XML 71 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments & Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Commitments & Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments & Contingencies

12. COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES

Rental Commitments and Contingencies

We rent space for our retail stores, offices, warehouses, vehicles, and equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through 2033. Certain leases contain rent escalation clauses (step rents) that require additional rental amounts in the later years of the term. Rent expense for leases with step rents or rent holidays is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Deferred rent is included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets in ‘Accrued expenses and other current liabilities.’

The following table summarizes the composition of rent expense under operating leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

Minimum rentals

 

$

26,047 

 

$

21,458 

 

$

75,093 

 

$

61,177 

Contingent rentals

 

 

5,596 

 

 

4,864 

 

 

15,240 

 

 

13,610 

Less: Sublease rentals

 

 

(158)

 

 

(228)

 

 

(469)

 

 

(667)

Total rent expense

 

$

31,485 

 

$

26,094 

 

$

89,864 

 

$

74,120 

 

Purchase Commitments

As of September 30, 2013, we had purchase commitments with certain third party manufacturers for $176.9 million, which includes an immaterial amount of yet-to-be-received finished product where title passes to us upon receipt.  As of December 31, 2012, we had purchase commitments with certain third party manufacturers for $152.8 million, of which $5.9 million was for yet-to-be-received finished product where title passes to us upon receipt.

Government Tax Audits

 

We are regularly subject to, and are currently undergoing, audits by tax authorities in the United States and foreign jurisdictions for prior tax years.

 

In April 2013, the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil government (“Brazil”) assessed sales taxes, interest and penalties for the period April 2009 to May 2011. We had previously tendered these taxes using Brazil obligations purchased at a discount from third parties. On May 22, 2013, we applied for amnesty in order to receive a significant reduction in penalties and interest, agreed to amend our 2009 through 2012 tax returns to remove the Brazil obligations, and agreed to settle the assessment in cash to Brazil. In June 2013, cash payment was made to Brazil, in full satisfaction of the Brazil assessment. Brazil is making court-ordered payments to holders of the Brazil obligations along with accrued interest.   The Company anticipates that the Brazil obligations (plus accrued interest) will be paid by Brazil in accordance with the court-orders.  The Company is carrying the Brazil obligations at the original discounted cost to the Company and intends to hold the Brazil obligations until paid by Brazil. The net impact of the above is a $6.1 million charge to operating income, and the carrying balance of the Brazil obligations in investments is $3.5 million. 

 

The Company is currently undergoing a tax audit in Canada. We recently received an economic report on certain transfer pricing items from the Canadian tax authorities. While the audit is in its preliminary stages, we believe the results of the economic report to be overstated and intend to assert that any amount due to the Canadian tax authorities is substantially less than reflected in the economic report provided. We expect the resolution of this matter to be long term in nature if assessments and appeals are necessary. We intend to defend our position through litigation if necessary, however, the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation, including the assessment of potentially significant penalties and interest, is inherently uncertain and could be materially different than that reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals and could have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.