XML 73 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Financial Instruments and Concentration of Risk
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Derivative Instrument Detail [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments and Concentration of Risk
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CONCENTRATION OF RISK
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of December 31 are as follows: 
 
2013
2012
(Dollars in thousands)
CARRYING
AMOUNT

FAIR
VALUE

CARRYING
AMOUNT

FAIR
VALUE

Cash and short-term investments (Level 1)
$
57,837

$
57,837

$
80,062

$
80,062

Net derivative asset related to interest rate swaps (Level 2)
1,830

1,830

2,952

2,952

Long-term debt (including current installments on long-term debt and fair value adjustments related to fair value swaps) (Level 2)
320,092

347,869

357,576

379,048


A framework has been established for measuring fair value, which provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below.
Level 1
Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2
Inputs to the valuation methodology include:
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and
Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level 2 input must be observed for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3
Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
For cash and short-term investments, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was determined using discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate forward curves. The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based upon the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt issues. Long-term debt for which there is no quoted market price, fair value is estimated based on average market prices for comparable liquid revenue bonds.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
We record all derivatives on our balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge.
We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions.
FAIR VALUE HEDGES OF INTEREST RATE RISK
As of December 31, 2013, we had six separate interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $46.75 million associated with our $22.5 million debentures and $24.25 million of our medium-term notes. The swaps convert interest payments with fixed rates ranging between 6.95% and 8.89% to a variable rate of 3-month LIBOR plus a spread between 4.738% and 6.518%. The interest rate swaps terminate at various dates between December 2015 and February 2018.
NON-DESIGNATED LUMBER SWAP
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements, commodity price movements or other identified risks, but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. In February 2012, we entered into two commodity swap contracts that settled during the second quarter of 2012. In September 2011, we entered into two commodity swap contracts that settled in February 2012. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in net income. There were no outstanding lumber swap contracts at December 31, 2013 or 2012.
The fair values of derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows: 
  
 DERIVATIVE ASSETS
 
  
2013

2012

(Dollars in thousands)
BALANCE SHEET
LOCATION
FAIR VALUE
FAIR VALUE
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
Other noncurrent assets
$
1,830

$
2,952

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
$
1,830

$
2,952


The effect of derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
 
LOCATION OF GAIN (LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN
INCOME
 AMOUNT OF GAIN (LOSS)
RECOGNIZED IN INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
  
2013

2012

2011

Derivatives designated in fair value hedging relationships:
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
Realized gain on hedging instrument1
Interest expense
$
960

$
868

$
1,027

Net gain recognized in income from fair value hedges
 
$
960

$
868

$
1,027

 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
Lumber contracts
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative
Cost of goods sold
$

$
(480
)
$
3,356

Realized gain (loss) on derivative
Cost of goods sold

(396
)
1,164

Net gain (loss) recognized in income from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
$

$
(876
)
$
4,520


1 
Realized gain on hedging instrument consists of net cash settlements and interest accruals on the interest rate swaps during the period.
CONCENTRATION OF RISK
One customer accounted for slightly more than 10% of our revenues in the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.