XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 4—Fair Value Measurements

 

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements.  ASC Topic 820 addresses fair value GAAP for financial assets and financial liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period and for non-financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

 

In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are “unobservable data points” for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

 

The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels identified under ASC Topic 820, the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Significant

    

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

Quoted Prices

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

Recorded

 

in Active Markets

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

on Balance

 

for Identical Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Sheet

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Assets as of June 30, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

111,676

 

$

111,676

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Liabilities as of June 30, 2017: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

1,213

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

1,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets as of December 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

135,823

 

$

135,823

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Liabilities as of December 31, 2016: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    None

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other financial instruments of the Company not listed in the table consist of accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities.  These financial instruments generally approximate fair value based on their short-term nature.  The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value based on comparison with current prevailing market rates for loans of similar risks and maturities. 

 

The following table provides changes to the Company’s contingent consideration liability Level 3 fair value measurements during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

 

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Contingent Consideration Liability

    

2017

    

2016

 

Beginning balance, January 1,

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Additions to contingent consideration liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Florida Gas Contractors acquisition

 

 

1,200

 

 

 —

 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability during year

 

 

13

 

 

 —

 

Ending balance, June 30, 

 

$

1,213

 

$

 —

 

 

On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses the estimated fair value of the contractual obligation to pay the contingent consideration and any changes in estimated fair value are recorded as a non-operating charge in the Company’s statement of income.  Fluctuations in the fair value of contingent consideration are impacted by two unobservable inputs, management’s estimate of the probability of the acquired company meeting the contractual operating performance target and the estimated discount rate (a rate that approximates the Company’s cost of capital). Significant changes in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a different fair value measurement.  Generally, a change in the assumption of the probability of meeting the performance target is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the fair value of contingent consideration liability, whereas a change in assumption used of the estimated discount rate is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the fair value of contingent consideration liability.