XML 22 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

For collaboration agreements, revenues for non-refundable upfront license fee payments, where we continue to have performance obligations, are recognized as performance occurs and obligations are completed. Revenues for non-refundable upfront license fee payments where we do not have significant future performance obligations are recognized when the agreement is signed and the payments are due.

For multiple element arrangements, such as collaboration agreements in which a collaborator may purchase several deliverables, we account for each deliverable as a separate unit of accounting if both of the following criteria are met: (i) the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a standalone basis; and (ii) for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. We evaluate how the consideration should be allocated among the units of accounting and allocate revenue to each non-contingent element based upon the relative selling price of each element. We determine the relative selling price for each deliverable using (i) vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of selling price if it exists; (ii) third-party evidence, or TPE, of selling price if it exists; or (iii) our best estimated selling price for that deliverable if neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exists for that deliverable. We then recognize the revenue allocated to each element when the four basic revenue criteria described above are met for each element.

For milestone payments received in connection with our collaboration agreements, we have elected to adopt the milestone method of accounting under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 605-28, Milestone Method. Under the milestone method, revenues for payments which meet the definition of a milestone will be recognized as the respective milestones are achieved.

We recognize product revenue as follows:

 

·

Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement. We currently sell product through a license and supply agreement with our collaborator, Ferrer. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is generally determined by the receipt of an approved purchase order from the collaborator in connection with the terms of the license and supply agreement.

 

·

Delivery. Typically, ownership of the product passes to the collaborator upon shipment. Our current license and supply agreement also provides Ferrer with an acceptance period during which they may reject any product which does not conform to agreed-upon specifications. Because ADASUVE is a new product, a new technology and our first product to be commercialized, and because we do not have a history of producing product to collaborator specifications, we will not consider delivery to have occurred until after the collaborator acceptance period has ended or the collaborator has positively accepted the product. Once we have demonstrated over the course of time an ability to reliably produce the product to collaborator specifications, we will consider delivery to have occurred upon shipment in the absence of any other relevant shipment or acceptance terms.

 

·

Sales Price Fixed or Determinable. Sales prices for product shipments are determined by the license and supply agreement and documented in the purchase orders. After the collaborator acceptance period has ended or the collaborator has positively accepted the product, our collaborator does not have any product return or replacement rights, including for expired products.

 

·

Collectability. Payment for the product is contractually obligated under the license and supply agreement. We will monitor payment histories for our collaborator and specific issues as they arise to determine whether collection is probable for a specific transaction and defer revenue as necessary.

Royalty revenue from our collaboration agreement will be recognized as we receive information from our collaborator regarding product sales and collectability is reasonably assured.

Significant management judgment is used in the determination of revenue to be recognized and the period in which it is recognized.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at standard cost, which approximates actual cost, determined on a first-in first-out basis, not in excess of market value. Inventory includes the direct costs incurred to manufacture products combined with allocated manufacturing overhead, which consists of indirect costs, including labor and facility overhead. The carrying cost of inventory is reduced so as to not be in excess of the market value of the inventory as determined by the contractual transfer prices to Ferrer and Teva. The excess over the market value is expensed to cost of goods sold. If information becomes available that suggests that all or certain of the inventory may not be realizable, we may be required to expense a portion, or all, of the capitalized inventory into cost of goods sold.

We have fulfilled all of the orders we received from Teva and Ferrer for commercial units of ADASUVE for the near and medium term. As a result, we have suspended our commercial production operations (Refer to Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and there is no certainty as to when we will resume ADASUVE commercial production or if we can secure additional resources to fund our future operations.

In February 2016, we reacquired the ADASUVE commercial U.S. rights under the Teva Amendment through an exclusive, royalty-free sub-license arrangement in exchange for the termination of all future milestone and royalty obligations that Teva had under the original agreement. As part of this exchange, all remaining ADASUVE inventory held by Teva was transferred to us along with a right to resell such inventory for up to one year. The Teva Amendment is intended to allow us to continue to provide ADASUVE product to patients and health care providers either on our own or through another unaffiliated partner, at which time the all Teva license rights to ADASUVE would terminate. We accounted for the sub-license rights and the receipt of inventory under ASC 845, Nonmonetary Transaction. We concluded that the cost of the inventory transferred to us shall be based on the fair value of the inventory received as its fair value is more clearly evident than the fair value of the future milestone and royalty obligations relinquished. The fair value of the inventory received was determined to be $945,000 with an offsetting gain on exchange that is reflected as a non-operating line item within our consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. However, given our continued operating losses, the uncertainty of when we will resume commercial production, the limited ability to sell the inventory, the twelve-month expiration of this inventory, and our ability to continue as a going concern, we subsequently fully impaired the inventory we received by recording a $945,000, or $0.05 per share, impairment charge that was included in our cost of goods sold within our consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Our inventory was fully reserved as of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016.

Contingencies

From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits, arbitrations, claims, investigations and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. We make provisions for liabilities when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. No such provisions have been made for the periods presented herein. Litigation and related matters are inherently unpredictable. If any unfavorable ruling were to occur in any specific period, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations of that period or on our cash flows and liquidity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued the Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 requires management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. In doing so, companies will have reduced diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures than under the current guidance. Refer to Note 2 – Need to Raise Additional Capital regarding our discussion on our ability to continue as a going concern.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued the ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under US GAAP. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard will be effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities can choose to apply the standard using either the full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. Entities electing the full retrospective adoption will apply the standard to each period presented in the financial statements. This means that entities will have to apply the new guidance as if it had been in effect since the inception of all its contracts with customers presented in the financial statements. Entities that elect the modified retrospective approach will apply the guidance retrospectively only to the most current period presented in the financial statements. This means that entities will have to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at the date of initial application. The new revenue standard will be applied to contracts that are in progress at the date of initial application.

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. This guidance has no material impact on the results of our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We have presented our financing obligations net of the related debt issuance costs as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2015-14, which delays the effective date of the standard for one year to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are evaluating the requirements of this guidance and have not yet determined the impact of its adoption on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) - and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee, which will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. We are evaluating the requirements of this guidance and have not yet determined the impact of its adoption on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.