XML 23 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Investments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]  
Investments Investments
The Bank has short-term investments and may make other investments in debt securities, which are classified as trading, AFS, or HTM as further described below.

Interest-Bearing Deposits, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell, and Federal Funds Sold

The Bank makes short-term investments in interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and Federal funds sold to provide short-term liquidity. These investments are generally transacted with counterparties that have received a credit rating of BBB or greater (investment grade) by an NRSRO.

Interest-bearing deposits and Federal funds sold are unsecured investments. Federal funds sold are generally transacted on an overnight term. Finance Agency regulations include a limit on the amount of unsecured credit the Bank may extend to a counterparty. At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, all investments in interest-bearing deposits and Federal funds sold were repaid according to the contractual terms; no ACL was recorded for these assets at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Carrying values of interest-bearing deposits and Federal funds exclude accrued interest receivable which was immaterial for all periods presented. At September 30, 2020, none of these investments were with counterparties rated below BBB or with unrated counterparties. These may differ from any internal ratings of the investments by the Bank, if applicable.

Securities purchased under agreements to resell are secured investments. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are generally transacted on an overnight term and have standard market practices that include collateral maintenance provisions. As such, they are evaluated regularly to determine that the securities purchased under agreements to resell are fully collateralized. The counterparty is required to deliver additional collateral if the securities purchased under agreements to resell become under-collateralized, generally by the next business day. At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, all investments in securities purchased under agreements to resell were repaid according to the contractual terms; no ACL was recorded for these assets at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Carrying value of securities purchased under agreements to resell exclude accrued interest receivable which was immaterial for all periods presented. At September 30, 2020, none of these investments were with counterparties rated below BBB or with unrated counterparties. These may differ from any internal ratings of the investments by the Bank, if applicable.

Debt Securities

The Bank invests in debt securities, which are classified as trading, AFS, or HTM. Within these investments, the Bank is primarily subject to credit risk related to private label MBS that are supported by underlying mortgage or asset-backed loans. In 2007, the Bank discontinued the purchase of private label MBS. The Bank is prohibited by Finance Agency regulations from purchasing certain higher-risk securities, such as equity securities and debt instruments that are not investment quality, other than certain investments targeted at low-income persons or communities.

    Trading Securities. The following table presents trading securities as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
(in thousands)September 30, 2020December 31, 2019
U.S. Treasury obligations$1,028,642 $3,390,772 
GSE and TVA obligations258,906 240,878 
Total$1,287,548 $3,631,650 
The following table presents net gains (losses) on trading securities for the third quarter and first nine months of 2020 and 2019.
 Three months ended September 30,Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)2020201920202019
Net unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities held at period-end
$(3,447)$5,429 $28,640 $22,840 
Net unrealized and realized gains (losses) on trading securities sold/matured during the period
(1,876)12 25,228 515 
Net gains (losses) on trading securities$(5,323)$5,441 $53,868 $23,355 

AFS Securities. The following tables present AFS securities as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
 September 30, 2020
(in thousands)
Amortized Cost (1)
Allowance for Credit Losses (2)
Gross Unrealized GainsGross Unrealized LossesFair Value
Non-MBS:     
GSE and TVA obligations
$1,607,356 $— $51,315 $— $1,658,671 
State or local agency obligations234,097 — 13,793 — 247,890 
Total non-MBS$1,841,453 $— $65,108 $— $1,906,561 
MBS:     
U.S. obligations single-family MBS$651,330 $— $7,490 $(133)$658,687 
GSE single-family MBS 3,675,908 — 28,991 (362)3,704,537 
GSE multifamily MBS 3,608,683 — 11,649 (4,719)3,615,613 
Private label MBS232,906 (1,691)36,749 (340)267,624 
Total MBS$8,168,827 $(1,691)$84,879 $(5,554)$8,246,461 
Total AFS securities$10,010,280 $(1,691)$149,987 $(5,554)$10,153,022 
 December 31, 2019
(in thousands)
Amortized Cost (1)
OTTI Recognized in AOCIGross Unrealized GainsGross Unrealized LossesFair Value
Non-MBS:     
GSE and TVA obligations
$1,508,264 $— $42,435 $— $1,550,699 
State or local agency obligations238,496 — 9,398 — 247,894 
Total non-MBS$1,746,760 $— $51,833 $— $1,798,593 
MBS:     
U.S. obligations single-family MBS$805,294 $— $3,590 $(1,298)$807,586 
GSE single-family MBS 4,053,700 — 9,574 (7,415)4,055,859 
GSE multifamily MBS 4,120,532 — 4,581 (15,528)4,109,585 
Private label MBS274,624 — 51,704 (182)326,146 
Total MBS$9,254,150 $— $69,449 $(24,423)$9,299,176 
Total AFS securities$11,000,910 $— $121,282 $(24,423)$11,097,769 
Notes:
(1) Includes adjustments made to the cost basis of an investment for accretion, amortization, OTTI and/or fair value hedge accounting adjustments, and excludes accrued interest receivable of $19.3 million and $24.4 million at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
(2) Due to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, effective January 1, 2020, the Bank recorded an ACL for expected credit losses on AFS securities.
The following tables summarize the AFS securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
 September 30, 2020
 Less than 12 MonthsGreater than 12 MonthsTotal
(in thousands)Fair ValueUnrealized LossesFair ValueUnrealized LossesFair ValueUnrealized Losses
MBS:      
U.S. obligations single-family MBS$— $— $56,485 $(133)$56,485 $(133)
GSE single-family MBS 49,120 (86)228,764 (276)277,884 (362)
GSE multifamily MBS 214,578 (269)2,487,327 (4,450)2,701,905 (4,719)
Private label MBS1,799 (22)2,611 (318)4,410 (340)
Total MBS$265,497 $(377)$2,775,187 $(5,177)$3,040,684 $(5,554)
Total$265,497 $(377)$2,775,187 $(5,177)$3,040,684 $(5,554)
 December 31, 2019
 Less than 12 MonthsGreater than 12 MonthsTotal
(in thousands)Fair ValueUnrealized LossesFair ValueUnrealized LossesFair ValueUnrealized Losses
MBS:
U.S. obligations single-family MBS$492,038 $(1,022)$46,104 $(276)$538,142 $(1,298)
GSE single-family MBS 2,458,728 (6,318)221,806 (1,097)2,680,534 (7,415)
GSE multifamily MBS 2,515,001 (10,683)1,181,509 (4,845)3,696,510 (15,528)
Private label MBS— — 2,979 (182)2,979 (182)
Total MBS$5,465,767 $(18,023)$1,452,398 $(6,400)$6,918,165 $(24,423)
Total$5,465,767 $(18,023)$1,452,398 $(6,400)$6,918,165 $(24,423)

Redemption Terms. The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are presented below. Expected maturities of some securities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.
(in thousands)September 30, 2020December 31, 2019
Year of MaturityAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair Value
Non-MBS:
Due in one year or less$65,371 $65,586 $— $— 
Due after one year through five years545,669 557,360 525,301 534,642 
Due after five years through ten years795,744 823,978 700,613 719,672 
Due after ten years434,669 459,637 520,846 544,279 
Total non-MBS1,841,453 1,906,561 1,746,760 1,798,593 
MBS8,168,827 8,246,461 9,254,150 9,299,176 
Total AFS securities$10,010,280 $10,153,022 $11,000,910 $11,097,769 
Interest Rate Payment Terms.  The following table details interest payment terms at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
(in thousands)September 30, 2020December 31, 2019
Amortized cost of AFS non-MBS:  
 Fixed-rate
$1,841,453 $1,746,760 
 Variable-rate
— — 
Total non-MBS$1,841,453 $1,746,760 
Amortized cost of AFS MBS:  
Fixed-rate$1,619,573 $1,444,111 
Variable-rate6,549,254 7,810,039 
Total MBS$8,168,827 $9,254,150 
Total amortized cost of AFS securities$10,010,280 $11,000,910 

    HTM Securities. The following tables present HTM securities as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
 September 30, 2020
(in thousands)
Amortized Cost (1)
Gross Unrealized Holding GainsGross Unrealized Holding LossesFair Value
MBS:   
U.S. obligations single-family MBS$176,039 $1,384 $— $177,423 
GSE single-family MBS1,158,572 26,140 (709)1,184,003 
GSE multifamily MBS531,098 55,058 — 586,156 
Private label MBS101,327 301 (1,856)99,772 
Total MBS$1,967,036 $82,883 $(2,565)$2,047,354 
Total HTM securities (2)
$1,967,036 $82,883 $(2,565)$2,047,354 
 December 31, 2019
(in thousands)
Amortized Cost (1)
Gross Unrealized Holding GainsGross Unrealized Holding LossesFair Value
Non-MBS:    
State or local agency obligations$94,310 $— $(3,394)$90,916 
MBS:   
U.S. obligations single-family MBS$250,195 $1,087 $(78)$251,204 
GSE single-family MBS1,156,545 20,896 (254)1,177,187 
GSE multifamily MBS770,823 26,231 (252)796,802 
Private label MBS123,818 881 (520)124,179 
Total MBS$2,301,381 $49,095 $(1,104)$2,349,372 
Total HTM securities $2,395,691 $49,095 $(4,498)$2,440,288 
Notes:
(1) Includes adjustments made to the cost basis of an investment for accretion and amortization and excludes accrued interest receivable of $4.5 million and $6.2 million at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
(2) Due to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, effective January 1, 2020, the Bank was required to record an ACL on HTM securities. However, no credit loss was determined for these securities as of September 30, 2020.

Redemption Terms. The amortized cost and fair value of HTM securities by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are presented below. Expected maturities of some securities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.
(in thousands)September 30, 2020December 31, 2019
Year of MaturityAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair Value
Non-MBS:    
Due in one year or less$— $— $— $— 
Due after one year through five years— — — — 
Due after five years through ten years— — 31,925 31,381 
Due after ten years— — 62,385 59,535 
Total non-MBS— — 94,310 90,916 
MBS1,967,036 2,047,354 2,301,381 2,349,372 
Total HTM securities$1,967,036 $2,047,354 $2,395,691 $2,440,288 

Interest Rate Payment Terms. The following table details interest rate payment terms at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
(in thousands)September 30, 2020December 31, 2019
Amortized cost of HTM non-MBS:  
Fixed-rate$— $— 
Variable-rate— 94,310 
Total non-MBS$— $94,310 
Amortized cost of HTM MBS:  
Fixed-rate
$1,659,123 $1,878,151 
Variable-rate
307,913 423,230 
Total MBS$1,967,036 $2,301,381 
Total HTM securities$1,967,036 $2,395,691 

    Debt Securities ACL. An ACL on AFS and HTM securities was required to be assessed upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, effective January 1, 2020. For HTM securities, there is no ACL at September 30, 2020. For AFS securities, the Bank recorded an ACL only on its private label MBS at September 30, 2020.

AFS Debt Securities - Rollforward of ACL. The following table presents a rollforward of the ACL on AFS securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.
(in thousands)Private label MBS
September 30, 2020
Three months ended Nine months ended
Balance, beginning of period$1,574 $— 
Additional increases (decreases) for securities in which a previous allowance or credit loss was recorded
117 1,691 
Balance, end of period$1,691 $1,691 

Debt Securities ACL Methodology. To evaluate investment securities for credit losses at September 30, 2020, the Bank employs the following methodologies by major security type.

GSE and Other U.S. Obligations. The Bank invests in GSE and other U.S. obligations, which includes Tennessee Valley Authority obligations, single-family MBS, and GSE single-family and multifamily MBS. These securities are issued by Federal Agencies or U.S. government corporations and include MBS issued by these same entities that are directly supported by underlying mortgage loans. All of these securities carry an implicit or explicit government guarantee such that the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero. As a result, no ACL was recorded on GSE and other U.S. obligations at September 30, 2020.
The Bank only purchases GSE and other U.S. obligations considered investment quality. At September 30, 2020, all of these GSE and other U.S. obligations, based on amortized cost, were rated BBB or above by a NRSRO, based on the lowest long-term credit rating for each security. These may differ from any internal ratings of the securities by the Bank, if applicable.

State or Local Agency Obligations. The Bank invests in state or local agency obligations, such as municipal securities. These securities are subject to credit risk related to a portfolio of state and local agency obligations (i.e., Housing Finance Agency bonds) that are directly or indirectly supported by underlying mortgage loans and carry an implicit or explicit guarantee of the state or local agency. The Bank has not experienced any payment defaults on these instruments.

    The Bank only purchases state or local agency obligations considered investment quality. At September 30, 2020, all of these state or local agency obligations, based on amortized cost, were rated BBB or above by a NRSRO, based on the lowest long-term credit rating for each security. These may differ from any internal ratings of the securities by the Bank, if applicable.

The Bank evaluates AFS state or local agency obligations for an ACL based on a credit assessment of the issuer, or guarantor. If the Bank determines that an ACL should be recognized, it is limited to the unrealized loss of the state or local agency obligation, including zero if it is in an unrealized gain position. At September 30, 2020, the Bank expects to receive all cash flows contractually due, and no ACL was recorded on AFS state or local agency obligations.

    Private Label MBS. The Bank also holds investments in private label MBS. The Bank has not purchased any private label MBS since 2007. However, many of these securities have subsequently experienced significant credit deterioration. As of September 30, 2020, 20.6% of private label MBS (AFS and HTM combined, based on amortized cost) were rated BBB or above by a NRSRO and the remaining securities were either rated less than BBB or were unrated. To determine whether an ACL is necessary on these securities, the Bank uses cash flow analyses.

The Bank's evaluation includes estimating the projected cash flows that the Bank is likely to collect based on an assessment of available information, including the structure of the applicable security and certain assumptions such as:

•the remaining payment terms for the security;
•prepayment speeds based on underlying loan-level borrower and loan characteristics;
•expected default rates based on underlying borrower and loan characteristics;
•expected loss severity based on underlying borrower and loan characteristics;
•expected housing price changes; and
•expected interest-rate assumptions.
The Bank performed a cash flow analysis using a third-party model to assess whether the entire amortized cost basis of its private label MBS securities will be recovered. The projected cash flows are based on a number of assumptions and expectations, and the results of the model can vary significantly with changes in assumptions and expectations. The projected cash flows, determined based on the model approach, reflect a best estimate scenario and include a base case housing price forecast.