XML 25 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurement
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement
 
ASC 820 includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy is based on observable or unobservable inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon its own market assumptions.
 
The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
 
Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs, which are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Inputs that are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable.

The Company's potential contingent consideration payments relating to acquisitions occurring subsequent to January 1, 2009 are its only Level 3 liabilities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The fair value of the liabilities determined by this analysis is primarily driven by the probability of reaching the performance measures required by the purchase agreements and the associated discount rates. Probabilities are estimated by reviewing financial forecasts and assessing the likelihood of reaching the required performance measures based on factors specific to each acquisition as well as the Company’s historical experience with similar arrangements. If an acquisition reaches the required performance measure, the estimated probability would be increased to 100% and reclassified to Due to seller, and if the measure is not reached, the probability would be reduced to reflect the amount earned, if any, depending on the terms of the agreement. Discount rates are estimated by using the local government bond yields plus the Company’s credit spread. A one percentage point increase in the discount rate across all contingent consideration liabilities would result in a decrease to the fair value of approximately $0.2 million.
 
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the basis of measurement at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
At June 30, 2016
 
Total Fair Value Measurement
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Money market funds(1)
 
$


$


$


$

Liabilities:
 











Contingent consideration
 
$
(18,560
)

$


$


$
(18,560
)
  

At December 31, 2015
 
Total Fair Value Measurement
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Money market funds(1)
 
$
667


$
667


$


$

Liabilities:
 











Contingent consideration
 
$
(22,162
)

$


$


$
(22,162
)
(1)
Included in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands): 
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Contingent Consideration
Balance as of December 31, 2015
$
(22,162
)
Contingent consideration payments paid in cash
4,144

Change in fair value(1)
(9,187
)
Reclassification to Due to seller
8,124

Contingent consideration payments paid in stock
350

Foreign exchange impact(2)
171

Balance as of June 30, 2016
$
(18,560
)
(1)
Adjustments to original contingent consideration obligations recorded were the result of using revised financial forecasts and updated fair value measurements. These changes are recognized within operating expenses on the condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss).
(2)
Changes in the contingent consideration liability which are caused by foreign exchange rate fluctuations are recognized in other comprehensive loss.