XML 45 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial Instruments Reported at Fair Value - Recurring
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015, aggregated by the applicable level in the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
$

 
$
427

 
$

 
$
427

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
$

 
$
2,370

 
$

 
$
2,370

The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014, aggregated by the applicable level in the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
$


$
1,714


$

 
$
1,714

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
$

 
$
2,888

 
$

 
$
2,888


Financial Instruments Reported at Fair Value - Non-Recurring
The table below presents our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2015, aggregated by the applicable level in the fair value hierarchy (in thousands). There were no assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in 2014.
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MOB (1)
 
$

 
$
547

 
$

 
$
547

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a $0.9 million impairment charge to the carrying value of an MOB. The estimated fair value as of December 31, 2015 was based upon a pending sales agreement on this MOB.

There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between levels. We will record any such transfers at the end of the reporting period in which a change of event occurs that results in a transfer. Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our interest rate swap derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with these instruments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our interest rate swap derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to their overall valuation. As a result, we have determined that our interest rate swap derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. 
Financial Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value
We consider the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, tenant and other receivables, restricted cash and escrow deposits and accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, to approximate fair value for these financial instruments because of the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. All of these financial instruments are considered Level 2.
The fair value of debt is estimated using borrowing rates available to us with similar terms and maturities, which is considered a Level 2 input. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value of the debt was $1,619.7 million compared to the carrying value of $1,590.7 million. As of December 31, 2014, the fair value of the debt was $1,447.4 million compared to the carrying value of $1,402.2 million.