New Accounting Standards (Policy)	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
New Accounting Standards [Abstract]
Impact of Adoption of Recent Accounting Standards and Accounting Standards to be Adopted	Impact of Adoption of Recent Accounting Standards The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) on January 1, 2019. ASU 2016-02 was issued to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the consolidated statements of income. ASU 2016-02 provides for a modified retrospective transition approach basis to record the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on financial statements. The modified retrospective transition approach allows the lessee to recognize and measure leases on the consolidated statements of financial condition at the beginning of either the earliest period presented or as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company elected to recognize and measure leases on the consolidated statements of financial condition at the beginning of the period of adoption presented in our financial statements, or January 1, 2019, and will not restate prior periods. Adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recognition of lease liabilities totaling $916,000 and the recognition of ROU assets totaling $904,000 as of the date of adoption. Lease liabilities and ROU assets are reflected in other liabilities and other assets, respectively. The initial gross up upon adoption was primarily related to operating leases of certain real estate properties. The Company has elected to apply the package of practical expedients allowed by the new standard under which the Company need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are leases or contain leases, the Company need not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing lease, and the Company need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The most significant effects of adoption relate to the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on our consolidated statements of financial condition for our two branch operating leases; and providing additional new disclosures about the Company’s leasing activities. The Company does not expect a significant change in its leasing activities due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings of $10,000. Refer to Note 5 for more information related to the adoption of ASU 2016-02. The Company adopted FASB ASU 2017-08, “Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20)” (“ASU 2017-08”) on January 1, 2019. ASU 2017-08 amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date. Under previous GAAP, entities generally amortized the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. ASU 2017-08 does not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The adoption of ASU 2017-08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations. Accounting Standards to be Adopted In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13). ASU 2016-13 requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model). Under the CECL model entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument (considering estimated prepayments, but not expected extensions or modifications unless reasonable expectation of a troubled debt restructuring exists) from the date of initial recognition of that instrument. Further, ASU 2016-13 made certain targeted amendments to the existing impairment standards for available for sale (“AFS”) debt securities. For an AFS debt security for which there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-not requirement to sell, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis. ASU 2016-13 is effective for public companies that are U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filers for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim reporting periods within those periods. An entity will apply the amendments in ASU 2016-13 through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company has determined its data requirements and is developing its methodologies for calculating the expected credit losses under the new guidance which has allowed the Company to run parallel loss reserve calculations. Data integrity associated with these methodologies is being reviewed and enhancements to the current process are being considered. We expect that the new guidance will result in an increase to the allowance for loan losses given that the allowance will be required to cover the full remaining expected life of the portfolio, rather than the incurred loss under the current accounting standard. The extent of this increase is still being evaluated. We are also reviewing the impact of additional disclosures required under ASU 2016-13 on our ongoing financial reporting procedures.

Impact of Adoption of Recent Accounting Standards

The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) on January 1, 2019. ASU 2016-02 was issued to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the consolidated statements of income. ASU 2016-02 provides for a modified retrospective transition approach basis to record the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on financial statements. The modified retrospective transition approach allows the lessee to recognize and measure leases on the consolidated statements of financial condition at the beginning of either the earliest period presented or as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company elected to recognize and measure leases on the consolidated statements of financial condition at the beginning of the period of adoption presented in our financial statements, or January 1, 2019, and will not restate prior periods. Adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recognition of lease liabilities totaling $916,000 and the recognition of ROU assets totaling $904,000 as of the date of adoption. Lease liabilities and ROU assets are reflected in other liabilities and other assets, respectively. The initial gross up upon adoption was primarily related to operating leases of certain real estate properties. The Company has elected to apply the package of practical expedients allowed by the new standard under which the Company need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are leases or contain leases, the Company need not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing lease, and the Company need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The most significant effects of adoption relate to the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on our consolidated statements of financial condition for our two branch operating leases; and providing additional new disclosures about the Company’s leasing activities. The Company does not expect a significant change in its leasing activities due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings of $10,000. Refer to Note 5 for more information related to the adoption of ASU 2016-02.

The Company adopted FASB ASU 2017-08, “Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20)” (“ASU 2017-08”) on January 1, 2019. ASU 2017-08 amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date. Under previous GAAP, entities generally amortized the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. ASU 2017-08 does not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The adoption of ASU 2017-08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

Accounting Standards to be Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13). ASU 2016-13 requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model). Under the CECL model entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument (considering estimated prepayments, but not expected extensions or modifications unless reasonable expectation of a troubled debt restructuring exists) from the date of initial recognition of that instrument. Further, ASU 2016-13 made certain targeted amendments to the existing impairment standards for available for sale (“AFS”) debt securities. For an AFS debt security for which there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-not requirement to sell, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis. ASU 2016-13 is effective for public companies that are U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filers for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim reporting periods within those periods. An entity will apply the amendments in ASU 2016-13 through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company has determined its data requirements and is developing its methodologies for calculating the expected credit losses under the new guidance which has allowed the Company to run parallel loss reserve calculations. Data integrity associated with these methodologies is being reviewed and enhancements to the current process are being considered. We expect that the new guidance will result in an increase to the allowance for loan losses given that the allowance will be required to cover the full remaining expected life of the portfolio, rather than the incurred loss under the current accounting standard. The extent of this increase is still being evaluated. We are also reviewing the impact of additional disclosures required under ASU 2016-13 on our ongoing financial reporting procedures.