New Accounting Standards

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

New Accounting Standards

New Accounting Standards

Note 19.    New Accounting Standards

There have been no developments to recently issued accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements, from those disclosed in the Partnership’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except for the following:

Accounting Standards or Updates Recently Adopted

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. This standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs in a cloud computing arrangement with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred for an internal-use software license. The Partnership adopted this standard on January 1, 2020 with no material impact on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement,” which amends existing guidance on disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. This standard requires prospective application on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty. The effects of other amendments must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Partnership adopted this standard on January 1, 2020 with no material impact on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” and has modified the standard thereafter, now codified as ASC 326. ASC 326 requires that for most financial assets, losses be based on an expected loss approach, which includes estimates of losses over the life of exposure that considers historical, current and forecasted information. The Partnership adopted this standard on January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of this standard did not materially impact the measurement of the Partnership’s credit loss recognition and, therefore, did not have a material impact on the recognition of expected credit losses on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

The Partnership is exposed to credit losses primarily through its sales of refined petroleum products, gasoline blendstocks, renewable fuels, crude oil and propane. Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the Partnership’s customer base being large and diverse. The Partnership assesses each counterparty’s ability to pay for the products the Partnership sells by conducting a credit review. This credit review considers the Partnership’s expected billing exposure and timing for payment and the counterparty’s established credit rating or, in the case when a credit rating is not available, the Partnership’s assessment of the counterparty’s creditworthiness based on the Partnership’s analysis of the counterparty’s financial statements. The Partnership also considers contract terms and conditions and business strategy in its evaluation. A credit limit is established for each counterparty based on the outcome of this review. The Partnership may require collateralized asset support in the form of standby letters of credit, personal or corporate guarantees and/or a prepayment to mitigate credit risk.

The Partnership monitors its ongoing credit exposure through active reviews of counterparty balances against contract terms and due dates. The Partnership’s historical experience of collecting receivables, supported by the level of default, is that credit risk is low across classes of customers and locations and trade receivables are considered to be a single class of financial assets. Impairment for trade receivables are calculated for specific receivables with known or anticipated issues affecting the likelihood of collectability and for balances past due with a probability of default based on historical data as well as relevant forward-looking information. The Partnership’s activities include timely account reconciliations, dispute resolutions and payment confirmations. The Partnership utilizes internal legal counsel or collection agencies and outside legal counsel to pursue recovery of defaulted receivables.

Based on an aging analysis at June 30, 2020, approximately 98% of the Partnership’s accounts receivable were outstanding less than 30 days.

The following table presents changes in the credit loss allowance included in accounts receivable, net in the accompanying balance sheet (in thousands):

	Credit Loss
	Allowance
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	2,729
Current period provision		360
Write-offs charged against allowance for credit losses		(11)
Recoveries collected		165
Balance at June 30, 2020	$	3,243

Accounting Standards or Updates Not Yet Effective

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes,” which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC 740 related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.