XML 38 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
General
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
General [Abstract]  
General

1. GENERAL

Organization

Crocs, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) are engaged in the design, development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of footwear, apparel and accessories for men, women and children.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for reporting on Form 10-Q. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 was derived from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 Form 10-K”). Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP or SEC rules and regulations for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring matters) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

In the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2014, we recorded an out-of-period adjustment related to the calculation of a beneficial conversion feature associated with the issuance of the Series A convertible preferred stock (“Series A preferred stock”) on January 27, 2014. This adjustment was a non-cash adjustment and had no effect on operating income. The adjustment decreased the previously reported balance of the Series A preferred stock and increased the previously reported balance of additional paid-in capital by approximately $12.3 million. The adjustment did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and there was no impact on our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income or cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts on the condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. We segregated certain restructuring charges recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of income during the three months ended March 31, 2014 to the restructuring charges line item on the condensed consolidated statements of income during the six months ended June 30, 2014. In addition, we segregated certain accrued restructuring charges recorded to accrued expenses and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2014 and changes in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2014 to the accrued restructuring line item on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2014 and changes in accrued restructuring on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014. These reclassifications had no effect on income from operations, current liabilities or cash provided by (used in) operating activities.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the 2013 Form 10-K. The accounting policies used in preparing these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are the same as those described in Note 1 — Organization & Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements in the 2013 Form 10-K.

 

Earnings per share - Basic and diluted earnings per common share (“EPS”) is presented using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common stock and any participating securities according to dividend rights and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under the two-class method, EPS is computed by dividing the sum of distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. A participating security is a security that may participate in undistributed earnings with common stock had those earnings been distributed in any form. Our recently issued Series A preferred stock represent participating securities as holders of the Series A preferred stock are entitled to receive any and all dividends declared or paid on common stock on an as-converted basis. In addition, shares of our non-vested restricted stock awards are considered participating securities as they represent unvested share-based payment awards containing non-forfeitable rights to dividends. As such, these participating securities must be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method on a pro-rata, as-converted basis. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution from securities that could share in our earnings. In addition, the dilutive effect of each participating security is calculated using the more dilutive of the two-class method described above, which assumes that the securities remain in their current form, or the if-converted method, which assumes conversion to common stock as of the beginning of the reporting date. Anti-dilutive securities are excluded from diluted EPS. See Note 12—Earnings Per Share for further discussion.

Beneficial conversion feature – The issuance of our Series A preferred stock generated a beneficial conversion feature, which arises when a debt or equity security is issued with an embedded conversion option that is beneficial to the investor or in the money at inception because the conversion option has an effective strike price that is less than the market price of the underlying stock at the commitment date. We recognized the beneficial conversion feature by allocating the intrinsic value of the conversion option, which is the number of common shares available upon conversion multiplied by the difference between the effective conversion price per share and the fair value of common stock per share on the commitment date, to additional paid-in capital, resulting in a discount on the Series A preferred stock. We will accrete the discount from the date of issuance through the redemption date of eight years following issuance. Accretion expense will be recognized as dividend equivalents over the eight year period utilizing the effective interest method.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

Discontinued Operations

 

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08: Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which amends the definition of a discontinued operation in ASC 205-20 and requires entities to provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued-operations criteria. The FASB issued the ASU to provide more decision-useful information and to make it more difficult for a disposal transaction to qualify as a discontinued operation. Under the previous guidance, the results of operations of a component of an entity were classified as a discontinued operation if all of the following conditions were met:

 

·

The component has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale.

·

The operations and cash flows of the component have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction.

·

The entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.

 

The new guidance eliminates the second and third criteria above and instead requires discontinued operations treatment for disposals of a component or group of components that represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major impact on an entity’s operations or financial results. The ASU also expands the scope of ASC 205-20 to disposals of equity method investments and businesses that, upon initial acquisition, qualify as held for sale. In addition, the ASU requires entities to reclassify assets and liabilities of a discontinued operation for all comparative periods presented in the statement of financial position. Before these amendments, ASC 205-20 neither required nor prohibited such presentation. Regarding the statement of cash flows, an entity must disclose, in all periods presented, either (1) operating and investing cash flows or (2) depreciation and amortization, capital expenditures, and significant operating and investing noncash items related to the discontinued operation. This presentation requirement represents a significant change from previous guidance. This ASU is effective prospectively for all disposals or components initially classified as held for sale in periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate this pronouncement to have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued their final standard on revenue from contracts with customers. The standard, issued as ASU No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) by the FASB, outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the revenue model is that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity:

 

·

Identifies the contract(s) with a customer (Step 1)

·

Identifies the performance obligations in the contract (Step 2)

·

Determines the transaction price (Step 3)

·

Allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract (Step 4)

·

Recognizes revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation (Step 5)

 

The ASU applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Certain of the ASU’s provisions also apply to transfers of nonfinancial assets, including in-substance nonfinancial assets that are not an output of an entity’s ordinary activities (e.g., sales of property, plant, and equipment, real estate or intangible assets). Existing accounting guidance applicable to these transfers has been amended or superseded. Compared with current U.S. GAAP, the ASU also requires significantly expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. 

 

The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.