XML 48 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
3 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2013
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

We perform fair value measurements in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at their fair values, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the assets or liabilities, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of nonperformance.

 

ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. An asset’s or a liability’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

·Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

·Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or

 

·Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair values of the assets or liabilities.

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

 

Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, consisted of the following (Level 1 and 2 inputs are defined above):

 

 

 

August 31, 2013

 

May 31, 2013

 

 

Fair Value Measurements
Using Input Types

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements
Using Input Types

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Total

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial paper debt securities

 

$

 —

 

$

      15,978

 

$

      15,978

 

$

 —

 

$

      14,043

 

$

      14,043

Corporate debt securities and other

 

 

           149

 

 

        7,771

 

 

        7,920

 

 

           246

 

 

        4,689

 

 

        4,935

Derivative financial instruments

 

 

 —

 

 

             35

 

 

             35

 

 

 —

 

 

             41

 

 

             41

Total assets

 

$

           149

 

$

      23,784

 

$

      23,933

 

$

           246

 

$

      18,773

 

$

      19,019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

$

 —

 

$

             15

 

$

             15

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

Our marketable securities investments consisted of Tier 1 commercial paper debt securities, corporate debt securities and certain other securities. As of August 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013, approximately 83% and 91%, respectively, of our marketable securities investments mature within one year and 17% and 9%, respectively, mature within one to four years. Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of our marketable securities that were classified as Level 1 in the table above were derived from quoted market prices and active markets for these instruments exist. Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of Level 2 instruments listed in the table above, the counterparties to which have high credit ratings, were derived from the following: non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated by observable market data, quoted market prices for similar instruments, or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow techniques, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data including LIBOR-based yield curves, among others.

 

Based on the trading prices of our $24.1 billion and $18.5 billion of borrowings, which consisted of senior notes that were outstanding as of August 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013, respectively, the estimated fair values of our borrowings using Level 2 inputs at August 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013 were $25.5 billion and $20.7 billion, respectively.