UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 Commission file number 000-51468
	OR
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from ________ to ________

MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

Delaware	02-0620757
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3041 W Pasadena Dr
Boise, ID	83705
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

	(208) 955-8930
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value	The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer   x	Accelerated Filer  o	Non-Accelerated Filer  o	Smaller Reporting Company  o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting  company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

As of March 31, 2012 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1,050,000,000.  Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of our outstanding common stock have been excluded since such persons may be deemed affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of November 16, 2012 was 12,794,312.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Listed hereunder are the documents, any portions of which are incorporated by reference and the Parts of this Form 10-K into which such portions are incorporated:

1. The registrant’s definitive proxy statement for use in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about February 5, 2013 to be filed within 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, portions of which are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.  

MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item
PART I
	Cautionary Statement
1.	Business
1A.	Risk Factors
1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments
2.	Properties
3.	Legal Proceedings
4.	Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
6.	Selected Financial Data
7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
9A.	Controls and Procedures
9B.	Other Information
PART III
10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Registrant
11.	Executive Compensation
12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
13.	Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence
14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
SIGNATURES

PART I

Cautionary Statement for Purposes of “Safe Harbor Provisions” of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “project,” “intend” and similar expressions. These statements include, among others, statements regarding our expected business outlook, anticipated financial and operating results, our business strategy and means to implement our strategy, our objectives, the amount and timing of capital expenditures, the likelihood of our success in expanding our business, financing plans, budgets, working capital needs and sources of liquidity.

Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of performance. These statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions, which in turn are based on currently available information. Important assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements include, among others, assumptions regarding demand for our products, the expansion of product offerings geographically or through new applications, the timing and cost of planned capital expenditures, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. These assumptions could prove inaccurate. Forward-looking statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

·   the impact of vendor consolidation on our business;

·   changes in or availability of vendor contracts or rebate programs;

·   exclusivity requirements with certain vendors that may prohibit us from distributing competing products manufactured by other vendors or margin reductions if we become a non-exclusive distributor;

·   transitional challenges associated with acquisitions, including the failure to achieve anticipated synergies;

·   vendor rebates based upon attaining certain growth goals;

·   changes in the way vendors introduce/deliver products to market;

·   a disruption caused by adverse weather (i.e. drought) or other natural conditions or disasters;

·   possible changes in the use of feed additives (antibiotics, growth promotants) used in the production animal markets due to trade restrictions, consumer concern and/or government regulations;

·   seasonality;

·   unforeseen litigation;

·   risks associated with our international operations;

·   financial risks associated with acquisitions and investments;

·   the impact of general economic trends on our business;

·   the recall of a significant product by one of our vendors;

·   extended shortage or backorder of a significant product by one of our vendors;

·   the timing and effectiveness of marketing programs or price changes offered by our vendors;

·   the timing of the introduction of new products and services by our vendors;

·   our intellectual property rights may be inadequate to protect our business;

·   the ability to borrow on our revolving credit facility, extend the terms of our revolving credit facility or obtain alternative financing on favorable terms or at all;

1

·   risks from potential increases in variable interest rates;

·   the impact of tightening credit standards and/or access to credit on behalf of our customers and suppliers;

·   inability to ship products to the customer as a result of technological or shipping disruptions; and

·   competition.

Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are under no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of any new information, future events or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results or performance.

Investors should also be aware that while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts, it is against our policy to disclose any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, stockholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of the statement or report. Furthermore, we have a policy against issuing or confirming financial forecasts or projections issued by others. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not the responsibility of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.

Item 1. Business.

General

Our business commenced operations as part of a veterinary practice in 1976 and was incorporated as MWI Drug Supply, Inc., an Idaho corporation, in 1980. MWI Drug Supply, Inc. was acquired by Agri Beef Co. in 1981. MWI Veterinary Supply Co. was incorporated as an independent subsidiary of Agri Beef Co. in September 1994. Effective June 18, 2002, MWI Holdings, Inc. was formed by Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co. II, L.P. (“BRS”) for the sole purpose of acquiring all of the outstanding stock of MWI Veterinary Supply Co. from Agri Beef Co. (“Agri Beef”). As a result of this transaction, MWI Veterinary Supply Co. (“MWI Co.”) became a wholly-owned subsidiary of MWI Holdings, Inc. On April 21, 2005, we changed our name from MWI Holdings, Inc. to MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.  References in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” and “MWI” refer to MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. unless otherwise indicated.  Unless otherwise indicated, all statistical information provided about our business in this report is as of September 30, 2012.

We are a leading distributor of animal health products to veterinarians across the United States and United Kingdom. Our growth has primarily been from internal growth initiatives and, to a lesser extent, selective acquisitions.  In fiscal year 2010, we acquired the outstanding share capital of Centaur Services Limited (“Centaur”).  Based in Castle Cary, England, Centaur is a supplier of animal health products to veterinarians in the United Kingdom.  On March 21, 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Nelson Laboratories Limited Partnership (“Nelson”).  Nelson was a distributor of animal health products to over 1,100 veterinary practices, primarily in the Midwestern United States.  On October 31, 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd. (“Micro”).  Micro is a value-added distributor to the production animal market, including the distribution of micro feed ingredients, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, parasiticides, supplies, and other animal health products.  Micro also is a leading innovator of proprietary, computerized management systems for the production animal market.

Products we sell include pharmaceuticals, vaccines, parasiticides, diagnostics, micro feed ingredients, supplies, specialty products, veterinary pet food, capital equipment and nutritional products. We market these products to veterinarians in both the companion animal and production animal markets. As of September 30, 2012, we had a sales force of 484 people covering the United States and a sales force of 22 people in the United Kingdom. We also offer our customers a variety of value-added services, including our e-commerce platform, technology management systems, pharmacy fulfillment, inventory management system, equipment procurement consultation, special order fulfillment, educational seminars and pet cremation, which we believe closely integrates us with our customers’ day-to-day operations and provides them with meaningful incentives to continue ordering from us.

2

We estimate that approximately 57% of our total revenues in the United States have been generated from sales to the companion animal market and 43% from sales to the production animal market.  Including the gross billings from agency commissions which are excluded from our total revenues in order to comply with generally accepted accounting principles, we estimate that in the United States approximately 63% of our total revenues have been generated from sales to the companion animal market and 37% from sales to the production animal market.  In the United Kingdom, we estimate that approximately two-thirds of our total revenues have been generated from sales to the companion animal market and one-third from sales to the production animal market.

Geographic Information

Revenues and long-lived assets by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):

			2012		2011		2010
Revenues for the fiscal years ended September 30
	United States		$	1,776,414	$	1,304,794	$	1,074,226
	International (United Kingdom)			298,732		260,546		155,116
		Total	$	2,075,146	$	1,565,340	$	1,229,342
Long-lived assets as of September 30
	United States		$	29,001	$	18,953	$	9,762
	International (United Kingdom)			6,783		6,256		5,476
		Total	$	35,784	$	25,209	$	15,238

Industry Overview

According to Sundale Research (“Sundale”), animal health product sales in the United States for calendar year 2011 were approximately $7.6 billion based on prices at the manufacturers’ level. The market for animal health products in the United States is a mix of products sold for companion and production animals. Companion animals include dogs, cats, horses and other pets, while production animals include cattle and other food-producing animals. Sundale estimates that companion animal products accounted for 56% of the total market for animal health products in the United States in calendar year 2011.  According to the GfK Vetrak UK market survey in October 2012 that compiles revenue statistics, animal health product sales in the United Kingdom for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 was approximately £770 million.

Historically, the growth in the companion animal market has been due to the increasing number of households with companion animals, an aging pet population, increased expenditures on animal health and preventative care, advancements in animal health products and extensive marketing programs sponsored by companion animal nutrition and pharmaceutical companies. Product sales in the production animal market are impacted by volatility in commodity prices such as milk, corn, grain and feeder cattle, changes in weather patterns (e.g. droughts or seasons of higher precipitation that determine how long cattle will graze and consequently the number of days an animal is on feed during a finishing phase) or a change in the general economy, which can shift the number of animals treated, the timing of when animals are treated, to what extent they are treated and which products they are treated with.  We support production animal veterinarians with a broad range of products and value-added services. Historically, sales in this market have been largely driven by spending on animal health products to improve productivity, weight gain and disease prevention, as well as a growing focus on food safety.  We believe that these growth factors have been mitigated by the downward influence of generic drugs on pricing.

Veterinarians are one of the primary purchasers of animal health products, particularly in the companion animal market. As of December 31, 2011, according to the American Veterinary Medical Association, or AVMA, there were more than 63,000 veterinarians in private practice nationwide. According to the statistics from the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, there are approximately 13,000 veterinarians in private practice in the United Kingdom, with a total of approximately 4,400 veterinary outlets.  We believe that distributors play a vital role for veterinary practices by providing access to a broad selection of products through a single channel and helping them efficiently manage their inventory levels. Distributors also offer vendors substantial value by providing cost-effective access to a highly fragmented and geographically diverse customer base.

3

Competitive Strengths

We believe that our strengths include:

· Leading Distributor to Veterinarians. While most of our products are available from several sources and our customers typically have relationships with several distributors, we have achieved this position primarily through internal growth. We believe that our broad product offering, competitive pricing, superior customer service, rapid product fulfillment and value-added services provide meaningful incentives for our customers to continue ordering from us.  Our value-added services include our e-commerce platform, technology and information systems and pharmacy fulfillment programs.  Our pharmacies provide an efficient way for our customers to order prescription products in a cost effective, efficient manner while ensuring that they adhere to the strict regulations for these products.

· Leading Sales and Marketing Franchise. Our sales representatives in the United States educate customers on new veterinary products, assist in product selection and purchasing, and offer inventory management solutions. We also publish detailed product catalogs and monthly magazines, which are often utilized by our customers as reference tools. While salespeople and printed materials are vital to our marketing strategy, we also provide on-line ordering, valuable business information and value-added services through our Internet sites, www.mwivet.comand www.centaurweb.co.uk.

· Strong, Established Relationships with Veterinarians and Vendors. Our ability to serve as a single source for most of our customers’ animal health product needs has enabled us to develop strong and long-term customer relationships. For more than sixteen years we have maintained distribution arrangements with Banfield, The Pet Hospital (“Banfield”), the nation’s largest private veterinary practice, and with our non-controlled affiliate, Feeders’ Advantage, L.L.C. (“Feeders’ Advantage”), a related party and a buying group composed of several of the largest cattle feeders in the United States. Since we currently do not manufacture the vast majority of the products we sell, we are dependent on our vendors for the supply of our products. While our vendors often have relationships with multiple distributors, we have long-term relationships with many of our key vendors including Boehringer Ingelheim, Elanco, IDEXX Laboratories, Merck, Merial, Pfizer and Vedco.

· Recurring Revenue Product Base. Over 97% of our product sales were from consumable medicines and supplies commonly required by veterinarians in their practice. Historically, this aspect of our business has resulted in a recurring stream of revenues.

· Sophisticated Technology and Information Systems. We continue to invest in our technology and information systems, which we believe has created a competitive advantage when delivering quality service to our customers.  Our e-commerce platform offers enhanced online ordering capabilities for veterinarians.  This platform provides many features for our customers with enhanced security.  Our advanced computerized technology management systems offer our production animal customers the ability to more efficiently and effectively manage their animals and their operations.  This includes comprehensive information collection and management decision making in the areas of health, nutrition, information and animal management. These precision management tools help implement traceability and food safety regimens while optimizing performance and the use of the consumable products we distribute.

· Experienced Management Team. We have a strong and experienced senior management team with substantial animal health industry expertise. The members of our senior management team have been with us for an average of over seventeen years, and each member has demonstrated a commitment and capability to deliver growth in revenues and profitability.

Business Strategy

Our mission is to be the best resource to the veterinary profession by delivering superior value, efficiency and innovation. Our strategy to achieve our mission is outlined below.

4

Increase Sales to Existing Customers. We believe that veterinary practices typically purchase animal health products from multiple distributors in the United States. For our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, our average annual product sales per veterinary practice served in the United States was approximately $48,000.  We intend to increase our share of these purchases by utilizing our proprietary customer database to focus our marketing efforts, expanding our sales force, selectively adding products to our portfolio and increasing and expanding the value-added services we provide to our customers. By increasing the dollar value of purchases made by each customer as well as their average order size, we intend to increase our profitability. Competition for hiring sales representatives who have existing customer relationships is intense and we focus on retaining valued members of our staff who have demonstrated the skills needed to successfully market our products and services. If we fail to hire or retain a sufficient number of qualified sales professionals, it could adversely impact our business.  Veterinary practices typically purchase the majority of their animal health products from one wholesaler in the United Kingdom.

Expand Business Assistance Services for Veterinarians. We intend to enhance our customer relationships by expanding our business assistance services for veterinarians. These value-added services include among others our e-commerce platform, technology management systems, pharmacy fulfillment, inventory management system, equipment procurement consultation, special order fulfillment, educational seminars and pet cremation.

Increase the Total Number of Customers. We intend to add new customers by increasing the number and productivity of our sales representatives, selectively acquiring other animal health distributors and expanding distribution centers. We believe the greatest opportunities to add new customers are in the Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the United States and abroad, areas where we do not hold the leading market position.

Continuously Seek to Improve Operations. We continuously evaluate opportunities to increase sales, lower costs and realize operating efficiencies. Current initiatives include investments in our technology and distribution center infrastructure. We also plan to pursue alternative product sourcing strategies and have a private label program on selected products to reduce our procurement costs and increase our profitability, while maintaining strong relationships with key vendors.

Make Selective Acquisitions. The United States market for animal health products distribution is highly fragmented, with numerous national, regional and local distributors. Many of these companies are small, privately-held businesses, some of which may represent attractive acquisition candidates.  We also believe there are acquisition opportunities outside of the United States and we intend to seek out those companies that would be a strategic fit for us.

Products

During fiscal year 2012 in the United States, we sold more than 38,000 products, of which over 17,000 are stocked in our distribution centers, sourced from nearly 700 vendors. During fiscal year 2012 in the United Kingdom, we sold approximately 22,000 products, of which nearly 12,000 are stocked in our distribution center, sourced from approximately 500 vendors.  For our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, our product revenues in the United States were comprised of approximately 38% pharmaceutical products, 15% vaccine products, 12% parasiticide products, 8% micro feed ingredients, 6% diagnostic products, 2% capital equipment products and 19% of other supplies. In addition, we sell approximately 800 products in the United States under agency agreements with our vendors. Under an agency agreement, we typically solicit orders and provide customer service for a commission, while the vendor stocks and ships the products.  Including gross billings from agency contracts for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, our product revenues in the United States were comprised of approximately 34% pharmaceutical products, 14% vaccine products, 20% parasiticide products, 7% micro feed ingredients, 5% diagnostic products, 2% capital equipment products and 16% of other supplies. We also have available on special order approximately 18,000 products in the United States that we do not normally stock in our warehouses. We continually seek to update and improve the range of products we offer to address our customer requirements.  For our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, our product revenues in the United Kingdom were comprised of approximately 75% pharmaceuticals (which include vaccines and parasiticides), 15% pet foods and 10% of other consumable supplies.

Pharmaceuticals, Vaccines, Parasiticides and Micro Feed Ingredients

We offer our customers a variety of pharmaceuticals, vaccines, parasiticides and micro feed ingredients. Our pharmaceutical products typically include anesthetics, analgesics, antibiotics, ophthalmics and hormones. Our vaccine products are primarily comprised of small animal, equine and production animal biologicals. Our parasiticides are used for control of fleas, ticks, flies, mosquitoes and internal parasites.  Micro feed ingredients are feed grade products such as pharmaceuticals, vitamins, minerals and other nutritional products that are used to optimize the health and performance of production animals.

5

Diagnostics, Capital Equipment and Supplies

We offer a wide range of diagnostics, capital equipment and supplies to veterinarians. Diagnostic sales typically include consumable in-clinic tests for detecting heartworm, lyme, feline leukemia and parvovirus, as well as consumable products for measuring blood chemistry, electrolyte balance and cell counts. Our capital equipment sales include anesthesia machines, surgical monitors, diagnostic equipment, dental machines, cages, lights and x-ray machines. We employ a team of capital equipment specialists to analyze the latest technologies and recommend equipment that meets our customers’ specific needs. Our sales of supplies include syringes, instruments, bandages, IV products, surgical consumables, grooming materials and other small equipment items used by veterinary practices.

Veterinary Pet Food and Nutritional Products

We offer our customers a broad selection of veterinary pet foods and nutritional products. We consider veterinary pet food to consist of two categories: foods for specialty diets and premium pet foods. Specialty diets are recommended by veterinarians to address specific medical and nutritional needs. Premium pet foods are recommended by veterinarians to promote optimal nutrition in healthy animals. Pet foods are typically sold under agency agreements. Nutritional products include dietary supplements, vitamins, dental chews and specialty treats which either help address specific medical conditions or are compatible with recommended nutritional guidelines.

Value-Added Services

We offer our customers a variety of value-added services, which we believe closely integrate us with our customers’ day-to-day operations and provide them with meaningful incentives to continue ordering from us. These services include the following:

Service	Description
E-commerce platform	On-line ordering system that provides information to veterinary practices on products, vendor programs and purchasing history
Pharmacy fulfillment	Shipment of prescription production and companion animal health products to end-users in the United States on behalf of veterinarians from our seven licensed pharmacies located in Amarillo, Texas; Edwardsville, Kansas; Grand Prairie, Texas; Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Whitestown, Indiana; Nampa, Idaho; and Sioux Falls, South Dakota and a licensed veterinary food-animal drug retailer in Visalia, California
Inventory management system	Flexible system that facilitates counting, maintaining and ordering inventory in veterinary practices
Technology management systems	Comprehensive feed, health, information and production management systems including micro ingredient machines, health management systems and age and source verification.
Equipment procurement consultation	Consultation and demonstrations provided by our dedicated capital equipment specialists in the United States
Special order fulfillment	Procurement and shipment of approximately 18,000 unique products in the United States that we do not normally stock in our warehouses
Educational seminars	Seminars for our customers covering business and medical topics, frequently sponsored in conjunction with our vendors
Pet cremation	Business unit presently operating with facility in Idaho that serves veterinary practices and their clients by providing cremation services

6

Customers

As of September 30, 2012, we served a vast majority of the veterinary practices and producers located throughout the United States and approximately one-third of the veterinary practices in the United Kingdom. These veterinary practices are typically small, privately-held businesses that we believe place at least one order per week to avoid storing and managing large volumes of supplies. We believe that these veterinary practices usually purchase animal health products from multiple distributors. We seek to be the principal provider of animal health products to our customer base.

We maintain a diverse and stable customer base. Independent veterinary practices have historically accounted for approximately 85% of our product sales. Also, for more than sixteen years, we have maintained distribution arrangements with Banfield, the nation’s largest private veterinary practice with over 800 veterinary hospitals, and our non-controlled affiliate, Feeders’ Advantage, a buying group composed of several of the largest cattle feeders in the United States. We typically do not enter into long-term contracts with our independent veterinary customers.

We are a party to three written agreements with Banfield, a First Amendment to the Agreement for Product Purchases, a First Amendment to the Agreement for Logistics Services and an Agreement for Home Delivery Logistics Services.   These contracts are effective from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2012, and can be terminated by either party with or without cause upon 150 days prior written notice. These contracts provide that we will be the supplier of logistics to Banfield, and these agreements govern the pricing, shipping and other terms and conditions under which we sell our products and provide logistics to Banfield. Under the Agreement for Product Purchases, as amended, we provide a limited warranty with respect to all goods sold by us and paid for by Banfield that good title to the products is conveyed, that the products are delivered free of any security interest, that the products will conform to the description, grade and condition of the products invoiced and that all products will be free of any defects arising while the products are either in our possession or control or in the control of any carrier transporting the goods from us to Banfield.  The term of our existing contracts with Banfield expired on June 30, 2012, however we are continuing to operate under the terms of those contracts.  We are in current negotiations with Banfield regarding new agreements and currently expect to have those new agreements executed by the end of calendar year 2012.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing strategies are designed to establish and maintain strong customer relationships through personal visits by field sales representatives, frequent telesales contact and direct marketing, emphasizing our broad product lines, competitive pricing, efficient ordering capabilities, high levels of customer support and service and other value-added services. The key elements of our sales and marketing strategy are:

· Field Sales Representatives: Our sales force in the United States is a key component of our value-added approach.  Due to the fragmented nature of the animal health products market, we believe that a large sales force is vital to effectively support existing customers and target potential customers. As of September 30, 2012, we had 316 field sales personnel throughout the United States. Our field sales representatives educate customers on new veterinary products, assist in product selection and purchasing and offer inventory management solutions. Once a field sales representative has established a relationship with a customer, the field sales representative encourages the customer to use our telesales representatives and online ordering capabilities for day-to-day customer needs. Field sales representatives work under the supervision of regional sales managers within an assigned sales territory to ensure effective communication and timely sales calls with customers. Our field sales representatives complement our telesales and direct marketing efforts and enable us to better market, service and support the sale of our products and services. Our field sales representatives are employees of our Company and are compensated with a combination of salaries and commissions.  The sales staff for Centaur does not actively promote products to the veterinarians, but rather sells products and maximizes the logistics services that Centaur provides.

· Telesales: We support our field sales representatives and direct marketing efforts with telesales representatives in nine call centers covering the United States. As of September 30, 2012, we had 168 telesales representatives in the United States. Telesales representatives work as partners with our field sales representatives, providing a dual coverage approach for individual customers. Telesales representatives process orders and generate new sales through frequent and direct contact with customers. Telesales representatives are responsible for assisting customers with ordering, purchasing decisions and general questions. Telesales representatives utilize our customized order entry system to process customer orders, access pricing, availability and promotional information about products, and research customer preferences and order history. Our nine call centers are connected by our telecommunications system which enables them to operate as one virtual call center.

7

· Direct Marketing: We market to existing and potential customers by distributing product catalogs and monthly magazines. We publish a small animal catalog, livestock catalog and an equine catalog. These catalogs include detailed descriptions and specifications of our products and are often used as a reference tool by our customers and sales force. We also promote our products and services in our monthly magazine, the Messenger, which our field sales representatives use as a tool to educate customers on product and vendor programs. Additional marketing tools that we utilize include specialty catalogs, customer loyalty programs, specific product and vendor programs, flyers, faxes, emails and other promotional materials. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, we distributed nearly 800,000 pieces of direct marketing materials to existing and potential customers.  We also participate in international, national and regional trade shows to extend our customer reach and enhance customer interaction.

· E-Commerce Platform: We provide on-line ordering, valuable business information and value-added services to veterinarians via our primary Internet site in the United States, www.mwivet.com, our Internet site in the United Kingdom, www.centaurweb.co.uk, and customized Internet sites that we maintain for two of our largest customers, Banfield and Feeders’ Advantage. Customers can use our Internet sites to order products, learn more about products and vendor programs, print forms needed for their veterinary practice, review their historical purchases and manage their inventory.  For our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, approximately 39%, 36% and 34%, respectively, of our product sales in the United States, excluding revenues related to Micro, were generated through orders placed over the Internet.  In the United Kingdom, over 90% of our orders are placed electronically.

Product Sourcing

We currently do not manufacture the vast majority of our products and are dependent on vendors for our supply of products. We believe that effective purchasing is a key factor in maintaining our position as a leading provider of animal health care products. We regularly assess our purchasing needs and our vendors’ product offerings and prices to obtain products at favorable prices. While we purchase products from many vendors and there is generally more than one vendor for most animal health product categories, our concentration of aggregate purchases with key vendors is significant. In the United States, our ten largest vendors accounted for approximately 71% of our revenues for the each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010. Pfizer supplied products that accounted for approximately 20%, 24% and 25% of our revenues for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Of the Pfizer supplied products, production animal products under a livestock products agreement accounted for approximately 11%, 13% and 12% of our revenues for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Merck (formerly known as Intervet/Schering-Plough), supplied products that accounted for approximately 15%, 11% and 10% of our revenues for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Merial Limited (“Merial”), a subsidiary of Sanofi-Aventis, supplies the majority of their products to us under an agency relationship.  Commission revenue generated from Merial products accounted for approximately 52%, 47% and 49% of total commission revenues for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

There are two major types of transactions that can affect the flow of our products from our vendors, through us, to our customers. The method of selling products to veterinarians is dictated by our vendors. Traditional “buy/sell” transactions, which account for the vast majority of our business, involve the direct purchase of products by us from vendors, which we manage and typically store in our warehouses. A customer then places an order with us, and the order is then picked, packed, shipped and invoiced by us to our customer, followed by payment from our customer to us.

We also sell certain product lines to our customers under agency agreements with some of our vendors. Under this model, when we receive orders for products from the customer, we transmit the order to the vendor who then picks, packs and ships the products direct to our customers. In some cases our vendor invoices and collects payment from our customer, while in other cases we invoice and collect payment from our customer. We receive a commission payment for soliciting the order and for providing other customer service activities. Our operating expenses associated with agency sales transactions are lower than in traditional “buy/sell” transactions.

8

We have written agreements with approximately 50 of our vendors. Our livestock products agreement with Pfizer provides that we shall supply selected customers in the livestock field with Pfizer products. In return, we are entitled to a fee for logistics. We are not entitled to any rebates under this contract.  We are required to maintain sufficient inventory to meet our anticipated demand on a monthly basis and to store the Pfizer products in accordance with their respective label instructions. Pfizer also reserves the right to sell directly to our customers or any other party. The livestock products agreement has a one-year term that expires on December 31, 2012 and can be terminated by either party with or without cause upon 30 days written notice.  The livestock products agreement is a non-exclusive “buy-sell” contract.

Our equine products marketing agreement with Pfizer provides that we shall distribute certain products to customers in the equine field.  In return, we are entitled to receive certain service incentives and rebates.  We are required to maintain sufficient staffing levels of sales representatives and store and handle inventory under appropriate conditions that will maintain the quality and integrity of the products.  The agreement expires on December 31, 2012 and can be terminated by either party with or without cause upon 30 days prior written notice.  The equine products marketing agreement is a non-exclusive “buy-sell” contract.

Animal health product vendors may implement sales promotions or price changes for products distributed to veterinarians that can affect the period in which we recognize revenues. In addition, at the time we negotiate vendor agreements for the upcoming year, our vendors typically establish sales growth goals for us to meet in order to receive performance rebates or may reduce or eliminate rebate opportunities. These growth goals may be based on quarterly, semi-annual or annual targets.

Product returns from our customers and to our vendors occur in the ordinary course of business. We extend our customers the same return of goods policies as are extended to us by our vendors. We do not believe that our operations will be adversely impacted due to the return of products.

Distribution

As of September 30, 2012, we distributed our products from fourteen strategically located distribution centers throughout the United States and one in the United Kingdom.  During our fiscal year 2012, we completed the move of our distribution center near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania to a larger facility.  During our fiscal year 2011, we completed the move of our distribution center in Visalia, California to a larger facility.

We maintain inventory levels in our warehouses appropriate to satisfy customer demand for prompt delivery and fulfillment of their product orders. Inventory levels are managed on a daily basis through our information systems. In order to meet the rapid delivery requirements of our customers, we offer next-day delivery service on most of the products we stock in our warehouses. We estimate that during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, we shipped same day from our warehouses approximately 98% of the dollar value of orders placed by our customers. We currently ship the majority of our orders in the United States through United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) with the balance of our orders being shipped by our own delivery trucks, local carriers, regional carriers and other national carriers.  Products shipped out of the Centaur and Micro facilities are primarily shipped by our own delivery trucks.

Competition

The distribution and manufacture of animal health products is highly competitive. We compete with numerous vendors and distributors based on customer relationships, service and delivery, product selection, price and e-commerce capabilities. Most of our products are available from several sources, including other distributors and vendors, and our customers tend to have relationships with several distributors. In addition, our competitors could obtain exclusive rights to distribute certain products, eliminating our ability to distribute those products. Consolidation in the veterinary distribution business could result in existing competitors increasing their market share, which could give them greater pricing power, decrease our revenues and profitability, and increase the competition for customers. Our primary competitors in the United States, excluding vendors, include the following:

· Animal Health International, Inc.;

· Butler Schein Animal Health;

· IVESCO;

9

· Midwest Veterinary Supply;

· Webster Veterinary Supply, a division of Patterson Companies, Inc.; and

· other national, regional, local and specialty distributors.

The role of the animal health product distributor has changed dramatically during the last decade. Successful distributors are increasingly providing value-added services in addition to the products they have traditionally provided. We believe that to remain competitive we must continue to add value to the distribution channel, while removing unnecessary costs associated with product movement.

Seasonality in Operating Results

Our quarterly sales and operating results have varied significantly in the past, and will likely continue to do so in the future. Historically, our total revenues have typically been higher during the spring and fall months due to increased sales of production animal products. The sales of production animal products can vary due to changes in commodity prices and weather patterns (e.g. droughts or seasons of higher precipitation that determine how long cattle will graze and consequently the number of days an animal is on feed during a finishing phase) which may also affect seasonality.  Product use cycles for production animal products are directly related to medical procedures performed by veterinarians on production animals during the spring and fall months. These buying patterns can also be affected by vendors’ and distributors’ marketing programs or price increase announcements, which can cause veterinarians to purchase production animal health products earlier than those products are needed. This kind of early purchasing may reduce our sales in the months these purchases would have otherwise been made. See “Risk Factors — Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly, and these fluctuations may cause our stock price to fall.” Additionally, while we accrue rebates as they are earned, our rebates have historically been highest during the quarter ended December 31, since some of our vendors’ rebate programs were designed to include targets to be achieved near the end of the calendar year. This trend has slowed some in recent years due to certain changes in vendor contracts but it still remains our largest quarter for vendor rebates.

Intellectual Property

We have registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office the marks “MWI,” “MWI Design,” “MWIVET.com,” “VETONE,” “PROXYRx” and “ANIMAL Rx PHARMACY,” among others.  We believe that the MWI mark is well recognized in the animal health products industry and by veterinarians and is therefore a valuable asset of ours.

Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights. There are always risks that third parties may claim we are infringing upon their intellectual property rights and we could be prevented from selling our products, or suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses as a result of these claims. See “Risk Factors – If third parties claim that we infringe upon their intellectual property rights, our financial results could be adversely affected.” In addition, third parties may infringe upon or design around our intellectual property rights, and we may expend significant resources enforcing our rights or suffer competitive injury with adverse effects on our business and results of operations. See “Risk Factors – Our intellectual property rights may be inadequate to protect our business.”

Employees

As of September 30, 2012, we had 1,413 employees across the United States and 216 employees in the United Kingdom. We have not experienced a shortage of qualified personnel in the past, and believe that we will be able to attract such employees in the future. None of our employees are a party to a collective bargaining agreement, and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.

Website

Our website address is www.mwivet.com and can be used to access free of charge, through the investor relations category, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with or furnish it to the SEC.  The information on our website is not incorporated as a part of this annual report.  The public can also obtain copies of these reports by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington DC 20549, or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330, or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

10

Governmental Regulation

Certain of our businesses involve the distribution of pharmaceuticals, and in this regard we are subject to various local, state, federal and foreign governmental laws and regulations applicable to the distribution of pharmaceuticals.  Our vendors of pharmaceuticals, vaccines, parasiticides and certain controlled substances are typically regulated by federal agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”), as well as most similar state agencies. Therefore, we are subject, either directly or indirectly, to regulation by the same agencies. Most states and the DEA require us to be registered or otherwise keep a current permit or license to handle controlled substances. Manufacturers of vaccines are required by the USDA to comply with various storage and shipping criteria and requirements for vaccines. To the extent we distribute such products, we must comply with the same requirements, including, without limitation, the storage and shipping requirements for vaccines.

Most state boards of pharmacy require us to be licensed in their respective states for the sale of pharmaceutical products and medical devices within their jurisdictions. As a distributor of prescription pharmaceutical products, we are subject to the Prescription Drug Marketing Act (“PDMA”). The PDMA provides governance and authority to the states to provide minimum standards, terms and conditions for the licensing by state licensing authorities of persons who “engage” in wholesale distribution (as defined by each state regulatory agency) in interstate commerce of prescription drugs. With this authority, states require site-specific registrations for the parties that engage in the selling and/or physical distribution of pharmaceutical products into their state in the form of out-of-state registrations. The federal pedigree regulations of the FDA under the PDMA require tracking human labeled prescription products through the entire distribution chain and are applicable to distributors that do not have a written agreement with the manufacturer granting the wholesale distributor status as an “Authorized Distributor of Record.” Selling and/or distributing products without the appropriate registrations may subject us to fines, penalties, misdemeanor or felony convictions, and/or seizure of the products involved. We have a Manager of Regulatory Compliance and have engaged outside consultants as needed to assist us in meeting and complying with the various state and federal licensure requirements to which we are subject.

In order to supply pharmaceutical products in the United Kingdom, we must comply with the requirements of the applicable regulatory bodies. The Veterinary Medicines Directorate regulates the use of veterinary products and the Medicines Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority regulates the use of human medicinal products within the United Kingdom.

Our pet cremation business is subject to state and local zoning laws, and we are required to maintain permits for the construction and operation of an animal incineration device. We are also required to have an air pollution permit in connection with the operation of our pet cremation business.

Some states (as well as certain cities and counties) require us to collect sales taxes/use taxes on certain types of animal products. We are also subject to laws governing our relationship with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working conditions and citizenship requirements. In addition, we are subject to additional regulations regarding our hiring practices because several federal, state and local governmental agencies are our customers.

Environmental Considerations

We do not currently manufacture or alter in any way the composition of the vast majority of the products that we distribute. All products are distributed in compliance with the relevant rules and regulations as approved by various state and federal agencies.

11

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth the names, ages and titles, as well as a brief account of the business experience, of each person who was an executive officer of the Company as of the date of the filing:

Name	Age	Title
James F. Cleary, Jr.	49	Board Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Mary Patricia B. Thompson	49	Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer
Jeffrey J. Danielson	52	Vice President of Sales
John J. Francis	59	Vice President and General Manager of the Specialty Resources Group
Bryan P. Mooney	44	Vice President of Operations
Kevin W. Price	44	Vice President of Inventory Management
John R. Ryan Alden J. Sutherland	43 49	Vice President of Marketing Vice President and Chief Information Officer

James F. Cleary, Jr. has served as President since March 2000 and Chief Executive Officer since June 2002. Mr. Cleary has also been a member of the board of directors since June 2002. He joined MWI in January 1998 as Director of National Accounts and was promoted to Vice President of Demand Generation in 1999. Mr. Cleary was Vice President of Agri Beef Co., MWI’s former parent, from 1996 to 1998. From 1990 to 1996, Mr. Cleary was employed in management positions with Morrison Knudsen Corporation and its affiliate MK Rail Corporation. Mr. Cleary graduated from Dartmouth College in 1985 with a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and received his Masters of Business Administration from Harvard Business School in 1990. Mr. Cleary is also a manager of Feeders’ Advantage, L.L.C. Mr. Cleary is the brother-in-law of Mr. Robert Rebholtz, a member of our board of directors.

Mary Patricia B. Thompson, CPA has served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer since August 2006, with oversight of finance, regulatory compliance, inventory management, information technology, and human resources.  Prior to August 2006, Ms. Thompson had been the Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer since June 2002. Ms. Thompson joined Agri Beef Co. in 1989 as the Feedlot and Commodity Division Controller. In September 1991, Ms. Thompson was promoted to Controller of MWI Veterinary Supply Co., then a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agri Beef Co. Prior to joining Agri Beef Co., Ms. Thompson worked for Arthur Andersen LLP from 1985 to 1989, where she provided auditing and accounting services. Ms. Thompson graduated from the University of Idaho in 1985, summa cum laude, with a Bachelor of Science in Accounting. Ms. Thompson is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the state of Idaho. Ms. Thompson is a member of the board of directors and past-president of the American Veterinary Distributors Association.  Ms. Thompson is also a member of the University of Idaho College of Business and Economics Advisory Board.

Jeffrey J. Danielson has served as Vice President of Sales since 2001. Mr. Danielson joined MWI in 1985 as an Outside Sales Representative, serving the state of Washington. From 1989 to 1991, Mr. Danielson served as Assistant Sales Manager and from 1991 to 2001 served as National Sales Manager. Mr. Danielson graduated from Colorado State University in 1983 with a Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Business.

John J. Francis has served as Vice President and General Manager of the Specialty Resources Group since September 2006.  Prior to joining MWI, Mr. Francis worked for Webster Veterinary Supply as the Vice President of Sales from April 2004 to September 2006.  Mr. Francis was the Key Account Manager of Excel, a division of Cargill, Inc., from June 2002 to April 2004 and was the Vice President of Sales for Future Beef based in Parker, Colorado, from May 2000 to May 2002. From 1990 until 2000, Mr. Francis served as General Manager and then President of MWI Veterinary Supply Co. Mr. Francis graduated from Michigan State University in 1975 with a Bachelor of Science in Animal Husbandry and holds a Master of Science in Animal Science obtained in 1977 from the University of Illinois.  Mr. Francis is a member of the board of directors and president of Vedco, Inc.

12

Bryan P. Mooney has served as Vice President of Operations since May 2005. Mr. Mooney joined MWI in January 1994 as the Operations Manager of our Denver, Colorado distribution operation and served in that capacity until May 1998. From May 1998 until February 2005, Mr. Mooney served as Manager of Transportation and Logistics and from January 2005 until May 2005 as the Western Regional Operations Manager. Mr. Mooney graduated from the University of Wyoming in 1991 with a Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Business.

Kevin W. Price has served as Vice President of Inventory Management since October 1, 2011. From 2003 to 2011, Mr. Price served as Purchasing Manager.  In 1998, Mr. Price was promoted to Food Animal Product Manager.  Mr. Price joined MWI in April 1989 in our Nampa distribution center. Mr. Price graduated from Northwest Nazarene University in 2010 with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration.  In 2007, Mr. Price filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, and Mr. Price has informed the Company that he is performing his obligations in full under the plan.  Mr. Price has also informed the Company that he intends to make additional payments outside of the plan so that his legitimate creditors will be paid in full when all payments are completed.

John R. Ryan has served as Vice President of Marketing since 2000. Mr. Ryan joined MWI in June 1995 as an Outside Sales Representative and served in such capacity until June 2000. Prior to joining MWI, Mr. Ryan worked for the Virbac Corporation (a companion animal pharmaceutical company) as a Territory Manager from 1993 to 1995. Mr. Ryan graduated from the University of California, Davis in 1993 with a Bachelor of Science in Animal Physiology.

Alden J. Sutherland joined MWI in January 2012 and has served as Vice President and Chief Information Officer since April 1, 2012.  Prior to joining MWI, he served as President of Exploridor since January 2011.  Prior to Exploridor, he served as President of Pristine Pools and Spas from 2010 to 2011.  He served as Chief Information Officer at Jostens, Inc. in Minneapolis, Minnesota from 2006 to 2010.  From 2000 to 2006, he served as Chief Information Officer at Entegris, Inc.  From 1987 to 2000, he held various leadership and I.T. positions for Novartis in its former Seed and Crop Protection Divisions, including Director of I.T. in the United States, Head of I.T., Finance and Planning for the Asia Pacific Region, Head of Finance, I.T. and Operations for the Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union Region and Controller for Europe and Latin America.  Mr. Sutherland graduated from Boise State University in 1988 with a Bachelor of Business Administration.

13

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the following are important factors which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.

Our operating results may fluctuate due to factors outside of management’s control.

Our future revenues and results of operations may significantly fluctuate due to a combination of factors, many of which are outside of management’s control. The most notable of these factors include:

·   the impact of vendor consolidation on our business;

·   changes in or availability of vendor contracts or rebate programs;

·   exclusivity requirements with certain vendors that may prohibit us from distributing competing products manufactured by other vendors or margin reductions if we become a non-exclusive distributor;

·   transitional challenges associated with acquisitions, including the failure to achieve anticipated synergies;

·   vendor rebates based upon attaining certain growth goals;

·   changes in the way vendors introduce/deliver products to market;

·   a disruption caused by adverse weather (i.e. drought) or other natural conditions or disasters;

·   possible changes in the use of feed additives (antibiotics, growth promotants) used in the production animal markets due to trade restrictions, consumer concern and/or government regulations;

·   seasonality;

·   unforeseen litigation;

·   risks associated with our international operations;

·   financial risks associated with acquisitions and investments;

·   the impact of general economic trends on our business;

·   the recall of a significant product by one of our vendors;

·   extended shortage or backorder of a significant product by one of our vendors;

·   the timing and effectiveness of marketing programs or price changes offered by our vendors;

·   the timing of the introduction of new products and services by our vendors;

·   our intellectual property rights may be inadequate to protect our business;

·   the ability to borrow on our revolving credit facility, extend the terms of our revolving credit facility or obtain alternative financing on favorable terms or at all;

·   risks from potential increases in variable interest rates;

·   the impact of tightening credit standards and/or access to credit on behalf of our customers and suppliers;

·   inability to ship products to the customer as a result of technological or shipping disruptions; and

·   competition.

These factors could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. We may be unable to reduce operating expenses quickly enough to offset any unexpected shortfall in revenues or gross profit. If we have a shortfall in revenues or gross profit without a corresponding reduction to expenses, operating results may suffer. Our operating results for any particular fiscal year or quarter may not be indicative of future operating results. You should not rely on year-to-year or quarter-to-quarter comparisons of results of operations as an indication of our future performance.

14

Consolidation among our vendors could be harmful to our business.

In the recent past, there have been two large acquisitions affecting our largest vendors.  In October 2009, Pfizer completed its acquisition of Wyeth.  Pfizer and Fort Dodge, a division of Wyeth, were our two largest vendors as measured by our revenues at the time of that acquisition.  In November 2009, Merck and Schering-Plough completed their merger under which Merck acquired all of the outstanding stock of Schering-Plough. These were two of our largest vendors at the time of the merger.  Additionally, on July 7, 2011, Pfizer, who is our largest vendor as measured by our revenues, issued a press release stating that they were considering a spin-off, sale or other transaction of their animal health business.

The surviving companies from these types of transactions could end up with higher market shares with respect to certain animal health products, and they could use their increased leverage in the channel to negotiate terms with distributors that are materially worse to the distributor than the terms that we have been able to negotiate with the companies individually while they were competing with each other. There is also a possibility of product disruption as these companies integrate their operations which could adversely impact our financial results.  Further consolidation could result in our vendors further increasing their market share, which could give vendors greater pricing power and make it easier for such vendors to sell their products directly to animal health customers, both of which could decrease our net sales and profitability.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations depend upon maintaining our relationships with vendors.

We currently do not manufacture the vast majority of our products and are dependent on our vendors for our supply of products. Our ten largest vendors supplied products that accounted for approximately 71% of our revenues for each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Pfizer supplied products that accounted for approximately 20%, 24% and 25% of our revenues for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Of the Pfizer supplied products, production animal products under a livestock agreement accounted for approximately 11%, 13% and 12% of our revenues for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Merck, formerly known as Intervet/Schering-Plough, supplied products that accounted for approximately 15%, 11% and 10% of our revenues for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Merial, a subsidiary of Sanofi-Aventis, supplies the majority of their products under an agency relationship.  Commission revenue generated from Merial products accounted for approximately 52%, 47% and 49% of total commission revenues for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Our ability to sustain our gross profits has been, and will continue to be, dependent in part upon our ability to obtain favorable terms and access to new and existing products from our vendors. These terms may be subject to changes from time to time by vendors, such as changing from a “buy/sell” to an agency relationship, or from an agency to a “buy/sell” relationship which could adversely affect our revenues and operating income. The loss of one or more of our large vendors, a material reduction in their supply of products to us or material changes in the terms we obtain from them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Vendors may also choose to change the method in which products are taken to market.  For example, a vendor may change our relationship from a complete distribution provider, including logistics and sales support, to only a logistics provider or only a sales support provider.  Only doing one of these services would reduce our margin on any sale.  A change in the method in which products are taken to market caused by any vendor could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Some of our current and future vendors may decide to compete with us in the future by pursuing or increasing their efforts in direct marketing and sales of their products. These vendors could sell their products at lower prices and maintain a higher gross margin on their product sales than we can. In this event, veterinarians or animal owners may elect to purchase animal health products directly from these vendors.  As an example of this type of event, we were a sales agent for a pet food line for most of fiscal year 2011 that we did not represent in fiscal year 2012 because that manufacturer chose to sell their products direct and not through sales agents.  Increased competition from any vendor of animal health products could significantly reduce our market share and adversely impact our financial results.

15

An adverse change in vendor rebates could negatively affect our business.

The terms on which we purchase or sell products from many vendors of animal health products may entitle us to receive a rebate based on the attainment of certain growth goals. Vendors may adversely change the terms of or eliminate some or all of these rebate programs at any time without notice. Because the amount of rebates we earn is directly related to the attainment of pre-determined sales growth goals, and because the nature of the rebate programs and the amount of rebates available are determined by the vendors, there can be no assurance as to the amount of rebates that we will earn in any given year. Changes to or elimination of any rebate program initiated by our vendors may have a material effect on our gross profit and our operating results in any given quarter or year. Vendors may reduce or eliminate rebates offered under their programs, interpret the terms of their rebate programs in a way that is adverse to usor increase the growth goals or other conditions we must meet to earn rebates to levels that we cannot achieve. Additionally, factors outside of our control, such as customer preferences or vendor supply issues, can have a material impact on our ability to achieve the growth goals established by our vendors, which may reduce the amount of rebates we receive. The occurrence of any of these events could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly, and these fluctuations may cause our stock price to fall.

Our quarterly revenues and operating results have varied significantly in the past, and may continue to do so in the future. While we accrue rebates from vendors as they are earned, our rebates have historically been highest during the quarter ended December 31, since most of our vendors’ rebate programs were designed to include targets to be achieved during the calendar year.  Historically, our revenues have been seasonal, with peak sales in the spring and fall months. The seasonal nature of our business is directly tied to the buying patterns of veterinarians for production animal health products used for certain medical procedures performed on production animals during the spring and fall months. These buying patterns can also be affected by vendors’ and distributors’ marketing programs or price increase announcements, which can cause veterinarians to purchase production animal health products earlier than those products are used. This kind of early purchasing may reduce our sales in the months these purchases would have otherwise been made. Additionally, the production animal market can be affected by volatility in commodity prices such as milk, corn, grain and feeder cattle, changes in weather patterns (e.g. droughts or seasons of higher precipitation that determine how long cattle will graze and consequently the number of days an animal is on feed during a finishing phase) or a change in the general economy, which can shift the timing of when animals are treated and to what extent they are treated.  This shift in treatment may have a significant impact on the timing of purchases.  While companion animal products tend to have a different product use cycle than production animal health products, and approximately 57% of our revenues in the United States have been generated from sales to the companion animal market, we cannot assure you that our revenues and operating results will not continue to fluctuate on a quarter-to-quarter basis. We believe period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful as our future revenue and results of operations may vary substantially. It is also possible that in future quarters our results of operations will be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In either case, the price of our common stock could decline, possibly materially.

Our business may be directly and indirectly affected by the current drought that could reduce demand for the products we distribute.  

Poor or unusual weather conditions, in particular the current drought in the Midwestern United States, can significantly affect the purchasing decisions of the Company’s customers, particularly customers in the production animal market.  The timing and quantity of rainfall are two of the most important factors in agricultural production. Drought can affect the availability and price of feed for livestock.  Faced with a reduction in readily available feed or an increase in costs for such feed, our customers may decide to reduce herd size, which would ultimately decrease the demand for the products we distribute, including micro feed ingredients, animal health products, dairy sanitation solutions, as well as the development and implementation of proprietary computerized systems for feed, health, information and production animal management.

Our market is highly competitive. Failure to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The market for veterinary distribution services is highly competitive, continually evolving and subject to technological change. We compete with numerous vendors and distributors based on customer relationships, service and delivery, product selection, price and e-commerce capabilities.  Our primary competitors in the United States, excluding vendors, include the following:

16

· Animal Health International, Inc;

· Butler Schein Animal Health;

· IVESCO;

· Midwest Veterinary Supply;

· Webster Veterinary Supply, a division of Patterson Companies, Inc.; and

· other national, regional, local and specialty distributors.

Some of our competitors may have more customers, stronger brand recognition or greater financial, technological and other resources than we do. Most of our products are available from several sources, including other distributors and vendors, and our customers typically have relationships with several distributors and vendors. Many of our competitors have comparable product lines, technical expertise or distribution strategies that directly compete with us and some of our competitors own practice management software, which they can offer to customers. Our competitors could obtain exclusive rights to distribute certain products, eliminating our ability to distribute those products. The entry of new or additional distributors in the industry could also have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete. Additionally, some of our vendors may decide to compete with us by selling their products directly to our customers. If we do not compete successfully against these organizations, it could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Consolidation in the veterinary distribution business and veterinary practices may decrease our revenues and profitability.

Consolidation in the veterinary distribution business could result in existing competitors increasing their market share, which could give them greater pricing power, decrease our revenues and profitability, and increase the competition for customers. Consolidation of the many small, privately-held veterinary practices would result in an increasing number of larger veterinary practices, which could have increased purchasing leverage and the ability to negotiate lower product costs. This could reduce our operating margins and negatively impact our revenues and profitability. Any of these developments could result in increased marketing expenses and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Exclusivity requirements and failures to continue relationships with vendors may cause us to lose access to certain products and erode our market share.

We may not be able to establish or maintain relationships with key vendors in the animal health industry if we have established relationships with competitors of these key vendors. We have written agreements with approximately 50 of our vendors. Some of our agreements with vendors are for one-year periods. Upon expiration, we may not be able to renew our existing agreements on favorable terms, or at all.

In addition, vendors may require us to distribute their products on an exclusive basis, which would cause us to forego distributing competing products that may also be profitable, including generic products that may gain increased market share.  In this situation we are often forced to project future sales of competing products so that we can elect to distribute the product that we believe will be more profitable.  Our projections may not be correct, and we may be contractually prohibited from distributing products that gain market share, including generic products, at the expense of the products that we distribute.  Competitors of ours could also obtain exclusive rights to market particular products, which we would be unable to market. If we lose the right to distribute products under such agreements, or are required to exclusively distribute certain products at the expense of others that may be more profitable, we may lose access to certain products and lose a competitive advantage. Potential competitors could sell products from vendors that we fail to continue with and erode our market share.  Additionally, if we have a reduction in our gross margin as a result of switching from an exclusive distributor to a non-exclusive distributor, the gross margin generated from the additional products that we are able to sell may not be enough to offset the decrease.

17

Increases in over-the-counter sales of animal health products or sales of products from non-veterinarian sources could adversely affect our business.

We rely, and will continue to rely, on animal owners who purchase their animal health products directly from veterinarians, which we refer to as the ethical channel.  Animal health products are increasingly becoming available from sources other than the ethical channel, including human or Internet pharmacies and other over-the-counter channels such as Walmart, Target and Costco.  As the availability of animal health products from alternative sources increases, there can be no assurance that animal owners will continue to use the ethical channel, and will not purchase animal health products from sources other than veterinarians.  Increased competition from any distributor of animal health products making use of an over-the-counter channel or the passage of legislation such as the proposed Fairness to Pet Owners Act of 2011 (“HR 1406”), which seeks to require veterinarians to issue prescriptions to clients, further enabling pet owners to purchase animal health products from sources other than a veterinarian, could lead to increased competition from distributors of animal health products making use of non-veterinarian channels to distribute their products.  Any such increased competition from non-ethical channels could significantly reduce our market share and adversely impact our financial results.

An economic downturn could materially adversely affect our business.

Our business may be materially adversely affected by negative trends in the general economy that could reduce consumer discretionary spending on animal health products and reduce or eliminate sources of credit available to our customers. Levels of consumer spending deteriorated during the economic recession in the United States and may not increase for the foreseeable future.  Some of the factors that could influence the levels of consumer spending include continuing increases in fuel and other energy costs, conditions in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, unemployment levels, healthcare costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior.  In addition, volatility in commodity prices such as milk, corn, grain and feeder cattle, changes in weather patterns (e.g. droughts or seasons of higher precipitation that determine how long cattle will graze) and changes in the general economy may adversely impact the amount spent by animal owners in the production animal market.  Such volatility and/or tightening of credit available to our customers could further deteriorate the financial condition of our customers, and may ultimately lead our customers to reduce their working capital available to purchase our products.

Our business ultimately depends on the ability and willingness of animal owners to pay for our products. This dependence could make us more vulnerable to any reduction in consumer confidence or disposable income than companies in other industries that are less reliant on consumer spending, such as the human health care industry, in which a large portion of payments are made by insurance programs.  Additionally, any cost-cutting measures taken to offset the effects of an economic downturn could materially impact our ability to generate future revenue growth.  For all of these reasons, an economic downturn could materially affect our business.

Demand from customers in the production animal market may be affected by a decrease in the sale and consumption of protein products due to increased consumer concern, loss of export markets, international trade restrictions and/or governmental regulations.

Recently, there has been consumer concern and consumer activism with respect to the use of antibiotics and growth promotants in animal feed as well as the consumption of protein (defined as beef, dairy, swine or poultry although MWI revenues come primarily from only beef, dairy and swine) products generally.  A sustained campaign of negative press resulting from media or consumer advocacy groups, industry litigation, loss of export markets or other factors could adversely affect the public’s perception of the industry as a whole, lead to reluctance by customers to buy protein or other products.  The resulting negative impact on the production animal market can strongly affect demand for the products we distribute.  In addition, heightened consumer concern over the use of antibiotics and growth promotants in animal feed could result in increased government regulation in response to that concern.  Any such negative press or increased governmental regulation may affect the growth of the production animal market and lead to a decrease in the sales of the products we distribute which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

18

Any inability of our customers to pay us for our products and services due to their deteriorating financial condition or otherwise may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We generally extend some level of credit to our customers without requiring collateral, which exposes us to credit risk.  For example, milk price declines in the dairy market could have a significant impact on dairy farmers, which would create cash-flow challenges for these farmers and, in turn, impact the time it takes for us to collect on outstanding accounts receivable from these customers.  If customers’ cash flow or operating and financial performance deteriorates, or if they are unable to make scheduled payments or obtain other sources of credit, they may not be able to pay or may delay payment to us, or in some cases may return products to us. The financial difficulties of a customer could cause us to curtail business with that customer or the customer to reduce its business with us and cancel orders.  Any inability of current and/or potential customers to pay us for our products and/or services due to their deteriorating financial condition or otherwise may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Difficulties with the integration of acquisitions or the improvement of the performance of acquired companies may impose substantial costs and delays and cause other unanticipated problems for us.

Acquisitions involve a number of risks relating to our ability to integrate an acquired business into our existing operations. The process of integrating or improving the performance of the operations of an acquired business, particularly its personnel, could cause interruptions to our business. Some of the risks we face include:

· the need to spend substantial operational, financial and management resources in integrating new businesses, technologies and products, and difficulties management may encounter in integrating or improving the performance of the operations, personnel or systems of the acquired business;

· retention of key personnel, customers and vendors of the acquired business;

· the occurrence of a material adverse effect on our existing business relationships with customers or vendors, or both, resulting from future acquisitions or business combinations could lead to a termination of or otherwise affect our relationships with such customers or vendors;

· impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets; and

· contingent and latent risks associated with the past operations of, and other unanticipated costs and problems arising in, an acquired business.

If we are unable to successfully integrate the operations of an acquired business into our operations, we could be required to undertake unanticipated changes. These changes could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, it may be difficult to manage rapid growth from our acquired companies in the future, and the future success of our acquisitions depends on our ability to implement and/or maintain:

· sales and marketing programs;

· customer service levels;

· current and new product and service lines and vendor relationships;

· technological support which equals or exceeds our competitors;

· recruitment and training of new personnel; and

· operational and financial control systems.

If we are not able to manage our rapid growth from our acquisitions, there is a risk our customer service quality could deteriorate which may in turn lead to decreased sales or profitability. Also, due to acquisitions the cost of our operations could increase faster than growth in our revenues, negatively impacting our profitability.

Risks associated with our international operations.

On February 8, 2010, we acquired the outstanding share capital of Centaur.  Centaur is based in the United Kingdom and uses the British pound as its functional currency.  Prior to this acquisition, we had very limited exposure to international risks. International operations are subject to risks that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.  The risks that our international operations are subject to include, among other things:

·   difficulties and costs relating to staffing and managing foreign operations;

19

·   difficulties in establishing channels of distribution;

·   fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies;

·   repatriation of cash from our foreign operations to the United States;

·   regulatory requirements;

·   foreign countries may impose additional withholding taxes or otherwise tax our foreign income;

·   separate operating and financial systems;

·   disaster recovery;

·   unexpected difficulties in importing or exporting our products;

·   imposition of import/export duties, quotas, sanctions or penalties;

·   liability related to the defined benefit plan; and

·   unexpected regulatory, economic and political changes in foreign markets.

Our financial results could be adversely affected by foreign exchange fluctuations.

We operate in both the United States and the United Kingdom, but report revenues, costs and earnings in U.S. dollars. Exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the British pound sterling are likely to fluctuate from period to period. Because our financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, we are subject to the risk of translation losses for reporting purposes. If we continue to expand our international operations, we will conduct more transactions in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. To the extent that foreign revenue and expense transactions are not denominated in the local currency, we are also subject to the risk of transaction losses. Given the volatility of exchange rates, there is no assurance that we will be able to effectively manage currency transaction and/or translation risks. We have not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We only have one distribution center in the United Kingdom and any catastrophic event could materially impact our results.

We conduct all of our fulfillment operations in the United Kingdom from our distribution center in Castle Cary, England. This facility contains all of our product inventory. A natural disaster or other catastrophic event, such as an earthquake, fire, flood, severe storm, break-in, server or systems failure, terrorist attack, or other comparable event at this facility would cause interruptions or delays in our business and loss of inventory and could render us unable to process or fulfill customer orders in a timely manner, or at all. Further, we have a limited disaster recovery plan, and our business interruption insurance may not adequately compensate us for losses that may occur, including with respect to any lost profits for any period in which the business is not able to operate.  In the event that a significant part of this facility was destroyed or our operations were interrupted for any extended period of time, our business, financial condition, and operating results would be harmed.

We rely substantially on third-party vendors, and the loss of products or delays in product availability from one or more third-party vendors could substantially harm our business.

We must contract for the supply of current and future products of appropriate quantity, quality and cost. These products must be available on a timely basis and be in compliance with any regulatory requirements. Failure to do so could substantially harm our business.

We often purchase products from our vendors under agreements that typically have a term of one year and can be terminated on a periodic basis. There can be no assurance, however, that our vendors will be able to meet their obligations under these agreements or that we will be able to compel them to do so. Risks of relying on vendors include:

20

·   If an existing agreement expires or a certain product line is discontinued or recalled, then we would not be able to continue to offer our customers the same breadth of products and our sales and operating results would likely suffer unless we are able to find an alternate supply of a similar product.

·   If market demand for our products increases suddenly, our current vendors might not be able to fulfill our commercial needs, which would require us to seek new manufacturing arrangements or find new sources of supply, and may result in substantial delays in meeting market demand. If we consistently generate more demand for a product than a given vendor is capable of handling, it could lead to large backorders and potentially lost sales to competitive products that are more readily available.

·   We may not be able to control or adequately monitor the quality of products we receive from our vendors. Poor quality products could damage our reputation with our customers.

·   Some of our third party vendors are subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspection by regulatory authorities, including the FDA, the USDA, the EPA, the DEA and the PDMA, as well as other federal and state agencies for compliance with strictly enforced regulations. We do not have control over our vendors’ compliance with these regulations and standards. Violations could potentially lead to interruptions in supply that could lead to lost sales to competitive products that are more readily available.

·   If a vendor is unable to obtain the necessary credit to manage their business, they may not be able to deliver their products to us.

Potential problems with vendors such as those discussed above could substantially decrease sales of our products, lead to higher costs and damage our reputation with our customers.

We rely upon third parties to ship products to our customers and interruptions in their operations could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We use UPS as our primary delivery service for our air and ground domestic shipments of products to our customers. If there were any significant service interruptions, there can be no assurance that we could engage alternative service providers to deliver these products in either a timely or cost-efficient manner, particularly in rural areas where many of our customers are located. Any labor disputes, slowdowns, transportation disruptions or other adverse conditions in the transportation industry experienced by UPS could impair or disrupt our ability to deliver our products to our customers on a timely basis, and could have a material adverse effect upon our customer relationships, business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, rising fuel costs may result in continued increases in shipping costs charged by UPS, or other delivery service providers, and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The loss of one or more significant customers could adversely affect our profitability.

Our two largest customers, Banfield and Feeders’ Advantage (a related party), accounted for approximately 6% and 3%, respectively, of our product sales for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, 6% and 4%, respectively, of our product sales for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and 9% and 4%, respectively, of our product sales for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2010. Our ten largest customers, excluding Banfield and Feeders’ Advantage, accounted for approximately 6%, 3% and 5% of our product sales for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our business and results of operations could be adversely affected if the business of these customers was lost. We cannot guarantee that we will maintain or improve our relationships with these customers or that we will continue to supply these customers at current levels. Banfield, Feeders’ Advantage and other customers may seek to purchase some of the products that we currently sell directly from the vendors or from one or more of our competitors. Furthermore, our customers are not required to purchase any minimum amount of products from us. The loss of Banfield or Feeders’ Advantage or deterioration in our relations with either of them could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, deterioration in the financial condition of one or more of our customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

If we fail to comply with or become subject to more onerous government regulations, our business could be adversely affected.

The veterinary distribution industry is subject to changing political and regulatory influences. Both state and federal government agencies regulate the distribution of certain animal health products and we are subject to regulation, either directly or indirectly, by the FDA, the USDA, the EPA, the DEA and comparable state agencies. As a distributor of prescription pharmaceutical products, we are also subject to the PDMA, which provides for minimum standards, terms and conditions to be maintained for licensing as a distributor.  The regulatory stance these agencies take could change. Our vendors are subject to regulation by the FDA, the USDA, the EPA, the DEA, and the PDMA, as well as other federal and state agencies, and material changes to the applicable regulations could affect our vendors’ ability to manufacture certain products, which could adversely impact our product supply. In addition, some of our customers may rely, in part, on farm and agricultural subsidy programs. Changes in the regulatory positions that impact the availability of funding for such programs could have an adverse impact on our customers’ financial positions, which could lead to decreased sales.

21

We strive to maintain compliance with these and all other applicable laws and regulations. We retain a Manager of Regulatory Compliance and have engaged outside consultants as needed to assist us in meeting and complying with the various state licensure requirements to which we are subject. If we are unable to maintain or achieve compliance with these laws and regulations, however, we could be subject to substantial fines or other restrictions on our ability to provide competitive distribution services, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

We cannot assure you that existing laws and regulations will not be revised or that new, more restrictive laws will not be adopted or become applicable to us or the products that we distribute or dispense. The federal pedigree regulations of the FDA under the PDMA require tracking human labeled prescription products through the entire distribution chain and are enforceable for distributors that do not have a written agreement with the manufacturer granting the wholesale distributor status as an “Authorized Distributor of Record.”  We cannot assure you that the vendors of products that may become subject to more stringent laws will not try to recover any or all increased costs of compliance from us by increasing the prices at which we purchase products from them, or, that we will be able to recover any such increased prices from our customers. We also cannot assure you that our business and financial condition will not be materially and adversely affected by future changes in applicable laws and regulations.

Loss of key management or sales representatives could harm our business.

Our future success depends to a significant extent on the skills, experience and efforts of management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. James F. Cleary, Jr. While we have not experienced problems in the past attracting and maintaining members of our management team, the loss of any or all of these individuals could adversely impact our business. We do not carry key-man life insurance on any member of management. In addition we do not have employment agreements with key members of our senior management team. We must continue to develop and retain a core group of individuals if we are to realize our goal of continued expansion and growth. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in the future.

Also, due to the specialized nature of our products and services, generally only highly qualified and trained sales representatives have the necessary skills to market our products and provide our services. These individuals develop relationships with our customers that could be damaged if these employees are not retained. We face intense competition for the hiring of these professionals, and many professionals in the field that may otherwise be attractive candidates for us to hire may be bound by non-competition agreements with our competitors. Any failure on our part to hire, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified professionals would damage our business. We do not generally enter into agreements that contain non-competition provisions with our employees, other than with members of our senior management team, former owners of acquired companies and certain other employees.

Failure of, or security problems with, our information systems could damage our business.

Our information systems are dependent on third party software, global communications providers, telephone systems and other aspects of technology and Internet infrastructure that are susceptible to failure. Though we have implemented security measures and some redundant systems, our customer satisfaction and our business could be harmed if we or our vendors experience any system delays, failures, loss of data, power outages, computer viruses, break-ins, unauthorized access by competitors or similar disruptions. Although we have safeguards for emergencies, including, without limitation, sophisticated back-up systems, the occurrence of a major catastrophic event or other system failure at any of our distribution facilities could interrupt data processing or result in the loss of stored data. This may result in the loss of customers or a reduction in demand for our services. Only some of our systems are fully redundant and although we do carry business interruption insurance, it may not be sufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur as a result of system failures. If a disruption occurs, our profitability and results of operations may suffer.

22

The outbreak of an infectious disease within either the production animal or companion animal population could have a significant adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

An outbreak of disease affecting animals, such as foot-and-mouth disease, various forms of influenza or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly referred to as “mad cow disease,” could result in the widespread destruction of affected animals and consequently result in a reduction in demand for animal health products. In addition, outbreaks of these or other diseases or concerns of such diseases could create adverse publicity that may have a material adverse effect on consumer demand for meat, dairy and poultry products, and, as a result, on our customers’ demand for the products we distribute. The outbreak of a disease among the companion animal population which could cause a reduction in the demand for companion animals could also adversely affect our business. Although we have not been adversely impacted by the outbreak of a disease in the past, there can be no assurance that a future outbreak of an infectious disease will not have an adverse effect on our business.

Our acquired technology or developed technology may not be successful in gaining new customers or the technology may fail to produce its intended results.

The process of acquiring or developing new technology products and solutions is inherently complex and uncertain. It requires accurate anticipation of customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends. We must make long-term investments and commit significant resources before knowing whether these investments will eventually result in products or services that achieve customer acceptance and generate the revenues required to provide desired returns. If we fail to accurately anticipate and meet our customers’ needs through the development of new products and technologies and service offerings or if we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or if our new products are not widely accepted or if our current or future products fail to meet applicable worldwide regulatory requirements, we could lose market share and customers to our competitors and that could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.  Additionally, if technology investments do not achieve the intended results we may write-off the investments, and we face the risk of claims from system users that the systems failed to produce the intended result and/or that the systems caused negative performance of the customer’s animals or overall operation of the customer’s business.  Any such claims, even those without merit, could be expensive and time consuming to defend, cause us to lose a customer and the associated revenue, divert management’s attention and resources or require us to pay damages.

If third parties claim that we infringe upon their intellectual property rights, our financial results could be adversely affected.

We face the risk of claims that we have infringed third parties’ intellectual property rights, including trademarks, trade names, and patents. Third parties may claim that our proprietary branded products infringe their trademarks and/or trade names; that our consultative services infringe a patented machine, process, or business method; and/or that our products infringe such third parties’ patented animal health products.  We have not conducted an independent review of trademarks or patents issued to third parties. The large number of trademarks and patents, the rapid rate of new trademark and patent issuances, the complexities of the technology involved in patents and uncertainty of litigation increase the risk of business assets and management’s attention being diverted to intellectual property litigation.

Any claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement, even those without merit, could:

• be expensive and time consuming to defend;

• cause us to cease making, licensing or using products or services that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;

• require us to redesign, reengineer, or rebrand our products or packaging, if feasible;

• divert management’s attention and resources; or

• require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use a third party’s intellectual property.

Any royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. A successful claim of infringement against us could result in our being required to pay significant damages, enter into costly license or royalty agreements, or stop the sale of certain products, any of which could have a negative impact on our financial results and harm our future prospects.

23

Our intellectual property rights may be inadequate to protect our business.

We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as licensing agreements and third-party nondisclosure and assignment agreements. Our failure to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights for any reason could have a material adverse effect on our business.

           We rely on our trademarks, trade names, service marks and brand names to distinguish our proprietary branded products and services from the products and services of our competitors, and have registered or applied to register many of these trademarks and servicemarks. We cannot assure you that our trademark and servicemark applications will be approved. Third parties may also oppose our trademark and servicemark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks and servicemarks. In the event that our marks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to rebrand our proprietary branded products and services, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote resources to advertise and market new brands. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our marks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our marks.

         The pursuit and assertion of patent rights involve complex legal and factual determinations and, therefore, are characterized by some uncertainty.  In addition, the laws governing patentability and the scope of patent coverage continue to evolve.  As a result, we cannot assure you patents will be issued from any of our patent applications.  The scope of any of our patents, if issued, may not be sufficiently broad to offer meaningful protection. In addition, our patents, if they are issued, may be successfully challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable so that our patent rights might not create an effective competitive barrier for certain of our niche products. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our patent, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our patent.

We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology. It is possible that others will independently develop the same or similar technology or otherwise obtain access to our unpatented technology. To protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information, we require employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements. We cannot assure you that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information.  Our inability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies for any reason could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If our proprietary branded products infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, we may be required to indemnify our customers for any damages they suffer.

Third parties may assert infringement claims against our customers. These claims may require us to initiate or defend protracted and costly litigation on behalf of our customers, regardless of the merits of these claims. If any of these claims succeed, we may be forced to pay damages on behalf of our customers or may be required to obtain licenses for the products they use. If we cannot obtain all necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, our customers may be forced to stop using our products.

We may be subject to product liability and other claims in the ordinary course of business.

Our business involves a risk of product liability and other claims in the ordinary course of business, for example arising from shipping mislabeled or outdated product, product recalls or disputes among competing vendors. We maintain general liability insurance with policy limits of $1.0 million per incident and $2.0 million in the aggregate, and in many cases we have indemnification rights against such claims from the manufacturers of the products we distribute. We do not maintain a separate product liability insurance policy because we do not currently manufacture the vast majority of the products that we sell. Our ability to recover under insurance or indemnification arrangements is subject to the financial viability of the insurers and manufacturers. We cannot assure you that our insurance coverage or the manufacturers’ indemnity will be available or sufficient in any future cases brought against us.

24

We may not be able to raise needed capital in the future on favorable terms or at all.

We expect that our existing sources of cash, together with any funds generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated capital needs for at least the next twelve months. However, we may require additional capital to finance our growth strategies or other activities in the future. Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the costs associated with our growth and expansion. Additional financing may not be available when needed and, if such financing is available, it may not be available on terms favorable to us. Our failure to raise capital when needed could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.

Any borrowings on the revolving credit facility will be at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk based on market rates. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on any future variable rate indebtedness that we may incur on our revolving credit facility would increase even if the amount borrowed remained the same, and our net income and cash available for servicing our indebtedness would decrease. Our variable rate debt as of September 30, 2012 was $48.1 million (comprised of revolving credit facilities). Our interest expense for fiscal year 2012 was approximately $0.9 million and was approximately $0.7 million for fiscal year 2011. A 1% increase in the average interest rate would not have a material impact on our operations assuming our current level of debt.  However, if we had to borrow additional funds to operate our business, the change in interest rates could affect our operations.   See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Our lenders may have suffered losses related to the weakening economy and may not be able to fund our borrowings.

Our lenders, including the lenders participating in our revolving credit facilities, may have suffered losses related to their lending and other financial relationships, especially because of the general weakening of the national economy and increased financial instability of many borrowers.  As a result, lenders may become insolvent or tighten their lending standards, which could make it more difficult for us to borrow under our revolving credit facility or to obtain other financing on favorable terms or at all.  Our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected if we were unable to draw funds under our revolving credit facility because of a lender default or to obtain other cost-effective financing.

25

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

The table below provides a summary of the Company’s principal facilities as of September 30, 2012:

Location	Total Square Feet	(1)	Own or Lease	Principal Function (5)
Boise, Idaho	62,000		Own	Headquarters and call center
Edwardsville, Kansas	135,000		Lease	Distribution center and pharmacy
Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania	111,000		Lease	Distribution center and pharmacy
Castle Cary, England	84,000		Own	Centaur office, call center and distribution center
Visalia, California	81,000		Lease	Distribution center and veterinary food-animal drug retailer
Denver, Colorado	75,000		Lease	Distribution center and call center
Grand Prairie, Texas	70,000		Lease	Distribution center, call center and pharmacy
Amarillo, Texas	40,000		Own	Distribution center
Atlanta, Georgia	41,000		Lease	Distribution center
Whitestown, Indiana	40,000	(2)	Lease	Distribution center and pharmacy
Nampa, Idaho	36,000		Lease	Distribution center and pharmacy
Fife, Washington	30,000		Lease	Distribution center
Orlando, Florida	30,000	(3)	Lease	Distribution center
Amarillo, Texas	26,000		Lease	Micro office
Clear Lake, Wisconsin	25,000	(4)	Lease	Distribution center and call center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota	23,000	(4)	Own	Distribution center, call center and pharmacy
Glendale, Arizona	20,000		Lease	Distribution center
Sturbridge, Massachusetts	15,000		Lease	Securos office and call center
Holland, Michigan	5,000		Lease	Call center
Omaha, Nebraska	4,000		Lease	Call center
Sioux City, Iowa	3,000		Lease	Call center
(1)  Rounded to the nearest thousand square feet.
(2)  In November 2012, we expanded the space in our Whitestown, Indiana distribution center to 70,000 square feet.
(3)  We have entered into a new lease agreement that will expand the size of our distribution center to 42,000 in January 2013.
(4)  We are in the process of opening a new distribution center in Shakopee, Minnesota with 125,000 square feet, consolidating our operations in Clear Lake, Wisconsin and Sioux Falls, South Dakota.  We expect to complete the opening in December 2012.
(5)  We also operate out of a number of shipping depots in the United States and United Kingdom but maintain little to no inventory at these locations.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

MWI is party to a lawsuit with Harold and Darroll Wotton in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho which was originally removed to federal court by the Wottons on February 7, 2012.   MWI brought suit alleging breach by the Wottons of the Asset Purchase Agreements pursuant to which MWI purchased the Securos business, breach of the respective employment agreements of Harold and Darroll Wotton, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, civil conspiracy, conversion and usurping corporate opportunities.  MWI’s complaint seeks an injunction to enforce the non-competition covenants contained in the Asset Purchase Agreements and employment agreements as well as unspecified money damages.   The Wottons have brought a counterclaim against MWI alleging, among other things, fraud in the inducement when MWI purchased the Securos business from the Wottons in 2007, breach of contract, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, defamation and unfair and deceptive business practices and requested a declaratory judgment regarding the restrictive covenants in Harold Wotton’s and Darroll Wotton’s respective employment agreements.   The counterclaim seeks damages in excess of $12 million.  On September 14, 2012, in response to a motion for preliminary injunction filed by MWI, the Court issued an order enjoining the Wottons as well as their officers, agents, employees, attorneys, and all persons who are in active concert or participation with them from selling any veterinary orthopedic equipment, including (1) one-time consumables like sutures and bandages, (2) non-reusable items like implants and bone screws, or (3) reusable tools such as surgical scissors, scalpel blades or forceps in the United States, Canada, Germany and Dubai.  The Court’s injunction will last until on or about January 23, 2014.  The Wottons have appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and that appeal is pending.

26

MWI is also a party to a legal action brought before the Commercial Court in Antwerp, Belgium that was filed on September 25, 2012 by NV Viyo International (“VIYO”).  VIYO is a manufacturer of nutritional products for cats and dogs.  MWI and VIYO are parties to a Distribution Agreement dated October 22, 2010 (the “Distribution Agreement”).  In the legal action, VIYO has alleged that in acting as a distributor for VIYO that MWI breached the commitments that it had made to VIYO in the Distribution Agreement or otherwise, although VIYO has not specifically articulated which contractual commitment in the Distribution Agreement MWI has violated.  As a result, VIYO is seeking from MWI damages in an amount preliminarily claimed to be $21.9 million.  Of this amount, VIYO alleges that at least $16.8 million is due to their lost profits, notwithstanding that recovery for lost profits is prohibited by the terms of the Distribution Agreement.  MWI has reviewed the matter thoroughly and believes that it has fulfilled its contractual commitments to VIYO.

MWI believes that both the counterclaim in the Wotton matter and VIYO's claims are wholly without merit and intends to continue to vigorously defend against both actions. MWI also believes that the likelihood of MWI incurring material losses in connection with either matter is remote, and therefore has not accrued any amount relating to either matter in the Company’s financial statements. Because the nature of litigation is inherently uncertain, MWI cannot predict the outcome of these matters at this time.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock has been quoted on the Nasdaq under the symbol “MWIV” since August 3, 2005. Prior to that date there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the two most recent fiscal years, the high and low sales prices of our common stock, reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market.

		Common Stock Price
		High		Low
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2011
	First Quarter	$	65.84	$	54.61
	Second Quarter	$	80.86	$	59.95
	Third Quarter	$	86.99	$	76.82
	Fourth Quarter	$	90.24	$	65.31
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012
	First Quarter	$	77.39	$	61.01
	Second Quarter	$	91.38	$	64.08
	Third Quarter	$	103.50	$	84.00
	Fourth Quarter	$	109.99	$	86.09

27

At the close of business on November 16, 2012, we had 12,794,312 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.  As of that date, there were 613 registered holders of record.  This does not reflect beneficial stockholders who hold their stock in nominee or “street” name through brokerage firms.

We have not paid or declared any dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to finance the ongoing operations and growth of our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on conditions at that time, including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.  The information contained under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in Item 12 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

The table below provides information concerning our repurchase of shares of our common stock during the fourth quarter ended September 30, 2012.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
					Total Number of	Maximum Number (or
	Total				Shares Purchased	Approximate Dollar
	Number		Average		as Part of Publicly	Value) of Shares that May
	of Shares		Price Paid		Announced Plans	Yet Be Purchased Under
Period	Purchased		per Share		or Programs	the Plans or Programs
July 1 to July 31, 2012	38	(1)	$	90.30	—	—
August 1 to August 31, 2012	359	(1)	$	92.09	—	—
September 1 to September 30, 2012	11,795	(1)	$	106.44	—	—
Total	12,192		$	105.97	—	—
(1) These shares were withheld upon the vesting of employee stock grants in connection with payment
of required withholding taxes.

28

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on $100 invested at the market close on September 30, 2007 through and including September 30, 2012, the last trading day before the end of our most recently completed fiscal year, with the cumulative total return of the same time period on the same amount invested in the Russell 2000 Index, the Standard and Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index and a Peer Group Index, consisting of 9 companies that compete or operate in a comparable industry as the Company. The chart below the graph sets forth the actual numbers depicted on the graph.

	9/30/2007	9/30/2008	9/30/2009	9/30/2010	9/30/2011	9/30/2012
MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.	$100.00	$104.08	$105.83	$152.90	$180.72	$282.60
S&P SmallCap 600 Index	100.00	85.18	74.97	84.68	83.93	110.53
Russell 2000 Index	100.00	84.37	75.02	83.95	79.98	103.97
Peer Group(1)	100.00	95.67	101.70	107.64	111.85	151.98

(1) Peer Group consists of Abaxis, Inc. (ABAX), Henry Schein Inc. (HSIC), IDEXX Laboratories Inc. (IDXX), Owens & Minor Inc. (OMI), Patterson Companies Inc. (PDCO), PetMed Express Inc. (PETS), PSS World Medical Inc. (PSSI), Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) and VCA Antech Inc. (WOOF).

29

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The selected consolidated financial data below represent portions of our financial statements and are not complete. You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to these statements included in this annual report. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

			Year Ended September 30,
			2012		2011		2010		2009		2008
				(In  thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
	Product sales		$	1,996,294	$	1,489,500	$	1,169,545	$	880,703	$	778,953
	Product sales to related party			61,873		55,185		43,017		46,406		39,452
	Commissions			16,979		20,655		16,780		14,223		12,959
		Total revenues		2,075,146		1,565,340		1,229,342		941,332		831,364
Cost of product sales				1,808,230		1,359,755		1,064,339		806,677		711,812
	Gross profit			266,916		205,585		165,003		134,655		119,552
Selling, general and administrative expenses				172,104		130,656		105,793		90,827		84,123
Depreciation and amortization				9,045		6,263		4,992		3,365		3,078
	Operating income			85,767		68,666		54,218		40,463		32,351
Other income (expense):
	Interest expense			(926)		(741)		(539)		(242)		(265)
	Earnings of equity method investees			318		268		220		230		179
	Other			781		507		427		540		642
		Total other income (expense)		173		34		108		528		556
Income before taxes				85,940		68,700		54,326		40,991		32,907
Income tax expense				(32,463)		(26,120)		(20,886)		(16,086)		(12,990)
Net income			$	53,477	$	42,580	$	33,440	$	24,905	$	19,917
Earnings per common share:
	Basic		$	4.24	$	3.42	$	2.73	$	2.06	$	1.65
	Diluted		$	4.23	$	3.40	$	2.70	$	2.02	$	1.62
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
	Basic			12,616		12,464		12,241		12,088		12,053
	Diluted			12,647		12,513		12,395		12,306		12,301

	As of September 30,
	2012		2011		2010		2009		2008
		(In thousands)
Cash	$	514	$	606	$	911	$	14,302	$	3,419
Total assets		696,383		504,219		467,932		337,919		314,805
Total debt		48,522		4,170		14,724		97		194
Total stockholders’ equity		359,302		292,810		246,787		207,927		181,003

30

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

All dollar and sterling pound amounts are presented in thousands, except for per share amounts.

Overview

We are a leading distributor of animal health products to veterinarians in the United States and the United Kingdom. We sell our products to veterinarians in both the companion and production animal markets. Our growth has primarily been from internal growth initiatives and, to a lesser extent, selective acquisitions.

As a result of the acquisition of Micro, we estimate that in the United States approximately 57% of our total revenues have been generated from sales to the companion animal market and 43% from sales to the production animal market.  Including the gross billings from agency commissions which are excluded from our total revenues in order to comply with generally accepted accounting principles, we estimate that in the United States approximately 63% of our total revenues have been generated from sales to the companion animal market and 37% from sales to the production animal market.  We estimate that approximately two-thirds of our total revenues have been generated from sales to the companion animal market and one-third from sales to the production animal market in the United Kingdom. The state of the overall economy in both the United States and United Kingdom and consumer spending have impacted both the companion animal and production animal markets, with tightening credit markets, volatile commodity prices in milk, grain, corn and feeder cattle, and changes in weather patterns (e.g. droughts or seasons of higher precipitation) also affecting demand in the production animal market.  Both the companion animal and production animal markets have been integral to our financial results and we intend to continue supporting both markets.

We believe that the companion animal market in both the United States and United Kingdom has slowed as a result of a decrease in consumer spending but has shown signs of a recovery in 2012.  Historically, growth in the companion animal market has been due to the increasing number of households with companion animals, increased expenditures on animal health and preventative care, an aging pet population, advancements in pharmaceuticals and diagnostic testing and extensive marketing programs sponsored by companion animal nutrition and pharmaceutical companies. While the average order size for companion animal health products is often smaller than production animal health products, companion animal health products typically have higher margins. We intend to continue to penetrate this market through internal growth initiatives and selective acquisitions.  We believe that some of our customers in this market have experienced liquidity issues as a result of the tightening credit markets.

Product sales in the production animal market in both the United States and United Kingdom are impacted by volatility in commodity prices such as milk, corn, grain and feeder cattle, changes in weather patterns (e.g. droughts or seasons of higher precipitation that determine how long cattle will graze and consequently the number of days an animal is on feed during a finishing phase) or a change in the general economy, which can shift the number of animals treated, the timing of when animals are treated, to what extent they are treated and which products they are treated with.  This could also create cash-flow challenges for these customers and in turn, could impact the time it takes for us to collect our outstanding accounts receivable from these customers as well as affect the overall collectability of these accounts.  However, we still believe that it is important to our business to service this market and we intend to continue to support production animal veterinarians with a broad range of products and value-added services. Historically, sales in this market have been largely driven by spending on animal health products to improve productivity, weight gain and disease prevention, as well as a growing focus on food safety.

 We generally extend some level of credit to our customers without requiring collateral, which exposes us to credit risk.  If customers’ cash flow or operating and financial performance deteriorates, or if they are unable to make scheduled payments or obtain other sources of credit, they may not be able to pay or may delay payment to us, or in some cases may return products to us.We continually assess our customers’ ability to pay us and adjust our allowance for doubtful accounts, as necessary.

31

We sell products that we source from our vendors to our customers through either a “buy/sell” transaction or an agency relationship with our vendors. In a “buy/sell” transaction, we purchase or take inventory of products from our vendors. When a customer places an order with us, we pick, pack, ship and invoice the customer for the order. We record sales from “buy/sell” transactions, which account for the vast majority of our business, as revenues in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. In an agency relationship, we generally do not purchase and take inventory of products from our vendors. When we receive an order from our customer, we transmit the order to our vendor, who picks, packs and ships the order to our customer. In some cases, our vendor invoices and collects payment from our customer, while in other cases we invoice and collect payment from our customer on behalf of our vendor. We receive a commission payment for soliciting the order from our customer and for providing other customer service activities. The aggregate revenues we receive in agency transactions constitute the “commissions” line item on our consolidated statements of income and are recorded in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our vendors determine the method we use to sell our products. Historically, vendors have occasionally switched between the “buy/sell” and agency models for particular products in response to market conditions related to that particular product. A switch between models can impact our revenues and our operating income. We cannot know in advance when a vendor will switch between the “buy/sell” and agency models or what impact, if any, such a change may have. A switch can occur even with vendors with whom we have written agreements, because most of our agreements with vendors have relatively short terms and are terminable with or without cause on short notice, normally 30 to 90 days. The impact of any individual change from a “buy/sell” to an agency model depends on the costs and expenses associated with a particular product, and can have either a positive or a negative effect on our profitability.

We typically renegotiate vendor contracts annually.  These vendor contracts may include terms defining margins, rebates, commissions, exclusivity requirements and the manner in which we go to market.  For example, vendors could require us to distribute their products on an exclusive basis, which could cause us to forego distributing competing products which may also be profitable.  Conversely, competitors could obtain exclusive rights to market particular products, which we would be unable to market.  If we lose the right to distribute products under such exclusive agreements, we may lose access to certain products and lose a competitive advantage.  Exclusivity agreements could allow potential competitors to sell products that we cannot offer and erode our market share.  In addition, vendors have the ability to expand the distributors that they use which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Some of our current and future vendors may decide to compete with us in the future by pursuing or increasing their efforts in direct marketing and sales of their products. These vendors could sell their products at lower prices and maintain a higher gross margin on their product sales than we can. In this event, veterinarians or animal owners may elect to purchase animal health products directly from these vendors.  As an example of this type of event, we were a sales agent for a pet food line for most of fiscal year 2011 that we did not represent in fiscal year 2012 because that manufacturer chose to sell their products direct and not through sales agents.

Many of our vendors’ rebate programs are based on a calendar year.  Historically, the three months ended December 31 has been our most significant quarter for recognition of rebates.  Vendor rebates based on sales are classified in our accompanying consolidated statements of income as a reduction to cost of product sales at the time the sales performance measures are achieved. Purchase rebates are measured against inventory purchases from the vendors and are a reduction of inventory until the product is sold. When the inventory is sold, purchase rebates are recognized as a reduction to cost of product sales.

Total Revenues. Our total revenues increased from $831,364 for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 to $2,075,146 for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. Our revenue growth has been driven primarily from internal growth and, to a lesser extent, selective acquisitions and our ability to offer a broad product selection at competitive prices with high levels of customer service and support and an expansion in the number of veterinary practices to which we distribute products. We have continually added new vendor relationships to expand our product offering and field sales representatives to increase our customer reach, principally in the Southeast, Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States.

Operating Expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased from $84,123 for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 to $172,104 for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist mainly of compensation and benefits, warehouse operating supplies, occupancy and location expenses and other general corporate expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 10.1% for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, compared to 8.3% for the same period in 2012.

32

Acquisitions. In February 2010, we acquired all of the share capital of Centaur.  Based in Castle Cary, England, Centaur is a distributor of animal health products to veterinarians in the United Kingdom.

In March 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Nelson.  Nelson was a distributor of animal health products to over 1,100 veterinary practices, primarily in the Midwestern United States.  This acquisition allows us to better serve our customers in this region of the United States. 

On October 31, 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Micro.  Micro is a value-added distributor to the production animal market, including the distribution of micro feed ingredients, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, parasiticides, supplies and other animal health products.  Micro also is a leading innovator of proprietary, computerized management systems for the production animal market.

The assets acquired and the certain liabilities assumed relate to (a) the development and implementation of proprietary computerized systems for feed, health, information and production animal management which include individual animal identification and management, food safety assurance, trace back and process verification systems, (b) ongoing research and development of such systems, and (c) the distribution and sale of micro feed ingredients, animal health products and dairy sanitation solutions.

Fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of these acquisitions are discussed in Note 3 “Business Acquisitions” to the consolidated financial statements.

33

Results of Operations

The following tables summarize our historical results of operations for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

			Year Ended September 30,
				2012	%		2011	%		2010	%
				(In  thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
	Product sales		$	1,996,294	96.2%	$	1,489,500	95.2%	$	1,169,545	95.1%
	Product sales to related party			61,873	3.0%		55,185	3.5%		43,017	3.5%
	Commissions			16,979	0.8%		20,655	1.3%		16,780	1.4%
		Total revenues		2,075,146	100.0%		1,565,340	100.0%		1,229,342	100.0%
Cost of product sales				1,808,230	87.1%		1,359,755	86.9%		1,064,339	86.6%
Gross profit				266,916	12.9%		205,585	13.1%		165,003	13.4%
Selling, general and administrative expenses				172,104	8.3%		130,656	8.3%		105,793	8.6%
Depreciation and amortization				9,045	0.4%		6,263	0.4%		4,992	0.4%
Operating income				85,767	4.2%		68,666	4.4%		54,218	4.4%
Other income (expense):
	Interest expense			(926)	0.0%		(741)	0.0%		(539)	0.0%
	Earnings of equity method investees			318	0.0%		268	0.0%		220	0.0%
	Other			781	0.0%		507	0.0%		427	0.0%
		Total other income (expense)		173	0.0%		34	0.0%		108	0.0%
Income before taxes				85,940	4.2%		68,700	4.4%		54,326	4.4%
Income tax expense				(32,463)	-1.6%		(26,120)	-1.7%		(20,886)	-1.7%
Net income			$	53,477	2.6%	$	42,580	2.7%	$	33,440	2.7%
Earnings per common share:
	Basic		$	4.24		$	3.42		$	2.73
	Diluted		$	4.23		$	3.40		$	2.70
Weighted average common shares
	outstanding:
	Basic			12,616			12,464			12,241
	Diluted			12,647			12,513			12,395

Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011

Total Revenues. Total revenues increased $509,806, or 32.6%, to $2,075,146 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 from $1,565,340 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of Micro, revenue growth in the United States was 17.3% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.  Revenues from the acquisition of Micro, which was acquired on October 31, 2011, were $246.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.  Revenue growth in the United Kingdom was 14.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, consisting of 16.8% organic growth and a decline of 2.1% related to foreign currency exchange.  Excluding the impact of Micro, the growth in revenues in the United States came primarily from increased business as a result of the growth from our e-commerce platform, the addition of new flea, tick and heartworm products, the addition of sales representatives over the past twelve months and the acquisition of Nelson. Excluding the impact of Micro, revenues in the United States attributable to new customers represented approximately 36% of the growth in total revenues during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. Excluding the impact of Micro, revenues in the United States attributable to existing customers represented approximately 64% of the growth in total revenues during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. For the purpose of calculating growth rates of new and existing customer revenue, we have defined a new customer as a customer that did not purchase product from us in the corresponding fiscal quarter of the prior year, with the remaining customer base being considered an existing customer.  Revenues from new customers for each fiscal quarter are summed to arrive at the estimated year-to-date revenue for new customers.

34

Commission revenues decreased $3,676, or 17.8%, to $16,979 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 from $20,655 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.  The decrease of commission revenues was due to the loss of a pet food line that we represented for most of fiscal year 2011 that we did not represent in fiscal year 2012 and a shift in commissions to buy-sell revenues for certain parasiticides.  Gross agency billings decreased by $38,681, or 10.4%, to $332,343 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 from $371,024 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.  Additionally, the decrease in commissions was due to an incentive that we earned from one of our vendors during fiscal year 2011 that was earned at a substantially lower level in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $61,331, or 29.8%, to $266,916 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 from $205,585 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The change in gross profit is primarily a result of increased total revenues as discussed above.  Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues was 12.9% and 13.1% for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues decreased due to the reduction in commissions, lower product margins and lower vendor rebates as a percentage of revenues, partially offset by improved freight as a percentage of total revenues.  Vendor rebates increased by $1,330 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.  This increase in vendor rebates was primarily due to revenue growth achieved during the fiscal year.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”). SG&A increased $41,448, or 31.7%, to $172,104 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 from $130,656 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. SG&A as a percentage of revenue was 8.3% for the each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.  The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to the addition of Micro and the added support for our revenue growth.  Additionally, stock based compensation expense increased $2,182, of which $1,278 was related to accelerated vesting on restricted stock awards granted during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that did not occur in the same period of the prior fiscal year.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2,782, or 44.4%, to $9,045 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 from $6,263 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the increase in fixed assets and intangibles as a result of the acquisition of Micro.

Fiscal 2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010

Total Revenues. Total revenues increased $335,998, or 27.3%, to $1,565,340 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 from $1,229,342 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Revenue growth in the United States was 21.5% as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.  Revenue growth in the United Kingdom was 68.0% as we owned Centaur for the full fiscal year compared to approximately eight months in the same period in the prior fiscal year.  The growth in organic revenues in the United States came primarily from increased business as a result of the bankruptcy and liquidation of a competitor that is no longer in business, growth from our e-commerce platform, the addition of new flea, tick and heartworm products, the acquisition of Nelson and the addition of sales representatives over the past twelve months. Organic revenues in the United States attributable to new customers represented approximately 53% of the growth in total revenues during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. Organic revenues in the United States attributable to existing customers represented approximately 47% of the growth in total revenues during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.

Commission revenues increased $3,875, or 23.1%, to $20,655 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 from $16,780 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.  The increase of commission revenues was due to the increase in gross agency billings of $42,971, or 13.1%, to $371,024 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 from $328,053 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.  Additionally, the growth in commissions included the achievement of an incentive from one of our vendors during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, which was not achieved in fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.

35

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $40,582, or 24.6%, to $205,585 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 from $165,003 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The change in gross profit is primarily a result of increased total revenues as discussed above including the additional gross profit from Centaur for the full fiscal year as compared to approximately eight months in the prior fiscal year.  Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues was 13.1% and 13.4% for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues decreased partially due to the addition of Centaur as well as a slight decrease in the gross margin in the United States.  The gross margin is impacted by the addition of Centaur because Centaur's gross profit as a percentage of total revenues is generally lower than MWI's, which serves to reduce the overall gross margin of the consolidated Company when compared to our results for the same period in the prior year.  Vendor rebates increased by $2,362 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.  This increase in vendor rebates was primarily due to revenue growth achieved during the fiscal year.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”). SG&A increased $24,863, or 23.5%, to $130,656 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 from $105,793 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the addition of Centaur’s operating expenses for the full fiscal year compared to approximately eight months in the prior fiscal year, increased compensation and benefits costs and increased bank service fees.  Also included in the increase in SG&A expenses are the direct acquisition-related expenses of $861 incurred in connection with acquisitions.  SG&A as a percentage of revenue was 8.3% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 and 8.6% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.  SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased due, in part, to the addition of Centaur because Centaur’s SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenues are generally lower than MWI’s, which serves to reduce the overall SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenues when compared to our results for the same period in the prior year.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1,271, or 25.5%, to $6,263 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 from $4,992 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Centaur plus capital expenditures during the year including an office building purchased in Boise, Idaho for our headquarters, equipment for our new distribution center in Visalia, California and other distribution center technology.

Income Tax Expense. Our effective tax rate was 38.0% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 and 38.4% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.  This decrease was primarily due to the impact of the Centaur acquisition that contributed additional earnings at a lower effective tax rate.  Additionally, there was a lower international enacted tax rate change during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

Seasonality in Operating Results

Our quarterly sales and operating results have varied significantly in the past, and will likely continue to do so in the future. Historically, our total revenues have typically been higher during the spring and fall months due to increased sales of production animal products. The sales of production animal products can vary due to changes in commodity prices and weather patterns (e.g. droughts or seasons of higher precipitation that determine how long cattle will graze and consequently the number of days an animal is on feed during a finishing phase) which may also affect seasonality.  Product use cycles for production animal products are directly related to medical procedures performed by veterinarians on production animals during the spring and fall months. These buying patterns can also be affected by vendors’ and distributors’ marketing programs or price increase announcements, which can cause veterinarians to purchase production animal health products earlier than those products are needed. This kind of early purchasing may reduce our sales in the months these purchases would have otherwise been made. See “Risk Factors — Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly, and these fluctuations may cause our stock price to fall.” Additionally, while we accrue rebates as they are earned, our rebates have historically been highest during the quarter ended December 31, since some of our vendors’ rebate programs were designed to include targets to be achieved near the end of the calendar year.  This trend has slowed some in recent years due to certain changes in vendor contracts but it still remains our largest quarter for vendor rebates.

Our companion animal products tend to have a different product use cycle that minimally overlaps with that of production animal products. In the companion animal market, sales of flea, tick and mosquito products are highest during the spring and summer months. The differing product use cycles of companion animal products partially offsets the seasonality we typically experience due to our sales of production animal products.

36

For the reasons and factors discussed above our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly. Accordingly, results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year and our sales for any particular future period may decrease. In the future, operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. If this occurs, the price of our stock would likely decrease.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations and borrowings on our credit facilities. We use capital primarily to fund day-to-day operations and to maintain sufficient inventory levels in order to promptly fulfill customer orders and to expand our operations and sales growth. We believe our capital resources, including our ability to borrow funds from our credit facilities, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next twelve months.

We generally extend some level of credit to our customers without requiring collateral, which exposes us to credit risk. If customers’ cash flow or operating and financial performance deteriorates, or if they are unable to make scheduled payments or obtain other sources of credit, they may not be able to pay or may delay payment to us, or in some cases may return products to us. Any inability of current and/or potential customers to pay us for our products and/or services due to their deteriorating financial condition or otherwise may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Volatility in commodity prices, such as milk, corn, grain and feeder cattle, and deteriorating economic conditions can have a significant impact on the financial results of our customers. We continually assess our customers’ ability to pay us and adjust our allowance for doubtful accounts, as necessary.

Capital Resources.  On November 1, 2011, MWI Veterinary Supply Co. (“MWI Co”) as borrower, entered into a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”, or “revolving credit facility”) with MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Memorial Pet Care, Inc., as guarantors, and Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as lenders (collectively, the “Lenders”), amending the Credit Agreement dated December 13, 2006, and as amended from time to time, by and among MWI Co., MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., Memorial Pet Care, Inc. and the Lenders (the  “Credit Agreement”).  The Third Amendment allows for an aggregate revolving commitment of the Lenders under the Credit Agreement of $150,000 and a maturity date of November 1, 2016.  Under the Third Amendment, the margin on variable interest rate borrowings ranges from 0.95% to 1.50%.  The commitment fee under the Third Amendment ranges from 0.15% to 0.25% depending on the funded debt to EBITDA ratio.  The variable interest rate is equal to the Daily LIBOR Floating Rate or the LIBOR 1-month, 2-month, 3-month or 6-month fixed rate (at MWI Co.’s option) plus the margin.  The facility contains financial covenants, including a fixed charge ratio and a funded debt to EBITDA calculation.  We were in compliance with all of the covenants as of September 30, 2012 and 2011.  Our outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility at September 30, 2012 was $39,500, and the interest rate was 1.10% as of September 30, 2012.

On November 5, 2010, Centaur entered into a £12,500 unsecured revolving line of credit facility (the “sterling revolving credit facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. London Branch (“Wells Fargo”).  The sterling revolving credit facility is for a three year term with interest paid at the end of the applicable 1-month, 2-month or 3-month interest period.  Interest is based on LIBOR for the applicable interest period plus an applicable margin of 1.05% to 1.90%.  The facility contains financial covenants requiring Centaur to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of £3,000.  As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, Centaur was in compliance with the covenant. Our outstanding balance on the sterling revolving credit facility at September 30, 2012 was £5,308, or $8,580 using the exchange rate on September 30, 2012.  The interest rate for the sterling revolving credit facility was 1.57% as of September 30, 2012.

Operating Activities. For fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, cash provided by operating activities was $14,238, and was primarily attributable to net income of $53,477 and an increase in accounts payable of 50,018.  This amount was partially offset by an increase in receivables of $48,879 and an increase in inventories of $52,831.  The increase in net income is a result of the factors discussed above in “Results of Operations.”  The increase in receivables was primarily due to the revenue growth during the fiscal year.  The increases in inventories and accounts payable were primarily due to strategic inventory purchases  made during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 to accommodate our revenue growth and the redistribution of products from our distribution center in Kansas City to the rest of our distribution centers.

37

For fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, cash provided by operating activities was $32,428, and was primarily attributable to net income of $42,580 and a decrease in inventory of $8,553.  This amount was partially offset by an increase in receivables of $23,021 and a decrease in accounts payable of $5,150.  The increase in net income is a result of the factors discussed above in “Results of Operations.”  The increase in receivables was primarily due to the revenue growth during the fiscal year.  The decreases in inventories and accounts payable were primarily due to the a decrease during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 to a more normalized level after we had made large purchases near the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 to accommodate the additional orders from new customers when their primary supplier was no longer able to meet their needs.

For fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, cash provided by operating activities was $16,866, and was primarily attributable to net income of $33,440 and an increase in accounts payable of $39,781.  This amount was partially offset by an increase in receivables of $14,154 and an increase in inventory of $41,106.  The increase in net income is a result of the factors discussed above in “Results of Operations.”  The increase in receivables was primarily due to the addition of the Centaur balances from the acquisition.  The increases in inventories and accounts payable were primarily due to the inventory purchased during the quarter to accommodate the growth from our customers who placed additional orders with us when their primary supplier was no longer able to meet their needs.

Investing Activities.For fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, net cash used in investing activities was $59,865.  We paid $51,718 for the acquisition of Micro, which closed on October 31, 2011.  We paid for capital expenditures of $7,597 which primarily related to information technology and our new distribution center in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

For fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, net cash used in investing activities was $25,509.  We paid $7,000 for the acquisition of Nelson.  We paid for capital expenditures of $12,516 which primarily related to an office building purchased in Boise, Idaho for our headquarters, equipment for our new distribution centers in Visalia, California and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania to accommodate the growth needs in those regions and other distribution center technology.  Additionally, we made an investment in Cubex LLC, a technology based inventory management business, of $4,000.

For fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, net cash used in investing activities was $44,090.  Significant transactions impacting cash used in investing activities include the acquisition of Centaur of $39,645, capital expenditures of $4,388 primarily related to the equipment purchased in preparation for the move to a larger distribution center in Visalia, California as well as other facility and technology infrastructure improvements.

Financing Activities.  For fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, net cash provided by financing activities was $45,399, and was primarily attributable to the net borrowings on our credit facilities of $44,885.  Our revolving credit facilities are used to fund strategic acquisitions, make capital purchases and meet our working capital requirements.

For fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, net cash used in financing activities was $7,291, and was primarily attributable to the net payments on our credit facilities of $7,188.  Our revolving credit facilities are used to fund strategic acquisitions, make capital purchases and meet our working capital requirements.  Additionally, we paid $3,327 in debt payments for the note payable related to the Centaur acquisition, the term note for Centaur and capital lease obligations.  This was largely offset by the excess tax benefit of exercise of common stock options of $2,714.

For fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities was $13,785, and was primarily attributable to the net borrowings on our credit facilities of $10,116 and the tax benefit of $3,611 from the exercise of common stock options.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements. At September 30, 2012, we had no significant investments that were accounted for under the equity method in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States except for Feeders Advantage. Feeders Advantage has no liabilities associated with it that were guaranteed by or that would be considered material to us. Accordingly, we do not have any off balance sheet arrangements.

38

Contractual Obligations

Contractual Obligations. Our contractual obligations at September 30, 2012 mature as follows (in thousands):

	Payments Due by Period
	Total	1 Year or less		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Revolving credit facilities(1)	$48,080		$         —		$8,580		$39,500		$         —
Operating lease commitments	35,245		4,663		8,033		7,437		15,112
Capital lease commitments	441		337		104		—		—
Interest on revolving credit facilities(2)	2,597		735		1,212		650		—
Other long-term obligations(3)	18,285		15,601		739		46		1,899
Total contractual obligations	$104,648		$  21,336		$18,668		$47,633		$ 17,011

 (1) For the purposes of the Contractual Obligations table above the revolving credit facilities is assumed to be paid at the respective credit facility’s termination date.  For financial statement purposes the revolving credit facilities are classified as a current liability.

(2) For debt instruments with variable interest rates and unused commitment fees, interest has been calculated for all future periods using the rates in effect at September 30, 2012.

(3) Other long-term obligations include contracts primarily related to inventory purchase commitments of $15,000, information technology services and telecommunications.  Also included is the pension liability of $1,899 which was assumed to be paid out beyond year five.

Guarantees. We provide guarantees, indemnifications and assurances to others in the ordinary course of our business. We have evaluated our agreements that contain guarantees and indemnification clauses in accordance with the guidance of financial accounting rules.

We enter into a wide range of indemnification arrangements in the ordinary course of business. These include tort indemnities, tax indemnities, indemnities against third party claims arising out of arrangements to provide services to us, indemnities in merger and acquisition agreements and indemnities in agreements related to the sale of our securities. Also, our governance documents and the governance documents of all of our subsidiaries provide for the indemnification of individuals made party to any suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that the individual was acting as an officer, director or agent of the relevant company or as a fiduciary of a company-sponsored welfare benefit plan. We also provide guarantees and indemnifications for the benefit of our wholly-owned subsidiaries for the satisfaction of performance obligations, including certain lease obligations. We are not aware of any material liabilities arising from these indemnification arrangements.

Inflation

Most of our operating expenses are inflation-sensitive, with inflation generally producing increased costs of operations.  During the past three years, the most significant effects of inflation have been on employee wages, costs of products and fuel-intensive costs including freight, packing supplies and travel.  We manage the effects of inflation by controlling increases in compensation expense, renegotiating freight carrier contracts and utilizing a central source for warehouse shipping supplies.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to sales returns, allowance for doubtful accounts, customer incentives, vendor rebates, inventories, goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization, employee benefits and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions and factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We, based on our ongoing review, will make adjustments to our judgments and estimates where facts and circumstances dictate. Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those determined using the estimates described above.

39

We believe the following critical accounting policies are important to understand our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Revenue Recognition

We sell products that we source from vendors to our customers through either a “buy/sell” transaction or an agency relationship with our vendors. In a “buy/sell” transaction, we purchase and take inventory of products from the vendor. When a customer places an order with us, we pick, pack, ship and invoice the customer for the order. We recognize revenue from “buy/sell” transactions as product sales when the product is delivered to the customer. We accept product returns from our customers. We estimate sales returns based on historical experience, and returns are recognized as a reduction of product sales. Product returns have not been significant to our financial statements. In an agency relationship, we generally do not purchase and take inventory of products from our vendors. We receive an order from a customer, then transmit the order to the vendor, who picks, packs and ships the order to the customer. In some cases, the vendor invoices and collects payment from the customer, while in other cases we invoice and collect payment from the customer on behalf of the vendor. We receive a commission payment for soliciting the order from the customer and for providing other customer service activities. Commissions are recognized when the services upon which the commissions are based are complete.

Vendor Rebates

Vendor rebates are recorded based on the terms of the contracts with each vendor. We may receive quarterly, semi-annual and annual performance-based rebates from third-party vendors based upon attainment of certain sales and/or purchase goals. Sales rebates are classified in our accompanying consolidated statements of income as a reduction to cost of product sales at the time the sales performance measures are achieved. Purchase rebates are measured against inventory purchases from the vendors and are a reduction of inventory until the product is sold. When the inventory is sold, purchase rebates are recognized as a reduction to cost of product sales.

Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those determined using the estimates described above. We expect that our estimates in the future will continue to be reasonable as our rebates are based on specific vendor program goals and are principally recorded upon achievement of sales or purchase performance measures. Vendors may change or eliminate rebate programs from year to year.

Customer Incentives

Customer incentives are accrued based on the terms of the contracts with each customer. These incentive programs provide that the customer receives an incentive based on their product purchases or attainment of performance goals. Incentives are estimated based on the specific terms in each agreement, historical experience and product growth rates.  The incentives are recognized as a reduction of product sales.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

We assess the potential impairment of goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets annually and on an interim basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that we consider important and may trigger an interim impairment review include:

· significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;

· significant changes in the manner of our use of acquired assets or the strategy of our overall business; and

· significant negative industry or economic trends.

If we determine through the impairment review process that goodwill or non-amortizing intangible assets are impaired, an impairment charge is recognized in our consolidated statement of income.

Goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets were evaluated for impairment in our fourth quarter of 2012 and we determined that the recorded amount was not impaired. The fair value calculations used for these tests require us to make assumptions about items that are inherently uncertain. Assumptions related to future market demand, market prices and product costs could vary from actual results, and the impact of such variations could be material. Factors that could affect the assumptions include changes in economic conditions, changes in government regulations, success in marketing products and competitive conditions in our industry. The factors that most significantly affect the fair value calculation are market multiples and estimates of future cash flows. Fair value was determined using the discounted cash flow method.

40

Recently Issued and New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income in an entity's financial statements. The guidance requires that comprehensive income be presented either in one continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements presenting the components of net income and its total, the components of other comprehensive income and its total, and total comprehensive income. The guidance also requires that reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income be presented in both the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income. The guidance is effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012.  We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment (“ASU 2011-08”) permitting the assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether events and circumstances lead to the conclusion that it is necessary to perform the traditional two-step impairment test. Under ASU 2011-08, entities testing goodwill for impairment now have the option to perform a qualitative assessment before having to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit. If an entity determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more-likely-than-not less than the carrying amount, the existing two-step quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. This update is effective for us on October 1, 2012. We do not believe that the adoption of this provision will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates, in particular, the Daily LIBOR Floating Rate, and foreign currency translation risk. We do not engage in financial transactions for trading or speculative purposes.  We do not hedge the translation of foreign currency profits into U.S. dollars.  We continually evaluate our foreign currency exchange rate risk and the different options available for managing such risk.

We are exposed to foreign currency risk due to our U.K. subsidiary Centaur.  A hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to the British Pound, which is the Company’s most significant foreign currency exposure, would have changed fiscal 2012 net sales by approximately $30,000. This amount is not indicative of the hypothetical net earnings impact due to the partially offsetting impact of the currency exchange movements on cost of sales and operating expenses.

The interest payable on our revolving credit facilities is based on variable interest rates and is affected by changes in market interest rates. The outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility in the United States as of September 30, 2012 was $39,500.  The outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility in the United Kingdom as of September 30, 2012 was $8,580   If there had been a combined balance on the revolving credit facilities of $170,000, which is the approximate maximum available amount on the facilities based on the foreign currency rates as of September 30, 2012, a change of 10% from the interest rates as of September 30, 2012 would have changed interest by $197 for fiscal year 2012.

41

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

	Page Number
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	43
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010	44
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2012 and 2011	45
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010	46
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010	47
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	48

42

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.

Boise, Idaho

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2012.  Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)2.  These consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also, in our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 27, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boise, Idaho

November 27, 2012

43

MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010
Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts
			2012		2011		2010
Revenues:
	Product sales		$	1,996,294	$	1,489,500	$	1,169,545
	Product sales to related party			61,873		55,185		43,017
	Commissions			16,979		20,655		16,780
		Total revenues		2,075,146		1,565,340		1,229,342
Cost of product sales				1,808,230		1,359,755		1,064,339
Gross profit				266,916		205,585		165,003
Selling, general and administrative expenses				172,104		130,656		105,793
Depreciation and amortization				9,045		6,263		4,992
Operating income				85,767		68,666		54,218
Other income (expense):
	Interest expense			(926)		(741)		(539)
	Earnings of equity method investees			318		268		220
	Other			781		507		427
		Total other income (expense), net		173		34		108
Income before taxes				85,940		68,700		54,326
Income tax expense				(32,463)		(26,120)		(20,886)
Net income			$	53,477	$	42,580	$	33,440
Earnings per common share:
	Basic		$	4.24	$	3.42	$	2.73
	Diluted		$	4.23	$	3.40	$	2.70
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
	Basic			12,616		12,464		12,241
	Diluted			12,647		12,513		12,395
See notes to consolidated financial statements

44

MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2012 and 2011
Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts
				2012		2011
Assets
Current Assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	514	$	606
	Receivables, net			288,922		215,861
	Inventories			251,375		170,065
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			10,094		10,079
	Deferred income taxes			1,580		1,672
		Total current assets		552,485		398,283
Property and equipment, net				35,784		25,209
Goodwill				61,841		49,041
Intangibles, net				38,706		24,894
Other assets, net				7,567		6,792
Total assets			$	696,383	$	504,219
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities:
	Credit facilities		$	48,080	$	2,907
	Accounts payable			258,741		182,594
	Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			19,952		16,385
	Current portion of capital lease obligations			337		909
		Total current liabilities		327,110		202,795
Deferred income taxes				7,180		5,989
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations				104		354
Other long-term liabilities				2,687		2,271
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 12)
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock $0.01 par value, 40,000 authorized; 12,792 and
	12,618 shares issued and outstanding, respectively			128		126
Additional paid in capital				144,667		133,759
Retained earnings				212,965		159,488
Accumulated other comprehensive income				1,542		(563)
	Total stockholders’ equity			359,302		292,810
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity			$	696,383	$	504,219
See notes to consolidated financial statements

45

MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Years Ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010
Dollars and shares in thousands
		Shares of			Additional		Accum.
		Common	Common		Paid In		Other Comp.		Retained
		Stock	Stock		Capital		Inc/(Loss)		Earnings		Total
Balance at October 1, 2009		12,196	$	122	$	124,337	$	—	$	83,468	$	207,927
Net income		—		—		—		—		33,440		33,440
Issuance of common stock		6		—		248		—		—		248
Exercises of common stock options		199		2		401		—		—		403
Tax benefit of common stock exercises		—		—		3,611		—		—		3,611
Issuance of stock awards, net of forfeitures		56		1		1,078		—		—		1,079
Foreign currency translation		—		—		—		536		—		536
Other		—		—		—		(457)		—		(457)
Balance at September 30, 2010		12,457		125		129,675		79		116,908		246,787
Net income		—		—		—		—		42,580		42,580
Issuance of common stock		6		—		412		—		—		412
Exercises of common stock options		102		1		97		—		—		98
Tax benefit of common stock exercises		—		—		2,714		—		—		2,714
Issuance of stock awards, net of forfeitures		53		—		861		—		—		861
Foreign currency translation		—		—		—		(663)		—		(663)
Other		—		—		—		21		—		21
Balance at September 30, 2011		12,618		126		133,759		(563)		159,488		292,810
Net income		—		—		—		—		53,477		53,477
Issuance of common stock		7		—		562		—		—		562
Issuance of common stock for purchase
	of Micro	94		1		7,158						7,159
Exercises of common stock options		15		—		154		—		—		154
Tax benefit of common stock exercises		—		—		895		—		—		895
Issuance of stock awards, net of forfeitures		58		1		2,139		—		—		2,140
Foreign currency translation		—		—		—		1,877		—		1,877
Other		—		—		—		228		—		228
Balance at September 30, 2012		12,792	$	128	$	144,667	$	1,542	$	212,965	$	359,302
	See notes to consolidated financial statements

46

MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010
Dollars in thousands
					2012		2011		2010
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
	Net income				$	53,477	$	42,580	$	33,440
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
	activities:
		Depreciation and amortization				9,062		6,284		5,004
		Amortization of debt issuance costs				41		65		58
		Stock-based compensation				2,157		831		1,088
		Deferred income taxes				1,182		597		249
		Earnings of equity method investees				(318)		(268)		(220)
		Excess tax benefit of exercise of common stock options				(895)		(2,714)		(3,611)
		Loss/(gain) on disposal of property and equipment				32		-		(11)
		Pension payment				-		-		(2,047)
		Other				(206)		(76)		97
		Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of effects of business acquisitions):
			Receivables			(48,879)		(23,021)		(14,154)
			Inventories			(52,831)		8,553		(41,106)
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets			(1,118)		3,398		(2,419)
			Accounts payable			50,018		(5,150)		39,781
			Accrued expenses			2,516		1,349		717
				Net cash provided by operating activities		14,238		32,428		16,866
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
		Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(51,718)		(9,000)		(39,645)
		Purchases of property and equipment				(7,597)		(12,516)		(4,388)
		Proceeds from sales of property and equipment				96		-		-
		Other				(646)		(3,993)		(57)
				Net cash used in investing activities		(59,865)		(25,509)		(44,090)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
		Borrowings on line-of-credit				539,071		249,978		151,616
		Payments on line-of-credit				(494,186)		(257,166)		(141,500)
		Proceeds from issuance of common stock				562		412		248
		Proceeds from exercise of common stock options				154		98		403
		Excess tax benefit of exercise of common stock options				895		2,714		3,611
		Payment of debt issuance costs				(111)		-		(116)
		Payment on long-term debt and capital lease obligations				(986)		(3,327)		(477)
				Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities		45,399		(7,291)		13,785
Effect of exchange rate on Cash and Cash Equivalents						136		67		48
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents						(92)		(305)		(13,391)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period						606		911		14,302
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period					$	514	$	606	$	911
See notes to consolidated financial statements

47

MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Dollars and sterling pounds in thousands, except share and per share data

1. Business Description and Basis of Presentation

MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. is a leading distributor of animal health products to veterinarians in the United States and United Kingdom. We sell our products to veterinarians in both the companion and production animal markets. We operate fourteen distribution centers located across the United States and one distribution center in the United Kingdom.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying consolidated financial statements consist of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to herein as “MWI” or the “Company.” All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.  We use the equity method of accounting for our investments in entities in which we have significant influence; generally this represents an ownership interest between 20% and 50%. Our share of income or loss from these investments is reported as increases or decreases in the respective investment with a corresponding amount reported as other income.

Basis of Accounting and Use of Estimates — The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In preparing financial information, we use certain estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Some of these estimates require difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. Estimates are used when accounting for sales returns, allowance for doubtful accounts, customer incentives, vendor rebates, inventories, goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization, employee benefits, and contingencies. The estimates of fair value of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses for the periods are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable.

Segment Information — We are a distributor of animal health products to veterinarians. Our financial results are disclosed as one reportable segment.  We identified two operating segments based on geographic areas but aggregate based on applicable accounting standards.  We determined that the two operating segments have similar operating margins and are expected to maintain this similarity into the future.  Additionally, our products, customers, operations, delivery to market and regulatory environments are all similar in nature.

Foreign Currency Translation — For our international operations, local currencies have been determined to be the functional currencies.  We translate functional currency assets and liabilities to their U.S. dollar equivalents at rates in effect at the balance sheet date and record these translation adjustments in Stockholders’ equity – Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss).  We translate functional currency statement of income amounts to their U.S. dollar equivalents at average rates for the period.

Other Comprehensive Income — Comprehensive income includes cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and actuarial adjustments on pension valuation. Comprehensive income has been reflected in the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and in Note 15 – Other Comprehensive Income.

Revenue Recognition — We sell products we source from vendors to our customers through either a “buy/sell” transaction or an agency relationship with our vendors. In a “buy/sell” transaction, we purchase or take inventory of products from the vendor. When a customer places an order with us, we pick, pack, ship and invoice the customer for the order. We recognize revenue from “buy/sell” transactions as product sales when the product is delivered to the customer. We accept product returns from our customers. We estimate returns based on historical experience and recognize these estimated returns as a reduction of product sales. Product returns have not been significant to our financial statements. We record revenues net of sales tax.  In an agency relationship, we generally do not purchase and take inventory of products from vendors. We receive an order from a customer, then transmit the order to the vendor, who picks, packs and ships the order to the customer. In some cases, the vendor invoices and collects payment from the customer, while in other cases we invoice and collect payment from the customer on behalf of the vendor. We receive a commission payment for soliciting the order from the customer and for providing other customer service activities. Commissions are recognized when the services upon which the commissions are based are complete. Gross billings from agency contracts were $332,343, $371,024 and $328,053 for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and generated commission revenue of $16,979, $20,655 and $16,780 for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

48

Cost of Product Sales and Vendor Rebates — Cost of product sales consist of our inventory product cost, including shipping costs to and from our distribution centers. Costs of fulfillment are included in selling, general and administrative costs. Vendor rebates are recorded based on the terms of the contracts or programs with each vendor. We receive quarterly, semi-annual and annual performance-based rebates from third-party vendors based upon attainment of certain sales and/or purchase goals. Sales rebates are classified in the accompanying consolidated statements of income as a reduction to cost of product sales at the time the sales performance measures are achieved. Purchase rebates are measured against inventory purchases from the vendors and are classified as a reduction of inventory until the product is sold. When the inventory is sold and purchase measures are achieved, purchase rebates are recognized as a reduction to cost of product sales.

Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those determined using the estimates described above. We expect that our estimates in the future will continue to be reasonable as our rebates are based on specific vendor program goals and are principally recorded upon achievement of sales or purchase performance measures. Vendors may change or eliminate rebate programs from year to year.

Customer Incentives — Customer incentives are accrued based on the terms of the contracts with each customer. These incentive programs provide that the customer receive an incentive based on their product purchases or attainment of performance goals. Incentives are estimated based on the specific terms in each agreement, historical experience and product growth rates.  Incentives are recognized as a reduction to product sales.

Cash and Cash Equivalents  — Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase. Our banking arrangements allow us to fund outstanding checks when presented to the financial institution for payment.

Inventories — Inventories, consisting of pharmaceuticals, vaccines, parasiticides, diagnostics, micro feed ingredients, capital equipment and technology, supplies and nutritional products, are stated at the lower of cost (on a moving-average basis) or market.

Property and Equipment — Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, which include the shorter of useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements, of the related assets as follows:

Buildings                                                                        25 to 35 years

Machinery, furniture and equipment                                                   3 to 15 years

Computer equipment                                                                                3 to 7 years

Leasehold improvements                                                                       1 to 10 years

The cost and accumulated depreciation of items sold or retired are removed from the property accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in net income. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred and improvements are capitalized.

We periodically review long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. No impairments were identified during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets — We recognize the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination as goodwill on the consolidated balance sheet. We perform an annual impairment test on goodwill as of September 30th each year.  We calculate the fair value of each reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis and compare the fair value to its book value.  We have concluded that there was no impairment during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010. Impairment tests will continue to be performed at least annually and more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible impairment.

49

Identifiable intangible assets primarily include customer relationships, trademarks and patents, technology and covenants not to compete and are amortized, as necessary, over their useful lives or contractual term which range from 1-20 years.  We review identifiable intangible assets at least annually for impairment or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  No impairments were identified during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Other Assets — Included in other assets are our equity method investments and investments in entities accounted for under the cost method of accounting, which includes an investment in Cubex of $4,000. We periodically evaluate these investments for other-than-temporary impairment using both qualitative and quantitative criteria, or when indicators of impairment are noted. In the event an investment is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, we would recognize the loss component in the consolidated statements of income.  Other assets also consist of debt issuance costs that are being amortized over the term of the related debt.

Earnings Per Common Share — Basic earnings per common share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares during the applicable period. Diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares plus the weighted-average number of potential outstanding common shares. Potential common shares that would increase earnings per share amounts are antidilutive and are, therefore, excluded from the earnings per common share computations. Earnings per common share is computed separately for each period presented.

Income Taxes — Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recognized to provide for temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred taxes are measured using enacted tax rates in effect during the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

Concentrations of Risk — Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of our receivables. Our customers are geographically dispersed throughout the United States and United Kingdom. We routinely assess the financial strength of our customers and review their credit history before extending credit. In addition, we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information.

Product sales to Banfield were approximately 6% of our total product sales in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, and 9% in fiscal year 2010. Product sales to Feeders’ Advantage, a related party (See Note 13), were approximately 3% of our total product sales in fiscal year 2012, and 4% of our total product sales in fiscal years 2011 and 2010.

Advertising — Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included as part of selling, general and administrative expenses. Advertising costs were $1,203, $723 and $717 in fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Recently Issued and New Accounting Pronouncements —In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income in an entity's financial statements. The guidance requires that comprehensive income be presented either in one continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements presenting the components of net income and its total, the components of other comprehensive income and its total, and total comprehensive income. The guidance also requires that reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income be presented in both the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income. The guidance is effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012.  We do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment (“ASU 2011-08”) permitting the assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether events and circumstances lead to the conclusion that it is necessary to perform the traditional two-step impairment test. Under ASU 2011-08, entities testing goodwill for impairment now have the option to perform a qualitative assessment before having to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit. If an entity determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more-likely-than-not less than the carrying amount, the existing two-step quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. This update is effective for us on October 1, 2012. We do not believe that the adoption of this provision will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

50

3. Business Acquisitions

On February 8, 2010, MWI Veterinary Supply Co. (“MWI Co.”) purchased all of the outstanding share capital of Centaur Services Limited (“Centaur”), based in the United Kingdom for a purchase price of $44,053, consisting of $42,053 in cash and $2,000 in a note payable due in one year.  Subsequent to the acquisition of Centaur, we funded $2,047 to the pension plan as required by the terms of the share purchase agreement.  The purchase price was reduced subsequent to the acquisition date by $1,868 as a result of a post-closing working capital and debt adjustment.  Centaur is a supplier of animal health products to veterinarians in the United Kingdom.  Centaur sells products to both the companion animal market and production animal market.  The acquisition of Centaur has allowed us to expand into the international markets.  We incurred $1,100 of direct acquisition-related expenses.  The intangible assets acquired in the acquisition have estimated useful lives between 1 and 20 years, which include customer relationships, trade names and other intangible assets.  The amount recorded in goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

On March 21, 2011, MWI Co. purchased substantially all of the assets of Nelson Laboratories Limited Partnership (“Nelson”) for $7,000 in cash. Nelson is a distributor of animal health products to over 1,100 veterinary practices, primarily in the Midwestern United States. This acquisition allows us to better serve our customers in this region of the United States. An intangible asset representing customer relationships acquired in the acquisition has an estimated useful life of 10 years. The amount recorded in goodwill is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years.

On October 31, 2011, MWI Co. purchased substantially all of the assets of Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd. (“Micro”) for $60,878, including $53,400 in cash and 94,359 shares of common stock valued at $7,158, which is the fair value of the common stock as of the date of acquisition and a working capital adjustment of $320. The $53,400 paid in cash as consideration of Micro was funded with borrowings under our Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 7) as then in effect. Micro is a value-added distributor to the production animal market, including the distribution of micro feed ingredients, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, parasiticides, supplies and other animal health products. Micro also is a leading innovator of proprietary, computerized management systems for the production animal market. We incurred $1,104 of direct acquisition-related and integration expenses.  The intangible assets acquired in the acquisition include technology, customer relationships, trade name and covenant not to compete. The useful life of the amortizing intangible assets ranges from 5 years to 17 years. Trade name is a non-amortizing intangible asset. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and represents the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized. The goodwill recorded as part of the acquisition of Micro includes the expected synergies that we believed would result from this acquisition.  The amount recorded in goodwill is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years. The fair values assigned to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management's estimates and assumptions as well as other information compiled by management, including valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of each acquisition, which may be adjusted during the measurement period as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805. These purchase price allocations are based on a combination of valuations and analyses.

51

		2012		2011		2010
Cash	$	1	$	-	$	674
Receivables		22,374		4,041		32,371
Inventories		27,701		3,594		17,830
Other current assets		105		-		480
Property and equipment		8,882		1,900		5,275
Investments		199		-		-
Goodwill		12,473		1,823		9,483
Intangibles		15,760		140		17,658
Total assets acquired		87,495		11,498		83,771
Accounts payable		25,026		4,498		25,811
Accrued expenses		1,591		-		5,299
Other liabilities		-		-		10,476
Total liabilities assumed		26,617		4,498		41,586
Net assets acquired	$	60,878	$	7,000	$	42,185

The following table presents information for Micro that is included in our consolidated statements of income from the acquisition date of October 31, 2011 through the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012:

	Micro's operations included in MWI's results
			Fiscal year ended September 30, 2012
Revenues		$	246,624
Net Income		$	4,089

The following table presents supplemental pro forma information for the Company as if the acquisition of Micro had occurred on October 1, 2011 for the period ended September 30, 2012, on October 1, 2010 for the period ended September 30, 2011 and on October 1, 2009 for the period ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited):

		Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Results
		Fiscal year ended September 30,
		2012		2011		2010
Revenues	$	2,097,076	$	1,793,672	$	1,408,302
Net Income	$	53,571	$	45,769	$	35,190

The unaudited pro forma consolidated results are not necessarily indicative of what our consolidated results of operations would have been had we completed the acquisition on October 1, 2011, October 1, 2010 and on October 1, 2009.  Additionally, the unaudited pro forma consolidated results do not purport to project the future results of operations of the combined company.

52

4. Receivables

Receivables consist of the following at September 30:

		2012		2011
Trade	$	271,199	$	203,038
Vendor rebates and programs		20,469		15,404
		291,668		218,442
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(2,746)		(2,581)
	$	288,922	$	215,861

Approximately 7% and 8% of our trade receivables resulted from transactions with a single customer as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectfully.

5. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following at September 30:

		2012		2011
Land	$	1,952	$	1,723
Building and leasehold improvements		14,420		13,427
Machinery, furniture and equipment		33,075		20,979
Computer equipment		8,276		5,864
Construction in progress		1,773		2,203
		59,496		44,196
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(23,712)		(18,987)
	$	35,784	$	25,209

We recorded depreciation expense of $6,210, $4,501 and $3,692 for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

6. Goodwill and Intangibles

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

		2012		2011
Goodwill - Beginning of year	$	49,041	$	47,330
Acquisition activity		12,473		1,823
Foreign exchange		327		(112)
Goodwill - End of year	$	61,841	$	49,041

53

Intangible assets consist of the following as of September 30:

		Useful Lives	2012		2011
Amortizing:
	Customer relationships	9-20 years	$	31,045	$	24,981
	Covenants not to compete	1-5 years		710		808
	Technology	11 years		5,830		-
	Other	3-5 years		1,084		455
				38,669		26,244
Accumulated amortization				(7,640)		(5,109)
				31,029		21,135
Non-Amortizing:
	Trade names and patents			7,677		3,759
			$	38,706	$	24,894

We recorded amortization expense of $2,852, $1,783 and $1,312 for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Estimated amortization expense related to intangible assets as of September 30, 2012 is as follows:

	Amount
2013	$	2,737
2014		2,601
2015		2,295
2016		2,192
2017		2,119
Thereafter		19,085
	$	31,029

7. Debt

Outstanding debt consists of the following as of September 30:

		2012		2011
Revolving credit facility, 1.10% as of September 30, 2012		$	39,500	$	-
Sterling revolving credit facility, 1.57% as of September 30, 2012			8,580		2,907
Capital lease obligations (1)			441		1,263
Total debt and capital lease obligations			48,521		4,170
	Less: Long-term portion of capital lease obligations		(104)		(354)
Total debt and capital lease obligations included in current liabilities		$	48,417	$	3,816
(1) The capital lease obligations have varying maturity dates.

54

Revolving Credit Facility — On November 1, 2011, MWI Co. as borrower, entered into a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”) with MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Memorial Pet Care, Inc., as guarantors, and Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as lenders (collectively, the “Lenders”), amending the Credit Agreement dated December 13, 2006, and as amended from time to time, by and among MWI Co., MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., Memorial Pet Care, Inc. and the Lenders (the  “Credit Agreement”).  As discussed in Note 3 – Business Acquisitions, MWI Co.’s purchase of the assets of Micro was completed on October 31, 2011, using borrowing capacity that existed prior to the effectiveness of the Third Amendment.  The Third Amendment allows for an aggregate revolving commitment of the Lenders under the Credit Agreement of $150,000 and a maturity date of November 1, 2016.  Under the Third Amendment, the margin on variable interest rate borrowings ranges from 0.95% to 1.50%.  The commitment fee under the Third Amendment ranges from 0.15% to 0.25% depending on the funded debt to EBITDA ratio.  The variable interest rate is equal to the Daily LIBOR Floating Rate or the LIBOR 1-month, 2-month, 3-month or 6-month fixed rate (at MWI Co.’s option) plus the margin.  The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants, including a fixed charge ratio and a funded debt to EBITDA ratio.  We were in compliance with all of the covenants as of September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Sterling Revolving Credit Facility— On November 5, 2010, Centaur entered into a £12,500 unsecured revolving line of credit facility (the “sterling revolving credit facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. London Branch (“Wells Fargo”).  The sterling revolving credit facility is for a three year term with interest paid at the end of the applicable 1-month, 2-month or 3-month interest period.  Interest is based on LIBOR for the applicable interest period plus an applicable margin of 1.05% to 1.90%.  The facility contains financial covenants requiring Centaur to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of £3,000.  As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, Centaur was in compliance with the covenant.

8. Common Stock and Stock-Based Awards

2002 Stock Plan

We had a 2002 Stock Plan (the “2002 Plan”) to provide our directors, executives and other key employees with additional incentives by allowing them to acquire an ownership interest in us and, as a result, encouraging them to contribute to our success. All options that were granted under this plan have been exercised and there are no additional shares available for issuance under the 2002 Plan.

2005 Stock Plan

We have a 2005 Stock-Based Award and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2005 Plan”), under which we may offer restricted shares of our common stock and grant options to purchase shares of our common stock to selected employees and non-employee directors. The purpose of the 2005 Plan is to promote our long-term financial success by attracting, retaining and rewarding eligible participants. At September 30, 2012 and 2011 we had 865,917 and 932,438 shares, respectively, of our common stock available for issuance under the 2005 Plan.

The 2005 Plan permits us to grant stock options (both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options), restricted stock and deferred stock. The compensation committee will determine the number and type of stock-based awards to each participant, the exercise price of each award, the duration of the award (not to exceed ten years), vesting provisions and all other terms and conditions of such award in individual award agreements. The 2005 Plan provides that upon termination of employment with us, unless determined otherwise by the compensation committee at the time options are granted, the exercise period for vested awards will generally be limited, provided that vested awards will be canceled immediately upon a termination for cause or voluntary termination. The 2005 Plan provides for the cancellation of all unvested awards upon termination of employment with us, unless determined otherwise by the compensation committee at the time awards are granted.

55

A summary of common stock options activity under the 2002 and 2005 Plans are as follows:
	2012			2011				2010
		Weighted				Weighted				Weighted
	Number	average		Number		average		Number		average
	of	exercise		of		exercise		of		exercise
	Shares	price		Shares		price		Shares		price
Outstanding at beginning of year	37,385	$	14.73		139,550	$	4.65		339,404	$	3.11
Exercised	(14,769)		10.44		(102,128)		0.96		(199,670)		2.02
Cancelled or expired	(256)		17.00		(37)		17.00		(184)		17.00
Outstanding at end of year	22,360	$	17.53		37,385	$	14.73		139,550	$	4.65
Exercisable at end of year	22,360	$	17.53		37,385	$	14.73		139,550	$	4.65

	Outstanding and exercisable options
			Weighted
			average
			remaining		Weighted
			contractual		average
		Number of	life		exercise
Range of exercise prices		Shares	(in years)		price
$17.00 - $19.99		19,990		2.8	$	17.00
$20.00 - $22.60		2,370		3.0	$	22.04

The intrinsic value of the shares outstanding and exercisable was $1,993 as of September 30, 2012 and $2,022 as of September 30, 2011.

A summary of restricted stock awards activity under the 2005 Plan are as follows:
	2012			2011				2010
		Weighted				Weighted				Weighted
	Number	average		Number		average		Number		average
	of	grant date		of		grant date		of		grant date
	Shares	fair value		Shares		fair value		Shares		fair value
Nonvested at beginning of year	105,540	$	61.69		70,584	$	49.33		38,388	$	38.33
Granted	74,848		101.97		63,900		71.14		58,350		55.05
Vested	(48,072)		102.09		(25,934)		52.46		(25,994)		45.99
Forfeitures	(2,920)		63.49		(3,010)		51.92		(160)		39.27
Nonvested at end of year	129,396	$	69.94		105,540	$	61.69		70,584	$	49.33

As of September 30, 2012, total unrecognized stock based compensation expense related to nonvested awards was approximately $10,272 before income taxes, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining term of the awards which range from 1 to 5 years.  During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we recognized $3,569 and $1,387, respectively, in compensation expense related to common stock awards.

56

2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) allows substantially all employees to purchase shares of our common stock at 95% of the fair market value on the date of purchase.  The purchase date is the last trading date of the purchase period, which begins in March, June, September and December.  Employees accumulate amounts through payroll deductions during the purchase period of between 1% and 10% but no more than $20 annually.  An employee is allowed to purchase a maximum of 200 shares per purchase period.  We issued 6,859 and 6,058 shares of our common stock under the ESPP during fiscal years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

9. Computation Of Earnings Per Common Share (In thousands, except per share data)

		2012				2011				2010
		Basic		Diluted		Basic		Diluted		Basic		Diluted
Net income		$	53,477	$	53,477	$	42,580	$	42,580	$	33,440	$	33,440
Weighted average common
	shares outstanding		12,616		12,616		12,464		12,464		12,241		12,241
Effect of diluted securities
	Stock options and restricted stock				31				49				154
Weighted average shares
	outstanding				12,647				12,513				12,395
Earnings per share		$	4.24	$	4.23	$	3.42	$	3.40	$	2.73	$	2.70
There was no impact from anti-dilutive shares in fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 or 2010.

10. Income Taxes

Income before taxes is as follows:

		2012		2011		2010
Income before taxes
	United States	$	81,482	$	65,271	$	52,110
	Foreign		4,458		3,429		2,216
Total income before taxes		$	85,940	$	68,700	$	54,326

57

The components of income tax expense consist of the following:

			2012		2011		2010
United States
	Current payable
		Federal	$	25,535	$	20,741	$	17,060
		State		4,494		3,696		2,751
	Deferred
		Federal		1,308		628		538
		State		220		120		95
Total U.S. tax expense				31,557		25,185		20,444
International
	Current payable			1,252		1,109		826
	Deferred			(346)		(174)		(384)
Total international tax expense				906		935		442
Total income tax expense			$	32,463	$	26,120	$	20,886

Our deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at September 30:

		2012		2011
Deferred tax assets:
	Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	958	$	1,005
	Inventories		521		363
	Lease expense		394		282
	Employee benefits		439		740
	Other		368		325
Total deferred tax assets			2,680		2,715
Deferred tax liabilities:
	Property and equipment		(7,684)		(6,534)
	Prepaid expenses		(395)		(316)
	Other		(201)		(182)
Total deferred tax liabilities			(8,280)		(7,032)
Net deferred liabilities		$	(5,600)	$	(4,317)

Other deferred tax assets totaling $770 and $758 as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, arising from the Company’s foreign subsidiary, are subject to full valuation allowance.

58

Income tax expense differed from income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate for all periods presented as follows:

	2012		2011		2010
Taxes computed at statutory rate		35.0%		35.0%		35.0%
State income taxes (net of federal income tax benefit)		3.6		3.7		3.5
Foreign		(1.1)		(0.9)		(1.1)
Other		0.3		0.2		1.0
		37.8%		38.0%		38.4%

In general, it is the practice and intention of the Company to reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations.  As of September 30, 2012, the Company has not made a provision for U.S. income or additional foreign withholding taxes on the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration.  Generally, such amounts become subject to U.S. taxation upon the remittance of dividends and under certain other circumstances.  It is not practicable to estimate the amount of deferred tax liability related to investments in foreign subsidiaries because of the complexities of the hypothetical calculation.

A reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

	2012		2011		2010
Unrecognized tax benefits – Beginning of year	$	23	$	198	$	223
Gross decreases related to prior period tax positions		(8)		(175)		-
Gross increases related to current period tax positions		-		-		175
Settlements		(15)		-		(200)
Unrecognized tax benefits – End of year	$	-	$	23	$	198

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the amount included in our income tax expense for tax-related interest and penalties was not significant.  Of the $23 unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2011, $15 would have impacted our effective rate, if recognized.  Of the $198 unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2010, $15 would have impacted our effective rate, if recognized.  We expect no material changes to our unrecognized tax benefits during the next fiscal year.  Our policy for classifying interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits is to include such items in income tax expense.

We filed Form 3115 Application of Change in Accounting Method with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.  We filed an advance consent request for a non-automatic account method change for tax purposes for which we received approval during fiscal year 2011.  Resolution decreased the liability for unrecognized tax benefits by approximately $175.

We are under examination by the IRS for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.  This examination may lead to ordinary course adjustments or proposed adjustments to our taxes.

With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to income tax examination for years before 2007 in the U.S. and significant state and local jurisdictions.  We are no longer subject to income tax examinations for years before 2010 in significant foreign jurisdictions.

59

11. Statements of Cash Flows — Supplemental and Noncash Disclosures

	2012		2011		2010
Supplemental Disclosures
Cash paid for interest	$	788	$	505	$	340
Cash paid for income taxes		31,025		21,302		19,850
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Issuance of restricted common stock for asset acquisition		7,158		-		-
Capital lease asset additions and related obligations		165		455		-
Equipment acquisitions financed with accounts payable		192		124		23

12. Commitments and Contingencies

We are a party to legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of our business.  In our opinion, pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

We have operating leases for office and distribution center space and equipment for varying periods. We also lease some of our vehicles in the United Kingdom under capital leases.  Certain leases have renewal options and require contingent payments for increases, including executory costs, property taxes, insurance and certain other costs in excess of a base year amount. Total rent expense for the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $5,382, $4,259 and $4,051, respectively.

The aggregate future noncancelable minimum rental payments on operating leases and capital leases at September 30, 2012 are as follows:

	Lease Obligations
Fiscal Year	Operating Leases		Capital Leases
2013	$	4,663	$	337
2014		4,164		88
2015		3,869		16
2016		3,768		-
2017		3,669		-
Thereafter		15,112		-
Total future minimum obligations	$	35,245	$	441

13. Related Party Transactions

MWI Co., our subsidiary, holds a 50% membership interest in Feeders’ Advantage that is accounted for as an investment using the equity method. Sales of products to Feeders’ Advantage, which are at our cost, were $61,873, $55,185 and $43,017 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. MWI Co. charged Feeders’ Advantage for certain operating and administrative services of $1,008, $919 and $794 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors are each members of the board of managers of Feeders’ Advantage.

MWI Co. allows Feeders’ Advantage to use its cash management system to finance its day-to-day operations. At any given time, the outstanding position used in the cash management system may be a receivable or payable depending on the cash activity.  A receivable balance bears interest at the prime rate. The interest due on the outstanding receivable is calculated and charged to Feeders’ Advantage on the last day of each month. Conversely, to the extent MWI Co. has a payable balance due to Feeders’ Advantage, the payable balance accrues interest in favor of Feeders’ Advantage at the average federal funds rates in effect for that month.  As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, MWI Co. had a receivable balance from Feeders’ Advantage of $62 and $756, respectively.

60

14. Employee Benefit Plans

We have a multi-employer defined contribution profit sharing plan with a 401(k) arrangement for employees in the United States.  To become eligible for the profit sharing portion of the plan, an employee must complete two years of service and attain the age of twenty-one. Participation is automatic beginning the following January or July. To become eligible for the 401(k) portion of the plan, the employee must complete three-months of service and attain the age of twenty-one.

Both portions of the plan allow for employer contributions. We are required to match 50% of the employee’s contribution to the 401(k) portion of the plan up to 6% of the employee’s salary. Our matching contributions for the 401(k) portion of the plan were $1,871, $1,464 and $1,108 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Employee’s contributions are fully vested immediately while employer contributions vest over a five-year period.

Contributions to the profit sharing portion of the Plans are discretionary, ranging from 0% to 3%, and are approved by our Board of Directors. Total profit sharing expense for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $1,847, $1,516 and $1,244, respectively. Employer contributions are fully vested immediately.

Centaur sponsors a defined contribution plan for all other staff not participating in the defined benefit plan described below. The contributions made by the employer over the period are detailed below. Contributions are currently payable at a minimum of 3% up to a maximum of 6% of eligible pay if matched by employee.  The matching contribution for the plan was $250, $269 and $207 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Centaur operates a defined benefit pension plan which provides benefits based on pensionable pay and is closed to future benefit accrual.

The fair value of plan assets, benefit obligation and funded status of the defined benefit plan as of September 30 is as follows:

	2012		2011		2010
Fair value of plan assets	$	5,329	$	4,760	$	4,771
Benefit obligation		(7,228)		(7,031)		(7,160)
Unfunded pension liability	$	(1,899)	$	(2,271)	$	(2,389)

61

The unfunded pension liability is recognized as other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Net periodic benefit expense for the fiscal year ended September 30 consisted of the following:

		2012		2011		2010
Interest cost		$	219	$	255	$	159
Expected return on plan assets			(249)		(205)		(139)
Net periodic (benefit)/cost			(30)		50		20
Other changes recognized in other comprehensive income
	Actuarial (gain)/loss		(373)		(88)		591
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and
	other comprehensive income	$	(403)	$	(38)	$	611
Total (gain)/loss recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax		$	(228)	$	(21)	$	457

The estimated net actuarial loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive losses into net periodic benefit costs during fiscal year 2012 is not significant.  The following table provides the weighted-average actuarial assumptions:

		2012
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations
	Discount rate	3.0%
	Rate of compensation increase (1)	N/A
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost
	Discount rate	3.1%
	Expected return on plan assets	5.2%
	Rate of compensation increase (1)	N/A
(1) There is no assumed rate of compensation increase as there have been no current active members since April 2006.

The assets of the plan are invested as follows as of September 30:

		2012				2011
		Market		Asset	Fair Value	Market		Asset	Fair Value
Asset Class		Value		Allocation	Level	Value		Allocation	Level
Equities		$	1,793	34%	2	$	1,752	36%	2
Corporate bonds			1,275	24%	2		977	21%	2
UK Government bonds			485	9%	2		445	9%	2
Cash			218	4%	1		26	1%	1
Other assets			1,558	29%	2		1,560	33%	2
	Total	$	5,329	100%		$	4,760	100%

62

15. Other Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

				2012		2011		2010
Net income			$	53,477	$	42,580	$	33,440
Other comprehensive income:
	Foreign currency translation			1,877		(663)		536
	Actuarial gain/(loss) on pension valuation, net of deferred taxes			228		21		(457)
		Total comprehensive income	$	55,582	$	41,938	$	33,519

16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Current fair value accounting guidance includes a hierarchy that is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures.  This hierarchy prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques based on observable and unobservable data.  The guidance categorizes these inputs used in measuring fair value into three levels which include the following:

·   Level 1 – observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

·   Level 2 – inputs, other than quoted prices, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and

·   Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable, and the fair values approximate book values due to their short maturities.

Our revolving credit facility in the United States and in the United Kingdom were amended in the recent past and are based on market conditions such as LIBOR.  Because these credit facilities include interest rates based on current market conditions, we believe that the estimated fair value of our debt was materially the same as our carrying value.

17. Geographic Information

Revenues and long-lived assets by geographic region are as follows:

			2012		2011		2010
Revenues for the fiscal years ended September 30
	United States		$	1,776,414	$	1,304,794	$	1,074,226
	International			298,732		260,546		155,116
		Total	$	2,075,146	$	1,565,340	$	1,229,342
Long-lived assets as of September 30
	United States		$	29,001	$	18,953	$	9,762
	International			6,783		6,256		5,476
		Total	$	35,784	$	25,209	$	15,238

63

18. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

		Three-Months Ended
		Dec. 31,		Mar. 31,		June 30,		Sept. 30,		Year
			(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) (1)
Fiscal Year 2012
Total revenues		$	461,901	$	507,170	$	554,669	$	551,406	$	2,075,146
Gross profit			62,514		66,618		69,519		68,265		266,916
Operating income			21,415		21,411		23,287		19,654		85,767
Net income			13,196		13,178		14,503		12,600		53,477
Earnings per common share — basic		$	1.05	$	1.04	$	1.15	$	0.99	$	4.24
Earnings per common share — diluted		$	1.05	$	1.04	$	1.15	$	0.99	$	4.23
Weighted average common shares
	outstanding:
	Basic		12,581		12,619		12,628		12,636		12,616
	Diluted		12,605		12,648		12,662		12,672		12,647
Fiscal Year 2011
Total revenues		$	366,174	$	367,112	$	410,736	$	421,318	$	1,565,340
Gross profit			50,072		50,986		54,087		50,440		205,585
Operating income			17,536		16,869		18,701		15,560		68,666
Net income			10,828		10,332		11,390		10,030		42,580
Earnings per common share — basic		$	0.87	$	0.83	$	0.91	$	0.80	$	3.42
Earnings per common share — diluted		$	0.87	$	0.83	$	0.91	$	0.80	$	3.40
Weighted average common shares
	outstanding:
	Basic		12,415		12,462		12,484		12,497		12,464
	Diluted		12,483		12,511		12,526		12,531		12,513
(1) The sums of the quarterly net income and earnings per share amounts may not agree to the year-to-date
earnings per common share amount as a result of rounding.

64

Item 9.                      Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 30, 2012. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, including the accumulation and communication of disclosures to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission‘s rules and forms.

Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting and the attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm are set forth below on this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)).

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

In October 2011, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd. (“Micro”), a value-added distributor to the production animal market. For purposes of determining the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012, and any change in our internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal fourth quarter of 2012, management has excluded the internal control over financial reporting of Micro from its evaluation of these matters. Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012, include approximately $79 million of assets (including intangibles and goodwill) or 11% of our total assets, and approximately $247 million of revenue or 12% of our total revenues, associated with Micro.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting excluding the recently completed acquisition of Micro as of September 30, 2012. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of September 30, 2012, internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Their report is included herein.

65

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.

Boise, Idaho

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd. (“Micro”), which was acquired in October 2011 and whose financial statements constitute 11% total assets and 12% of net revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Micro. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012, of the Company, and our report dated November 27, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boise, Idaho

November 27, 2012

66

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Registrant.

The information regarding directors and nominees for directors of the Company, including identification of the audit committee and audit committee financial expert, is presented under the headings “Corporate Governance—Committees of the Board of Directors,” and “Election of Directors—Nominees For Directors” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for use in connection with the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. The information contained under these headings is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding the executive officers of the Company is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under Item 1 of Part I as permitted by Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K.

The Company has adopted a code of conduct that applies to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. This code of conduct is available on the Company’s Web site at www.mwivet.com. If the Company makes any amendments to this code other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grants any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of this code to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, the Company will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies in a report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Information concerning executive compensation is presented under the headings “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement.  The information contained under these headings is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is set forth under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Directors and Officers” in the Proxy Statement. The information contained under these headings is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of September 30, 2012 about the common stock that may be issued under all of our existing equity compensation plans, including the 2002 Stock Plan and 2005 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans. Both of these plans have been approved by our stockholders.

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		22,360		$17.53		865,917
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		22,360		$17.53		865,917

67

Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence.

Information concerning related transactions and director independence is presented under the heading “Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence” in the Proxy Statement. The information contained under this heading is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is presented under the heading “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement. The information contained under this heading is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1) Consolidated Financial Statements: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements at Item 8 on page 42 of this report.

2) Financial Statement Schedule: Schedule II—Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

3) Exhibits are incorporated herein by reference or are filed with this report as set forth in the Index to Exhibits on pages 70 through 73 hereof

MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC.

SCHEDULE II—CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(Amounts in thousands)

	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charged (Credited) to Costs and Expenses			Deductions/ Write-offs			Balance at End of Period
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Year ended September 30, 2010		$   3,006		$(134	)		$(302	)		$    2,570
Year ended September 30, 2011		2,570		437			(428	)		2,579
Year ended September 30, 2012		2,579		661			(494	)		2,746

68

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.
	By: /s/ Mary Patricia B. Thompson
	Mary Patricia B. Thompson
	(Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer)
Date: November 27, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated as of November 27, 2012.

/s/ James F. Cleary, Jr.	/s/ Mary Patricia B. Thompson
James F. Cleary, Jr. Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	Mary Patricia B. Thompson Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Keith E. Alessi	/s/ Bruce C. Bruckmann
Keith E. Alessi (Director)	Bruce C. Bruckmann (Director)
/s/ John F. McNamara	/s/ A. Craig Olson
John F. McNamara (Director)	A. Craig Olson (Director)
/s/ Robert N. Rebholtz	/s/ William J. Robison
Robert N. Rebholtz (Director)	William J. Robison (Director)

69

Index to Exhibits

Filed with the Annual Report

on Form 10-K for the

Year Ended September 30, 2012

Number	Description
2.1	Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 20, 2011 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed November 28, 2011.
3.1	Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 1, 2007.
3.2	Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 1, 2007.
4.1	Form of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. common stock certificate, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).
4.2	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 18, 2002 by and between MWI Holdings, Inc., Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co. II, L.P., Agri Beef Co. and the other parties thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).
4.3	Executive Stock Agreement dated as of June 18, 2002 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply Co., MWI Holdings, Inc. and James Cleary, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*
4.4	Executive Stock Agreement dated as of June 18, 2002 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply Co., MWI Holdings, Inc. and Jeff Danielson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*
4.5	Executive Stock Agreement dated as of June 18, 2002 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply Co., MWI Holdings, Inc. and James Hay, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*
4.6	Executive Stock Agreement dated as of June 18, 2002 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply Co., MWI Holdings, Inc. and Mary Pat Thompson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*
4.7	First Amendment to Executive Stock Agreement dated as of May 6, 2005 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and James F. Cleary, Jr., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*
4.8	First Amendment to Executive Stock Agreement dated as of May 5, 2005 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Jeffrey J. Danielson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*
4.9	First Amendment to Executive Stock Agreement dated as of May 6, 2005 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and James S. Hay, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.11 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*

70

4.10	First Amendment to Executive Stock Agreement dated as of May 6, 2005 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Mary Patricia B. Thompson, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.13 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*
10.1	2002 Stock Option Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).*
10.2	MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. 2005 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan, adopted July 27, 2005, as Amended and Restated, effective July 24, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 8, 2007.*
10.3	Form of Option Letter, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg No. 333-124264).
10.4	Second Amendment to 2010-2011 Merial Independent Sales Agent Agreement between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Merial Limited effective as of February 20, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 29, 2011.†
10.5	First Amendment to the Agreement for Product Purchases effective as of July 1, 2009 by and between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Medical Management International, Inc., dba Banfield, The Pet Hospital®, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10K, filed November 20, 2009.†
10.6	First Amendment to the Agreement for Logistics Services effective as of July 1, 2009 by and between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Medical Management International, Inc., dba Banfield, The Pet Hospital®, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10K, filed November 20, 2009.†
10.7	Agreement for Home Delivery Logistics Services effective as of July 1, 2009 by and between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Medical Management International, Inc., dba Banfield, the Pet Hospital®, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10K, filed November 20, 2009.†
10.8	Credit Agreement dated as of December 13, 2006 by and between MWI Veterinary Supply Co., as Borrower, MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Memorial Pet Care, Inc. as Guarantors, Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Lenders, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed February 5, 2007.
10.9	2012 Livestock Products Distribution Agreement between MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc. effective as of January 1, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 3, 2012. †
10.10	2012 Pfizer Premier Equine Products Distribution Agreement between MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc. effective as of January 1, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 3, 2012. †
10.11	MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 1, 2008.
10.12	License Agreement dated and effective July 1, 2008 between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and American Animal Hospital Association, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed November 24, 2008. †
10.13	Sponsorship Letter Agreement dated June 30, 2008 between American Animal Hospital Association and MWI Veterinary Supply Co, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed November 24, 2008.
10.14	First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated February 8, 2010 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., MWI Veterinary Supply Co., Memorial Pet Care, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 12, 2010.

71

10.15	Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated August 10, 2010 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., MWI Veterinary Supply Co., Memorial Pet Care, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 13, 2010.
10.16	Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated November 1, 2011 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., MWI Veterinary Supply Co., Memorial Pet Care, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed November 28, 2011.
10.17	Non-competition and Confidential Information Agreement dated September 20, 2011, by and between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and William C. Pratt, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed November 28, 2011.
10.18	Non-competition and Confidential Information Agreement dated September 20, 2011, by and between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Mark Shaw, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed November 28, 2011.
10.19	Sterling Revolving Credit Facility dated November 5, 2010 by and among Centaur Services Limited and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2010.
10.20	Continuing Guaranty of MWI Veterinary Supply Co. dated November 5, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2010.
10.21	Distributor Agreement between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Intervet Inc., dba as Intervet/Schering Plough Animal Health effective as of December 1, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 6, 2010. †
10.22	Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement dated as of September 10, 2006 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and John Francis, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10Q, filed May 6, 2010.*
10.23	Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement dated as of August 26, 2011 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Kevin W. Price, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed November 28, 2011. *
10.24	2010 Livestock Products Distribution Agreement between MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc. effective as of January 1, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 5, 2011. †
10.25	2010 Pfizer Equine Products Marketing Agreement between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Pfizer Inc. effective as of January 1, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 5, 2011. †
10.26	2010 Strategic Brands Distribution Agreement between MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Pfizer Inc. effective as of January 1, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 5, 2011. †
10.27	Non-Exclusive Distributor Agreement by and between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and ABAXIS, Inc. effective as of January 1, 2013.
10.28	Letter Agreement by and between MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and ABAXIS, Inc. dated as of September 28, 2012. †
10.29	IDEXX Distribution Agreement by and between IDEXX Distribution, Inc. on behalf of itself, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., and entities controlled by or under common control with IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. and MWI Veterinary Supply Co. effective as of January 1, 2013. †
10.30	Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement dated as of September 12, 2011 by and among MWI Veterinary Supply Co. and Alden J. Sutherland.*
21.1	Subsidiaries of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.
23	Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

72

31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

* Identifies management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit hereto.

† Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request submitted to and approved by the SEC.

73