XML 35 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Values (Tables)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments on Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value

 

     As at  
     March 31, 2013     December 30, 2012  
     Notional
value
     Fair value
hierarchy
     Fair value
asset
(liability) 
(1)
    Notional
value
     Fair value
hierarchy
     Fair value
asset
(liability)
(1)
 

Derivatives:

                

Forward currency contracts(2)

   $ 165,318         Level 2       $ 2,009      $ 195,081         Level 2       $ (2,014 ) 

Interest rate swap(3)

     33,750         Level 2         (482 )      0         Level 2         0   

Total return swaps (“TRS”)(4 )

     41,403         Level 2         14,257        41,403         Level 2         7,504   
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total Derivatives

   $ 240,471          $ 15,784      $ 236,484          $ 5,490   
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

(1) 

The Company values its derivatives using valuations that are calibrated to the initial trade prices. Subsequent valuations are based on observable inputs to the valuation model.

(2) 

The fair value of forward currency contracts is determined using prevailing exchange rates.

(3) 

In February 2013, the Tim Hortons Advertising and Promotion Fund (Canada) Inc. (“Ad Fund”) entered into an amortizing interest rate swap to fix a portion of the interest expense on its term debt. The fair value is estimated using discounted cash flows and market-based observable inputs, including interest rate yield curves and discount rates.

(4) 

The fair value of the TRS is determined using the Company’s closing common share price on the last business day of the fiscal period, as quoted on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”).

Fair Value and Carrying Value of Other Financial Assets and Liabilities

The following table summarizes the fair value and carrying value of other financial assets and liabilities that are not recognized at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:

 

     As at  
     March 31, 2013     December 30, 2012  
     Fair value
hierarchy
     Fair value
asset
(liability)
    Carrying
value
    Fair value
hierarchy
     Fair value
asset
(liability)
    Carrying
value
 

Cash and cash equivalents(1)

     Level 1       $ 74,641      $ 74,641        Level 1       $ 120,139      $ 120,139   

Restricted cash and cash equivalents(1)

     Level 1         104,021        104,021        Level 1         150,574        150,574   

Bearer deposit notes(2)

     Level 2         41,403        41,403        Level 2         41,403        41,403   

Notes receivable, net(3)

     Level 3         11,604        11,604        Level 3         8,777        8,777   

Senior unsecured notes, series 1(4)

     Level 2         (325,725 )      (301,457 )      Level 2         (325,857 )      (301,544 ) 

Advertising fund term debt(5)

     Level 3         (54,482 )      (54,482 )      Level 3         (56,500 )      (56,500 ) 

Other debt(6)

     Level 3         (123,286 )      (59,223 )      Level 3         (125,000 )      (60,223 ) 

 

(1) 

The carrying values approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these investments.

(2) 

The Company holds these notes as collateral to reduce the carrying costs of the TRS. The interest rate on these notes resets every 90 days; therefore, the fair value of these notes, using a market approach, approximates the carrying value.

(3) 

Management estimates the current value, using a cost approach, based primarily on the estimated depreciated replacement cost of the underlying equipment held as collateral.

(4) 

The fair value of the senior unsecured notes, using a market approach, is based on publicly disclosed trades between arm’s length institutions as documented on Bloomberg LP.

(5) 

Management estimates the fair value of this variable rate debt using a market approach, based on prevailing interest rates plus an applicable margin.

(6) 

Management estimates the fair value of its Other debt, primarily consisting of contributions received related to the construction costs of certain restaurants, using an income approach, by discounting future cash flows using a Company risk-adjusted rate, over the remaining term of the debt.