XML 33 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement
 
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement ("ASC 820") includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy is based on observable or unobservable inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon its own market assumptions.
 
The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
 
Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs, which are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Inputs that are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable.
 
As of December 31, 2017 the Company no longer has any Level 3 assets or liabilities remaining on its condensed consolidated financial statements as a result of the finalization of the contingent consideration liabilities discussed in Note 3. As of December 31, 2016, the only Level 3 liabilities on the Company's financial statements related to its potential contingent consideration payments from acquisitions occurring subsequent to January 1, 2009. The fair value of the liabilities determined by this analysis was primarily driven by the probability of reaching the performance measures required by the applicable purchase agreements and the associated discount rates. Probabilities were estimated by reviewing financial forecasts and assessing the likelihood of reaching the required performance measures based on factors specific to each acquisition as well as the Company’s historical experience with similar arrangements. If an acquisition reached the required performance measure, the estimated probability would be increased to 100% and reclassified to due to seller, and if the measure was not reached, the probability would have been reduced to reflect the amount earned, if any, depending on the terms of the agreement. Discount rates were determined by applying a risk premium to a risk-free interest rate.
 
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the basis of measurement at December 31, 2016 (in thousands): 
At December 31, 2016
Total Fair Value
Measurement
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs 
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Contingent consideration
$
19,283

 
$

 
$

 
$
19,283

 
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):
 
Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Contingent Consideration
Balance at December 31, 2015
$
22,162

Contingent consideration payments paid in cash
(11,374
)
Contingent consideration payments paid in stock
(2,012
)
Change in fair value(1)
10,417

Reclass to Due to seller
402

Foreign exchange impact(2)
(312
)
 
 

Balance at December 31, 2016
19,283

Contingent consideration payments paid in cash
(15,345
)
Contingent consideration payments paid in stock
(4,678
)
Change in fair value(1)
677

Foreign exchange impact(2)
63

 
 
Balance at December 31, 2017
$

(1)
Adjustments to original contingent consideration obligations recorded were the result of using revised financial forecasts and updated fair value measurements, see note 3. These changes are recognized within operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
(2)
Changes in the contingent consideration liability which are caused by foreign exchange rate fluctuations are recognized in other comprehensive income.