XML 33 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

8.         FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The following table summarizes the ARLP Partnership's fair value measurements within the hierarchy not included elsewhere in these notes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Measured on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

9,700

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

10,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional disclosures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 —

 

 

559,509

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

819,099

 

 

 —

 

Total

 

$

 —

 

$

559,509

 

$

9,700

 

$

 —

 

$

819,099

 

$

10,400

 

 

See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Fair Value Measurements for more information regarding fair value hierarchy levels.

 

The carrying amounts for cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, due from affiliates and due to affiliates approximate fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments.

 

The estimated fair value of the ARLP Partnership's long-term debt, including current maturities, is based on interest rates that we believe are currently available to the ARLP Partnership in active markets for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities (See Note 7 – Long-Term Debt).  The fair value of debt, which is based upon these interest rates, is classified as a Level 2 measurement under the fair value hierarchy.

 

The estimated fair value of the ARLP Partnership's contingent consideration arrangement is based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The assumptions in the model include a risk-adjusted discount rate, forward coal sale price curves, cost of debt and probabilities of meeting certain contractual threshold coal sales prices (See Note 3 – Acquisitions).  The decrease in fair value was primarily a result of changes in the market risk adjustment and risk-adjusted discount rate and is recorded in Operating expenses (excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization) in our consolidated income statement.  The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in active markets and thus represents a Level 3 fair value measurement under the fair value hierarchy.