XML 43 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Nature Of Operations And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies
Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies
Nature of operations
Chaparral Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries, (collectively, “we”, “our”, “us”, or the “Company”) are involved in the acquisition, exploration, development, production and operation of oil and natural gas properties. Properties are located primarily in Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Kansas.
Interim financial statements
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and do not include all of the financial information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The financial information as of September 30, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, is unaudited. In management’s opinion, such information contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that will be realized for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Cash and cash equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We maintain cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts and money market funds which may not be federally insured. As of September 30, 2012, cash with a recorded balance totaling $29,943 was held at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on such accounts.
Accounts receivable
We have receivables from joint interest owners and oil and natural gas purchasers which are generally uncollateralized. We generally review our oil and natural gas purchasers for credit worthiness and general financial condition. We may have the ability to withhold future revenue disbursements to recover non-payment of joint interest billings on properties of which we are the operator. Accounts receivable from joint interest owners are stated at amounts due, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are generally due within 30 days and accounts outstanding longer than 60 days are considered past due. We determine our allowance by considering the length of time past due, previous loss history, future net revenues of the debtor’s ownership interest in oil and natural gas properties we operate, and the owner’s ability to pay its obligation, among other things.
We write off accounts receivable when they are determined to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable consisted of the following at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011: 
 
September 30,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
Joint interests
$
23,006

 
$
16,926

Accrued oil and natural gas sales
51,419

 
47,667

Derivative settlements
5,678

 
449

Other
417

 
380

Allowance for doubtful accounts
(1,070
)
 
(634
)
 
$
79,450

 
$
64,788


Inventories
Inventories are comprised of equipment used in developing oil and natural gas properties and oil and natural gas production inventories. Equipment inventory is carried at the lower of cost or market using the average cost method. Oil and natural gas product inventories are stated at the lower of production cost or market. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record provisions for excess or obsolete inventory, if necessary. Inventories at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following: 
 
September 30,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
Equipment inventory
$
10,769

 
$
6,164

Oil and natural gas product
3,334

 
3,793

Inventory valuation allowance
(863
)
 
(1,316
)
 
$
13,240

 
$
8,641


Oil and natural gas properties
We use the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties and activities. Accordingly, we capitalize all costs incurred in connection with the exploration for and development of oil and natural gas reserves. Proceeds from the disposition of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as a reduction in capitalized costs, with no gain or loss generally recognized unless such dispositions involve a significant alteration in the depletion rate. We capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with exploration and development activities, but do not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Capitalized costs include geological and geophysical work, 3D seismic, delay rentals, drilling and completing and equipping oil and natural gas wells, including salaries, benefits and other internal costs directly attributable to these activities.
The costs of unevaluated oil and natural gas properties are excluded from amortization until the properties are evaluated. Costs are transferred into the amortization base on an ongoing basis as the properties are evaluated and proved reserves are established or impairment is determined. As of September 30, 2012, work in progress costs are included in unevaluated oil and natural gas properties since there are no reserves allocated to these properties. Costs not subject to amortization as of September 30, 2012 included $59,265 of capital costs incurred for undeveloped acreage, $44,802 for the construction of CO2 delivery pipelines and $30,321 for wells and facilities in progress pending determination. As of December 31, 2011, costs not subject to amortization consisted of capital costs incurred for undeveloped acreage of $22,831.
In accordance with the full cost method of accounting, the net capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties are not to exceed their related estimated future net revenues discounted at 10% (“PV-10 value”), net of tax considerations, plus the cost of unproved properties not being amortized. The PV-10 value of our reserves as of September 30, 2012 was estimated based on average first day of the month prices of $94.98 per Bbl of oil and $2.82 per Mcf of gas for the twelve months ended September 30, 2012. The cost center ceiling exceeded the net capitalized cost of our oil and natural gas properties as of September 30, 2012, and no impairment was necessary. A decline in oil and natural gas prices subsequent to September 30, 2012 could result in ceiling test write downs in future periods. The amount of any future impairment is difficult to predict, and will depend on the average oil and natural gas prices during each period, the incremental proved reserves added during each period, and additional capital spent.
Stock-based compensation
Our stock-based compensation programs consist of phantom stock, restricted stock units (“RSU”), and restricted stock awards issued to employees.
Generally, we use new shares to grant restricted stock awards, and we cancel restricted shares forfeited or repurchased for tax withholding. Canceled shares are available to be issued as new grants under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
The estimated fair value of the phantom stock and RSU awards is remeasured at the end of each reporting period until settlement. The estimated fair market value of these awards is calculated based on our total asset value less total liabilities, with both assets and liabilities being adjusted to fair value in accordance with the terms of the Phantom Stock Plan and the Non-Officer Restricted Stock Unit Plan. The primary adjustment required is the adjustment of oil and natural gas properties from net book value to the discounted and risk-adjusted reserve value based on internal reserve reports priced on NYMEX forward strips. Compensation cost associated with the phantom stock and RSU awards is recognized over the vesting period using the straight-line method and the accelerated method, respectively.
The fair value of our restricted stock awards that include a service condition is based upon the estimated fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and is remeasured at the end of each reporting period until settlement. We recognize compensation cost over the requisite service period using the accelerated method for awards with graded vesting.
We use a Monte Carlo model to estimate the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that include a market condition. This model includes various significant assumptions, including the expected volatility of the share awards and the probabilities of certain vesting conditions. These assumptions reflect our best estimates, but they involve inherent uncertainties based on market conditions generally outside of our control. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, stock-based compensation expense could have been significantly impacted. Compensation cost associated with restricted stock awards that include a market condition is recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method.
Deferred income taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided for significant carryforwards and temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are determined by applying the presently enacted tax rates and laws. We record a valuation allowance for the amount of net deferred tax assets when, in management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.
Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient future taxable income. Although realization is not assured, we believe it is more likely than not that our net recognized deferred tax assets will be realized. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near-term if estimates of future taxable income are reduced.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded an increase in the valuation allowance of $0 and $3,110, respectively, for state NOL carryforwards we do not expect to realize before they expire.
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance that clarifies the application of fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and changes particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and we adopted it effective January 1, 2012. There was no significant impact on our consolidated financial statements other than additional disclosures.
In June 2011, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance that requires entities that report other comprehensive income to present the components of net income and comprehensive income in either one continuous financial statement or two consecutive financial statements. It does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and we applied it retrospectively beginning on January 1, 2012. We have elected to present the components of net income and comprehensive income in two consecutive financial statements.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In July 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding how health insurers should recognize and classify in their income statements the fees mandated by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (“HCERA”). The HCERA imposes an annual fee upon health insurers for each calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The annual fee will be allocated to individual entities providing health insurance to employees based on a ratio, as provided for in the HCERA, and is not tax deductible. This guidance specifies that once the entity has provided qualifying health insurance in the calendar year in which the fee is payable, the liability for the entity’s fee should be estimated and recorded in full with a corresponding deferred cost that is amortized to expense on a straight line basis, unless another method better allocates the fee over the calendar year that it is payable. This guidance is effective for calendar years beginning after December 15, 2013, once the fee is instituted. We are currently assessing the impact that this fee and the adoption of the related authoritative guidance will have on our financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires enhanced disclosures that will enable financial statement users to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial position. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and should be applied retrospectively. We do not expect this guidance to have an impact on our consolidated financial statements other than additional disclosures.