XML 54 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Net Investment in Finance Leases
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Net Investment in Finance Leases  
Net Investment in Finance Leases

Note 5—Net Investment in Finance Leases

        The following table represents the components of the net investment in finance leases (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
 

Gross finance lease receivables

  $ 145,951   $ 152,321  

Allowance on gross finance lease receivables

    (823 )   (897 )
           

Gross finance lease receivables, net of allowance

    145,128     151,424  

Unearned income

    (27,888 )   (29,491 )
           

Net investment in finance leases

  $ 117,240   $ 121,933  
           

        The Company evaluates potential losses in its finance lease portfolio by regularly reviewing the specific receivables in the portfolio and analyzing historical loss experience. The Company's historical loss experience on its gross finance lease receivables, after considering equipment recoveries, was less than 1%. Net investment in finance lease receivables is generally charged off after an analysis is completed which indicates that collection of the full balance is remote.

        In order to estimate its allowance for losses contained in the gross finance lease receivables, the Company categorizes the credit worthiness of the receivables in the portfolio based on internal customer credit ratings, which are reviewed and updated, as appropriate, on an ongoing basis. The internal customer credit ratings are developed based on a review of the financial performance and condition, operating environment, geographical location and trade routes of our customers.

        The categories of gross finance lease receivables based on the Company's internal customer credit ratings can be described as follows:

  •         Tier 1—These customers are typically large international shipping lines who have been in business for many years and have world class operating capabilities and significant financial resources. In most cases, the Company has had a long commercial relationship with these customers and currently maintains regular communication with them at several levels of management, which provides TAL with insight into the customer's current operating and financial performance. In the Company's view, these customers have the greatest ability to withstand cyclical down turns and would likely have greater access to needed capital than lower rated customers. The Company views the risk of default for Tier 1 customers to range from minimal to modest.

            Tier 2—These customers are typically either smaller shipping lines with less operating scale or shipping lines with a high degree of financial leverage, and accordingly the Company views these customers as subject to higher volatility in financial performance over the business cycle. The Company generally expects these customers to have less access to capital markets or other sources of financing during cyclical down turns. The Company views the risk of default for Tier 2 customers as moderate.

            Tier 3—Customers in this category exhibit volatility in payments on a regular basis, thus they are considered non-performing. The Company has initiated or implemented plans to recover equipment on lease to these customers and believes that default is likely, or has already occurred.

        Based on the above categories, the Company's gross finance lease receivables are as follows (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
 

Tier 1

  $ 106,582   $ 109,883  

Tier 2

    39,369     42,438  

Tier 3

         
           

 

  $ 145,951   $ 152,321  
           

        The Company considers an account past due when a payment has not been received in accordance with the terms of the related lease agreement. As of March 31, 2013, approximately $0.1 million of the Company's Tier 1 gross finance lease receivables and $0.5 million of the Company's Tier 2 gross finance lease receivables were past due, substantially all of which were aged approximately 31 days. As of March 31, 2013, none of the Company's gross finance lease receivables were in non-accrual status. The Company recognizes income on gross finance lease receivables in non-accrual status as collections are made.

        The following table represents the activity of the Company's allowance on gross finance lease receivables for the periods presented (in thousands):

 
  Beginning
Balance
  Additions/
(Reversals)
  Other(a)   Ending
Balance
 

Finance Lease—Allowance for doubtful accounts:

                         

For the three months ended

                         

March 31, 2013

  $ 897   $ (73 ) $ (1 ) $ 823  

March 31, 2012

  $ 1,073   $ (27 ) $ 1   $ 1,047  

(a)
Primarily relates to the effect of foreign currency translation.