XML 37 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.1
Commitments and Contingencies
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies [Text Block] Commitments and Contingencies

Joint and Several Liability. The FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all consolidated obligations issued. Accordingly, if an FHLBank were unable to repay any consolidated obligation for which it is the primary obligor, each of the other FHLBanks could be called upon by the Finance Agency to repay all or part of such obligations. No FHLBank has ever been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the total par value of outstanding consolidated obligations issued on behalf of other FHLBanks for which the Bank is jointly and severally liable was $904.9 billion and $894.5 billion.

The following table summarizes additional off-balance sheet commitments for the Bank (dollars in millions):
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Expire
within one year
 
Expire
after one year
 
Total
 
Total
Standby letters of credit1
$
10,025

 
$
168

 
$
10,193

 
$
9,094

Standby bond purchase agreements
62

 
757

 
819

 
675

Commitments to purchase mortgage loans
127

 
—

 
127

 
101

Commitments to issue bonds
—

 
—

 
—

 
60

Commitments to fund advances
527

 
—

 
527

 
50



1
Excludes commitments to issue standby letters of credit of $34 million and $3 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Standby Letters of Credit. The Bank issues standby letters of credit on behalf of its members to support certain obligations of the members to third-party beneficiaries. Standby letters of credit may be offered to assist members in facilitating residential housing finance, community lending, and asset-liability management, and to provide liquidity. In particular, members often use standby letters of credit as collateral for deposits from federal and state government agencies. Standby letters of credit are executed with members for a fee. If the Bank is required to make payment for a beneficiary’s draw, the member either reimburses the Bank for the amount drawn or, subject to the Bank’s discretion, the amount drawn may be converted into a collateralized advance to the member. The original terms of standby letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2019, range from less than one month to 13 years, currently no later than 2025. The carrying value of guarantees related to standby letters of credit are recorded in “Other liabilities” on the Statements of Condition and amounted to $2 million at both December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The Bank monitors the creditworthiness of its standby letters of credit based on an evaluation of its borrowers. The Bank has established parameters for the measurement, review, classification, and monitoring of credit risk related to these standby letters of credit. All standby letters of credit, similar to advances, are fully collateralized at the time of issuance and subject to member borrowing limits as established by the Bank. Based on management’s credit analyses and collateral requirements, the Bank has deemed it unnecessary to record any additional liability for credit losses on these commitments.

Standby Bond Purchase Agreements. The Bank has entered into standby bond purchase agreements with state housing associates within its district whereby, for a fee, it agrees to serve as a standby liquidity provider if required, to purchase and hold the housing associate’s bonds until the designated marketing agent can find a suitable investor or the housing associate repurchases the bonds according to a schedule established by the agreement. Each standby bond purchase agreement includes the provisions under which the Bank would be required to purchase the bonds. At December 31, 2019, the Bank had standby bond purchase agreements with seven housing associates. The standby bond purchase commitments entered into by the Bank have original expiration periods of up to seven years, currently no later than 2025. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Bank was not required to purchase any bonds under these agreements.

Commitments to Purchase Mortgage Loans. The Bank enters into commitments that unconditionally obligate it to purchase mortgage loans from its members. These commitments are considered derivatives and their estimated fair value at December 31, 2019 and 2018 is reported in “Note 11 — Derivatives and Hedging Activities” as mortgage loan purchase commitments.

Commitments to Issue Bonds. The Bank enters into commitments to issue consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes outstanding in the normal course of its business. At December 31, 2019, the Bank had no commitments to issue consolidated obligation bonds. At December 31, 2018, the Bank had commitments to issue $60 million of consolidated obligation bonds.

Commitments to Fund Advances. The Bank enters into commitments to fund additional advances up to 24 months in the future. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Bank had commitments to fund advances of $527 million and $50 million.

Other Commitments. For each MPF master commitment, the Bank’s potential loss exposure prior to the PFI’s credit enhancement obligation is estimated and tracked in a memorandum account called the FLA. For absorbing certain losses in excess of the FLA, PFIs are paid a credit enhancement fee, a portion of which may be performance-based. To the extent the Bank experiences losses under the FLA, it may be able to recapture performance-based credit enhancement fees paid to the PFI to offset these losses. The FLA balance for all MPF master commitments with a PFI credit enhancement obligation was $138 million and $115 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Legal Proceedings. As a result of the Merger with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (Seattle Bank), the Bank has been involved in a number of legal proceedings initiated by the Seattle Bank against various entities relating to its purchases and subsequent impairment of certain private-label MBS. Of the 11 cases initially filed, one has been dismissed, two have been settled in part and dismissed in part, and eight have been settled. The Bank appealed the one complete dismissal and two partial dismissals covering the claims related to five certificates across three different cases. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal of the claims related to four certificates in December 2017 and affirmed the dismissal of the remaining certificate in May 2018. In January 2018, the Bank filed petitions for discretionary review of the appellate court’s rulings in December related to four of the certificates with the Washington Supreme Court. On May 3, 2018, the Court granted those petitions. The aggregate consideration paid for these four certificates is $567 million. Oral arguments were heard on October 9, 2018. In June 2018, the Bank filed a petition for discretionary review of the appellate court’s ruling in May 2018 on the fifth certificate. The aggregate consideration paid for that one certificate is $200 million.
On October 3, 2019, the Washington Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the appellate court on the four certificates
covered by the Bank’s petition of January 2018 and reinstated the Bank’s claims on those four certificates. Trials for the two cases relating to these reinstated claims have been scheduled for July and August of 2020. With respect to the fifth certificate, on January 30, 2020, the Washington Supreme Court remanded the case to the appellate court for reconsideration in light of the Court’s reversal on the claims for the other four certificates. Other than the private-label MBS litigation, the Bank does not believe any legal proceedings to which it is a party could have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
The Bank records legal expenses related to litigation settlements as incurred in other expense on the Statements of Income with the exception of certain legal expenses related to litigation settlement awards that are contingent based fees for the attorneys representing the Bank. The Bank incurs and recognizes these contingent based legal fees only when litigation settlement awards are realized, at which time these fees are netted against the gains recognized on the litigation settlement.  During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Bank did not recognize net gains on litigation settlements. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Bank recognized $21 million in net gains on litigation settlements.