XML 93 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

19. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company classifies the assets and liabilities that require measurement of fair value on a recurring basis based on the priority of the observable and market-based sources of data into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

  •  

Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.

 

  •  

Level 2 – Valuations based on significant other observable inputs other than those included in Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

  •  

Level 3 – Valuations based on unobservable inputs such as when observable inputs are not available or inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

The following table presents for each of the fair value levels, the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 (amounts in thousands):

 

     December 31, 2013      December 31, 2012  
     Level 1      Level 2      Total
Balance
     Level 1      Level 2      Total
Balance
 

Assets

                 

Fixed maturities

                 

Federally-Insured certificates of deposits

      $ 1,057       $ 1,057          $ 914       $ 914   

Investment grade corporate bonds

        6,011         6,011            3,108         3,108   

Short-term investments

                 

Money market funds

   $ 60            60       $ 93            93   

Federally-Insured certificates of deposits

        201         201            301         301   

Deferred compensation investments(a)

                 

Equity mutual fund investments

     419            419         313            313   

State guarantee fund deposits(b)

                 

Government securities

     230            230         230            230   

Federally-Insured certificates of deposits

        50         50            50         50   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 709       $ 7,319       $ 8,028       $ 636       $ 4,373       $ 5,009   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities

                 

Interest rate swap(c)

      $ 56       $ 56          $ 41       $ 41   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $         $ 56       $ 56       $         $ 41       $ 41   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(a)

Included as a trading security in other assets

(b)

Included in other assets

(c)

Included in other payables and accruals

The Company measures fair value using the following valuation methodologies. The Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of the deferred compensation investments and certain state fund guarantee deposits; such items are classified as Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy. Examples include government securities and mutual fund equity securities. The Company primarily bases fair value for investments in fixed-maturity securities (including federally-insured certificates of deposits and investment grade corporate bonds) on quoted market prices or on prices from a pricing vendor, an outside resource that supplies independent securities pricing, dividend, corporate action and descriptive information to support fund pricing, securities operations, research and portfolio management. The Company obtains and reviews the pricing service’s valuation methodologies and validates these prices using various inputs including quotes from other independent regulatory sources. When deemed necessary, the Company validates prices by replicating a sample using a discounted cash flow model. Such items are classified as Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy. The Company obtains a price from an independent vendor to determine the fair value of the interest rate swap. The independent vendor uses a discounted cash flow method whereby the significant observable inputs include the replacement interest rates of similar swap instruments in the market and swap curves; such items are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no assets or liabilities that were required to be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.