XML 21 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 4 - Commitments and Contingencies
 
SIGA Litigation
 
In December 2006, we filed a complaint against SIGA in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The complaint alleged, among other things, that we have the right to license exclusively the development and marketing rights for SIGA’s drug candidate, Tecovirimat, also known as ST-246®, pursuant to a merger agreement between the parties that was terminated in 2006. The complaint also alleged that SIGA failed to negotiate in good faith the terms of such a license pursuant to the terminated merger agreement with us.
 
In September 2014, SIGA filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”). SIGA’s petition for bankruptcy initiated a process whereby its assets were protected from creditors, including PharmAthene.
 
In January 2015, after years of litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a Final Order and Judgment, finding that we are entitled to receive a lump sum award of $194.6 million, or the Total Judgment, comprised of (1) expectation damages of $113.1 million for the value of the Company’s lost profits for Tecovirimat, plus (2) pre-judgment interest on that amount from 2006 and varying percentages of the Company’s reasonable attorneys’ and expert witness fees, totaling $81.5 million. Under the Final Order and Judgment, PharmAthene is also entitled to post-judgment simple interest.
 
On December 23, 2015, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Delaware Court of Chancery's decision as a result of which, with additional post-judgment interest, if calculated based on the original decision, would provide for an estimated total award of approximately $205 million.
 
As discussed in Note 1 – Business and Liquidity, on April 8, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming SIGA’s Plan effective April 12, 2016 which provides for among other things, the process by which SIGA may emerge from bankruptcy, which includes the process by which our Judgment may be satisfied. The Plan provides generally that we will receive, in full settlement and satisfaction of our claim, no later than 120 days plus another potential 90 days after March 23, 2016 (generally considered to be no later than October 19, 2016), one of the following, determined in SIGA’s sole discretion:
 
i.
payment in full in cash of the unpaid balance of our claim plus interest;
 
ii.
delivery to us of 100% of SIGA’s common stock; or
 
iii.
such other treatment as may be mutually agreed upon in writing by SIGA and PharmAthene and approved by the Bankruptcy Court.
 
On July 20, 2016, The Company and SIGA filed a Joint Motion which seeks approval of amendments to the Plan that would extend the deadline for SIGA to satisfy the previously disclosed judgment owed to the Company from October 19, 2016 to November 30, 2016, conditioned on SIGA’s payment to PharmAthene of $100 million on or prior to October 19, 2016 that will be applied against PharmAthene’s judgment. Interest on any unpaid balance will continue to accrue at 8.75% per year and be paid monthly to the Company by SIGA. A hearing to consider the Joint Motion is scheduled to be held before the Bankruptcy Court on August 15, 2016. No assurance can be given that the Joint Motion will be approved by the Bankruptcy Court.
 
If the Joint Motion is not approved, under the original terms of the Plan, if  SIGA does not make its choice or satisfy the judgment in the manner in which it has chosen by October 19, 2016, we will receive 100% of SIGA by October 24, 2016.
 
From and after the Effective date (April 12, 2016), SIGA will compute interest on the outstanding balance of the judgment and pay us in arrears monthly. The interest was computed at a rate of 8.75% from April 12, 2016 through June 30, 2016.
 
Under the Plan, we received $8.9 million from SIGA in the second quarter of 2016, comprised of an initial payment of $5 million (which amount is creditable against final satisfaction of the judgment in our favor and is not refundable) and $3.9 million of interest payments, which has been recorded in other income – litigation on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. We received $20 million from SIGA in July 2016, as payment to extend by 90 days, until October 19, 2016, the date by which SIGA must satisfy the judgment (this amount is also creditable against final satisfaction of the judgment in our favor and is not refundable).
 
The description of the Plan provided above is a brief summary of the Plan, which includes numerous other conditions and substantive provisions relating to the operation of the business of SIGA. Copies of the Plan are available from the Bankruptcy Court. For a description of risks related to our ability to recognize value relating to this litigation, see the “Risk Factors” section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2016.
 
There can be no assurances if and when the Company will receive any additional payments from SIGA as a result of the Judgment. SIGA has indicated in filings with the Bankruptcy Court that it does not currently have cash sufficient to satisfy the award. It is also uncertain whether SIGA will have such cash in the future. Our ability to collect the Judgment depends upon a number of factors, including SIGA’s financial and operational success, which is subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties (certain of which are outlined in SIGA’s filings with the SEC), as to which we have limited knowledge and which we have no ability to control, mitigate or fully evaluate. Other than the cash payments received to date, the Company has not recognized any potential proceeds from these actions in the financial statements.
 
Government Contracting
 
Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee contracts are provisional. The accuracy and appropriateness of costs charged to U.S. Government contracts are subject to regulation, audit and possible disallowance by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) and other government agencies such as the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ("BARDA"). Accordingly, costs billed or billable to U.S. Government customers are subject to potential adjustment upon audit by such agencies. We have finalized incurred cost audits with DCAA for 2006 through 2011. BARDA audited indirect costs or rates charged by us on the SparVax® contract for the years 2008 through 2014. As a result of the BARDA audits, we recorded additional revenue of $5.8 million in 2015, and additional revenue  of $0.8 million in the second quarter of 2016.
 
Changes in government policies, priorities or funding levels through agency or program budget reductions by the U.S. Congress or executive agencies could materially adversely affect the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, contracts with the U.S. Government may be terminated or suspended by the U.S. Government at any time, with or without cause. Such contract suspensions or terminations could result in unreimbursable expenses or charges or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and/or results of operations.
 
Registration Rights Agreements
 
We entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the investors who participated in the July 2009 private placement of convertible notes and related warrants. We subsequently filed two registration statements on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the resale of the shares issuable upon conversion of the convertible notes and exercise of the related warrants, which have been declared effective. We are obligated to maintain the registration statements effective until the date when such shares (and any other securities issued or issuable with respect to or in exchange for such shares) have been sold or are eligible for resale without restrictions under Rule 144. The convertible notes were converted or extinguished in 2010. The warrants expired on January 28, 2015.
 
We have separate registration rights agreements with investors, under which we have obligations to keep the corresponding registration statements effective until the registrable securities (as defined in each agreement) have been sold, and under which we may have separate obligations to file registration statements in the future on either a demand or “piggy-back” basis or both.
 
Under the terms of the convertible notes, which were converted or extinguished in 2010, if after the 2nd consecutive business day (other than during an allowable blackout period) on which sales of all of the securities required to be included on the registration statement cannot be made pursuant to the registration statement (a “Maintenance Failure”), we will be required to pay to each selling stockholder a one-time payment of 1.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes relating to the affected shares on the initial day of a Maintenance Failure. Our total maximum obligation under this provision at June 30, 2016, which is not probable of payment, would be approximately $0.2 million.
 
Following a Maintenance Failure, we will also be required to make to each selling stockholder monthly payments of 1.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes relating to the affected shares on every 30th day after the initial day of a Maintenance Failure, in each case prorated for shorter periods and until the failure is cured. Our total maximum obligation under this provision, which is not probable of payment, would be approximately $0.2 million for each month until the failure, if it occurs, is cured.
 
Leases
 
We lease our office in Maryland under a 10 year operating lease, which commenced on May 1, 2007. Remaining annual minimum payments are as follows:
 
Year
 
Lease Payments(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016
 
$
428,294
 
2017
 
 
356,911
 
 
 
$
785,205
 
 
(1)
Minimum payments have not been reduced by the minimum sublease rentals of $0.1 million due in the future under noncancellable subleases.
 
On September 2, 2015, the Company entered into a sublease agreement with a third party with respect to a portion of its leased office space at an amount less than the Company’s leased amount.
 
The present value of the Company’s remaining net lease liability for the subleased office space (net of the sublease rental income) at June 30, 2016 was $0.2 million, and is reflected on the balance sheet as accrued restructuring expenses - current.
 
License Agreements
 
On July 6, 2015, we signed a license agreement with ImmunoVaccine Technologies (“IMV”) for the exclusive use of the DepoVaxTM vaccine platform (“DPX”), to develop an anthrax vaccine utilizing PharmAthene’s rPA. On June 23, 2016, we terminated this license agreement.