pgti-def14a_20210102.htm

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

I am pleased to invite you to attend our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Meeting”), to be held on Thursday, May 20, 2021, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern time.

In light of the continuing uncertainties regarding the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic (the “Pandemic”) and the recommendations of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (the “CDC”) and other public health authorities regarding avoiding large group gatherings, and the related public health concerns, and to assist in protecting the health and well-being of the Company’s stockholders, employees and other representatives, for the second consecutive year, our Meeting will be conducted exclusively online by remote communication.

To participate in the Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PGTI2021 and enter the 16-digit control number included on your Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You may log into the Meeting platform beginning at 12:45 p.m. Eastern time on May 20, 2021.

If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform on the meeting day, please call the technical support numbers shown on the Meeting website. Technical support will be available beginning at 12:30 p.m. Eastern time on May 20, 2021 and will remain available until the Meeting has ended.

This document includes the notice of the Meeting and the proxy statement. The proxy statement is important to our corporate governance process. It describes the various proposals to be voted upon during the Meeting, solicits your vote on those proposals, provides you with information about our Board of Directors and executive officers and provides other information concerning PGT Innovations, Inc. that we believe you should be aware of when you vote your shares.

Your vote is important to us. If you hold your shares through a broker, your broker cannot vote on certain proposals without your instruction. Please use your proxy card or voter instruction form to inform us, or your broker, how you would like to vote your shares on the proposals in the proxy statement.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of PGT Innovations, Inc., I would like to express our appreciation for your ownership and continued interest in the affairs of, and support of PGT Innovations, Inc. and I hope you will choose to participate in our Meeting.

The PGT Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Meeting”) will be held on May 20, 2021, beginning at 1:00 p.m. Eastern time, for the purposes of considering and voting on the following matters:

1.To elect three directors, nominated by our Board of Directors, to serve until our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified;

2.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year;

3.To approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), on an advisory basis; and,

4.To act on any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Information relating to these items, including our Board of Director’s recommendations for how you should vote on them, is provided in the accompanying proxy statement. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 23, 2021 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote during the Meeting.

In light of the continuing uncertainties regarding the Pandemic, and the recommendations of the CDC and other public health authorities regarding avoiding large group gatherings, and to assist in protecting the health and well-being of the Company’s stockholders, employees and other representatives, for the second consecutive year, our Meeting will be conducted exclusively online by remote communication.

You may vote during the Meeting by following the instructions available on the Meeting website during the meeting. If you wish to submit a question, you may do so during the Meeting by logging into the virtual Meeting platform , typing your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and clicking “Submit.” Questions and answers will be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions will be grouped and answered at once. If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform on the meeting day, please call the technical support numbers shown on the Meeting website. Technical support will be available beginning at 12:30 p.m. Eastern time on May 20, 2021 and will remain available until the Meeting has ended.

If you were a stockholder of record on April 23, 2021, you are encouraged to vote in one of the following ways, whether or not you plan to participate in the Meeting: (1) by telephone; (2) via the Internet; or (3) by completing, signing and dating a written proxy card and returning it promptly to the address indicated on the proxy card.

The 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Meeting”) of PGT Innovations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) will be held on May 20, 2021, beginning at 1:00 p.m., Eastern time.

In light of the continuing uncertainties regarding the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic and the recommendations of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other public health authorities regarding avoiding large group gatherings, and to assist in protecting the health and well-being of the Company’s stockholders, employees and other representatives, for the second consecutive year, our Meeting will be conducted exclusively online by remote communication.

Our Board of Directors does not intend to bring any matter before the Meeting except as specifically indicated in the notice of annual meeting of stockholders and does not know of anyone else who intends to do so. If any other matters properly come before the Meeting, however, the persons named in the enclosed proxy, or their duly constituted proxy substitutes, will be authorized to vote or otherwise act thereon in accordance with their judgment on such matters. If the enclosed proxy is properly executed and returned to, and received by, the Company prior to voting at the Meeting, the shares of our common stock represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the instructions marked thereon. In the absence of instructions, the shares of our common stock will be voted “FOR” each of the three director nominees in Proposal 1, to serve until our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified, “FOR” Proposal 2, the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year, and “FOR” Proposal 3, approval of our NEO compensation, on an advisory basis. Any proxy may be revoked at any time before its exercise by notifying our Secretary, in writing, by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by participating in the Meeting and voting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 20, 2021:

The Proxy Statement for the Meeting, our Annual Report to Stockholders and our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended January 2, 2021
are available at www.proxydocs.com/PGTI.

The following questions and answers about voting during the Meeting include those relating to participation in and voting during the Meeting, which will be conducted solely online by remote communication.

This Proxy Statement provides information regarding matters to be voted on during the Meeting. Additionally, it contains certain information that the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) requires us to provide annually to our stockholders. This Proxy Statement is also used by our Board of Directors to solicit proxies to be used during the Meeting so that all stockholders of record have an opportunity to vote on the matters to be presented during the Meeting, even if they cannot virtually attend the meeting. Our Board of Directors has designated Jeffrey T. Jackson and Bradley West to vote the shares of our common stock represented by valid proxies during the Meeting.

You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record of our common stock as of the close of business on April 23, 2021, the “record date” for the Meeting. Your shares of our common stock can be voted during the Meeting only if you are present virtually or represented by a valid proxy during the Meeting.

The holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock as of the close of business on the record date must be present, either virtually or represented by valid proxy, to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the Meeting. On the record date, 60,478,373 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. Shares of our common stock represented by valid proxies received but marked as abstentions or as withholding voting authority for any or all director nominees, and shares of our common stock represented by valid proxies received but reflecting broker nonvotes, will be counted as present during the Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum.

Each share of our common stock represented during the Meeting virtually or by valid proxy is entitled to one vote for each director nominee with respect to the proposal to elect directors and one vote for each of the proposals presented at the meeting.

What vote is required to elect directors or approve or vote on each proposal, and how will my vote be counted?

Stockholders may vote “FOR”, “WITHHOLD” or “ABSTAIN” for each of the three director nominees being considered pursuant to Proposal 1. Director nominees named in Proposal 1 are elected by a plurality of the votes cast, and the director nominees who receive the greatest number of votes during the Meeting (up to the number of directors to be elected) will be elected. However, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a “Plurality Plus” voting standard with respect to the election of directors. Any director nominee who receives a greater number of “WITHHOLD” votes than “FOR” votes in an uncontested election, such as this election, is required to promptly submit an offer of resignation for consideration by the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. “ABSTAIN” votes are not counted for purposes of determining whether a director is required to submit an offer of resignation.

Shares of our common stock represented by a validly executed proxy will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of director nominees named in Proposal 1. Only votes “FOR” are counted in determining whether a plurality has been cast in favor of a director nominee. Broker non-votes are not counted as an “ABSTAIN,” “WITHHOLD” or a “FOR” vote for these purposes. Further information about our Plurality Plus voting standard is included under the heading “Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct and Ethics.”

Proposal 2-Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Stockholders may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year. The proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm will be approved by the vote of “FOR” of the holders of the majority of shares of our common stock present virtually or represented by valid proxy during the Meeting. A vote to “ABSTAIN” will count as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Stockholders may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to the approval of the compensation of our NEOs on an advisory basis. Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, approval of this proposal requires a vote “FOR” the proposal by the holders of a majority of the total number of votes of our common stock represented and entitled to vote on the proposal. Therefore, a vote to “ABSTAIN” will count as a vote “AGAINST” the approval of the compensation of our NEOs, on an advisory basis. The vote on Proposal 3 is advisory and not binding on the Company, but the Board of Directors values stockholder opinion and will consider the outcome of the vote in determining our executive compensation programs. As such, our Board of Directors seeks the opinion of our stockholders by requesting that our stockholders vote on the compensation of our NEOs, pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as disclosed in this proxy statement, which includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the supporting tabular and narrative disclosure on executive compensation.

Whether you hold shares of our common stock directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may direct your vote without participating in the Meeting. You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares of our common stock held in street name, by submitting voting instructions to your broker, bank or nominee.

Please refer to the summary instructions below and those included on your proxy card or, for shares of our common stock held in street name, the voting instruction card included by your broker, bank or nominee.

BY INTERNET OR TELEPHONE – If you hold shares of our common stock directly as the stockholder of record, you may vote by the internet or telephone or according to the instructions included on your proxy card. For shares of our common stock held in street name, you may be able to vote by the internet or telephone as permitted by your broker, bank or nominee. The availability of internet and telephone voting for beneficial owners will depend on the voting process of your broker, bank or nominee. Therefore, for shares of our common stock held through a broker, bank or nominee in street name, we recommend that you follow the voting instructions you receive by your broker, bank or nominee.

BY MAIL – If you hold shares of our common stock directly as the stockholder of record, you may vote by mail by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the accompanying enclosed, pre-addressed envelope. For shares of our common stock held in street name, you may vote by mail by completing, signing and dating the voting instruction card included by your broker, bank or nominee and mailing it in the accompanying enclosed, pre-addressed envelope. If you provide specific voting instructions, your shares of our common stock will be voted as you instruct. If the pre-addressed envelope is missing, please mail your completed proxy card to: Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York, 11717.

If you cast your vote in any of the alternatives set forth above, your shares of our common stock will be voted in accordance with your voting instructions, unless you properly revoke your proxy. If you are a stockholder of record and you complete, sign, date and return your proxy card or complete the internet or telephone voting procedures, but you do not specify how you want to vote your shares of our common stock, we will vote them “FOR” each of the three director nominees named in Proposal 1, and “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3. We do not currently anticipate that any other matters will be presented for action during the Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented for action during the meeting, the persons named on your proxy will vote your shares of our common stock on these other matters in their discretion, under the discretionary authority you have granted to them in your proxy.

If you own shares of our common stock in “street name” through a broker, bank or nominee and you do not provide instructions to your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or nominee has discretion to vote your shares of our common stock on certain “routine” matters, including the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year. However, on “non-routine” matters such as the election of directors, and the approval of our NEO compensation on an advisory basis, your broker, bank or nominee must receive voting instructions from you since it does not have discretionary voting power for these proposals. So long as the broker, bank or nominee has discretion to vote on at least one proposal, these “broker non-votes” are counted toward establishing a quorum. Therefore, it is important for you to provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or nominee.

Shares of our common stock held directly in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted during the Meeting. To vote your shares during the meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PGTI2021 and enter the 16-digit control number included on your Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You may then vote during the Meeting by following the instructions available on the aforementioned Meeting website. SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK HELD BENEFICIALLY IN STREET NAME MAY BE VOTED VIRTUALLY BY YOU DURING THE MEETING ONLY IF YOU OBTAIN A SIGNED PROXY FROM THE RECORD HOLDER GIVING YOU THE RIGHT TO VOTE THE SHARES. EVEN IF YOU CURRENTLY PLAN TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING, WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU ALSO SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS DESCRIBED BELOW SO THAT YOUR VOTE WILL BE COUNTED IF YOU LATER DECIDE NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING.

Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may change your vote at any time prior to the close of voting during the Meeting by:

If you grant a proxy, you are not prevented from participating in the Meeting and voting during the Meeting. However, your participation in during the Meeting will not by itself revoke a proxy that you have previously granted. You must vote during the Meeting to revoke your proxy.

If your shares of our common stock are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, broker or other nominee, you may revoke your proxy by following the instructions provided by your bank, broker, or other nominee.

All shares of our common stock represented by a valid proxy and not properly revoked will be voted during the Meeting.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank or nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

If your shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote online during the Meeting by following the instructions for voting on the Meeting website. We have enclosed or sent a proxy card for you to use.

If your shares of our common stock are held in a stock brokerage account or by a broker, bank or nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee, which is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote your shares of our common stock and are also invited to participate in the Meeting. However, because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares yourself during the Meeting unless you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder giving you the right to vote the shares. Your broker, bank or nominee has enclosed or provided a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank or nominee how to vote your shares of our common stock. If you do not provide the stockholder of record with voting instructions, your shares of our common stock may constitute broker non-votes. The effect of broker non-votes is more specifically described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “What vote is required to approve each proposal or elect directors, and how will my vote be counted?” above.

I am a beneficial holder. How will my shares be voted if I do not return voting instructions?

Your shares of our common stock may be voted if they are held in the name of a brokerage firm, even if you do not provide the brokerage firm with voting instructions. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), brokerage firms have the authority to vote shares on certain routine matters for which their customers do not provide voting instructions by the tenth day before the Meeting. The proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year is considered a routine matter.

The election of directors and say-on-pay advisory votes are not considered routine matters under the rules of the NYSE. If a proposal is not a routine matter and the brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from the beneficial holder of the shares of our common stock with respect to that proposal, then the brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that proposal. This is called a “broker non-vote.” In tabulating the voting result for any non-routine proposal, shares of our common stock that are subject to broker non-votes with respect to that proposal will not be considered votes either for or against the proposal, but will be counted as present for determining whether a quorum exists. Accordingly, it is very important that you provide voting instructions to your brokerage firm if you want your shares of our common stock to be voted during the Meeting on a non-routine matter.

How will a proposal or other matter that was not included in this Proxy Statement be handled for voting purposes if it is raised during the Meeting?

If any matter that is not described in this Proxy Statement should properly come before the Meeting, then Jeffrey T. Jackson and Bradley West, or any one of them, as proxies will vote the shares of our common stock represented by valid proxies in accordance with their best judgment. Such matters will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of shares of our common stock present virtually or represented by valid proxy during the Meeting, unless a greater vote is required by law, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or our Amended and Restated By-Laws (our “By-Laws”). At the time this Proxy Statement was mailed to stockholders, management was unaware of any other matters that might be presented for stockholder action during the Meeting.

Abstentions with respect to a proposal are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum. If a quorum is present, then abstentions will have the effect described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “What vote is required to approve each proposal or elect directors, and how will my vote be counted?” above.

Only stockholders, our Board of Directors, director nominees, management of the Company and management’s invited guests are permitted to participate in the Meeting, which is being conducted exclusively online by remote communication. To participate in the Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PGTI2021 and enter the 16-digit control number included on your Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You may log into the Meeting platform beginning at 12:45 p.m. Eastern Time on May 20, 2021.

We bear all expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies. We have engaged MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies for a fee estimated to be up to $7,500 for the initial solicitation services, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.

In addition to solicitation by mail and the Internet, certain officers, directors and employees of the Company may solicit proxies by telephone, email, and facsimile or in person, although no additional compensation will be paid for such solicitation. The Company may also request brokers, banks and nominees to solicit their customers who have a beneficial interest in our common stock registered in their names and will reimburse such brokers, banks and nominees for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

It means your shares of our common stock are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for all proxy and voting instruction cards you receive.

We will announce preliminary voting results during the Meeting and will publicly disclose results in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days of the date of the Meeting.

A representative of MacKenzie Partners, Inc., our proxy solicitor, will tabulate the votes, serve as the independent inspector of elections for the Meeting, and certify the final vote on all matters considered during the Meeting

How can I access the Company’s proxy materials and annual report electronically?

A copy of our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders is being mailed or otherwise made available concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote during the Meeting. A copy of our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders and this Proxy Statement are available without charge at www.proxydocs.com/PGTI.

References to our website in this Proxy Statement are not intended to function as hyperlinks, and the information contained on our website is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement. These proxy materials are also available in print to stockholders without charge and upon request, addressed to PGT Innovations, Inc., 1070 Technology Drive, North Venice, Florida 34275, Attention: General Counsel and Secretary. You are encouraged to access and review all the important information contained in the enclosed proxy materials before voting.

May I propose actions for consideration at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders?

Yes. For a stockholder to propose any matter for consideration at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, you should follow the requirements set forth in our By-Laws, as discussed in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Other Business – Stockholder Proposals or Director Nominations for the 2022 Annual Meeting.”

There are currently ten members of our Board of Directors. Pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Board of Directors is “classified,” which means it is divided into three classes of directors based on the expiration of their terms. Under this arrangement, directors are elected to terms that expire on the annual meeting date three years following the annual meeting at which they were elected, and the terms are “staggered”.

Our Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Hershberger, Mr. Sherman, and Ms. Bargabos to be elected during the Meeting to serve again as Class III directors until our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified.

Each director nominee has consented to continue to serve as a director if elected during the Meeting. Should a nominee become unavailable to accept election as a director, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote the shares of our common stock that such proxy represents for the election of such other person as our Board of Directors may nominate. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve.

With respect to its determination to nominate Mr. Sherman to serve as a director, our Board of Directors specifically considered and discussed, together with his other qualifications and attributes, his age when determining whether to nominate him to serve as a director, including the fact that his age exceeds the director age limit set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. After careful consideration of the factors discussed in more detail below , the Board determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to waive the age limit requirement with respect to Mr. Sherman, consistent with the express provisions of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, and to nominate him to serve as a Class III director. In making that determination, the Board considered, among other factors, the fact that Mr. Sherman has more than fifty years of executive-level experience in the building products industry, valuable experience that is unmatched in the Board’s view; Mr. Sherman’s near-perfect attendance of Board and Board committee meetings over the past few years, including in 2020; his active and meaningful participation in all of those meetings, the substantial guidance and mentoring he is able to provide to the Company’s executive management team and other Board members, through his service as a member of our Board of Directors; and the Board’s observation that Mr. Sherman’s age has in no way impaired, limited or restricted his ability to be a valued, participating member of the Company’s Board of Directors; and the Board’s ongoing director succession planning.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THESE
THREE CLASS III DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

Set forth below is certain information concerning each nominee for election as a director during the Meeting and each director whose current term of office will continue after the Meeting. Each of our directors brings to our Board of Directors a wealth of varied experience derived from service as executives, financial experts, subject experts and/or industry leaders. Specific factors considered by our Board of Directors in the process undertaken in searching for and recommending qualified director candidates are described below under “Governance of the Company – Assessment of Director Candidates and Required Qualifications”. The specific individual qualifications, experience, and skills of each of our directors that led to the conclusion that the individual should serve as a director of ours in light of our business and structure are described in the following paragraphs, and we believe that such qualifications, experience, and skills contribute to the Board of Directors’ effectiveness as a whole.

* Denotes director whom our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined to be independent.

Rodney Hershberger. Mr. Hershberger serves as the Company’s non-employee Chairman of the Board, effective as of January 1, 2018. He retired as our Chief Executive Officer effective December 31, 2017. Mr. Hershberger, a co-founder of the Company, has served the Company for nearly 40 years. He was named President, and appointed to our Board of Directors, in 2004, and became our Chief Executive Officer in March 2005. In 2003, Mr. Hershberger became Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and oversaw the Company’s Florida and North Carolina Operations, sales, marketing, and engineering groups. Previously, Mr. Hershberger led the manufacturing, transportation, and logistics operations in Florida, and served as Vice President of Customer Service. The Board of Directors recognizes Mr. Hershberger’s nearly 40 years of experience with the Company in the Florida market and the position of respect he has earned throughout the industry in which the Company operates through his thoughtful and honest leadership, and further recognizes his knowledge, skills, reputation and service to the community, including as the chair of the board of directors of Gulf Coast Community Foundation, a public charity serving the needs of the local Sarasota community, and as a board member of the Argus Foundation, a foundation that applies business leadership to identify, educate, advocate and collaborate on solutions for important community issues to enhance the quality of life, the environment and economic wellbeing of citizens, as driving great value to the Company and its stockholders.

Floyd F. Sherman. Mr. Sherman became a director in 2005. Mr. Sherman served as Chief Executive Officer of Builders FirstSource, Inc., a leading supplier and manufacturer of structural and related building products for residential new construction, until his retirement as CEO effective January 1, 2018. Mr. Sherman also served as a director of Builders FirstSource, Inc. during that time, and continues to do so following his retirement as CEO. Before joining Builders FirstSource, Mr. Sherman spent 28 years at Triangle Pacific/Armstrong Flooring, the last nine of which he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sherman has over 50 years of experience in the building products industry. A native of Kerhonkson, New York and a veteran of the U.S. Army, Mr. Sherman is a graduate of the New York State College of Forestry at Syracuse University. He also holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Georgia State University. The Board understands that Mr. Sherman’s 50 years of experience in the building products industry provide him with the knowledge to make significant contributions to the development of the Company’s business strategy.

Sheree L. Bargabos, Ms. Bargabos became a director in 2016. Ms. Bargabos is a seasoned executive whose career spans over 35 years at Owens Corning, a global maker of building and composite material systems, until her retirement in 2015. Prior to her most recent transition role as Vice President, Customer Experience, she spent a decade as the President of Owens Corning’s $2 billion Roofing and Asphalt division. In October 2018, Ms. Bargabos was appointed to the Board of Directors of Steel Dynamics, Inc., one of the largest domestic steel producers and metals recyclers in the United States. Ms. Bargabos earned a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from McGill University and a Master of Business Administration from Babson College. The Board of Directors recognizes Ms. Bargabos’ experience in various roles of increasing responsibility in the building materials industry, which the Board believes is an asset to the Company and its stockholders.

Xavier F. Boza, Mr. Boza became a director in 2021. Mr. Boza has served in senior human resources positions with public companies for more than twenty years, including in his current role as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Campbell Soup Company, Inc. (“Campbell”), which he joined in 2015. Mr. Boza joined Campbell as Vice President of Human Resources of its Global Biscuits and Snacks division, serving in that role from 2015 to 2017, then served as Vice President of Human Resources of Global Operations from 2017 to 2018. He was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer in 2018 and became Executive Vice President in 2019. Prior to joining Campbell, Mr. Boza was with the Kellogg Company (“Kellogg”) as Regional Vice President of Human Resources and Global Supply Chain for Kellogg Latin America from 2013 to 2015. Prior to joining Kellogg, Mr. Boza was with Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (“Kraft”) from 2009 to 2013 in various management roles in human resources with increasing levels of responsibility, from Director to Head of Human Resources, serving domestically and internationally. The Board recognizes Mr. Boza’s extensive human capital management experience, as well as his significant experience assisting with the development and implementation of new strategic plans and business models, managing corporate restructurings, identifying operating synergies and assisting executive officers with aligning management and labor structures with corporate strategies as being of great value to the Company, its stockholders, and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Alexander R. Castaldi, Mr. Castaldi became a director in 2004. Mr. Castaldi was a Managing Director of JLL Partners, Inc., which he joined in 2003, until his retirement in August 2018, and was previously a chief financial officer of three management buyouts. He was most recently Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Administration Officer of Remington Products Company. Previously, Mr. Castaldi was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Uniroyal Chemical Company. From 1990 until 1995, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Kendall International, Inc. During the 1980s, Mr. Castaldi was also Vice President, Controller of Duracell, Inc. and Uniroyal, Inc. From 2004 to February 2006, Mr. Castaldi served as a director of Builders FirstSource, Inc. The Board recognizes the vast experience at the senior executive management level which Mr. Castaldi possesses and deems it to be of great value to the Company and its stockholders.

William Morgan. Mr. Morgan became a director in 2007. Mr. Morgan is a retired partner of the accounting firm KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) where he served clients in the industrial and consumer market practices. From 2004 until 2006, he was the Chairman of KPMG’s Audit Quality Council and, from 2002 until 2006, he was a member of its Independence Disciplinary Committee. Mr. Morgan was the Lead Partner for the Chairman’s 25 Partner Leadership Development Program and continued through 2009 to provide services to KPMG as an independent consultant to its leadership development group and as Dean of the then current Chairman’s 25 Partner Leadership Development Program. He previously served as the Managing Partner of the Stamford, Connecticut office and as a member of the board of directors for KPMG LLP and KPMG Americas. Mr. Morgan is a member of the board of directors of Barnes Group, Inc. and is the Chairman of its Audit Committee and is also a member of the Executive and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Morgan was a member of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee of The J.G. Wentworth Company from 2014 until January 2018. The Board identified Mr. Morgan’s extensive experience in public accounting (39 years, 29 as a partner), where he worked closely with client management and audit committees on matters relating to accounting, auditing, control, corporate governance, and risk management, as providing significant value to the Company and its stockholders. The Board also recognizes Mr. Morgan’s significant Board and Audit Committee experience and qualifications as a “financial expert” on the Audit Committee.

Brett N. Milgrim. Mr. Milgrim became a director in 2003. Mr. Milgrim is a director of Builders FirstSource, Inc., and is the Co-Chair of the Board of Directors of Loar Group, Inc., a business specializing in the design and manufacture of aerospace components. Effective April 4, 2019, Mr. Milgrim was appointed to the Board of Directors of Horizon Global Corporation, one of the world's leading manufacturers of branded towing and trailering equipment. He was a Managing Director of JLL Partners, Inc., which he joined in 1997, until his retirement in 2011. Our Board of Directors believes that Mr. Milgrim is extremely knowledgeable regarding all aspects of corporate finance and the capital markets, and that this knowledge is important to the Company and its stockholders.

Richard D. Feintuch. Mr. Feintuch became a director in 2006. Mr. Feintuch was a partner of the law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz from 1984 until his retirement in 2004, specializing in mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance, and the representation of creditors and debtors in large restructurings. Mr. Feintuch earned a Bachelor of Science in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. from New York University School of Law. The Board believes that Mr. Feintuch’s significant knowledge, and the experience he obtained as a partner of a leading international law firm, brings not only legal skills but practical know-how into the board room, and such skills are useful in the discussion and evaluation of all corporate affairs.

Jeffrey T. Jackson. Mr. Jackson has served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since his appointment to that role effective January 1, 2018. He joined PGT Innovations in November 2005 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In 2006, Mr. Jackson helped lead the Company's IPO, and was later named Executive Vice President. In 2014, Mr. Jackson became President and Chief Operating Officer with responsibilities overseeing the Company’s strategic direction, as well as all aspects of operations. In 2016, Mr. Jackson was appointed to the Board of Directors. Prior to joining PGT Innovations, Mr. Jackson held various executive management roles. In 2004, he joined The Hershey Company as Vice President and Corporate Controller. Prior to Hershey, Mr. Jackson served in positions of increasing responsibility with Schwan’s Bakery, including Senior Vice President - General Manager of Emerging Channels, and Senior Vice President and CFO. In addition, Mr. Jackson worked for Flowers Foods, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, and KPMG. Mr. Jackson earned a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of West Georgia and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Georgia. Mr. Jackson serves on the Board of Directors for Smith Douglas Homes, a private home builder based in Atlanta, Georgia, and Children First, a nonprofit organization in Sarasota County in the State of Florida.

Frances Powell Hawes. Ms. Powell Hawes joined our Board of Directors effective on January 1, 2019. Ms. Powell Hawes has served in senior finance and accounting positions with public and private companies for more than thirty years, including as Chief Financial Officer of NCI Building Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of metal products for the construction industry, and Grant Prideco, Inc., a supplier of premium drill pipe and drill stem accessories. In addition to her extensive finance and accounting experience, Ms. Powell Hawes also has significant mergers and acquisitions experience. Ms. Powell Hawes serves on the boards of directors of two other public companies, Archrock, Inc. and Laredo Petroleum, Inc., and served on the board of Energen Corporation from 2013 until November 2018. Our Board of Directors believes that Ms. Powell Hawes’ extensive experience, including her roles in executive finance and accounting leadership, strengthens our Board of Directors’ ability to provide financial and accounting-related oversight and make other significant contributions to the Company.

The Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to the oversight of the accounting and financial reporting practices of the Company, including oversight of the integrity of our financial statements and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also reviews the adequacy of staff and management performance and procedures in connection with financial and disclosure controls, including our system to monitor and manage business risks and legal and ethical compliance programs. The Audit Committee also is charged with preparation of an audit committee report, retention and termination of our independent registered public accounting firm, annual review of the report of our independent registered public accounting firm, and discussion with our independent registered public accounting firm of the audited annual and unaudited quarterly financial statements of the Company and any audit problems or difficulties and management’s response thereto. The Audit Committee charter can be obtained without charge in the “Investors” section of our Company website at www.pgtinnovations.com in the section titled “Corporate Governance.”

The Audit Committee is comprised of three independent directors (as that term is defined by the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “NYSE Rules”) and SEC rules and regulations), Messrs. Feintuch and Morgan, and Ms. Powell Hawes. Mr. Morgan serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met six times during 2020. During several of those meetings, the Audit Committee met privately with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also met in executive session multiple times with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and with its Director of Internal Audit. Our Board of Directors has: (i) affirmatively determined that all Audit Committee members are financially literate as required by the NYSE Rules; (ii) has designated Mr. Morgan, and Ms. Powell Hawes as audit committee “financial experts” as defined by SEC rules and regulations; and (iii) determined that Messrs. Feintuch and Morgan, and Ms. Powell Hawes meet the heightened independence standards of both the NYSE Rules and SEC rules and regulations for Audit Committee members.

The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also reviews and reassesses the compensation paid to members of our Board of Directors for their service on our Board of Directors and Board committees and recommends any changes in compensation to the full Board for its approval. In addition, the Compensation Committee authorizes all equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors under our equity incentive plans. The Compensation Committee met four times in 2020, and members of the Compensation Committee participated in numerous calls and various other interactions discussing compensation issues with members of management, compensation consultants, other members of the Compensation Committee, and our Board of Directors, as well as acting through unanimous written consent. For information about our compensation program, the role of the Compensation Committee and the engagement of compensation consultants in setting executive compensation, see “Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The Compensation Committee charter can be obtained without charge in the “Investors” section of our Company website at www.pgtinnovations.com in the section titled “Corporate Governance.”

The Compensation Committee is comprised of three directors, Messrs. Castaldi, Milgrim, and Sherman, all of whom meet the heightened independence standards of both the NYSE Rules and SEC rules and regulations for Compensation Committee members. Mr. Castaldi serves as Chair of the Compensation Committee.

The Governance Committee advises our Board of Directors on corporate governance matters and, among other things, assists our Board of Directors in identifying and recommending qualified director candidates. The Governance Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to our Board of Directors on the size and composition of our Board of Directors, independence determinations with respect to continuing and prospective directors, assignments to committees of our Board of Directors and resignations of directors, when appropriate.

The Governance Committee also oversees the evaluation of our Board of Directors, the committees and individual directors. The Governance Committee met two times during 2020, and members of the Governance Committee participated in calls and various other interactions discussing governance issues with members of management, external professional advisors, other members of the Governance Committee, and our Board of Directors, as well as acting through unanimous written consent. The Governance Committee charter can be obtained without charge in the “Investors” section of our Company website at www.pgtinnovations.com in the section titled “Corporate Governance.”

The Governance Committee is comprised of three directors, Ms. Bargabos, and Messrs. Feintuch and Morgan, all of whom meet the independence standards of both the NYSE Rules and SEC rules and regulations. Mr. Feintuch serves as Chair of the Governance Committee.

A summary of the current members of each committee of our Board of Directors is identified in the table below:

For 2020, each of our directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of our Board of Directors and its committees on which he or she served. Pursuant to our Policy on Director Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which can be obtained without charge in the “Investors” section of our Company website at www.pgtinnovations.com in the section titled “Corporate Governance,” all directors are strongly encouraged to attend each of our annual meetings of stockholders in person, or, this year in light of COVID-19 related health concerns, all directors are strongly encouraged to attend virtually. Any director who is unable to attend an annual meeting of stockholders is expected to notify the Chair of our Board of Directors in advance of such meeting. All members of our Board of Directors participated in our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, which was held virtually by means of remote communication due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mr. Hershberger serves as Chair of our Board of Directors and is the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hershberger retired effective on December 31, 2017. Mr. Jackson serves as both a director and the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Our Board of Directors has not designated a lead independent director. Our Board of Directors believes that currently there are several important advantages for the Company having the position of Chair held by the retired, former Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hershberger is especially familiar with the Company’s business and industry and capable of assisting the Board in evaluating strategic priorities and discussing execution of strategy. The Company’s independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside the Company and its industry, while Mr. Hershberger and Mr. Jackson bring Company-specific experience and expertise. Our Board of Directors believes that the role of Chair being held by our recently-retired, former Chief Executive Officer facilitates information flow between management and our Board of Directors, which are essential to effective governance. Our Board of Directors additionally believes that having a director position filled by a member of the Company’s executive management, specifically the role of President and Chief Executive Officer, adds additional industry and Company-specific experience and expertise and further enhances our Board of Directors’ ability to obtain information and evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s leadership and operating strategies, and allows Mr. Jackson to serve as a bridge between management and our Board of Directors.

The Company’s senior management is responsible for day-to-day risk management, while our Board of Directors has an active role, as a whole and at the committee level, in overseeing management of the Company’s risks. Our Board of Directors regularly receives information regarding the Company’s credit, liquidity and operations from senior management. During its review of such information, our Board of Directors discusses, reviews and analyzes risks associated with each area, as well as risks associated with new business ventures and those relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and arrangements. As a result of such discussion, review and analysis, and considering input from the Compensation Committee, our Board of Directors has determined that risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company or its results. The Audit Committee oversees management of financial and compliance risks and potential conflicts of interest, and the entire Board of Directors is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks. Our Governance Committee oversees and is responsible for assessing certain risks specifically in connection with corporate governance principles and guidelines and management of risks associated with the independence of our Board of Directors.

Our Board of Directors and management team recognize that environmental responsibility by public companies is of increasing importance to investors and believe that being a responsible corporate citizen in this area helps drive shareholder value. We are committed to making a positive impact on the environment, including in the communities where our customers and employees live and work. We have undertaken steps to proactively and positively impact the environment, including programs to reduce waste and encourage recycling, reduce energy consumption, and improve the fuel efficiency of our vehicle fleet. Those steps and related accomplishments have included:

Electricity is the primary form of energy used by our production facilities. During 2020, our facilities used a total of approximately 31.4 million kilowatt hours of electricity, excluding our NewSouth Window Solutions facility, which we acquired on January 31, 2020, and our previously announced acquisition of a 75% of the outstanding equity interests of New ECO Windows Holding, LLC, which we completed on February 1, 2021.

We expect to continue our efforts to improve the energy efficiency of our operations because we believe it is good for our business and for the environment. We did not directly utilize any renewable energy sources in 2020, but we intend to explore the possibility of doing so in 2021 and future years, including through possibly entering into renewable power purchase agreements, that are accompanied by renewable energy certifications or guarantees of origin.

As part of our effort to reduce our carbon footprint, we have focused on making our fleet of delivery vehicles more fuel efficient. For example, almost all of our existing fleet of tractor-trucks, and all new trucks we purchase, utilize the injection of an aqueous urea solution diesel exhaust fluid, as an element of a selective catalytic reduction process, to help convert nitrogen oxide emissions into nitrogen gas and water vapor before being released into the environment, to reduce the amount of air pollution created. In addition, we have installed regulators or similar control mechanisms on our fleet of tractor-trucks that do not allow them to exceed a speed of sixty miles per hour, which further conserves fuel and reduces the amount of emissions they generate. We also have systems in place to monitor and correct any excessive acceleration, stopping-and-starting, or other driver behavior that decreases fuel efficiency. Finally, we are partnering with a large, internationally-known tractor-truck manufacturer to beta-test electric trucks that we may utilize in the future.

We believe our products, which have some of the best energy efficiency ratings in North America, promote energy conservation and efficiency, and thus, help decrease greenhouse gas emissions and global warming. For example, during 2019, our new, energy-efficient windows and doors were used in the replacement of older, less energy-efficient windows and doors in more than 35,000 residences. We believe that the replacement of those older windows and doors with our products will result in those homes utilizing approximately 71 million fewer kilowatt hours of electricity on an annual basis. In addition, because our products last much longer than wooden windows and doors, the use of our products helps conserve trees, reducing the number that must be cut and processed each year for use in windows and doors.

In 2020, we focused more closely on managing stormwater runoff and preventing stormwater pollution at our headquarters location. These efforts included routine visual inspections of the grounds surrounding the production facilities and production operations that could conceivably contribute to stormwater pollution, quarterly monitoring of the stormwater runoff generated for signs of pollution, and proactively maintaining the stormwater control structures on the facility grounds.

We also began researching zero-landfill disposal options for the manufacturing waste generated at our production facilities that is not currently recycled. We intend to determine the feasibility of implementing these options in 2021 with a preliminary target of reducing landfill waste by 25% by year end.

Additionally, in 2020, we transitioned a significant portion of the production lines at our headquarters location from using isopropyl alcohol to using Dawn soap for cleaning product glass. This contributed to a reduction of approximately 40% in the total volatile organic compounds emitted by our headquarters production facilities in 2020 compared with 2019.

The safety of our team members is our top priority, and we have taken significant steps in recent years to drive improvements in this area. Specifically, our Total Recordable Incident Rate -- a measurement of the number of OSHA recordable incidents per 100 full-time workers during a one-year period -- was 2.85 in 2020, an improvement of more than 61% since 2017, and had further improved to 1.67 during the first quarter of 2021. We believe these improvements in worker safety are due to the workplace safety initiatives we have taken, including:

All of our employees earn more than the federal minimum wage and we believe our hourly wages are competitive with the local communities in which our facilities operate. The average hourly wage, excluding incentive compensation, of a full-time hourly employee of the Company was approximately $16.63 as of January 2, 2021, with approximately one-half of those hourly employees earning an average hourly wage of $15.63 or more. The average total compensation, including incentive compensation and benefits, for a full-time hourly employee of our Company in 2020 was $48,260. Effective on February 28, 2021, we increased our minimum starting wage for a full-time hourly employee to $15.00 per hour at our Venice, Florida location.

We strive to help our employees maintain job stability, so they are encouraged to stay with the Company and positioned to grow their skills and knowledge on the job. The 2020 annualized voluntary turnover rate in our workforce generally was flat as compared to 2019. In an effort to reduce employee turnover, we engage in annual surveys with employees, we maintain an open-door policy that enables us to help identify any issues before they cause an employee to leave the Company, and we review exit interview data, hotline calls and root cause analysis to help deter turnover. We also assign dedicated Company human resources representatives to each department so that we can better monitor employee morale within each department. In addition, in 2018 and 2019, we made equity grants to hundreds of hourly employees, as well as to those salaried employees who do not participate in our annual long-term equity incentive plan, to further improve employee morale and retention.

PGTI respects the rights of workers of other companies who provide products and services to PGTI. We communicate our expectations to suppliers on compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws, including with respect to compensation and safety, through the terms of our written agreements and policies with our suppliers.

We believe in being an inclusive workplace for all of our employees and are committed to having a diverse workforce that is representative of the communities in which we operate and sell our products. A variety of perspectives enriches our culture, leads to innovative solutions for our business and enables us to better meet the needs of a diverse customer base and reflects the communities we serve. Our aim is to develop inclusive leaders and an inclusive culture, while also recruiting, developing, mentoring, training, and retaining a diverse workforce, including a diverse group of management-level employees. For example, we have had or currently have female executives in several of our senior leadership roles, including the positions of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Human Resources, and President of our NewSouth business. Our diversity and inclusion initiatives include:

We believe in offering career opportunities, resources, programs and tools to help employees grow and develop, as well as competitive wages and benefits to retain them. Our efforts in these areas include:

From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings relating to employment matters. During 2020, the total amount we paid to resolve proceedings alleging employment discrimination was immaterial to our earnings, and we did not make any payments to resolve allegations of wage-and-hour violations, nor did we have any such claims made against us. In our efforts to have all of our employees comply with federal and state employment-related laws, we provide non-discrimination and anti-harassment training as part of the Company’s mandatory compliance training, including for the hourly employees in our call centers, fulfillment centers and stores.

We believe the members of our Board of Directors have the diverse experience, skills and expertise, from both within and outside of our industry, to provide valuable insight and leadership to, and oversight of, our management team as it leads the Company through the opportunities and challenges facing us as a publicly traded building products company that has experienced significant growth both organically and through several acquisitions in recent years.

Our Board of Directors recognizes the importance of corporate governance practices that continually align the Company’s leadership with our stockholders. To that end, we and our Governance Committee regularly monitor “best practices” and engage with our stockholders to consider potential changes to our governance and leadership practices and structure. For example, when Mr. Hershberger retired from the Company at the end of 2017, the Board of Directors chose to separate the roles of Board Chair and President & CEO, appointing Mr. Hershberger as Board Chair, in order to capitalize on his familiarity with the Company’s business and our industry, while also having a Board Chair who is not an employee of the Company. Later in 2018, in response to feedback from our stockholder engagement efforts, the Board of Directors revised our Corporate Governance Guidelines to include a “Plurality Plus” voting standard for uncontested director elections. In addition, in response to feedback from our stockholder engagement efforts in 2020, our Board of Directors implemented: (i) stock ownership guidelines for our CEO that require the CEO to hold an aggregate amount of vested and unvested Company equity that equals six times his annual base salary; and (ii) a claw back policy, which gives the independent members of the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the authority to claw back from the Company’s executive officers all or a portion of the incentive compensation paid to the executive officers in the event the Company is required to restate its financial statements, where those officers would not have earned all or that portion of the incentive compensation paid to them, based upon the Company’s performance as measured by the restated financial statements, regardless of whether any executive officer engaged in wrongdoing or misconduct in connection with the financial statements that the Company had to restate. We will continue to monitor and evaluate developments in corporate governance going forward, to determine which approaches and practices are in the best interest of the Company.

The Company’s common stock trades on the NYSE and, accordingly, we are subject to the NYSE Rules.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that at least a majority of our Board of Directors be independent, consistent with the NYSE Rules. Our Board of Directors applies standards in affirmatively determining whether a director is “independent,” in compliance with the NYSE Rules and SEC rules and regulations. Our Board of Directors, in applying the above-referenced standards, has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Boza, Castaldi, Feintuch, Milgrim, Morgan, and Sherman, Ms. Bargabos, and Ms. Powell Hawes are “independent” directors. As part of our Board of Directors’ process in making such determination, it also determined that each such director has no other “material relationship” with the Company that could interfere with his or her ability to exercise independent judgment.

Our Board of Directors includes one management director, Mr. Jackson, who serves as both a director and the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Jackson is not independent under the NYSE Rules and SEC rules and regulations. In addition, our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Hershberger, who served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer until his retirement, effective December 31, 2017, and who continued to serve as a paid consultant to the Company until the end of 2020, is not independent under such rules.

As part of its annual evaluation of director independence, our Board of Directors examined (among other things) whether any transactions or relationships exist currently (or existed during the past three years) between each director and the Company, its subsidiaries, affiliates, equity investors, or independent auditors and the nature of those relationships under the NYSE Rules and SEC rules and regulations. No transactions, relationships or arrangements, other than those described under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” were presented to, or considered by, our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors also examined whether there are (or have been within the past year) any transactions or relationships between each director and any executive officer of the Company or its affiliates. As a result of this evaluation, our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that each independent director named above is independent under those criteria. Independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions outside the presence of other directors and management representatives. Interested parties, including stockholders, may communicate with the Chair of our Board of Directors or the independent directors as a group by sending a communication, addressed to PGT Innovations, Inc., 1070 Technology Drive, North Venice, Florida 34275, Attention: General Counsel and Secretary.

In accordance with the NYSE Rules, our Board of Directors typically holds an executive session of non-management and independent directors as a part of every regularly scheduled meeting of our Board of Directors. These executive sessions are chaired by a member of our independent directors.

Upon the advice and recommendation of our Governance Committee and in accordance with the NYSE Rules, our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Guidelines address an array of governance issues and principles, including director qualifications and responsibilities, annual performance evaluations of our Board of Directors and meetings of independent directors.

In response to feedback from our shareholder engagement efforts, the Board of Directors revised the Corporate Governance Guidelines in 2018 to include a “Plurality Plus” voting standard for uncontested director elections. Under our Plurality Plus voting standard, any director nominee who receives a greater number of “WITHHOLD” votes than “FOR” votes in an uncontested election is required to tender his or her resignation promptly after certification of the election results for consideration by the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. Broker non-votes, if any, are not counted as either a “WITHHOLD” or a “FOR” vote for these purposes. The Governance Committee will consider the resignation offer, considering all facts and circumstances it deems relevant, and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept or reject the resignation offer, or whether other action should be taken. The Board of Directors will consider the recommendation of the Governance Committee and will determine whether to accept the resignation offer within ninety days of certification of the election results. Full details of this policy are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available in the “Investors” section of our Company website at www.pgtinnovations.com in the section titled “Corporate Governance.

We maintain a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”) applicable to all directors, officers and employees that complies with the NYSE Rules, as well as a Policy on Insider Trading. Our employees are also subject to additional specific policies, guidelines and Company rules governing certain types of conduct or situations. On an annual basis, each director and officer of the Company is required to provide an acknowledgment that he or she has received and reviewed our Code of Ethics and to disclose any related person transactions. In addition, all employees of the Company (including all officers) are required to undergo an annual ethics training program.

Violations of our Code of Ethics by senior financial officers must be reported to the Audit Committee. A copy of the Code of Ethics can be obtained without charge in the “Investors” section of our Company website at www.pgtinnovations.com in the section titled “Corporate Governance,” or by written request to the Company at the address appearing on the first page of this Proxy Statement to the attention of our Secretary. There have been no waivers of the Code of Ethics, and we are not aware of any violations of the Code of Ethics.

Our employees are encouraged to anonymously report any suspected violations of laws, regulations, or the Code of Ethics and/or any suspected unethical business practices via our continuously monitored hotline.

Our Governance Committee is responsible for considering and recommending to our Board of Directors nominees for election as director at our annual meeting of stockholders and nominees to fill any vacancy on our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors, after taking account of the assessment provided by our Governance Committee, is responsible for considering and recommending to our stockholders, nominees for election as director at our annual meeting of stockholders. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, both our Governance Committee and our Board of Directors, in evaluating director candidates, consider the experience, talents, skills and other characteristics of each candidate and our Board of Directors as a whole, in assessing potential nominees to serve as director.

Our Board of Directors believes that the minimum qualifications for serving as a director of the Company are that a nominee have high moral character and personal integrity, a record and reputation for honest, ethical conduct, demonstrated accomplishment in his or her field, the ability to devote sufficient time to carry out the duties of a director, and be at least 21 years of age. Also, a nominee should demonstrate the ability and judgment to work effectively with other members of our Board of Directors to serve the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. In addition to these minimum qualifications, our Governance Committee and our Board of Directors may consider all other information relevant in their business judgment to the decision of whether to nominate a candidate for a director seat considering the then-current composition of our Board of Directors.

These factors may include a candidate’s experience, judgment and skills, such as an understanding of: (i) the building products industry and markets; (ii) public company management; (iii) manufacturing and distribution; (iv) industry-relevant technologies; (v) executive compensation and human resources matters; and (vi) accounting and financial management expertise. In addition, diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, and age, are factors our Board of Directors may consider in evaluating candidates for membership to our Board of Directors.

Our Governance Committee will identify potential nominees by asking current directors and executive officers to notify the Board if they become aware of persons meeting the criterion described above or by engaging a firm or firms that specialize in identifying director candidates. The Governance Committee also will consider candidates recommended by stockholders as described below.

Our Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders. Any stockholder wishing to nominate a candidate for director at the next annual meeting of stockholders must submit a proposal as described under “Other Business – Stockholder Proposals or Director Nominations for the 2022 Annual Meeting” and otherwise comply with the advance notice provisions and information requirements contained in our By-Laws. The stockholder submission should be sent to our Secretary, at 1070 Technology Drive, North Venice, Florida 34275.

Stockholder nominees are evaluated under the same standards as other candidates for membership to our Board of Directors described above in “Assessment of Director Candidates and Required Qualifications.” In addition, in evaluating stockholder nominees for possible inclusion with our Board of Director’s slate of nominees, our Governance Committee and our Board of Directors may consider any other information they deem relevant, including (i) the factors described above in “Assessment of Director Candidates and Required Qualifications,” (ii) whether there are or will be any vacancies on our Board of Directors, (iii) the size of the nominating stockholder’s holdings in the Company, (iv) the length of time such stockholder has owned such holdings and (v) any statements by the stockholder nominee or the shareholder regarding proposed changes in our operations.

The biographical information regarding each member of our Board of Directors under the caption “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” and each of our executive officers under the caption “Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Management” is incorporated by reference herein.

The Audit Committee conducted an evaluation and competitive process to determine the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s 2021 fiscal year ended January 1, 2022. The committee invited several independent registered public accounting firms to participate in this process, including KPMG LLP, which audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 2, 2021 and has audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements since 2014. After reviewing proposals from the independent registered public accounting firms that participated in the process, the Audit Committee made the decision to engage Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements for our 2021 fiscal year ending January 1, 2022.

EY was appointed as our independent registered public accounting firm effective on March 2, 2021, upon our filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021. Prior to the appointment of KPMG LLP as auditor of the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning with our 2014 fiscal year, EY was our independent registered public accounting firm.

We are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm, because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm and view the ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of votes cast by the holders of shares of our common stock. If stockholders fail to ratify the selection of EY as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2021, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain that firm. Even if EY’s appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company.

A representative of EY will be present during the Meeting, not to make a statement, but to be available to answer appropriate questions.

The Audit Committee approves the annual audit fee of the Company’s independent auditors. The Audit Committee also establishes pre-approved limits for which the Company’s management may engage the Company’s independent auditors for specific services. Any work which exceeds these pre-approved limits requires the advance approval of the Audit Committee. Each quarter, the Audit Committee reviews all work done by the independent auditors during the previous quarter. All fees paid to KPMG LLP for fiscal year 2020 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking stockholders to vote, on an advisory basis, to approve the executive compensation as reported in this proxy statement. This proposal is advisory in nature and, therefore, is not binding upon our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee will, as it has done in the past, carefully evaluate the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

We believe that our compensation components provide a reasonable balance of base compensation, cash incentive compensation, long-term equity-based incentive compensation, and other benefits and perquisites that is closely aligned with each executive officer’s individual performance and the Company’s overall performance. The Company aims to provide executive officers with a reasonable level of security through base salary and benefits, while rewarding them through cash and equity-based incentive compensation to achieve business objectives and create stockholder value. We believe that each of our compensation components is integral to attracting, retaining and rewarding qualified NEOs, and fostering operating performance.

Stockholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, which discusses how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy, and which contains tables and a narrative discussion about specific compensation of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that these policies and procedures are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving its goals.

We value the feedback provided by our stockholders and seek their input as part of our regular stockholder outreach efforts. At the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 94% of votes cast supported our executive compensation program. We would like to sustain the stockholder support for our executive compensation program and will continue to engage in regular discussions with our stockholders regarding their views on executive compensation matters. We will continue to consider stockholder feedback, input from our independent compensation consultant and the outcomes of future “say-on-pay” votes when assessing our executive compensation programs and policies, and when making compensation decisions for our NEOs. The stockholder vote to approve, on an advisory basis, a Say-on-Pay proposal currently occurs annually, and the next such vote will occur at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 23, 2021, unless otherwise noted, for (a) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock, (b) each of our current and incumbent directors named above, (c) each of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (d) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

The percentages of voting shares provided in the table are based on 60,478,373 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of April 23, 2021. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and regulations and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting and investment power, or shares voting and investment power with his or her spouse, with respect to all shares of our common stock listed as owned by that person. The number of shares shown does not include the interest of certain persons in shares held by a family member in their own right. Shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within sixty days of April 23, 2021 are considered outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock held by the individual, but not for the purpose of calculating the percentage of outstanding shares held by any other individual.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned			Percentage of Voting Shares
Beneficial Owners of More Than 5%:
BlackRock, Inc.		9,192,447	(2)	15.2%
Wellington Management Group LLP		4,293,343	(3)	7.1%
The Vanguard Group		3,567,055	(4)	5.9%
Cooke & Bieler LP		3,551,496	(5)	5.9%
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.		3,402,008	(6)	5.6%


Non-Employee Directors and Nominees:
Rodney Hershberger		1,382,134		2.3%
Sheree L. Bargabos		25,992		*
Alexander R. Castaldi		138,576		*
Richard D. Feintuch		110,720		*
Frances Powell Hawes		11,640		*
Brett N. Milgrim		63,727		*
William J. Morgan		50,065		*
Floyd F. Sherman		96,794		*
Xavier F. Boza		660		*

Named Executive Officers:
Jeffrey T. Jackson		507,325		*
Robert A. Keller		58,011		*
Mike Wothe		27,136		*
Brent Boydston		35,517	(7)	*
Sherri Baker		7,153		*

Directors and executive officers as a group		2,515,450	(8)	4.2%

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each person is PGT Innovations, Inc., 1070 Technology Drive, North Venice, Florida, 34275.

(2) The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G filed on January 25, 2021, with the SEC, in which BlackRock, Inc. reported that at December 31, 2020, it had sole voting power over 9,090,695 shares and sole dispositive power over 9,192,447 shares. The principal business address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.

(3) The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 4, 2021, with the SEC, in which Wellington Management Group LLP reported that at December 31, 2020, it had shared voting power over 3,718,253 shares and shared dispositive power over 4,293,343 shares. The principal business address of Wellington Management Group LLP is c/o Wellington Management Company LLP, 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.

(4) The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 3) filed on February 10, 2021, with the SEC, in which The Vanguard Group reported that at December 31, 2020, it had shared voting power over 86,902 shares, sole dispositive power over 3,430,163 shares, and shared dispositive power over 136,892 shares. The principal business address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

(5) The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 1) filed on February 16, 2021, with the SEC, in which Cooke & Bieler LP reported that at December 31, 2020, it had shared voting power over 2,799,396 shares and shared dispositive power over 3,551,496 shares. The principal business address of Cooke & Bieler LP is 2001 Market Street, Suite 4000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

(6) The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 3) filed on February 16, 2021, with the SEC, in which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reported that at December 31, 2020, it had sole voting power over 757,507 shares and sole dispositive power over 3,402,008 shares. The principal business address of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

We know of no arrangements, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in the change in control of the Company.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires our executive officers, directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities. Executive officers, directors, and beneficial owners of greater than 10% of our equity securities are required by SEC rules and regulations to provide us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. Based solely on review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and directors that no other reports were required, we believe that through January 2, 2021, all of our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them.

The purpose of this section is to provide information about the compensation objectives and policies for our named executive officers (the “NEOs”) and to explain how the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors made its compensation decisions for 2020.

Our NEOs for 2020, including the titles they held at the end of 2020, are listed below, and consisted of: (i) our President and Chief Executive Officer; (ii) our President - Southeast Business Unit; (iii) our President - Western Business Unit; (iv) our Senior Vice President - Corporate Sales and Innovation; (v) our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, who voluntarily terminated her employment with the Company effective February 7, 2021.

Jeffrey T. Jackson, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Jackson has served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since his appointment to that role effective January 1, 2018. He joined PGT Innovations in November 2005 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In 2006, Mr. Jackson helped lead the Company's initial public offering, and was later named Executive Vice President. In 2014, Mr. Jackson became President and Chief Operating Officer with responsibilities overseeing the Company’s strategic direction, as well as all aspects of operations. In 2016, Mr. Jackson was appointed to the Board of Directors. Prior to joining PGT Innovations, Mr. Jackson held various executive management roles. In 2004, he joined The Hershey Company as Vice President and Corporate Controller. Prior to Hershey, Mr. Jackson served in positions of increasing responsibility with Schwan’s Bakery, including Senior Vice President - General Manager of Emerging Channels, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In addition, Mr. Jackson worked for Flowers Foods, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, and KPMG. Mr. Jackson earned a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of West Georgia and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Georgia. Mr. Jackson serves on the Board of Directors for Smith Douglas Homes, a private home builder based in Atlanta, Georgia, and Children First, a nonprofit organization in Sarasota County in the State of Florida.

Robert A. Keller, President of Southeast Business Unit. Mr. Keller has served as the Company’s President, Southeast Business Unit (“SEBU”), since his appointment to that position, effective January 1, 2019. In that position, he is responsible for managing all aspects of manufacturing and other operations of the Company’s PGT Custom Windows and Doors, CGI Windows and Doors, CGI Commercial, and WinDoor divisions, and, since its acquisition by the Company effective on January 31, 2020, the NewSouth Window Solutions (“NewSouth”) division. Mr. Keller is also responsible for managing the overall sales, marketing, customer care, and field service functions, with respect to all the Company’s product lines, for those subsidiaries in a business region that includes seven states in the Southeastern United States and the Caribbean. His responsibilities also include providing strategic leadership for SEBU by working with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive leadership to establish long-range goals, strategies, plans and policies. Mr. Keller served as Senior Vice President, Operations from January 1, 2018 until December 31, 2018. He was hired as Vice President and General Manager of PGT Custom Windows and Doors in May 2016 and served in that role until his promotion to Senior Vice President, Operations. Mr. Keller has more than two decades of experience in the building products industry, including serving as Vice President of Global Operations for Moen, a manufacturer of faucets, fixtures and other accessories for bathrooms, starting in 2015. Prior to that, he held several positions of increasing responsibility with Therma-Tru Doors, from 2002 through 2014, including Vice President of Manufacturing and Senior Vice President of Operations. Mr. Keller earned a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the Ohio State University and a Master of Business Administration from Regis University.

Mike Wothe, President of Western Business Unit. Mr. Wothe joined the Company in December 2019 as President of the Western Business Unit (“WEBU”) and Senior Vice President of PGT Innovations, Inc. In this role, Mr. Wothe is responsible for all aspects of WEBU’s business, including strategy, sales and marketing, operations, and results of operations. Mr. Wothe brings decades of operations and industry experience, as well as a strong understanding of customer relations. Prior to joining the Company as President of WEBU, Mr. Wothe was President at Cardinal LG Company, a leader in residential glass for windows and doors in the United States. Mr. Wothe holds a Bachelor of Science in chemical engineering from the University of Washington.

Brent Boydston, Senior Vice President of Corporate Sales and Innovation. Mr. Boydston joined the Company as Vice President of Sales in 2016 and has over 25 years of sales experience. He was appointed Senior Vice President of Corporate Sales and Innovation effective January 1, 2018. In that role, he is responsible for all aspects of sales strategy and management for Company brands, including PGT Custom Windows & Doors, CGI Windows and Doors, WinDoor and Western Window Systems. Mr. Boydston was promoted to Senior Vice President of Corporate Sales and Innovation effective January 2020. Prior to joining the Company, he was Vice President of Sales for Liberty Hardware Manufacturing Corporation, a manufacturer of decorative and functional residential hardware and accessories sold in home centers, retailers and distributor channels across the United States. Mr. Boydston began working for Liberty Hardware Manufacturing Corporation in 2011. Mr. Boydston earned a Bachelor of Business Administration from Baylor University and a Master of Business Administration, Economics and Management from Wake Forest University.

Sherri Baker, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Baker was appointed to the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, effective April 8, 2019. Prior to joining PGT Innovations, Ms. Baker served as Vice President, Commercial Finance for Dean Foods Company, a food and beverage company that is the largest dairy company in the United States, from October 2018. Prior to that role, Ms. Baker was Vice President of Investor Relations, Strategy and Corporate Finance for Dean Foods, beginning in January 2016. From January 2013 through December 2015, she served as Vice President of Finance, Logistics for Dean Foods. Prior to Dean Foods, Ms. Baker spent 13 years at Frito-Lay, a subsidiary of PepsiCo, in a succession of finance and accounting roles. Ms. Baker holds a Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Accounting from the University of North Texas.

On January 8, 2021, Ms. Baker notified the Company that she would be resigning from the Company effective at the close of business on February 7, 2021. The Company’s Board of Directors appointed Bradley West, the Company's former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, who has been serving as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and Treasurer since Ms. Baker joined the Company as its Chief Financial Officer, as Interim Chief Financial Officer and principal financial officer, effective February 8, 2021.

Our goal in establishing the executive compensation structure is to attract, retain and reward key leaders who drive both near-term and long-term value for our stockholders. Our compensation structure is designed to reward leadership skills, operating performance and financial accomplishments. We also believe that successful compensation programs for executive officers and other key employees, including the NEOs, must further the following primary objectives, which are to:

All compensation policies and decisions are designed to reward employees, including the NEOs, who demonstrate the capacity to make significant contributions to our operational, financial and competitive performance, thereby furthering the first primary objective referred to above. Key factors that may increase or decrease compensation include:

At our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 94% of the votes were cast in favor of the advisory resolution on our executive compensation. We believe that vote outcome indicates stockholder confidence in our compensation programs. At the Meeting, the Company is again holding a non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation. The Compensation Committee will consider the results of the advisory votes on executive compensation when making future decisions regarding the structure and implementation of our executive compensation program.

Compensation Committee - The Compensation Committee’s primary responsibilities include: (1) establishing, in consultation with our President and Chief Executive Officer (the “Chief Executive Officer”), the Company’s general compensation and incentive philosophy; (2) establishing, reviewing and recommending approval of each executive officer’s annual compensation, and evaluating each executive officer’s performance in light of the goals and objectives of the Company’s executive compensation plans; (3) evaluating the appropriate level of compensation for board and committee service by non-employee members of our Board of Directors; (4) reviewing incentive compensation programs to ensure unnecessary risk is not encouraged; and (5) overseeing the annual cash incentive plan, the long-term equity incentive plan, and any other equity-based awards.

Management - In collaboration with the Compensation Committee and considering information provided by the compensation consultant, our Chief Executive Officer coordinates the review of the compensation programs for senior management, including the NEOs. Such review includes an evaluation of individual and Company performance, competitive practices and trends, and various compensation issues. Based on the outcomes of this review, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of each of the NEOs, other than the Chief Executive Officer.

Compensation Consultant - In 2018, in connection with Mr. Jackson’s appointment as our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee engaged Mercer, a well-known compensation consultant, to assist the Compensation Committee in evaluating, designing and structuring executive compensation programs for Mr. Jackson and all of his direct reports, and in updating the peer group utilized by the Compensation Committee for evaluating the Company’s executive compensation programs starting in 2018. Although Mercer provides certain other services to the Company related to the Company’s medical and 401(k) plans, the Compensation Committee confirmed Mercer’s ability to provide independent advice to the committee under NYSE Rules and SEC rules and regulations.

Compensation to our NEOs is intended to be competitive with that of similar companies. As part of our assessment, we look to the compensation paid to individuals with similar responsibilities at peer companies. Because peer selection is somewhat difficult due to the lack of publicly-traded companies with which we compete and the lack of available data for privately-held competitors, we also consider compensation levels within our relevant labor market to ensure that our compensation arrangements are in line with companies of our size. In addition, the Compensation Committee may consider the nature and amount of compensation paid to executives at other building products companies, including companies larger than the Company, where the Compensation Committee believes the Company competes with those other companies for executive talent.

Based on our assessment, we believe our 2020 total direct annual compensation to senior management (including our NEOs), comprised of total cash compensation and the annualized expected value of long-term incentive awards is generally at or below the median level of total direct compensation for our peer group.

However, for purposes of determining appropriate levels of certain aspects of executive compensation for our NEOs, we have also compared base salaries, annual bonus targets and longer-term incentive targets against the median levels of such compensation elements at a selected peer group of similarly situated companies. Our Compensation Committee approved an updated peer group in December 2017, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, Mercer, taking into consideration factors such as industry, revenue size, competition for talent, investor comparisons and market capitalization. Following are the companies included in our peer group used for evaluating our 2020 executive compensation program:

When evaluating and setting the 2020 executive compensation relative to our performance, the Compensation Committee took account of the individual performance of each executive officer and the Company for 2019, the economic environment in which we were operating, the state of the housing market, unemployment rates both nationally and in the Company’s core markets, the national credit landscape, sensitivity regarding executive pay, and other factors the Compensation Committee deemed relevant. We believe our programs have a balanced approach and properly reflect our views that our compensation programs should align executive officers’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, through designs that emphasize pay-for-performance, while also attracting and retaining talented executive management.

The following items summarize the essential elements used as compensation tools to reward and retain our NEOs during fiscal 2020:

The following table shows the mix of compensation at target levels for 2020 for our NEOs:

Our Compensation Committee sets the annual base salary and annual cash bonus of our Chief Executive Officer. In determining his annual compensation, our Compensation Committee considers the highly competitive industry in which we operate and the unique experience he brings to the position as well as his contributions to our long-term performance.

For our other NEOs, our Chief Executive Officer provides our Compensation Committee with recommendations regarding compensation. Our Compensation Committee reviews such recommendations and approves annual compensation for NEOs, consisting of annual base salary, annual cash bonus and annual equity grant (discussed below). Our Compensation Committee may request additional information and analysis and ultimately determines in its discretion, based on its own analysis and judgment and the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer, whether to approve any recommended changes in compensation for our other NEOs. For example, in 2019, when considering the appropriate annual compensation for our NEOs for 2020, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed a presentation from Mercer, its independent compensation consultant at that time, regarding the mix and amount of compensation paid to executive officers at companies within the above-referenced peer group, who perform responsibilities similar to those performed by our NEOs, as well as other information provided by the compensation consultant. In 2020, our Compensation Committee engaged Aon Rewards Solutions as its independent compensation consultant.

Our goal is to pay each NEO a base salary sufficient to remain competitive in the market. The annualized base salaries for each of our NEOs, as of December 28, 2019, which is referred to as the “2019 Annual Base Salary Rate” in the table set forth below, and January 2, 2021, which is referred to as the “2020 Annual Base Salary Rate” in the table set forth below are as follows:

For Messrs. Jackson, Keller, and Boydston, annualized base salaries at January 2, 2021 reflect raises to $772,500 for Mr. Jackson, $360,500 for Mr. Keller, $309,000 for Mr. Boydston, and $360,500 for Ms. Baker, each of which became effective on February 16, 2020, and each of which represents a three percent increase as compared to the 2019 annual base salary rate for each of those NEOs. That percentage increase was generally in line with the percentage increase in base salaries received by most of the Company’s non-executive salaried employees. The increases in the base salaries for Messrs. Jackson, Keller and Boydston, and for Ms. Baker, were made after the Compensation Committee reviewed information about the base salaries of similar executives within the peer group, with the objective of bringing the base salaries of Messrs. Jackson, Keller and Boydston closer to, or to, the median base salaries for their positions, and also in recognition of their personal performance during 2019, and the Company’s overall financial performance for 2019. All NEOs’ base salaries for 2020 were approved by the Compensation Committee and, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, by the independent members of our Board of Directors. Mr. Wothe’s annualized base salary of $350,000 for 2020 was the same amount as his initial salary effective with his appointment as the Company’s President of WEBU, effective as of December 2, 2019.

In order to provide incentives for future annual performance, we believe that a substantial portion of each NEO’s total potential compensation should be in the form of an annual cash bonus, the amount of which should be based upon both individual and Company performance. Accordingly, our policy is to allocate an amount equal to a target range of 60% to 100% of a NEO’s annual base salary to performance-based cash bonus awards. The target percentage of each NEO’s annual base salary is determined by considering, for example, the level and nature of responsibilities given to that NEO and the NEO’s job performance in the prior year, as well as the total annual cash compensation, including cash incentives, paid to individuals with similar responsibilities at peer companies.

Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the independent members of our Board of Directors established annual cash bonus targets as a percentage of salary under the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan (“2020 AIP”) for each NEO. As a percentage of annual base salary, these targets were 100% for Mr. Jackson, 60% for Mr. Keller, 60% for Mr. Wothe, 60% for Mr. Boydston, and 65% for Ms. Baker. The financial performance component of the 2020 AIP for each NEO was the achievement of a specified amount of EBITDA in 2020 for either the Company, or for one or more of the Company’s business units. In addition, the Compensation Committee reserved the discretion to adjust upward, subject to the approval of the independent members of our Board of Directors, the amount of payments ultimately made to the NEOs under the 2020 AIP, if the Compensation Committee believed such an adjustment was appropriate in order to incentivize individual achievement by NEOs, or to pay competitive compensation for the purpose of retaining key personnel, even if the Company’s or its business units’ EBITDA results did not meet expectations, including, for example, where the financial results were impacted by weather, economic, market or other events or trends beyond the NEOs’ control. This discretion is intended to provide the Compensation Committee with a mechanism to address retention objectives and to reward individual achievement. The discretionary aspect of the 2020 AIP is not expressed as a formal component of the 2020 AIP with a specified target percentage, but the discretionary aspect of the 2020 AIP remained subject to an EBITDA-related limit or “cap.” Specifically, if the Company or an individual business unit to which a NEO’s AIP payment is tied failed to achieve the target amount of EBITDA set

forth in the 2020 AIP, the maximum discretionary AIP payment that the Board could have approved for the portion of that NEO’s AIP payment that was tied to that sub-target EBITDA metric was capped at 100% of the target 2020 AIP payment allocable to that particular EBITDA metric for that NEO.

For 2020, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors determined it was in the best interest of the Company to increase the AIP payout percentage relating to WEBU to 100% of target performance, from what would have been a payout percentage of 84.9% of target, under the terms of the 2020 AIP for WEBU. This action was taken to recognize the significant improvements in operational efficiencies achieved by WEBU’s management team during 2020, in the face of the unprecedented challenges presented to WEBU by the COVID-19 pandemic, and to encourage the retention of those senior managers.

The result of this action by the Compensation Committee, and the other independent members of the Board, was to increase Mr. Wothe’s payment under the 2020 AIP to 100% of his target, from what would have been 84.9% of his target. Also, because his responsibility level was deemed to be 75% relating to SEBU, and 25% relating to WEBU, increase Mr. Boydston’s payment under the 2020 AIP to 110.5% of his target, from what would have been 106.7% of his target. The Committee also considered the individual performance of each of these executives during 2020, including their contributions to leading the Western Windows Systems business after several senior management departures in early 2020.

The table below provides a summary of the Company’s performance results under the 2020 AIP comparing minimum, target and 133% performance levels to actual performance results (dollars in millions):

(1) EBITDA represents EBIT for 2020, plus depreciation and amortization, calculated using operating results pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"), as adjusted by management for certain costs, with approval by the Board of Directors.

(2) A performance rating of below 80% of target does not meet the minimum performance measure and, therefore, results in a zero-payout percentage. Payout percentages for performance ratings between the minimum of 80% and target of 100%, and target of 100% and the 133% level of performance are non-linear, as described below. Payout percentages may be rounded to the nearest whole percent.

For performance ratings between the minimum of 80% and target of 100%, the payout percentage begins at 50% for the minimum performance rating of 80%, and increases by 5% in payout percentage for every 1% of performance rating up to 85%, then increases by 3% in payout percentage for every 1% percent of performance rating up to 90%, then increases by 1% in payout percentage for every 1% of performance rating up to the 100% target performance and 100% payout percentage of target.

For performance ratings between the target of 100% and the 133% level of performance, the payout percentage begins at 100% and increases by 2% in payout percentage for every 1% of performance rating up to 120%, then increases by 4.6% in payout percentage for every 1% of performance rating up to 133%. Performance ratings above 133% increase the payout percentage by 3% for every 1% of performance rating, with no upper limit.

(3) For WEBU, the Compensation Committee and other independent members of the Board exercised their discretion to increase WEBU's payout percentage to 100% which, based on an 88.3% performance rating would otherwise have been 84.9% under the above described terms in note (2) for payout percentages under the 2020 AIP.

(1) The metric for measuring performance under the 2020 AIP for Mr. Jackson was based on EBITDA derived from the consolidated performance of PGT Innovations, Inc.

(2) The metric for measuring performance under the 2020 AIP for Mr. Keller was based on EBITDA derived from SEBU, the business unit for which he had responsibility.

(3) The metric for measuring performance under the 2020 AIP for Mr. Wothe was based on EBITDA derived from WEBU, the business unit for which he had responsibility, which would have resulted in a payout percentage of 84.9% of target based on WEBU's performance for 2020. However, the Compensation Committee and other independent members of the Board exercised their discretion to increase WEBU's AIP payout percentage to 100% of target for 2020, in recognition of the significant improvements in operational efficiencies achieved by WEBU’s management team during 2020, in the face of unprecedented challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, and to encourage the retention of WEBU’s senior managers.

(4) The metric for measuring performance under the 2020 AIP for Mr. Boydston was based on EBITDA derived from both SEBU and WEBU. 75% of Mr. Boydston’s 2020 AIP payout was tied to SEBU’s EBITDA performance, and 25% of his 2020 AIP payout was tied to WEBU’s EBITDA performance. The 2020 AIP payout level for SEBU was 114% of target, and the payout level for WEBU was 100% of target.

(5) Because Ms. Baker was no longer employed by the Company on the date that 2020 AIP payments were made, Ms. Baker did not receive any amounts under the 2020 AIP.

We believe the best way to align the interests of our senior leaders, including each of the NEOs, with those of our stockholders is for those leaders to own a meaningful amount of our common stock. Our Compensation Committee approved a long-term incentive plan for 2020 (“2020 LTIP”), and on February 14, 2020, we granted equity-based awards to senior leaders, including each of our NEOs, pursuant to the 2020 LTIP.

Upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the independent members of our Board of Directors established long-term incentive compensation targets for 2020 as a percentage of annual base salary under the 2020 LTIP for each NEO. As a percentage of annual base salary, these targets were 215% for Mr. Jackson, 80% for Mr. Keller, 65% for Mr. Wothe, 65% for Mr. Boydston, and 65% for Ms. Baker. The 2020 LTIP awards were comprised fully of restricted stock, half of which was a fixed quantity of solely time-based restricted stock that vests in three equal amounts on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, and the other half of which was performance restricted stock subject to a graded awarding of shares based on the percentage of the target amount of the Company’s consolidated earnings before interest and taxes, as defined in our 2020 business plan (“EBIT”) achieved, and which also contains a time-based vesting component. With respect to the performance shares, the percentages of the target amount of EBIT at which these performance shares would be earned ranged from 80% to greater than 120%, and the number of shares that could be earned ranged from none to 150% of the target number of performance shares granted. If less than 80% of the target amount of EBIT was achieved, then none of the shares of performance-restricted stock would be earned. If 120% or more of the target amount of EBIT was achieved, then 150% of the target number of performance shares granted would be earned. Any performance shares earned would vest in two equal installments

on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The grant date fair value of the 2020 LTIP on February 14, 2020 was $16.56 per share, representing the prior day’s closing share price of our common stock as traded on the NYSE.

The following table sets forth the 2020 LTIP amounts by NEO in grant date fair value and the target number of shares granted for both the fixed and performance portions of the award:

The following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum performance levels and related grant date fair values and number of shares that could have been earned under the 2020 LTIP, by each NEO, with respect to the portion of the 2020 LTIP grants that were performance-based:

(1) For every 1% above threshold performance, up to maximum performance of 120% of target performance, the number of shares earned increase by 2.5%, from threshold awarded shares of 50% of the target number of shares, up to a maximum award of 150% of the target number of shares. If actual performance is less than 80% of target performance, no shares are awarded. If actual performance is more than 120% of target performance, shares awarded are capped at 150% of the target number of shares.

The table below provides a summary of the Company’s performance results with respect to the portion of the 2020 LTIP grants that were performance-based, comparing threshold, target and maximum performance to actual performance results (dollars in millions):

(1) Represents EBIT for 2020, calculated using operating results pursuant to U.S. GAAP, as adjusted by management for certain costs, with approval by the Board of Directors.

(2) For every 1% that actual performance exceeds the threshold performance of 80%, up to maximum performance of 120% of the target performance of 100%, the number of awarded shares increases by 2.5%, from threshold awarded shares of 50%, up to maximum awarded shares of 150% of the target awarded shares of 100%. If the actual performance falls below the threshold performance of 80%, no shares are awarded. If actual performance is more than 120% of target performance, shares awarded are capped at 150% of the target number of shares.

Actual performance for 2020 was between the threshold and target performance at 97.6%, resulting in a 94.0% award percentage under the portion of the 2020 LTIP grant that was performance-based. The following table provides a summary of each NEO’s earned performance shares, in both grant date fair value and shares, under the 2020 LTIP:

(1) Because Ms. Baker was no longer employed by the Company on February 14, 2021, the date that 2020 LTIP performance shares were measured based on the Company's 2020 operating results and deemed to be earned by grantees, Ms. Baker's forfeited her awards under the 2020 LTIP.

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the AIP and LTIP performance goals considering changes in the Company’s strategy, industry-specific market conditions, general economic conditions and other factors it deems relevant to determine whether the performance measures remain appropriate to properly motivate participants.

In 2020, the Company paid the monthly cost of club memberships to the Sarasota Yacht Club (“SYC”) for Mr. Jackson, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Boydston, the Company’s Senior Vice President of Corporate Sales and Innovation. Prior to our transition to a virtual-only annual meeting format due to the Pandemic, the SYC was traditionally the location of the Company’s annual stockholder meeting. Except for those club-membership dues the Company did not provide its NEOs with any separate dining or other facilities, company cars, other club dues, or other similar perquisites in 2020. Company-provided air travel for NEOs is for business purposes only. Any use of non-commercial aircraft on a rental basis is limited to appropriate business-only travel. There was no use of non-commercial aircraft on a rental basis in 2020. The Company’s health care, insurance, 401(k) plan, and other welfare and employee-benefit programs are substantially the same for all eligible employees, including the NEOs. Additionally, the Company does, within certain limits, provide our products free of charge to NEOs and certain of their direct reports for installation in their respective primary residences, pursuant to a policy adopted by our Board of Directors. The Company does not, however, pay for the cost of installing such product. The Company has occasionally

provided relocation benefits to NEOs in the past, including to Mr. Wothe in 2020 in connection with his relocation to Maricopa County, Arizona in early 2020, in connection with his appointment as President of WEBU in December 2019.

The value of benefits and perquisites provided to our NEOs in 2020 are presented in the “All Other Compensation” column (and described in the related footnotes, if required) of the “Summary Compensation Table”.

Retirement/Post-Employment Benefits. The Company does not provide any retirement programs, pension benefits or deferred compensation plans to its NEOs other than its 401(k) plan, which is available to all employees. The NEOs are eligible to participate in the Company’s, 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan on the same terms as other eligible employees.

The Company also provides severance protection to its NEOs upon qualifying terminations of employment and change in control termination, as further described in the Summary of Termination Payments and Benefits section below. The Company uses these benefits to attract and retain executives by providing protections like those provided by our competitors and peer group. In addition, the Company’s Board of Directors believes the change in control benefits would allow executives to focus on the evaluation and possible completion of change in control transactions without undue concern for their personal employment situations.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 162(m)”), generally disallows a federal tax deduction by the Company for compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1 million. Historically, compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) could be excluded from this $1 million limit, but that exception has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.

The Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors view the tax deductibility of executive compensation as one factor among many to be considered in the context of our overall compensation philosophy. Therefore, the Committee expects to recommend, and our Board of Directors expects to authorize, compensation in excess of $1,000,000 to named executive officers that will not be deductible under Section 162(m), when the Committee and Board believe doing so is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

We believe our compensation programs encourage and reward prudent business judgment without encouraging undue risk. The Company Committee reviews our compensation programs for features that might encourage inappropriate risk-taking. We believe our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors and available in the “Investors” section of our Company website at www.pgtinnovations.com in the section titled “Corporate Governance.” The Compensation Committee is composed of three directors, all of whom meet the heightened independence standards of both the NYSE Rules and SEC rules and regulations for Compensation Committee members. The Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to executive and director compensation.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section included in this Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021. Based on its review and these discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section be included in this Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2021.

											Non-Equity
											Incentive
							Equity Awards (2)				Plan
	(1)						Stock		Option		Compen-		All Other
Name and Position	Year		Salary		Bonus		Awards (3)		Awards		sation (4)		Compensation			Total
Jeffrey T. Jackson		2020	$	783,886	$	-	$	1,660,875	$	-	$	783,887	$	23,525	(7)	$	3,252,173
President and Chief		2019		747,115		-		1,350,000		-		373,558		18,350			2,489,023
Executive Officer		2018		597,633		-		900,000		-		806,804		20,750			2,325,187

Robert A. Keller		2020		365,822		-		288,400		-		250,222		7,995			912,439
President. Southeast		2019		349,038		-		227,500		-		110,994		8,226			695,758
Business Unit		2018		299,615		-		150,000		-		202,240		35,945			687,800

Mike Wothe (5)		2020		359,423		-		227,500		-		215,654		201,765	(8)		1,004,342
President, Western		2019		20,192		-		-		-		-		-			20,192
Business Unit

Brent Boydston		2020		313,562		-		200,850		-		207,892		18,330	(9)		740,634
Sr. Vice President, Corporate		2019		299,327		-		195,000		-		89,798		14,921			599,046
Sales and Innovation		2018		264,615		-		132,500		-		178,615		14,687			590,417

Sherri Baker (6)		2020		365,822		-		234,325		-		-		11,036	(10)		611,183
Sr. Vice President and		2019		249,038		-		306,000		-		80,938		159,971			795,947
Chief Financial Officer

(1) The fiscal year of 2020 was composed of 53 weeks. The fiscal years of 2019 and 2018 were composed of 52 weeks.

(2) Amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted during the reported fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Stock awards represent grants of restricted stock the values of which are calculated using (a) the number of shares awarded as of the grant date and (b) the market value of our common stock, which we define as the closing price of our common stock the business day prior to the grant date. There were no option awards during any reported fiscal year.

(3) Reflects annual equity incentive awards granted under the 2020 LTIP. For information regarding our 2020 LTIP, see the discussion in “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Long-Term Incentive Plan”. See the table titled "Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020" under the columns titled "Estimated Future Payouts in # of Shares Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards - Target" and "All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)". These amounts represent the total fair value of the shares granted, including those shares subject to Company performance criteria at target, at the grant date fair value of $16.56 per share. Regarding the shares awarded under the 2020 LTIP subject to Company performance criteria, the maximum number of shares possible under the award was 150% of target, which for Mr. Jackson was 75,220 shares, or grant date fair value of $1,245,657, for Mr. Keller was 13,062 shares, or grant date fair value of $216,300, for Mr. Wothe was 10,303 shares, or grant date fair value of $170,625, for Mr. Boydston was 9,096 shares, or grant date fair value of $150,638, and for Ms. Baker was 10,613 shares, or grant date fair value of $175,745. See also table titled "Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End 2020 - Stock Awards".

(4) Reflects annual cash incentive awards earned under the 2020, 2019, and 2018 AIPs. For information regarding our Annual Incentive Plan, see the discussion in “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Annual Cash Incentive Plan.”

(5) Mr. Wothe became President of our Western Business Unit effective on December 2, 2019.

(6) Ms. Baker was appointed as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective on April 8, 2019. On January 8, 2021, Ms. Baker notified the Company that she would be resigning from the Company effective at the close of business on February 7, 2021.

(7) Includes the taxable values of dues paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. Jackson for his membership at the Sarasota Yacht Club of $11,949, employer matching contributions under the PGT Industries, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan of $5,244, free products provided to Mr. Jackson by the Company, pursuant to a Board of Directors approved program, of $4,347, and Company-paid premiums for life insurance exceeding $50,000 of $1,985.

(8) Includes the taxable value of relocation benefits of $197,323 provided to Mr. Wothe relating to his relocation to Arizona due to his appointment as President of our Western Business Unit. Also includes employer matching contributions under the PGT Industries, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan of $4,442.

(9) Includes the taxable values of dues paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. Boydston for his membership at the Sarasota Yacht Club of $11,049, employer matching contributions under the PGT Industries, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan of $6,570, and the taxable value of Company-paid premiums for life insurance exceeding $50,000 of $711.

(10) Includes the taxable values of employer matching contributions under the PGT Industries, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan of $10,480, and the taxable value of Company-paid premiums for life insurance exceeding $50,000 of $556.

The following table contains information concerning the potential threshold, target and maximum payments originally applicable to each of our NEOs under the 2020 AIP and 2020 LTIP. Awards earned by our NEOs under the 2020 AIP are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the column titled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”. Awards earned by our NEOs under the 2020 AIP were paid in February 2021. Awards granted to our NEOs under the 2020 LTIP are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the column titled “Equity Awards – Stock Awards”.

	Estimated Possible Payouts in $ Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)						Estimated Future Payouts in # of Shares Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)							All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock			Grant Date Fair Value in $ of Stock and Option Awards
Name	Threshold		Target		Maximum		Threshold		Target		Maximum			or Units (#)			(3) (4) (5)
Jeffrey T. Jackson	$	391,943	$	783,886	$	-		-		-		-			-		$	-
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		-		-		-			50,147	(3)		830,438
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		25,074		50,147		75,220	(4)		-			830,438

Robert A. Keller		109,747		219,493		-		-		-		-			-			-
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		-		-		-			8,708	(3)		144,200
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		4,354		8,708		13,062	(4)		-			144,200

Mike Wothe		107,827		215,654		-		-		-		-			-			-
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		-		-		-			6,869	(3)		113,750
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		3,435		6,869		10,303	(4)		-			113,750

Brent Boydston		94,069		188,137		-		-		-		-			-			-
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		-		-		-			6,064	(3)		100,425
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		3,032		6,064		9,096	(4)		-			100,425

Sherri Baker (6)		118,893		237,784		-		-		-		-			-			-
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		-		-		-			7,075	(3)		117,163
Granted 02/14/20		-		-		-		3,538		7,075		10,613	(4)		-			117,163

(1) These columns show the range of payouts targeted for 2020 performance under the 2020 AIP. For more information regarding the 2020 AIP, see the discussion in "Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Annual Cash Incentive Plan". Payments of cash bonuses to be made to participants in 2021, related to the 2020 AIP, were made on February 26, 2021, and the amounts are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the column titled "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation". The 2020 AIP had no stated maximum payout.

(2) These columns show the range of payouts targeted for 2020 performance under the 2020 LTIP. For more information regarding the 2020 LTIP, see the discussion in "Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Long-Term Incentive Plan".

(3) Represents restricted stock awarded under the 2020 LTIP for which there is no Company performance criteria. The restrictions lapse over time in three equal amounts on the first, second and third anniversary dates of the grant date of February 14, 2020. See also table titled "Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End 2020 - Stock Awards". The grant date fair value of these awards are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the column titled "Equity Awards - Stock Awards" for 2020.

(4) Represents restricted stock awarded under the 2020 LTIP, subject to Company performance criteria. The performance criteria provides for a graded awarding of shares based on the Company's EBIT performance for 2020. The grant date fair value of these awards are based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions at the time of the date of grant. Accordingly, the values set forth in the above table assume target performance. Based on the Company's 2020 results, the actual number of shares earned under this grant was 94.0% of the Target award, which for Mr. Jackson was 47,139 shares, or grant date fair value of $780,620; for Mr. Keller was 8,186 shares, or grant date fair value of $135,560; for Mr. Wothe was 6,457 shares, or grant date fair value of $106,928; and for Mr. Boydston was 5,701 shares, or grant date fair value of $94,409. See note (6) below regarding Ms. Baker's awards under the 2020 LTIP. Performance restricted shares earned under this grant vest in two equal amounts on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date of February 14, 2020. See also "Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End 2020 - Stock Awards".

(5) The grant date fair value of stock awards was calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, based on the grant date fair market value of our common stock, which we define as the closing price of our common stock the business day prior to the grant date, which was $16.56 per share. See "Summary Compensation Table - Equity Awards - Stock Awards".

(6) Ms. Baker's resignation from the Company was effective on February 7, 2021, resulting in the forfeiture by her of all outstanding unvested equity effective on that date, including all equity as discussed in footnotes (3) an (4) above.

	Option Awards						Stock Awards
	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options		Option Exercise		Option Expiration		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have
Name	Exercisable		Price		Date		Not Vested			Not Vested (1)
Jeffrey T. Jackson		-		-		-		-		$	-
		-		-		-		50,147	(2)		1,019,990	(2)
		-		-		-		50,147	(3)		1,019,990	(3)
		-		-		-		25,338	(4)		515,375	(4)
		-		-		-		8,152	(5)		165,812	(5)
		-		-		-		18,343	(6)		373,097	(6)

Robert A. Keller		-		-		-		-			-
		-		-		-		8,708	(2)		177,121	(2)
		-		-		-		8,708	(3)		177,121	(3)
		-		-		-		4,270	(4)		86,852	(4)
		-		-		-		1,359	(5)		27,642	(5)
		-		-		-		3,057	(6)		62,179	(6)

Mike Wothe		-		-		-		-			-
		-		-		-		6,869	(2)		139,715	(2)
		-		-		-		6,869	(3)		139,715	(3)

Brent Boydston		-		-		-		-			-
		-		-		-		6,064	(2)		123,342	(2)
		-		-		-		6,064	(3)		123,342	(3)
		-		-		-		3,660	(4)		74,444	(4)
		-		-		-		1,200	(5)		24,408	(5)
		-		-		-		2,701	(6)		54,938	(6)

Sherri Baker		-		-		-		-			-
		-		-		-		14,306	(7)		290,984	(7)
		-		-		-		7,075	(7)		143,906	(7)
		-		-		-		7,075	(7)		143,906	(7)

(1) Values are based on the closing price on the NYSE of our common stock on December 31, 2020, the last day on which stock markets were open during our 2020 fiscal year, which was $20.34.

(2) Represents restricted stock awarded under the 2020 LTIP for which there is no Company performance criteria. The restrictions lapse over time in three equal amounts on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date of February 14, 2020. See table titled "Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020 - All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)" and "Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020 - Grant Date Fair Value in $ of Stock and Option Awards". The grant date fair value of this award is also included in the Summary Compensation Table under the column titled "Equity Awards - Stock Awards" for 2020.

(3) Represents restricted stock awarded under the 2020 LTIP, that is subject to Company EBIT performance criteria. The design of this element of the 2020 LTIP provides for a graded awarding of shares, including a threshold, target, and maximum, based on the level of the Company's EBIT performance achieved for 2020. The number of shares presented in this row is the target number of performance shares. Based on the Company's 2020 results, the actual number of shares awarded under this grant was 94.0% of the target award, which for Mr. Jackson was 47,139 shares, or grant date fair value of $780,620; for Mr. Keller was 8,186 shares, or grant date fair value of $135,560; for Mr. Wothe was 6,457 shares, or grant date fair value of $106,928; and for Mr. Boydston was 5,701 shares, or grant date fair value of $94,409. Restricted shares earned under this grant vest in two equal amounts on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date of February 14, 2020. See "Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020 - Estimated Future Payouts in # of Shares Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards" and "Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020 - Grant Date Fair Value in $ of Stock and Option Awards". The grant date fair value of this award is also included in the Summary Compensation Table under the column titled "Equity Awards - Stock Awards" for 2020.

(4) Represents restricted stock awarded under the 2019 LTIP for which there is no Company EBIT performance criteria. The restrictions lapse over time in three equal amounts on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date of February 14, 2019.

(5) Represents restricted stock awarded under the 2018 LTIP for which there is no Company EBIT performance criteria. The restrictions lapse over time in three equal amounts on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date of March 2, 2018.

(6) Represents restricted stock awarded under the 2018 LTIP, which was subject to Company EBIT performance criteria. Restricted shares earned under this grant vest in two equal amounts on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date of March 2, 2018.

(7) Ms. Baker's resignation of her employment with the Company was effective on February 7, 2021, resulting in this outstanding unvested equity award being forfeited by her the close of business on February 7, 2021.

(1) The value realized on the vesting of stock awards is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the day before the date the restrictions on the stock lapse (used for purposes of determining income taxable to the individual).

The Company’s standard practice is to enter into employment agreements with each of its NEOs. The Company and its NEOs entered into employment agreements effective on May 26, 2018 for Mr. Jackson, and January 1, 2021 for each of Messrs. Keller, Boydston and Wothe, that superseded and replaced any prior employment agreement. Sherri Baker, the Company’s former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, entered into an employment agreement with the Company, which was effective on March 26, 2019. However, effective with the close of business on February 7, 2021, Ms. Baker’s employment with the Company ended and, therefore, her employment agreement with the Company terminated at that time.

Pursuant to the employment agreements referenced above, in the event that (a) the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” (as defined in the employment agreement) or (b) the executive terminates his or her employment for “good reason” (as defined in the employment agreement), and subject to the execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims against the Company and its affiliates, the executive is entitled to (1) continuation of his or her base salary for twelve months after the date of termination (except in the case of Mr. Jackson, for whom the period is thirty months), (2) payment by the Company of applicable premiums for medical benefits for twelve months following the date of termination (except in the case of Mr. Jackson for whom the period is thirty months), and (3) payment in a lump sum of an amount of cash equal to 100% of the executive’s target incentive amount (except for Mr. Jackson for whom such percentage is 250%) payable under the Company’s annual incentive plan for the award period ending in which the termination of employment occurred. Except for Mr. Jackson, whose employment agreement executed on May 26, 2018 does not contain an escalation of salary continuation relating to a change in control, pursuant to the newly executed employment agreements effective January 1, 2021, continuation of the executive’s base salary is increased to twenty-four months in the event that the executive’s employment is terminated at the time of, or within twelve months of, a change in control (as defined in the employment agreement).

Should the executive terminate his or her employment other than for “good reason”, the Company will continue to pay such executive’s base salary for the shorter of thirty days (except in the case of Mr. Jackson, for whom the period is ninety days) or the notice period provided by the executive with respect to his or her termination. Further, under each employment agreement, in the event that the executive’s employment is terminated by his or her death or disability (as defined in the employment agreement), the Company will pay to the executive (or, in the case of death, to his or her designated beneficiary) his or her base salary for a period of twelve months.

Each employment agreement also provides that during the executive’s employment with the Company and thereafter, he or she may not disclose any confidential information of the Company and that all inventions of the executive shall belong exclusively to the Company. In addition, each employment agreement provides that during the executive’s employment with the Company and for two years thereafter, unless the employment agreement is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by such executive for “good reason”, in which case the period will be the duration of the executive’s employment with the Company and for one year thereafter, the executive may not directly or indirectly (i) compete with the Company, (ii) solicit or induce any employee or agent of the Company to terminate his or her relationship with the Company or (iii) induce or attempt to induce any supplier or contractor of the Company to terminate or adversely change its relationship with the Company or otherwise interfere with any relationship between the Company and any of its suppliers or contractors.

The following table summarizes the value of the termination payments and benefits that each of our NEOs would receive under the circumstances shown had such circumstances occurred on the last business day of our 2020 fiscal year. The amounts shown in the table exclude distributions under the 401(k) plan and any additional benefits that are generally available to all our salaried employees.

(1) Includes the dollar value of continuation of Mr. Jackson's then-current annual base salary for a period of thirty months, plus 250% of his target AIP amount, as well as the value associated with the continued provision of health benefits for a period of thirty months totaling $56,575. Includes the dollar value of continuation of Mr. Keller's then-current annual base salary for a period of twelve months, plus 100% of his target AIP amount, as well as the value associated with the continued provision of health benefits for a period of twelve months totaling $22,630. Includes the dollar value of continuation of Mr. Wothe’s then-current annual base salary for a period of twelve months, plus 100% of his target AIP amount. Mr. Wothe does not obtain his healthcare coverage through a Company-sponsored plan. As such, the value associated with the continued provision of health benefits for a period of twelve months for Mr. Wothe is zero. Includes the dollar value of continuation of Mr. Boydston's then-current annual base salary for a period of twelve months, plus 100% of his target AIP amount, as well as the value associated with the continued provision of health benefits for a period of twelve months totaling $22,630. Includes the dollar value of continuation of Ms. Baker's then-current annual base salary for a period of twelve months, plus 100% of her target AIP amount, as well as the value associated with the continued provision of health benefits for a period of twelve months totaling $13,600. However, see note (6) below. The value associated with the continuation of health benefits is based on the combined total of premiums paid by both the employer and employee for health insurance during 2020, multiplied by the amount of time each NEO is entitled to those benefits pursuant to their respective employment agreements.

(2) Equals the dollar value of continuation of the NEO's then-current annual base salary for a period of 30 days, except for Mr. Jackson, whose continuation period is 90 days.

(3) Includes the dollar value of continuation of benefits as described in (1) above, except that for NEOs other than Mr. Jackson, the period of continuation of the NEOs then-current base salary is doubled to twenty-four months for termination at the time of, or within twelve months of, a change in control (as defined in the employments agreement). Mr. Jackson's current employment agreement with the Company dated May 26, 2018 does not provide for an escalation of salary continuation benefits under a change of control.

(4) Equals the market value of shares awarded under our long-term incentive plans for which restrictions had not yet lapsed as of January 2, 2021, but for which the restrictions would lapse and be deemed fully vested, and any performance conditions would be deemed fully achieved, in the event of a termination of employment at or 12 months after a change in control, pursuant to the change-in-control provisions of both the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan. These dollar amounts are based on the closing price on the NYSE of $20.34 of our common stock on December 31, 2020, the last day of trading before the end of our 2020 fiscal year.

(5) Does not include the dollar value of potential short-term and/or long-term disability payments.

(6) Equals the dollar value of continuation of the NEO's then-current annual base salary for a period of twelve months.

(7) Ms. Baker’s rights to termination payments and benefits ended on the effective date of her resignation from the Company, February 7, 2021.

The 2020 AIP is discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Annual Cash Incentive Plan.”

The 2020 LTIP is discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

Change in control benefits may be payable under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2014 Omnibus Equity Plan, and the 2019 Equity and Incentive Plan. The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan provides that, unless otherwise determined by the board and evidenced in an award agreement, all outstanding awards will generally vest in full (with performance objectives deemed “fully achieved”) upon a change in control. The 2014 Omnibus Equity Plan and the 2019 Equity and Incentive Plan provide that, unless otherwise determined by the administrator and evidenced in an award agreement, if a participant’s service is terminated without cause or for good reason on or within 12 months following a change in control, then outstanding awards will generally vest in full (with performance objectives deemed “fully achieved”).

In addition, with respect to Messrs. Keller, Wothe and Boydston, with the execution of their new employment agreements, effective January 1, 2021, in the event that any one of those executives’ employment is terminated by the Company (or a successor employer to the Company) without cause or the executive terminates his employment for good reason, at the time of or within twelve months after the effective date of a change of control of the Company (as defined in the employment agreement), then the Company (or the successor employer to the Company following the change of control) will pay to the executive: (1) twenty-four months of the executive’s base salary in a lump sum no later than the sixtieth day following the executive’s separation from service, subject to certain exceptions that may be necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; (2) 200% of the target amount of the executive’s annual incentive plan payment, no later than the sixtieth day following the executive’s separation from service, subject to certain exceptions that may be necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and (3) payment by the Company (or the successor employer to the Company after the change of control) of applicable premiums for medical benefits for twenty-four months following the date of termination.

Annual compensation for the non-management members of our Board of Directors typically is established in May of each year. In 2020, all non-management directors received the following annual compensation: (a) a cash retainer of $57,500; (b) restricted stock, the restrictions on which are scheduled to lapse on the first anniversary of the date of grant, which is generally granted at or around the time of the annual meeting of shareholders each year, with a value at the time of grant in 2020 of $71,000; (c) an annual cash retainer for non-Chair members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance Committee of $7,500, $5,000 and $5,000 each, respectively; and (d) an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for the Chair of the Board of Directors, $10,000 for the Chair of the Audit Committee, $7,750 for the Chair of the Compensation Committee and $5,000 for the Chair of the Governance Committee. Members also receive reimbursement of reasonable travel expenses, which typically does not exceed $5,000 annually, but which is not considered to be compensation for purposes of the table set forth below.

	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash for Service on
Name	Our Board of Directors		Committees of Our Board of Directors		Stock Awards (1)		All Other Compen- sation		Total
Sheree L. Bargabos	$	57,500	$	5,000	$	71,000	$	-	$	133,500
Alexander R. Castaldi		57,500		7,750		71,000		-		136,250
Richard D. Feintuch (2)		57,500		12,500		71,000		-		141,000
Rodney Hershberger (3)		57,500		10,000		71,000		-		138,500
Brett N. Milgrim		57,500		5,000		71,000		-		133,500
William J. Morgan		57,500		15,000		71,000		-		143,500
Frances Powell Hawes (4)		57,500		7,500		71,000		-		136,000
Floyd F. Sherman (5)		57,500		5,000		71,000		-		133,500

(1) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted during the reported fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The stock awards represent grants of restricted stock the values of which are calculated using (a) the number of shares awarded as of the grant date, or 5,295 shares, and (b) the market value of our common stock on the date awarded, which we define as the closing price of our common stock the business day prior to the grant date of May 21, 2020, or $13.41 per share. The restrictions on these shares lapse on May 21, 2021, the first anniversary of the grant date. However, see notes (2) and (4) regarding deferral elections executed by Mr. Feintuch and Ms. Powell-Hawes, respectively.

(2) In December 2017, Mr. Feintuch executed a valid deferral election to defer the issuance to him of shares arising from the vesting of his stock awards, beginning with stock awards granted in May 2018, and continuing indefinitely thereafter. Pursuant to his deferral agreement, the issuance of such shares to him and the income to him related thereto, will be deferred until the earliest of (i) his separation from service to the Company, as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, (ii) a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Company's equity incentive plans, or (iii) his disability or death, as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

(3) During 2020, Mr. Hershberger received ordinary taxable income of $2,224,229 from the Company. This ordinary taxable income included $2,198,302 of income from equity awards, and $25,927 of ordinary taxable income received by Mr. Hershberger in 2020 representing the pre-tax value of healthcare benefits paid for by the Company on Mr. Hershberger's behalf. The income of $2,198,302 from equity awards included, which included $1,773,709 from the exercise of 151,754 fully-vested stock options, and $424,593 from the lapse of restrictions on 26,503 shares of restricted stock, received under the Company's incentive compensation plans during the time Mr. Hershberger was an employee of the Company before his retirement effective on December 31, 2017. The stock options exercised by Mr. Hershberger in 2020 were done so pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan executed by Mr. Hershberger, whereby he exercised approximately 50,000 stock options each calendar month, until all remaining stock options held by him had

been exercised. As of January 2, 2021, Mr. Hershberger had no remaining unexercised options to purchase our common stock.

During 2020, Mr. Hershberger also received $350,000 under an independent contractor agreement with a one-year term between him and the Company executed on January 1, 2020, pursuant to which Mr. Hershberger provided services to the Company as specified in the independent contractor agreement. The agreement provided for monthly payments of $29,167 for twelve months. The independent contractor agreement between the Company and Mr. Hershberger was not renewed effective on January 1, 2021.

The Company reimburses Mr. Hershberger for the dues relating to his membership to the Sarasota Yacht Club. Such reimbursements totaled $7,804 in 2020.

(4) In December 2020, Ms. Powell-Hawes executed a valid deferral election to defer the issuance of shares of Company common stock, and related income, to her arising out of the vestings of her stock awards, beginning with stock awards to be granted in May 2021, and continuing indefinitely thereafter. Pursuant to her deferral agreement, the issuance of such shares of Company common stock to her, and the income related thereto, will be deferred until the earliest of (i) her separation of service from the Company, as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, (ii) a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Company's equity incentive plans, or (iii) her disability or death, as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

(5) As of January 2, 2021, Mr. Sherman held a total of 67,797 exercisable options to purchase our common stock, which have an exercise price of $2.04 per share and expire on May 3, 2022. On April 14, 2021, Mr. Sherman exercised these options.

The following table summarizes information, as of January 2, 2021, relating to the Company’s equity compensation plans pursuant to which stock options, restricted stock or other rights to acquire shares may be granted from time to time.

(1) Represents the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company in May 2019. A description of the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan is included in Note 18 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2021. There have been no options to purchase the Company's common stock granted under the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan.

(2) Represents options granted under the Company's 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2006 Plan") approved by the stockholders of the Company in June 2006, as amended, and restated and approved by the stockholders on April 6, 2010. A description of the 2006 Plan is included in Note 18 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2021. Upon the adoption of the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, the Board determined that no further shares would be granted under the 2006 Plan and, therefore, no shares are available for future issuance under the 2006 Plan. On April 14, 2021, these options were exercised.

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of the individual identified as our “median” employee and the annual total compensation of Jeff Jackson, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”).

The methodology and material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates used to identify our median employee for this purpose were as follows:

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median paid employee and calculating this pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and assumptions. As a result, the pay ratio reported above may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.

Our Compensation Committee consists of independent, non-employee directors only. Messrs. Castaldi, Milgrim, and Sherman serve as members of our Compensation Committee. No interlocking relationship existed during 2020 between our executive officers, members of our Board of Directors or members of our Compensation Committee, and the executive officers, members of the board of directors or members of the compensation committee of the board of directors of any other company.

All related party transactions are reviewed and, as appropriate, may be approved or ratified by the Audit Committee based upon our written policies and procedures. If a director is involved in the transaction, the director may not participate in any review, approval or ratification of such transaction. Related party transactions are approved by the Audit Committee only if, based on all the facts and circumstances, they are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and the best interests of our stockholders. The Audit Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction. The Audit Committee may also impose such conditions as it deems necessary and appropriate on the Company or the related party in connection with the transaction.

In the case of a transaction presented to the Audit Committee, the committee may approve or disapprove the transaction or ratify or determine whether rescission of the transaction is appropriate.

As discussed above, our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Castaldi, Feintuch, Milgrim, Morgan, and Sherman, Ms. Bargabos, and Ms. Powell Hawes are “independent” directors. As part of our Board of Directors’ process in making such determination, it also determined that each such director has no other “material relationship” with the Company that could interfere with his or her ability to exercise independent judgment.

Since December 29, 2019, (the first day of our 2020 fiscal year), there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or are to be a party in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any director, director nominee, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of our common stock, or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing, had or will have a direct or indirect interest other than compensation arrangements, which are described above, or sales of products to Builders FirstSource, Inc. made in the ordinary course of business on customary terms and conditions which are described below.

In the ordinary course of business, we sell products to Builders FirstSource, Inc. Two of our directors, Floyd F. Sherman and Brett N. Milgrim, are directors of Builders FirstSource, Inc. In addition, until his retirement effective January 1, 2018, Mr. Sherman served as chief executive officer of Builders FirstSource, Inc. Total net sales to Builders FirstSource, Inc. were approximately $21,900,000 for the year ended January 2, 2021. We anticipate continuing to make sales of our products to Builders FirstSource, Inc. in the foreseeable future.

Our Board of Directors has ultimate authority and responsibility for effective corporate governance, including the role of oversight of the management of the Company. The Audit Committee’s purpose is to assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Company and its stockholders by overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company, the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the qualifications, selection and performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee reviews our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. The Audit Committee relies on the expertise and knowledge of management and the independent registered public accounting firm in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. Management has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining effective systems of internal and disclosure controls, for preparing financial statements, and for the public reporting process. KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020, was responsible for expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended January 2, 2021, with generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of internal control over our financial reporting.

With respect to the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021, the Audit Committee, among other things, oversaw the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and financial reporting processes, oversaw compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, reviewed the qualifications and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, and evaluated the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm and received reports and presentations from the Company’s internal audit department and discussed the nature and quality of the work performed by the internal audit department.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG LLP the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 2, 2021. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG LLP all matters required to be discussed pursuant to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. In addition, the Audit Committee has received from KPMG LLP the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence from the Company and the Company’s management.

Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors, and our Board of Directors approved, inclusion of the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2021 for filing with the SEC.

* The information contained in this section shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically requests that the information contained in this section be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates the information contained in this section by reference.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, oversight, and evaluation of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has the sole and direct authority to engage, appoint, and replace our independent auditors. In addition, the Audit Committee has established in its charter a policy that every engagement of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to perform audit or permissible non-audit services on behalf of the Company or any of its subsidiaries requires pre-approval from the Audit Committee or its designee before such independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to provide those services. Our independent registered public accounting firm may not be retained to perform the non-audit services specified in Section 10A(g) of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee reviews and, in its sole discretion, approves in advance the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s annual engagement letter, including the proposed fees contained therein, as well as all audit and, as provided in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the SEC rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, all permitted non-audit engagements and relationships between the Company and such independent registered public accounting firm (which approval may be made after receiving input from the Company’s management, if desired).

With respect to the audits for the years ended January 2, 2021 and December 28, 2019, the Audit Committee approved the audit services performed by KPMG LLP.

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for the years ended January 2, 2021 and December 28, 2019 were (in thousands):

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we have no knowledge of any business, other than as described herein and customary procedural matters that will be presented for consideration during the Meeting. By submitting the proxy, the stockholder authorizes the persons named on the proxy to use their discretion in voting on any matter brought before the Meeting. Moreover, our Board of Directors reserves the right to adjourn or possibly postpone the Meeting for failure to obtain a quorum or otherwise based on any circumstances that our Board of Directors believes would cause such adjournments or postponements to be in the best interests of our stockholders.

To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement and form of proxy and acted upon at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2022 Meeting”), proposals by stockholders for business other than director nominations must be submitted in writing and received by our Secretary, by December 24, 2021 and must comply with the other requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.

Our By-Laws establish advanced-notice procedures regarding director nominations by stockholders. A formal nomination by a stockholder of a candidate for election as a director to be considered at the 2022 Meeting must be submitted in writing and received by our Secretary, between January 20, 2022 and February 19, 2022, in accordance with our By-Laws.

Our By-Laws also establish advance notice procedures regarding other business to be brought before the 2022 Meeting. A formal notice of a matter to be presented at the 2022 Annual Meeting must be submitted in writing and received by our Secretary, between January 20, 2022 and February 19, 2022, in accordance with our By-Laws.

Each proposal submitted must be a proper subject for stockholder action at the 2022 Meeting, and all proposals and director nominations must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act or our By-Laws, as applicable. All proposals and director nominations must be submitted in writing to: General Counsel and Secretary, PGT Innovations, Inc., 1070 Technology Drive, North Venice, Florida 34275. The stockholder proponent must appear in person to present the proposal or director nomination at the 2022 Meeting or send a qualified representative to present such proposal or director nomination. Other than proposals submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with the requirements of, Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, a stockholder is not entitled to have its proposal or director nomination included in next year’s proxy statement and form of proxy. If a stockholder gives notice after the applicable deadlines or otherwise does not satisfy the applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act or our By-Laws, the stockholder will not be permitted to include the proposal in the 2022 proxy statement and form of proxy or present the proposal or director nomination for a vote at the 2022 Meeting.

A copy of our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders is being mailed concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote during the Meeting. Our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and shall not be deemed to be solicitation material. A copy of our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders and this Proxy Statement are available without charge at www.proxydocs.com/PGTI. These proxy materials are also available in print to stockholders without charge and upon request, addressed to PGT Innovations, Inc., 1070 Technology Drive, North Venice, Florida 34275, Attention: General Counsel and Secretary.

We have not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement the information included on or linked from our website, and you should not consider it to be part of this Proxy Statement.

If you have any questions, or need assistance in voting your shares, please call American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC toll-free at (800) 937-5449 or locally and internationally at (718) 921-8124.



Trex Company	Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
AAON	American Woodmark Corp.
Gibraltar Industries, Inc.	Simpson MFG
Armstrong World Industries	Continental Building Products
Quanex Building Products

	2020 Annual Base Salary	2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan	2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Jeffrey T. Jackson	24%	24%	52%
Robert A. Keller	42%	25%	33%
Mike Wothe	45%	27%	28%
Brent Boydston	45%	27%	28%
Sherri Baker	44%	28%	28%

Performance Measure (1)	Target Alloc- ation	Minimum Performance Measure	Target Performance Measure	133% Level Performance Measure	Actual Performance Results (1)	Performance Rating (2)	Payout Percent- age (2)(3)
Performance measure %		80%	100%	133%
Payout % of target		50%	100%	200%
EBITDA Consolidated	100%	$120.0	$150.0	$200.0	$149.9	99.9%	100.0%
EBITDA SEBU	100%	$88.9	$111.1	$148.1	$118.7	106.8%	114.0%
EBITDA WEBU (3)	100%	$21.9	$27.4	$36.5	$24.2	88.3%	100.0%

		Calculation of 2020 AIP:
	2020 Target Payment Amount	Percentage of Target Paid	2020 Actual Payment Amount
Jeffrey T. Jackson (1)	$783,886	100.0%	$783,887
Robert A. Keller (2)	$219,493	114.0%	$250,222
Mike Wothe (3)	$215,654	100.0%	$215,654
Brent Boydston (4)	$188,137	110.5%	$207,892
Sherri Baker (5)	$237,784	0.0%	$0

	2020 LTIP			Fixed LTIP		Performance LTIP
	$	Grant Date Fair Value Per Share	Target Shares	$	Target Shares	$	Target Shares
Jeffrey T. Jackson	$1,660,875	$16.56	100,294	$830,438	50,147	$830,438	50,147
Robert A. Keller	$288,400	$16.56	17,416	$144,200	8,708	$144,200	8,708
Mike Wothe	$227,500	$16.56	13,738	$113,750	6,869	$113,750	6,869
Brent Boydston	$200,850	$16.56	12,128	$100,425	6,064	$100,425	6,064
Sherri Baker	$234,325	$16.56	14,150	$117,163	7,075	$117,163	7,075

		Page
INTRODUCTION		1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING AND THE ANNUAL MEETING		2
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS		8
Class III - Directors with Terms Expiring in 2021		9
CONTINUING DIRECTORS		9
Class I - Directors with Terms Expiring in 2022		9
Class II - Directors with Terms Expiring in 2023		10
GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY		12
Board of Directors and Committees		12
Audit Committee		12
Compensation Committee		12
Governance Committee		12
Board Attendance		13
Board Leadership and Structure		13
Risk Oversight		14
Environmental Responsibility		14
Energy and Fuel Management		14
How Our Products Promote Energy Efficiency		15
Employee Safety		15
Labor Practices and Human Rights		16
Workforce Diversity and Inclusion and Human Capital Management		16
Governance		17
Director Independence		18
Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors		18
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics		19
Assessment of Director Candidates and Required Qualifications		19
Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations for Election to the Board		20
Information About Our Board of Directors and Executive Officers		20
PROPOSAL 2 – APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS		21
PROPOSAL 3 – APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NEOs ON AN ADVISORY BASIS		22
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		23
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934		24
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS		25
Management		25
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives		27
Roles and Responsibilities		27
Use of Peer Group Data		28
Compensation Actions for 2020		28
Compensation Elements We Used in 2020		29
Annual Base Salary		29
Annual Cash Incentive Plan		30
Long-Term Incentive Plan		32
Executive Benefits and Perquisites		34
Other Compensation		35
Policy on Compensation Tax Deductibility		35
Risk Assessment in Compensation Programs		35

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT		36
Summary Compensation Table		37
Grants of Plan Based Awards for 2020		38
Oustanding Equity Awards at Year-End 2020		40
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table		41
Employment Agreements		42
Summary of Termination Payments and Benefits		43
2020 Annual Incentive Plan		44
2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan		44
Change in Control Agreements		44
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES		45
Information on the Compensation of Directors		45
Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2020		45
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION		46
CEO PAY RATIO		47
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION		48
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS		48
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT		49
Principal Accountant Fees and Services		50
Fees Paid to the Principal Accountant		50
OTHER BUSINESS		50
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS OR NOMINATIONS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING		51
Proxy Statement Proposals		51
Director Nominations		51
Matters for Annual Meeting Agenda		51
General Requirements		51
GENERAL INFORMATION		52

Name	Age	Class and Position	Date Elected or Appointed Director
Xavier F. Boza*	56	Class I Director	2021
Alexander R. Castaldi*	71	Class I Director	2004
William J. Morgan*	74	Class I Director	2007
Richard D. Feintuch*	68	Class II Director	2006
Jeffrey T. Jackson	55	Class II Director	2016
Brett N. Milgrim*	52	Class II Director	2003
Frances Powell Hawes*	66	Class II Director	2019
Sheree L. Bargabos*	65	Class III Director	2016
Rodney Hershberger	64	Class III Director	2004
Floyd F. Sherman *	81	Class III Director	2005

Name	Audit Committee	Compensation Committee	Governance Committee
Sheree L. Bargabos			Member
Xavier Boza (since March 1, 2021)		Member
Alexander R. Castaldi		Chair
Richard D. Feintuch	Member		Chair
Frances Powell Hawes	Member
Brett N. Milgrim		Member
William J. Morgan	Chair		Member
Floyd F. Sherman		Member

Name	Age	Position at End of 2020
Jeffrey T. Jackson	55	President and Chief Executive Officer
Robert A. Keller	49	President – Southeast Business Unit
Mike Wothe	57	President – Western Business Unit
Brent Boydston	52	Senior Vice President – Corporate Sales and Innovation
Sherri Baker	48	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*

	2019 Annual Base Salary Rate	2020 Annual Base Salary Rate
Jeffrey T. Jackson	$750,000	$772,500
Robert A. Keller	$350,000	$360,500
Mike Wothe	$350,000	$350,000
Brent Boydston	$300,000	$309,000
Sherri Baker	$350,000	$360,500

Performance Measure (1)	Target Alloc- ation	Threshold Performance Measure	Target Performance Measure	Maximum Performance Measure	Actual Performance Results (1)	Performance Rating (2)	Award Percent- age (2)
Performance measure %		80.0%	100.0%	120.0%
Payout % of target		50.0%	100.0%	150.0%
EBIT Consolidated	100%	$87.8	$109.7	$131.6	$107.1	97.6%	94.0%

	2020 Performance LTIP Amount in Shares (Target)	Awarded Shares as % of Target	2020 Performance LTIP Awarded Shares	Grant Date Fair Value per Share	2020 Performance LTIP Award in $
Jeffrey T. Jackson	50,147	94.0%	47,139	$16.56	$780,620
Robert A. Keller	8,708	94.0%	8,186	$16.56	$135,560
Mike Wothe	6,869	94.0%	6,457	$16.56	$106,928
Brent Boydston	6,064	94.0%	5,701	$16.56	$94,409
Sherri Baker (1)	7,075	0.0%	0	$16.56	$0

	Option Awards				Stock Awards(1)
	Number of Shares Acquired		Value Realized on		Number of Shares Acquired		Value Realized on
Name	on Exercise		Exercise		on Vesting		Vesting
Jeffrey T. Jackson		-	$	-		55,020	$	865,742
Robert A. Keller		-		-		10,596		167,148
Mike Wothe		-		-		-		-
Brent Boydston		-		-		9,309		146,803
Sherri Baker		-		-		7,153		57,224

	Jeffrey	Robert	Mike	Brent	Sherri
Reason for Termination:	Jackson	Keller	Wothe	Boydston	Baker(7)
By Company Without Cause or by the Executive With "Good Reason"
Cash Severance (1)	$3,919,075	$599,430	$560,000	$517,030	$608,425
By the Executive Without "Good Reason"
Cash Severance (2)	$193,125	$30,042	$29,167	$25,750	$30,042
Change In Control
Cash Severance (3)	$3,919,075	$959,930	$910,000	$826,030	$968,925
Market Value of Equity (4)	$3,094,263	530,915	$279,431	400,474	578,795
Death or Disability (5)
Cash Severance (6)	$772,500	$360,500	$350,000	$309,000	$360,500

	2020		2019
Type of Fee
Audit Fees (1)	$	2,195	$	2,227
Audit-Related Fees (2)		143		-
Tax Fees		-		-
All Other Fees		-		-
Total Fees	$	2,338	$	2,227