XML 20 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
May 31, 2011
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

4.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS 

We perform fair value measurements in accordance with the guidance provided by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at their fair values, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the assets or liabilities, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. An asset’s or liability’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

 

 

Level 1:    quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

 

 

Level 2:    inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or

 

 

 

Level 3:    unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair values of the assets or liabilities.

 

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, consisted of the following types of instruments (Level 1 and 2 inputs are defined above):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

May 31, 2011

 

  

May 31, 2010

 

 

  

Fair Value
Measurements

Using Input Types

 

  

 

 

  

Fair Value
Measurements

Using Input Types

 

  

 

 

(in millions)

  

Level 1

 

  

Level 2

 

  

Total

 

  

Level 1

 

  

Level 2

 

  

Total

 

Assets:

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Money market funds

  

$

3,362

  

  

$

  

  

$

3,362

  

  

$

2,423

  

  

$

  

  

$

2,423

  

U.S. Treasury, U.S. government and U.S. government agency debt securities

  

 

1,150

  

  

 

  

  

 

1,150

  

  

 

3,010

  

  

 

  

  

 

3,010

  

Commercial paper debt securities

  

 

  

  

 

11,884

  

  

 

11,884

  

  

 

  

  

 

3,378

  

  

 

3,378

  

Corporate debt securities and other

  

 

106

  

  

 

1,885

  

  

 

1,991

  

  

 

  

  

 

2,256

  

  

 

2,256

  

Derivative financial instruments

  

 

  

  

 

69

  

  

 

69

  

  

 

  

  

 

33

  

  

 

33

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  

$

4,618

  

  

$

13,838

  

  

$

18,456

  

  

$

5,433

  

  

$

5,667

  

  

$

11,100

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of our money market funds, U.S. Treasury, U.S. government and U.S. government agency debt securities and certain other marketable securities that were classified as Level 1 in the table above were derived from quoted market prices as substantially all of these instruments have maturity dates (if any) within one year from our date of purchase and active markets for these instruments exist. Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of all other instruments listed in the table above, generally all of which mature within one year and the counterparties to which have high credit ratings, were derived from the following: non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated by observable market data, quoted market prices for similar instruments, or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow techniques, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. Our discounted cash flow techniques used observable market inputs such as LIBOR-based yield curves, among others.

Our cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and derivative financial instruments are recognized and measured at fair value in our consolidated financial statements. Based on the trading prices of our $15.9 billion and $14.6 billion of borrowings, which consisted of short-term borrowings and senior notes that were outstanding at May 31, 2011 and senior notes and commercial paper notes that were outstanding as of May 31, 2010 and the interest rates we could obtain for other borrowings with similar terms at those dates, the estimated fair values of our borrowings at May 31, 2011 and May 31, 2010 were $17.4 billion and $15.9 billion, respectively.