) | | | $ | 47,073 |
| | 3.28 | % | | | | $ | 47,780 |
| | 3.00 | % |
Net interest margin (4) | | | | | 3.46 | % | | | | | | 3.18 | % |
__________________________
| |
(1) | Yields related to investment securities and loans exempt from Federal income taxes are stated on a fully tax-equivalent basis, assuming a Federal income tax rate of 35%. The calculation includes an adjustment for the nondeductible portion of interest expense |
| |
(2) | The loan average includes loans on which accrual of interest has been discontinued. |
| |
(3) | The net interest income is the difference between income from earning assets and interest expense. |
| |
(4) | Net interest margin is net interest income divided by total average earning assets. |
| |
(5) | Interest spread is the difference between the average interest rate received on earning assets and the average interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
| |
(6) | Interest income on loans for 2012 and 2011 includes $157 and $499, respectively, in accretion of fair market value adjustments related to mergers. |
| |
(7) | Interest expense on deposits and borrowings in 2012 and 2011 includes $11 and $322, respectively, in accretion of fair market value adjustments related to mergers. |
| |
(8) | Certain amounts in the current and prior periods have been reclassified based on a change in segment reporting for mortgage banking activities. |
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
51
Provisions and Allowance for Loan Losses
Adequacy of the allowance or reserve for loan losses of the Bank is a significant estimate that is based on management's assumptions regarding, among other factors, general and local economic conditions, which are difficult to predict and are beyond the Bank's control. In estimating these loss reserve levels, management also considers the financial conditions of specific borrowers and credit concentrations with specific borrowers, groups of borrowers, and industries.
The allowance for loan losses was $27.2 million at September 30, 2012, or 2.00% of loans held-for-investment, as compared to $32.8 million, or 2.26% of loans held-for-investment, at December 31, 2011. Decreases in the allowance for loan losses were due to decreased charge-offs in the first nine months of 2012, decreased criticized loans and an overall decrease in gross loans since December 31, 2011. Decreases in criticized loans were due to improvements in loans 30-89 days past due, payoffs and overall improvements in underlying credit exposures.
The allowance model is applied to the loan portfolio quarterly to determine the specific allowance balance for impaired loans and the general allowance balance for performing loans grouped by loan type. Out of the $27.2 million in total allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2012, the specific allowance for impaired loans accounted for $3.8 million, down from $4.1 million at year end as collateral dependent impaired loans are charged down to fair value. The remaining general allowance, $23.4 million, was attributed to performing loans and was down from $28.7 million at year end. The general allowance, as a percent of loans not individually reviewed for impairment was 1.81% as of September 30, 2012 as compared to 2.09% as of December 31, 2011. The decrease in the general allowance was driven primarily by a decrease in charge-offs, as well as a decrease in substandard and watch loans of $36.4 million which resulted from additional impairments loans, for which specific allowances are now calculated, as well as a few significant payoffs and improvements in past dues and underlying credit exposures of previously classified loans. Also contributing to the decrease in the general allowance for loan losses was a 6.3% decrease in gross loans as of September 30, 2012 as compared to December 31, 2011. These decreases in allowances led to decreased provisions in many of the loan types including negative provisions for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 for commercial and 1-4 family mortgage loans as nonaccruals and classified loans in these categories decreased.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2012, the Company changed its method of calculating the historical loss experience to incorporate a methodology that takes into consideration the probability of loss for each loan type and credit quality, and historical losses given default. This process not only helps break out loans by risk, but also looks at the migration of the credit quality over a period of two years. The impact of this change to the allowance for loan losses was an increase of $1.4 million in the general reserve allocation.
Net loan charge offs were $5.8 million, or 1.66% (annualized), of average loans, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $3.9 million, or 1.04% (annualized), of average loans for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in charge-offs for the quarter was due primarily to the charge-down by $3.4 million of one loan transferred to held-for-sale at fair value. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net loan charge offs were $14.4 million, or 1.36% (annualized) of average loans compared to $21.3 million, or 1.84% (annualized) of average loans, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Management considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover the estimated losses inherent in the Bank's loan portfolio as of September 30, 2012. No assurance can be given in this regard, however, especially considering the overall weakness in the commercial real estate market in the Bank's market areas. Management believes it has established the allowance in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and will consider future changes to the allowance that may be necessary based on changes in economic and other conditions. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank's allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the recognition of adjustments to the allowances based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examinations.
Management realizes that general economic trends greatly affect loan losses. The continued downturn in the real estate market has resulted in increased loan delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, and we believe that these trends are likely to continue. In some cases, this downturn has resulted in a significant impairment to the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. Collateral value is assessed based on collateral value trends, liquidation value trends, and other liquidation expenses to determine logical and credible discounts that may be needed. In response to this deterioration in real estate loan quality, management is aggressively monitoring its classified loans and is continuing to monitor credits with significant weaknesses. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. If real estate values continue to decline, it is also more likely that we would be required to increase our allowance for loan losses and our net charge-offs which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Assurances cannot be made either (1) that further charges to the allowance
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
52
account will not be significant in relation to the normal activity or (2) that further evaluation of the loan portfolio based on prevailing conditions may not require sizable additions to the allowance and charges to provision expense.
Our real estate portfolio has approximately $147.4 million of construction loans, $577.8 million of commercial real estate loans, $174.7 million in first lien mortgage loans, $196.5 million in home equity lines of credit and $38.0 million in multifamily mortgage loans as of September 30, 2012. We consider our construction and junior lien mortgage loans our riskiest loans within our real estate portfolio. Construction loans are typically comprised of loans to borrowers for real estate to be developed into properties such as sub-divisions or speculative houses. The majority of these borrowers are still having financial difficulties. Normally, these loans are repaid with the proceeds from the sale of the developed property. In addition, management continues to evaluate closely junior lien mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit. Given the slow economic recovery and depressed real estate values the Company recognizes that it will experience some loss in these portfolios, and management continues to monitor borrower financials, LTVs, and first lien positions. The significance of both construction and commercial real estate loans to our overall loan portfolio has caused us to apply a greater degree of scrutiny in analyzing the ultimate collectability of amounts due. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when the loan is past due 90 days or when it is apparent that the collection of principal and/or interest is doubtful. Net charge-offs (recoveries) of construction and commercial real estate loans were $7.5 million and $4.1 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net charge-offs (recoveries) of construction and commercial real estate loans were $7.3 million and $6.7 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2012, $5.8 million of our real estate loans had interest reserves including both borrower and bank funded, compared to $15.9 million as of December 31, 2011. There is a risk that an interest reserve could mask problems with a borrower's willingness and ability to repay the debt consistent with the terms and conditions of the loan obligation, therefore the Company has implemented review policies and internal controls to identify and monitor all loans with interest reserves.
Nonperforming Assets
Total nonperforming assets (which includes nonaccrual loans, loans over 90 days past due but still accruing, and foreclosed real estate) decreased from $95.3 million to $79.3 million as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, respectively. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets decreased to 4.12% as of September 30, 2012 as compared to 4.78% as of December 31, 2011, due primarily to a decrease in nonaccrual loans and a decrease in total assets since December 31, 2011. Total nonaccrual loans decreased from $70.4 million, or 4.78% of total loans, at December 31, 2011 to $57.1 million, or 4.12% of total loans, at September 30, 2012. The decreases in nonaccrual and impaired loans are the result of charge-offs and foreclosures, as well as upgrades. We have analyzed our nonperforming loans to determine what we believe is the amount needed to reserve in the allowance for loan losses based on an assessment of the collateral value or discounted cash flows of the loan. We have downgraded loans for which the probability of collection is uncertain and written down OREO property values where net realizable values have declined. Specific allowance for nonperforming loans accounted for $3.8 million, down from $4.1 million at year end, due to the charge-off of collateral dependent impaired loans to fair value.
Approximately 44% of loans in nonaccrual status are currently not past due 30 days or more. The total number of loans on nonaccrual has decreased from 505 to 441 since December 31, 2011. The average nonaccrual loan balance is $127,000 and $143,000 as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, respectively. At September 30, 2012, 84% of the nonaccrual loans were secured by real estate.
The largest amount of nonaccrual loans for one customer totaled $5.5 million and included loans utilized for the purchase of land, equipment and operating expenses. Total reserves for the relationship were $642,115 at September 30, 2012. Nonaccrual loans also include three other large relationships totaling $3.4 million, $2.2 million and $1.8 million. The first relationship consists of various loans utilized for the purchase and refinance of real estate, equipment and the operating expenses with reserves of $989,827. The second relationship consists of acreage held for sale with a reserve of $900,500. The third relationship is a loan secured by a low rise multi-tenant office flex building with $283,500 in reserves assigned to it. These loans have been placed in nonaccrual status because of concerns for the customers' continued ability to pay, collateral deterioration and depressed future industry outlook.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income consists of all revenues that are not included in interest and fee income related to earning assets. Total noninterest income decreased approximately $558,000, or 10.7%, comparing the third quarters of 2012 and 2011. A loss of $900,000 on the sale of loan made up the majority of the decrease. Offsetting the decrease was an increase in mortgage banking activities of $416,000. Other changes in noninterest income include the following:
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
53
| |
• | Service charges on deposit accounts decreased by $145,000, or 9.9%, as commercial NSF fees decreased $109,000 and service charges on non-interest checking accounts decreased $25,000. |
| |
• | Other service fees increased $20,000 when comparing the second quarter of 2012 to the prior year due primarily to an increase in net ATM and debit card interchange fees of $15,000. |
| |
• | Net gain on sale of investment securities decreased $208,000. |
| |
• | Income on investment in bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) decreased by $8,000, or 4.8%, during the three month period ended September 30, 2012, as the calculation for cost of benefits was updated in the second half of 2011 based on current employee and insurance information. |
| |
• | Mortgage banking income increased approximately $416,000 for the quarter. Although mortgage production decreased when comparing 2012 and 2011, net returns on sales increased as the Company exited less profitable wholesale markets. |
| |
• | Loss on sale of loans increased $900,000 as compared to the prior year as the Company sold a loan held-for-sale at a loss during the quarter. |
| |
• | Other income increased by approximately $193,000, or 214.4%, for the quarter as the Company received a $127,000 settlement on rental income owed from the cancellation of leased rental property. |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, total noninterest income decreased approximately $1,190,000, or 8.6%, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. A decrease in gains on sale of investments of $430,000 and $900,000 loss on the sale of loans made up the majority of the decrease. Other changes in noninterest income include the following:
| |
• | Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $74,000, or 1.9%, as service charges on non-interest checking accounts (a major component of service charges) decreased $95,000. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in NSF (including overdraft privilege) of $27,000. |
| |
• | The increase in other service fees of $64,000 was due primarily to an increase in ATM and debit card interchange fees of $223,000. This increase was partially offset by a $176,000 decrease in annuity and mutual fund commissions for the year. |
| |
• | Net gain on sale of investment securities decreased $430,000, or 20.7%. |
| |
• | Income on investment in bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) decreased by $18,000, or 3.7%, during the Nine months ended September 30, 2012, as the calculation for cost of benefits was updated based on current employee and insurance information. |
| |
• | Mortgage banking activities decreased approximately $30,000, or 0.7% for the Nine months ended September 30, 2012 as the Company decided to exit the wholesale market during the second quarter of 2011. |
| |
• | Loss on sale of loans increased $900,000 as compared to the prior year as the Company sold a loan held-for-sale at a loss during the quarter. |
| |
• | Other income increased by approximately $82,000, or 24.6%, as the Company received a $127,000 settlement on rental income owed from the cancellation of leased rental property. This increase was offset partially by a decrease on other divided income of $33,000. |
Noninterest Expense
Total noninterest expenses were $14.8 million for the third quarter of 2012, compared to $12.8 million in the same period of 2011, an increase of $2.0 million, or 15.3%. Noninterest expense includes salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment expenses, and all other operating costs. Noninterest expense to average assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 0.76%, and 0.62%, respectively. Efficiency ratios for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were 72.21% and 59.60%, respectively. The efficiency ratio is the ratio of noninterest expenses less amortization of intangibles to the total of the taxable equivalent net interest income and noninterest income. Noninterest expenses were $44.1 million for the Nine months
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
54
ended September 30, 2012, compared to $53.9 million for the same period of 2011, a decrease of $9.8 million or 18.1%. Efficiency ratios for the Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were 72.56% and 86.18%, respectively. The largest contributor to the increased noninterest expense in the first nine months of 2011 was a $4.9 million goodwill impairment writedown.
The following is a summary of the fluctuations for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 as compared to September 30, 2011.
| |
• | Quarter-to-date, salaries and employee benefit expenses increased by $841,000, or 13.8%. The major components of this increase are summarized as follows: Salaries and wages decreased $337,000 due to personnel reductions. Offsetting this decrease was a $597,000 increase in other miscellaneous personnel costs which include BOLI expenses and recruiting fees and a $400,000 increase in commissions as mortgage and investment activity have increased. |
| |
• | Year-to-date, salaries and employee benefit expenses decreased by $2.0 million, or 9.5%. The major components of this decrease are summarized as follows: Salaries and wages decreased by $2.5 million due to decreases in personnel and the accrual of $552,000 in severance costs related to branch closures in the prior year. Related payroll taxes also decreased $180,000. Other personnel expenses, which include BOLI expenses and recruiter fees increased $605,000. Deferral of salaries and benefit costs related to loan originations (which directly offset salary expense), increased $117,000. Commission expenses increased by $371,000 as mortgage and investment activity increased. |
| |
• | Occupancy and equipment expenses decreased by $167,000, or 8.5%, for the quarter and $1.0 million, or (15.9)% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 due to lease termination costs accrued in 2011which resulted from branch and office closures in 2010 and 2011. |
| |
• | Printing and supplies increased by $27,000, or 19.1%, comparing the third quarter 2012 with the third quarter 2011 as the Company. Year-to-date printing and supplies expense decreased $15,000, or 3.1%. |
| |
• | Data processing expense increased $52,000, or 12.9%, for the quarter and $137,000, or 11.8% year-to-date due to normal fluctuations in transaction volume and timing. |
| |
• | Communication expense decreased $58,000, or 15.6%, for the third quarter of 2012 compared to the third quarter of 2011, while year-to-date communication expense decreased $272,000, or 21.1%. |
| |
• | FDIC assessment expenses increased $571,000 for the quarter and decreased $753,000 year-to-date. Changes in the calculation of assessments beginning in the third quarter of 2011 led to decreased cost overall and a decrease in expense for the third quarter of 2011 as prepaid amounts were sufficient to cover costs. |
| |
• | Net cost of operation of other real estate owned increased $563,000 compared to the third quarter of 2011 as additional writedowns in the amount of $1.4 million were taken during the quarter. Net cost of operation of other real estate owned increased $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the prior year. During 2012, the Company has recorded additional writedowns of $4.3 million which resulted from continued declines in real estate values. |
| |
• | Loan collection fees decreased $310,000, or 81.8%, compared to the third quarter of 2011, and decreased $775,000, or 60.3%, year-to-date as past dues and classified loans have shown improvement year-over-year. |
| |
• | Other professional fees increased $273,000 for the quarter and $446,000 year-to-date when compared to the prior year as the Company has engaged in several new projects for 2012 due to increasing burden of regulatory. |
| |
• | Loss on sale of premises and equipment decreased $286,000 for the quarter and $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 due to the fact that the Company recorded significant writedowns on buildings and furniture as the Company entered into contracts to sell property and equipment in the prior year. |
| |
• | Quarter-to-date other operating expenses increased by $480,000, or 25.7%. The largest increase was a $216,000 increase in attorney fees for the quarter. Other increases include a $122,000 increase in training expense as the Company embarked on a new training program in 2012 for all employees, and a $120,000 increase in appraisal fees as credit administration ordered updated appraisals on large impaired loans. |
| |
• | Year-to-date other operating expenses decreased approximately $282,000 or 4.1%. Decreases include a $304,000 decrease in other taxes (including franchise and privilege tax), a $121,000 decrease in other outside service costs |
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
55
and a $95,000 decrease in audit and accounting fees. These decreases were offset by an increase in training expense of $547,000 as the Company embarked on a new training program for all employees, and a $295,000 increase in attorney fees year-over-year.
Income Tax Expense
The Company recorded an income tax expense (benefit) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 of $54,000 and $(9.3) million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $771,000 and $2.2 million, respectively. The decrease in income tax benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily due to the reversal of the valuation allowance for deferred taxes in the second quarter. The reversal of the allowance was based primarily on a return to profitability as the Company has reported four consecutive quarters of net income, projected net income over the next 12 months and improving credit quality metrics. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was (158.2)% as compared to 66.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. See footnote 14 in the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of income tax expense and deferred tax assets.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. Our market risk arises principally from interest rate risk inherent in our lending, deposit, and borrowing activities. Management actively monitors and manages its interest rate risk exposure. In addition to other risks that we manage in the normal course of business, such as credit quality and liquidity, management considers interest rate risk to be a significant market risk that could potentially have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The information contained in Item 2 in the section captioned "Liquidity, Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk" is incorporated herein by reference. Other types of market risks, such as foreign currency risk and commodity price risk, do not arise in the normal course of our business activities. The acquisition of American Community and expansion into new market areas in North and South Carolina have marketing risks that are mitigated by retaining the American Community brand name in these markets. Credit risk associated with loans acquired in the merger are part of the overall discussion of credit risk in the sections captioned “Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Non-Performing Assets.”
The primary objective of asset and liability management is to manage interest rate risk and achieve reasonable stability in net interest income throughout interest rate cycles. This is achieved by maintaining the proper balance of rate-sensitive earning assets and rate-sensitive interest-bearing liabilities. The relationship of rate-sensitive earning assets to rate-sensitive interest-bearing liabilities is the principal factor in projecting the effect that fluctuating interest rates will have on future net interest income. Rate-sensitive assets and liabilities are those that can be repriced to current market rates within a relatively short time period. Management monitors the rate sensitivity of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities over the entire life of these instruments, but places particular emphasis on the next twelve months. Following a period of rate increases (or decreases) net interest income will increase (or decrease) over both a three-month and a twelve-month period.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective (1) to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (2) to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
56
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The Company reviews its disclosure controls and procedures, which may include its internal control over financial reporting, on an ongoing basis, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that the Company's systems evolve with its business.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
57
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are not a party to, nor are any of our properties subject to, any material legal proceedings, other than legal proceedings that we believe are routine litigation incidental to our business.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| | |
Exhibit # | | Description |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification |
32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification |
101 | | The following financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.(1) |
_________________
| |
(1) | As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under those sections. |
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
58
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
|
| | |
BY: | | /s/ Joseph H. Towell |
| | Joseph H. Towell, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
BY: | | /s/ Jan H. Hollar |
| | Jan H. Hollar, Principal Accounting Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
October 25, 2012
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report September 30, 2012
59