XML 37 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Fair Value Measurements 
Fair Value Measurements

Note 10 – Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" ("ASC 820"), among other matters, requires enhanced disclosures about investments that are measured and reported at fair value. ASC 820 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily-available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

Investments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level I – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. The type of investments included in Level I include listed equities and listed derivatives. As required by ASC 820, the Company does not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where Evercore holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.

Level II – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. The estimated fair values of these securities are based on quoted market prices provided by external pricing services.

Level III – Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

The following table presents the categorization of investments and certain other assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

     September 30, 2011  
     Level I      Level II      Level III      Total  

Corporate Bonds, Municipal Bonds and Other Debt Securities (1)

   $ —         $ 92,043       $ —         $ 92,043   

Seed Capital Investments

     13,155         1,885         —           15,040   

Mutual Funds

     8,476         —           —           8,476   

Financial Instruments Owned and Pledged as Collateral at Fair Value

     102,100         —           —           102,100   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets Measured At Fair Value

   $ 123,731       $ 93,928       $ —         $ 217,659   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     December 31, 2010   
     Level I      Level II      Level III      Total  

Corporate Bonds, Municipal Bonds and Other Debt Securities (1)

   $ —         $ 89,931       $ —         $ 89,931   

Seed Capital Investments

     15,588         749         —           16,337   

Financial Instruments Owned and Pledged as Collateral at Fair Value

     52,217         —           —           52,217   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets Measured At Fair Value

   $ 67,805       $ 90,680       $ —         $ 158,485   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(1) Includes $52,801 and $13,438 of municipal bonds and commercial paper classified within Cash and Cash Equivalents on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment.

The Company had no transfers between fair value levels during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.