Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2019

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Text Block]

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance

Effective January 1, 2019

Inclusion of the Overnight Indexed Swap Rate Based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes. On October 25, 2018, the FASB issued amended guidance to permit use of the overnight-index swap (OIS) rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. This guidance became effective for us on January 1, 2019. Upon adoption, SOFR became an eligible benchmark interest rate which we may elect to apply to future hedge relationships.

Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. This guidance requires that, for fair-value hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness be presented in the same income statement line that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item. For cash-flow hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness must be recorded in other comprehensive income. In addition, the amendments include certain targeted improvements to the assessment of hedge effectiveness and permit, among other things, the following:

• Measurement of the change in fair value of the hedged item on the basis of the benchmark rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows determined at hedge inception;

• Measurement of the hedged item in a partial-term fair-value hedge of interest-rate risk by assuming the hedged item has a term that reflects only the designated cash flows being hedged;

• Consideration of how changes in the benchmark interest rate alone affect a decision to settle a prepayable instrument before its scheduled maturity in calculating the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to interest-rate risk;

• For a cash-flow hedge of interest-rate risk of a variable-rate financial instrument, an entity could designate as the hedged risk the variability in cash flows attributable to the contractually specified interest rate;

• For a closed portfolio of prepayable financial assets or one or more beneficial interests secured by a portfolio of prepayable financial instruments, an entity can designate an amount that is not expected to be affected by prepayments, defaults, and other events affecting the timing and amount of cash flows (the “last-of-layer” method) into a hedging relationship; and

• An entity can perform subsequent assessments of hedge effectiveness qualitatively in instances where initial quantitative testing is required.

We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2019. For all cash-flow hedges existing on the date of adoption, this guidance was applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance were applied prospectively; prior period comparative financial information has not been reclassified to conform to current presentation. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 12 — Derivatives and Hedging Activities for additional information.

Leases. On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued guidance that requires recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the statement of condition and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. In particular, this guidance requires a lessee of operating or finance leases to recognize on the statement of condition a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. However, for leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Under previous GAAP, a lessee was not required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases on the statement of condition. The guidance became effective for us on January 1, 2019. Upon adoption of the new guidance, we recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for our operating leases of approximately $11.9 million and $12.5 million, respectively, on the statement of condition. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information.

Effective January 1, 2020

Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. On March 12, 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board released temporary optional guidance that provides transition relief for reference rate reform. The guidance contains optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or a reference rate that is expected to be discontinued as a result of reference rate reform if certain criteria are met.

In addition to the optional expedients for contract modifications and hedging relationships, this update provides a one-time election to sell, transfer, or both sell and transfer debt securities classified as held-to-maturity that reference a rate affected by reference rate reform and that are classified as held-to-maturity before January 1, 2020.

This standard is effective upon issuance and the provisions generally can be applied prospectively as of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. We are in the process of evaluating this guidance, and its anticipated effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows has not yet been determined.

Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance for the accounting of credit losses on financial instruments. The amendments require entities to measure expected credit losses based on relevant information about past events (including historical experience), current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity must use judgment in determining the relevant information and estimation methods that are appropriate in its circumstances. The new guidance requires a financial asset, or a group of financial assets, measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected over the contractual term of the financial asset(s). The guidance also requires, among other things, that we:

• Reflect in the statement of operations the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period.

• Determine the allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination that are measured at amortized cost in a similar manner to other financial assets measured at amortized cost. The initial allowance for credit losses is required to be added to the purchase price.

• Record credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities through an allowance for credit losses. The amendments limit the allowance for credit losses to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost.

• Further disaggregate the current disclosure of credit quality indicators in relation to the amortized cost of financing receivables by the year of origination.

This guidance is effective for us for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. This guidance is required to be applied using a modified-retrospective approach, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. In addition, entities are required to use a prospective transition approach for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination and for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date.

The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.