XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
3 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

3.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We perform fair value measurements in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurement. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at their fair values, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the assets or liabilities, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of nonperformance.

ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. An asset’s or a liability’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1:  quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2:  inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or

 

Level 3:  unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair values of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, consisted of the following (Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are defined above):

 

 

 

August 31, 2016

 

 

May 31, 2016

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

Using Input Types

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

Using Input Types

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

4,251

 

 

$

 

 

$

4,251

 

 

$

3,750

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,750

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

 

 

 

214

 

Commercial paper debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

8,339

 

 

 

8,339

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,155

 

 

 

2,155

 

Corporate debt securities and other

 

 

166

 

 

 

36,656

 

 

 

36,822

 

 

 

179

 

 

 

35,095

 

 

 

35,274

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

122

 

Total assets

 

$

4,431

 

 

$

45,126

 

 

$

49,557

 

 

$

4,143

 

 

$

37,372

 

 

$

41,515

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

$

 

 

$

215

 

 

$

215

 

 

$

 

 

$

218

 

 

$

218

 

 

Our marketable securities investments consist of Tier 1 commercial paper debt securities, corporate debt securities and certain other securities. As of August 31, 2016 and May 31, 2016, approximately 37% and 28%, respectively, of our marketable securities investments mature within one year and 63% and 72%, respectively, mature within one to six years. Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of our marketable securities that were classified as Level 1 in the table above were derived from quoted market prices and active markets for these instruments exist. Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of Level 2 instruments listed in the table above, the counterparties to which have high credit ratings, were derived from the following: non-binding market consensus prices that were corroborated by observable market data, quoted market prices for similar instruments, or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow techniques, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data including LIBOR-based yield curves, among others.

Based on the trading prices of our $54.1 billion and $40.1 billion of borrowings, which consisted of senior notes and the related fair value hedges that were outstanding as of August 31, 2016 and May 31, 2016, respectively, the estimated fair values of our senior notes and the related fair value hedges using Level 2 inputs at August 31, 2016 and May 31, 2016 were $58.1 billion and $43.2 billion, respectively. As of May 31, 2016, the estimated fair value of our $3.8 billion of short-term borrowings approximated carrying value due to the short maturity of the borrowings.