UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012.

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             .

Commission file number: 333-133895

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	16-1732152
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

6 High Ridge Park

Stamford, CT 06905

(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(203) 956-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, as of July 25, 2012 was 100.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.		1
Financial Statements		1
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		1
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		2
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Deficit for the Six Months Ended June  30, 2012 and Year Ended December 31, 2011		3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June  30, 2012 and 2011		4
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		35
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		56
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures		57
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION		58
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings		58
Item 1A.
Risk Factors		58
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity in Securities and Use of Proceeds		60
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities		60
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosure		60
Item 5.
Other Information		60
Item 6.
Exhibits		60
SIGNATURES		S-1

i

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 AND DECEMBER 31, 2011

(In millions, except share amounts)

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	48.5		$	86.3
Restricted cash		35.2			30.4
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.7 and $2.4, respectively)		148.5			126.8
Receivables from related parties		0.1			0.8
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		72.2			74.0
Prepaid commissions		47.3			52.6
Income taxes receivable		1.0			2.1
Other current assets		70.4			68.1
Total current assets		423.2			441.1
Property and equipment, net		133.9			134.7
Contract rights and list fees, net		23.0			22.5
Goodwill		595.0			627.5
Other intangibles, net		268.0			351.2
Other non-current assets		64.9			74.0
Total assets	$	1,508.0		$	1,651.0
Liabilities and Deficit
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	11.8		$	11.9
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		399.3			398.1
Payables to related parties		38.0			35.3
Deferred revenue		129.9			152.5
Income taxes payable		3.3			3.4
Total current liabilities		582.3			601.2
Long-term debt		1,917.2			1,922.5
Deferred income taxes		68.2			67.5
Deferred revenue		16.0			17.8
Other long-term liabilities		40.5			53.7
Total liabilities		2,624.2			2,662.7
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Deficit
Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, and 100 shares issued and outstanding		102.6			139.6
Accumulated deficit		(1,223.7	)		(1,157.5	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3.6			5.2
Total Affinion Group, Inc. deficit		(1,117.5	)		(1,012.7	)
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary		1.3			1.0
Total deficit		(1,116.2	)		(1,011.7	)
Total liabilities and deficit	$	1,508.0		$	1,651.0

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

(In millions)

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
Net revenues	$	377.6		$	387.1		$	759.4		$	754.0
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		150.8			159.9			305.6			303.8
Operating costs		115.3			109.2			233.4			217.2
General and administrative		44.1			44.6			66.1			97.4
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		39.7			—			39.7			—
Facility exit costs		—			1.3			—			1.3
Depreciation and amortization		49.0			61.4			99.1			122.9
Total expenses		398.9			376.4			743.9			742.6
Income (loss) from operations		(21.3	)		10.7			15.5			11.4
Interest income		0.2			0.6			0.5			0.8
Interest expense		(36.9	)		(38.9	)		(74.5	)		(74.7	)
Other expense, net		(0.4	)		(0.1	)		(0.3	)		(0.1	)
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(58.4	)		(27.7	)		(58.8	)		(62.6	)
Income tax expense		(4.3	)		(0.2	)		(7.0	)		(4.7	)
Net loss		(62.7	)		(27.9	)		(65.8	)		(67.3	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		(0.4	)		(0.5	)
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(62.9	)	$	(28.2	)	$	(66.2	)	$	(67.8	)
Net loss	$	(62.7	)	$	(27.9	)	$	(65.8	)	$	(67.3	)
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax		(4.0	)		1.2			(1.7	)		3.7
Comprehensive loss		(66.7	)		(26.7	)		(67.5	)		(63.6	)
Less: comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.1	)		(0.3	)		(0.3	)		(0.5	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(66.8	)	$	(27.0	)	$	(67.8	)	$	(64.1	)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN DEFICIT

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011

(In millions)

	Affinion Group, Inc. Deficit
	Common Stock and  Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Non- Controlling Interest			Total Deficit
Balance, January 1, 2012	$	139.6		$	(1,157.5	)	$	5.2		$	1.0		$	(1,011.7	)
Net income (loss)					(66.2	)					0.4			(65.8	)
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax								(1.6	)		(0.1	)		(1.7	)
Return of capital		(37.0	)											(37.0	)
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	102.6		$	(1,223.7	)	$	3.6		$	1.3		$	(1,116.2	)

	Affinion Group, Inc. Deficit
	Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Non- Controlling Interest			Total Deficit
Balance, January 1, 2011	$	172.1		$	(1,047.8	)	$	9.5		$	1.3		$	(864.9	)
Net income (loss)					(109.7	)					0.9			(108.8	)
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax								(4.3	)		(0.2	)		(4.5	)
Dividend paid to non-controlling interest											(1.0	)		(1.0	)
Return of capital		(323.2	)											(323.2	)
Capital contribution		290.7												290.7
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	139.6		$	(1,157.5	)	$	5.2		$	1.0		$	(1,011.7	)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

(In millions)

	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(65.8	)	$	(67.3	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		99.1			122.9
Amortization of debt discount and financing costs		4.2			4.1
Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate swaps		1.0			(0.7	)
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		39.7			—
Adjustment to liability for additional consideration based on earn-out		(14.6	)		—
Facility exit costs		—			1.3
Share-based compensation		6.2			6.3
Deferred income taxes		2.0			1.4
Payment received for assumption of loyalty points program liability		—			0.5
Net change in assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(5.0	)		(1.3	)
Receivables		(22.1	)		(2.9	)
Receivables from related parties		0.7			0.1
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		1.8			(3.2	)
Prepaid commissions		5.4			2.0
Other current assets		(2.6	)		7.0
Contract rights and list fees		(0.7	)		(2.9	)
Other non-current assets		3.8			5.7
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		4.3			(35.9	)
Payables to related parties		(3.5	)		(4.4	)
Deferred revenue		(24.5	)		(2.6	)
Income taxes receivable and payable		1.0			5.5
Other long-term liabilities		1.5			(5.2	)
Other, net		1.8			(2.0	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		33.7			28.4
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(27.2	)		(24.9	)
Restricted cash		0.2			1.1
Acquisition-related payments, net of cash acquired		(1.2	)		(3.6	)
Cash acquired in Webloyalty acquisition		—			26.1
Other investing activity		—			0.3
Net cash used in investing activities		(28.2	)		(1.0	)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of term loan		—			250.0
Principal payments on borrowings		(5.9	)		(5.9	)
Financing costs		—			(5.5	)
Repurchase of employee equity award of a subsidiary		—			(3.5	)
Return of capital to parent company		(37.0	)		(323.2	)
Receivables from and payables to parent company		—			16.1
Distribution to non-controlling interest of a subsidiary		—			(1.1	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(42.9	)		(73.1	)
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		(0.4	)		1.4

4

	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(37.8	)		(44.3	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		86.3			121.1
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	48.5		$	76.8
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest payments	$	74.6		$	74.1
Income tax payments, net of refunds	$	4.1		$	0.8
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Accrued capital expenditures	$	0.3		$	1.0
Contribution of Affinion Holdings equity instruments used for Webloyalty acquisition	$	—		$	290.7
Property and equipment acquired under capital lease	$	—		$	0.9

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND BUSINESS DESCRIPTION

Basis of Presentation—On October 17, 2005, Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) completed the sale of the Cendant Marketing Services Division (the “Predecessor”) to Affinion Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Affinion”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (“Affinion Holdings”) and an affiliate of Apollo Global Management, LLC (“Apollo”), pursuant to a purchase agreement dated July 26, 2005 for approximately $1.8 billion (the “Apollo Transactions”).

All references to Cendant refer to Cendant Corporation, which changed its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc. in August 2006, and its consolidated subsidiaries, specifically in the context of its business and operations prior to, and in connection with, the Company’s separation from Cendant.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts and transactions of the Company. In presenting these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosures, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgments and available information at the time such estimate is made. As such, actual results could differ from those estimates. In management’s opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of interim results reported. The results of operations reported for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year or any subsequent interim period.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and following the guidance of Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements required to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As permitted under such rules, certain notes and other financial information normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted; however, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do include such notes and financial information sufficient so as to make the interim information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Company as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on March 1, 2012 (the “Form 10-K”).

Business Description—The Company provides comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions that enhance or extend the relationship of millions of consumers with many of the largest companies in the world. The Company partners with these companies to develop and market programs that provide services to their end-customers using its expertise in customer engagement, creative design and product development. The Company refers to the companies that it works with to provide customer engagement and loyalty solutions as its marketing partners. The Company refers to subscribers or members as those consumers to whom it provides services directly and has a contractual relationship. The Company refers to end-customers as those consumers that it services on behalf of a third party, such as one of its marketing partners, with whom it has a contractual relationship.

The Company has substantial expertise in deploying various forms of customer engagement communications, such as direct mail, inbound and outbound telephony and the Internet, and in bundling unique benefits to offer products and services to the customers of its marketing partners on a highly targeted basis.

The Company designs programs that provide a diversity of benefits, based on end-customers’ needs and interests, with a particular focus on programs offering lifestyle and protection benefits and programs which offer savings on purchases. For instance, the Company provides credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution, accidental death and dismemberment insurance (“AD&D”), discount travel services, loyalty points programs, various checking account and credit card enhancement services and other products and services.

• Affinion North America. Affinion North America is comprised of the Company’s Membership, Insurance and Package, and Loyalty customer engagement businesses in North America.

• Membership Products. The Company designs, implements and markets subscription programs that provide members with personal protection benefits and value-added services including credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution services, as well as access to a variety of discounts and shop-at-home conveniences in such areas as retail merchandise, travel, automotive and home improvement.

6

• Insurance and Package Products. The Company markets AD&D and other insurance programs and designs and provides checking account enhancement programs to financial institutions.

• Loyalty Products. The Company designs, implements and administers points-based loyalty programs for financial, travel, auto and other companies. The Company provides its clients with solutions that meet the most popular redemption options desired by their program points holders, including travel, gift cards, and merchandise. The Company also provides enhancement benefits to major financial institutions in connection with their credit and debit card programs. In addition, the Company provides and manages turnkey travel services that are sold on a private label basis to provide its clients’ customers with direct access to the Company’s proprietary travel platform.

• Affinion International. Affinion International is comprised of the Company’s Membership, Package and Loyalty customer engagement businesses outside North America. The Company expects to leverage its current international operational platform to expand its range of products and services, develop new marketing partner relationships in various industries and grow its geographical footprint.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance that gives an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The entity is also required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statements(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The guidance is to be applied retrospectively, for fiscal periods and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and early adoption is permitted. In December 2011, the FASB issued new guidance deferring the changes in the June 2011 relating to presentation of classification adjustments. The Company elected to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance, other than that related to presentation of reclassification adjustments, as of January 1, 2012 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

2. ACQUISITIONS

On January 14, 2011, the Company and Affinion Holdings entered into, and consummated, an Agreement and Plan of Merger that resulted in the acquisition of Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. (“Webloyalty”) by the Company. In accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Merger, on January 14, 2011, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of Webloyalty, and the interest of security holders of Webloyalty immediately prior to the Merger were converted into Affinion Holdings’ securities, as follows: (i) the shares of common stock of Webloyalty were converted into shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, (ii) options to purchase shares of Webloyalty’s common stock granted under Webloyalty’s equity plans, whether vested or unvested, were converted into options to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, (iii) warrants to purchase shares of Webloyalty’s common stock were converted into warrants to purchase Affinion Holdings’ common stock and (iv) awards of restricted shares of Webloyalty’s common stock (to the extent unvested) were converted into awards of restricted shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock. In connection with the acquisition, Affinion Holdings contributed to the Company (i) approximately 25.1 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock valued at $283.0 million, (ii) options to purchase approximately 1.2 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock valued at $6.2 million, of which $6.0 million was attributed to pre-acquisition service, and (iii) warrants to purchase approximately 0.5 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock valued at $1.7 million, all of which was attributed to pre-acquisition service, which the Company issued as consideration to acquire Webloyalty.

Webloyalty is a leading online marketing services company that provides, designs and administers online subscription loyalty solutions that offer valuable discounts, services and benefits for its subscribers and provides its clients with programs that enhance their relationships with their customers. The Company believes that the Company’s and Webloyalty’s product suites are highly complementary, allowing for a relatively seamless integration of benefits, as well as the opportunity to leverage the individual services and features to build a better, stronger offer for the consumer and thereby enhance the value proposition for the Company’s affinity marketing partners. Additionally, the significant scale of the Company’s marketing operations will benefit substantially through the integration of the innovative technologies Webloyalty has created in improving the design and targeting of offers. Also, Webloyalty has a strong presence in certain European markets where the Company seeks to expand its operations and accelerate its rate of growth.

7

In connection with the Webloyalty acquisition, Webloyalty and its domestic subsidiaries have become guarantors under the Company’s senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing the Company’s 7.875% senior notes and 11   ¹/₂% senior subordinated notes (see Note 5—Long-term Debt).

The Company has allocated the Webloyalty purchase price of $290.7 million among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in millions):

Cash	$	26.1
Accounts receivable		4.2
Other current assets		11.3
Property and equipment		5.2
Intangible assets		116.1
Goodwill		195.6
Other assets		0.2
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(56.5	)
Deferred income tax		(1.3	)
Income taxes payable		(0.7	)
Other current liabilities		(1.7	)
Non-current deferred income taxes		(6.7	)
Other long-term liabilities		(1.1	)
Consideration transferred	$	290.7

The intangible assets are comprised principally of member relationships ($90.0 million) and patents and technology ($17.0 million), which are being depreciated on an accelerated basis over weighted-average useful lives of seven and nine years, respectively. The goodwill, which is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, has been allocated to the Membership Products segment ($150.9 million) and the International Products segment ($44.7 million). As of June 30, 2011, the Company had incurred $3.9 million of acquisition costs, of which $0.2 million and $1.3 million was recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and included in general and administrative expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income. There were no such costs incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

On July 14, 2011, the Company and Affinion Holdings entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger to acquire Prospectiv Direct, Inc. (“Prospectiv”), an online performance marketer and operator of a daily deal website. On August 1, 2011, the merger was consummated and, as a result, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of Prospectiv for an initial cash purchase price of $31.8 million. If Prospectiv achieves certain performance targets over the 30 month period that commenced on July 1, 2011, the former equity holders will be entitled to additional consideration in the form of an earn-out of up to $45.0 million and certain members of Prospectiv’s management will be entitled to receive additional compensation related to their continued employment of up to $10.0 million. Such additional consideration and compensation will be settled in some combination of cash and shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock. As of the acquisition date, the liability for the additional consideration to be paid in connection with the earn-out was estimated to be $24.1 million, which was recorded at its fair value at the acquisition date of $14.4 million. As of the acquisition date, the purchase price, consisting of the cash paid at closing and the estimated fair value of the earn-out as of the acquisition date, was estimated at $46.2 million. The Company has allocated the purchase price of $46.2 million among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in millions):

Cash	$	2.4
Accounts receivable		3.0
Other current assets		0.5
Property and equipment		0.5
Intangible assets		12.3
Goodwill		31.5
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(4.0	)
Consideration transferred	$	46.2

The intangible assets are comprised principally of trademarks and tradenames ($6.3 million), proprietary databases and systems ($2.8 million) and patents and technology ($2.5 million), which are being depreciated on a straight-line basis over

8

weighted-average useful lives of ten, four and five years, respectively. The goodwill, which is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, has been allocated to the Membership Products segment. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no costs incurred by the Company related to the acquisition of Prospectiv.

In late March of 2012, Prospectiv implemented a reduction in force and revised its growth plans for 2012 and 2013. Based on these revised growth plans, the Company has concluded that it does not expect to pay any additional consideration in the form of an earn-out or additional compensation based on achievement of performance targets. Accordingly, during the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company reversed certain accruals for additional consideration recorded as part of the Prospectiv acquisition and additional compensation as the Company will not be able to achieve the growth originally planned for these years due to market conditions. The reduction of these accruals recorded during the first quarter of 2012 reduced general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 by $14.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

The Company concluded that the revisions made to the Prospectiv forecast as well as other marketplace events, represented an indication of potential impairment of Prospectiv’s goodwill and intangible assets. As a result, during the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company performed an interim impairment test of the goodwill for Prospectiv which is a separate reporting unit within the Membership Products reporting segment, as of April 1, 2012. Based on the impairment test, which used projected discounted cash flows to determine the fair value of Prospectiv and the implied fair value of the goodwill ascribed to Prospectiv, the Company recorded an impairment loss during the three months ended June 30, 2012 of $39.7 million, representing all of the goodwill ascribed to Prospectiv at the date of acquisition ($31.5 million) and a portion of the intangible assets of Prospectiv ($8.2 million). The impairment loss related to the goodwill and intangible assets of Prospectiv has been reflected as Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

3. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of:

	June 30, 2012
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
	(in millions)
Amortizable intangible assets:
Member relationships	$	934.6	$	(867.2	)	$	67.4
Affinity relationships		640.4		(477.7	)		162.7
Proprietary databases and systems		61.2		(56.2	)		5.0
Trademarks and tradenames		30.2		(12.6	)		17.6
Patents and technology		48.1		(33.5	)		14.6
Covenants not to compete		2.1		(1.4	)		0.7
	$	1,716.6	$	(1,448.6	)	$	268.0
	December 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
	(in millions)
Amortizable intangible assets:
Member relationships	$	934.7	$	(821.3	)	$	113.4
Affinity relationships		643.0		(457.1	)		185.9
Proprietary databases and systems		62.6		(55.8	)		6.8
Trademarks and tradenames		36.0		(11.8	)		24.2
Patents and technology		49.5		(29.5	)		20.0
Covenants not to compete		2.2		(1.3	)		0.9
	$	1,728.0	$	(1,376.8	)	$	351.2

Foreign currency translation resulted in a decrease in intangible assets and accumulated amortization of $3.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, from December 31, 2011 to June 30, 2012. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company revised the purchase price allocation related to its January 14, 2011 acquisition of Webloyalty, which included a revision of the fair value of

9

the acquired intangible assets from $84.6 million at March 31, 2011 to $116.1 million at June 30, 2011. As a result of the revisions to the portion of the Webloyalty purchase price allocated to intangible assets, amortization expense previously reported for the three months ended June 30, 2011 included $11.6 million of amortization expense attributable to the three months ended March 31, 2011. The accompanying unaudited statement of comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 reflects the previously reported amortization expense, adjusted to exclude the additional $11.6 million of amortization expense recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2011 attributable to the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
	(in millions)
Member relationships	$	22.3	$	32.2	$	45.9	$	65.6
Affinity relationships		11.2		12.4		22.4		24.1
Proprietary databases and systems		0.3		0.7		0.6		0.9
Trademarks and tradenames		0.6		0.6		1.3		1.1
Patents and technology		1.9		3.0		4.2		6.8
Covenants not to compete		0.1		0.1		0.2		0.2
	$	36.4	$	49.0	$	74.6	$	98.7

Based on the Company’s amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2012, the Company expects the related amortization expense for fiscal year 2012 and the four succeeding fiscal years to be approximately $132.0 million in 2012, $68.5 million in 2013, $57.4 million in 2014, $39.0 million in 2015 and $10.4 million in 2016.

At January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2012, the Company had gross goodwill of $643.0 million and $642.0 million, respectively, and accumulated impairment losses of $15.5 million and $47.0 million, respectively. The accumulated impairment losses represent the $15.5 million impairment loss recognized in 2006 impairing all of the goodwill assigned to the Loyalty Products segment related to the Apollo Transactions and the $31.5 million impairment loss recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2012 (as described below), impairing all of the goodwill assigned to the Membership Products segment related to the Prospectiv acquisition. The changes in the Company’s carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the six months ended June 30, 2012 are as follows:

	Balance at January 1, 2011		Acquisition			Currency Translation			Balance at December 31, 2011		Impairment			Currency Translation			Balance at June 30, 2012
Membership products	$	231.1	$	182.4		$	—		$	413.5	$	(31.5	)	$	—		$	382.0
Insurance and package products		58.3		—			—			58.3		—			—			58.3
Loyalty products		82.2		(0.5	)		—			81.7		—			—			81.7
International products		31.1		45.3			(2.4	)		74.0		—			(1.0	)		73.0
Total	$	402.7	$	227.2		$	(2.4	)	$	627.5	$	(31.5	)	$	(1.0	)	$	595.0

In late March of 2012, Prospectiv implemented a reduction in force and revised its growth plans for 2012 and 2013. The Company concluded that the revisions made to the Prospectiv forecast as well as other marketplace events, represented an indication of potential impairment of Prospectiv’s goodwill and intangible assets. As a result, during the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company performed an interim impairment test of the goodwill for Prospectiv, which is a separate reporting unit within the Membership Products reporting segment. Based on the interim impairment test, which used discounted cash flows to determine the fair value of Prospectiv and the implied fair value of the goodwill ascribed to Prospectiv the Company recorded an impairment loss during the three months ended June 30, 2012 of $31.5 million, representing all of the goodwill ascribed to Prospectiv at the date of acquisition. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company also performed an impairment test related to the intangible assets of Prospectiv and, based on the impairment test, recorded an impairment loss related to the Prospectiv intangible assets of $8.2 million, related to proprietary databases and systems ($1.0 million), trademarks and tradenames ($5.4 million) and patents and technology ($1.8 million). The impairment loss related to the goodwill and intangible assets of Prospectiv has been reflected as Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

10

4. CONTRACT RIGHTS AND LIST FEES, NET

Contract rights and list fees consisted of:

	June 30, 2012							December 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
	(in millions)
Contract rights	$	59.1	$	(57.9	)	$	1.2	$	58.7	$	(57.3	)	$	1.4
List fees		43.0		(21.2	)		21.8		39.6		(18.5	)		21.1
	$	102.1	$	(79.1	)	$	23.0	$	98.3	$	(75.8	)	$	22.5

Amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of which $1.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively, is included in marketing expense and $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $3.1 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of which $1.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively, is included in marketing expense and $1.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively, is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Based on the Company’s contract rights and list fees as of June 30, 2012, the Company expects the related amortization expense for fiscal year 2012 and the four succeeding fiscal years to be approximately $5.8 million in 2012, $5.5 million in 2013, $4.4 million in 2014, $3.5 million in 2015 and $2.4 million in 2016.

5. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(in millions)
Term loan due 2016	$	1,101.6		$	1,107.2
7.875% senior notes due 2018, net of unamortized discount of $2.8 and $3.1, respectively, with an effective interest rate of 8.00%		472.2			471.9
11  1/2% senior subordinated notes due 2015, net of unamortized discount of $1.8 and $2.0, respectively, with an effective interest rate of 11.75%		353.7			353.5
Capital lease obligations		1.5			1.8
Total debt		1,929.0			1,934.4
Less: current portion of long-term debt		(11.8	)		(11.9	)
Long-term debt	$	1,917.2		$	1,922.5

On April 9, 2010, the Company, as Borrower and Affinion Holdings, as guarantor, entered into a $1.0 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility with its lenders (“Affinion Credit Facility”). The Affinion Credit Facility initially consisted of a five-year $125.0 million revolving credit facility and an $875.0 million term loan facility. On December 13, 2010, the Company, as Borrower and Affinion Holdings, as a guarantor, entered into an agreement with two of its lenders which resulted in an increase in the revolving credit facility to $160.0 million, with a further increase to $165.0 million upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. These conditions were satisfied in January 2011. On February 11, 2011, the Company obtained incremental term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million under the Company’s amended and restated senior secured credit facility. The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility and a swingline loan subfacility. The term loan facility matures in October 2016. However the term loan facility will mature on the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity of the Senior Subordinated Notes (defined below) unless, prior to that date, (a) the maturity for the Senior Subordinated Notes is extended to a date that is at least 91 days after the maturity of the term loan facility or (b) the obligations under the Senior Subordinated Notes are (i) repaid in full or (ii) refinanced, replaced or defeased in full with new loans and/or debt securities with maturity dates occurring after the maturity date of the term loan facility. The term loan facility provides for quarterly amortization payments totaling 1% per annum, with the balance payable upon the final maturity date. The term loan facility also requires mandatory prepayments of the outstanding term loans based on excess cash flow (as defined), if any, and the proceeds from certain specified transactions. The interest rates with respect to term loans

11

and revolving loans under the Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at the Company’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 3.50%, or (b) the highest of (i) Bank of America, N.A.’s prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 2.50%. The effective interest rate on the term loan during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was 5% per annum. The Company’s obligations under the credit facility are, and the Company’s obligations under any interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements entered into with a lender or any of its affiliates will be, guaranteed by Affinion Holdings and by each of the Company’s existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. The credit facility is secured to the extent legally permissible by substantially all the assets of (i) Affinion Holdings, which consists of a pledge of all the Company’s capital stock and (ii) the Company and the subsidiary guarantors, including but not limited to: (a) a pledge of substantially all capital stock held by the Company or any subsidiary guarantor and (b) security interests in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the Company and each subsidiary guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. The credit facility also contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants in the Company’s credit facility include, among other things, limitations (all of which are subject to certain exceptions) on the Company’s (and in certain cases, Affinion Holdings’) ability to declare dividends and make other distributions, redeem or repurchase the Company’s capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain of the Company’s subordinated indebtedness; make loans or investments (including acquisitions); incur additional indebtedness (subject to certain exceptions); enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to pay dividends; merge or enter into acquisitions; sell assets; and enter into transactions with affiliates. The credit facility also requires the Company to comply with financial maintenance covenants with a maximum ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined) and a minimum ratio of EBITDA to cash interest expense.

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. Borrowings and repayments under the revolving credit facility were $30.0 million and $30.0 million, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Borrowings and repayments under the revolving credit facility were $50.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had $158.1 million available for borrowing under the Affinion Credit Facility after giving effect to the issuance of $6.9 million of letters of credit issued under the Affinion Credit Facility.

On November 19, 2010, the Company completed a private offering of $475.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018 (“2010 Senior Notes”). The 2010 Senior Notes bear interest at 7.875% per annum payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The 2010 Senior Notes will mature on December 15, 2018. The 2010 Senior Notes are redeemable at the Company’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2010 Senior Notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. The Company’s obligations under the 2010 Senior Notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each of the Company’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee the Company’s indebtedness under the Affinion Credit Facility. The 2010 Senior Notes and guarantees thereof are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank equally with all of the Company’s and the guarantors existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The 2010 Senior Notes are therefore effectively subordinated to the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured indebtedness, including the Company’s obligations under the Affinion Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The 2010 Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of each of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries that are not guarantors. On August 24, 2011, pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the 2010 Senior Notes, the Company completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the then-outstanding 2010 Senior Notes for a like principal amount of 2010 Senior Notes that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Company used substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering of the 2010 Senior Notes to finance the purchase of the previously outstanding senior notes issued in 2005, 2006 and 2009.

On April 26, 2006, the Company issued $355.5 million aggregate principal amount of 11 ¹/₂% senior subordinated notes due October 15, 2015 (the “Senior Subordinated Notes”). The Senior Subordinated Notes bear interest at 11 ¹/₂% per annum, payable semi-annually, on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The Senior Subordinated Notes mature on October 15, 2015. The Senior Subordinated Notes are guaranteed by the same subsidiaries of the Company that guarantee the Affinion Credit Facility and the 2010 Senior Notes as discussed in Note 12—Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Supplemental Financial Information. On September 13, 2006, the Company completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the then-outstanding 11 ¹/₂% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 for a like principal amount of 11 ¹/₂% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 that have been registered under the Securities Act.

The Affinion Credit Facility and the indentures governing the 2010 Senior Notes and the Senior Subordinated Notes each contain restrictive covenants related primarily to the Company’s ability to distribute dividends to its parent, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. The Company and its

12

subsidiaries may pay dividends of up to $35.0 million in the aggregate provided that no default or event of default has occurred or is continuing, or would result from the dividend. Payment of additional dividends requires the satisfaction of various conditions, including meeting defined leverage ratios and a defined fixed charge coverage ratio, and the total dividend paid cannot exceed a calculated amount of defined available free cash flow. The covenants in the Affinion Credit Facility also require compliance with a consolidated leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company paid cash dividends to its parent company, Affinion Holdings, of $37.0 million and $323.2 million, respectively.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants contained in the Affinion Credit Facility and the indentures governing the 2010 Senior Notes and the Senior Subordinated Notes.

On October 5, 2010, Affinion Holdings issued $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11.625% senior notes due November 15, 2015 (the “Affinion Holdings Senior Notes”). Any failure by Affinion Holdings to pay principal of, or interest on, the Affinion Holdings Senior Notes would constitute an event of default under the Affinion Credit Facility, giving the lenders under the Affinion Credit Facility the right to accelerate the repayment of all borrowings thereunder, which acceleration would also give rise to an event of default under the indentures governing the 2010 Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes. As a holding company with no significant assets other than the ownership of 100% of the Company’s common stock, Affinion Holdings will depend on the Company’s cash flows to make cash interest payments on the Affinion Holdings Senior Notes.

6. INCOME TAXES

The Company is included as a member of Affinion Holdings’ consolidated federal income tax return and as a member of certain of Affinion Holdings’ unitary or combined state income tax returns. Income taxes are presented in the Company’s consolidated financial statements using the asset and liability approach based on the separate return method for the consolidated group. Under this method, current and deferred tax expense or benefit for the period is determined for the Company and its subsidiaries as a separate group on a standalone basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary differences between the financial statements and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates. Deferred tax assets are recorded net of a valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as reductions to the income tax provision, while increases to the valuation allowance result in additional income tax provision. The realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on estimated future taxable income. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance for its U.S. federal net deferred tax assets. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company has also recorded valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign tax jurisdictions.

The Company’s effective income tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were (7.3)% and (11.9)%, respectively. The Company’s effective income tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were (0.7)% and (7.5)%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is primarily a result of the increase in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest from $27.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $58.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and an increase in the income tax provision from $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $4.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The difference in the effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is primarily a result of the decrease in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest from $62.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $58.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and an increase in the income tax provision from $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The Company’s tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income it earns in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and foreign income taxes and related foreign tax credits, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company recognized less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million of interest related to uncertain tax positions arising in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The interest has been included in income tax expense for the current period. The Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased by $0.8 million as a result of tax positions taken during the current period.

The Company’s income tax returns are periodically examined by various tax authorities. In connection with these and future examinations, certain tax authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service, may raise issues and impose additional assessments. The

13

Company regularly evaluates the likelihood of additional assessments resulting from these examinations and establishes liabilities, through the provision for income taxes, for potential amounts that may result therefrom. The recognition of uncertain tax benefits are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate or results of operations. Federal, state and local jurisdictions are subject to examination by the taxing authorities for all open years as prescribed by applicable statute. For significant foreign jurisdictions, tax years in Germany and the United Kingdom remain open. No income tax waivers have been executed that would extend the period subject to examination beyond the period prescribed by statute. The Company does not believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next 12 months. Any income tax liabilities or refunds relating to periods prior to October 17, 2005 are the responsibility of Cendant as discussed in Note 9—Related Party Transactions.

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings related to employment matters, contract disputes, business practices, trademark and copyright infringement claims and other commercial matters. The Company is also a party to lawsuits which were brought against it and its affiliates and which purport to be a class action in nature and allege that the Company violated certain federal or state consumer protection statutes (as described below). The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against such lawsuits.

On June 17, 2010, a class action complaint was filed against the Company and Trilegiant Corporation (“Trilegiant”) in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The complaint asserts various causes of action on behalf of a putative nationwide class and a California-only subclass in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs, including claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act, the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, the California Unfair Competition Law, the California False Advertising Law, and for unjust enrichment. On September 29, 2010, the Company filed a motion to compel arbitration of all of the claims asserted in this lawsuit. On February 24, 2011, the court denied the Company’s motion. On March 28, 2011, the Company and Trilegiant filed a notice of appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The Company does not know when the appeal will be decided. While that issue is on appeal, the matter has proceeded in the district court. There has been written discovery and depositions. Previously, the court had set a briefing schedule on class certification that called for the completion of class certification briefing on May 18, 2012. However, on March 28, 2012, the court suspended the briefing schedule on the motion due to the filing of two other overlapping class actions in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The first of those cases was filed on March 6, 2012, against the Company, Trilegiant, Chase Bank USA, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Capital One Financial Corp., Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Apollo Global Management, LLC, 1-800-Flowers.Com, Inc., United Online, Inc., Memory Lane, Inc., Classmates Int’l, Inc., FTD Group, Inc., Days Inn Worldwide, Inc., Wyndham Worldwide Corp., People Finderspro, Inc., Beckett Media LLC, Buy.com, Inc., Raukuten USA, Inc., IAC/InteractiveCorp., and Shoebuy.com, Inc. The second of those cases was filed on March 25, 2012, against the same defendants as well as Adaptive Marketing, LLC, Vertrue, Inc., Webloyalty.com, Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co. These two cases assert similar claims as the claims asserted in the earlier-filed lawsuit in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs. On April 26, the court consolidated these three cases. The court also set an initial status conference for May 17, 2012. At that status conference, the court ordered that Plaintiffs file a consolidated amended complaint that will combine the claims in the three previously separate lawsuits. The court also struck the class certification briefing schedule that had been set previously. The Plaintiffs have until August 17, 2012, to file the consolidated amended complaint, and the Defendants will have 60 days to respond to the complaint.

On November 10, 2010, a class action complaint was filed against the Company, Trilegiant, 1-800-Flowers.com, and Chase Bank USA, N.A. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The complaint asserts various causes of action on behalf of several putative nationwide classes that largely overlap with one another. The claims asserted are in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs, including claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, and New York’s General Business Law. On April 6, 2011, the Company and Trilegiant filed a motion to compel individual (non-class) arbitration of the plaintiff’s claims. The Company’s co-defendant, 1-800-Flowers.com, joined in the motion to compel arbitration, and co-defendant Chase Bank filed a motion to stay the case against it pending arbitration, or alternatively to dismiss. The Company does not know when the court will issue a ruling on these motions. On December 23, 2011, the plaintiff sought to dismiss the Company, Trilegiant, and 1-800-Flowers without prejudice. On January 4, 2012, the Company and Trilegiant objected to that dismissal (and 1-800-Flowers joined in that objection), seeking among other things dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiff responded to that objection on January 13, 2012, and we do not know when the court will enter a decision. Also, on January 13, 2012, the plaintiff sought to dismiss Chase without prejudice. On January 17, 2012, Chase filed an objection to the plaintiff’s dismissal request. That issue is currently being considered by the court. The Company does not know when the court will rule on that issue.

14

On July 13, 2011, a class action lawsuit was filed against Affinion Group, LLC (“AGLLC”), Trilegiant, Apollo Global Management LLC, and Chase Bank USA, N.A., in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The complaint asserted similar causes of action as are asserted in the Connecticut litigation on behalf of putative nationwide classes in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs. On October 18, 2011, Trilegiant, AGLLC, and Apollo filed a motion to stay, to which the plaintiff never responded. On November 1, 2011, Trilegiant and AGLLC filed a motion to compel arbitration, and Apollo joined in that motion and also sought dismissal. On December 15, 2011, the plaintiff sought to dismiss the action without prejudice, and on December 21, 2011, Trilegiant, Affinion, and Apollo filed a brief urging the court to dismiss the action with prejudice. On January 17, 2012, Chase filed a motion to transfer this case to the Eastern District of New York (“EDNY”). On or about February 29, 2012, the case was dismissed without prejudice. The same lead plaintiff’s law firm also filed a substantially similar class action lawsuit against the same defendants as well as Avis Rent A Car System, LLC, Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, Avis Budget Group, Inc., and Bank of America, N.A. in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Portland Division, on July 14, 2011. On December 27, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice, and the case was terminated by the court on January 6, 2012. On August 4, 2011, those same lawyers filed another substantially similar class action lawsuit against the same defendants sued in the Arizona lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. On December 23, 2011, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to Trilegiant, AGLLC, and Apollo. On February 10, 2012, the court entered an order dismissing the lawsuit in its entirety without prejudice. On August 8, 2011, those same lawyers filed a substantially similar class action lawsuit against AGLLC, Trilegiant Corporation, Apollo Global Management, LLC, and American Express Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On December 5, 2011, the court granted American Express’s motion to compel arbitration. On December 14, 2011, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to Trilegiant, AGLLC, and Apollo, and the case was closed by the court on the same day. Finally, on October 25, 2011, these same lawyers filed a substantially similar class action lawsuit against AGLLC, Trilegiant, Apollo Global Management, LLC, IAC/InterActiveCorp., Shoebuy.com, and Chase Bank USA, N.A. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On December 14, 2011, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to all of the defendants except Chase, and the case was terminated by the court on or about February 21, 2012. On October 6, 2011, the plaintiffs in the preceding class action cases (other than the class action cases that were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on March 6, 2012 and March 25, 2012, respectively) filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) seeking coordinated pretrial proceedings of those class action cases with the case that was filed on June 17, 2010 in the United States Court for the District of Connecticut. (The plaintiffs later sought to include within the proposed consolidated action the case they filed on October 25, 2011 (discussed above)). Plaintiffs in those actions argued that the factual allegations in the cases raised common issues that made pretrial transfer appropriate; they sought transfer and consolidation of the cases to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. All of the defendants opposed that motion. On December 9, 2011, the JPML entered an order denying consolidation and transfer of these cases.

On June 25, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed against Webloyalty and one of its clients in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California alleging, among other things, violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Electronic Communications Privacy Act, unjust enrichment, fraud, civil theft, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, California Consumers Legal Remedies Act violations, false advertising and California Consumer Business Practice violations. This lawsuit relates to Webloyalty’s alleged conduct occurring on and after October 1, 2008. On February 17, 2011, Webloyalty filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in this lawsuit. On April 12, 2011, the Court granted Webloyalty’s motion and dismissed all claims against the defendants. On May 10, 2011, plaintiff filed a notice appealing the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiff filed his opening appeals brief with the Ninth Circuit on October 17, 2011, and defendants filed their respective answering briefs on December 23, 2011. Plaintiff filed its reply brief on January 23, 2012. No date for oral argument on plaintiff’s appeal has been set.

On August 27, 2010, another substantially similar class action lawsuit was filed against Webloyalty, one of its former clients and one of the credit card associations in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging, among other things, violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, unjust enrichment, civil theft, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act violations. This lawsuit relates to Webloyalty’s alleged conduct occurring on and after October 1, 2008. On December 23, 2010, Webloyalty filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit, which had since been amended in its entirety. The court has not yet scheduled a hearing or ruled on Webloyalty’s motion.

On June 7, 2012, another class action lawsuit was filed U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California against Webloyalty factually similar to the foregoing California and Connecticut actions. The action claims that Webloyalty engaged in unlawful business practices in violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. and in violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade

15

Practices Act. Both claims are based on allegations that in connection with enrollment and billing of the plaintiff, Webloyalty charged plaintiff’s credit or debit card using information obtained through a data pass process and without obtaining directly from plaintiff his full account number, name, address, and contact information, as purportedly required under Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act. Webloyalty’s answer or other response to the complaint is due on July 27, 2012.

The Company and Trilegiant are also a party to lawsuits arising out of the inquiries made by the state attorneys general.

On October 14, 2010, the Company and Trilegiant filed a declaratory relief action against the State of South Carolina, in the Court of Common Pleas of South Carolina for the County of Richland, Fifth Judicial Circuit, seeking a declaratory judgment that their marketing practices comply with South Carolina law. The Company and Trilegiant also seek a declaratory judgment that the State may not appoint private counsel to bring an action against the Company and Trilegiant on the State’s behalf. The State has filed a motion to dismiss both requests for declaratory judgment. On December 17, 2010, the State of South Carolina appointed private counsel and filed a civil action against the Company and Trilegiant, in the Court of Common Pleas of South Carolina for the County of Spartanburg, Seventh Judicial Circuit, under the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act, seeking civil penalties, restitution and an injunction. On December 31, 2010, the State filed its First Amended Complaint naming the Company, Trilegiant, and certain current and former officers as defendants. Also on December 31, 2010, the State filed its Notice of Motion and Motion for a Temporary Injunction. The Company and Trilegiant are attempting to resolve the matter through settlement but no assurance is made that a settlement will be reached. The courts in both actions have yet to rule on any pending motion and have stayed litigation while the parties continue their good faith efforts to settle.

On November 24, 2010, the State of Iowa filed an action against the Company, Trilegiant, and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in the Iowa District Court for Polk County. This action was superseded by an action filed on March 11, 2011. The superseding action does not name the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and alleges violations of Iowa’s Buying Club Law, and seeks injunctive relief as well as monetary relief. Subsequently the case has been dismissed without prejudice on the state’s own motion. The Company is attempting to resolve the matter through settlement but no assurance is made that a settlement will be reached.

Other Contingencies

From time to time, the Company receives inquiries from federal and state agencies which may include the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, state attorneys general and other state regulatory agencies, including state insurance regulators. The Company responds to these matters and requests for documents, some of which may lead to further investigations and proceedings.

Between December 2008 and February 2011, the Company and Webloyalty received inquiries from numerous state attorneys general relating to the marketing of their membership programs and their compliance with consumer protection statutes. The Company and Webloyalty have responded to the states’ request for documents and information and are in active discussions with such states regarding their investigations and the resolution of these matters. Settlement of such matters may include payment by the Company and Webloyalty to the states, restitution to consumers and injunctive relief. Settlement of such matters may include payment by the Company and Webloyalty to the states, restitution to consumers and injunctive relief.

In that regard, in August 2010, the Company entered into a voluntary Assurance of Discontinuance with the New York Attorney General’s Office. Pursuant to that settlement, the Company agreed to cease in New York its online marketing practices relating to the acquisition of consumers’ credit or debit card account numbers automatically from its retailer or merchant marketing partners when a consumer enrolls in one of the Company’s programs after making a purchase through one of such partners’ web sites as previously agreed to with the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation on January 6, 2010. Additionally, the Company agreed, among other things, with the New York Attorney General’s Office to cease in New York “live check” marketing whereby a consumer enrolls in a program or service by endorsing and cashing a check. As part of such settlement, the Company paid $3.0 million in fees, costs, and penalties and approximately $1.8 million as restitution to New York consumers in addition to refund claims. As of September 13, 2010, Webloyalty also entered into a similar settlement agreement with the New York Attorney General’s Office. Pursuant to that settlement, Webloyalty agreed to pay $5.2 million in costs, fines and penalties, establish a restitution program for certain New York residents that joined a Webloyalty membership program between October 1, 2008 and January 13, 2010 and submitted a valid claim form, and implement changes to Webloyalty’s marketing of its membership programs. All costs, fines and penalties relating to the settlement were paid by Webloyalty in October 2010. Restitution to New York consumers in the amount of $2.6 million was paid in the second quarter of 2011.

16

From time to time Affinion International receives inquiries from the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom (the “FSA”) regarding its products. Resolution of an inquiry may include insignificant changes to its business practices, monetary fines and/or restitution.

The Company believes that the amount accrued for the above litigation and contingencies matters is adequate, and the reasonably possible loss beyond the amounts accrued will not have a material effect on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, based on information currently available. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the Company believes that accruals are adequate and it intends to vigorously defend itself against such matters, unfavorable resolution could occur, which could have a material effect on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole.

Surety Bonds and Letters of Credit

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is required to provide surety bonds to various state authorities in order to operate its membership, insurance and travel agency programs. As of June 30, 2012, the Company provided guarantees for surety bonds totaling approximately $11.9 million and issued letters of credit and performance bonds totaling $11.8 million.

8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

In connection with the closing of the Apollo Transactions on October 17, 2005, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan authorizes the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Affinion Holdings to grant non-qualified, non-assignable stock options and rights to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries. Options granted under the 2005 Plan have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock awards have a purchase price determined by the Board. The Board was authorized to grant up to 4.9 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock under the 2005 Plan over a ten year period. As discussed below, no additional grants may be made under Affinion Holdings’ 2005 Plan on or after November 7, 2007, the effective date of the 2007 Plan, as defined below.

In November 2007, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2007 Stock Award Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan authorizes the Board to grant awards of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, performance compensation awards (including cash bonus awards) or any combination of these awards to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, options granted under the 2007 Plan will have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock awards have a purchase price determined by the Board. The Board was authorized to grant up to 10.0 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock under the 2007 Plan over a ten year period. As of June 30, 2012, there were 4.9 million shares available under the 2007 Plan for future grants.

In connection with the acquisition of Webloyalty in January 2011, the Company assumed the webloyalty.com, inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “webloyalty.com ISO Plan”), the webloyalty.com, inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the “webloyalty.com NQ Plan”) and the Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. 2005 Equity Award Plan (the “Webloyalty 2005 Plan”). The webloyalty.com ISO Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in February 1999, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of incentive stock options to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. Unless otherwise determined by Webloyalty’s board of directors, options granted under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan over a ten year period. As of June 30, 2012, after conversion of the outstanding options under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan into options to acquire shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, there were options to acquire 0.1 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock at an exercise price of $0.98. All of the outstanding options were vested as of June 30, 2012 and expire in September 2012. No additional grants may be made under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan.

The webloyalty.com NQ Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in February 1999, as amended and restated in February 2004, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of stock options to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan over a ten year period. As of June 30, 2012, there were no outstanding options under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan. No additional grants may be made under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan.

The Webloyalty 2005 Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in May 2005, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,

17

restricted stock units, stock bonuses and performance compensation awards or any combination of these awards to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. Unless otherwise determined by Webloyalty’s board of directors, incentive stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and nonqualified stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the par value of a share of Webloyalty’s common stock on the date of grant. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan over a ten year period. As of June 30, 2012, after conversion of the outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan into options to acquire shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, there were options to acquire 0.6 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock at exercise prices ranging from $3.33 to $12.95. Substantially all of the outstanding options were vested as of June 30, 2012 and expire between May 2015 and September 2018.

For employee stock awards, the Company recognizes compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is the period during which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. The Company has elected to recognize compensation cost for awards with only a service condition and have a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Stock Options

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no stock options granted to employees from the 2005 Plan. All options previously granted were granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock options granted to employees from the 2005 Plan are comprised of three tranches with the following terms:

	Tranche A	Tranche B	Tranche C
Vesting	Ratably over 5 years*	100% after 8 years**	100% after 8 years**
Term of option	10 years	10 years	10 years

* In the event of a sale of the Company, vesting for tranche A occurs 18 months after the date of sale.

** Tranche B and C vesting would be accelerated upon specified realized returns to Apollo.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, 0.5 million stock options were granted to employees from the 2007 Plan. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, 2.5 million stock options were granted to employees from the 2007 Plan. The options granted to employees during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were granted with an exercise price of $8.16, equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The options granted to employees during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were granted with an exercise price of $9.16, equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

The stock options granted to employees from the 2007 Plan have the following terms:

Vesting period	Ratably over 4 years
Option term	10 years

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, there were no stock options granted to members of the Board of Directors. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, there were 0.1 million stock options granted to members of the Board of Directors from the 2007 Plan with an exercise price of $9.16, equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Generally, options granted to members of the Board of Directors fully vest on the date of grant and have an option term of 10 years.

The fair value of each option award from the 2007 Plan during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of comparable companies. The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding, and is based on the average of the requisite service period and the contractual term of the option.

	2012			2011
Expected volatility		50.0	%		44.0	%
Expected life (in years)		5.89-6.25			4.92-6.08
Risk-free interest rate		1.15	%		2.03-2.37	%
Dividend yield		—	%		—	%

18

A summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is presented below (number of options in thousands):

	2005 Plan – Grants to Employees- Tranche A			2005 Plan – Grants to Employees- Tranche B			2005 Plan – Grants to Employees- Tranche C			Grants to Board of Directors		2007 Plan – Grants to Employees
Outstanding options at January 1, 2012		1,558			767			767			423		3,850
Granted		—			—			—			—		495
Exercised		—			—			—			—		—
Forfeited or expired		(24	)		(72	)		(72	)		—		(562	)
Outstanding options at June 30, 2012		1,534			695			695			423		3,783
Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2012		1,534			695			695			423		3,783
Exercisable options at June 30, 2012		1,534			—			—			423		1,468
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)		3.5			3.5			3.5			5.0		8.3
Weighted average grant date fair value per option granted in 2012	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	3.97
Weighted average exercise price of exercisable options at June 30, 2012	$	1.58		$	—		$	—		$	5.29	$	12.03
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options at June 30, 2012	$	1.59		$	1.59		$	1.59		$	5.29	$	10.62

Based on the estimated fair values of options granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $1.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Based on the estimated fair values of options granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $1.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively. In addition, in connection with dividends paid by Affinion Holdings to its common stock holders during the three months ended March 31, 2011, Affinion Holdings made payments to holders of options to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock of $13.7 million, which has been recognized by the Company as compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, there was $9.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.2 years.

Restricted Stock Units

On January 13, 2010, the Board’s Compensation Committee approved the Amended and Restated 2010 Retention Award Program (the “2010 RAP”), which provides for awards of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the 2007 Stock Award Plan and granted approximately 942,000 RSUs to key employees. The RSUs awarded under the 2010 RAP have an aggregate cash election dollar value of approximately $9.9 million and are subject to time-based vesting conditions that run through approximately the first quarter of 2012. Generally, the number of RSUs awarded to each participant is equal to the quotient of (i) the aggregate cash election dollar value of RSUs that will be awarded to such participant (the “Dollar Award Value”) multiplied by 1.2, divided by (ii) $12.63 (i.e. the value per share of Affinion Holdings’ common stock as of December 31, 2009). Upon vesting of the RSUs, participants may settle the RSUs in shares of common stock or elect to receive cash in lieu of shares of common stock upon any of the four vesting dates for such RSUs in an amount equal to one-fourth of the Dollar Award Value. During 2010 and 2011, the Board issued additional grants totaling 159,000 RSUs to key employees under substantially the same terms. Due to the ability of the participants to settle their awards in cash, the Company accounts for these RSUs as a liability award.

On March 30, 2012, the Board’s Compensation Committee approved the 2012 Retention Award Program (the “2012 RAP”), which provides for awards of RSUs under the 2007 Stock Award Plan. During the three months ending June 30, 2012, the Company granted approximately 1.2 million RSUs to key employees. The RSUs awarded under the 2012 RAP have an aggregate cash election dollar value of approximately $9.7 million and are subject to time-based vesting conditions that run through approximately the first quarter of 2014. Generally, the number of RSUs awarded to each participant is equal to the quotient of (i) the Dollar Award Value, divided by (ii) $8.16, the value per share of Affinion Holdings’ common stock as of the grant date. Upon vesting of the RSUs, participants are able to settle the RSUs in shares of common stock or elect to receive cash in lieu of shares of common stock upon any of the three vesting dates for such RSUs. Due to the ability of the participants to settle their awards in cash, the Company accounts for these RSUs as a liability award.

19

A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is presented below (number of restricted stock units in thousands):

	Number of Restricted Stock Units			Weighted Average Grant  Date Fair Value
Outstanding restricted unvested awards at January 1, 2012		292		$	11.82
Granted		1,184			8.16
Vested		(187	)		12.40
Forfeited		(77	)		11.28
Outstanding restricted unvested awards at June 30, 2012		1,212		$	8.19
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)		1.2

Based on the estimated fair value of the restricted stock units granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively. Based on the estimated fair value of the restricted stock units granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $1.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively. In addition, in connection with dividends paid by Affinion Holdings to its common stock holders during the three months ended March 31, 2011, Affinion Holdings authorized payments to holders of unvested restricted stock units to be paid as the restricted stock units vest, resulting in the recognition of additional stock-based compensation expense of $2.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, there was $8.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the remaining vesting period of restricted stock units granted under the 2007 Plan. This cost will be recorded in future periods as stock-based compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 0.8 years.

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Post-Closing Relationships with Cendant

Cendant has agreed to indemnify the Company, Affinion Holdings and the Company’s affiliates (collectively the “indemnified parties”) for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made by Cendant, as well as for other specified matters, certain of which are described below. Affinion Holdings and the Company have agreed to indemnify Cendant for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made in the purchase agreement, as well as for certain other specified matters. Generally, all parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to breaches of representations and warranties (except with respect to the matters described below) (i) are subject to a $0.1 million occurrence threshold, (ii) are not effective until the aggregate amount of losses suffered by the indemnified party exceeds $15.0 million (and then only for the amount of losses exceeding $15.0 million) and (iii) are limited to $275.1 million of recovery. Generally, subject to certain exceptions of greater duration, the parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to representations and warranties survived until April 15, 2007 with indemnification obligations related to covenants surviving until the applicable covenant has been fully performed.

In connection with the purchase agreement, Cendant agreed to specific indemnification obligations with respect to the pending matters described below.

Excluded Litigation. Cendant has agreed to fully indemnify the indemnified parties with respect to any pending or future litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding relating to accounting irregularities in the former CUC International, Inc. announced on April 15, 1998.

Certain Litigation and Compliance with Law Matters. Cendant has agreed to indemnify the indemnified parties up to specified amounts for: (a) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to legal proceedings that (1) occur after the date of the purchase agreement, (2) relate to facts and circumstances related to the business of AGLLC or Affinion International Holdings Limited (“Affinion International”) and (3) constitute a breach or violation of its compliance with law representations and warranties and (b) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to compliance with laws to the extent related to the business of AGLLC or Affinion International.

Cendant, Affinion Holdings and the Company have agreed that losses up to $15.0 million incurred with respect to these matters will be borne solely by the Company and losses in excess of $15.0 million will be shared by the parties in accordance with agreed upon allocations. The Company has the right at all times to control litigation related to shared losses and Cendant has consultation rights with respect to such litigation.

20

Prior to 2009, Cendant (i) distributed the equity interests it previously held in its hospitality services business (“Wyndham”) and its real estate services business (“Realogy”) to Cendant stockholders and (ii) sold its travel services business (“Travelport”) to a third party. Cendant continues as a re-named publicly traded company which owns the vehicle rental business (“Avis Budget,” together with Wyndham and Realogy, the “Cendant Entities”). Subject to certain exceptions, Wyndham and Realogy have agreed to share Cendant’s contingent and other liabilities (including its indemnity obligations to the Company described above and other liabilities to the Company in connection with the Apollo Transactions) in specified percentages. If any Cendant Entity defaults in its payment, when due, of any such liabilities, the remaining Cendant Entities are required to pay an equal portion of the amounts in default. Wyndham held a portion of the preferred stock issued in connection with the Apollo Transactions until the preferred stock was redeemed in 2011 and a portion of the warrants issued in connection with the Apollo Transactions until the warrants expired in 2011, while Realogy was subsequently acquired by an affiliate of Apollo. Therefore, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, only Realogy remains a related party.

The Company entered into agreements pursuant to which the Company will continue to have cost-sharing arrangements with Cendant and/or its subsidiaries relating to office space and customer contact centers. These agreements have expiration dates and financial terms that are generally consistent with the terms of the related intercompany arrangements prior to the Apollo Transactions. There was no revenue earned for such services for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The Company incurred expenses of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, which is included in operating expenses in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income. There were no expenses incurred with a related party during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Certain marketing agreements permit the Company to continue to solicit customers of certain Cendant subsidiaries for the Company’s membership programs through various direct marketing methods. The marketing agreements generally provide for a minimum amount of marketing volume or a specified quantity of customer data to be allotted to the relevant party. The payment terms of the marketing agreements provide for either (1) a fee for each call transferred, (2) a bounty payment for each user that enrolls in one of the Company’s membership programs, or (3) a percentage of net membership revenues. These agreements generally expired in December 2010, subject to automatic one year renewal periods, and are generally terminable by the applicable Cendant party following December 31, 2007, upon six months written notice to the Company. In the event that a Cendant subsidiary terminated an agreement prior to December 31, 2010, the Cendant subsidiary was required to pay a termination fee based on the projected marketing revenues that would have been generated from such agreement had the marketing agreement been in place through December 31, 2010. During 2010, a supplemental agreement was entered into which had the effect of extending the remaining marketing agreements to December 31, 2012. The expense incurred for such services was $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, which is included in marketing and commissions in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income. There were no expenses incurred with a related party during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Under the loyalty and rewards program administration agreements, the Company continues to administer loyalty programs for certain Cendant subsidiaries. The agreements provided for the Company to earn fees for the following services: an initial fee to implement a new loyalty program, a program administration fee, a redemption fee related to redeemed rewards and a booking fee related to travel bookings by loyalty program members. The initial loyalty and reward program agreements expired on December 31, 2009. A termination notice has been received related to one of the programs and administration of that program ceased during 2010. The contract to administer the other program was renewed for a three year term. The total amounts included in net revenues in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income for such services was $0.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. There was no revenue recognized from a related party during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. In connection with these agreements, the Company formed Affinion Loyalty, LLC (“Loyalty”), a special-purpose, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Affinion Loyalty Group, Inc. (“ALG”). Pursuant to the loyalty agreements, ALG has provided a copy of the object code, source code and related documentation of certain of its intellectual property to Loyalty under a non-exclusive limited license. Loyalty entered into an escrow agreement relating to such intellectual property with Cendant and its affiliates in connection with the parties entering into the loyalty and reward agreements. Loyalty sub-licenses such intellectual property to Cendant on a non-exclusive basis but will only provide access to such intellectual property either directly or indirectly through the escrow agent in the event that ALG (1) becomes bankrupt or insolvent, (2) commits a material, uncured breach of a loyalty and reward agreement, or (3) transfers or assigns its intellectual property in such a way as to prevent it from performing its obligations under any agreement relating to Cendant’s loyalty and rewards programs. Upon access to the escrowed materials, Cendant will be able to use the escrowed materials for a limited term and for only those purposes for which ALG was using it to provide the services under the loyalty and reward agreements prior to the release of the escrowed materials to Cendant.

21

The Company earns referral fees from Wyndham for hotel stays and travel packages. The amount included in net revenues in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income for such services was $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. There was no revenue recognized from a related party during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Other Agreements

On October 17, 2005, Apollo entered into a consulting agreement with the Company for the provision of certain structuring and advisory services. The consulting agreement allows Apollo and its affiliates to provide certain advisory services for a period of twelve years or until Apollo owns less than 5% of the beneficial economic interests of the Company, whichever is earlier. The agreement could be terminated earlier by mutual consent. The Company was required to pay Apollo an annual fee of $2.0 million for these services commencing in 2006. On January 14, 2011, the Company and Apollo entered into an Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement (“Consulting Agreement”), pursuant to which Apollo and its affiliates will continue to provide Affinion with certain advisory services on substantially the same terms as the previous consulting agreement, except that the annual fee paid by Affinion increased to $2.6 million from $2.0 million, commencing January 1, 2012, with an additional one-time fee of $0.6 million which was paid in January 2011 in respect of calendar year 2011. The amounts expensed related to this consulting agreement were $0.6 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and $1.3 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income. If a transaction is consummated involving a change of control or an initial public offering, then, in lieu of the annual consulting fee and subject to certain qualifications, Apollo may elect to receive a lump sum payment equal to the present value of all consulting fees payable through the end of the term of the consulting agreement.

In addition, the Company will be required to pay Apollo a transaction fee if it engages in any merger, acquisition or similar transaction. The Company will also indemnify Apollo and its affiliates and their directors, officers and representatives for potential losses relating to the services to be provided under the consulting agreement.

In July 2006, Apollo acquired one of the Company’s vendors, SOURCECORP Incorporated, that provides document and information services to the Company. The fees incurred for these services were $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, which is included in cost of revenues in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company purchased $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of gift cards and during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company purchased $2.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of gift cards from AMC Entertainment, Inc., a company owned by an affiliate of Apollo. The cost of the gift cards, which were utilized primarily for loyalty program fulfillment, is included as a contra-revenue in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

On January 28, 2010, the Company acquired an ownership interest of approximately 5%, subsequently reduced to 2.9%, in Alclear Holdings, LLC (“Alclear”) for $1.0 million. A family member of one of the Company’s directors controls and partially funded Alclear and serves as its chief executive officer. The Company provides support services to Alclear and recognized revenue of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and recognized revenue of $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

On January 14, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of Webloyalty, Mr. Richard J. Fernandes received warrants to purchases shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock that may be exercised, in whole or in part, at any time between January 14, 2011 and May 12, 2012 by surrendering such warrants and delivering the aggregate exercise price (based on a current exercise price per share of $8.15, $9.73 or $11.44, depending on which warrants Mr. Fernandes exercises) to Affinion Holdings. The warrants expired on May 12, 2012 without being exercised.

On January 18, 2011, the Company declared and paid a dividend of approximately $123.4 million to Affinion Holdings. Affinion Holdings used cash on hand and the proceeds of the cash dividend to (i) redeem a portion of its outstanding preferred stock for approximately $41.2 million, (ii) pay a cash dividend to its stockholders (including holders of restricted stock units) of approximately $115.4 million, (iii) pay a one-time cash bonus to its option holders of approximately $9.6 million and (iv) pay additional amounts for transaction fees and expenses.

On February 11, 2011, the Company obtained incremental term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million under the Company’s amended and restated senior secured credit facility. The Company used the proceeds of the incremental term loans (a) for working capital and other corporate purposes, (b) to fund future strategic initiatives and (c) to pay a dividend to Affinion

22

Holdings of $199.8 million, to be used (i) to pay a dividend to Affinion Holdings’ shareholders (including holders of restricted stock units) and pay a one-time cash bonus to holders of certain options totaling $133.4 million, (ii) to fund the redemption of all of Affinion Holdings’ preferred stock for approximately $5.4 million, (iii) for general corporate purposes, (iv) for near-term interest payments of Affinion Holdings and (v) for certain other purposes.

On April 9, 2012, the Company declared, and on April 10, 2012, the Company paid a dividend of $37.0 million to Affinion Holdings, utilizing available cash on hand. Affinion Holdings expects to utilize the proceeds of the dividend to make future interest payments on its senior notes.

10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES

Interest Rate Swaps

In January 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap effective February 21, 2008. This swap converted a notional amount of the Company’s floating rate debt into a fixed rate obligation. The notional amount of the swap for the period from February 23, 2010 to February 22, 2011, the swap termination date, was $598.6 million.

In January 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap effective February 21, 2011. The swap has a notional amount of $500.0 million and terminates on October 17, 2012. Under the swap, the Company has agreed to pay a fixed rate of interest of 2.985%, payable on a quarterly basis with the first interest payment due on May 21, 2011, in exchange for receiving floating payments based on a three-month LIBOR on the notional amount for each applicable period.

All outstanding interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value. The changes in the fair value of the swaps, which are not designated as hedging instruments, are included in interest expense in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded interest expense, representing realized and unrealized gains and losses, of $0.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, related to the interest rate swaps. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded interest expense, representing realized and unrealized gains and losses, of $2.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively, related to the interest rate swaps.

As a matter of policy, the Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

The following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity for the Company’s long-term debt as of June 30, 2012 (dollars are in millions unless otherwise indicated):

	2012			2013			2014			2015			2016			2017 and Thereafter			Total		Fair Value At June 30, 2012
							(in millions)
Fixed rate debt	$	0.3		$	0.5		$	0.4		$	355.7		$	0.1		$	475.0		$	832.0	$	708.6
Average interest rate		9.43	%		9.43	%		9.43	%		9.43	%		7.88	%		7.88	%
Variable rate debt	$	5.6		$	11.3		$	11.2		$	11.3		$	1,062.2					$	1,101.6	$	1,005.2
Average interest rate(a)		5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%
Variable to fixed interest rate swap(b)																					$	5.1
Average pay rate		2.99	%
Average receive rate		0.46	%

(a) Average interest rate is based on rates in effect at June 30, 2012.

(b) The fair value of the interest rate swaps is included in accounts payables and accrued expenses at June 30, 2012. The fair value has been determined after consideration of interest rate yield curves and the creditworthiness of the parties to the interest rate swaps.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

In August 2010, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract under which the Company agreed to sell GBP 3.5 million and receive $5.5 million thirty days after the contract date. In September 2010, and in each subsequent month, upon settlement, the Company entered into a new thirty day forward contract. In April 2011, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract under which the Company agreed to sell GBP 4.3 million and receive $7.2 million thirty days after the contract date. In May 2011, and in each subsequent month, upon settlement, the Company entered into a new thirty day forward contract. In May

23

2012, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract under which the Company agreed to sell EUR 7.7 million and receive $9.5 million thirty days after the contract date. In June 2012, upon settlement, the Company entered into a new thirty day forward contract. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized a realized gain on the forward contracts of $0.1 million and a realized loss on the forward contracts of $0.1 million, respectively, and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized a realized gain on the forward contracts of $0.2 million and a realized loss on the forward contracts of less than $0.1 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had a $0.2 million unrealized loss on the foreign currency forward contracts.

Credit Risk and Exposure

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of receivables, profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers, prepaid commissions and interest rate swaps. The Company manages such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, approximately $59.9 million and $62.8 million, respectively, of the profit-sharing receivable was due from one insurance carrier. Receivables and profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers are from various marketing, insurance and business partners and the Company maintains an allowance for losses, based upon expected collectability. Commission advances are periodically evaluated as to recovery.

Fair Value

The Company determines the fair value of financial instruments as follows:

a. Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Receivables, Profit-Sharing Receivables from Insurance Carriers and Accounts Payable—Carrying amounts approximate fair value at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.

b. Long-Term Debt—The Company’s estimated fair value of its long-term fixed-rate debt at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is based upon available information for debt having similar terms and risks. The fair value of the publicly-traded debt is the published market price per unit multiplied by the number of units held or issued without consideration of transaction costs. The fair value of the non-publicly-traded debt, substantially all of which is variable-rate debt, is based on third party indicative valuations and estimates prepared by the Company after consideration of the creditworthiness of the counterparties.

c. Interest Rate Swap—At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s estimated fair value of its interest rate swap is based upon available market information. The fair value of the interest rate swap is based on significant other observable inputs, adjusted for contract restrictions and other terms specific to the interest rate swap. The Company primarily uses the income approach, which uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount. The fair value has been determined after consideration of interest rate yield curves and the creditworthiness of the parties to the interest rate swap. The counterparty to the interest rate swap is a major financial institution. The Company does not expect any losses from non-performance by the counterparty.

d. Foreign Currency Forward Contracts—At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s estimated fair value of its foreign currency forward contracts is based upon available market information. The fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts is based on significant other observable inputs, adjusted for contract restrictions and other terms specific to the foreign currency forward contracts. The fair value has been determined after consideration of foreign currency exchange rates and the creditworthiness of the parties to the foreign currency forward contracts. The counterparty to the foreign currency forward contracts is a major financial institution. The Company does not expect any losses from non-performance by the counterparty.

Current accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, giving the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. Level 1 inputs to a fair value measurement are quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

24

The fair values of certain financial instruments as of June 30, 2012, are shown in the table below:

	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2012
	Fair Value at June 30, 2012			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in millions)
Interest rate swap (included in accounts payable and accrued expenses)	$	(5.1	)		—	$	(5.1	)		—

The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to initial recognition:

	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2012
	Fair Value at June 30, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Impairment Losses Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	(in millions)
Goodwill		—		—		—		—	$	(31.5	)
Intangible assets	$	2.1		—		—	$	2.1	$	(8.2	)

The fair values of certain financial instruments as of December 31, 2011 are shown in the table below:

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011
	Fair Value at December 31, 2011			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in millions)
Interest rate swap (included in accounts payable and accrued expenses)	$	(10.4	)		—	$	(10.4	)		—

11. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Management evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable segments based upon several factors, of which the primary factors are revenue and “Segment EBITDA,” which the Company defines as income from operations before depreciation and amortization. The presentation of Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

The Segment EBITDA of the Company’s four reportable segments does not include general corporate expenses. General corporate expenses include costs and expenses that are of a general corporate nature or managed on a corporate basis, including primarily stock-based compensation expense and consulting fees paid to Apollo. General corporate expenses have been excluded from the presentation of the Segment EBITDA for the Company’s four reportable segments because they are not reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources among operating segments or assessing operating segment performance. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Net Revenues

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
	(in millions)
Affinion North America
Membership products	$	189.5		$	194.9		$	377.4		$	378.2
Insurance and package products		75.3			85.0			161.2			172.9
Loyalty products		37.4			34.7			75.8			67.5
Eliminations		(0.7	)		(0.8	)		(1.3	)		(1.7	)
Total North America		301.5			313.8			613.1			616.9
Affinion International
International products		76.1			73.3			146.3			137.1
	$	377.6		$	387.1		$	759.4		$	754.0

25

Segment EBITDA

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
	(in millions)
Affinion North America
Membership products	$	31.7		$	34.8		$	76.9		$	66.3
Insurance and package products		19.2			22.5			50.5			54.2
Loyalty products		12.2			10.9			24.6			21.1
Total North America		63.1			68.2			152.0			141.6
Affinion International
International products		10.0			9.8			11.2			13.7
Total products		73.1			78.0			163.2			155.3
Corporate		(5.7	)		(5.9	)		(8.9	)		(21.0	)
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		(39.7	)		—			(39.7	)		—
	$	27.7		$	72.1		$	114.6		$	134.3
	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
	(in millions)
Segment EBITDA	$	27.7		$	72.1		$	114.6		$	134.3
Depreciation and amortization		(49.0	)		(61.4	)		(99.1	)		(122.9	)
Income (loss) from operations	$	(21.3	)	$	10.7		$	15.5		$	11.4

12. GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following supplemental condensed consolidating financial information presents, in separate columns, the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the related condensed consolidating statements of comprehensive income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and the related condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 for (i) the Company (Affinion Group, Inc.) on a parent-only basis, with its investment in subsidiaries recorded under the equity method, (ii) the Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis, (iii) the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis and (iv) the Company on a consolidated basis. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several obligations of each of the guarantor subsidiaries, all of which are 100% owned by the Company. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Company to obtain funds from any of its guarantor subsidiaries by dividends or loan. The supplemental financial information has been presented in lieu of separate financial statements of the guarantors as such separate financial statements are not considered meaningful.

26

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF JUNE 30, 2012

(In millions)

	Affinion Group,  Inc			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20.1		$	4.2	$	24.2	$	—		$	48.5
Restricted cash		—			27.7		7.5		—			35.2
Receivables, net		2.1			109.7		36.7		—			148.5
Receivables from related parties		—			0.1		—		—			0.1
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		—			71.3		0.9		—			72.2
Prepaid commissions		—			42.9		4.4		—			47.3
Income taxes receivable		—			0.7		0.3		—			1.0
Intercompany interest receivable		0.3			—		—		(0.3	)		—
Other current assets		7.9			32.3		30.2		—			70.4
Total current assets		30.4			288.9		104.2		(0.3	)		423.2
Property and equipment, net		8.7			98.5		26.7		—			133.9
Contract rights and list fees, net		—			23.0		—		—			23.0
Goodwill		—			522.0		73.0		—			595.0
Other intangibles, net		—			220.9		47.1		—			268.0
Investment in subsidiaries		2,148.6			77.1		—		(2,225.7	)		—
Intercompany loan receivables		46.4			9.6		—		(56.0	)		—
Intercompany receivables		—			1,313.4		—		(1,313.4	)		—
Other non-current assets		32.4			25.3		7.2		—			64.9
Total assets	$	2,266.5		$	2,578.7	$	258.2	$	(3,595.4	)	$	1,508.0
Liabilities and Deficit
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	11.3		$	0.5	$	—	$	—		$	11.8
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		108.2			196.3		94.8		—			399.3
Payables to related parties		37.9			0.1		—		—			38.0
Intercompany interest payable		—			—		0.3		(0.3	)		—
Deferred revenue		—			107.3		22.6		—			129.9
Income taxes payable		0.6			0.2		2.5		—			3.3
Total current liabilities		158.0			304.4		120.2		(0.3	)		582.3
Long-term debt		1,916.2			1.0		—		—			1,917.2
Deferred income taxes		—			60.8		7.4		—			68.2
Deferred revenue		—			8.1		7.9		—			16.0
Intercompany loan payable		—			—		56.0		(56.0	)		—
Intercompany payables		1,307.1			—		6.3		(1,313.4	)		—
Other long-term liabilities		2.8			36.1		1.8		—			40.5
Total liabilities		3,383.9			410.4		199.6		(1,369.7	)		2,624.2
Affinion Group, Inc. deficit		(1,117.4	)		2,168.3		57.3		(2,225.7	)		(1,117.5	)
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary		—			—		1.3		—			1.3
Total deficit		(1,117.4	)		2,168.3		58.6		(2,188.7	)		(1,116.2	)
Total liabilities and deficit	$	2,266.5		$	2,578.7	$	258.2	$	(3,595.4	)	$	1,508.0

27

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011

(In millions)

	Affinion Group, Inc.			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	57.2		$	2.8	$	26.3	$	—		$	86.3
Restricted cash		—			22.6		7.8		—			30.4
Receivables, net		1.6			87.6		37.6		—			126.8
Receivables from related parties		—			0.6		0.2		—			0.8
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		—			73.3		0.7		—			74.0
Prepaid commissions		—			47.7		4.9		—			52.6
Income taxes receivable		—			0.7		1.4		—			2.1
Intercompany loans receivable		16.0			—		—		(16.0	)		—
Other current assets		4.7			33.7		29.7		—			68.1
Total current assets		79.5			269.0		108.6		(16.0	)		441.1
Property and equipment, net		9.1			102.0		23.6		—			134.7
Contract rights and list fees, net		—			22.5		—		—			22.5
Goodwill		—			553.5		74.0		—			627.5
Other intangibles, net		—			295.1		56.1		—			351.2
Investment in subsidiaries		2,127.0			77.1		—		(2,204.1	)		—
Intercompany loan receivable		31.4			—		—		(31.4	)		—
Intercompany receivables		—			1,222.2		—		(1,222.2	)		—
Other non-current assets		35.4			28.2		10.4		—			74.0
Total assets	$	2,282.4		$	2,569.6	$	272.7	$	(3,473.7	)	$	1,651.0
Liabilities and Deficit
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	11.2		$	0.7	$	—	$	—		$	11.9
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		99.0			213.9		85.2		—			398.1
Payables to related parties		34.7			0.4		0.2		—			35.3
Intercompany loans payable		—			—		16.0		(16.0	)		—
Deferred revenue		—			123.2		29.3		—			152.5
Income taxes payable		1.0			0.7		1.7		—			3.4
Total current liabilities		145.9			338.9		132.4		(16.0	)		601.2
Long-term debt		1,921.4			1.1		—		—			1,922.5
Deferred income taxes		—			54.8		12.7		—			67.5
Deferred revenue		—			9.6		8.2		—			17.8
Intercompany loan payable		—			—		31.4		(31.4	)		—
Intercompany payables		1,210.7			—		11.5		(1,222.2	)		—
Other long-term liabilities		17.1			34.7		1.9		—			53.7
Total liabilities		3,295.1			439.1		198.1		(1,269.6	)		2,662.7
Affinion Group, Inc. deficit		(1,012.7	)		2,130.5		73.6		(2,204.1	)		(1,012.7	)
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary		—			—		1.0		—			1.0
Total deficit		(1,012.7	)		2,130.5		74.6		(2,204.1	)		(1,011.7	)
Total liabilities and deficit	$	2,282.4		$	2,569.6	$	272.7	$	(3,473.7	)	$	1,651.0

28

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

(In millions)

	Affinion Group, Inc.			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
Net revenues	$	—		$	301.5		$	76.1		$	—	$	377.6
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		—			122.3			28.5			—		150.8
Operating costs		—			84.5			30.8			—		115.3
General and administrative		17.5			17.3			9.3			—		44.1
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		—			39.7			—			—		39.7
Depreciation and amortization		0.2			39.4			9.4			—		49.0
Total expenses		17.7			303.2			78.0			—		398.9
Loss from operations		(17.7	)		(1.7	)		(1.9	)		—		(21.3	)
Interest income		—			0.1			0.1			—		0.2
Interest expense		(36.3	)		(0.3	)		(0.3	)		—		(36.9	)
Interest income (expense)—intercompany		0.2			—			(0.2	)		—		—
Other income (expense), net		—			0.1			(0.5	)		—		(0.4	)
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(53.8	)		(1.8	)		(2.8	)		—		(58.4	)
Income tax expense		(0.5	)		(3.4	)		(0.4	)		—		(4.3	)
		(54.3	)		(5.2	)		(3.2	)		—		(62.7	)
Equity in income of subsidiaries		(8.6	)		—			—			8.6		—
Net loss		(62.9	)		(5.2	)		(3.2	)		8.6		(62.7	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		—			—			(0.2	)		—		(0.2	)
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(62.9	)	$	(5.2	)	$	(3.4	)	$	8.6	$	(62.9	)

29

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

(In millions)

	Affinion Group, Inc.			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	—		$	613.1		$	146.3		$	—		$	759.4
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		—			246.9			58.7			—			305.6
Operating costs		—			168.7			64.7			—			233.4
General and administrative		15.3			34.1			16.7			—			66.1
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		—			39.7			—			—			39.7
Depreciation and amortization		0.5			80.5			18.1			—			99.1
Total expenses		15.8			569.9			158.2			—			743.9
Income (loss) from operations		(15.8	)		43.2			(11.9	)		—			15.5
Interest income		—			0.4			0.1			—			0.5
Interest expense		(73.2	)		(0.7	)		(0.6	)		—			(74.5	)
Interest income (expense)—intercompany		0.5			—			(0.5	)		—			—
Other income (expense), net		—			0.2			(0.5	)		—			(0.3	)
Income (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(88.5	)		43.1			(13.4	)		—			(58.8	)
Income tax expense		(0.9	)		(5.3	)		(0.8	)		—			(7.0	)
		(89.4	)		37.8			(14.2	)		—			(65.8	)
Equity in income of subsidiaries		23.2			—			—			(23.2	)		—
Net income (loss)		(66.2	)		37.8			(14.2	)		(23.2	)		(65.8	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		—			—			(0.4	)		—			(0.4	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(66.2	)	$	37.8		$	(14.6	)	$	(23.2	)	$	(66.2	)

30

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

(In millions)

	Affinion Group, Inc.			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	—		$	313.8		$	73.3		$	—		$	387.1
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		—			133.9			26.0			—			159.9
Operating costs		—			77.3			31.9			—			109.2
General and administrative		9.2			27.2			8.2			—			44.6
Facility exit costs		—			1.3			—			—			1.3
Depreciation and amortization		0.3			49.2			11.9			—			61.4
Total expenses		9.5			288.9			78.0			—			376.4
Income (loss) from operations		(9.5	)		24.9			(4.7	)		—			10.7
Interest income		0.3			0.1			0.2			—			0.6
Interest expense		(38.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.6	)		—			(38.9	)
Interest income (expense)—intercompany		0.3			—			(0.3	)		—			—
Other expense, net		—			(0.1	)		—			—			(0.1	)
Income (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(47.0	)		24.7			(5.4	)		—			(27.7	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(0.7	)		(1.1	)		1.6			—			(0.2	)
		(47.7	)		23.6			(3.8	)		—			(27.9	)
Equity in income of subsidiaries		19.5			—			—			(19.5	)		—
Net income (loss)		(28.2	)		23.6			(3.8	)		(19.5	)		(27.9	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		—			—			(0.3	)		—			(0.3	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(28.2	)	$	23.6		$	(4.1	)	$	(19.5	)	$	(28.2	)

31

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

(In millions)

	Affinion Group, Inc.			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	—		$	616.9		$	137.1		$	—		$	754.0
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		—			254.5			49.3			—			303.8
Operating costs		—			155.6			61.6			—			217.2
General and administrative		30.1			49.9			17.4			—			97.4
Facility exit costs		—			1.3			—			—			1.3
Depreciation and amortization		0.6			102.7			19.6			—			122.9
Total expenses		30.7			564.0			147.9			—			742.6
Income (loss) from operations		(30.7	)		52.9			(10.8	)		—			11.4
Interest income		0.3			0.3			0.2			—			0.8
Interest expense		(73.4	)		(0.3	)		(1.0	)		—			(74.7	)
Interest income (expense)—intercompany		0.6			—			(0.6	)		—			—
Other expense, net		—			(0.1	)		—			—			(0.1	)
Income (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(103.2	)		52.8			(12.2	)		—			(62.6	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(1.3	)		(4.7	)		1.3			—			(4.7	)
		(104.5	)		48.1			(10.9	)		—			(67.3	)
Equity in income of subsidiaries		36.7			—			—			(36.7	)		—
Net income (loss)		(67.8	)		48.1			(10.9	)		(36.7	)		(67.3	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		—			—			(0.5	)		—			(0.5	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(67.8	)	$	48.1		$	(11.4	)	$	(36.7	)	$	(67.8	)

32

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

(In millions)

	Affinion Group, Inc.			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(66.2	)	$	37.8		$	(14.2	)	$	(23.2	)	$	(65.8	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		0.5			80.5			18.1			—			99.1
Amortization of debt discount and financing costs		4.2			—			—			—			4.2
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap		1.0			—			—			—			1.0
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		—			39.7			—			—			39.7
Adjustment to liability for additional consideration based on earn-out		(14.6	)		—			—			—			(14.6	)
Share-based compensation		6.2			—			—			—			6.2
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries		(23.2	)		—			—			23.2			—
Deferred income taxes		0.3			4.7			(3.0	)		—			2.0
Net change in assets and liabilities:											—
Restricted cash		—			(5.1	)		0.1			—			(5.0	)
Receivables		(0.5	)		(22.1	)		0.5			—			(22.1	)
Receivables from related parties		(0.1	)		0.5			0.3			—			0.7
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		—			2.0			(0.2	)		—			1.8
Prepaid commissions		—			4.9			0.5			—			5.4
Other current assets		(3.2	)		1.4			(0.8	)		—			(2.6	)
Contract rights and list fees		—			(0.7	)		—			—			(0.7	)
Other non-current assets		(1.0	)		4.1			0.7			—			3.8
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		8.6			(14.1	)		9.8			—			4.3
Payables to related parties		(2.5	)		(0.8	)		(0.2	)		—			(3.5	)
Deferred revenue		—			(17.2	)		(7.3	)		—			(24.5	)
Income taxes receivable and payable		(0.5	)		(0.5	)		2.0			—			1.0
Other long-term liabilities		0.2			1.3			—			—			1.5
Other, net		0.8			—			1.0			—			1.8
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(90.0	)		116.4			7.3			—			33.7
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(0.5	)		(14.3	)		(12.4	)		—			(27.2	)
Restricted cash		—			—			0.2			—			0.2
Acquisition-related payment, net of cash acquired		—			—			(1.2	)		—			(1.2	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(0.5	)		(14.3	)		(13.4	)		—			(28.2	)
Financing Activities
Principal payments on borrowings		(5.6	)		(0.3	)		—			—			(5.9	)
Return of capital to parent company		(37.0	)		—			—			—			(37.0	)
Intercompany loan		—			(9.6	)		9.6			—			—
Intercompany receivables and payables		96.0			(90.8	)		(5.2	)		—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		53.4			(100.7	)		4.4			—			(42.9	)
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			(0.4	)		—			(0.4	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(37.1	)		1.4			(2.1	)		—			(37.8	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		57.2			2.8			26.3			—			86.3
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	20.1		$	4.2		$	24.2		$	—		$	48.5

33

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

(In millions)

	Affinion Group, Inc.			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(67.8	)	$	48.1		$	(10.9	)	$	(36.7	)	$	(67.3	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		0.6			102.7			19.6			—			122.9
Amortization of debt discount and financing costs		4.1			—			—			—			4.1
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps		(0.7	)		—			—			—			(0.7	)
Facility exit costs		—			1.3			—			—			1.3
Share-based compensation		6.3			—			—			—			6.3
Equity in (income) loss of subsidiaries		(36.7	)		—			—			36.7			—
Deferred income taxes		0.4			4.3			(3.3	)		—			1.4
Payment received for assumption of loyalty points program liability		—			0.5			—			—			0.5
Net change in assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		0.2			(1.0	)		(0.5	)		—			(1.3	)
Receivables		0.6			(10.4	)		6.9			—			(2.9	)
Receivables from related parties		(0.6	)		0.1			0.6			—			0.1
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		—			(4.2	)		1.0			—			(3.2	)
Prepaid commissions		—			1.1			0.9			—			2.0
Other current assets		(2.8	)		2.7			7.1			—			7.0
Contract rights and list fees		—			(2.9	)		—			—			(2.9	)
Other non-current assets		0.2			4.8			0.7			—			5.7
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(10.9	)		(3.9	)		(21.1	)		—			(35.9	)
Payables to related parties		(3.7	)		(0.2	)		(0.5	)		—			(4.4	)
Deferred revenue		(0.1	)		(6.2	)		3.7			—			(2.6	)
Income taxes receivable and payable		(0.3	)		—			5.8			—			5.5
Other long-term liabilities		1.4			(2.9	)		(3.7	)		—			(5.2	)
Other, net		(2.3	)		0.4			(0.1	)		—			(2.0	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(112.2	)		134.4			6.2			—			28.4
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(2.0	)		(20.0	)		(2.9	)		—			(24.9	)
Restricted cash		—			—			1.1			—			1.1
Acquisition-related payment, net of cash acquired		—			—			(3.6	)		—			(3.6	)
Cash acquired in Webloyalty acquisition		—			10.4			15.7			—			26.1
Other investing activity		—			0.3			—			—			0.3
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(2.0	)		(9.3	)		10.3			—			(1.0	)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of term loan		250.0			—			—			—			250.0
Principal payments on borrowings		(5.7	)		(0.2	)		—			—			(5.9	)
Financing costs		(5.5	)		—			—			—			(5.5	)
Repurchase of employee equity award of a subsidiary		—			—			(3.5	)		—			(3.5	)
Return of capital to parent company		(323.2	)		—			—			—			(323.2	)
Intercompany loan		(3.6	)		—			3.6			—			—
Intercompany receivables and payables		126.2			(124.4	)		(1.8	)		—			—
Receivables from and payables to parent company		16.1			—			—			—			16.1
Distribution to non-controlling interest of a subsidiary		—			—			(1.1	)		—			(1.1	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		54.3			(124.6	)		(2.8	)		—			(73.1	)
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			1.4			—			1.4
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(59.9	)		0.5			15.1			—			(44.3	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		104.8			3.2			13.1			—			121.1
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	44.9		$	3.7		$	28.2		$	—		$	76.8

34

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form 10-Q”) is prepared by Affinion Group, Inc. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, in this Form 10-Q all references to “Affinion,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Affinion Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis; and all references to “Affinion Holdings” refer to Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., the parent company of Affinion Group, Inc.

The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-K”) and with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented in this Form 10-Q.

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Our disclosure and analysis in this Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Form 10-Q that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are largely based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events, which reflect estimates and assumptions made by our management. These estimates and assumptions reflect our best judgment based on currently known market conditions and other factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.

Although we believe our estimates and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are beyond our control. In addition, management’s assumptions about future events may prove to be inaccurate. Management cautions all readers that the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are not guarantees of future performance, and we cannot assure any reader that those statements will be realized or the forward-looking events and circumstances will occur. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements due to the factors listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K and this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section, or MD&A. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf.

Introduction

The MD&A is provided as a supplement to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere herein to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, results of our operations and changes in our financial condition. The MD&A is organized as follows:

• Overview. This section provides a general description of our business and operating segments, as well as recent developments that we believe are important in understanding our results of operations and financial condition and in anticipating future trends.

• Results of operations. This section provides an analysis of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. This analysis is presented on both a consolidated basis and on an operating segment basis.

• Financial condition, liquidity and capital resources. This section provides an analysis of our cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and our financial condition as of June 30, 2012, as well as a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources.

• Critical accounting policies. This section discusses certain significant accounting policies considered to be important to our financial condition and results of operations and which require significant judgment and estimates on the part of

35

management in their application. In addition, we refer you to our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, included in the Form 10-K for a summary of our significant accounting policies.

Overview

Description of Business

We are a global leader in the designing, marketing and servicing of comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions that enhance and extend the relationship of millions of consumers with many of the largest and most respected companies in the world. We partner with these leading companies to develop and market programs that provide valuable services to their end-customers using our expertise in customer engagement, product development, creative design and data-driven targeted marketing. These programs and services enable the companies we partner with to generate significant, high-margin incremental revenue, as well as strengthen and enhance the loyalty of their customer relationships, which can lead to increased acquisition of new customers, longer retention of existing customers, improved customer satisfaction rates, and greater use of other services provided by such companies. We refer to the leading companies that we work with to provide customer engagement and loyalty solutions as our marketing partners. We refer to subscribers or members as those consumers to whom we provide services directly and have a contractual relationship. We refer to end-customers as those consumers that we service on behalf of a third party, such as one of our marketing partners, with whom we have a contractual relationship.

We utilize our substantial expertise in a variety of direct engagement media, such as direct mail, inbound and outbound telephony, point-of-sale marketing, direct response radio and television and the Internet to market valuable products and services to the customers of our marketing partners on a highly targeted basis.

We design customer engagement and loyalty solutions with an attractive suite of benefits that we believe are likely to interest and engage consumers based on their needs and interests, with a particular focus on programs offering lifestyle and protection benefits and programs which offer considerable savings. For example, we provide credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution, accidental death and dismemberment insurance (“AD&D”), discount travel services, loyalty points programs, various checking account and credit card enhancement services, as well as other products and services.

We believe our portfolio of the products and services that are embedded in our engagement solutions is the broadest in the industry. Our scale, combined with the industry’s largest proprietary database, proven marketing techniques and strong marketing partner relationships developed over our nearly 40 year history, position us to deliver consistent results in a variety of market conditions.

As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately 71.9 million subscribers and end-customers enrolled in our membership, insurance and package programs worldwide and approximately 127 million customers who received credit or debit card enhancement services or loyalty points-based management services.

We organize our business into two operating units:

• Affinion North America. Affinion North America comprises our Membership, Insurance and Package, and Loyalty customer engagement businesses in North America.

• Membership Products. We design, implement and market subscription programs that provide members with personal protection benefits and value-added services including credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution services as well as access to a variety of discounts and shop-at-home conveniences in such areas as retail merchandise, travel, automotive and home improvement.

• Insurance and Package Products. We market AD&D and other insurance programs and design and provide checking account enhancement programs to financial institutions. These programs allow financial institutions to bundle valuable discounts, protection and other benefits with a standard checking account and offer these packages to customers for an additional monthly fee.

• Loyalty Products. We design, implement and administer points-based loyalty programs and, as of December 31, 2011, managed programs representing an aggregate estimated redemption value of approximately $4.7 billion for financial, travel, auto and other companies. We provide our clients with solutions that meet the most popular redemption options desired by their program points holders, including travel, gift cards and merchandise, and, in 2011, we facilitated over $2 billion in redemption volume. We also provide enhancement benefits to major financial institutions in connection with their credit and debit card programs. In addition, we provide and manage turnkey travel services that are sold on a private label basis to provide our clients’ customers with direct access to our proprietary travel platform.

36

• Affinion International. Affinion International comprises our Membership, Package and Loyalty customer engagement businesses outside North America. We expect to leverage our current international operational platform to expand our range of products and services, develop new marketing partner relationships in various industries and grow our geographical footprint.

We offer our products and services through both retail and wholesale arrangements, although on a wholesale basis, currently we primarily provide services and benefits derived from our credit card registration, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution products. In the majority of our retail arrangements, we incur marketing expenses to acquire new customers for our subscription-based membership, insurance and package enhancement products with the objective of building highly profitable and predictable recurring future revenue streams and cash flows. For our membership, insurance and package enhancement products, these marketing costs are expensed when the costs are incurred as the campaign is launched.

Our membership programs are offered under a variety of terms and conditions. Members are usually offered incentives (e.g. free credit reports or other premiums) and one to three month risk-free trial periods to encourage them to use the benefits of membership before they are billed. We do not recognize any revenue during the trial period and expense the cost of all incentives and program benefits and servicing costs as incurred.

Customers of our membership programs typically pay their membership fees either annually or monthly. Our membership products may have significant timing differences between the receipt of membership fees for annual members and revenue recognition. Historically, memberships were offered primarily under full money back terms whereby a member could receive a full refund upon cancellation at any time during the current membership term. These revenues were recognized upon completion of the membership term when they were no longer refundable. Depending on the length of the trial period, this revenue may not have been recognized for up to 16 months after the related marketing spend is incurred and expensed. Currently, annual memberships are primarily offered under pro-rata arrangements in which the member is entitled to a prorated refund for the unused portion of their membership term. This allows us to recognize revenue ratably over the annual membership term. During both the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011, in excess of 95% of our domestic new member and end-customer enrollments were in monthly payment programs. Revenue is recognized monthly under both annual pro rata and monthly memberships, allowing for a better matching of revenues and related servicing and benefit costs when compared to annual full money back memberships. Memberships generally remain under the billing terms in which they were originated.

We generally utilize the brand names and customer contacts of our marketing partners in our marketing campaigns. We usually compensate our marketing partners either through commissions based on revenues we receive from members (which we expense in proportion to the revenue we recognize) or up-front marketing payments, commonly referred to as “bounties” (which we expense when incurred). In addition, during 2009, as we saw subscriber pay-through rates in our North America Membership Products line begin to drop below historical averages, we began to enter into arrangements with certain marketing partners which we believe offer better utilization of our marketing spend. Under these arrangements, we pay our marketing partners advance commissions which provide the potential for recovery from the marketing partners if certain targets are not achieved. These payments are capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the acquired members. The commission rates that we pay to our marketing partners differ depending on the arrangement we have with the particular marketing partner and the type of media we utilize for a given marketing campaign.

We serve as an agent and third-party administrator for the marketing of AD&D and our other insurance products. Free trial periods and incentives are generally not offered with our insurance programs. Insurance program participants typically pay their insurance premiums either monthly or quarterly. Insurance revenues are recognized ratably over the insurance period and there are no significant differences between cash flows and related revenue recognition. We earn revenue in the form of commissions collected on behalf of the insurance carriers and participate in profit-sharing relationships with the carriers that underwrite the insurance policies that we market. Our estimated share of profits from these arrangements is reflected as profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers on the accompanying audited consolidated balance sheets and any changes in estimated profit sharing are periodically recorded as an adjustment to net revenue. Revenue from insurance programs is reported net of insurance costs in the accompanying audited consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

In our wholesale arrangements, we provide products and services as well as customer service and fulfillment related to such products and services supporting our marketing partners’ programs that they offer to their customers. Our marketing partners are typically responsible for customer acquisition, retention and collection and generally pay us one-time implementation fees and on-going monthly service fees based on the number of members enrolled in their programs. Implementation fees are recognized ratably over the contract period while monthly service fees are recognized in the month earned. Wholesale revenues also include revenues from transactional activities associated with our programs such as the sales of additional credit reports and discount shopping and travel purchases by members. The revenues from such transactional activities are recognized in the month earned.

37

We have made significant progress in increasing the flexibility of our business model by transitioning our operations from a highly fixed-cost structure to a more variable-cost structure by combining similar functions and processes, consolidating facilities and outsourcing a significant portion of our call center and other back-office processing. This added flexibility better enables us to redeploy our marketing expenditures globally across our operations to maximize returns.

Factors Affecting Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Competitive Environment

As a leader in the affinity direct marketing industry, we compete with many other organizations, including certain of our marketing partners, to obtain a share of the customers’ business. As affinity direct marketers, we derive our leads from customer contacts, which our competitors seek access to, and we must generate sufficient earnings per lead for our marketing partners to compete effectively for access to their customer contacts.

We compete with companies of varying size, financial strength and availability of resources. Our competitors include marketing solutions providers, financial institutions, insurance companies, consumer goods companies, internet companies and others, as well as direct marketers offering similar programs. Some of our competitors are larger than we are, with more resources, financial and otherwise.

We expect this competitive environment to continue in the foreseeable future.

Acquisitions

On January 14, 2011, the Company and Affinion Holdings entered into, and consummated, an Agreement and Plan of Merger that resulted in the acquisition of Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Webloyalty”) for $290.7 million. Webloyalty is a leading online marketing services company. Webloyalty provides, designs, and administers online subscription loyalty solutions that offer valuable discounts, services and benefits for its subscribers and provides its clients with programs that enhance their relationship with their customers. In addition to its domestic services, Webloyalty operates in several countries in Europe.

The Webloyalty acquisition is consistent with our long-standing business strategy in several respects: the acquisition enhances our operations in attractive international markets, including France and the U.K.; it provides us with a technology platform that expands the range of its marketing media, particularly in online channels; and it provides additional economies of scale in the management of our combined product portfolio.

On July 14, 2011, the Company and Affinion Holdings entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger to acquire Prospectiv Direct, Inc. (“Prospectiv”), an online performance marketer and operator of a daily deal website. On August 1, 2011, the merger was consummated and, as a result, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of Prospectiv for an initial cash purchase price of $31.8 million. If Prospectiv achieves certain performance targets over the 30 month period that commenced on July 1, 2011, the former equity holders will be entitled to additional consideration in the form of an earn-out of up to $45.0 million and certain members of Prospectiv’s management will be entitled to receive additional compensation related to their continued employment of up to $10.0 million. Such additional consideration and compensation will be settled in some combination of cash and shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock.

In late March of 2012, Prospectiv implemented a reduction in force and revised its growth plans for 2012 and 2013. Based on these revised growth plans, the Company has concluded that it does not expect to pay any additional consideration in the form of an earn-out or additional compensation based on achievement of performance targets. Accordingly, during the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company reversed certain accruals for additional consideration recorded as part of the Prospectiv acquisition and additional compensation as the Company will not be able to achieve the growth originally planned for these years due to market conditions. The reduction of these accruals during the three months ended March 31, 2012 reduced general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 by $14.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

The Company concluded that the revisions made to the Prospectiv forecast as well as other marketplace events, represented an indication of potential impairment of Prospectiv’s goodwill and intangible assets. As a result, during the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company performed an interim impairment test of the goodwill for Prospectiv, which is a separate reporting unit within the Membership Products reporting segment, as of April 1, 2012. Based on the interim impairment test, the Company recorded an impairment loss during the three months ended June 30, 2012 of $31.5 million, representing all of the goodwill ascribed to Prospectiv

38

at the date of acquisition. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company also performed an impairment test related to the intangible assets of Prospectiv as of April 1, 2012 and, based on the impairment test, recorded an impairment loss related to the Prospectiv intangible assets of $8.2 million.

Financial Industry Trends

Historically, financial institutions have represented a significant majority of our marketing partner base. In the past few years, a number of our existing financial institution marketing partners have been acquired by, or merged with, other financial institutions. Several relatively recent examples include Bank of America Corporation and Countrywide Financial Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Washington Mutual, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. and Wachovia Corporation. As we generally have relationships with either the acquirer, the target or, as in most cases, both the acquirer and the target, this industry consolidation has not, to date, had a material long-term impact on either our marketing opportunities or our margins, but has created delays in new program launches while the merging institutions focus on consolidating their internal operations.

In certain circumstances, our financial marketing partners have sought to source and market their own in-house programs, most notably programs that are analogous to our credit card registration, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution services. As we have sought to maintain our market share and to continue these programs with our marketing partners, in some circumstances, we have shifted from a retail marketing arrangement to a wholesale arrangement which has lower net revenue, but unlike our retail arrangement, has no related commission expense. Partially as a result of this trend, we have experienced a revenue reduction in our membership business.

Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) mandates the most wide-ranging overhaul of financial industry regulation in decades. Dodd-Frank was signed into law on July 21, 2010, and is in the process of being fully implemented. Dodd-Frank provides a regulatory framework and requires that regulators draft, review and approve, and implement numerous regulations and conduct studies that are likely to lead to more regulations. As part of this, Dodd-Frank created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) that became operational on July 21, 2011, and has been given authority to regulate all consumer financial products sold by banks and non-bank companies. These new and contemplated regulations could impose additional reporting, supervisory, and regulatory requirements on our financial institution marketing partners that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, even an inadvertent failure of our financial institution marketing partners to comply with these laws and regulations, as well as rapidly evolving social expectations of corporate fairness could adversely affect our business or our reputation. If our marketing partners become involved in legal proceedings or governmental inquiries relating to our products or marketing practices this could result in our marketing partners terminating their contracts with us, their inability to facilitate payment processing or their ceasing or changing marketing services and we may be subject to indemnification obligations under our marketing agreements, all of which could have a material impact on our business. Partially as a result of this uncertain regulatory environment, we have experienced slower growth in our domestic membership customer base and domestic membership revenues, and we anticipate that this trend may continue in the near future.

Internationally, our package products have been primarily offered by some of the largest financial institutions in Europe. As these banks attempt to increase their own net revenues and margins, we have experienced significant price reductions when our agreements come up for renewal from what we had previously been able to charge these institutions for our programs. We expect this pricing pressure on our international package offerings to continue in the future.

Regulatory Environment

We are subject to federal and state regulation as well as regulation by foreign authorities in other jurisdictions. Certain laws and regulations that govern our operations include: federal, state and foreign marketing and consumer protection laws and regulations; federal, state and foreign privacy and data protection laws and regulations; and federal, state and foreign insurance and insurance mediation laws and regulations. Federal regulations are primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission and the CFPB. State regulations are primarily enforced by individual state attorneys general. Foreign regulations are enforced by a number of regulatory bodies in the relevant jurisdictions.

These regulations primarily impact the means we use to market our programs, which can reduce the acceptance rates of our solicitation efforts, and impact our ability to obtain information from our members and end-customers. For our insurance products, these regulations limit our ability to implement pricing changes. In addition, new and contemplated regulations enacted by the CFPB could impose additional reporting, supervisory and regulatory requirements on, as well as result in inquiries of, us and our marketing partners that could delay marketing campaigns with certain marketing partners, impact the services and products we provide to consumers, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

39

We incur significant costs to ensure compliance with these regulations; however, we are party to lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, and state attorney general investigations involving our business practices which also increase our costs of doing business. See Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements.”

Seasonality

Historically, seasonality has not had a significant impact on our business. Our revenues are more affected by the timing of marketing programs which can change from year to year depending on the opportunities available and pursued.

Results of Operations

Supplemental Data

We manage our business using a portfolio approach, meaning that we allocate and reallocate our marketing investments in the ongoing pursuit of the highest and best available returns, allocating our resources to whichever products, geographies and programs offer the best opportunities. With the globalization of our clients, the continued evolution of our programs and services and the ongoing refinement and execution of our marketing allocation strategy, we have developed the following table that we believe captures the way we look at the businesses (subscriber and insured amounts in thousands except per average subscriber and insured amounts).

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Global Average Subscribers, excluding Basic Insureds		43,689		48,619		44,708		48,193
Annualized Net Revenue Per Global Average Subscriber, excluding Basic Insureds(1)	$	30.76	$	28.40	$	30.30	$	28.48
Global Membership Subscribers
Average Global Retail Subscribers(2)		10,702		11,377		10,910		11,407
Annualized Net Revenue Per Global Average Subscriber(1)	$	80.85	$	79.32	$	79.83	$	79.52
Global Package Subscribers and Wholesale
Average Global Package Subscribers and Wholesale(2)		28,813		32,924		29,600		32,455
Annualized Net Revenue per Global Average Package Subscriber(1)	$	8.52	$	6.43	$	7.74	$	6.40
Global Insureds
Average Supplemental Insureds(2)		4,174		4,318		4,198		4,331
Annualized Net Revenue Per Supplemental Insured(1)	$	55.83	$	61.76	$	60.59	$	59.48
Global Average Subscribers, including Basic Insureds		65,739		71,047		66,907		70,574

(1) Annualized Net Revenue Per Global Average Subscriber and Annualized Net Revenue Per Supplemental Insured are each calculated by taking the revenues as reported for the period and dividing it by the average subscribers or insureds, as applicable, for the period. Quarterly periods are then multiplied by four to annualize this amount for comparative purposes. Upon cancellation of a subscriber or an insured, as applicable, the subscriber’s or insured’s, as applicable, revenues are no longer recognized in the calculation.

(2) Average Global Subscribers and Average Supplemental Insureds for the period are each calculated by determining the average subscribers or insureds, as applicable, for each month (adding the number of subscribers or insureds, as applicable, at the beginning of the month with the number of subscribers or insureds, as applicable, at the end of the month and dividing that total by two) for each of the months in the period and then averaging that result for the period. A subscriber’s or insured’s, as applicable, account is added or removed in the period in which the subscriber or insured, as applicable, has joined or cancelled.

Wholesale members include end-customers where we typically receive a monthly service fee to support programs offered by our marketing partners. Certain programs historically offered as retail arrangements have switched to wholesale arrangements with lower annualized price points and no commission expense.

40

Basic insureds typically receive $1,000 of AD&D coverage at no cost to the consumer since the marketing partner pays the cost of this coverage. Supplemental insureds are customers who have elected to pay premiums for higher levels of coverage.

Segment EBITDA

Segment EBITDA consists of income from operations before depreciation and amortization. Segment EBITDA is the measure management uses to evaluate segment performance, and we present Segment EBITDA to enhance your understanding of our operating performance. We use Segment EBITDA as one criterion for evaluating our performance relative to that of our peers. We believe that Segment EBITDA is an operating performance measure, and not a liquidity measure, that provides investors and analysts with a measure of operating results unaffected by differences in capital structures, capital investment cycles and ages of related assets among otherwise comparable companies. However, Segment EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), and Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. You should not consider Segment EBITDA as an alternative to operating or net income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, or as an indicator of cash flows, or as a measure of liquidity.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012			Three Months Ended June 30, 2011			Increase (Decrease)
Net revenues	$	377.6		$	387.1		$	(9.5	)
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		150.8			159.9			(9.1	)
Operating costs		115.3			109.2			6.1
General and administrative		44.1			44.6			(0.5	)
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		39.7			—			39.7
Facility exit costs		—			1.3			(1.3	)
Depreciation and amortization		49.0			61.4			(12.4	)
Total expenses		398.9			376.4			22.5
Income from operations		(21.3	)		10.7			(32.0	)
Interest income		0.2			0.6			(0.4	)
Interest expense		(36.9	)		(38.9	)		2.0
Other income, net		(0.4	)		(0.1	)		(0.3	)
Income (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(58.4	)		(27.7	)		(30.7	)
Income tax expense		(4.3	)		(0.2	)		(4.1	)
Net loss		(62.7	)		(27.9	)		(34.8	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		0.1
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(62.9	)	$	(28.2	)	$	(34.7	)

Summary of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

The following is a summary of changes affecting our operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Net revenues decreased $9.5 million, or 2.5%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the same period of the prior year. Net revenues in our North American units decreased $12.3 million primarily as a result of a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience in our Insurance and Package business and lower retail revenues in our Membership business which was partially offset by growth from existing clients in our Loyalty business. International segment net revenues increased by $2.8 million, primarily from higher retail revenue, partially offset by lower package revenues and an unfavorable currency impact from the stronger U.S. dollar.

41

Segment EBITDA decreased $44.4 million primarily due to an impairment charge of $39.7 million of goodwill and certain other intangible assets that were acquired in the August 1, 2011 acquisition of Prospectiv. Excluding this charge Segment EBITDA decreased $4.7 million as the impact of the lower net revenues, along with higher operating costs, more than offset the impact of lower marketing and commissions.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

The following section provides an overview of our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Net Revenues. During the three months ended June 30, 2012 we reported net revenues of $377.6 million, a decrease of $9.5 million, or 2.5%, as compared to net revenues of $387.1 million in the comparable period of 2011. Net revenues of our Membership Products decreased $5.4 million from lower retail member volumes, primarily from the continued, but anticipated, attrition of the domestic member base of Webloyalty, which more than offset higher average revenue per average retail member and higher revenues from the Prospectiv acquisition. Insurance and Package revenues decreased $9.7 million primarily due to a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience. Loyalty Products net revenues increased $2.7 million which was primarily attributable to increased revenues from existing client programs. International Products net revenues increased $2.8 million primarily from higher retail revenue in our online channel partially offset by lower package revenue and an unfavorable currency impact of $5.0 million as a result of the stronger U.S. dollar.

Marketing and Commissions Expense. Marketing and commissions expense decreased by $9.1 million, or 5.7%, to $150.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $159.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Marketing and commissions expense decreased primarily due to the decreases in our Membership and Insurance and Package businesses partially offset by increases in our International business. The decrease in Membership was primarily the result of the delay in launches of certain marketing campaigns while the increase in International was primarily due to increased spending in our retail channel.

Operating Costs. Operating costs increased by $6.1 million, or 5.6%, to $115.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $109.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Operating costs were higher primarily due to higher fulfillment costs in our Membership and Loyalty businesses.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets. An impairment charge for goodwill and certain intangible assets in the amount of $39.7 million related to our 2011 Prospectiv acquisition was recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2012, primarily the result of lower projected future cash flows and other negative marketplace events in the daily deals business. The impairment charge includes $31.5 million related to all of the goodwill for Prospectiv and $8.2 million related to certain intangible assets ascribed in the August 1, 2011 acquisition, primarily tradenames and technology.

Facility Exit Costs. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded facility exit costs in the amount of $1.3 million associated with the lease on a Webloyalty facility. These costs represent the present value of future lease payments and other expenses related to the facility through the expiration of the lease, net of any estimated sublease income.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $12.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $49.0 million from $61.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily from recording $8.6 million less amortization expense in 2012 as compared to 2011 related to intangible assets acquired in the Webloyalty acquisition, principally member relationships, and lower amortization of $2.8 million on the intangible assets acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the Cendant Marketing Services Division (the “Apollo Transactions”) as the majority of those intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis. This amortization expense is based upon an allocation of values to intangible assets and is being amortized over lives ranging from 3 years to 15 years.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $2.0 million, or 5.1%, to $36.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $38.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to a $1.7 million more favorable impact of interest rate swaps in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased by $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to an increase in the current state and foreign tax liabilities and deferred federal and foreign tax liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2012, partially offset by a decrease in deferred state tax liabilities for the same period.

42

Our effective income tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were (7.3)% and (0.7)%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is primarily a result of the increase in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest from $27.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $58.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and an increase in income tax expense from $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $4.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Our tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income we earn in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and foreign income taxes and related foreign tax credits, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

Operating Segment Results

Net revenues and Segment EBITDA by operating segment are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Net Revenues									Segment EBITDA(1)
	2012			2011			Increase (Decrease)			2012			2011			Increase (Decrease)
	(in millions)
Affinion North America
Membership Products	$	189.5		$	194.9		$	(5.4	)	$	31.7		$	34.8		$	(3.1	)
Insurance and Package Products		75.3			85.0			(9.7	)		19.2			22.5			(3.3	)
Loyalty Products		37.4			34.7			2.7			12.2			10.9			1.3
Eliminations		(0.7	)		(0.8	)		0.1			—			—			—
Total North America		301.5			313.8			(12.3	)		63.1			68.2			(5.1	)
Affinion International
International Products		76.1			73.3			2.8			10.0			9.8			0.2
Total products		377.6			387.1			(9.5	)		73.1			78.0			(4.9	)
Corporate		—			—			—			(5.7	)		(5.9	)		0.2
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		—			—			—			(39.7	)		—			(39.7	)
Total	$	377.6		$	387.1		$	(9.5	)		27.7			72.1			(44.4	)
Depreciation and amortization											(49.0	)		(61.4	)		12.4
Income (loss) from operations										$	(21.3	)	$	10.7		$	(32.0	)

(1) See Segment EBITDA above and Note 11 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of Segment EBITDA and a reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to income from operations.

Affinion North America

Membership Products. Membership Products net revenues decreased by $5.4 million, or 2.8%, to $189.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $194.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Net revenues decreased primarily from lower retail member volumes, primarily from the continued, but anticipated, attrition of the domestic member base of Webloyalty, which more than offset higher average revenue per average retail member and higher revenues from the Prospectiv acquisition.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. Segment EBITDA decreased primarily due to the lower net revenues of $5.4 million and higher operating costs of $6.0 million, principally due to increased costs associated with higher membership and one-time conversion costs for our identity theft protection programs. These factors more than offset lower marketing and commissions of $7.4 million, primarily from the timing of launches for certain marketing campaigns, and lower facility exit costs of $1.3 million.

43

Insurance and Package Products. Insurance and Package Products net revenues decreased by $9.7 million, or 11.4%, to $75.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $85.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Insurance revenue decreased approximately $8.7 million primarily from a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience. Package revenue decreased approximately $0.9 million primarily from lower fee-based revenue from our NetGain product.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the lower net revenues which were partially offset by lower marketing and commissions and lower general and administrative costs.

Loyalty Products. Revenues from Loyalty Products increased by $2.7 million, or 7.8%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $37.4 million as compared to $34.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to growth from existing clients.

Segment EBITDA increased by $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, as the higher net revenue was partially offset by higher product and servicing costs.

Affinion International

International Products. International Products net revenues increased by $2.8 million, or 3.8%, to $76.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $73.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Net revenues increased primarily from higher retail revenues in our online channel and were partially offset by lower package revenue and an unfavorable impact of $5.0 million as a result of the stronger U.S. dollar.

Segment EBITDA increased by $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011 as the positive impact of the higher revenue was primarily offset by higher marketing and commissions from increased spending in our retail channel.

Corporate

Corporate costs decreased by $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011 as lower costs associated with stock compensation plans of $2.4 million were primarily offset by a $2.2 million negative impact from foreign exchange on intercompany borrowings in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

An impairment charge for goodwill and certain intangible assets in the amount of $39.7 million related to our 2011 Prospectiv acquisition was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2012, primarily the result of lower projected future cash flows and other negative marketplace events in the daily deals business. The impairment charge includes $31.5 million related to all of the goodwill for Prospectiv and $8.2 million related to certain intangible assets ascribed in the August 1, 2011 acquisition, primarily tradenames and technology.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012		Six Months Ended June 30, 2011		Increase (Decrease)
Net revenues	$	759.4	$	754.0	$	5.4
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		305.6		303.8		1.8
Operating costs		233.4		217.2		16.2
General and administrative		66.1		97.4		(31.3	)
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		39.7		—		39.7
Facility exit costs		—		1.3		(1.3	)

44

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012			Six Months Ended June 30, 2011			Increase (Decrease)
Depreciation and amortization		99.1			122.9			(23.8	)
Total expenses		743.9			742.6			1.3
Income from operations		15.5			11.4			4.1
Interest income		0.5			0.8			(0.3	)
Interest expense		(74.5	)		(74.7	)		0.2
Other income, net		(0.3	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)
Income (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(58.8	)		(62.6	)		3.8
Income tax expense		(7.0	)		(4.7	)		(2.3	)
Net loss		(65.8	)		(67.3	)		1.5
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.4	)		(0.5	)		0.1
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(66.2	)	$	(67.8	)	$	1.6

Summary of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

The following is a summary of changes affecting our operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Net revenues increased $5.4 million, or 0.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the same period of the prior year. Net revenues in our North American units decreased $3.8 million, primarily as a result of the absence in 2012 of a one-time payment from an insurance provider in our Insurance and Package business and lower retail revenues in our Membership business which more than offset higher net revenues from the acquisition of Prospectiv, and growth from existing clients in our Loyalty business. International segment net revenues increased by $9.2 million, primarily from higher retail revenue partially offset by lower package revenue and an unfavorable currency impact from the stronger U.S. dollar.

Segment EBITDA decreased $19.7 million, primarily due to an impairment charge of $39.7 million of goodwill and certain other intangible assets that were acquired in the August 1, 2011 acquisition of Prospectiv. Excluding this charge, Segment EBITDA increased $20.0 million as the positive impact of the higher revenues along with lower general and administrative costs, more than offset higher operating costs. The lower general and administrative costs were primarily due to the absence in 2012 of a special cash distribution of $14.8 million to option holders in connection with dividends paid by Affinion Holdings to stockholders in January 2011 and February 2011, and the reversal of a $14.6 million liability in connection with previously anticipated earn-out payments originally recorded in 2011 for the Prospectiv acquisition.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

The following section provides an overview of our consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Net Revenues. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 we reported net revenues of $759.4 million, an increase of $5.4 million, or 0.7%, as compared to net revenues of $754.0 million in the comparable period in 2011. Net revenues of our Membership Products decreased $0.8 million as lower revenues from lower retail member volumes, primarily from the continued, but anticipated, attrition of the domestic member base of Webloyalty, which more than offset higher revenues from the Prospectiv acquisition and higher volumes in wholesale arrangements. Insurance and Package net revenues decreased $11.7 million primarily due to the absence in 2012 of a one-time payment from an insurance provider along with lower package revenue. Loyalty Products net revenues increased $8.3 million primarily attributable to increased revenues from existing client programs. International Products net revenues increased $9.2 million primarily from higher retail revenue in our online channel partially offset by lower package revenue and an unfavorable currency impact of $7.3 million as a result of the stronger U.S. dollar.

Marketing and Commissions Expense. Marketing and commissions expense increased by $1.8 million, or 0.6%, to $305.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $303.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Marketing and commissions expense increased primarily due to increases in our International business primarily due to increased spending in our retail channel and was partially offset by decreases in our Membership business, primarily from delayed program launches, and our Insurance and Package business.

45

Operating Costs. Operating costs increased by $16.2 million, or 7.5%, to $233.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $217.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Operating costs were higher primarily due to higher fulfillment costs in our Membership business from higher membership and one-time conversion costs in our identity theft protection programs and our Loyalty business from the revenue growth in client programs and certain start up costs in our International business related to new markets.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense decreased by $31.3 million, or 32.1%, to $66.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $97.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily from the absence in 2012 of a special cash distribution of $14.8 million to option holders in connection with dividends paid by Affinion Holdings to stockholders in January 2011 and February 2011 and the reversal of a liability of $14.6 million in connection with anticipated earn-out payments originally recorded in 2011 for the Prospectiv acquisition.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets. An impairment charge for goodwill and certain intangible assets in the amount of $39.7 million related to our 2011 Prospectiv acquisition was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily the result of lower projected future cash flows and other negative marketplace events in the daily deals business. The impairment charge includes $31.5 million related to all of the goodwill for Prospectiv and $8.2 million related to certain intangible assets ascribed in the August 1, 2011 acquisition, primarily tradenames and technology.

Facility Exit Costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded facility exit costs in the amount of $1.3 million associated with the lease on a Webloyalty facility. These costs represent the present value of future lease payments and other expenses related to the facility through the expiration of the lease, net of any estimated sublease income.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $23.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $99.1 million from $122.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily from recording $16.9 million less amortization expense in 2012 as compared to 2011 related to intangible assets acquired in the Webloyalty acquisition, principally member relationships, and lower amortization of $5.6 million on the intangible assets acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the Cendant Marketing Services Division (the “Apollo Transactions”) as the majority of those intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis. This amortization expense is based upon an allocation of values to intangible assets and is being amortized over lives ranging from 3 years to 15 years.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $0.2 million, or 0.3%, to $74.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $74.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as a more favorable impact of interest rate swaps in 2012 as compared to 2011 substantially offset higher accreted interest on non-interest bearing liabilities.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased by $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to an increase in the current state and foreign tax liabilities and deferred federal and foreign tax liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2012, partially offset by a decrease in deferred state tax liabilities for the same period.

Our effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were (11.9)% and (7.5)%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is primarily a result of the decrease in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest from $62.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $58.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and an increase in income tax expense from $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Our tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income we earn in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and foreign income taxes and related foreign tax credits, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

46

Operating Segment Results

Net revenues and Segment EBITDA by operating segment are as follows:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Net Revenues									Segment EBITDA(1)
	2012			2011			Increase (Decrease)			2012			2011			Increase (Decrease)
	(in millions)
Affinion North America
Membership Products	$	377.4		$	378.2		$	(0.8	)	$	76.9		$	66.3		$	10.6
Insurance and Package Products		161.2			172.9			(11.7	)		50.5			54.2			(3.7	)
Loyalty Products		75.8			67.5			8.3			24.6			21.1			3.5
Eliminations		(1.3	)		(1.7	)		0.4			—			—			—
Total North America		613.1			616.9			(3.8	)		152.0			141.6			10.4
Affinion International
International Products		146.3			137.1			9.2			11.2			13.7			(2.5	)
Total products		759.4			754.0			5.4			163.2			155.3			7.9
Corporate		—			—			—			(8.9	)		(21.0	)		12.1
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		—			—			—			(39.7	)		—			(39.7	)
Total	$	759.4		$	754.0		$	5.4			114.6			134.3			(19.7	)
Depreciation and amortization											(99.1	)		(122.9	)		23.8
Income from operations										$	15.5		$	11.4		$	4.1

(1) See Segment EBITDA above and Note 11 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of Segment EBITDA and a reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to income from operations.

Affinion North America

Membership Products. Membership Products net revenues decreased by $0.8 million, or 0.2%, to $377.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $378.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Net revenues decreased primarily due to lower retail member volumes, primarily from the continued, but anticipated, attrition of the domestic member base of Webloyalty, which more than offset the higher revenues from higher average revenue per average retail member, revenues from the Prospectiv acquisition and higher volumes in wholesale arrangements.

Segment EBITDA increased by $10.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. Segment EBITDA increased due to lower general and administrative costs of $16.7 million which primarily resulted from the reversal of a liability of $14.6 million in connection with previously anticipated earn-out payments originally recorded in 2011 related to the Prospectiv acquisition, in addition to lower marketing and commissions of $4.2 million, partially offset by higher operating costs of $10.8 million. The lower marketing and commissions was primarily due to the timing of launches for certain marketing campaigns while the higher operating costs were principally due to increased costs associated with higher membership and one-time conversion costs for our identity theft protection programs.

Insurance and Package Products. Insurance and Package Products net revenues decreased by $11.7 million, or 6.8%, to $161.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $172.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Insurance revenue decreased approximately $9.5 million primarily from the absence in 2012 of a one-time payment from an insurance provider in the first quarter of 2011. Package revenue decreased approximately $2.2 million primarily from lower fee-based revenue from our NetGain product and to lower annualized net revenue per average package member.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the lower net revenues which were partially offset by lower marketing and commissions and lower general and administrative costs.

Loyalty Products. Revenues from Loyalty Products increased by $8.3 million, or 12.3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $75.8 million as compared to $67.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to growth from existing clients.

Segment EBITDA increased by $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, as the higher net revenue was partially offset by higher product and servicing costs.

47

Affinion International

International Products. International Products net revenues increased by $9.2 million, or 6.7%, to $146.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $137.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Net revenues increased primarily from higher retail revenue in our online channel, partially offset by lower package revenue and an unfavorable impact of $7.3 million as a result of the stronger U.S. dollar.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011 as the positive impact of the higher revenue was more than offset by higher marketing and commissions from increased spending in our retail channel and higher costs associated with start up activities related to new markets.

Corporate

Corporate costs decreased by $12.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the absence in 2012 of a charge for $14.8 million related to cash distributions made to option holders in connection with dividends paid by Affinion Holdings to its common stockholders in January and February of 2011 which was partially offset by a $3.3 million negative impact from foreign exchange on intercompany borrowings in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

An impairment charge for goodwill and certain intangible assets in the amount of $39.7 million related to our 2011 Prospectiv acquisition was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily the result of lower projected future cash flows and other negative marketplace events in the daily deals business. The impairment charge includes $31.5 million related to all of the goodwill for Prospectiv and $8.2 million related to certain intangible assets ascribed in the August 1, 2011 acquisition, primarily tradenames and technology.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Financial Condition—June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011			Increase (Decrease)
	(in millions)
Total assets	$	1,508.0		$	1,651.0		$	(143.0	)
Total liabilities		2,624.2			2,662.7			(38.5	)
Total deficit		(1,116.2	)		(1,011.7	)		(104.5	)

Total assets decreased by $143.0 million principally due to (i) a decrease in other intangibles, net of $83.2 million, principally due to amortization expense of $74.6 million and an $8.2 million impairment of intangible assets acquired in the Prospectiv acquisition, (ii) a decrease in cash of $37.8 million (see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Cash Flows”), and (iii) a decrease in goodwill of $32.5 million, principally related to a $31.5 million impairment of the goodwill established in connection with the Prospectiv acquisition. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in receivables of $21.7 million, principally due to the timing of payments from clients for loyalty services, including payments for gift cards utilized for loyalty program fulfillment, and the impact of seasonality of travel services.

Total liabilities decreased by $38.5 million, primarily due to a decrease in deferred revenue of $24.4 million due to the continuing shift of the membership base to monthly memberships, and a decrease in other long-term liabilities of $13.2 million, principally due to the release of the earn-out liability established in connection with the Prospectiv acquisition.

Total deficit increased by $104.5 million, principally due to a net loss attributable to the Company of $66.2 million, a return of capital to the Company’s parent of $37.0 million and foreign currency translation effect of $1.6 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity on both a short-term and long-term basis are cash on hand and cash generated through operating and financing activities. Our primary cash needs are to service our indebtedness and for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. Many of the Company’s significant costs are variable in nature, including marketing and commissions. The Company has a great degree of flexibility in the amount and timing of marketing expenditures and focuses its marketing expenditures on its most profitable marketing opportunities. Commissions correspond directly with revenue generated and have been decreasing as a percentage of revenue over the last several years. We believe that, based on our current operations and anticipated growth, our cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities and borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility will be

48

sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the next twelve months and in the foreseeable future, including quarterly amortization payments on our term loan facility under our $1.3 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility. The term loan facility also requires mandatory prepayments based on excess cash flows as defined in our amended and restated senior secured credit facility.

Affinion Group, Inc. is a holding company, with no direct operations and no significant assets other than the direct and indirect ownership of its subsidiaries. Because we conduct our operations through our subsidiaries, our cash flows and our ability to service our indebtedness is dependent upon cash dividends and distributions or other transfers from our subsidiaries. Payments to us by our subsidiaries are contingent upon our subsidiaries’ earnings, but are not limited by our debt agreements, including our senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 7.875% senior notes and our senior subordinated notes.

Although we historically have a working capital deficit, a major factor included in this deficit is deferred revenue resulting from the cash collected from annual memberships which is deferred until the appropriate refund period has concluded. In spite of our historical working capital deficit, we have been able to operate effectively primarily due to our substantial cash flows from operations and our available revolving credit facility. However, as the membership base continues to shift away from memberships billed annually to memberships billed monthly, it will have a negative effect on our operating cash flow. We anticipate that our working capital deficit will continue for the foreseeable future.

On January 18, 2011, utilizing available cash on hand, the Company paid a dividend of approximately $123.4 million to Affinion Holdings. Affinion Holdings utilized the proceeds of the dividend and available cash on hand to (i) redeem approximately $41.2 million liquidation preference of Affinion Holdings’ outstanding preferred stock, (ii) pay a dividend to Affinion Holdings’ stockholders (including holders of restricted stock units) of $1.35 per share (approximately $115.4 million in the aggregate), (iii) pay a one-time cash bonus to Affinion Holdings’ option holders of approximately $9.6 million and (iv) pay additional amounts for transaction fees and expenses.

On February 11, 2011, utilizing borrowings under the term loan facility, the Company paid a dividend of approximately $199.8 million to Affinion Holdings, and expects to use the balance of the proceeds for working capital and other corporate purposes and to fund future strategic initiatives. Affinion Holdings utilized the proceeds of the dividend to (i) redeem approximately $5.4 million liquidation preference of Affinion Holdings’ outstanding preferred stock, (ii) pay a dividend to Affinion Holdings’ stockholders (including holders of restricted stock units) of $1.50 per share (approximately $128.2 million in the aggregate), (iii) pay a one-time cash bonus to certain of Affinion Holdings’ option holders of approximately $5.2 million and (iv) pay additional amounts for transaction fees and expenses.

On April 9, 2012, the Company declared, and on April 10, 2012, the Company paid a dividend of $37.0 million to Affinion Holdings, utilizing available cash on hand. Affinion Holdings expects to utilize the proceeds of the dividend to make future interest payments on its senior notes.

Cash Flows—Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

At June 30, 2012, we had $48.5 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand, a decrease of $28.3 million from $76.8 million at June 30, 2011. The following table summarizes our cash flows and compares changes in our cash and cash equivalents on hand to the same period in the prior year.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			Change
	(in millions)
Cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	33.7		$	28.4		$	5.3
Investing activities		(28.2	)		(1.0	)		(27.2	)
Financing activities		(42.9	)		(73.1	)		30.2
Effect of exchange rate changes		(0.4	)		1.4			(1.8	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	$	(37.8	)	$	(44.3	)	$	6.5

Operating Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we generated $5.3 million more cash from operating activities than during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Segment EBITDA decreased by $19.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011 (see “—Results of Operations”). Accounts payable and accrued expenses generated cash flows

49

that were $40.2 million more favorable due to the impact of the timing of payments to travel vendors, primarily in the International travel business, and certain accruals recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2011 related to the Webloyalty acquisition, partially offset by the impact of timing of payments for gift cards utilized for loyalty program fulfillment. This favorability was partially offset by less favorable cash flow generated by accounts receivable due to timing of receipts, including the impact of new loyalty program clients and growth in loyalty programs with existing clients, and timing of marketing support payments from insurance carriers.

Investing Activities

We used $27.2 million more cash in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we used $27.2 million for capital expenditures and $1.2 million for acquisition-related payments. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we acquired $26.1 million of cash as a result of our non-cash acquisition of Webloyalty and used $24.9 million for capital expenditures and $3.6 million for capital expenditures.

Financing Activities

We used $30.2 million less cash in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we paid dividends to our parent company of $37.0 million and made principal payments on borrowings of $5.9 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we borrowed an additional $250.0 million under the term loan facility under our senior secured credit facility, made principal payments on our debt of $5.9 million and incurred financing costs of $5.5 million. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we paid dividends of $323.2 million to our parent company.

Credit Facilities and Long-Term Debt

As a result of the Apollo Transactions, we became a highly leveraged company, and we have incurred additional indebtedness and refinancing indebtedness since the Apollo Transactions. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $1.9 billion in indebtedness. Payments required to service this indebtedness have substantially increased our liquidity requirements as compared to prior years.

As part of the Apollo Transactions, we issued senior notes, entered into a senior subordinated bridge loan facility and entered into our senior secured credit facility, consisting of a term loan facility in the principal amount of $860.0 million (which amount does not reflect the $231.0 million in principal prepayments that we made prior to amendment and restatement of the senior secured credit facility in April 2010) and a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $100.0 million.

On April 26, 2006, we issued $355.5 million aggregate principal amount of 11 ¹/₂% senior subordinated notes due October 15, 2015 (the “senior subordinated notes”) and applied the gross proceeds of $350.5 million to repay $349.5 million of outstanding borrowings under our senior subordinated loan facility, plus accrued interest including as part of refinancing our senior subordinated bridge loan facility, and used cash on hand to pay fees and expenses associated with such issuance. The interest on our senior subordinated notes is payable semi-annually. We may redeem some or all of the senior subordinated notes at the redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes. The senior subordinated notes are unsecured obligations. The senior subordinated notes are guaranteed by the same subsidiaries that guarantee our senior secured credit facility and our 7.875% senior notes. The senior subordinated notes contain restrictive covenants related primarily to our ability to distribute dividends to our parent, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies.

On April 9, 2010, the Company, as borrower, and Affinion Holdings, as guarantor, entered into a $1.0 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility with its lenders, amending our senior secured credit facility. We refer to the amended and restated senior secured credit facility, as amended from time to time, including by the Incremental Assumption Agreements (as defined below) as “our senior secured credit facility”. Our senior secured credit facility initially consisted of a five-year $125.0 million revolving credit facility and an $875.0 million term loan facility.

On November 19, 2010, the Company completed a private offering of $475.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior notes due 2018 (the “7.875% senior notes”) providing net proceeds of $471.5 million. The 7.875% senior notes bear interest at 7.875% per annum payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The 7.875% senior notes will mature on December 15, 2018. The 7.875% senior notes are redeemable at the Company’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 7.875% senior notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. The Company’s obligations

50

under the 7.875% senior notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each of the Company’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee the Company’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility. The 7.875% senior notes and guarantees thereof are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank equally with all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The 7.875% senior notes are effectively subordinated to the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured indebtedness, including the Company’s obligations under its senior secured credit facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The 7.875% senior notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of each of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries that are not guarantors. On August 24, 2011, pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the 7.875% senior notes, the Company completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the then-outstanding 7.875% senior notes into a like principal amount of 7.875% senior notes that have been registered under the Securities Act. The Company used substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering of the 7.875% senior notes to finance the purchase of all of then-outstanding senior notes that were previously issued in 2005, 2006 and 2009.

On December 13, 2010, the Company, as borrower, Affinion Holdings and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into an Incremental Assumption Agreement with two of its lenders (the “Revolver Incremental Assumption Agreement,” and together with the Term Loan Incremental Assumption Agreement, the “Incremental Assumption Agreements”) which resulted in an increase in the revolving credit facility from $125.0 million to $160.0 million, with a further increase to $165.0 million upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. These conditions were satisfied in January 2011 and the revolving credit facility was increased to $165.0 million. On February 11, 2011, the Company, as borrower, and Affinion Holdings, and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into, and simultaneously closed under, the Term Loan Incremental Assumption Agreement, which resulted in an increase in the term loan facility from $875.0 million to $1.125 billion.

The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility and a swingline loan subfacility. The term loan facility matures in October 2016. However, the term loan facility will mature on the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity of the senior subordinated notes unless, prior to that date, (a) the maturity for our senior subordinated notes is extended to a date that is at least 91 days after the maturity of the term loan facility or (b) the obligations under our senior subordinated notes are (i) repaid in full or (ii) refinanced, replaced or defeased in full with new loans and/or debt securities with maturity dates occurring after the maturity date of the term loan. The term loan facility provides for quarterly amortization payments totaling 1% per annum, with the balance payable upon the final maturity date. The term loan facility also requires mandatory prepayments of the outstanding term loans based on excess cash flow (as defined), if any, and the proceeds from certain specified transactions. The interest rates with respect to the term loan facility and the revolving loans under the credit facility are based on, at our option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 3.50%, or (b) the highest of (i) Bank of America, N.A.’s prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50%, in each case plus 2.50%. The effective interest rate on the term loan for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was 5% per annum. Our obligations under our senior secured credit facility are, and our obligations under any interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements entered into with a lender or any of its affiliates will be, guaranteed by Affinion Holdings and by each of our existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. Our senior secured credit facility is secured to the extent legally permissible by substantially all the assets of (i) Affinion Holdings, which consists of a pledge of all our capital stock and (ii) us and the subsidiary guarantors, including but not limited to: (a) a pledge of substantially all capital stock held by us or any subsidiary guarantor and (b) security interests in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of us and each subsidiary guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. Our senior secured credit facility also contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants in our senior secured credit facility include, among other things, limitations (all of which are subject to certain exceptions) on our (and in certain cases, Affinion Holdings’) ability to declare dividends and make other distributions, redeem or repurchase our capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain of our subordinated indebtedness; make loans or investments (including acquisitions); incur additional indebtedness (subject to certain exceptions); enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends; merge or enter into acquisitions; sell our assets; and enter into transactions with our affiliates. The credit facility also requires us to comply with financial maintenance covenants with a maximum ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in our senior secured credit facility) and a minimum ratio of EBITDA to cash interest expense. The April 2010 proceeds of the term loan under our senior secured credit facility were utilized to repay the outstanding balance of the then existing senior secured term loan, including accrued interest, of $629.7 million and pay fees and expenses of approximately $27.0 million. The remaining proceeds are available for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including permitted acquisitions and investments. Any borrowings under the revolving credit facility are available to fund Affinion’s working capital requirements, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes.

51

In January 2011, utilizing available cash on hand, the Company paid a dividend of approximately $123.4 million to Affinion Holdings. Affinion Holdings utilized the proceeds of the dividend and available cash on hand to (i) redeem Affinion Holdings’ outstanding preferred stock with a liquidation preference of approximately $41.2 million, (ii) pay a dividend to Affinion Holdings’ stockholders (including holders of restricted stock units) of $1.35 per share (approximately $115.4 million in the aggregate), (iii) pay a one-time cash bonus to Affinion Holdings’ option holders of approximately $9.6 million and (iv) pay additional amounts for transaction fees and expenses.

In February 2011, the Company used a portion of the Incremental Term Loans to pay a dividend of approximately $199.8 million to Affinion Holdings, and expects to use the balance of the proceeds for working capital and other corporate purposes and to fund future strategic initiatives. Affinion Holdings used the proceeds of the dividend to (i) redeem Affinion Holdings’ outstanding preferred stock with a liquidation preference of approximately $5.4 million, (ii) pay a dividend to Affinion Holdings’ stockholders (including holders of restricted stock units) of $1.50 per share (approximately $128.2 million in the aggregate), (iii) pay a one-time cash bonus to certain of Affinion Holdings’ option holders of approximately $5.2 million and (iv) pay additional amounts for transaction fees and expenses.

At June 30, 2012, the Company had $1,101.6 million outstanding under the term loan facility, $475.0 million ($472.2 million net of discount) outstanding under the 7.875% senior notes and $355.5 million ($353.7 million net of discount) outstanding under the senior subordinated notes. At June 30, 2012, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the Company had $158.1 million available under the revolving credit facility after giving effect to the issuance of $6.9 million of letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility.

Covenant Compliance

Our senior secured credit facility and the indentures that govern our 7.875% senior notes and our senior subordinated notes contain various restrictive covenants. They prohibit us from prepaying indebtedness that is junior to such debt (subject to certain exceptions). Our senior secured credit facility requires us to maintain a specified minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio. The interest coverage ratio as defined in our senior secured credit facility (Adjusted EBITDA, as defined, to interest expense, as defined) must be greater than 1.85 to 1.0 at June 30, 2012. The consolidated leverage ratio as defined in our senior secured credit facility (total debt, as defined, to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined) must be less than 5.75 to 1.0 at June 30, 2012. In addition, our senior secured credit facility, among other things, restricts our ability to incur indebtedness or liens, make investments or declare or pay any dividends to our parent. The indentures governing the 7.875% senior notes and the senior subordinated notes, among other things: (a) limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments and enter into certain transactions with affiliates; (b) limit our ability to enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make certain payments to us; and (c) place restrictions on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to merge or consolidate with any other person or sell, assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. However, all of these covenants are subject to significant exceptions. As of June 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its debt agreements and expects to be in compliance over the next twelve months.

We have the ability to incur additional debt, subject to limitations imposed by our senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 7.875% senior notes and senior subordinated notes. Under the indentures governing our 7.875% senior notes and our senior subordinated notes, in addition to specified permitted indebtedness, we will be able to incur additional indebtedness as long as on a pro forma basis our fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges) is at least 2.0 to 1.0.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to GAAP Financial Measures

Adjusted EBITDA consists of income from operations before depreciation and amortization further adjusted to exclude non-cash and unusual items and other adjustments permitted in our debt agreements to test the permissibility of certain types of transactions, including debt incurrence. We believe that the inclusion of Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate as a liquidity measure. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of liquidity or financial performance under U.S. GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of cash flows, as a measure of liquidity, as an alternative to operating or net income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP or as an indicator of operating performance.

Set forth below is a reconciliation of our consolidated net cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended June 30, 2012 to Adjusted EBITDA.

52

	Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2012(a)
	(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	112.3
Interest expense, net		147.4
Income tax expense		7.5
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts		0.6
Amortization of debt discount and financing costs		(8.4	)
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap		(4.2	)
Deferred income taxes		(2.9	)
Payment received for assumption of loyalty points program liability		(4.2	)
Changes in assets and liabilities		55.3
Effect of the Apollo Transactions, reorganizations, certain legal costs and net cost savings(b)		25.3
Other, net(c)		23.8
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding pro forma adjustments(d)		352.5
Effect of the pro forma adjustments(e)		10.3
Adjusted EBITDA, including pro forma adjustments(f)	$	362.8

(a) Represents consolidated financial data for the year ended December 31, 2011, minus consolidated financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2011, plus consolidated financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

(b) Eliminates the effect of the Apollo Transactions and legal costs for certain legal matters and costs associated with severance incurred.

(c) Eliminates (i) net changes in certain reserves, (ii) foreign currency gains and losses related to unusual, non-recurring intercompany transactions, (iii) the loss from an investment accounted for under the equity method, (iv) costs related to acquisitions and (v) consulting fees paid to Apollo.

(d) Adjusted EBITDA, excluding pro forma adjustments, does not give pro forma effect to (i) our acquisition of Prospectiv that was completed in the third quarter of 2011 and (ii) the projected annualized benefits of restructurings and other cost savings initiatives in connection with the Webloyalty and Prospectiv acquisitions. However, we do make such accretive pro forma adjustments as if such acquisition and such restructurings and cost savings initiatives had occurred on July 1, 2011 in calculating the Adjusted EBITDA under the amended and restated senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 7.875% senior notes and senior subordinated notes.

(e) Gives effect to the completion of the Prospectiv acquisition and the projected annualized benefits of restructurings and other cost savings initiatives in connection with the Webloyalty and Prospectiv acquisitions as if such acquisitions and restructurings and cost savings initiatives had occurred on July 1, 2011.

(f) Adjusted EBITDA, including pro forma adjustments, gives pro forma effect to the adjustments discussed in (e) above.

Set forth below is a reconciliation of our consolidated net loss attributable to Affinion Group, Inc. for the twelve months ended June 30, 2012 to Adjusted EBITDA as required by our credit facility and the indentures governing our 7.875% senior notes and senior subordinated notes.

53

	Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2012(a)
	(in millions)
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group, Inc.	$	(108.1	)
Interest expense, net		147.4
Income tax expense		7.5
Non-controlling interest		0.8
Depreciation and amortization		214.9
Effect of the Apollo Transactions, reorganizations and non-recurring revenues and gains(b)		(1.3	)
Certain legal costs(c)		13.0
Net cost savings(d)		13.6
Other, net(e)		64.7
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding pro forma adjustments(f)		352.5
Effect of the pro forma adjustments(g)		10.3
Adjusted EBITDA, including pro forma adjustments(h)	$	362.8
Interest coverage ratio(i)		2.36
Consolidated leverage ratio(j)		5.22
Fixed charge coverage ratio(k)		2.38

(a) Represents consolidated financial data for the year ended December 31, 2011, minus consolidated financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2011, plus consolidated financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

(b) Eliminates the effect of the Apollo Transactions.

(c) Represents the elimination of legal costs for certain legal matters.

(d) Represents the elimination of costs associated with severance incurred.

(e) Eliminates (i) net changes in certain reserves, (ii) share-based compensation expense, including payments to option holders, (iii) foreign currency gains and losses related to unusual, non-recurring intercompany transactions, (iv) the loss from an investment accounted for under the equity method, (v) costs related to acquisitions, (vi) consulting fees paid to Apollo, (vii) facility exit costs and (viii) the impairment charge related to the goodwill and certain intangible assets of Prospectiv.

(f) Adjusted EBITDA, excluding pro forma adjustments, does not give pro forma effect to (i) our acquisition of Prospectiv that was completed in the third quarter of 2011 and (ii) the projected annualized benefits of restructurings and other cost savings initiatives in connection with the Webloyalty and Prospectiv acquisitions. However, we do make such accretive pro forma adjustments as if such acquisition and such restructurings and cost savings initiatives had occurred on July 1, 2011 in calculating the Adjusted EBITDA under the amended and restated senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 7.875% senior notes and senior subordinated notes.

(g) Gives effect to the completion of the Prospectiv acquisition and the projected annualized benefits of restructurings and other cost savings initiatives in connection with the Webloyalty and Prospectiv acquisitions as if such acquisitions and restructurings and cost savings initiatives had occurred on July 1, 2011.

(h) Adjusted EBITDA, including pro forma adjustments, gives pro forma effect to the adjustments discussed in (g) above.

(i) The interest coverage ratio is defined in our amended and restated senior secured credit facility (Adjusted EBITDA, as defined, to interest expense, as defined). The interest coverage ratio must be greater than 1.85 to 1.0 at June 30, 2012.

(j) The consolidated leverage ratio is defined in our amended and restated senior secured credit facility (total debt, as defined, to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined). The consolidated leverage ratio must be less than 5.75 to 1.0 at June 30, 2012.

(k) The fixed charge coverage ratio is defined in the indentures governing our 7.875% senior notes and our senior subordinated notes (consolidated cash flows, as defined, which is equivalent to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in our amended and restated senior secured credit facility) to fixed charges, as defined). The calculation of fixed charges excludes the amortization of deferred financing costs associated with the amendment and restatement of our credit facility on April 9, 2010.

54

Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.’s Dependence on Us to Service its Obligations

On October 5, 2010, Affinion Holdings issued $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11.625% senior notes due November 15, 2015 (the “Affinion Holdings senior notes”), and applied the gross proceeds, together with cash distributions from the Company, to repay the Affinion Holdings Loan Agreement (as defined below) in full, to pay the related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The interest on the Affinion Holdings senior notes is payable semi-annually. Affinion Holdings may redeem some or all of its senior notes at the redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the Affinion Holdings senior notes. The Affinion Holdings senior notes are unsecured obligations and are not guaranteed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Affinion Holdings senior notes contain restrictive covenants related primarily to Affinion Holdings’ ability to distribute dividends to Affinion Holdings’ stockholders, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. As a holding company with no significant assets other than the ownership of 100% of our common stock, Affinion Holdings will depend on our cash flows to make cash interest payments on the Affinion Holdings senior notes.

As described above, we expect that Affinion Holdings will rely on distributions from us in order to pay cash amounts due in respect of the Affinion Holdings senior notes. However, our ability to make distributions to Affinion Holdings is restricted by covenants contained in our amended and restated senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 7.875% senior notes and our senior subordinated notes and by Delaware law. To the extent we make distributions to Affinion Holdings, the amount of cash available to us to pay principal of, and interest on, our outstanding debt, including our amended and restated senior secured credit facility, our 7.875% senior notes and our senior subordinated notes, will be reduced, and we would have less cash available for other purposes, which could negatively impact our financial condition, our results of operations and our ability to maintain or expand our business. A failure to pay principal of, or interest on, our debt, including our amended and restated senior secured credit facility, our 7.875% senior notes and our senior subordinated notes, would constitute an event of default under the applicable debt agreements, giving the holders of that debt the right to accelerate its maturity. In addition, to the extent we are not able to make distributions to Affinion Holdings because of the restrictions in our debt agreements or otherwise, then Affinion Holdings may not have sufficient cash on hand to service its obligations under the Affinion Holdings senior notes. Any failure by Affinion Holdings to pay principal of, or interest on, the Affinion Holdings senior notes would constitute an event of default under our amended and restated senior secured credit facility, giving the lenders thereunder the right to accelerate the repayment of all borrowings thereunder, which acceleration would also give rise to an event of default under our 7.875% senior notes and senior subordinated notes. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash available to repay it in full and we may be unable to refinance such debt on satisfactory terms or at all.

Debt Repurchases

We or our affiliates have, in the past, and may, from time to time in the future, purchase any of our or Affinion Holdings’ indebtedness. Any such future purchases may be made through open market or privately negotiated transactions with third parties or pursuant to one or more tender or exchange offers or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices as we or any such affiliates may determine.

Critical Accounting Policies

In presenting our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported therein. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies related to revenue recognition, accounting for marketing costs, stock-based compensation, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, valuation of interest rate swaps and valuation of tax assets and liabilities could potentially affect our reported results and as such, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain, as they pertain to future events. However, certain events outside our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and assumptions. We believe that the estimates and assumptions used when preparing our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were the most appropriate at the time. Significant estimates include accounting for profit sharing receivables from insurance carriers, accruals and income tax valuation allowances, litigation accruals, the estimated fair value of stock based compensation, estimated fair values of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and estimated fair values of financial instruments. In addition, we refer you to our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, included in our Form 10-K for a summary of our significant accounting policies.

55

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Interest Rate Swap

In January 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap effective February 21, 2011. The swap has a notional amount of $500.0 million and terminates on October 17, 2012. Under the swap, the Company has agreed to pay a fixed rate of interest of 2.985% payable on a quarterly basis with the first interest payment due on May 31, 2011, in exchange for receiving floating payments based on a three-month LIBOR on the notional amount for each applicable period.

The interest rate swap is recorded at fair value, either as an asset or liability. The change in the fair value of the swap, which is not designated as a hedging instrument, is included in interest expense in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded interest expense, representing realized and unrealized gains and losses, of $0.1 million and $2.1 million, respectively, related to the interest rate swap and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded interest expense, representing realized and unrealized gains and losses, of $1.0 million and $2.7 million, respectively, related to the interest rate swap.

The following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity for the Company’s long-term debt as of June 30, 2012 (dollars are in millions unless otherwise indicated):

	2012			2013			2014			2015			2016			2017 and Thereafter			Total		Fair Value At June 30, 2012
Fixed rate debt	$	0.3		$	0.5		$	0.4		$	355.7		$	0.1		$	475.0		$	832.0	$	708.6
Average interest rate		9.43	%		9.43	%		9.43	%		9.43	%		7.88	%		7.88	%
Variable rate debt	$	5.6		$	11.3		$	11.2		$	11.3		$	1,062.2					$	1,101.6	$	1,005.2
Average interest rate(a)		5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%
Variable to fixed interest rate swaps(b)																					$	5.1
Average pay rate		2.99	%
Average receive rate		0.46	%

(a) Average interest rate is based on rates in effect at June 30, 2012.

(b) The fair value of the interest rate swap is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at June 30, 2012. The fair value has been determined after consideration of the interest rate yield curve and the creditworthiness of the counterparty to the interest rate swap.

We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

In August 2010, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract under which the Company agreed to sell GBP 3.5 million and receive $5.5 million thirty days after the contract date. In September 2010, and in each subsequent month, upon settlement, the Company entered into a new thirty day forward contract. In April 2011, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract under which the Company agreed to sell GBP 4.3 million and receive $7.2 million thirty days after the contract date. In May 2011, and in each subsequent month, upon settlement, the Company entered into a new thirty day forward contract. In May 2012, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract under which the Company agreed to sell EUR 7.7 million and receive $9.5 million thirty days after the contract date. In June 2012, upon settlement, the Company entered into a new thirty day forward contract. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized a realized gain on the forward contracts of $0.1 million and a realized loss on the forward contracts of $0.1 million, respectively, and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized a realized gain on the forward contracts of $0.2 million and a realized loss on the forward contracts of less than $0.1 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had a $0.2 million unrealized loss on the foreign currency forward contracts. We generally do not utilize foreign currency forward contracts as we do not consider our foreign currency risk to be material, although the Company continues to evaluate its foreign currency exposures in light of the current volatility in the foreign currency markets.

At June 30, 2012, the Company’s estimated fair value of Affinion’s foreign currency forward contracts is based upon available market information. The fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts is based on significant other observable inputs, adjusted

56

for contract restrictions and other terms specific to the foreign currency forward contracts. The fair value has been determined after consideration of foreign currency exchange rates and the creditworthiness of the party to the foreign currency forward contracts. The counterparty to the foreign currency forward contracts is a major financial institution. The Company does not expect any losses from non-performance by this counterparty.

Credit Risk and Exposure

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of receivables, profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers and prepaid commissions. We manage such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties. As of June 30, 2012, approximately $59.9 million of the profit-sharing receivable was due from one insurance carrier. Receivables and profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers are from various marketing, insurance and business partners and we maintain an allowance for losses, based upon expected collectability. Commission advances are periodically evaluated as to recovery.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures. The Company, under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has established disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The Disclosure Controls are also intended to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our “internal controls over financial reporting” (“Internal Controls”) will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.

As of June 30, 2012, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of June 30, 2012, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

57

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceeding.

Information required by this Item is contained in Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements within Part I of this Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following risk factors supplement and/or update the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Our business is increasingly subject to U.S. and foreign government regulation, which could impede our ability to market our programs and services and reduce our profitability.

We market our programs and services through various distribution media, including direct mail, point-of-sale marketing, telemarketing, online marketing and other methods. These media are regulated by state, federal and foreign laws and we believe that these media will be subject to increasing regulation, particularly in the area of consumer privacy. Such regulation may limit our ability to solicit or sign up new customers or to offer products or services to existing customers.

Our U.S. membership and insurance products are subject to extensive regulation and oversight by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”), state attorneys general and other state regulatory agencies, including state insurance regulators. Our marketing partners are subject to various federal and state consumer protection laws designed to ensure that consumers are protected from unfair and deceptive marketing practices. Moreover, our financial institution marketing partners are subject to oversight by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) as described below. Pursuant to such oversight, the financial institutions may be required to oversee their service providers, vendors or products sold to customers of such financial institutions. Our programs and services involve the use of non-public personal information that is subject to federal consumer privacy laws, such as the Financial Modernization Act of 1999, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and various state laws governing consumer privacy, such as California’s SB 1, SB 1386 and others. Additionally, telemarketing of our programs and services is subject to federal and state telemarketing regulations, including the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule, the FCC’s Telephone Consumer Protection Act and implementing regulations, as well as various state telemarketing laws and regulations. Furthermore, our insurance products are subject to various state laws and regulations governing the business of insurance, including, without limitation, laws and regulations governing the administration, underwriting, marketing, solicitation or sale of insurance programs. Additional federal or state laws, including subsequent amendments to existing laws, could impede our ability to market our programs and services and reduce our revenues and profitability.

Similarly our operations in the European Economic Area are also subject to often strict regulation. These laws include, in particular, restrictions on our insurance intermediary activities as a regulated financial service requiring prior authorization and adherence to various rules on management and controls, documentation, complaints handling, financial promotions and the contracting process with consumers. In addition our marketing operations are subject to regulation including data protection legislation requiring notification and obtaining consent for marketing and also advertising rules regarding the content of marketing messages. “Distance selling” information and cancellation rules must also be followed when we contract with consumers at a distance including via post, phone or website. In the latter case, electronic commerce rules also come into play. Some of our products in the U.K. also involve the provision of services classed as consumer credit and therefore require additional licenses to be applied for and maintained. Additionally, individuals in the U.K. and other European countries have rights to prevent direct marketing to them by telephone, fax or email. Recent additions to the regulatory landscape to which we are subject in the European Economic Area include restrictions on what are considered to be unfair or misleading commercial practices and new general rules on providing services involving information and basic complaints handling rules to be followed. While many of these rules are based on European Directives, different jurisdictions have varying implementation and enforcement approaches which can be difficult to navigate. New rules or changes in existing ones at a European or Member State level in countries where we operate could restrict our current practices and the loss of required authorization or licenses would severely inhibit our service offerings.

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) mandates the most wide-ranging overhaul of financial industry regulation in decades. Dodd-Frank was signed into law on July 21, 2010, and is in the process of being fully implemented. Dodd-Frank provides a regulatory framework and requires that regulators draft, review and approve, and implement numerous regulations and conduct studies that are likely to lead to more regulations. As part of this, Dodd-Frank created the CFPB that became operational on July 21, 2011, and has been given authority to regulate all consumer financial products sold by banks and non-bank companies.

The overall impact of these regulations on us and our clients is difficult to estimate, in part because certain regulations need to be adopted by the CFPB with respect to consumer financial products and services and in part because regulations that have been adopted

58

have only recently taken effect. These new and contemplated regulations could impose additional reporting, supervisory and regulatory requirements on, as well as result in inquiries of, us and our marketing partners that could delay or cease marketing campaigns with certain marketing partners or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the CFPB or other bank oversight federal agency such as the OCC have issued and may continue to issue a rulings or findings or enter into a settlement or consent order with one or more of our financial institution marketing partners that relates to the products or services we provide to such financial institution, this could adversely affect our marketing with that partner or require changes to our products or services to consumers that could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and result of operations.. Moreover, other financial institutions may view such existing or future rulings, findings, settlements or consent orders as imposing a standard it will comply with. As a result, marketing partners could delay or cease marketing with us or require changes to our products or services to consumers that could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and result of operations. In addition, even an inadvertent failure to comply with these laws and regulations, as well as rapidly evolving expected standards, could adversely affect our business or our reputation.

Compliance with these federal, state and foreign regulations is generally our responsibility, and we could be subject to a variety of enforcement and/or private actions for any failure to comply with such regulations. Any changes to such regulations could materially increase our compliance costs. The risk of our noncompliance with any rules and regulations enforced by a federal or state consumer protection authority or an enforcement agency in a foreign jurisdiction may subject us or our management to fines or various forms of civil or criminal prosecution, any of which could impede our ability to market our programs and services and reduce our revenues and profitability. Certain types of noncompliance may also result in giving our marketing partners the right to terminate certain of our contracts. Also, the media often publicizes perceived noncompliance with consumer protection regulations and violations of notions of fair dealing with customers, and our industry is susceptible to peremptory charges by the media and others of regulatory noncompliance and unfair dealing.

Our marketing partners are subject to a wide variety of federal, state and foreign laws and regulations, including banking, insurance and privacy laws and supervisory audits and inquiries. Changes in the laws or regulations applicable to our marketing partners or the failure of our marketing partners to comply with such laws and regulations or the outcome of supervisory audits and inquiries could result in our marketing partners terminating their contracts with us, their inability to facilitate payment processing or their ceasing or changing marketing services, all of which could have a material impact on our business.

Consumer complaints with respect to our industry have resulted and may result in state and federal regulatory and other investigations. On December 29, 2010, the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act was enacted. The legislation prohibits Online Data-pass Marketing and requires additional disclosure relating to the online marketing of, and billing for, membership programs in the online post-transaction environment. Several states have passed similar laws restricting Online Data-pass Marketing. Since the Company had ceased Online Data-pass Marketing in January 2010, more than eleven months prior to the enactment of such legislation, we do not expect such legislation to have a material adverse effect on our business.

Over the past several years, there has also been proposed legislation in several states that may interfere with our marketing practices. For example, over the past several years many states have proposed legislation that would allow customers to limit the amount of unsolicited direct mail they receive. To date, we are not aware of any state that has actually passed legislation that would create a “Do-Not-Mail” registry or which would otherwise allow customers to restrict the amount of unsolicited direct mail that they receive. We believe there are three states that are currently considering some form of “Do-Not-Mail” legislation. Additionally, several bills have been proposed in Congress that could restrict the collection and dissemination of personal information for marketing purposes. If such legislation is passed in one or more states or by Congress, it could impede our ability to market our programs and services and reduce our revenues and profitability.

We are subject to legal actions and governmental investigations that could require us to incur significant expenses and, if resolved adversely to us, could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers, reduce revenues and profitability and damage our reputation.

We are involved in claims, legal proceedings and state and federal governmental inquiries related to employment matters, contract disputes, business and marketing practices, trademark and copyright infringement claims and other commercial matters. Additionally, if our marketing partners become involved in legal proceedings or governmental inquiries relating to our products or marketing practices we may be subject to indemnification obligations under our marketing agreements. While we cannot predict the outcome of pending suits, claims, investigations and inquiries, the cost of responding to and defending such suits, as well as the ultimate resolution of any of these matters, could require us to incur significant expenses and, if resolved adversely to us, could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers, reduce revenues and profitability and damage our reputation. There can be no assurance that our accruals for legal actions or investigations will be sufficient to satisfy all related claims and expenses.

59

Between December 2008 and December 2011, the Company received inquiries from numerous state attorneys general relating to the marketing of its membership programs and its compliance with consumer protection statutes. The Company responded to the states’ request for documents and information and is in active discussions with such states regarding its investigations and the resolution of these matters. Settlement of such matters may include payment by the Company of the costs of the states’ investigation, restitution to consumers and injunctive relief.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1*	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).
31.2*	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).
32.1**	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2**	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101.INS XBRL†	Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

† Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, the Company is deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and is not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as the Company has made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amends the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability.

60

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	AFFINION GROUP, INC.
Date: July 26, 2012	By:	/S/    TODD H. SIEGEL
		Todd H. Siegel
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

S-1

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1*	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).
31.2*	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).
32.1**	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2**	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101.INS XBRL†	Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE XBRL†	Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith

† Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, the Company is deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and is not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as the Company has made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amends the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability.