UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☑ Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022 or

☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition period from _____ to _____

Commission File Number: 001-41093

HOME BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Arkansas	71-0682831
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
719 Harkrider, Suite 100, Conway, Arkansas	72032
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(501) 339-2929

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	HOMB	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer	☑	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.☑

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b) . [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2022, was $3.96 billion based upon the last trade price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange of $20.77.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common Stock Issued and Outstanding: 203,607,141 shares as of February 22, 2023.

Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2023 Annual Meeting to be held on April 20, 2023, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

HOME BANCSHARES, INC.

FORM 10-K

December 31, 2022

INDEX

PART I:		Page No.
Item 1.	Business	5-23
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	23-34
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	34
Item 2.	Properties	34
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	34
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	34
PART II:
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	35-36
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	37-38
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	39-87
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	88-89
Item 8.	Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	89-151
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	151
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	152
Item 9B.	Other Information	152
PART III:
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	152
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	152
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	152-153
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	153
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	153
PART IV:
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	153-155
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	155
Signatures		156
Consent and Certifications		After page 156

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of our statements contained in this document, including matters discussed under the caption “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future financial performance, future plans and strategies, and anticipated events or trends, and include statements about the competitiveness of the banking industry, potential regulatory obligations, our entrance and expansion into other markets, including through potential acquisitions, our other business strategies and other statements that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. When we use words like “may,” “plan,” “contemplate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “continue,” “expect,” “project,” “predict,” “estimate,” “could,” “should,” “would,” and similar expressions, you should consider them as identifying forward-looking statements, although we may use other phrasing. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on our beliefs and assumptions, and on the information available to us at the time that these disclosures were prepared. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

•the effects of future local, regional, national and international economic conditions, including inflation or a decrease in commercial real estate and residential housing values;

•changes in the level of nonperforming assets and charge-offs, and credit risk generally;

•the risks of changes in interest rates or the level and composition of deposits, loan demand and the values of loan collateral, securities and interest-sensitive assets and liabilities;

•disruptions, uncertainties and related effects on credit quality, liquidity, other aspects of our business and our operations that may result from any future outbreaks of the COVID-19 pandemic and measures that may be implemented or imposed in response to such outbreaks;

•the effect of any mergers, acquisitions or other transactions to which we or our bank subsidiary may from time to time be a party, including our ability to successfully integrate any businesses that we acquire;

•the risk that expected cost savings and other benefits from acquisitions may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected;

•the possibility that an acquisition does not close when expected or at all because required regulatory, shareholder or other approvals and other conditions to closing are not received or satisfied on a timely basis or at all;

•the reaction to a proposed acquisition transaction of the respective companies’ customers, employees and counterparties;

•diversion of management time on acquisition-related issues;

•the ability to enter into and/or close additional acquisitions;

•the availability of and access to capital on terms acceptable to us;

•increased regulatory requirements and supervision that applies as a result of our having over $10 billion in total assets;

•legislation and regulation affecting the financial services industry as a whole, and the Company and its subsidiaries in particular, and future legislative and regulatory changes;

•changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies;

•the effects of terrorism and efforts to combat it;

•political instability, war, military conflicts (including the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine) and other major domestic or international events;

3

•adverse weather events, including hurricanes, and other natural disasters;

•the ability to keep pace with technological changes, including changes regarding cybersecurity;

•an increase in the incidence or severity of fraud, illegal payments, cybersecurity breaches or other illegal acts impacting our bank subsidiary, our vendors or our customers;

•the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone and the Internet;

•potential claims, expenses and other adverse effects related to current or future litigation, regulatory examinations or other government actions;

•the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices and auditing requirements, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, as well as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and other accounting standard setters;

•higher defaults on our loan portfolio than we expect; and

•the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of our allowance for credit losses or changes in our estimate of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.

All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this Cautionary Note. Our actual results may differ significantly from those we discuss in these forward-looking statements. The factors identified in this section are not intended to represent a complete list of all the factors that could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows. Other factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial to us may also have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows, and the factors we have identified could affect us to a greater extent than we currently anticipate. Many of the important factors that will determine our future financial performance and financial condition are beyond our ability to control or predict. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. For other factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from estimates and projections contained in these forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” below. Except as required by applicable law or the rules and regulations of the SEC, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

4

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

Company Overview

Home BancShares, Inc. (“Home BancShares”, which may also be referred to in this document as “we,” “us,” “HBI” or the “Company”) is a Conway, Arkansas headquartered bank holding company registered under the federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. The Company’s common stock is traded through the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “HOMB.” We are primarily engaged in providing a broad range of commercial and retail banking and related financial services to businesses, real estate developers and investors, individuals and municipalities through our wholly owned community bank subsidiary – Centennial Bank. Centennial Bank has branch locations in Arkansas, Florida, Texas, South Alabama and New York City. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, at December 31, 2022 and 2021, commercial real estate loans represented 56.3% and 59.7% of gross loans and 230.1% and 212.2% of total stockholders’ equity, respectively. The Company’s total assets, total deposits, total revenue and net income for each of the past three years are as follows:

	December 31,
	2022		2021		2020
	(In thousands)
Total assets	$	22,883,588	$	18,052,138	$	16,398,804
Total deposits	17,938,783		14,260,570		12,725,790
Total revenue (net interest income plus non-interest income)	933,787		710,540		694,341
Net income	305,262		319,021		214,448

Home BancShares acquires, organizes and invests in community banks that serve attractive markets. Our community banking team is built around experienced bankers with strong local relationships. The Company was formed in 1998 by an investor group led by John W. Allison, our Chairman, and Robert H. “Bunny” Adcock, Jr., one of our directors. Since opening our first subsidiary bank in 1999, we have acquired and integrated a total of 23 banks with locations in Arkansas, Florida, Texas and Alabama, including 18 banks since 2010, seven of which we acquired through Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assisted transactions. Our subsidiary bank has operated under a single charter and the Centennial Bank name since 2009. In 2015, after acquiring a pool of national commercial real estate loans, we created Centennial Commercial Finance Group (“Centennial CFG”) to build out a national lending platform focused on commercial real estate as well as commercial and industrial loans. Centennial CFG operates out of our New York City branch office and loan production offices in Los Angeles, California, Dallas, Texas and Miami, Florida. In 2018, we acquired Shore Premier Finance (“SPF”), a marine-lending division of Union Bank & Trust of Richmond, Virginia, and established the SPF division of Centennial Bank to build out a lending platform focusing on commercial and consumer marine loans. In 2020, we acquired LH-Finance, the marine lending division of People’s United Bank, N.A. of Bridgeport, Connecticut, and consolidated LH-Finance and its loan portfolio with our SPF division. The SPF division operates out of loan production offices in Chesapeake, Virginia and Baltimore, Maryland. In 2022, we completed our largest acquisition to-date and first in the state of Texas with the acquisition of Happy Bancshares, Inc. and its bank subsidiary, Happy State Bank, headquartered in Amarillo, Texas, on April 1, 2022.

Acquisitions

We believe many individuals and businesses prefer banking with a locally managed community bank capable of providing flexibility and quick decisions. The execution of our community banking strategy has allowed us to rapidly build our network of banking operations through acquisitions. The following summary provides additional details concerning our acquisitions during the previous five fiscal years.

Shore Premier Finance – On June 30, 2018, the Company acquired Shore Premier Finance (“SPF”), a division of Union Bank & Trust of Richmond, Virginia, the bank subsidiary of Union Bankshares Corporation. The Company paid a purchase price of approximately $377.4 million in cash, subject to certain post-closing adjustments, and 1,250,000 shares of HBI common stock valued at approximately $28.2 million at the time of the acquisition. SPF provides direct consumer financing for United States Coast Guard (“USCG”) registered high-end sail and power boats. Additionally, SPF provides inventory floor plan lines of credit to marine dealers, primarily those selling USCG documented vessels.

Including the purchase accounting adjustments, as of acquisition date, SPF had approximately $377.0 million in total assets, including $376.2 million in total loans, which resulted in goodwill of $30.5 million being recorded.

5

This portfolio of loans is now housed in a division of Centennial Bank known as Shore Premier Finance. The SPF division of Centennial Bank is responsible for servicing the acquired loan portfolio and originating new loan production. In connection with this acquisition, Centennial Bank opened a new loan production office in Chesapeake, Virginia, to house the SPF division. Through the SPF division, Centennial Bank is working to build out a lending platform focusing on commercial and consumer marine loans.

LH-Finance – On February 29, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of LH-Finance, the marine lending division of People’s United Bank, N.A., for a cash purchase price of approximately $421.2 million. Like SPF, LH-Finance provides direct consumer financing for USCG registered high-end sail and power boats, as well as inventory floor plan lines of credit to marine dealers, primarily those selling USCG documented vessels.

Including the purchase accounting adjustments, as of the acquisition date, LH-Finance had approximately $409.1 million in total assets, including $407.4 million in total loans, which resulted in goodwill of $14.6 million being recorded.

The acquired portfolio of loans is now housed in our SPF division. The SPF division is responsible for servicing the acquired loan portfolio and originating new loan production. In connection with this acquisition, we opened a new loan production office in Baltimore, Maryland.

LendingClub Bank Marine Portfolio – On February 4, 2022, the Company completed the purchase of the performing marine loan portfolio of Utah-based LendingClub Bank (“LendingClub”). Under the terms of the purchase agreement with LendingClub, the Company acquired approximately $242.2 million of yacht loans. This portfolio of loans is housed within the Company's SPF division, which is responsible for servicing the acquired loan portfolio and originating new loan production.

Happy Bancshares, Inc. – On April 1, 2022, the Company completed the acquisition of Happy Bancshares, Inc. (“Happy”), and merged Happy State Bank into Centennial Bank. The Company issued approximately 42.4 million shares of its common stock valued at approximately $958.8 million as of April 1, 2022. In addition, the holders of certain Happy stock-based awards received approximately $3.7 million in cash in cancellation of such awards, for a total transaction value of approximately $962.5 million.

Including the effects of the known purchase accounting adjustments, as of the acquisition date, Happy had approximately $6.69 billion in total assets, $3.65 billion in loans and $5.86 billion in customer deposits. Happy formerly operated its banking business from 62 locations in Texas.

For an additional discussion regarding the acquisition of LendingClub's Marine Portfolio, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. For additional discussions regarding the acquisitions of Happy and LH-Finance, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. For an additional discussion regarding the acquisition of SPF, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

6

Our Management Team

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2022, information concerning the individuals who are our executive officers.

Name	Age	Positions Held with Home BancShares, Inc.	Positions Held with Centennial Bank
John W. Allison	76	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President	Director
Brian S. Davis	57	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director
Jennifer C. Floyd	48	Chief Accounting Officer	Chief Accounting Officer
Kevin D. Hester	59	Chief Lending Officer	Chief Lending Officer and Director
J. Stephen Tipton	41	Chief Operating Officer	Chief Operating Officer
Tracy M. French	61	Director and Executive Officer	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
Donna J. Townsell	52	Senior Executive Vice President, Director of Investor Relations and Director	Senior Executive Vice President and Director
Russell D. Carter, III	47	Executive Officer	Regional President
Kenneth Mikel Williamson, Jr.	52	Executive Officer	Regional President

Our Growth Strategy

Our goals are to achieve growth in earnings per share and to create and build stockholder value. Our growth strategy entails the following:

•Strategic acquisitions – Strategic acquisitions (both FDIC-assisted and non-FDIC-assisted) have been a significant component of our historical growth strategy, and we believe properly priced bank acquisitions can continue to be a large part of our growth strategy. We completed the acquisition of Happy Bancshares, Inc. headquartered in Amarillo, Texas, during the second quarter of 2022. Our principal acquisition focus in the near term will be to continue to expand our presence in Texas, Arkansas, Florida and Alabama and into other contiguous markets, although we may seek to expand into other areas if attractive financial opportunities in other market areas arise. We will continue to evaluate potential bank acquisition opportunities to determine whether they are in the best interests of our Company. Our goals in making these decisions are to maximize the return to our shareholders and to enhance our franchise.

•Organic growth – We believe our current branch network provides us with the capacity to grow within our existing market areas. We also believe we are well positioned to attract new business and additional experienced personnel as a result of ongoing changes in our competitive markets. We believe the markets we entered into as a result of historical acquisitions provide us opportunities for organic growth as we now have a presence in several large markets where our market share has not previously been significant. Through our Centennial CFG franchise, we are continuing to build out a national lending platform that focuses on commercial real estate plus commercial and industrial loans. Additionally, through our SPF division, we are continuing to build a lending platform focusing on commercial and consumer marine loans. As opportunities arise, we will evaluate new (commonly referred to as de novo) branches in our current markets and in other attractive market areas. We opened one de novo branch location during 2022 in Ft. Worth, Texas. We will continue to evaluate de novo opportunities during 2023 and make decisions on a case-by-case basis in the best interest of the shareholders.

7

Community Banking Philosophy

Our community banking philosophy consists of four basic principles:

•manage our community banking franchise with experienced bankers and community bank boards who are empowered to make customer-related decisions quickly;

•provide exceptional service and develop strong customer relationships;

•pursue the business relationships of our local boards of directors, executive officers, stockholders, and customers to actively promote our community bank; and

•maintain our commitment to the communities we serve by supporting civic and nonprofit organizations.

These principles, which make up our community banking philosophy, are the driving force for our business. As we streamlined our legacy business into an efficient banking network and have integrated new acquisitions, we have preserved lending authority with local management in most cases by using local loan committees that maintain an integral connection to the communities we serve. These committees are empowered with lending authority of up to $6.0 million in their respective geographic areas. This allows us to capitalize on the strong relationships that these individuals and our local bank officers have in their respective communities to maintain and grow our business. Through experienced and empowered local bankers and board members, we are committed to maintaining a community banking experience for our customers.

Operating Goals

Our operating goals focus on maintaining strong credit quality, increasing profitability, finding experienced bankers, and maintaining a “fortress” balance sheet:

•Maintain strong credit quality – Credit quality is our first priority. We employ a set of credit standards designed to ensure the proper management of credit risk. Our management team plays an active role in monitoring compliance with these credit standards in the different communities served by Centennial Bank. We have a centralized loan review process, which we believe enables us to take prompt action on potential problem loans. We have historically taken an aggressive approach to resolving problem loans, including those problem loans acquired in our FDIC-assisted and non-FDIC-assisted acquisitions. We are committed to maintaining high credit quality standards.

•Continue to improve profitability – We will continue to strive to improve our profitability and achieve high performance ratios as we continue to utilize the available capacity of branches and employees. We believe our profitability is significantly tied to our focus on our efficiency ratio, and we pride ourselves on operating in a highly efficient manner. To achieve further improvements in operating efficiency, we will continue to focus on increasing revenue from organic loan growth, achieving cost savings from any acquisitions, developing and implementing new efficiency initiatives, further streamlining the processes in our lending and retail operations and improving our purchasing power.

•Attract and motivate experienced bankers – We believe a major factor in our success has been our ability to attract and motivate bankers who have experience in and knowledge of their local communities. Historically, our hiring and retaining experienced relationship bankers has been integral to our ability to grow quickly when entering new markets.

•Maintain a “fortress” balance sheet – We intend to maintain a strong balance sheet through a focus on four key governing principles: (1) maintain solid asset quality; (2) remain well-capitalized; (3) pursue high performance metrics including return on tangible equity (ROTE), return on assets (ROA), efficiency ratio and net interest margin; and (4) retain liquidity at the bank holding company level that can be utilized should attractive acquisition opportunities be identified or for internal capital needs. We strive to maintain capital levels above the regulatory capital requirements through our focus on these governing principles, which historically has allowed us to take advantage of acquisition opportunities as they become available without the need for additional capital.

Our Market Areas

As of December 31, 2022, we conducted business principally through 76 branches in Arkansas, 78 branches in Florida, 63 branches in Texas, five branches in Alabama and one branch in New York City. Our branch footprint includes markets in which we are the deposit market share leader as well as markets where we believe we have opportunities for deposit market share growth. As of December 31, 2022, we also operate loan production offices in Los Angeles, California; Miami, Florida and Dallas, Texas through our Centennial CFG division and in Chesapeake, Virginia and Baltimore, Maryland through our SPF division.

8

Lending Activities

We originate loans primarily secured by single and multi-family real estate, residential construction and commercial buildings. In addition, we make loans to small and medium-sized commercial businesses as well as to consumers for a variety of purposes.

Our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2022, was comprised as follows:

	Total Loans Receivable		Percentage of portfolio
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	5,632,063	39.1	%
Construction/land development	2,135,266		14.8
Agricultural	346,811		2.4
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family	1,748,551		12.1
Multifamily residential	578,052		4.0
Total real estate	10,440,743		72.4
Consumer	1,149,896		8.0
Commercial and industrial	2,349,263		16.3
Agricultural	285,235		2.0
Other	184,343		1.3
Total	$	14,409,480	100.0	%

Real Estate – Non-farm/Non-residential. Non-farm/non-residential real estate loans consist primarily of loans secured by income-producing properties, such as shopping/retail centers, hotel/motel properties, office buildings, and industrial/warehouse properties. Commercial lending on income-producing properties typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment of these loans is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties collateralizing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. This category of loans also includes specialized properties such as churches, marinas, and nursing homes. Additionally, we make commercial mortgage loans to entities to operate in these types of properties, and the repayment of these loans is dependent, in large part, on the cash flow generated by these entities in the operations of the business. Often, a secondary source of repayment will include the sale of the subject collateral. When this is the case, it is generally our practice to obtain an independent appraisal of this collateral within the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines.

Real Estate – Construction/Land Development. This category of loans includes loans to residential and commercial developers to purchase raw land and to develop this land into residential and commercial land developments. In addition, this category includes construction loans for all of the types of real estate loans, including both commercial and residential. These loans are generally secured by a first lien on the real estate being purchased or developed. Often, the primary source of repayment will be the sale of the subject collateral. When this is the case, it is generally our practice to obtain an independent appraisal of this collateral within the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines.

Real Estate – Residential. Our residential mortgage loan program primarily originates loans to individuals for the purchase of residential property. We generally do not retain long-term, fixed-rate residential real estate loans in our portfolio due to interest rate and collateral risks. Residential mortgage loans to individuals retained in our loan portfolio primarily consisted of approximately 42.3% owner occupied 1-4 family properties and approximately 47.6% non-owner occupied 1-4 family properties (rental) as of December 31, 2022 with the remaining 10.1% relating to condos and mobile homes. The primary source of repayment for these loans is generally the income and/or assets of the individual to whom the loan is made. Often, a secondary source of repayment will include the sale of the subject collateral. When this is the case, it is generally our practice to obtain an independent appraisal of this collateral within the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines.

9

Consumer. While our focus is on service to small and medium-sized businesses, we also make a variety of loans to individuals for personal, family and household purposes, including secured and unsecured installment and term loans originated by our bank, the primary portion of which consists of loans to finance USCG registered high-end sail and power boats through our SPF division. The primary source of repayment for these loans is generally the income and/or assets of the individual to whom the loan is made. The performance of consumer loans will be affected by the local and regional economies as well as the rates of personal bankruptcies, job loss, divorce and other individual-specific characteristics. When secured, we may independently assess the value of the collateral using a third-party valuation source.

Commercial and Industrial. Our commercial and industrial loan portfolio primarily consisted of 6.9% unsecured loans, 33.9% inventory/accounts receivable financing, 8.1% equipment/vehicle financing and 51.1% other, including letters of credit at less than 1%, as of December 31, 2022. This category includes loans to smaller business ventures, credit lines for working capital and short-term inventory financing, for example. These loans are typically secured by the assets of the business and are supplemented by personal guaranties of the principals and often mortgages on the principals’ primary residences. The primary source of repayment may be conversion of the assets into cash flow, as in inventory and accounts receivable, or may be cash flow generated by operations, as in equipment/vehicle financing. Assessing the value of inventory can involve many factors including, but not limited to, type, age, condition, level of conversion and marketability, and can involve applying a discount factor or obtaining an independent valuation, based on the assessment of the above factors. Assessing the value of accounts receivable can involve many factors including, but not limited to, concentration, aging, and industry, and can involve applying a discount factor or obtaining an independent valuation, based on the assessment of the above factors. Assessing the value of equipment/vehicles may involve a third-party valuation source, where applicable.

Agricultural Loans. Agricultural loans include loans for financing agricultural production, including loans to businesses or individuals engaged in the production of timber, poultry, livestock or crops and are not categorized as part of real estate loans. Our agricultural loans are generally secured by farm machinery, livestock, crops, vehicles or other agricultural-related collateral. A portion of our portfolio of agricultural loans is comprised of loans to individuals which would normally be characterized as consumer loans except for the fact that the individual borrowers are primarily engaged in the production of timber, poultry, livestock or crops.

Credit Risks. The principal economic risk associated with each category of the loans that we make is the creditworthiness of the borrower and the ability of the borrower to repay the loan. General economic conditions and the strength of the services and retail market segments affect borrower creditworthiness. General factors affecting a commercial borrower’s ability to repay include interest rates, inflation and the demand for the commercial borrower’s products and services as well as other factors affecting a borrower’s customers, suppliers and employees.

Risks associated with real estate loans also include fluctuations in the value of real estate, new job creation trends, tenant vacancy rates, and in the case of commercial borrowers, the quality of the borrower’s management. Consumer loan repayments depend upon the borrower’s financial stability and are more likely to be adversely affected by divorce, job loss, illness and other personal hardships.

Lending Policies. We have established common loan documentation procedures and policies, based on the type of loan, for our bank subsidiary. The board of directors periodically reviews these policies for validity. In addition, it has been and will continue to be our practice to attempt to independently verify information provided by our borrowers, including assets and income. We have not made loans similar to those commonly referred to as “no doc” or “stated income” loans. We focus on the primary and secondary methods of repayment and prepare global cash flows where appropriate. There are legal restrictions on the dollar amount of loans available for each lending relationship. The Arkansas Banking Code provides that no loan relationship may exceed 20% of a bank’s risk-based capital, and we are in compliance with this restriction. In addition, we are not dependent upon any single lending relationship for an amount exceeding 10% of our revenues. As of December 31, 2022, the maximum amount outstanding to a single borrower was $231.8 million. As primarily a community lender, we believe from time to time it is in our best interest to agree to modifications or restructurings. These modifications/restructurings can take the form of a reduction in interest rate, a move to interest-only from principal and interest payments, or a lengthening in the amortization period or any combination thereof. Occasionally, we will modify/restructure a single loan by splitting it into two loans following the interagency guidance involving the workout of commercial real estate loans. The loan representing the portion that is supported by the current cash flow of the borrower or project will remain on our books, while the new loan representing the portion that cannot be serviced by the current cash flow is charged-off. Furthermore, we may make an additional loan or loans to a borrower or related interest of a borrower who is past due more than 90 days. These circumstances will be very limited in nature, and when approved by the appropriate lending authority, will likely involve obtaining additional collateral that will improve the collectability of the overall relationship. It is our belief that judicious usage of these tools can improve the quality of our loan portfolio by providing our borrowers an improved probability of survival during difficult economic times.

10

Loan Approval Procedures. Our bank subsidiary has supplemented our common loan policies to establish its loan approval procedures as follows:

•Individual Authorities. The board of directors of Centennial Bank establishes the authorization levels for individual loan officers on a case-by-case basis. Generally, the more experienced a loan officer, the higher the authorization level. The approval authority for individual loan officers ranges from $5,000 to $3.0 million for secured loans and from $1,000 to $3.0 million for unsecured loans.

•Officers’ Loan Committees. Our bank subsidiary also gives its Officers’ Loan Committees loan approval authority. Credits in excess of individual loan limits are submitted to the region’s Officers’ Loan Committee. The Officers’ Loan Committee consists of members of the senior management team of that region and is chaired by that region’s chief lending officer. The regional Officers’ Loan Committees have approval authority of up to $2.0 million secured on all loans and $100,000 unsecured on loan renewals.

•Directors’ Loan Committee. Our bank subsidiary has Directors’ Loan Committees (“DLCs”) throughout our market areas consisting of outside directors and senior lenders of the respective market areas. Generally, each DLC requires a majority of outside directors be present to establish a quorum. Generally, this committee is chaired either by the Division Chief Lending Officer or the Regional President. The regional DLCs have approval authority up to $6.0 million secured and $500,000 unsecured.

•Executive Loan Committee – The board of directors of Centennial Bank established the Executive Loan Committee consisting of outside board members and members of executive management. This committee requires five voting members to establish a quorum, including at least two of the outside board members, and is chaired by the Chief Lending Officer of the bank. The Executive Loan Committee has approval authority up to the Bank’s legal lending limit, subject to exception approval by the full Board for single loans over $100 million or relationships over $200 million. In addition, any relationship above $40 million must have the specific approval of two of the following: the Chairman, the Vice Chairman or our director Richard H. Ashley.

Currently, our board of directors has established an in-house consolidated lending limit of $40.0 million to any one borrowing relationship without obtaining the approval of two of the following: the Chairman, Vice Chairman or our director Richard H. Ashley. We have 76 separate relationships that exceed this in-house limit.

Deposits and Other Sources of Funds

Our principal source of funds for loans and investing in securities is core deposits. We offer a wide range of deposit services, including checking, savings, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. We obtain most of our deposits from individuals and small businesses, and municipalities in our market areas. We believe that the rates we offer for core deposits are competitive with those offered by other financial institutions in our market areas. Additionally, our policy also permits the acceptance of brokered deposits. Secondary sources of funding include advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window and other borrowings. These secondary sources enable us to borrow funds at rates and terms which, at times, are more beneficial to us.

Other Banking Services

Given customer demand for increased convenience and account access, we offer a range of products and services, including 24-hour internet banking, mobile banking and voice response information, cash management, overdraft protection, direct deposit, safe deposit boxes, United States savings bonds and automatic account transfers. We earn fees for most of these services. We also receive ATM transaction fees from transactions performed by our customers participating in a shared network of automated teller machines and a debit card system that our customers can use throughout the United States, as well as in other countries.

Insurance

Centennial Insurance Agency, Inc. is an independent insurance agency, originally founded in 1959 and purchased by Centennial Bank in 2000. Centennial Insurance Agency writes policies for commercial and personal lines of business including insurance for property, casualty, life, health and employee benefits. It is subject to regulation by the Arkansas Insurance Department. The offices of Centennial Insurance Agency are currently located in Jacksonville, Cabot and Conway, Arkansas.

11

Cook Insurance Agency, Inc. is an independent insurance agency, originally founded in 1913 and acquired by Centennial Bank in 2010 during our FDIC-assisted acquisition of Gulf State Community Bank. Cook Insurance Agency writes policies for commercial and personal lines of business including life insurance. It is subject to regulation by the Florida Insurance Department. The offices of Cook Insurance Agency are located in Apalachicola and Crawfordville, Florida.

Competition

As of December 31, 2022, we conducted business through 223 branch locations in our primary market areas of Pulaski, Faulkner, Craighead, Lonoke, Pope, Washington, White, Benton, Greene, Sebastian, Cleburne, Independence, Stone, Baxter, Clay, Conway, Crawford, Johnson, Saline, Sharp and Yell counties in Arkansas; Broward, Monroe, Hillsborough, Leon, Sarasota, Bay, Franklin, Palm Beach, Gulf, Charlotte, Collier, Escambia, Orange, Osceola, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, Walton, Miami-Dade, Lee, Calhoun, Gadsden, Hernando, Liberty, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Seminole, Wakulla and Manatee counties in Florida; Bailey; Briscoe; Carson; Castro; Collin; Comal; Dallam; Dallas; Deaf Smith; Floyd; Garza; Gillespie; Gray; Hale; Hall; Hemphill; Hutchinson; Kendall; Kerr; Lamb; Lipscomb; Lubbock; Lynn; Moore; Motley; Potter; Randall; Sherman; Swisher; Tarrant; Taylor; Travis; Wheeler and Williamson counties in Texas; Baldwin County in Alabama; and New York County in New York. Many other commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions have offices in our primary market areas. These institutions include many of the largest banks operating in these respective states, including some of the largest banks in the country. Many of our competitors serve the same counties we do. Our competitors often have greater resources, have broader geographic markets, have higher lending limits, offer various services that we may not currently offer and may better afford and make broader use of media advertising, support services and electronic technology than we do. To offset these competitive disadvantages, we depend on our reputation as having greater personal service, consistency, and flexibility and the ability to make credit and other business decisions quickly.

Human Capital Resources

General. Our community banking philosophy relies heavily on the personal relationships and the quality of service provided by employees. We rely on experienced bankers and community bank boards who are empowered to make customer-related decisions quickly. Experienced and empowered local bankers and board members facilitate our commitment to provide exceptional service and develop strong customer relationships. At the local level, we have preserved lending authority by using local loan committees that maintain an integral connection to the communities we serve, which allows us to capitalize on the strong relationships that these individuals and our local bank officers have in their respective communities to maintain and grow our business. Accordingly, we aim to attract, develop and retain employees who can drive financial and strategic growth objectives and build long-term shareholder value while executing our community banking philosophy.

On December 31, 2022, we had 2,774 full-time equivalent employees. Except for any additional employees acquired in future acquisitions, we expect that our 2023 staffing levels will be slightly higher than those at year end 2022 to meet increased regulatory requirements. We consider our employee relations to be good, and we have no collective bargaining agreements with any employees.

In managing the Company’s business, management focuses on various human capital measures and objectives designed to address the development, attraction and retention of personnel. These include competitive compensation and benefits, paid time off, an employee retirement plan, bonus and other incentive compensation plans, modern equipment and support, leadership development and professional development as well as those benefits described below.

Diversity and Inclusion. We seek to recognize the unique contribution each individual brings to the Company, and we understand the associated value that comes with a diverse workforce. We strive to offer an inclusive environment where employees from all backgrounds can succeed. As of December 31, 2022, 70% of our employees were women and 26% of our employees identify as a person of color. Further, as of December 31, 2022, 60% of the Company’s leadership positions were held by women.

Employee Safety and Health. The health and well-being of our employees is a priority for our business. Our full-time officers and employees are provided hospitalization and major medical insurance. We pay a substantial part of the premiums for these coverages. We also provide other basic insurance coverage including dental, life, and long-term disability insurance.

Although our offices have generally returned to a normal working environment following the COVID-19 pandemic, we continue to support working remotely for those employees who have a need to telework for health reasons and in certain other circumstances. We also stand ready to re-implement COVID-19 safety protocols should circumstances dictate due a future outbreak of the virus or another public health crisis.

12

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

We and our bank subsidiary are subject to extensive state and federal banking regulations that impose restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight of our company and its operations. These laws generally are intended to protect depositors, the deposit insurance fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the banking system as a whole, and not shareholders.

The following discussion describes significant elements of the regulatory framework that applies to us. This description is a summary, does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the statutes, regulations and policies that are described. Also, such statutes, regulations and policies are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to us and our subsidiaries could have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Because our bank subsidiary’s total assets exceed $10 billion, it is subject to additional supervision and regulation, including by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), with such additional supervision and regulation discussed throughout this section.

Home BancShares

We are a bank holding company registered under the federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “Bank Holding Company Act”), and we and our subsidiaries are subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve Board. The Bank Holding Company Act and other federal laws subject bank holding companies to particular restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations. The Bank Holding Company Act provides generally for “umbrella” regulation of bank holding companies by the Federal Reserve Board and functional regulation of banking activities by bank regulators, securities activities by securities regulators, and insurance activities by insurance regulators.

Dodd Frank and the EGRRCPA. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) made extensive changes in the regulation of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act contains a comprehensive set of provisions designed to govern the practices and oversight of financial institutions and other participants in the financial markets. The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the “EGRRCPA”), signed into law in May 2018, made certain limited amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as certain targeted modifications to other post-financial crisis regulations. Some of the Dodd-Frank Act and EGRRCPA provisions are described in more detail below.

Permitted Activities. A bank holding company is generally permitted under the Bank Holding Company Act to engage in or acquire direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in the following activities:

•banking or managing or controlling banks; and

•any activity that the Federal Reserve Board determines to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident to the business of banking.

Activities that the Federal Reserve Board has found to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident to the business of banking include but are not limited to: factoring accounts receivable; making, acquiring, brokering or servicing loans and usual related activities; leasing personal or real property; operating a non-bank depository institution, such as a savings association; trust company functions; financial and investment advisory activities; conducting securities brokerage activities; underwriting and dealing in government obligations and money market instruments; providing specified management consulting and counseling activities; performing selected data processing services and support services; acting as agent or broker in selling credit life insurance and other types of insurance in connection with credit transactions; and performing selected insurance underwriting activities.

Support of Subsidiary Institutions. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, we are required to act as a source of financial strength for our bank subsidiary and to commit resources to support the bank. The Dodd-Frank Act gives the Federal Reserve the authority to require us to make capital injections into our bank subsidiary and to charge us with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices if we fail to commit resources to our bank subsidiary or if we undertake actions that the Federal Reserve believes might jeopardize our ability to commit resources to the bank. As a result, an obligation to support our bank subsidiary may be required at times when, without this requirement, we might not be inclined to provide it.

13

Safe and Sound Banking Practices. Bank holding companies are not permitted to engage in unsafe and unsound banking practices. The Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y, for example, generally requires a holding company to give the Federal Reserve Board prior notice of any redemption or repurchase of its own equity securities, if the consideration to be paid, together with the consideration paid for any repurchases or redemptions in the preceding year, is equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Board requires prior approval of any redemption or repurchase of preferred stock or subordinated debt. The Federal Reserve Board may oppose the transaction if it believes that the transaction would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law or regulation. Depending upon the circumstances, the Federal Reserve Board could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.

The Federal Reserve Board has broad authority to prohibit activities of bank holding companies and their non-banking subsidiaries which represent unsafe and unsound banking practices, or which constitute violations of laws or regulations, and can assess civil money penalties for certain activities conducted on a knowing and reckless basis, if those activities caused a substantial loss to a depository institution. The penalties can be as high as approximately $2 million for each day the activity continues.

Annual Reporting; Examinations. We are required to file annual reports with the Federal Reserve Board, and such additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act. The Federal Reserve Board may examine a bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries and charge the company for the cost of such examination.

Capital Adequacy Requirements. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted a system using risk-based capital guidelines to evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies having $500 million or more in assets on a consolidated basis. Under the guidelines, specific categories of assets are assigned different risk weights, based generally on the perceived credit risk of the asset. These risk weights are multiplied by corresponding asset balances to determine a “risk-weighted” asset base.

The current risk-based capital requirements applicable to all depository institutions and bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $500 million or more and savings and loan holding companies (collectively, “banking organizations”), and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets, are based on agreements reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in “Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems” (“Basel III”) and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, as modified by certain capital simplification rules adopted by the Federal Reserve Board and other federal bank regulatory agencies in 2019. The final rule adopted by the Federal Reserve Board and other federal bank regulatory agencies in 2013 based on Basel III (the “Basel III final rule”) requires us to maintain minimum capital ratios with respect to common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital (Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital), each as compared to our risk-weighted assets, as well as a “leverage ratio” calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements. The Basel III final rule also limits a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% of CET1 capital to risk-weighted assets, which is in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements.

The required minimum capital and leverage ratios under the Basel III capital adequacy requirements in effect as of December 31, 2022, including the required capital conservation buffer, consist of CET1 capital of 7.0% (4.5% plus the required 2.5% capital conservation buffer), Tier 1 risk-based capital of 8.5% (6.0% plus the required 2.5% capital conservation buffer), total risk-based capital of 10.5% (8.0% plus the required 2.5% capital conservation buffer) and a leverage ratio of 4.0%. As of December 31, 2022, our capital conservation buffer was 6.91%, and our CET1 capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and leverage ratios were 12.91%, 12.91, 16.54 and 10.86, respectively.

The Basel III final rule adopted in 2013 permanently grandfathered trust preferred securities and other non-qualifying capital instruments that were issued and outstanding as of May 19, 2010 in the Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009. The rule phased out of Tier 1 capital these non-qualifying capital instruments issued before May 19, 2010 by all other bank holding companies. Because our total consolidated assets were less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009, our outstanding trust preferred securities continued to be treated as Tier 1 capital until the completion of our acquisition of Happy Bancshares on April 1, 2022, after which those securities were treated as Tier 2 capital. During the second and third quarters of 2022, the Company redeemed, without penalty, all of its outstanding trust preferred securities. As a result, the Company no longer holds any trust preferred securities.

14

The federal banking agencies’ risk-based and leverage ratios are minimum supervisory ratios generally applicable to banking organizations that meet certain specified criteria. The federal bank regulatory agencies may set capital requirements for a particular banking organization that are higher than the minimum ratios when circumstances warrant. Federal Reserve Board guidelines also provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions, substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets.

The Dodd-Frank Act includes certain provisions concerning the capital regulations of the federal banking agencies. These provisions, often referred to as the “Collins Amendment,” are intended to subject bank holding companies to the same capital requirements as their bank subsidiaries and to eliminate or significantly reduce the use of hybrid capital instruments, especially trust preferred securities, as regulatory capital. The Collins Amendment requires banking regulators to develop regulations setting minimum risk-based and leverage capital requirements for holding companies and banks on a consolidated basis that are no less stringent than the generally applicable requirements in effect for depository institutions under the prompt corrective action regulations discussed below. The banking regulators also must seek to make capital standards countercyclical so that the required levels of capital increase in times of economic expansion and decrease in times of economic contraction.

Prompt Corrective Action. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 or “FDICIA” establishes a system of prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized financial institutions. Under this system, the federal banking regulators have established five capital categories (well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized) in which all institutions are placed. Federal banking regulators are required to take various mandatory supervisory actions and are authorized to take other discretionary actions with respect to institutions in the three undercapitalized categories. The severity of the action depends upon the capital category in which the institution is placed. The federal banking agencies have specified by regulation the relevant capital level for each category.

An institution that is categorized as undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized is required to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan to its appropriate federal banking agency. An undercapitalized institution is also generally prohibited from increasing its average total assets, making acquisitions, establishing any branches or engaging in any new line of business, except under an accepted capital restoration plan or with FDIC approval. The regulations also establish procedures for downgrading an institution to a lower capital category based on supervisory factors other than capital.

The Basel III final rule amended the prompt corrective action rules to incorporate a CET1 capital requirement and to raise the capital requirements for certain capital categories. In order to be adequately capitalized for purposes of the prompt corrective action rules, a banking organization is required to have at least an 8% total risk-based capital ratio, a 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, a CET1 4.5% risk-based capital ratio and a 4% Tier 1 leverage ratio. To be well-capitalized, a banking organization is required to have at least a 10% total risk-based capital ratio, an 8% Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, a 6.5% CET1 risk-based capital ratio and a 5% Tier 1 leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2022, we met all capital adequacy requirements and our bank subsidiary is considered well-capitalized for regulatory purposes.

Liquidity Requirements. The Basel III liquidity framework requires banks and bank holding companies to measure their liquidity against specific liquidity tests. One test, referred to as the liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”), is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a 30-day time horizon (or, if greater, 25% of its expected total cash outflow) under an acute liquidity stress scenario. The other test, referred to as the net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”), is designed to promote more medium- and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banking entities over a one-year time horizon. These requirements are expected to incent banking entities to increase their holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and other sovereign debt as a component of assets and increase the use of long-term debt as a funding source. Rules applicable to certain large banking organizations have been implemented for LCR and for NSFR; however, based on our asset size, these rules do not currently apply to us or our bank subsidiary.

15

Stress Testing. Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, in October 2012, the Federal Reserve Board published its final rules regarding company-run stress testing. The rules required institutions with average total consolidated assets greater than $10 billion, such as the Company and our bank subsidiary, to conduct an annual company-run stress test of capital and consolidated earnings and losses under one base and at least two stress scenarios provided by bank regulatory agencies. The EGRRCPA raised the asset thresholds for Dodd-Frank Act company-run stress testing, liquidity coverage and living will requirements for bank holding companies to $250 billion, subject to the ability of the Fed to apply such requirements to institutions with assets of $100 billion or more to address financial stability risks or safety and soundness concerns. On July 6, 2018, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) issued a joint interagency statement regarding the impact of the EGRRCPA. As a result of this statement and the EGRRCPA, we and our bank subsidiary are no longer subject to Dodd-Frank Act stress testing requirements. Notwithstanding these amendments to the stress testing requirements, the federal banking agencies indicated through interagency guidance that the capital planning and risk management practices of institutions with total assets less than $100 billion would continue to be reviewed through the regular supervisory process. We will continue to monitor our capital consistent with the safety and soundness expectations of the federal regulators.

Risk Management. Regulation YY initially required publicly-traded bank holding companies with $10 billion or more in total assets to establish a risk committee responsible for oversight of enterprise-wide risk management practices. The committee must be chaired by an independent director and include at least one risk management expert with experience in managing risk exposures of large, complex firms. As a result of our total assets exceeding $10 billion, we established a risk committee meeting these requirements. However, in 2018 the EGRRCPA increased the asset threshold for mandatory risk committees from $10 billion to $50 billion in total assets. While we are no longer required to maintain a risk committee, we currently continue to utilize our risk committee to oversee our enterprise-wide risk management practices.

Regulation YY also requires us, as a publicly-traded bank holding company with $10 billion or more in total consolidated assets, to have a global risk management framework commensurate with their structure, risk profile, complexity, activities, and size. The risk management framework must include risk management policies and procedures, as well as processes and controls to implement them. Accordingly, we have adopted a compliant risk management framework.

Payment of Dividends. We are a legal entity separate and distinct from our bank subsidiary and other affiliated entities. The principal sources of our cash flow, including cash flow to pay dividends to our shareholders, are dividends that our bank subsidiary pays to us as its sole shareholder. Statutory and regulatory limitations apply to the dividends that our bank subsidiary can pay to us, as well as to the dividends we can pay to our shareholders.

The policy of the Federal Reserve Board that a bank holding company should serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary bank also results in the position of the Federal Reserve Board that a bank holding company should not maintain a level of cash dividends to its shareholders that places undue pressure on the capital of its bank subsidiary or that can be funded only through additional borrowings or other arrangements that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to serve as such a source of strength. Our ability to pay dividends is also subject to the provisions of Arkansas law.

There are certain state-law limitations on the payment of dividends by our bank subsidiary. Centennial Bank, which is subject to Arkansas banking laws, may not declare or pay a dividend of 75% or more of the net profits of such bank after all taxes for the current year plus 75% of the retained net profits for the immediately preceding year without the prior approval of the Arkansas State Bank Commissioner (the “Bank Commissioner”). Members of the Federal Reserve System must also comply with the dividend restrictions with which a national bank would be required to comply. Among other things, these restrictions require that if losses have at any time been sustained by a bank equal to or exceeding its undivided profits then on hand, no dividend may be paid. Although we have historically paid quarterly dividends on our common stock, there can be no assurances that we will be able to pay dividends in the future under the applicable regulatory limitations.

The payment of dividends by us, or by our bank subsidiary, may also be affected by other factors, such as the requirement to maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines. The federal banking agencies have indicated that paying dividends that deplete a depository institution’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. Under FDICIA, as discussed below, a depository institution may not pay any dividend if payment would result in the depository institution being undercapitalized.

16

Acquisitions of Banks. The Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the Federal Reserve Board’s prior approval before:

•acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if, after the acquisition, the bank holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the bank’s voting shares;

•acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of any bank; or

•merging or consolidating with any other bank holding company.

Under the Bank Holding Company Act, if well-capitalized and well managed, we, as well as other bank holding companies located within the states in which we operate, may purchase a bank located outside of those states. Conversely, a well-capitalized and well managed bank holding company located outside of the states in which we operate may purchase a bank located inside those states. In each case, however, restrictions may be placed on the acquisition of a bank that has only been in existence for a limited amount of time or will result in specified concentrations of deposits. In approving bank acquisitions by bank holding companies, the Federal Reserve Board is required to consider, among other things, the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding company and the banks concerned, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served and various competitive factors.

Subsidiary Bank

General. Our bank subsidiary, Centennial Bank, is chartered as an Arkansas state bank and is a member of the Federal Reserve System, making it primarily subject to regulation and supervision by both the Federal Reserve Board and the Arkansas State Bank Department. In addition, our bank subsidiary is subject to various requirements and restrictions under federal and state law, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types and amounts of loans that may be granted and the interest that they may charge, and limitations on the types of investments they may make and on the types of services they may offer. Various consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of our bank subsidiary. Further, because our bank subsidiary has total assets of over $10 billion, it is subject to supervision and regulation by the CFPB, which is responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer protection laws.

Deposit Insurance and Assessments. Centennial Bank’s deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the deposit coverage limit to $250,000 per depositor retroactive to January 1, 2008.

The FDIC imposes an assessment against institutions for deposit insurance. This assessment is based primarily on the risk category of the institution and certain risk adjustments specified by the FDIC, with riskier institutions paying higher assessments. Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions with at least $10 billion in assets are assessed on the basis of a scoring system that combines the institution’s regulatory ratings and certain financial measures. The scoring system assesses risk measures to produce two scores, a performance score and a loss severity score, that will be combined and converted to an initial assessment rate. The performance score measures an institution’s financial performance and its ability to withstand stress. The loss severity score quantifies the relative magnitude of potential losses to the FDIC in the event of an institution’s failure. Once the performance and loss severity scores are calculated, these scores will be converted to a total score. The FDIC has the authority to raise or lower assessment rates, subject to limits, and to impose special additional assessments.

In 2011, the FDIC approved a final rule implementing changes to the deposit insurance assessment system, as authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act, which, among other things, changed the assessment base for insured depository institutions from adjusted domestic deposits to the institution’s average consolidated total assets during an assessment period less average tangible equity capital (Tier 1 capital) during that period. The rule revised the assessment rate schedule so that it ranged from 2.5 basis points for the least risky institutions to 45 basis points for the riskiest institutions. The rule also suspended indefinitely the requirement of the FDIC to pay dividends from the DIF when it reaches 1.5% of insured deposits. In October 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The increased assessment is expected to improve the likelihood that the DIF reserve ratio would reach the statutory minimum of 1.35% by the deadline prescribed under the FDIC’s amended restoration plan. The new assessment rate schedules will remain in effect unless and until the reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2 percent in order to support growth in the DIF in progressing toward the FDIC’s long-term goal of a 2 percent reserve ratio. Progressively lower assessment rate schedules will take effect when the reserve ratio reaches 2 percent, and again when it reaches 2.5 percent.

17

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended, the FDIC may terminate deposit insurance upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act requires, in connection with examinations of financial institutions, that federal banking regulators evaluate the record of each financial institution in meeting the credit needs of its local community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. These facts are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions and applications to open a branch or facility. Failure to adequately meet these criteria could impose additional requirements and limitations on our bank subsidiary. Additionally, we must publicly disclose the terms of various Community Reinvestment Act-related agreements. Our bank subsidiary received a “satisfactory” CRA rating from the Federal Reserve Bank during its last exam as published in our bank’s CRA Public Evaluation.

Capital Requirements. Our bank subsidiary is also subject to certain restrictions on the payment of dividends as a result of the requirement that it maintain adequate levels of capital in accordance with guidelines promulgated from time to time by applicable regulators. The regulating agencies consider a bank’s capital levels when taking action on various types of applications and when conducting supervisory activities related to the safety and soundness of individual banks and the banking system. The Federal Reserve Bank monitors the capital adequacy of our bank subsidiary by using a combination of risk-based guidelines and leverage ratios.

The FDIC Improvement Act. FDICIA made a number of reforms addressing the safety and soundness of the deposit insurance system, supervision of domestic and foreign depository institutions, and improvement of accounting standards. This statute also limited deposit insurance coverage, implemented changes in consumer protection laws and provided for least-cost resolution and prompt regulatory action with regard to troubled institutions.

FDICIA requires every bank with total assets in excess of $500 million to have an annual independent audit made of the bank’s financial statements by an independent public accountant to verify that the financial statements of the bank are presented fairly and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and comply with such other disclosure requirements as prescribed by the FDIC. FDICIA also places certain restrictions on activities of banks depending on their level of capital.

The capital classification of a bank affects the frequency of examinations of the bank and impacts the ability of the bank to engage in certain activities and affects the deposit insurance premiums paid by such bank. Under FDICIA, the federal banking regulators are required to conduct a full-scope, on-site examination of every bank at least once every 12 months.

Brokered Deposits. Under FDICIA, banks may be restricted in their ability to accept brokered deposits, depending on their capital classification. “Well-capitalized” banks are permitted to accept brokered deposits, but banks that are not well-capitalized are not permitted to accept such deposits. The FDIC may, on a case-by-case basis, permit banks that are adequately capitalized to accept brokered deposits if the FDIC determines that acceptance of such deposits would not constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice with respect to the bank. The EGRRCPA, enacted in May 2018, provides that most reciprocal deposits are no longer treated as brokered deposits.

Federal Home Loan Bank System. The Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system, of which our bank subsidiary is a member, consists of regional FHLBs governed and regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA. The FHLBs serve as reserve or credit facilities for member institutions within their assigned regions. They are funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. They make loans (i.e., advances) to members in accordance with policies and procedures established by the FHLB and the boards of directors of each regional FHLB.

As a system member, our bank subsidiary is entitled to borrow from the FHLB of its region and is required to own a certain amount of capital stock in the FHLB. Our bank subsidiary is in compliance with the stock ownership rules with respect to such advances, commitments and letters of credit and home mortgage loans and similar obligations. All loans, advances and other extensions of credit made by the FHLB to our bank subsidiary are secured by a portion of its respective loan portfolio, certain other investments and the capital stock of the FHLB held by such bank.

Federal Reserve System. In January 2019, the Federal Open Market Committee announced its intention to implement monetary policy in an ample reserves regime. Reserve requirements do not play a significant role in this operating framework. In light of the shift to an ample reserves regime, the Federal Reserve reduced the reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective on March 26, 2020. As a result, the Bank is no longer required to maintain required reserve balance with either the FRB or in the form of cash on hand.

18

Concentrated Commercial Real Estate Lending Regulations. The federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have promulgated guidance governing financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that a bank has a concentration in commercial real estate lending if (1) total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100% or more of total capital or (2) total reported loans secured by multifamily and non-farm residential properties and loans for construction, land development and other land represent 300% or more of total capital and the bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months. Owner occupied loans are excluded from this second category. If a concentration is present, management must employ heightened risk management practices that address the following key elements: including board and management oversight and strategic planning, portfolio management, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, and maintenance of increased capital levels as needed to support the level of commercial real estate lending.

Mortgage Banking Operations. Our bank subsidiary is subject to the rules and regulations of FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA with respect to originating, processing, selling and servicing mortgage loans and the issuance and sale of mortgage-backed securities. Those rules and regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination and establish underwriting guidelines which include provisions for inspections and appraisals, require credit reports on prospective borrowers and fix maximum loan amounts, and, with respect to VA loans, fix maximum interest rates.

Consumer Financial Protection. Our bank subsidiary is subject to a number of federal and state consumer protection laws that extensively govern its relationship with its customers. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Service Members Civil Relief Act and these laws’ respective state-law counterparts, as well as state usury laws and laws regarding unfair and deceptive acts and practices. These and other federal laws, among other things, require disclosures of the cost of credit and terms of deposit accounts, provide substantive consumer rights, prohibit discrimination in credit transactions, regulate the use of credit report information, provide financial privacy protections, prohibit unfair, deceptive and abusive practices, restrict the bank’s ability to raise interest rates and subject the bank to substantial regulatory oversight. Violations of applicable consumer protection laws can result in significant potential liability from litigation brought by customers, including actual damages, restitution and attorneys’ fees. Federal bank regulators, state attorneys general and state and local consumer protection agencies may also seek to enforce consumer protection requirements and obtain these and other remedies, including regulatory sanctions, customer rescission rights, action by the state and local attorneys general in each jurisdiction in which our bank subsidiary operates and civil money penalties. Failure to comply with consumer protection requirements may also result in our bank subsidiary’s failure to obtain any required bank regulatory approval for merger or acquisition transactions the bank may wish to pursue or its prohibition from engaging in such transactions even if approval is not required.

The Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB, which has supervisory authority over depository institutions with total assets of $10 billion or greater. The CFPB focuses its supervision and regulatory efforts on (1) risks to consumers and compliance with the federal consumer financial laws when it evaluates the policies and practices of a financial institution; (2) the markets in which firms operate and risks to consumers posed by activities in those markets; (3) depository institutions that offer a wide variety of consumer financial products and services; (4) certain depository institutions with a more specialized focus; and (5) non-depository companies that offer one or more consumer financial products or services.

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer financial laws that apply to all banks, including, among other things, the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. Abusive acts or practices are defined as those that materially interfere with a consumer’s ability to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or service or take unreasonable advantage of a consumer’s (1) lack of financial savvy, (2) inability to protect himself in the selection or use of consumer financial products or services or (3) reasonable reliance on a covered entity to act in the consumer’s interests. The CFPB can issue cease-and-desist orders against banks and other entities that violate consumer financial laws. The CFPB may also institute a civil action against an entity in violation of federal consumer financial law in order to impose a civil penalty or injunction. The CFPB has examination and enforcement authority over all banks with more than $10 billion in assets, as well as their affiliates.

Loans to One Borrower. Our bank subsidiary generally may not make loans or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be loaned, up to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily marketable collateral, which generally does not include real estate. As of December 31, 2022, our bank subsidiary was in compliance with the loans-to-one-borrower limitations.

19

Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements. Under Regulation Y, our bank holding company and bank subsidiary are prohibited, subject to some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution.

Change in Control. Federal and state laws, including the Change in Bank Control Act, impose prior notice or approval requirements and ongoing regulatory requirements on any investor that seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured depository institution or bank holding company. “Control” of a depository institution is generally defined where an investor is deemed to control a depository institution or other company if the investor owns or controls 25% or more of any class of voting securities.

Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates. We and our bank subsidiary are subject to Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. In general, Section 23A imposes limits on the amount of transactions between the bank and its affiliates and requires certain levels of collateral for loans to affiliated parties. It also limits the amount of advances to affiliates which are collateralized by the securities or obligations of the bank or its nonbanking affiliates. An affiliate of a bank is generally any company or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the bank.

Affiliate transactions are also subject to Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act which generally requires that certain other transactions between the bank and its affiliates be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the bank, as those prevailing at that time for comparable transactions with or involving other non-affiliated persons.

Sections 22(g) and (h) of the Federal Reserve Act and its implementing regulation, Regulation O, also place restrictions on loans by a bank to executive officers, directors, and principal shareholders. Under Section 22(h), loans to a director, an executive officer and to a greater than 10% shareholder of a bank and certain of their related interests, or insiders, and insiders of affiliates, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such person and related interests, the bank’s loans-to-one-borrower limit. Section 22(h) also requires that loans to insiders and to insiders of affiliates be made on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons, unless the loans are made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that (i) is widely available to employees of the bank and (ii) does not give preference to insiders over other employees of the bank. In addition, Section 22(h) requires prior board of director’s approval for certain loans, and the aggregate amount of extensions of credit by a bank to all insiders cannot exceed the institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore, Section 22(g) places additional restrictions on loans to executive officers.

Interchange Fees. Under the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve Board adopted rules establishing standards for assessing whether the interchange fees that may be charged with respect to certain electronic debit transactions are “reasonable and proportional” to the costs incurred by issuers for processing such transactions. Interchange fees, or “swipe” fees, are charges that merchants pay to our bank subsidiary and other card-issuing banks for processing electronic payment transactions. Federal Reserve Board rules applicable to financial institutions that have assets of $10 billion or more provide that the maximum permissible interchange fee is equal to no more than 21 cents plus 5 basis points of the transaction value for many types of debit interchange transactions. A debit card issuer may also recover 1 cent per transaction for fraud prevention purposes if the issuer complies with certain fraud-related requirements required by the Federal Reserve. In addition, the Federal Reserve has rules governing routing and exclusivity that require issuers to offer two unaffiliated networks for routing transactions on each debit or prepaid product.

The Volcker Rule. The Dodd-Frank Act prohibits banks and their affiliates from engaging in proprietary trading and investing in and sponsoring hedge funds and private equity funds. The statutory provision, which has been implemented by rules adopted by federal regulators, is commonly called the “Volcker Rule.” The Volcker Rule also requires covered banking entities, including us and our bank subsidiary, to implement certain compliance programs, and the complexity and rigor of such programs is determined based on the asset size and complexity of the business of the covered company. Since neither we nor our bank subsidiary engages in the types of trading or investing covered by the Volcker Rule, the Volcker Rule does not currently have any effect on our or our bank subsidiary’s operations.

Privacy. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, financial institutions are required to disclose their policies for collecting and protecting confidential information. Customers generally may prevent financial institutions from sharing nonpublic personal financial information with nonaffiliated third parties except under narrow circumstances, such as the processing of transactions requested by the consumer or when the financial institution is jointly sponsoring a product or service with a nonaffiliated third party. Additionally, financial institutions generally may not disclose consumer account numbers to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing to consumers. We and our subsidiary have established policies and procedures to assure our compliance with all privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

20

We are also subject to various regulatory guidance as updated from time to time and implemented by the Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council (the “FFIEC”), an interagency body of the FDIC, the OCC, the Federal Reserve, the National Credit Union Administration and various state regulatory authorities. The FFIEC has provided guidance in areas such as data privacy, disaster recovery, information security, and third-party vendor management to identify potential risks related to our services that could adversely affect our customers. In addition, lawmakers, regulators and the public are increasingly focused on the use of personal information and efforts to strengthen data protection, information security and consumer and personal privacy. The law in these areas continues to develop, and we expect regulation in these areas to continue to increase.

Anti-Terrorism and Anti-Money Laundering Legislation. Our bank subsidiary is subject to the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”), the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and rules and regulations of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (the “OFAC”). These statutes and related rules and regulations impose requirements and limitations on specific financial transactions and account relationships intended to guard against money laundering, terrorism financing and transactions with designated foreign countries, nationals and others on whom the United States has imposed economic sanctions. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution, including causing applicable bank regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions when regulatory approval is required or to prohibit such transactions even if approval is not required.

As part of our bank subsidiary’s anti-money laundering (“AML”) program, we are required to designate a BSA officer, maintain a BSA/AML training program, maintain internal controls to effectuate the BSA/AML program, implement independent testing of the BSA/AML program, and comply with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s “Customer Due Diligence for Financial Institutions Rule” (the “CDD Rule”). The CDD Rule adds a new requirement for our bank subsidiary to identify and verify the identity of natural persons (“beneficial owners”) of legal entity customers who own, control and profit from companies when those companies open accounts. The CDD Rule requires covered financial institutions to establish and maintain written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to (1) identify and verify the identity of customers; (2) identify and verify the identity of the beneficial owners of companies opening accounts; (3) understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships to develop customer risk profiles; and (4) conduct ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, to maintain and update customer information. With respect to the new requirement to obtain beneficial ownership information, financial institutions will have to identify and verify the identity of any individuals who own 25 percent or more of a legal entity, and an individual who controls the legal entity.

Incentive Compensation. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal bank regulators and the SEC to establish joint regulations or guidelines prohibiting incentive-based payment arrangements at specified regulated entities having at least $1 billion in total assets that encourage inappropriate risks by providing an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits or that could lead to material financial loss to the entity. In addition, these regulators must establish regulations or guidelines requiring enhanced disclosure to regulators of incentive-based compensation arrangements.

In June 2010, the Federal Reserve and FDIC issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The guidance, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should (1) provide incentives that appropriately balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage employees to expose their organizations to imprudent risk, (2) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management and (3) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors.

In May 2016, the Federal Reserve, other federal banking agencies and the SEC jointly published a revised version of proposed rulemaking initially issued in April 2011 designed to implement the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act prohibiting incentive compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risk taking at a covered institution, which includes a bank or bank holding company with $1 billion or more of assets, such as the Company and our bank subsidiary. The proposed joint compensation regulations would require compensation practices consistent with the three principles discussed above. As of February 1, 2023, these regulations have not been finalized. Unless and until a final rule is adopted, we cannot fully determine whether compliance with such a rule will adversely affect the Company’s or our bank subsidiary’s ability to hire, retain and motivate our key employees.

21

In October 2022, the SEC adopted a final rule directing national securities exchanges and associations, including the NYSE, to implement listing standards that require listed companies to adopt policies mandating the recovery or “clawback” of excess incentive-based compensation earned by a current or former executive officer during the three fiscal years preceding the date the listed company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, including to correct an error that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. The final rule requires us to adopt a clawback policy within 60 days after such listing standard becomes effective.

The Federal Reserve Board reviews, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as the Company, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews are tailored to each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of this supervisory initiative will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies.

Customer Information Security. The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines for safeguarding confidential, personal, nonpublic customer information. These guidelines require each financial institution, under the supervision and ongoing oversight of its board of directors or an appropriate committee thereof, to create, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazard to the security or integrity of such information and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer. Our bank subsidiary has adopted a customer information security program to comply with these requirements.

Arkansas Law. Our bank subsidiary is subject to regulation and examination by the Arkansas State Bank Department. Under the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997, approval of the Bank Commissioner is required for the acquisition of more than 25% of any class of the outstanding capital stock of any bank. The Bank Commissioner’s approval is also required in order for us to make bank acquisitions, amend our articles of incorporation, repurchase shares of our capital stock (other than payments to dissenting shareholders in a transaction), issue preferred stock or debt, increase, reduce or retire any part of our capital stock, retire debt instruments, or conduct certain types of activities that are incidental or closely related to banking. The Bank Commissioner has the authority, with the consent of the Governor of the State of Arkansas, to declare a state of emergency and temporarily modify or suspend banking laws and regulations in communities where such a state of emergency exists. The Bank Commissioner may also authorize a bank to close its offices and any day when such bank offices are closed will be treated as a legal holiday, and any director, officer or employee of such bank shall not incur any liability related to such emergency closing. No such state of emergency has been declared to exist by the Bank Commissioner to date.

Regulatory Developments Relating to the CARES Act

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law on March 27, 2020 to provide national emergency economic relief measures. The CARES Act’s programs were implemented through rules and guidance adopted by federal departments and agencies, including the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and other federal bank regulatory authorities, including those with direct supervisory jurisdiction over the Company and its bank subsidiary. Set forth below is a brief overview of select provisions of the CARES Act and other regulations and supervisory guidance related to the COVID-19 pandemic that are applicable to the operations and activities of the Company and its bank subsidiary.

Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). The CARES Act established a new federal economic relief program administered by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) called the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), which provided for 100% federally guaranteed loans to be issued by participating private financial institutions to small businesses for payroll and certain other permitted expenses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our bank subsidiary participated in the PPP as a lender. These loans are eligible to be forgiven if certain conditions are satisfied and are fully guaranteed by the SBA. Additionally, loan payments were deferred for the first six months of the loan term. The PPP commenced on April 3, 2020 and was available to qualified borrowers through May 31, 2021. No collateral or personal guarantees were required. Neither the government nor lenders were permitted to charge the recipients any fees. As of December 31, 2022, our bank subsidiary has approximately $7.3 million in PPP loans that remain outstanding.

22

Temporary Regulatory Capital Relief related to Impact of Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”). Concurrent with enactment of the CARES Act, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued an interim final rule that delays the estimated impact on regulatory capital resulting from the implementation of CECL. The interim final rule maintains the three-year transition option in the previous rule and provides banking organizations that implemented CECL during 2020 the option to delay for two years the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital, relative to the incurred loss methodology’s effect on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period to phase out the aggregate amount of capital benefit provided during the initial two-year delay. We adopted CECL on January 1, 2020 and have elected to utilize the five-year transition option.

Proposed Legislation and Regulatory Action

From time to time, various legislative and regulatory initiatives are introduced in Congress and state legislatures, as well as by regulatory agencies. Such initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract the powers of bank holding companies and depository institutions or proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory system. Such legislation could change banking statutes and the operating environment for us and our bank subsidiary in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions. We cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed regulation or statute will be adopted or the extent to which our business may be affected by any new regulation or statute.

Effect of Governmental Monetary Polices

Our earnings are affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government and its agencies. The Federal Reserve Board’s monetary policies have had, and are likely to continue to have, an important impact on the operating results of commercial banks through its power to implement national monetary policy in order, among other things, to curb inflation or combat a recession. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board affect the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits through its control over the issuance of United States government securities, its regulation of the discount rate applicable to banks and its influence over reserve requirements to which banks are subject. We cannot predict the nature or impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, we file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. In addition, we maintain a website at http://www.homebancshares.com. We make available on our website copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such documents as soon as practicable after we electronically file such materials with or furnish such documents to the SEC.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business exposes us to certain risks. Risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on may also adversely affect our business and operation. The following is a discussion of the most significant risks and uncertainties that may affect our business, financial condition and future results.

Risks Related to Our Industry

We are subject to extensive regulation that could limit or restrict our activities and impose financial requirements or limitations on the conduct of our business, and changes in the laws and regulations to which we are subject could adversely affect our profitability.

We and our bank subsidiary are subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. As a registered bank holding company, we are primarily regulated by the Federal Reserve Board. Our bank subsidiary is also primarily regulated by the Federal Reserve Board and the Arkansas State Bank Department.

Banking industry regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not security holders. Complying with such regulations is costly and may limit our growth and restrict certain of our activities, including payment of dividends, mergers and acquisitions, investments, loans and interest rates charged, interest rates paid on deposits and locations of offices. We are also subject to capital requirements by our regulators. Violations of various laws, even if unintentional, may result in significant fines or other penalties, including restrictions on branching or bank acquisitions.

23

Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. The Dodd-Frank Act, passed by Congress in 2010, instituted major changes to the banking and financial institutions regulatory regimes in light of the performance of and government intervention in the financial services sector during the economic recession leading up to its enactment. The act required the issuance of a substantial number of new regulations by federal regulatory agencies affecting financial institutions, some of which still have yet to be issued or implemented.

While the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act enacted in 2018 reduced certain regulatory burdens on community and regional financial institutions resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act, we cannot assure that future legislation will not significantly increase our compliance or operating costs or otherwise have a significant impact on our business. Certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations promulgated under the act may continue to be implemented, and there could be additional new federal or state laws, regulations and policies regarding lending and funding practices and liquidity standards. Additionally, financial institution regulatory agencies have intensified their response to concerns and trends identified in examinations, including through the issuance of formal enforcement actions. Negative developments in the financial services industry or other new legislation or regulations could adversely impact our operations and our financial performance by subjecting us to additional costs, restricting our business operations, including our ability to originate or sell loans, and/or increasing the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services.

As regulation of the banking industry continues to evolve, we expect the costs of compliance to continue to increase and, thus, to affect our ability to operate profitably. In addition, industry, legislative or regulatory developments may cause us to materially change our existing strategic direction, capital strategies, compensation or operating plans. If these developments negatively impact our ability to implement our business strategies, it may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and future prospects.

We are subject to heightened regulatory requirements as our total assets exceed $10 billion.

Because our total assets exceed $10 billion, we and our bank subsidiary are subject to increased regulatory requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations impose various additional requirements on bank holding companies with $10 billion or more in total assets. In addition, banks with $10 billion or more in total assets are primarily examined by the CFPB with respect to various federal consumer financial protection laws and regulations. Previously, our bank subsidiary had been subject to regulations adopted by the CFPB, but the Federal Reserve was primarily responsible for examining our bank subsidiary’s compliance with consumer protection laws and those CFPB regulations. As a relatively new agency with evolving regulations and practices, the CFPB’s examination and regulatory authority has been and continues to be the subject of policy debates and uncertainty among lawmakers and differing presidential administrations, and thus we cannot ascertain the impact, if any, that future changes to the CFPB may have on our business.

Banks with assets in excess of $10 billion are subject to a deposit assessment based on a scorecard issued by the FDIC that considers, among other things, the bank’s CAMELS rating, results of asset-related stress testing and funding-related stress, as well as our use of core deposits, among other things. Depending on the results of the bank’s performance under that scorecard, the total base assessment rate is between 2.5 to 42 basis points. Any increase in our bank subsidiary’s deposit insurance assessments may result in an increased expense related to our use of deposits as a funding source. Additionally, banks with over $10 billion in total assets are no longer exempt from the requirements of the Federal Reserve’s rules on interchange transaction fees for debit cards. Our bank subsidiary is limited to receiving only a “reasonable” interchange transaction fee for any debit card transactions processed using debit cards issued by our bank subsidiary to our customers. The Federal Reserve has determined that it is unreasonable for a bank with more than $10 billion in total assets to receive more than $0.21 plus 5 basis points of the transaction plus a $0.01 fraud adjustment for an interchange transaction fee for debit card transactions. This limit in the amount of interchange fees we receive for electronic debit interchange has the effect of reducing our revenues.

Prior to becoming subject to the heightened regulatory requirements, we hired additional compliance personnel and implemented structural initiatives to address these requirements. While some of these requirements, such as annual stress testing, were eliminated by the reforms enacted in May 2018, our continued compliance with the remaining requirements and compliance with any additional requirements that may be imposed in the future may necessitate that we hire additional compliance or other personnel, design and implement additional internal controls, or incur other significant expenses, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our regulators may also consider our compliance with these regulatory requirements when examining our operations generally or considering any request for regulatory approval we may make, even requests for approvals on unrelated matters.

24

Difficult market and economic conditions may adversely affect our industry and our business.

Economic downturns historically have had a significant adverse impact on the banking industry, and particularly community banks. Declines in the housing market, with falling home prices and increased delinquencies and foreclosures, can negatively impact the credit performance of mortgage and construction loans and result in significant write-downs of assets by financial institutions. Any reduced availability of commercial credit or periods of sustained higher unemployment can further negatively impact the credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional write-downs. Any such market conditions could cause commercial and consumer deficiencies, low customer confidence, market volatility and generally sluggish business activity in our industry.

Unlike larger financial institutions that are more geographically diversified, our profitability depends primarily on the general economic conditions in our primary market areas. Local economic conditions have a significant impact on our residential real estate, commercial real estate, construction, commercial and industrial and consumer lending, including, the ability of borrowers to repay these loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans. Certain economic indicators, such as real estate asset values, rents and unemployment, may vary between geographic markets and may lag behind the overall economy. These economic indicators typically affect certain industries, such as real estate and financial services, more significantly than other economic sectors. Additionally, our success significantly depends upon the growth in population, income levels, deposits and housing starts in our markets. If the communities in which we operate do not grow or if prevailing economic conditions deteriorate locally or nationally, our business may be adversely affected. We are less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. The adverse effects of any future economic downturn on us, our customers and the other financial institutions in our market may result in increased foreclosures, delinquencies and customer bankruptcies as well as more restricted access to funds. Any such negative events may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.

The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted U.S. and global supply chains and altered business and economic conditions throughout the U.S. and globally. Its economic impacts lowered equity market valuations; created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets; contributed to a decrease in the rates and yields on U.S. Treasury securities; resulted in ratings downgrades, credit deterioration, and defaults in many industries; increased demands on capital and liquidity; increased unemployment levels and decreased consumer confidence. In addition, the pandemic resulted in temporary or permanent closures of many businesses, the institution of social distancing, face covering requirements and other health directives, and in some cases, self-isolation requirements. The pandemic also caused us to recognize credit losses in our loan portfolios and increases in our allowance for credit losses.

Given the nature of COVID-19 variants, it is difficult to predict whether or when any future outbreaks of the virus may occur or the impacts that any such outbreak may have on our business. Any impact will depend on future developments, including the long-term scope, severity and duration of the outbreak, the success of vaccination, treatment and other mitigation efforts, any further actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the economic and health effects of the pandemic, and the long-term financial impact of the pandemic on our customers, employees, counterparties and service providers. As part of these uncertainties, we could be subject to a number of risks, any of which could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and ability to execute our growth strategy. These risks include, but are not limited to, increased loan losses or other impairments in our loan portfolios and increases in our allowance for loan losses; further volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans; impairment of our goodwill and our financial assets; increased cost of capital; inability to satisfy our minimum regulatory capital ratios and other supervisory requirements; or a downgrade in our credit ratings. We could also face an increased risk of governmental and regulatory scrutiny as a result of the effects of the pandemic on market and economic conditions and actions governmental authorities take in response to those conditions.

Even as the economic and health impacts of the coronavirus subside, we could experience future volatility in the economy or a prolonged recession that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations.

25

Our FDIC insurance premiums and assessments could increase and result in higher noninterest expense.

Our bank subsidiary’s deposits are insured by the FDIC up to legal limits, and accordingly, we are subject to FDIC deposit insurance assessments. As our bank subsidiary exceeds $10 billion in assets, we are subject to higher FDIC assessments. Our bank subsidiary’s regular assessments are calculated under the large bank pricing rule using its average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity as well as by risk classification, which includes regulatory capital levels.

We are generally unable to control the amount and timetable for payment of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. There is no guarantee that our assessment rate will not increase in the future. Additionally, if there is an increase in bank or financial institution failures or there is a future need to strengthen the DIF reserve ratio, the FDIC may further revise the assessment rates or the risk-based assessment system. Such changes may require us to pay higher FDIC premiums than our current levels, or the FDIC may charge additional special assessments, either of which would increase our noninterest expense.

Our profitability is vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations and monetary policy and could be adversely affected by any future actions taken by the Federal Reserve Board to address rising inflation.

Our results of operations are affected by the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board. Most of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature, and thus subject us to significant risks from changes in interest rates. Consequently, our results of operations can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates and our ability to manage interest rate risk. Changes in market interest rates, changes in the relationships between short-term and long-term market interest rates, or changes in the relationship between different interest rate indices can affect the interest rates charged on interest-earning assets differently than the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. This difference could result in an increase in interest expense relative to interest income or a decrease in interest rate spread. In addition to affecting our profitability, changes in interest rates can impact the valuation of our assets and liabilities. Changes in interest rates can also affect our business and profitability in numerous other ways. For example, increases in interest rates can have a negative impact on our results of operations by reducing loan demand and the ability of borrowers to repay their current obligations, while decreases in interest rates may affect loan prepayments.

In response to recent inflation and its affects on U.S. business and consumers, the Federal Reserve Board has implemented eight interest rate increases since March 2022. It is widely anticipated that the Federal Reserve will implement multiple additional interest rate increases during 2023. While we experienced loan growth during 2022 through acquisitions and organically sufficient to more than offset our increased interest expense and overall loan demand has remained relatively strong, there can be no assurance that any such future actions by the Federal Reserve Board involving monetary policies will not cause any of the adverse effects described above on our deposit levels, loan demand or business and earnings.

We may be adversely impacted by the transition from the use of the LIBOR interest rate index in the future.

We have certain loans, investment securities and subordinated debt securities indexed to LIBOR to calculate the interest rate. The continued availability of the LIBOR index is not guaranteed after the United Kingdom administrators of LIBOR have announced that the publication of the most commonly used U.S. dollar LIBOR settings will cease to be published after June 2023. We cannot predict, in the interim, whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide LIBOR submissions to the administrator of LIBOR or whether any additional reforms to LIBOR may be enacted. With respect to our loan assets, at this time, there is some industry guidance regarding acceptable alternatives to LIBOR. After review and analysis from the Federal Reserve Board’s Alternative Reference Rates Committee, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau published its final rule recommending the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as a compliant replacement index to LIBOR that would not trigger a refinance under existing regulations for certain consumer loans. Loan contracts may also contain alternate rate language permitting transfer to SOFR, Wall Street Journal Prime or another index when LIBOR is no longer available. The timing and manner in which each customer’s contract transitions to a new index will vary on a case-by-case basis. There continues to be some uncertainty related to the LIBOR transition. New index rates and payments will differ from LIBOR, which may lead to increased volatility. The transition has impacted our market risk profiles and required changes to our risk and pricing models, valuation tools, and product design. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with our customers could adversely impact our reputation. With respect to investment securities and subordinated debt securities, we expect similar transition issues. Failure to adequately manage the transition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

26

Risks Related to Our Business

Our decisions regarding credit risk could be inaccurate and our allowance for credit losses may be inadequate, which would materially and adversely affect us.

Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of our secured loans. We endeavor to maintain an allowance for credit losses that we consider adequate to absorb future losses that may occur in our loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2022, our allowance for credit losses was approximately $289.7 million, or 2.01% of our total loans. In determining the size of the allowance, we analyze our loan portfolio based on our historical loss experience, volume and classification of loans, volume and trends in delinquencies and non-accruals, national and local economic conditions, and other pertinent information.

If our assumptions are incorrect, our current allowance may be insufficient to absorb future loan losses, and increased loan loss reserves may be needed to respond to different economic conditions or adverse developments in our loan portfolio. When there is an economic downturn, it is more difficult for us to estimate the losses that we will experience in our loan portfolio. In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require us to increase our allowance for credit losses or recognize further loan charge-offs based on judgments different than those of our management. Any increase in our allowance for credit losses or loan charge-offs could have a negative effect on our operating results.

Our high concentration of real estate loans and especially commercial real estate loans exposes us to increased lending risk.

As of December 31, 2022, approximately 72.5% of our total loan portfolio was comprised of loans with real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral. This includes commercial real estate loans (excluding construction/land development) of $5.98 billion, or 41.5% of total loans, construction/land development loans of $2.14 billion, or 14.8% of total loans, and residential real estate loans of $2.33 billion, or 16.1% of total loans. This high concentration of real estate loans could subject us to increased credit risk in the event of a decrease in real estate values in our markets, a real estate recession or a natural disaster. Also, in any such event, our ability to recover on defaulted loans by foreclosing and selling real estate collateral would be diminished, and we would be more likely to suffer losses on defaulted loans.

In addition to the risks associated with the high concentration of real estate-secured loans, the commercial real estate and construction/land development loans, which comprised 56.3% of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2022, expose us to a greater risk of loss than our residential real estate loans, which comprised 16.1% of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2022. Commercial real estate and land development loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to residential loans. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one commercial loan or one credit relationship exposes us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to one residential mortgage loan.

The repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related real estate or commercial project. If the cash flows from the project are reduced, a borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. This cash flow shortage may result in the failure to make loan payments. In such cases, we may be compelled to modify the terms of the loan, or in the most extreme cases, we may have to foreclose.

If a decline in economic conditions or other issues cause difficulties for our borrowers of these types of loans, if we fail to evaluate the credit of these loans accurately when we underwrite them or if we do not continue to adequately monitor the performance of these loans, our lending portfolio could experience delinquencies, defaults and credit losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our geographic concentration of banking activities and loan portfolio makes us more vulnerable to adverse conditions in our local markets.

Our bank subsidiary operates through branch locations in Arkansas, Florida, Texas, Alabama and New York City and loan production offices in Los Angeles, California, Dallas, Texas, Miami, Florida, Chesapeake, Virginia and Baltimore, Maryland. However, approximately 79.7% of our total loans and 84.6% of our real estate loans as of December 31, 2022, are to borrowers whose collateral is located in Arkansas, Florida, Texas, Alabama and New York, the states in which the Company has its branch locations. An adverse development with respect to the market conditions of any of these specific market areas or a decrease in real estate values in those market areas could expose us to a greater risk of loss than a portfolio that is spread among a larger geographic base.

27

If the value of real estate were to deteriorate, a significant portion of our loans could become under-collateralized, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

As of December 31, 2022, approximately 72.5% of our total loans were secured by real estate. In prior years, difficult local economic conditions have adversely affected the values of our real estate collateral, and they could do so again if the economic conditions markets were to deteriorate in the future. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment on our loans in the event of default by the borrower but may deteriorate in value during the time credit is extended. If we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, our earnings and capital could be adversely affected.

Because we have a concentration of exposure to a number of individual borrowers, a significant loss on any of those loans could materially and adversely affect us.

We have a concentration of exposure to a number of individual borrowers. Under applicable law, our bank subsidiary is generally permitted to make loans to one borrowing relationship up to 20% of its Tier 1 capital plus the allowance for credit losses. As of December 31, 2022, the legal lending limit of our bank subsidiary for secured loans was approximately $539.7 million. Our board of directors has established an in-house lending limit of $40.0 million to any one borrowing relationship without obtaining the approval of two of the following: our Chairman, John W. Allison, our Vice Chairman, Jack E. Engelkes, or our director Richard H. Ashley. As of December 31, 2022, we had a total of $6.46 billion, or 44.8% of our total loans, committed to the aggregate group of borrowers whose total debt exceeds the established in-house lending limit of $40.0 million.

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, interest rates and competitive pressures.

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, interest rates and competitive pressures. We have traditionally obtained funds principally through local deposits, and we have a base of lower cost transaction deposits. Generally, we believe local deposits are a more stable source of funds than other borrowings because interest rates paid for local deposits are typically lower than interest rates charged for borrowings from other institutional lenders. In addition, local deposits reflect a mix of transaction and time deposits, whereas brokered deposits typically are less stable time deposits, which may need to be replaced with higher cost funds. Our costs of funds and our profitability and liquidity are likely to be adversely affected if and to the extent we must rely upon higher cost borrowings from other institutional lenders or brokers to fund loan demand or liquidity needs, and changes in our deposit mix and growth could adversely affect our profitability and the ability to expand our loan portfolio.

The loss of key employees may materially and adversely affect us.

Our success depends significantly on our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, John W. Allison, and our executive officers, especially Brian S. Davis, J. Stephen Tipton and Kevin D. Hester plus Centennial Bank Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Tracy M. French, as well as other key Centennial Bank personnel. Centennial Bank, in particular, relies heavily on its management team’s relationships in its local communities to generate business. The loss of services from a member of our current management team may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

28

The value of securities in our investment portfolio may decline in the future.

As of December 31, 2022, we owned $4.04 billion of available-for-sale investment securities. The fair value of our available-for-sale investment securities may be adversely affected by market conditions, including changes in interest rates, and the occurrence of any events adversely affecting the issuer of particular securities in our investments portfolio. We evaluate all securities quarterly to determine if any securities in a loss position requires a provision for credit losses in accordance with ASC 326, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The Company first assesses whether it intends to sell or is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For securities that do not meet these criteria, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, the Company considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, and changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as provision for (or reversal of) credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met. Because of changing economic and market conditions affecting issuers, we may be required to record provisions for credit losses in future periods, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

As of December 31, 2022, we owned $1.29 billion of held-to-maturity investment securities. Securities held-to-maturity ("HTM"), which include any security for which we have the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity, are reported at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted to the call date to interest income using the constant effective yield method over the estimated life of the security. The Company measures expected credit losses on HTM securities on a collective basis by major security type, with each type sharing similar risk characteristics. The estimate of expected credit losses considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company has made the election to exclude accrued interest receivable on HTM securities from the estimate of credit losses and report accrued interest separately on the consolidated balance sheets. Because of changing economic and market conditions affecting issuers, we may be required to record provisions for credit losses in future periods, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our recent results do not indicate our future results and may not provide guidance to assess the risk of an investment in our common stock.

We are unlikely to sustain our historical rate of growth and may not even be able to expand our business at all. Further, our growth in prior years may distort some of our historical financial ratios and statistics. Various factors, such as economic conditions, regulatory and legislative considerations and competition, may also impede or prohibit our ability to expand our market presence. If we are not able to successfully grow our business, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We may not be able to raise the additional capital we need to grow and, as a result, our ability to expand our operations could be materially impaired.

Federal and state regulatory authorities require us and our bank subsidiary to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. While we believe that our existing capital (which well exceeds the federal and state capital requirements) will be sufficient to support our current operations, anticipated expansion and potential acquisitions, factors such as faster than anticipated growth, reduced earnings levels, operating losses, changes in economic conditions, revisions in regulatory requirements, or additional acquisition opportunities may lead us to seek additional capital.

Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on our financial performance and on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control. If we need additional capital but cannot raise it on terms acceptable to us, our ability to expand our operations could be materially impaired, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected, and our stock price may decline.

29

Our growth and expansion strategy may not be successful, and our market value and profitability may suffer.

Growth through the acquisition of banks or specific bank assets or liabilities, including FDIC-assisted transactions, and de novo branching represent important components of our business strategy. Bank acquisitions are subject to regulatory approval, and we cannot assure that we will be able to obtain approval for a proposed acquisition in a timely manner or at all. Any future acquisitions we might make will also be accompanied by other risks commonly encountered in acquisitions. These risks include, among other things:

•credit risk associated with the acquired bank’s loans and investments;

•the use of inaccurate estimates and judgments to evaluate credit, operations, management and market risks with respect to the target institution or assets;

•the potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities related to the acquisition;

•the time and expense required to integrate an acquisition;

•the effectiveness of integrating operations, personnel and customers;

•risks of impairment to goodwill or other than temporary impairment; and

•potential disruption of our ongoing business.

We expect that competition for suitable acquisition candidates may be significant. We may compete with other banks or financial service companies with similar acquisition strategies, many of which are larger and have greater financial and other resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets on acceptable terms and conditions.

We may continue to have opportunities from time to time to acquire the assets and liabilities of failed banks in FDIC-assisted transactions. These acquisitions involve risks similar to acquiring existing banks even though the FDIC might provide assistance to mitigate certain risks such as sharing in exposure to loan losses and providing indemnification against certain liabilities of the failed institution. However, because these acquisitions are structured in a manner that would not allow us the time normally associated with preparing for integration of an acquired institution, we may face additional risks in FDIC-assisted transactions. These risks include, among other things, the loss of customers, strain on management resources related to collection and management of problem loans and problems related to integration of personnel and operating systems.

In addition to the acquisition of existing financial institutions or their assets or liabilities, as opportunities arise, we may grow through de novo branching. De novo branching, and any acquisition carry with them numerous risks, including the following:

•the inability to obtain all required regulatory approvals;

•the significant upfront costs and anticipated operating losses associated with establishing a de novo branch or a new bank;

•the inability to secure the services of qualified senior management;

•the local market receptivity for branches established or banks acquired outside of those markets in which we currently maintain a material presence;

•the local economic conditions within the market to be served by the de novo branch or new bank;

•the inability to obtain attractive locations within a new market at a reasonable cost; and

•the additional strain on management resources and internal systems and controls.

We cannot assure that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with acquisitions (including FDIC-assisted transactions) and de novo branching. Our inability to overcome these risks could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our business strategy and maintain our market value and profitability.

30

If we acquire additional banks or bank assets in the future, there may be undiscovered risks or losses associated with such acquisitions which would have a negative impact upon our future income.

Our growth strategy includes strategic acquisitions of banks or bank assets. We have acquired 23 banks since we started our first subsidiary bank in 1999, including a total of 18 banks since 2010. We completed the acquisition of Happy Bancshares, headquartered in Amarillo, Texas, during the second quarter of 2022. We will continue to consider future strategic acquisitions, with a primary focus on Texas, Arkansas, Florida, Alabama and other nearby markets. In most cases, our acquisition of a bank includes the acquisition of all or a substantial portion of the target bank’s assets and liabilities, including all or a substantial portion of its loan portfolio, although we have in the past acquired and may in the future acquire specific lending divisions or loan portfolios. There may be instances when we, under our normal operating procedures, may find after the acquisition that there may be additional losses or undisclosed liabilities with respect to the assets and liabilities of the target bank, and, with respect to its loan portfolio, that the ability of a borrower to repay a loan may have become impaired, the quality of the value of the collateral securing a loan may fall below our standards, or our determination of the fair value of any such loan may be inadequate. One or more of these factors might cause us to have additional losses or liabilities, additional loan charge-offs, or increases in our allowance for credit losses, which would have a negative impact upon our financial condition and results of operations.

If the goodwill that we may record or have recorded in connection with a business acquisition becomes impaired, it could require charges to earnings.

When we acquire a business, a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition is generally allocated to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. The amount of the purchase price that is allocated to goodwill and other intangible assets is determined by the excess of the purchase price over the net identifiable assets acquired. At December 31, 2022, our goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets were $1.46 billion. Under current accounting standards, if we determine goodwill or intangible assets are impaired because, for example, the acquired business does not meet projected revenue targets or certain key employees leave, we are required to write down the carrying value of these assets. We conduct a review at least annually to determine whether goodwill is impaired. Our annual goodwill impairment evaluation performed during the fourth quarter of 2022 indicated no impairment of goodwill for our reporting segments. We cannot provide assurance, however, that we will not be required to take an impairment charge in the future. Any impairment charge would have an adverse effect on our shareholders’ equity and financial results and could cause a decline in our stock price.

Competition from other financial institutions and financial service providers may adversely affect our profitability.

We face substantial competition in all phases of our operations from a variety of different competitors. We experience strong competition, not only from commercial banks, savings and loan associations and credit unions, but also from mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds and other financial services providers operating in or near our market areas. We compete with these institutions both in attracting deposits and in making loans.

Many of our competitors are much larger national and regional financial institutions. We may face a competitive disadvantage against them as a result of our smaller size and resources and our lack of geographic diversification. Due to their size, larger competitors can achieve economies of scale and may offer a broader range of products and services or more attractive pricing than us. If we are unable to offer competitive products and services, our business may be negatively affected. Many of our competitors are not subject to the same degree of regulation that we are as an FDIC-insured institution, which gives them greater operating flexibility and reduces their expenses relative to ours. As a result, these non-bank competitors have certain advantages over us in accessing funding and in providing various services.

We also compete against community banks that have strong local ties. These smaller institutions are likely to cater to the same small and mid-sized businesses that we target and to use a relationship-based approach similar to ours. In addition, our competitors may seek to gain market share by pricing below the current market rates for loans and paying higher rates for deposits. The banking business in our primary market areas is very competitive, and the level of competition facing us may increase further, which may limit our asset growth and financial results.

31

We continually encounter technological change, and we may have fewer resources than many of our competitors to continue to invest in technological improvements and innovations.

The financial services industry continues to undergo rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, including innovative ways that customers can make payments or manage their accounts, such as through the use of digital wallets or digital currencies. In addition to better serving customers, effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our clients, which may adversely affect our results of operations and future prospects.

A failure in or breach of our operational or security systems, or those of our third-party service providers, including as a result of cyber-attacks, could disrupt our business, result in unintentional disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, damage our reputation, increase our costs and cause losses.

As a financial institution, our operations rely heavily on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information on our computer systems and networks. Any failure, interruption or breach in security or operational integrity of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our online banking system, customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit and loan servicing and other systems. The security and integrity of our systems could be threatened by a variety of interruptions or information security breaches, including those caused by computer hacking, cyber-attacks, electronic fraudulent activity or attempted theft of financial assets. Our information systems have from time to time experienced such interruptions or breaches despite our best efforts to prevent them. We cannot assure you that any future failures, interruption or security breaches will not occur, or if they do occur that they will be adequately addressed. While we have certain protective policies and procedures in place, the nature and sophistication of the threats continue to evolve. We may be required to expend significant additional resources in the future to modify and enhance our protective measures.

Additionally, we face the risk of operational disruption, failure, termination or capacity constraints of any of the third parties that facilitate our business activities, including exchanges, clearing agents, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries. Such parties could also be the source of an attack on, or breach of, our operational systems. Any failures, interruptions or security breaches in our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, result in a violation of privacy or other laws, or expose us to civil litigation, regulatory fines or losses not covered by insurance.

Future hurricanes or other adverse weather events could negatively affect our local economies or disrupt our operations, which would have an adverse effect on us.

As illustrated in recent years by the impact of Hurricanes Irma, Michael and Ian, our markets in Alabama and Florida, like other coastal areas, are susceptible to hurricanes and tropical storms. Such weather events can disrupt our operations, result in damage to our properties and negatively affect the local economies in which we operate. We cannot predict whether or to what extent damage that may be caused by future hurricanes or other weather events will affect our operations or the economies in our market areas, but such weather events could result in a decline in loan originations, a decline in the value or destruction of properties or other collateral securing our loans and an increase in the delinquencies, foreclosures and loan losses. Our business or results of operations may be adversely affected by these and other negative effects of hurricanes or other significant weather events.

We may incur environmental liabilities with respect to properties to which we take title.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property. In the course of our business, we may own or foreclose and take title to real estate and could become subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. In addition, we acquire branches and real estate in connection with our acquisitions of banks. We may become responsible to a governmental agency or third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up costs incurred by those parties in connection with environmental contamination or may be required to investigate or clean-up hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with environmental investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. If we were to become subject to significant environmental liabilities, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

32

Our operations could be interrupted if certain external vendors on which we rely experience difficulty, terminate their services or fail to comply with banking laws and regulations.

We depend to a significant extent on relationships with third party service providers. Specifically, we utilize third-party core banking services and receive credit card and debit card services, branch capture services, Internet banking services and services complementary to our banking products from various third-party service providers. If these third-party service providers experience difficulties or terminate their services and we are unable to replace them with other service providers, our operations could be interrupted. It may be difficult for us to replace some of our third-party vendors, particularly vendors providing our core banking, credit card and debit card services, in a timely manner if they were unwilling or unable to provide us with these services in the future for any reason. If an interruption were to continue for a significant period of time, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Even if we are able to replace them, it may be at higher cost to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, if a third-party provider fails to provide the services we require, fails to meet contractual requirements, such as compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or suffers a cyber-attack or other security breach, our business could suffer economic and reputational harm that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our earnings could be adversely impacted by incidences of fraud and compliance failure.

Financial institutions are inherently exposed to fraud risk. A fraud can be perpetrated by a customer of our bank subsidiary, an employee, a vendor, or members of the general public. We are most subject to fraud and compliance risk in connection with the origination of loans, ACH transactions, wire transactions, ATM transactions, and checking transactions. Our largest fraud risk, associated with the origination of loans, includes the intentional misstatement of information in property appraisals or other underwriting documentation provided to us by third parties. Compliance risk is the risk that loans are not originated in compliance with applicable laws and regulations and our standards. There can be no assurance that we can prevent or detect acts of fraud or violation of law or our compliance standards by the third parties that we deal with. Repeated incidences of fraud or compliance failures would adversely impact the performance of our loan portfolio.

Risks Related to Owning Our Stock

The rights of our common shareholders are subordinate to the holders of any debt securities that we may issue from time to time and may be subordinate to the holders of any series of preferred stock that may issue in the future.

On January 18, 2022, we issued $300.0 million of 3.125% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes, which mature in 2032, and on April 1, 2022, the Company acquired $140.0 million of subordinated notes from Happy, which mature in 2030 and carry a fixed rate of 5.500% for the first five years. Thereafter, the notes bear interest at 3-month Secured Overnight Funding Rate (SOFR) plus 5.345%, resetting quarterly. Because these subordinated notes are senior to our shares of common stock, in the event of our bankruptcy, dissolution or liquidation, the holders of any such subordinated notes then outstanding must be satisfied before any distributions can be made to the holders of our common stock.

Our board of directors has the authority to issue in the aggregate up to 5,500,000 shares of preferred stock, and to incur senior or subordinated indebtedness, generally without shareholder approval. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights that may be superior to the rights of our common stock. In addition, like our outstanding subordinated debentures, any future indebtedness that we incur would be expected to be senior to our common stock with respect to payment upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. Accordingly, common shareholders bear the risk that our future issuances of debt or equity securities or our incurrence of other borrowings will negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

We may be unable to, or choose not to, pay dividends on our common stock.

Although we have paid a quarterly dividend on our common stock since 2003 and expect to continue this practice, we cannot assure you of our ability to continue. Our ability to pay dividends depends on the following factors, among others:

•We may not have sufficient earnings since our primary source of income, the payment of dividends to us by our bank subsidiary, is subject to federal and state laws that limit the ability of that bank to pay dividends.

•Federal Reserve Board policy requires bank holding companies to pay cash dividends on common stock only out of net income available over the past year and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition.

•Before dividends may be paid on our common stock in any year, payments must be made on our subordinated debentures.

33

•Our board of directors may determine that, even though funds are available for dividend payments, retaining the funds for internal uses, such as expansion of our operations, is a better strategy.

If we fail to pay dividends, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock may be the sole opportunity for gains on an investment in our common stock. In addition, in the event our bank subsidiary becomes unable, due to regulatory restrictions, capital planning needs or otherwise, to pay dividends to us, we may not be able to service our debt, pay our other obligations or pay dividends on our common stock. Accordingly, our inability to receive dividends from our bank subsidiary could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the value of your investment in our common stock.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

There are currently no unresolved Commission staff comments received by the Company more than 180 days prior to the end of the fiscal year covered by this annual report.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The Company’s main office is located in a Company-owned 33,000 square foot building located at 719 Harkrider Street in downtown Conway, Arkansas. As of December 31, 2022, our bank subsidiary owned or leased a total of 76 branches in Arkansas, 78 branches in Florida, 63 branches in Texas, five branches in Alabama and one branch in New York City. The Company also owns or leases other buildings that provide space for operations, mortgage lending and other general purposes. We believe that our banking and other offices are in good condition and are suitable to our needs.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

While we and our bank subsidiary and other affiliates are from time to time parties to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of their business, management believes, after consultation with legal counsel, that there are no proceedings threatened or pending against us or our bank subsidiary or other affiliates that will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business or consolidated financial condition.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

34

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “HOMB.” As of February 21, 2023, there were approximately 1,776 stockholders of record of the Company’s common stock.

Our policy is to declare regular quarterly dividends based upon our earnings, financial position, capital improvements and such other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. The dividend policy is subject to change, however, and the payment of dividends is not necessarily dependent upon the availability of earnings and future financial condition. Information regarding regulatory restrictions on our ability to pay dividends is discussed in “Supervision and Regulation – Payment of Dividends.”

During the three months ended December 31, 2022, the Company utilized a portion of its stock repurchase program most recently amended and approved by the Board of Directors on January 22, 2021. The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of the Company of shares of the Company’s common stock during the periods indicated:

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period	Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share Purchased		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1)
October 1 through October 31, 2022	190,000	$	24.23	190,000	19,642,134
November 1 through November 30, 2022	150,000	25.01		150,000	19,492,134
December 1 through December 31, 2022	500,000	23.21		500,000	18,992,134
Total	840,000			840,000

(1)The above described stock repurchase program has no expiration date.

35

Performance Graph

Below is a graph which summarizes the cumulative return earned by the Company’s stockholders since December 31, 2017, compared with the cumulative total return on the Russell 2000 Index and S&P U.S. BMI Banks Index. This presentation assumes that the fair value of the investment in the Company's common stock and each index was $100.00 on December 31, 2017 and that the subsequent dividends were reinvested.

	Period Ending
Index	12/31/17	12/31/18	12/31/19	12/31/20	12/31/21	12/31/22
Home BancShares, Inc.	100.00	71.75	88.76	90.80	116.12	111.78
Russell 2000 Index	100.00	88.99	111.70	134.00	153.85	122.41
S&P U.S. BMI Banks Index	100.00	83.54	114.74	100.10	136.10	112.89

36

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Summary Consolidated Financial Data

	As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
	(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Income statement data:
Total interest income	$	877,766		$	625,171		$	675,962
Total interest expense	119,090			52,200			93,407
Net interest income	758,676			572,971			582,555
Provision for credit losses	63,585			(4,752)			129,253
Net interest income after provision for credit losses	695,091			577,723			453,302
Non-interest income	175,111			137,569			111,786
Non-interest expense	475,627			298,517			287,385
Income before income taxes	394,575			416,775			277,703
Income tax expense	89,313			97,754			63,255
Net income	$	305,262		$	319,021		$	214,448
Per share data:
Basic earnings per common share	$	1.57		$	1.94		$	1.30
Diluted earnings per common share	1.57			1.94			1.30
Book value per common share	17.33			16.90			15.78
Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP)(1)(2)	10.17			10.80			9.70
Dividends – common	0.66			0.56			0.53
Average common shares outstanding	194,694			164,501			165,373
Average diluted shares outstanding	195,019			164,858			165,373
Performance ratios:
Return on average assets	1.35		%	1.83		%	1.33		%
Return on average assets excluding intangible Amortization (non-GAAP)(3)	1.47			1.96			1.45
Return on average common equity	9.17			11.89			8.57
Return on average tangible common equity excluding intangible amortization     (non-GAAP)(1)(4)	15.63			19.20			14.59
Net interest margin(5)	3.81			3.66			4.06
Efficiency ratio	49.53			40.81			40.20
Efficiency ratio, as adjusted (non-GAAP)(6)	44.55			42.12			40.36
Asset quality:
Non-performing assets to total assets	0.27			0.29			0.48
Non-performing loans to total loans	0.42			0.51			0.66
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans	475.99			471.61			331.10
Allowance for credit losses to total loans	2.01			2.41			2.19
Net charge-offs to average total loans	0.11			0.08			0.11

37

Summary Consolidated Financial Data – Continued

	As of the Years Ended December 31,
	2022			2021
	(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Balance sheet data (period end):
Total assets	$	22,883,588		$	18,052,138
Investment securities – available-for-sale	4,041,590			3,119,807
Loans receivable	14,409,480			9,836,089
Allowance for credit losses	289,669			236,714
Intangible assets	1,456,708			998,070
Non-interest-bearing deposits	5,164,997			4,127,878
Total deposits	17,938,783			14,260,570
Subordinated debentures	440,420			371,093
Stockholders' equity	3,526,362			2,765,721
Capital ratios:
Common equity to assets	15.41		%	15.32		%
Tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP)(1)(7)	9.66			10.36
Common equity Tier 1 capital	12.91			15.37
Tier 1 leverage ratio(8)	10.86			11.11
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	12.91			15.98
Total risk-based capital ratio	16.54			19.77
Dividend payout - common	42.07			28.88

__________________________

(1)Tangible calculations eliminate the effect of goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets and the corresponding amortization expense on a tax-effected basis.

(2)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Table 25,” for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation.

(3)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Table 26,” for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation.

(4)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Table 27,” for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation.

(5)Fully taxable equivalent (assuming an income tax rate of 26.135% for 2020, 25.740% for 2021 and 24.6735% for 2022).

(6)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Table 29,” for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation.

(7)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Table 28,” for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation.

(8)Leverage ratio is Tier 1 capital to quarterly average total assets less intangible assets and gross unrealized gains/losses on available-for-sale investment securities.

38

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis presents our consolidated financial condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. This discussion should be read together with the “Summary Consolidated Financial Data,” our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and other financial data included in this document. In addition to the historical information provided below, we have made certain estimates and forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ significantly from those anticipated in these estimates and in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those discussed in the section of this document captioned “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this document. Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “Company,” “HBI,” “us,” “we” and “our” refer to Home BancShares, Inc. on a consolidated basis.

General

We are a bank holding company headquartered in Conway, Arkansas, offering a broad array of financial services through our wholly owned bank subsidiary, Centennial Bank (“Centennial”). As of December 31, 2022, we had, on a consolidated basis, total assets of $22.88 billion, loans receivable, net, of $14.12 billion, total deposits of $17.94 billion, and stockholders’ equity of $3.53 billion.

We generate most of our revenue from interest on loans and investments, service charges, and mortgage banking income. Deposits and FHLB borrowed funds are our primary source of funding. Our largest expenses are interest on our funding sources, salaries and related employee benefits and occupancy and equipment. We measure our performance by calculating our net interest margin, return on average assets and return on average common equity. We also measure our performance by our efficiency ratio and efficiency ratio, as adjusted (non-GAAP). The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing non-interest expense less amortization of core deposit intangibles by the sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and non-interest income. The efficiency ratio, as adjusted, is a meaningful non-GAAP measure for management, as it excludes certain items and is calculated by dividing non-interest expense less amortization of core deposit intangibles by the sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and non-interest income excluding certain items such as merger expenses, hurricane expenses and/or gains and losses.

Table 1: Key Financial Measures

	As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Total assets	$	22,883,588		$	18,052,138		$	16,398,804
Loans receivable	14,409,480			9,836,089			11,220,721
Allowance for credit losses	(289,669)			(236,714)			(245,473)
Total deposits	17,938,783			14,260,570			12,725,790
Total stockholders’ equity	3,526,362			2,765,721			2,605,758
Net income	305,262			319,021			214,488
Basic earnings per share	$	1.57		$	1.94		$	1.30
Diluted earnings per share	1.57			1.94			1.30
Book value per share	17.33			16.90			15.78
Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)(1)	10.17			10.80			9.70
Net interest margin(2)	3.81		%	3.66		%	4.06		%
Efficiency ratio	49.53			40.81			40.20
Efficiency ratio, as adjusted (non-GAAP)(3)	44.55			42.12			40.36
Return on average assets	1.35			1.83			1.33
Return on average common equity	9.17			11.89			8.57

(1)See Table 25 for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation.

(2)Fully taxable equivalent (assuming an income tax rate of 26.135% for 2020, 25.740% for 2021 and 24.6735% for 2022).

(3)See Table 29 for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation.

39

2022 Overview

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021

Our net income decreased $13.8 million, or 4.3%, to $305.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $319.0 million for the same period in 2021. On a diluted earnings per share basis, our earnings were $1.57 per share for the year ended December 31, 2022 and $1.94 per share for the year ended December 31, 2021. As a result of the acquisition of Happy Bancshares, Inc. ("Happy"), which we completed on April 1, 2022, we incurred $49.6 million in merger expenses and recorded a $45.2 million provision for credit losses on acquired loans for the CECL "double count," an $11.4 million provision for credit losses on acquired unfunded commitments and a $2.0 million provision for credit losses on acquired held-to-maturity investment securities. The summation of these items reduced net income by $81.6 million ($108.2 million pre-tax) and earnings per share by $0.42 per share for the year ended December 31, 2022. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of Happy, the Company determined that an additional $5.0 million provision for credit losses on loans was necessary due to increased loan growth during the year. However, excluding the impact of the acquisition of Happy, the Company determined no additional provision for unfunded commitments or investment securities was necessary as of December 31, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded $10.0 million in income from the settlement of a lawsuit brought by the Company, net of legal expense, $6.7 million in recoveries on historic losses from loans charged off prior to acquisition, and $1.4 million in special dividends from equity investments, which were partially offset by $2.1 million in trust preferred securities ("TRUPS") redemption fees, $1.3 million loss for the decrease in fair value of marketable securities and $176,000 in hurricane expenses.

Total interest income increased by $252.6 million, or 40.4%, and non-interest income increased by $37.5 million, or 27.3%. This was partially offset by a $177.1 million, or 59.3%, increase in non-interest expense and a $66.9 million, or 128.1%, increase in interest expense. These fluctuations are primarily due to the acquisition of Happy during the second quarter of 2022 and the rising rate environment. The increase in interest income resulted from a $156.4 million, or 27.3%, increase in loan interest income, a $70.6 million, or 142.0%, increase in investment income and a $25.6 million, or 728.2%, increase in interest income on deposits at other banks. The increase in non-interest income was primarily due to a $27.6 million, or 133.2%, increase in other income, a $14.8 million, or 66.6%, increase in service charges on deposit accounts, a $10.9 million, or 555.9%, increase in trust fees, an $8.1 million, or 22.3%, increase in other service charges and fees and a $1.8 million, or 85.5%, increase in the cash value of life insurance. These increases were partially offset by an $8.5 million, or 117.7%, decrease in income for the fair value adjustment for marketable securities resulting from a $1.3 million decrease in the fair value of marketable securities for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a $7.2 million increase for the year ended December 31, 2021, an $8.0 million, or 31.2%, decrease in mortgage lending income, a $5.6 million, or 38.0%, decrease in dividends from FHLB, FRB, FNBB and other, a $2.2 million, or 92.3%, decrease in the gain on sale of SBA loans and a $1.5 million, or 75.0%, decrease in gain on OREO. Included within other income was $15.0 million in income from the settlement of a lawsuit brought by the Company and $6.7 million in recoveries on historic losses from loans charged off prior to acquisition, and included within dividends from FHLB, FRB, FNBB and other were $1.4 million in special dividends. The increase in non-interest expense was due to a $68.1 million, or 39.9%, increase in salaries and employee benefits, $49.6 million in merger and acquisition expenses, a $33.8 million, or 52.1%, increase in other operating expenses, a $16.8 million, or 45.8%, increase in occupancy and equipment and a $10.7 million, or 43.9%, increase in data processing expense. Included within other operating expense were $5.0 million in legal expenses from a lawsuit brought by the Company, $2.1 million in TRUPS redemption fees and $176,000 in hurricane expenses. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to a $61.1 million, or 244.8%, increase in interest on deposits, a $3.5 million, or 45.7%, increase in interest on FHLB and other borrowed funds and a $1.4 million, or 7.5%, increase in interest on subordinated debentures as a result of the acquisition of $140.0 million of subordinated debt and $23.2 million in trust preferred securities from Happy during the second quarter of 2022. Income tax expense decreased by $8.4 million, or 8.6%, during 2022 due to the decrease in net income and the reduction in the marginal tax rate related to the Happy acquisition.

40

Our net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased from 3.66% for the year ended December 31, 2021 to 3.81% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The yield on interest earning assets was 4.40% and 3.99% for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, as average interest earning assets increased from $15.86 billion to $20.15 billion. The increase in average earning assets is primarily the result of a $2.57 billion increase in average loans receivable and a $1.87 billion increase in average investment securities, largely resulting from the acquisition of Happy, which were partially offset by a $151.9 million decrease in average interest-bearing balances due from banks. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we recognized $16.3 million and $20.2 million, respectively, in total net accretion for acquired loans and deposits. The reduction in accretion was dilutive to the net interest margin by approximately 2 basis points. During 2022, the Company experienced a $31.8 million reduction in interest income from PPP loans due to the forgiveness of the PPP loans and the acceleration of the deferred fees for the loans that were forgiven. This reduction in income was dilutive to the net interest margin by approximately 8 basis points. We recognized $3.8 million in event interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to $6.7 million in event income for the year ended December 31, 2021. This was dilutive to the net interest margin by approximately 2 basis points. The overall increase in the net interest margin was due to an increase in interest income due to an increase in both average earning assets at higher yields, which was partially offset by an increase in interest expense due to an increase in average interest-bearing liabilities at higher interest rates primarily as a result of the Happy acquisition and the current rising interest rate environment.

Our efficiency ratio was 49.53% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 40.81% for the same period in 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2022, our efficiency ratio, as adjusted (non-GAAP), was 44.55%, compared to 42.12% reported for the year ended December 31, 2021. (See Table 29 for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation).

Our return on average assets was 1.35% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 1.83% for the same period in 2021, and our return on average assets, as adjusted (non-GAAP) was 1.67% or the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 1.73% for the same period in 2021. Our return on average common equity was 9.17% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 11.89% for the same period in 2021.

Financial Condition as of and for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021

Our total assets as of December 31, 2022 increased $4.83 billion to $22.88 billion from the $18.05 billion reported as of December 31, 2021. The increase in total assets is primarily due to the acquisition of $6.69 billion in total assets, net of purchase accounting adjustments, from Happy during the second quarter of 2022. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $2.93 billion, or 80.14%. Our loan portfolio balance increased $4.57 billion to $14.41 billion as of December 31, 2022, from $9.84 billion as of December 31, 2021. The increase in loans was due to the acquisition of $3.65 billion in loans, net of purchase accounting adjustments, from Happy in the second quarter of 2022 and $242.2 million in marine loans from LendingClub Bank during the first quarter of 2022, as well as $678.6 million in organic loan growth during 2022. Total deposits increased $3.68 billion to $17.94 billion as of December 31, 2022 compared to $14.26 billion as of December 31, 2021. The increase in deposits was primarily due to the acquisition of $5.86 billion in deposits, net of purchase accounting adjustments, from Happy in the second quarter of 2022, partially offset by $2.18 billion in deposit decline during the year. Stockholders’ equity increased $760.6 million to $3.53 billion as of December 31, 2022, compared to $2.77 billion as of December 31, 2021. The increase in stockholders’ equity is primarily associated with the $961.3 million in common stock issued to Happy shareholders for the acquisition of Happy on April 1, 2022 and $305.3 million in net income, which were partially offset by the $315.9 million decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income, $128.4 million of shareholder dividends paid and the repurchase of $70.9 million of our common stock during 2022. The improvement in stockholders’ equity was 27.5% for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to December 31, 2021.

As of December 31, 2022, our non-performing loans increased to $60.9 million, or 0.42%, of total loans from $50.2 million, or 0.51%, of total loans as of December 31, 2021. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-performing loans increased to 475.99% as of December 31, 2022, compared to 471.61% as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing loans from our Arkansas franchise were $8.4 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $13.9 million as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing loans from our Florida franchise were $20.5 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $26.8 million as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing loans from our new Texas franchise were $22.2 million at December 31, 2022. Non-performing loans from our Alabama franchise were $404,000 at December 31, 2022 compared to $470,000 as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing loans from our SPF franchise were $2.3 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $1.5 million as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing loans from our Centennial CFG franchise were $7.1 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $7.5 million as of December 31, 2021.

41

As of December 31, 2022, our non-performing assets increased to $61.5 million, or 0.27%, of total assets from $51.8 million, or 0.29%, of total assets as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing assets from our Arkansas franchise were $8.5 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $14.4 million as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing assets from our Florida franchise were $20.8 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $27.9 million as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing assets from our new Texas franchise were $22.4 million at December 31, 2022. Non-performing assets from our Alabama franchise were $404,000 at December 31, 2022 compared to $470,000 as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing assets from our SPF franchise were $2.3 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $1.5 million as of December 31, 2021. Non-performing assets from our CFG franchise were $7.1 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $7.5 million as of December 31, 2021.

The $7.1 million balance of non-accrual loans for our Centennial CFG market balance of non-accrual loans for our Centennial CFG market consists of two loans that are assessed for credit risk by the Federal Reserve under the Shared National Credit Program. Due to the condition of the two loans, partial charge-offs for a total of $5.4 million were taken on these loans during 2022. The loans are not current on either principal or interest, and we have reversed any interest that had accrued subsequent to the non-accrual date designated by the Federal Reserve. Any interest payments that are received will be applied to the principal balance.

2021 Overview

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

Our net income increased $104.6 million, or 48.8%, to $319.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, from $214.4 million for the same period in 2020. On a diluted earnings per share basis, our earnings were $1.94 per share for the year ended December 31, 2021 and $1.30 per share for the year ended December 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company did not record a provision for credit losses but did record a $4.8 million negative provision for unfunded commitments compared to a $112.3 million provision for credit losses and a $17.0 million provision for unfunded commitments for a total credit loss expense of $129.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The $4.8 million negative provision for the year ended December 31, 2021 was due to a single commercial & industrial loan for which a reserve was no longer considered necessary due to the borrower’s current cash flow position. The $129.3 million of total credit loss expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily due to the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic, with $9.3 million as a result of the acquisition of LH-Finance on February 29, 2020. The Company’s provisioning model is closely tied to unemployment rate projections which continued to improve following the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company determined that an additional provision for credit losses was not necessary. Despite the improvements in the economic and public health outlooks in the United States during 2021, the emergence of the Delta variant during the second quarter and the Omicron variant during the fourth quarter resulted in significant uncertainty about the future impact of the pandemic on our business, results of operations and financial condition. As a result, the Company determined that a negative provision for credit losses was not appropriate at the end of 2021, and the level of the allowance for credit losses was considered adequate as of December 31, 2021. The Company also recorded a $7.2 million adjustment for the increase in fair market value of marketable securities, $12.5 million of special dividend income from our equity investments, $5.1 million recovery on historic losses from loans charged-off prior to acquisition, $1.9 million of merger and acquisition expense and a $219,000 gain on sale of investment securities.

Total interest expense decreased by $41.2 million, or 44.1%, and non-interest income increased by $25.8 million, or 23.1%. This was partially offset by a $50.8 million, or 7.5%, decrease in total interest income and a $11.1 million, or 3.9%, increase in non-interest expense. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to a $38.2 million decrease in interest on deposits and a $1.9 million decrease in interest on FHLB borrowed funds. The increase in non-interest income was primarily due to a $9.2 million increase in the fair value adjustment on marketable securities, an $8.3 million increase in other income, a $5.8 million increase in other service charges and fees, a $2.4 million increase in dividends from FHLB, FRB, FNBB & other and a $1.7 million increase in gain on sale of SBA loans and was partially offset by a $3.4 million decrease in mortgage lending income. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to a $53.4 million decrease in loan interest income. The increase in non-interest expense was due to a $6.8 million increase in salaries and employee benefits, a $5.2 million increase in data processing expense and a $1.2 million increase in merger and acquisition expense and was partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in occupancy and equipment expense. Income tax expense increased by $34.5 million during 2021 due to an increase in net income.

42

Our net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis decreased from 4.06% for the year ended December 31, 2020 to 3.66% for the year ended December 31, 2021. The yield on interest earning assets was 3.99% and 4.70% for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, as average interest earning assets increased from $14.50 billion to $15.86 billion. The increase in average earning assets was primarily the result of a $1.84 billion increase in average interest-bearing balances due from banks and a $659.0 million increase in average investment securities, partially offset by the $1.13 billion decrease in average loans receivable. Average PPP loan balances were $434.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. These loans bore interest at 1.00% plus the accretion of the deferred origination fee. Including deferred fees, we recognized total interest income of $35.6 million on PPP loans for the year ended December 31, 2021. The PPP loans were accretive to the net interest margin by 13 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2021. This was primarily due to approximately $910.1 million of the Company’s PPP loans being forgiven during 2021 which included the acceleration of $24.8 million in deferred fees for the loans that were forgiven. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $3.6 million in remaining unamortized PPP fees. The COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting governmental response created a significant amount of excess liquidity in the market. As a result, we had an increase of $1.84 billion in average interest-bearing cash balances for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. This excess liquidity was dilutive to the net interest margin by 46 basis points. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recognized $20.2 million and $27.4 million, respectively, in total net accretion for acquired loans and deposits. The reduction in accretion was dilutive to the net interest margin by 4 basis points. We recognized $6.7 million in event interest income for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $2.1 million in event income for the year ended December 31, 2020. This increased the net interest margin by 3 basis points.

Our efficiency ratio was 40.81% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 40.20% for the same period in 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our efficiency ratio, as adjusted (non-GAAP), was 42.12%, compared to 40.36% reported for the year ended December 31, 2020. (See Table 29 for the non-GAAP tabular reconciliation).

Our return on average assets was 1.83% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 1.33% for the same period in 2020. Our return on average common equity was 11.89% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 8.57% for the same period in 2020.

Financial Condition as of and for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

Our total assets as of December 31, 2021 increased $1.65 billion to $18.05 billion from the $16.40 billion reported as of December 31, 2020. Cash and cash equivalents increased $2.39 billion, or 188.8%. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was due to loan paydowns as well as the significant amount of excess liquidity in the market as a continued result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the accompanying governmental response. Our loan portfolio balance decreased $1.38 billion to $9.84 billion as of December 31, 2021, from $11.22 billion as of December 31, 2020. The decrease in the loan portfolio was due to organic loan decline of $822.2 million and $910.1 million of the Company’s PPP loans being forgiven during 2021, which were partially offset by $347.7 million in new PPP loan originations during 2021. Total deposits increased $1.53 billion to $14.26 billion as of December 31, 2021 compared to $12.73 billion as of December 31, 2020, which was due to customers holding higher deposit balances in response to the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the resulting governmental response to the pandemic. Stockholders’ equity increased $160.0 million to $2.77 billion as of December 31, 2021, compared to $2.61 billion as of December 31, 2020. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily associated with the $319.0 million in net income, partially offset by the $33.7 million decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income, $92.1 million of shareholder dividends paid and the repurchase of $44.5 million of our common stock during 2021. The improvement in stockholders’ equity was 6.1% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020.

As of December 31, 2021, our non-performing loans decreased to $50.2 million, or 0.51%, of total loans from $74.1 million, or 0.66%, of total loans as of December 31, 2020. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-performing loans increased to 471.61% as of December 31, 2021, compared to 331.10% as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing loans from our Arkansas franchise were $13.9 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $24.1 million as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing loans from our Florida franchise were $26.8 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $43.1 million as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing loans from our Alabama franchise were $470,000 at December 31, 2021 compared to $530,000 as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing loans from our SPF franchise were $1.5 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $3.6 million as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing loans from our Centennial CFG franchise were $7.5 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $2.8 million as of December 31, 2020.

43

As of December 31, 2021, our non-performing assets decreased to $51.8 million, or 0.29%, of total assets from $78.6 million, or 0.48%, of total assets as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing assets from our Arkansas franchise were $14.4 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $25.6 million as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing assets from our Florida franchise were $27.9 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $46.0 million as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing assets from our Alabama franchise were $470,000 at December 31, 2021 compared to $564,000 as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing assets from our SPF franchise were $1.5 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $3.6 million as of December 31, 2020. Non-performing assets from our CFG franchise were $7.5 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $2.8 million as of December 31, 2020.

The $7.5 million balance of non-accrual loans for our Centennial CFG market consisted of two loans that are assessed for Credit risk by the Federal Reserve under the Shared National Credit Program. The decision to place these loans on non-accrual status was made by the Federal Reserve and not the Company. The loans that made up the total balance were still current on both principal and interest at December 31, 2021. However, all interest payments were currently being applied to the principal balance. Because the Federal Reserve required us to place these loans on non-accrual status, we have reversed any interest that had accrued subsequent to the non-accrual date designated by the Federal Reserve.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Overview. We prepare our consolidated financial statements based on the selection of certain accounting policies, generally accepted accounting principles and customary practices in the banking industry. These policies, in certain areas, require us to make significant estimates and assumptions. Our accounting policies are described in detail in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included as part of this document.

We consider a policy critical if (i) the accounting estimate requires assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the accounting estimate; and (ii) different estimates that could reasonably have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on our financial statements. Using these criteria, we believe that the accounting policies most critical to us are those associated with our lending practices, including the accounting for the allowance for credit losses, foreclosed assets, investments, intangible assets, income taxes and stock options.

Revenue Recognition. Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC Topic 606"), establishes principles for reporting information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from the entity's contracts to provide goods or services to customers. The core principle requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services recognized as performance obligations are satisfied. The majority of our revenue-generating transactions are not subject to ASC Topic 606, including revenue generated from financial instruments, such as our loans, letters of credit, investment securities and mortgage lending income, as these activities are subject to other GAAP discussed elsewhere within our disclosures. Descriptions of our revenue-generating activities that are within the scope of ASC Topic 606, which are presented in our income statements as components of non-interest income are as follows:

•Service charges on deposit accounts – These represent general service fees for monthly account maintenance and activity or transaction-based fees and consist of transaction-based revenue, time-based revenue (service period), item-based revenue or some other individual attribute-based revenue. Revenue is recognized when our performance obligation is completed, which is generally monthly for account maintenance services or when a transaction has been completed (such as a wire transfer). Payment for such performance obligations are generally received at the time the performance obligations are satisfied.

•Other service charges and fees – These represent credit card interchange fees and Centennial CFG loan fees. The interchange fees are recorded in the period the performance obligation is satisfied which is generally the cash basis based on agreed upon contracts. Centennial CFG loan fees are based on loan or other negotiated agreements with customers and are accounted for under ASC Topic 310. Interchange fees were $22.1 million and $16.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Centennial CFG loan fees were $11.8 million and $11.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

•Trust fees - The Company enters into contracts with its customers to manage assets for investment, and/or transact on their accounts. The Company generally satisfies its performance obligations as services are rendered. The management fees are percentage based, flat, percentage of income or a fixed percentage calculated upon the average balance of assets depending upon account type. Fees are collected on a monthly or annual basis.

44

Credit Losses. We account for credit losses in accordance with ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("CECL"). The measurement of expected credit losses under the CECL methodology is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loan receivables and held-to-maturity debt securities. It also applies to off-balance sheet credit exposures not accounted for as insurance (loan commitments, standby letters of credits, financial guarantees, and other similar instruments) and net investments in leases recognized by a lessor in accordance with Topic 842 on leases.

Investments – Available-for-sale. Securities available-for-sale ("AFS") are reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes. Securities that are held as available-for-sale are used as a part of our asset/liability management strategy. Securities that may be sold in response to interest rate changes, changes in prepayment risk, the need to increase regulatory capital, and other similar factors are classified as available-for-sale. The Company evaluates all securities quarterly to determine if any securities in a loss position require a provision for credit losses in accordance with ASC 326. The Company first assesses whether it intends to sell or is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For securities that do not meet this criteria, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, the Company considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, and changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income. The Company has made the election to exclude accrued interest receivable on AFS securities from the estimate of credit losses and report accrued interest separately on the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as provision for (or reversal of) credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.

Investments – Held-to-Maturity. Debt securities held-to-maturity ("HTM"), which include any security for which we have the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity, are reported at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted to the call date to interest income using the constant effective yield method over the estimated life of the security. The Company evaluates all securities quarterly to determine if any securities in a loss position require a provision for credit losses in accordance with ASC 326, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The Company measures expected credit losses on HTM securities on a collective basis by major security type, with each type sharing similar risk characteristics. The estimate of expected credit losses considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company has made the election to exclude accrued interest receivable on HTM securities from the estimate of credit losses and report accrued interest separately on the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as provision for (or reversal of) credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a security is confirmed.

Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses. Except for loans acquired during our acquisitions, substantially all of our loans receivable are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, as it is management’s intent to hold them for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, except for mortgage loans held for sale. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loans based on the principal balance outstanding.

The allowance for credit losses on loans receivable is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans are charged off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed and expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off.

Management estimates the allowance balance using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term as well as for changes in environmental conditions, such as changes in the national unemployment rate, gross domestic product, rental vacancy rate, housing price indices and rental vacancy rate index.

45

The allowance for credit losses is measured based on call report segment as these types of loans exhibit similar risk characteristics. The identified loan segments are as follows:

•1-4 family construction

•All other construction

•1-4 family revolving home equity lines of credit (“HELOC”) & junior liens

•1-4 family senior liens

•Multifamily

•Owner occupies commercial real estate

•Non-owner occupied commercial real estate

•Commercial & industrial, agricultural, non-depository financial institutions, purchase/carry securities, other

•Consumer auto

•Other consumer

•Other consumer - SPF

The allowance for credit losses for each segment is measured through the use of the discounted cash flow method. Loans evaluated individually that are considered to be impaired are not included in the collective evaluation. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. For loans for which a specific reserve is not recorded, an allowance is recorded based on the loss rate for the respective pool within the collective evaluation if a specific reserve is not recorded.

Expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals, and modifications unless either of the following applies:

•Management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that troubled debt restructuring will be executed with an individual borrower.

•The extension or renewal options are included in the original or modified contract at the reporting date and are not unconditionally cancellable by the Company.

Management qualitatively adjusts model results for risk factors that are not considered within our modeling processes but are nonetheless relevant in assessing the expected credit losses within our loan pools. These qualitative factors ("Q-Factors") and other qualitative adjustments may increase or decrease management's estimate of expected credit losses by a calculated percentage or amount based upon the estimated level of risk. The various risks that may be considered in making Q-Factor and other qualitative adjustments include, among other things, the impact of (i) changes in lending policies, procedures and strategies; (ii) changes in nature and volume of the portfolio; (iii) staff experience; (iv) changes in volume and trends in classified loans, delinquencies and nonaccruals; (v) concentration risk; (vi) trends in underlying collateral values; (vii) external factors such as competition, legal and regulatory environment; (viii) changes in the quality of the loan review system and (ix) economic conditions.

Loans considered impaired, according to ASC 326, are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The aggregate amount of impairment of loans is utilized in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and amount of provisions thereto. Losses on impaired loans are charged against the allowance for credit losses when in the process of collection, it appears likely that such losses will be realized. The accrual of interest on impaired loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion the collection of interest is doubtful or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due. When accrual of interest is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Loans are placed on non-accrual status when management believes that the borrower’s financial condition, after giving consideration to economic and business conditions and collection efforts, is such that collection of interest is doubtful, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due. Loans are charged against the allowance for credit losses when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely. Accrued interest related to non-accrual loans is generally charged against the allowance for credit losses when accrued in prior years and reversed from interest income if accrued in the current year. Interest income on non-accrual loans may be recognized to the extent cash payments are received, although the majority of payments received are usually applied to principal. Non-accrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when principal and interest payments are less than 90 days past due, the customer has made required payments for at least six months, and we reasonably expect to collect all principal and interest.

46

Acquisition Accounting and Acquired Loans. We account for our acquisitions under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, and liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value. In accordance with ASC 326, the Company records both a discount and an allowance for credit losses on acquired loans. All purchased loans are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows.

The Company has purchased loans, some of which have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination. Purchase credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans are recorded at the amount paid. An allowance for credit losses is determined using the same methodology as other loans. The initial allowance for credit losses determined on a collective basis is allocated to individual loans. The sum of the loan’s purchase price and allowance for credit losses becomes its initial amortized cost basis. The difference between the initial amortized cost basis and the par value of the loan is a noncredit discount or premium, which is amortized into interest income over the life of the loan. Subsequent changes to the allowance for credit losses are recorded through the provision for credit loss.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures: The Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Company is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures is adjusted as a provision for credit loss expense. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life.

Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale. Real estate and personal properties acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are to be sold and are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Valuations are periodically performed by management, and the real estate and personal properties are carried at fair value less costs to sell. Gains and losses from the sale of other real estate and personal properties are recorded in non-interest income, and expenses used to maintain the properties are included in non-interest expenses.

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business acquisitions. The core deposit intangible represents the excess intangible value of acquired deposit customer relationships as determined by valuation specialists. The core deposit intangibles are being amortized over 48 months to 121 months on a straight-line basis. Goodwill is not amortized but rather is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. We perform an annual impairment test of goodwill and core deposit intangibles as required by FASB ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, in the fourth quarter or more often if events and circumstances indicate there may be an impairment.

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (ASC 740, Income Taxes). The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. We determine deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur.

Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term “more likely than not” means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms “examined” and “upon examination” also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date and is subject to the management’s judgment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Both we and our subsidiary file consolidated tax returns. Our subsidiary provides for income taxes on a separate return basis, and remits to us amounts determined to be currently payable.

Stock Compensation. In accordance with FASB ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, and FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, the fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant. We recognize compensation expense for the grant-date fair value of the option award over the vesting period of the award.

47

Acquisitions

Acquisition of Happy Bancshares, Inc.

On April 1, 2022, the Company completed the acquisition of Happy Bancshares, Inc. (“Happy”), and merged Happy State Bank into Centennial Bank. The Company issued approximately 42.4 million shares of its common stock valued at approximately $958.8 million as of April 1, 2022. In addition, the holders of certain Happy stock-based awards received approximately $3.7 million in cash in cancellation of such awards, for a total transaction value of approximately $962.5 million. The acquisition added new markets for expansion and brought complementary businesses together to drive synergies and growth.

Including the effects of the known purchase accounting adjustments, as of the acquisition date, Happy had approximately $6.69 billion in total assets, $3.65 billion in loans and $5.86 billion in customer deposits. Happy formerly operated its banking business from 62 locations in Texas.

For further discussion of the acquisition, see Note 2 "Business Combinations" to the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Acquisition of Marine Portfolio

On February 4, 2022, the Company completed the purchase of the performing marine loan portfolio of Utah-based LendingClub Bank (“LendingClub”). Under the terms of the purchase agreement with LendingClub, the Company acquired yacht loans totaling approximately $242.2 million. This portfolio of loans is housed within the Company's Shore Premier Finance division, which is responsible for servicing the acquired loan portfolio and originating new loan production.

LH-Finance

On February 29, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of LH-Finance, the marine lending division of People’s United Bank, N.A. The Company paid a purchase price of approximately $421.2 million in cash. LH-Finance provided direct consumer financing for USCG registered high-end sail and power boats. Additionally, LH-Finance provided inventory floor plan lines of credit to marine dealers, primarily those selling USCG documented vessels.

Including the purchase accounting adjustments, as of the acquisition date, LH-Finance had approximately $409.1 million in total assets, including $407.4 million in total loans, which resulted in goodwill of $14.6 million being recorded.

The acquired portfolio of loans is now housed in our SPF division. The SPF division is responsible for servicing the acquired loan portfolio and originating new loan production. In connection with this acquisition, we opened a new loan production office in Baltimore, Maryland.

See Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the acquisition of LH-Finance.

We will continue evaluating all types of potential bank acquisitions, which may include FDIC-assisted acquisitions as opportunities arise, to determine what is in the best interest of our Company. Our goal in making these decisions is to maximize the return to our investors.

Branches

As opportunities arise, we will continue to open new (commonly referred to as de novo) branches in our current markets and in other attractive market areas. We opened one de novo branch location in 2022 in Ft. Worth, Texas.

As of December 31, 2022, we