XML 24 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies  
Commitments and Contingencies

7. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating Leases

 

The Company leases office and laboratory space in Monrovia, CA through June 2020 with an option to renew for an additional five years.

 

The Company also leases office space in San Diego, CA through June 2020.

 

The leases are accounted for as non-cancellable operating leases and future minimum payments are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ending December 31,

 

 

For the remainder of the fiscal year

 

$

607

2018

 

 

833

2019

 

 

859

2020

 

 

466

Thereafter

 

 

 —

 

Rent expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $189,000 and $143,000 respectively.

 

In April 2017, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent (“LOI”) to lease additional office space in San Diego, CA. Under the terms of the LOI, the Company would lease approximately 23,700 square feet of office space for a five-year period beginning from the date of occupancy. The total payments over the term of the lease would be $5.7 million. The Company expects to complete the lease negotiations and take occupancy of the space in the second quarter of 2017.

 

Contingencies

 

From time to time, the Company may be subject to various litigation and related matters arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe it is currently subject to any material matters where there is at least a reasonable possibility that a material loss may be incurred.

 

On March 3, 2015, a verified class action complaint, captioned DePinto v. John S. Stafford, et al., C.A. No. 10742, was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against certain of the Company’s current and former directors alleging cause of action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Invalidity of Director and Stockholder Consents.  In general, the complaint alleged that the plaintiff and the class he seeks to represent were shareholders of the Company during the recapitalization and certain related transactions that the Company underwent in 2013 and that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties in the course of approving that series of transactions. It also challenged as invalid certain corporate acts taken in the 2013 time period.

 

The plaintiffs and the Company agreed to separate the litigation into two separate claims; Count I relating to the claim of Breach of Fiduciary Duty by the current and former directors of the Company and, Count II relating to the Invalidity of Director and Stockholder consents. 

 

On December 14, 2015, the Delaware Chancery Court entered an Order and Partial Final Judgment in connection with Count II and approved the settlement of the invalidity claims, validating each corporate act challenged in the complaint, dismissing with prejudice Count II of the complaint (the invalidity claims) and granting plaintiff’s counsel a fee award of $950,000. We have paid the plaintiff’s legal award of $950,000 net of insurance proceeds of $187,500 which has been reflected as a charge in our 2015 operations.

 

On September 27, 2016, the parties engaged in voluntary mediation and agreed to settle the complaint’s remaining claim, Count II, for a total payment of $2.375 million to the class certified by the Delaware Court of Chancery. The settlement, which is subject to approval by the Court, was reached without any party admitting wrong-doing. Under the terms of the settlement, no payments shall be made to the plaintiffs by the Company or any of the defendants in the lawsuit other than payments covered by the Company’s insurance.

 

On April 4, 2017, the Delaware Court of Chancery approved the Settlement between the parties. On May 1, 2017, the Company’s insurance carriers fully funded the settlement account.

 

We continue to recognize legal costs related to the litigation as incurred and offset any insurance proceeds when approved and issued. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 we have reported the $2.355 million settlement as a payable and also reflected a receivable of the same amount for the insurance coverage that will fund the settlement.

 

We are obligated to make future payments to third parties under in‑license agreements, including sublicense fees, royalties, and payments that become due and payable on the achievement of certain development and commercialization milestones. As the amount and timing of sublicense fees and the achievement and timing of these milestones are not probable and estimable, such commitments have not been included on our balance sheet.