XML 29 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies and going concern (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Chaparral Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “we”, “our”, “us”, or the “Company”) are involved in the exploration, development, production, operation and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties. Our properties are located primarily in Oklahoma and our commodity products include crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids.

Interim financial statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and do not include all of the financial information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The financial information as of June 30, 2020, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, is unaudited. The financial information as of December 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. In management’s opinion, such information contains all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that will be realized for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements to conform to current period presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on our previously reported results of operations.

Cash and cash equivalents

We maintain cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts and money market funds which may not be federally insured. As of June 30, 2020, cash with a recorded balance totaling approximately $55,445 was held at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on such accounts.

Accounts receivable

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016–13, Financial Instruments–Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016–13”), which changes the recognition model for the impairment of financial instruments, including accounts receivable, loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, among others. We adopted ASU 2016–13 using the modified retrospective method effective January 1, 2020. In contrast to previous guidance, which considered current information and events, and only recognized losses when they became probable (an “incurred loss” model), ASU 2016–13 mandates an “expected loss” model. The expected loss model: (i) estimates the risk of loss even when risk is remote, (ii) estimates losses over the contractual life, (iii) considers past events, current conditions and reasonable supported forecasts and (iv) has no recognition threshold. ASU 2016–13 is applicable to our accounts receivable portfolio, particularly those receivables attributable to our joint interest partners which have a higher credit risk than those associated with our traditional customer receivables.

Basis of accounting. Our accounts receivable are carried at gross cost, representing amounts due, less an allowance for expected credit losses. We write off accounts receivable when they are determined to be uncollectible. When we recover amounts that were previously written off, those amounts are offset against the allowance and reduce expense in the year of recovery.

The Company has four portfolio segments constituting its total accounts receivables: (i) joint interest receivables; (ii) commodity sales receivables; (iii) derivative settlement receivables and (iv) other receivables. The table below discloses balances related to these four segments and the allowance:

Oil and natural gas properties

Capitalized Costs. We use the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties and activities. Accordingly, we capitalize all costs incurred in connection with the exploration for and development of oil and natural gas reserves. Proceeds from the disposition of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as a reduction in capitalized costs, with no gain or loss generally recognized unless such dispositions involve a significant alteration in the depletion rate. We capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with exploration and development activities, but do not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Capitalized costs include geological and geophysical work, 3D seismic, delay rentals, and drilling completing and equipping oil and natural gas wells, including salaries, benefits, and other internal costs directly attributable to these activities.

Costs associated with unevaluated oil and natural gas properties are excluded from the amortizable base until a determination has been made as to the existence of proved reserves. Quarterly, unevaluated leasehold costs are transferred to the amortization base with the costs of drilling the related well upon proving up reserves of a successful well or upon determination of a dry or uneconomic well. Furthermore, unevaluated oil and natural gas properties are reviewed for impairment if events and circumstances exist that indicate a possible decline in the recoverability of the carrying amount of such property. The impairment assessment is conducted at least once annually and whenever there are indicators that impairment has occurred. In assessing whether impairment has occurred, we consider factors such as intent to drill; remaining lease term; geological and geophysical evaluations; drilling results and activity; assignment of proved reserves; and economic viability of development if proved reserves are assigned. Upon determination of impairment, all or a portion of the associated leasehold costs are transferred to the full cost pool and become subject to amortization. The processes above are applied to unevaluated oil and natural gas properties on an individual basis or as a group if properties are individually insignificant. Our future depreciation, depletion and amortization rate would increase or we may incur ceiling test write-downs if costs are transferred to the amortization base without any associated reserves.

In the past, the costs associated with unevaluated properties typically related to acquisition costs of unproved acreage. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting on the Prior Effective Date in 2017, a substantial portion of the carrying value of our unevaluated properties are the result of a fair value increase to reflect the value of our acreage in our Focus Areas.

Ceiling Test. In accordance with the full cost method of accounting, the net capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties are not to exceed their related PV-10 value, net of tax considerations, plus the cost of unproved properties not being amortized.

Our estimates of oil and natural gas reserves as of June 30, 2020, and the related PV-10 value, were prepared using an average price for oil and natural gas on the first day of each month for the prior twelve months as required by the SEC. These losses are reflected in “Impairment of oil and gas assets” in our consolidated statements of operations. The ceiling test impairment we recorded in the current year was driven in part by our impairment of unevaluated leasehold in the amount $216,173 and $218,741 for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2020, respectively. Impairments of leasehold result in a transfer of amounts from unevaluated oil and natural gas properties to the full cost amortization base subsequently impacting the ceiling test.


	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2020	2019		2020		2019
Impairment of oil and gas assets	384,639	$	63,593	$	456,010	$	113,315

Producer imbalances. We recognize revenue on all natural gas sold to our customers regardless of our proportionate working interest in a well. Liabilities are recorded for imbalances greater than our proportionate share of remaining estimated natural gas reserves. Our aggregate imbalance positions at June 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, were immaterial.

Income taxes

On March 27, 2020, the President of the U.S. signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act. The CARES Act provides relief to corporate taxpayers by permitting a five-year carryback of 2018-2020 net operating losses (“NOLs”), removing the 80% limitation on the carryback of those NOLs, increasing the Section 163(j) 30% limitation on interest expense deductibility to 50% of adjusted taxable income for 2019 and 2020, and accelerates refunds for minimum tax credit carryforwards, along with a few other provisions. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, no material adjustments were made to provision amounts recorded as a result of the enactment of the CARES Act.

The provision for income taxes is based on a current estimate of the annual effective income tax rate adjusted to reflect the impact of permanent differences and discrete items. Management judgment is required in estimating operating income in order to determine our effective income tax rate. The consistent effective tax rate, as disclosed below, is a result of maintaining a valuation allowance against substantially all of our net deferred tax asset.


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Effective income tax rate	0.0	%	0.0	%	0.0	%	0.0	%

Despite the Company’s net loss for the six month period ended June 30, 2020, we did not record any net deferred tax benefit due to the Company’s projected taxable loss for the year ending December 31, 2020. Nor did the Company record a net deferred tax benefit, as any deferred tax asset arising from the benefit is reduced by a valuation allowance as utilization of the loss carryforwards and realization of other deferred tax assets cannot be reasonably assured.

A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, including NOLs, is recognized when it is more likely than not that some or all of the benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be realized. To assess that likelihood, we use estimates and judgment regarding our future taxable income, as well as the jurisdiction in which such taxable income is generated, to determine whether a valuation allowance is

required. Such evidence can include our current financial position, our results of operations, both actual and forecasted, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and tax planning strategies as well as the current and forecasted business economics of our industry.

We will continue to evaluate whether the valuation allowance is needed in future reporting periods. The valuation allowance will remain until we can determine that the net deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized. Future events or new evidence which may lead us to conclude that it is more likely than not that some or all of our net deferred tax assets will be realized include, but are not limited to, cumulative historical pre-tax earnings, improvements in oil prices, and taxable events that could result from one or more transactions. The valuation allowance does not prevent future utilization of the tax attributes if we recognize taxable income. As long as we conclude that the valuation allowance against our net deferred tax asset is necessary, we likely will not have any additional deferred income tax expense or benefit.

The benefit of an uncertain tax position taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return is recognized in the consolidated financial statements at the largest amount that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority. Interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions would be recorded in interest expense and other expense, respectively. There were no uncertain tax positions at June 30, 2020, or December 31, 2019.

As a result of the Prior Reorganization Plan and related transactions, the Company experienced an ownership change within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 382 on the Prior Effective Date. This ownership change subjected certain of the Company’s tax attributes, including $760,067 of federal net operating loss carryforwards, to an IRC Section 382 limitation. This limitation has not resulted in a current tax liability for the six month period ended June 30, 2020, or any intervening period since the Prior Effective Date. Since the Prior Effective Date ownership change, the Company has generated additional NOLs and other tax attributes that are not currently subject to an IRC Section 382 limitation. The Company’s ability to use NOLs and other tax attributes to reduce taxable income and income taxes could be materially impacted by a future IRC 382 ownership change. Future transactions involving the Company’s stock, including those outside of the Company’s control, could cause an IRC 382 ownership change resulting in a limitation on tax attributes currently not limited and a more restrictive limitation on tax attributes currently subject to the previous IRC 382 limitation.

Reorganization items

Reorganization items reflect, where applicable, expenses, gains and losses incurred that are incremental and a direct result of the reorganization of the business resulting from the Prior Chapter 11 Cases and Prior Reorganization Plan. The reorganization items disclosed in our consolidated statement of operations consist of professional fees for continuing legal work to resolve outstanding claims and fees to the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee, which we will continue to incur until both the Prior Chapter 11 Cases and the Chapter 11 Cases are closed.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

Recently issued accounting pronouncementsIn December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. This standard eliminates certain exceptions in the existing guidance related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period, and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance also clarifies certain aspects of the existing guidance, among other things. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020 and shall be applied on either a prospective basis, a retrospective basis for all periods presented, or a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings depending on which aspects of the new standard are applicable to an entity. The Company is in the process of evaluating the new standard and is unable to estimate its financial impact, if any, at this time.