QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
|
|
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
CMG HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Nevada
|
87-0733770
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
333 Hudson Street, Suite 303
|
||
New York, New York
|
10013
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
Large accelerated filer
|
Accelerated filer
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
As of May 20, 2013, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting and none-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately: $2,760,278 at $0.01 price per share, based on the closing price on the OTC Pink Sheets. As of May 20, 2013, there were 294,650,743 shares of common stock of the registrant issued and 294,650,743 outstanding.
|
101.INS
|
XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENTS
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE
|
CMG HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: September 3 , 2013
|
By: /s/ JEFFREY DEVLIN
|
Jeffrey Devlin
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
SIGNATURE
|
NAME
|
TITLE
|
DATE
|
|||
/s/Jeffrey Devlin
|
Jeffrey Devlin
|
CEO, CFO & Chairman of the Board
|
September 3 , 2013
|
|||
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation | NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of CMG Holdings Group, Inc. (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes contained in its 2012 annual report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, these interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Our future results of operations may change materially from the historical results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements. The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the historical audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes of the Company and managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in the Companys Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K. Notes to the financial statements that would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for fiscal year 2012, as reported in the Form 10-K, have been omitted. Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CMG Holdings Group, Inc., CMG Acquisition, Inc., CMGO Capital, Inc., XA The Experiential Agency, Inc., CMGO Logistics, Inc., USaveCT and USaveNJ, after elimination of all significant inter-company accounts and transactions.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC 820 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of ASC 820 were effective January 1, 2008. ASC 820 delays the effective date for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement).
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by ASC 820 are as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.
Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and collars.
Level 3 Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in managements best estimate of fair value.
The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. As required by ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities, regarding marketable securities. The Company invests in securities that are intended to be bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term, and as a result, classifies such investments as trading securities. Trading securities are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with changes in fair value being reflected as unrealized gains or losses in the current period. In addition, the Company classifies the cash flows from purchases, sales, and maturities of trading securities as cash flows from operating activities.
Details of the Company's marketable trading securities as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Discontinued Operations
In accordance with ASC 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements Discontinued Operations, we reported the results of our subsidiary, AudioEye Inc., as a discontinued operation. The application of ASC 205-20 is discussed in Note 2 below. |
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation: Fair Value Measurements (Policies)
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC 820 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of ASC 820 were effective January 1, 2008. ASC 820 delays the effective date for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement).
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by ASC 820 are as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.
Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and collars.
Level 3 Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in managements best estimate of fair value.
The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. As required by ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
|
Note 3 - Derivative Liabilities
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note 3 - Derivative Liabilities | NOTE 4 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
The Company has various convertible instruments outstanding more fully described in Note 2. Because the number of shares to be issued upon settlement cannot be determined under these instruments, the Company cannot determine whether it will have sufficient authorized shares at a given date to settle any other of its share-settleable instruments. As a result, under ASC 815-15 Derivatives and Hedging, all other share-settleable instruments must be classified as liabilities.
Embedded Derivative Liabilities in Convertible Notes
During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized new derivative liabilities of $65,597 and $734,839, respectively, as a result of new convertible debt issuances. The Company recognized $29,690 as a loss on derivatives and $97,658 as a gain on derivatives due to change in fair value of the liability for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The fair value of the Companys embedded derivative liabilities was $241,257 and $133,963 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
Warrants
During the fiscal year 2011, 899,000 A Warrants and 899,000 B warrants were issued to individuals. The Company determined that the instruments embedded in the warrants should be classified as liabilities. Under ASC 815-15 Derivatives and Hedging the liabilities were subsequently measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. The fair value of all outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $5,935 and $12,007, respectively. The Company recognized $6,072 and $4,532 as gain on derivative related to the warrants for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The following table summarizes the derivative liabilities included in the consolidated balance sheet:
Derivative Liabilities
The following table summarizes the derivative gain or loss recorded as a result of the derivative liabilities above:
Gain/(Loss) on Derivative Liability
The Company values its warrant derivatives and all other share settable instrument using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumption used include (1) 0.01% to 1.96% risk-free interest rate, (2) life is the remaining contractual life of the instrument (3) expected volatility 71% to 426%, (4) zero expected dividends, (5) exercise price as set forth in the agreements, (6) common stock price of the underlying share on the valuation date, and (7) number of shares to be issued if the instrument is converted. |
Note 6 - Subsequent Events
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|
Notes | |
Note 6 - Subsequent Events | NOTE 6 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
During August 2013, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement and Release (the Agreement) with Continental Investments Group (Continental), the holder of a $85,000 convertible note payable of the Company and the holder of 2,500,000 shares of restricted common stock. The Agreement calls for the termination and cancellation of a Sale and Purchase agreement, whereby the Company agreed to issue 50,000 Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for 20,000 cartoon animated Cels. The Agreement also calls for the cancellation of the $85,000 convertible note and related interest and the Continental to return the 2,500,000 shares of restricted common stock. |
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation: Discontinued Operations (Policies)
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|
Policies | |
Discontinued Operations | Discontinued Operations
In accordance with ASC 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements Discontinued Operations, we reported the results of our subsidiary, AudioEye Inc., as a discontinued operation. The application of ASC 205-20 is discussed in Note 2 below. |
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation: Principles of Consolidation (Policies)
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|
Policies | |
Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CMG Holdings Group, Inc., CMG Acquisition, Inc., CMGO Capital, Inc., XA The Experiential Agency, Inc., CMGO Logistics, Inc., USaveCT and USaveNJ, after elimination of all significant inter-company accounts and transactions. |